1
|
Vasconcellos FDN, Almeida T, Müller Fiedler A, Fountain H, Santos Piedade G, Monaco BA, Jagid J, Cordeiro JG. Robotic-Assisted Stereoelectroencephalography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety, Outcomes, and Precision in Refractory Epilepsy Patients. Cureus 2023; 15:e47675. [PMID: 38021558 PMCID: PMC10672406 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Robotic assistance in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) holds promising potential for enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and safety during electrode placement and surgical procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration, delves into the latest advancements and implications of robotic systems in SEEG, while meticulously evaluating outcomes and safety measures. Among 855 patients suffering from medication-refractory epilepsy who underwent SEEG in 29 studies, averaging 24.6 years in age, the most prevalent robots employed were robotic surgical assistