1
|
Castro-Balado A, Varela-Rey I, Mejuto B, Mondelo-García C, Zarra-Ferro I, Rodríguez-Jato T, Fernández-Ferreiro A. Updated antimicrobial dosing recommendations for obese patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2024; 68:e0171923. [PMID: 38526051 PMCID: PMC11064535 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01719-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of obesity has increased considerably in the last few decades. Pathophysiological changes in obese patients lead to pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) alterations that can condition the correct exposure to antimicrobials if standard dosages are used. Inadequate dosing in obese patients can lead to toxicity or therapeutic failure. In recent years, additional antimicrobial PK/PD data, extended infusion strategies, and studies in critically ill patients have made it possible to obtain data to provide a better dosage in obese patients. Despite this, it is usually difficult to find information on drug dosing in this population, which is sometimes contradictory. This is a comprehensive review of the dosing of different types of antimicrobials (antibiotics, antifungals, antivirals, and antituberculosis drugs) in obese patients, where the literature on PK and possible dosing strategies in obese adults was critically assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Castro-Balado
- Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Iria Varela-Rey
- Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Beatriz Mejuto
- Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Cristina Mondelo-García
- Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Irene Zarra-Ferro
- Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Teresa Rodríguez-Jato
- Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Anxo Fernández-Ferreiro
- Pharmacy Department, University Clinical Hospital of Santiago de Compostela (SERGAS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Clinical Pharmacology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Hise NW, Petrak RM, Shah K, Diaz M, Chundi V, Redell M. Oritavancin Versus Daptomycin for Osteomyelitis Treatment After Surgical Debridement. Infect Dis Ther 2024; 13:535-547. [PMID: 38421519 DOI: 10.1007/s40121-024-00925-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Weekly intravenous (IV) oritavancin and daily daptomycin were compared in an outpatient setting following extensive surgical debridement for treating patients with osteomyelitis. METHODS This was a retrospective, observational study of patients diagnosed with acute osteomyelitis. Exclusion criteria were the use of Gram-negative antibiotic therapy, use of antibiotics for more than 48 h prior to oritavancin or daptomycin or prior use of > 2 doses of oritavancin or more than 4 weeks of daptomycin. Clinical success was resolution or improvement of symptoms and no further treatment. Data were analyzed with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Consecutive outpatients (n = 150) with acute osteomyelitis who were treated with oritavancin or daptomycin (1:1) following extensive surgical debridement were identified. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (n = 117). No patient in either group received prior antibiotic therapy (previous 30 days) or was hospitalized within 90 days prior to surgical debridement. Twenty-one (28%) patients prescribed oritavancin had chronic kidney disease, seven of whom were receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. Compared to oritavancin, patients prescribed daptomycin had higher rates of all-cause readmission [odds ratio (OR) 2.89; p < 0.001], more infection-related readmission (OR 3.19; p < 0.001), and greater likelihood of receiving antibiotics post-discontinuation of initial therapy (OR 2.13; p < 0.001). Repeat surgical debridement was required for 68.0% with daptomycin vs. 23.1% with oritavancin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Oritavancin demonstrated a significantly higher rate of clinical success compared to daptomycin, with lower all-cause and infection-related readmissions, reduced need for repeat surgical debridement, and fewer additional antibiotic requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Russell M Petrak
- Metro Infectious Disease Consultants (MIDC), Burr Ridge, IL, 60527, USA
| | - Kairav Shah
- Metro Infectious Disease Consultants (MIDC), Stockbridge, GA, 30281, USA
| | - Melina Diaz
- Metro Infectious Disease Consultants (MIDC), Stockbridge, GA, 30281, USA
| | - Vishnu Chundi
- Metro Infectious Disease Consultants (MIDC), Chicago, IL, 60618, USA
| | - Mark Redell
- Melinta Therapeutics, Medical Affairs, Parsippany-Troy Hills, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Texidor WM, Miller MA, Molina KC, Krsak M, Calvert B, Hart C, Storer M, Fish DN. Oritavancin as sequential therapy for Gram-positive bloodstream infections. BMC Infect Dis 2024; 24:127. [PMID: 38267844 PMCID: PMC10807122 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08725-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oritavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide approved for use in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, has limited data evaluating use in serious infections due to Gram-positive organisms. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of oritavancin for consolidative treatment of Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSI), including infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating adult patients admitted to University of Colorado Hospital from March 2016 to January 2022 who received ≥ 1 oritavancin dose for treatment of Gram-positive BSI. Patients were excluded if the index culture was drawn at an outside facility or were > 89 years of age. The primary outcome was a 90-day composite failure (clinical or microbiological failure) in those with 90-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, acute kidney injury (AKI), infusion-related reactions (IRR), and institutional cost avoidance. RESULTS Overall, 72 patients were included. Mean ± SD age was 54 ± 16 years, 61% were male, and 10% had IE. Organisms most commonly causing BSI were Staphylococcus aureus (68%, 17% methicillin-resistant), followed by Streptococcus spp. (26%), and Enterococcus spp. (10%). Patients received standard-of-care antibiotics before oritavancin for a median (IQR) of 11 (5-17) days. Composite failure in the clinically evaluable population (n = 64) at 90-days occurred in 14% and was composed of clinical and microbiological failure, which occurred in 14% and 5% of patients, respectively. Three patients (4%) experienced AKI after oritavancin, and two (3%) experienced an IRR. Oritavancin utilization resulted in earlier discharge for 94% of patients corresponding to an institutional cost-avoidance of $3,055,804 (mean $44,938/patient) from 1,102 hospital days saved (mean 16 days/patient). CONCLUSIONS The use of oritavancin may be an effective sequential therapy for Gram-positive BSI to facilitate early discharge resulting in institutional cost avoidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Williams Monier Texidor
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Matthew A Miller
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Kyle C Molina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Martin Krsak
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Barbara Calvert
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Caitlin Hart
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Marie Storer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Douglas N Fish
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cafaro A, Barco S, Pigliasco F, Russo C, Mariani M, Mesini A, Saffioti C, Castagnola E, Cangemi G. Therapeutic drug monitoring of glycopeptide antimicrobials: An overview of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab 2024; 31:33-39. [PMID: 38304144 PMCID: PMC10831154 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a critical clinical tool used to optimize the safety and effectiveness of drugs by measuring their concentration in biological fluids. These fluids are primarily plasma or blood. TDM, together with real-time dosage adjustment, contributes highly to the successful management of glycopeptide antimicrobial therapies. Understanding pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties is vital for optimizing antimicrobial therapies, as the efficacy of these therapies depends on both the exposure of the patient to the drug (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters such as the in vitro estimated minimum drug concentration that inhibits bacterial growth (MIC). Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is widely recognized as the gold standard for measuring small molecules, such as antibiotics. This review provides a comprehensive overview of LC-MS/MS methods available for TDM of glycopeptide antibiotics, including vancomycin, teicoplanin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, and telavancin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Cafaro
- Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Section, Central Laboratory of Analysis, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Barco
- Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Section, Central Laboratory of Analysis, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Federica Pigliasco
- Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Section, Central Laboratory of Analysis, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Russo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Mariani
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessio Mesini
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Carolina Saffioti
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Elio Castagnola
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases Unit IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| | - Giuliana Cangemi
- Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Section, Central Laboratory of Analysis, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moenster RP, Wallace-Lacey A, Western H, Tiefenaur S, Abdulbasir A, Alberts J, Doty J, Abner H, Skouby D, Lorenz M, Fong R, Arora J, Linneman TW. Oritavancin vs Standard of Care for Treatment of Nonendovascular Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infections. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad411. [PMID: 37937043 PMCID: PMC10627338 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Data is limited comparing oritavancin (ORT) to the standard-of-care (SOC) for the treatment gram-positive blood stream infections (BSI). Methods This was a retrospective study of all patients in the Veteran's Affairs Health Care System treated with at least 1 dose of oritavancin or at least 5 days of vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin for a documented gram-positive BSI from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2021. Patients with polymicrobial blood cultures or positive cultures from other sites were included if the organisms were sensitive to the incident antimicrobial; no concomitant antimicrobials could be used once the incident agent was started. Individuals were also excluded if they were diagnosed with endocarditis, had a neutrophil count 96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started.The primary composite outcome was clinical failure, defined as all-cause mortality within 30-days from the end of therapy, or blood cultures positive for the incident organisms ≥72 hours after administration of the first dose and ≤30 days after the administration of the final dose of the study antimicrobial, or any drug or line-related readmissions within 30-days of hospital discharge. Results Two hundred-forty patients were identified for screening with 96 meeting criteria (27 in ORT and 69 in SOC groups). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between groups except more patients in the ORT group received >96-hours of treatment before the incident antimicrobial was started (70.3% (19/27) vs 13.04% 9/69); P < .001). The pathogen most prevalent was methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (ORT 33.3% (9/27) vs SOC 46.4% (32/69)). Clinical failure occurred in 7.4% (2/27) in the ORT group and 17.4% (12/69) in SOC (P = .34). No components of the primary outcome were significantly different between groups, but AKI did occur more commonly in the SOC group (27.5% (19/69) vs 3.7% (1/27); P = .01). Conclusions ORT appears to be a safe and effective option when directly compared to the SOC for non-endocarditis BSIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P Moenster
- Clinical Pharmacy Services, VA St Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Hannah Western
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy at UHSP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Seth Tiefenaur
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy at UHSP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Anosha Abdulbasir
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy at UHSP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Justin Alberts
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy at UHSP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jonathan Doty
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy at UHSP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Hartley Abner
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy at UHSP, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Danielle Skouby
- Clinical Pharmacy Services, VA St Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Michael Lorenz
- Clinical Pharmacy Services, VA St Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rebecca Fong
- Clinical Pharmacy Services, VA St Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jyoti Arora
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Travis W Linneman
- Clinical Pharmacy Services, VA St Louis Health Care System, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baiardi G, Cameran Caviglia M, Piras F, Sacco F, Prinapori R, Cristina ML, Mattioli F, Sartini M, Pontali E. The Clinical Efficacy of Multidose Oritavancin: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1498. [PMID: 37887199 PMCID: PMC10604328 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Oritavancin (ORI) is a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide approved as a single 1200 mg dose intravenous infusion for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive organisms in adults. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) linear kinetic profile and long terminal half-life (~393 h) of ORI make it therapeutically attractive for the treatment of other Gram-positive infections for which prolonged therapy is needed. Multidose regimens are adopted in real-world clinical practice with promising results, but aggregated efficacy data are still lacking. A comprehensive search on PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases was performed to include papers published up to the end of January 2023. All articles on ORI multiple doses usage, including case reports, with quantitative data and relevant clinical information were included. Two reviewers independently assessed papers against the inclusion/exclusion criteria and for methodological quality. Differences in opinion were adjudicated by a third party. From 1751 potentially relevant papers identified by this search, a total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria and were processed further in the final data analysis. We extracted data concerning clinical response, bacteriologic response, mortality and adverse events (AEs). From the 16 included papers, 301 cases of treatment with multidose ORIs were identified. Multidose regimens comprised an initial ORI dose of 1200 mg followed by 1200 mg or 800 mg subsequent doses with a varying total number and frequency of reinfusions. The most often treated infections and isolates were osteomyelitis (148; 54.4%), ABSSSI (35; 12.9%) and cellulitis (14; 5.1%); and MRSA (121), MSSA (66), CoNS (17), E. faecalis (13) and E. faecium (12), respectively. Clinical cure and improvement by multidose ORI regimens were observed in 85% (231/272) and 8% (22/272) patients, respectively. Multidose ORI was safe and well tolerated; the most frequent AEs were infusion-related reactions and hypoglycemia. A multidose ORI regimen may be beneficial in treating other Gram-positive infections besides ABSSSIs, with a good safety profile. Further studies are warranted to ascertain the superiority of one multidose ORI scheme or posology over the other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giammarco Baiardi
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.B.); (M.C.C.); (F.P.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Michela Cameran Caviglia
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.B.); (M.C.C.); (F.P.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio Piras
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.B.); (M.C.C.); (F.P.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio Sacco
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.B.); (M.C.C.); (F.P.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Roberta Prinapori
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (R.P.); (E.P.)
| | - Maria Luisa Cristina
- Operating Unit Hospital Hygiene, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (M.L.C.); (M.S.)
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Mattioli
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy; (G.B.); (M.C.C.); (F.P.); (F.S.)
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
| | - Marina Sartini
- Operating Unit Hospital Hygiene, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (M.L.C.); (M.S.)
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Emanuele Pontali
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (R.P.); (E.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carcione D, Intra J, Andriani L, Campanile F, Gona F, Carletti S, Mancini N, Brigante G, Cattaneo D, Baldelli S, Chisari M, Piccirilli A, Di Bella S, Principe L. New Antimicrobials for Gram-Positive Sustained Infections: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1304. [PMID: 37765112 PMCID: PMC10536666 DOI: 10.3390/ph16091304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a public health problem with increasingly alarming data being reported. Gram-positive bacteria are among the protagonists of severe nosocomial and community infections. The objective of this review is to conduct an extensive examination of emerging treatments for Gram-positive infections including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, dalbavancin, oritavancin, omadacycline, tedizolid, and delafloxacin. From a methodological standpoint, a comprehensive analysis on clinical trials, molecular structure, mechanism of action, microbiological targeting, clinical use, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features, and potential for therapeutic drug monitoring will be addressed. Each antibiotic paragraph is divided into specialized microbiological, clinical, and pharmacological sections, including detailed and appropriate tables. A better understanding of the latest promising advances in the field of therapeutic options could lead to the development of a better approach in managing antimicrobial therapy for multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens, which increasingly needs to be better stratified and targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Carcione
- Laboratory of Medicine and Microbiology, Busto Arsizio Hospital—ASST Valle Olona, 21052 Busto Arsizio, VA, Italy; (D.C.); (G.B.)
| | - Jari Intra
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo Dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy;
| | - Lilia Andriani
- Clinical Pathology and Microbiology Unit, Hospital of Sondrio, 23100 Sondrio, Italy;
| | - Floriana Campanile
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Microbiology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy;
| | - Floriana Gona
- Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.G.); (S.C.)
| | - Silvia Carletti
- Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.G.); (S.C.)
| | - Nicasio Mancini
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy;
- Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Virology, Fondazione Macchi University Hospital, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Gioconda Brigante
- Laboratory of Medicine and Microbiology, Busto Arsizio Hospital—ASST Valle Olona, 21052 Busto Arsizio, VA, Italy; (D.C.); (G.B.)
| | - Dario Cattaneo
- Department of Infectious Diseases ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, 20157 Milan, Italy;
| | - Sara Baldelli
- Pharmacology Laboratory, Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Diagnostic Department, ASST Spedali Civili, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Mattia Chisari
- Microbiology and Virology Unit, Great Metropolitan Hospital “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli”, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy;
| | - Alessandra Piccirilli
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Stefano Di Bella
- Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical, and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34129 Trieste, Italy;
| | - Luigi Principe
- Microbiology and Virology Unit, Great Metropolitan Hospital “Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli”, 89100 Reggio Calabria, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cairns KA, Udy AA, Peel TN, Abbott IJ, Dooley MJ, Peleg AY. Therapeutics for Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2023; 36:e0005922. [PMID: 37067406 PMCID: PMC10283489 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00059-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSIs) with high morbidity and mortality rates. They are pathogens of global concern with a limited treatment pipeline. Significant challenges exist in the management of VRE BSI, including drug dosing, the emergence of resistance, and the optimal treatment for persistent bacteremia and infective endocarditis. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for antimicrobial therapy is evolving for VRE-active agents; however, there are significant gaps in the literature for predicting antimicrobial efficacy for VRE BSIs. To date, TDM has the greatest evidence for predicting drug toxicity for the three main VRE-active antimicrobial agents daptomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin. This article presents an overview of the treatment options for VRE BSIs, the role of antimicrobial dose optimization through TDM in supporting clinical infection management, and challenges and perspectives for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A. Cairns
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew A. Udy
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Trisha N. Peel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Iain J. Abbott
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Microbiology Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael J. Dooley
- Pharmacy Department, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Medicines Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anton Y. Peleg
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Infection Program, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Microbiology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre to Impact AMR, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lupia T, De Benedetto I, Bosio R, Shbaklo N, De Rosa FG, Corcione S. Role of Oritavancin in the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis, Catheter- or Device-Related Infections, Bloodstream Infections, and Bone and Prosthetic Joint Infections in Humans: Narrative Review and Possible Developments. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13040959. [PMID: 37109488 PMCID: PMC10143027 DOI: 10.3390/life13040959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Oritavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide with in vitro activity against Gram-positive pathogens, as well as good bactericidal activity and sterilisation ability in biofilm. It has been approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), but recent reports have demonstrated possible off-label uses, such as for vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), deep-seated infections including those involving prosthetic material and invasive infections. The aim of this work is to review the uses of oritavancin outside of ABSSSI, focusing on its real-life applications on infective endocarditis, catheter- or device-related infections, bloodstream infections, and bone and prosthetic joint infections in humans, as well as possible future applications. We performed a narrative review, collecting the literature published between 1 December 2002 and 1 November 2022 on PubMed and the Cochrane Library using the term 'oritavancin'. Available studies have shown how effective it is in different settings, suggesting an opportunity for step-down strategies or outpatient management of infections requiring a long duration of antibiotic treatment. So far, evidence is still scarce, and limited to a few studies and case reports, mostly focusing on Staphylococcus aureus as the major isolate. Concerns about fluid intake for dilution and interaction with coagulation markers also need to be taken into account. Further studies are required in order to assess the safety and effectiveness of Oritavancin in vascular, prosthetic, or device-related infections, as well as in resistant Gram-positive bacteria or enterococcal infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Lupia
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Cardinal Massaia, 14100 Asti, Italy
| | - Ilaria De Benedetto
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Bosio
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Nour Shbaklo
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Cardinal Massaia, 14100 Asti, Italy
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Corcione
- Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
- School of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meng L, Mui E, Ha DR, Stave C, Deresinski SC, Holubar M. Comprehensive guidance for antibiotic dosing in obese adults: 2022 update. Pharmacotherapy 2023; 43:226-246. [PMID: 36703246 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Drug dosing in obese patients continues to be challenging due to a lack of high-quality evidence to guide dosing recommendations. We first published guidance for antibiotic dosing in obese adults in 2017, in which we critically reviewed articles identified from a broad search strategy to develop dosing recommendations for 35 antimicrobials. In this updated narrative review, we searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using Medical Subject Headings including anti-infectives, specific generic antimicrobial names, obese, pharmacokinetics, and others. We reviewed 393 articles, cross-referenced select cited references, and when applicable, referenced drug databases, package inserts, and clinical trial data to update dosing recommendations for 41 antimicrobials. Most included articles were pharmacokinetic studies, other less frequently included articles were clinical studies (mostly small, retrospective), case reports, and very rarely, guidelines. Pharmacokinetic changes are frequently reported, can be variable, and sometimes conflicting in this population, and do not always translate to a documented difference in clinical outcomes, yet are used to inform dosing strategies. Extended infusions, high doses, and therapeutic drug monitoring remain important strategies to optimize dosing in this population. Additional studies are needed to clinically validate proposed dosing strategies, clarify optimal body size descriptors, dosing weight scalars, and estimation method of renal function in obese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Meng
- Department of Quality, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Emily Mui
- Department of Quality, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David R Ha
- Department of Quality, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Christopher Stave
- Lane Medical Library, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Stan C Deresinski
- Department of Quality, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Marisa Holubar
- Department of Quality, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.,Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jean SS, Liu IM, Hsieh PC, Kuo DH, Liu YL, Hsueh PR. Off-label use versus formal recommendations of conventional and novel antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2023; 61:106763. [PMID: 36804370 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
The infections caused by multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR, XDR) bacteria, including Gram-positive cocci (GPC, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MDR-Streptococcus pneumoniae and vancomycin-resistant enterococci) and Gram-negative bacilli (GNB, including carbapenem-resistant [CR] Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa and XDR/CR-Acinetobacter baumannii complex) can be quite challenging for physicians with respect to treatment decisions. Apart from complicated urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections (cUTIs, cIAIs), bloodstream infections and pneumonia, these difficult-to-treat bacteria also cause infections at miscellaneous sites (bones, joints, native/prosthetic valves and skin structures, etc.). Antibiotics like dalbavancin, oritavancin, telavancin and daptomycin are currently approved for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structural infections (ABSSSIs) caused by GPC. Additionally, ceftaroline, linezolid and tigecycline have been formally approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and ABSSSI. Cefiderocol and meropenem-vaborbactam are currently approved for the treatment of cUTIs caused by XDR-GNB. The spectra of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam are broader than that of ceftolozane-tazobactam, but these three antibiotics are currently approved for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, cIAIs and cUTIs caused by MDR-GNB. Clinical investigations of other novel antibiotics (including cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam and sulbactam-durlobactam) for the treatment of various infections are ongoing. Nevertheless, evidence for adequate antibiotic regimens against osteomyelitis, arthritis and infective endocarditis due to several GPC and MDR-GNB is still mostly lacking. A comprehensive review of PubMed publications was undertaken and the formal indications and off-label use of important conventional and novel antibiotics against MDR/XDR-GPC and GNB isolates cultured from miscellaneous sites are presented in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shio-Shin Jean
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Critical Care Medicine, Min-Sheng General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Health care, Tajen University, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - I-Min Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Health care, Tajen University, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Po-Chuen Hsieh
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Health care, Tajen University, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Dai-Huang Kuo
- Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy and Health care, Tajen University, Pingtung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Lien Liu
- Department of Family Medicine, Min-Sheng General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Public Health, Taoyuan City Government, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ren Hsueh
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; PhD Program for Aging, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mougakou E, Mastrogianni E, Kyziroglou M, Tziomalos K. The Role of Novel Antibiotics in the Management of Diabetic Foot Infection. Diabetes Ther 2023; 14:251-263. [PMID: 36565422 PMCID: PMC9944220 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01357-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetic foot infection is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus. Antibiotic treatment is the cornerstone of management of diabetic foot infection but the rising prevalence of antibiotic resistance has resulted in increasing rates of treatment failure. In this context, the development of several novel antibiotics might represent a useful tool in severe diabetic foot infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. In the present review, we summarize the safety and efficacy of novel antibiotics in patients with diabetic foot infection. Relevant data are limited, and randomized controlled studies that evaluated the role of these agents in this field are lacking. Until more robust data are available, cefiderocol and dalbavancin, which have been studied more extensively in patients with bone infections, might be attractive options in carefully selected patients with severe diabetic foot infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efterpi Mougakou
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Elpida Mastrogianni
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Kyziroglou
- First Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, 1 Stilponos Kyriakidi Street, 54636, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Tziomalos
- First Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA Hospital, 1 Stilponos Kyriakidi Street, 54636, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jackson BT, Cluck DB, Henao-Martínez AF, Chastain DB. Kimyrsa and Orbactiv - A Tale of Two Formulations. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:737-742. [PMID: 36923104 PMCID: PMC10010140 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s324285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Kimyrsa is a new formulation (NF) of the original formulation of oritavancin ([OF] Orbactiv). Comparatively, the obvious benefit with this product is the shortened infusion time and flexibility with solution compatibility, but otherwise maintains a similar pharmacokinetic and microbiologic profile. At present, the NF lacks significant real-world experience relative to other available lipoglycopeptides and thus its place in therapy remains difficult to predict but would not be expected to be significantly different than its OF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany T Jackson
- Department of Pharmacy, Mount Sinai Morningside, New York, NY, 10025, USA
| | - David B Cluck
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Bill Gatton College of Pharmacy East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, 37614, USA
| | - Andrés F Henao-Martínez
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Daniel B Chastain
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Albany, GA, 31701, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022; 66:e0261420. [PMID: 35475634 DOI: 10.1128/aac.02614-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The long-acting lipoglycopeptides (LGPs) dalbavancin and oritavancin are semisynthetic antimicrobials with broad and potent activity against Gram-positive bacterial pathogens. While they are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections, their pharmacological properties suggest a potential role of these agents for the treatment of deep-seated and severe infections, such as bloodstream and bone and joint infections. The use of these antimicrobials is particularly appealing when prolonged therapy, early discharge, and avoidance of long-term intravascular catheter access are desirable or when multidrug-resistant bacteria are suspected. This review describes the current evidence for the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin in the treatment of invasive infections, as well as the hurdles that are preventing their optimal use. Moreover, this review discusses the current knowledge gaps that need to be filled to understand the potential role of LGPs in highly needed clinical scenarios and the ongoing clinical studies that aim to address these voids in the upcoming years.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hoover RK, Krsak M, Molina KC, Shah K, Redell M. Kimyrsa, An Oritavancin-Containing Product: Clinical Study and Review of Properties. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac090. [PMID: 35392455 PMCID: PMC8982769 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a need for improved antibiotic formulations for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and soft structure infection (ABSSSI), especially with the rise of antimicrobial resistance among Gram-positive bacteria. A new formulation of oritavancin was developed to reduce intravenous infusion volume (from 1000 mL to 250 mL), shorten infusion time (from 3 hours to 1 hour), and provide pharmacies with flexibility in oritavancin preparation (from 5% dextrose in sterile water to either normal saline or 5% dextrose in sterile water) compared with the current formulation. Methods A total of 102 adult patients with a diagnosis of ABSSSI suspected or confirmed to be caused by a Gram-positive pathogen were randomized 1:1 to receive either the new formulation of oritavancin or the current formulation. After a single 1200-mg intravenous infusion of oritavancin, the relative area-under-the-curve exposure of the new formulation and current formulation groups were compared. Safety and tolerability of the new formulation were assessed for treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and changes to laboratory parameters. Results The area under the curve for 0 hour to 72 hours postdose was very similar in the new formulation group compared with the current formulation group. No differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed between the current and new formulation groups, and all treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of the current formulation. Conclusions The new formulation of oritavancin with reduced volume and duration of intravenous infusion demonstrates a safety profile and pharmacokinetics similar to that of the original formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Krsak
- Assistant Professor of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kyle C Molina
- University of Colorado Hospital, Assistant Clinical Professor, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kairav Shah
- Metro Infectious Disease Consultants, Stockbridge, GA, USA
| | - Mark Redell
- Medical Affairs, Melinta Therapeutics, Morristown, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gatti M, Barnini S, Guarracino F, Parisio EM, Spinicci M, Viaggi B, D’Arienzo S, Forni S, Galano A, Gemmi F. Orthopaedic Implant-Associated Staphylococcal Infections: A Critical Reappraisal of Unmet Clinical Needs Associated with the Implementation of the Best Antibiotic Choice. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11030406. [PMID: 35326869 PMCID: PMC8944676 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11030406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Infections associated with orthopaedic implants represent a major health concern characterized by a remarkable incidence of morbidity and mortality. The wide variety of clinical scenarios encountered in the heterogeneous world of infections associated with orthopaedic implants makes the implementation of an optimal and standardized antimicrobial treatment challenging. Antibiotic bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and drug choice/dosage regimens favouring outpatient management (i.e., long-acting or oral agents) play a major role in regards to the chronic evolution of these infections. The aim of this multidisciplinary opinion article is to summarize evidence supporting the use of the different anti-staphylococcal agents in terms of microbiological and pharmacological optimization according to bone penetration, anti-biofilm activity, long-term safety, and feasibility for outpatient regimens, and to provide a useful guide for clinicians in the management of patients affected by staphylococcal infections associated with orthopaedic implants Novel long-acting lipoglycopeptides, and particularly dalbavancin, alone or in combination with rifampicin, could represent the best antibiotic choice according to real-world evidence and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties. The implementation of a multidisciplinary taskforce and close cooperation between microbiologists and clinicians is crucial for providing the best care in this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milo Gatti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
- SSD Clinical Pharmacology, Department for Integrated Infectious Risk Management, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Barnini
- Bacteriology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Fabio Guarracino
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Eva Maria Parisio
- UOSD Microbiologia Arezzo PO San Donato, Azienda Usl Toscana Sud Est, 52100 Arezzo, Italy;
| | - Michele Spinicci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy;
- Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Bruno Viaggi
- Neurointensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Sara D’Arienzo
- Agenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, 50141 Florence, Italy; (S.D.); (S.F.)
| | - Silvia Forni
- Agenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, 50141 Florence, Italy; (S.D.); (S.F.)
| | - Angelo Galano
- SOD Microbiologia e Virologia, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Gemmi
- Agenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana, 50141 Florence, Italy; (S.D.); (S.F.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eckmann C, Tulkens PM. Current and future options for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections: focus on fluoroquinolones and long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:iv9-iv22. [PMID: 34849999 PMCID: PMC8632788 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections are among the most common bacterial infections and constitute a major burden for patients and healthcare systems. Care is complicated by the variety of potential pathogens, some with resistance to previously effective antimicrobial agents, the wide spectrum of clinical presentations and the risk of progression to life-threatening forms. More-efficient care pathways are needed that can reduce hospital admissions and length of stay, while maintaining a high quality of care and adhering to antimicrobial stewardship principles. Several agents approved recently for treating acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections have characteristics that meet these requirements. We address the clinical and pharmacological characteristics of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolone delafloxacin, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptide agents dalbavancin and oritavancin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Eckmann
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Klinikum Hannoversch-Muenden, Goettingen University, Germany
| | - Paul M Tulkens
- Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Recent Updates in Antimicrobial Stewardship in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2021; 23:24. [PMID: 34776793 PMCID: PMC8577634 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-021-00766-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Antimicrobial stewardship within acute care is common and has been expanding to outpatient areas. Some inpatient antimicrobial stewardship tactics apply to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) and complex outpatient antimicrobial therapy (COpAT) management, but differences do exist. Recent Findings OPAT/COpAT is a growing area of practice and research with its own unique considerations for antimicrobial stewardship. Potential ideas for antimicrobial stewardship in the OPAT/COpAT setting include redesigning the regimen to COpAT instead of OPAT, ensuring the use of the shortest effective duration of antimicrobial therapy; using antimicrobials dosed less frequently, such as long-acting glycopeptides; optimizing antimicrobial susceptibility testing reporting for common OPAT/COpAT drugs; and establishing routine laboratory and safety monitoring. Future consensus is needed to determine validated OPAT program metrics and outcomes. Summary As more focus is placed on outpatient antimicrobial stewardship, clinicians practicing in OPAT should publish more data regarding OPAT program methods and outcomes as they relate to antimicrobial stewardship. These can involve patient clinical outcomes, OPAT readmission rates, OPAT therapy completion, and central line-related complications.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gruss ZP, Baumeister T, Smith J. The Use of Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for the Treatment of Serious, Off-label Infections: a Review of the Literature. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s11908-021-00764-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
20
|
Role or oritavancin and dalbavancin in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and other potential indications. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2021; 34:96-108. [PMID: 33405480 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To discuss the currently available evidence about the use oritavancin and dalbavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and for other potential indications. RECENT FINDINGS In this review, we briefly summarize the available data on efficacy (from randomized controlled trials) and on effectiveness and cure rates (from observational studies) pertaining to the use of oritavancin and dalbavancin either for ABSSSI or for other indications. SUMMARY Oritavancin and dalbavancin are valid options for outpatient therapy and early discharge in patients with ABSSSI, especially when adherence to oral therapy cannot be guaranteed or no oral choices are available. Furthermore, it is worth noting that a non-negligible portion (sometimes the majority) of oritavancin and dalbavancin use in available real-life experiences is for indications other than ABSSSI, especially for Gram-positive osteomyelitis and endocarditis. The number of studies on the use of long-acting lipoglycopeptides for these currently off-label indications is rapidly increasing and will help to further optimize the use of these peculiar antibiotics in the forthcoming future.
Collapse
|
21
|
Chahine EB, Dougherty JA, Thornby KA, Guirguis EH. Antibiotic Approvals in the Last Decade: Are We Keeping Up With Resistance? Ann Pharmacother 2021; 56:441-462. [PMID: 34259076 DOI: 10.1177/10600280211031390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the spectrum of activity, efficacy, safety, and role in therapy of all antibiotics and related biologics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the last decade. DATA SOURCES A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (2010 to end May 2021) with the search terms' name of the antibiotic or the biologic. Data were also obtained from the prescribing information, FDA, and ClinicalTrials.gov websites. STUDY SELECTION All relevant English-language, late phase clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of the identified drugs were included. Review articles and references of retrieved articles were evaluated for relevant data. DATA SYNTHESIS Antibiotic resistance is a public health crisis, and antibiotic development is imperative to outpace the ability of bacteria to develop resistance. Only 17 new systemic antibiotics and 1 related biologic have been approved by the FDA since 2010. Among these drugs, 14 were approved for common bacterial infections, 1 was approved for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), 1 was licensed to prevent CDI recurrence, and 2 were approved for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Very few antibiotics are in clinical development. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE The arrival of these new antibiotics was welcomed with great enthusiasm, particularly when they met previously unmet medical needs. Unfortunately, the majority of them represent modifications to existing chemical structures rather than new drug classes. Despite the availability of these antibiotics, managing patients with deep-seated infections and those with extensively resistant gram-negative organisms remains challenging. CONCLUSIONS The number of new antibiotics and their indications are not keeping up with resistance and the needs of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias B Chahine
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Gregory School of Pharmacy, FL, USA
| | - John A Dougherty
- Palm Beach Atlantic University Gregory School of Pharmacy, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
New-Generation Antibiotics for Treatment of Gram-Positive Infections: A Review with Focus on Endocarditis and Osteomyelitis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10081743. [PMID: 33920526 PMCID: PMC8074169 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10081743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections are mostly caused by Gram-positive bacteria. They are often difficult to treat and are associated with a poor prognosis. In the past 20 years, nine antibiotic drugs with predominant activity against Gram-positive bacteria have been introduced and approved by the Food and Drug Administration or the European Medicines Agency: ceftaroline, daptomycin, telavancin, dalbavancin, oritavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, delafloxacin, and omadacycline. This narrative review aims to provide an overview on these antibiotics with a special focus on their use in infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and osteosynthesis-associated infections. Although some of these approved antibiotics are promising, they should not be used as first- or second-line therapy, awaiting more clinical data.
Collapse
|
23
|
Meyer J, Lata P, Barnett S. Continued Dosing of Oritavancin for Complicated Gram-Positive Infections. Fed Pract 2020; 37:502-504. [PMID: 33328715 DOI: 10.12788/fp.0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Several retrospective and cohort analyses have suggested that continued dosing of oritavancin is both safe and efficacious for complicated Gram-positive infections, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi Meyer
- is a Doctor of Pharmacy candidate, and is an Associate Professor of Pharmacy, both at the University of Wisconsin. and Susanne Barnett are Clinical Pharmacists at William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital in Madison
| | - Paul Lata
- is a Doctor of Pharmacy candidate, and is an Associate Professor of Pharmacy, both at the University of Wisconsin. and Susanne Barnett are Clinical Pharmacists at William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital in Madison
| | - Susanne Barnett
- is a Doctor of Pharmacy candidate, and is an Associate Professor of Pharmacy, both at the University of Wisconsin. and Susanne Barnett are Clinical Pharmacists at William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital in Madison
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Successful treatment of a prosthetic hip infection due to Enterococcus faecalis with sequential dosing of oritavancin and prosthesis preservation without prosthetic joint surgical manipulation. IDCases 2020; 22:e00949. [PMID: 32983892 PMCID: PMC7494443 DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e00949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A patient with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) complicated with deep surgical site infection due to vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis. The initial treatment consisted of 10 days with daptomycin plus ampicillin. The hip prosthesis was retained and salvaged with six outpatient sequential doses of oritavancin 1200 mg every seven days without intra-articular irrigation or other surgical interventions. The patient was ambulating independently without symptoms after ten months of the last treatment of oritavancin.
Collapse
|
25
|
Krsak M, Morrisette T, Miller M, Molina K, Huang M, Damioli L, Pisney L, Wong M, Poeschla E. Advantages of Outpatient Treatment with Long-Acting Lipoglycopeptides for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: A Review. Pharmacotherapy 2020; 40:469-478. [PMID: 32239771 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of serious gram-positive infections presents multiple challenges. Treatment often results in prolonged hospitalization for administration of intravenous antimicrobials and presents an inefficient use of hospital resources. Prolonged hospitalization is typically also unfavorable to patient preferences and potentially subjects patients to additional health care-associated complications. Current strategies of transition to outpatient settings-outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and use of oral antibiotics-often do not adequately serve vulnerable populations for whom there is often no alternative to inpatient therapy. Specifically, people who use drugs, those who cannot reliably adhere to unsupervised treatment (poor mental or physical health), people with complicating life circumstances (e.g., homelessness, incarceration, rural location), and those with inadequate health insurance remain hospitalized for weeks longer than persons without such conditions. We suspected that long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGP), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, may be useful in patient transitions to outpatient settings. Thus, we conducted a search of the peer-reviewed literature using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. Based on accumulating literature, it appears that laLGPs offer a reliable alternative therapeutic strategy that addresses many of the personal and systemic barriers to the traditional transitioning approaches. Current evidence also suggests that these agents may be cost-effective from patient, payer, and hospital perspectives. Barriers to broader use of laLGPs include, among others, a relative lack of prospective data regarding efficacy in serious infections, a narrow United States Food and Drug Administration-approved indication restricted to only acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and lack of reimbursement infrastructure for inpatient settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Krsak
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Taylor Morrisette
- Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Matthew Miller
- Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Kyle Molina
- Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Misha Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Laura Damioli
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Larissa Pisney
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Megan Wong
- Department of Pharmacy-Orthopedics, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Eric Poeschla
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|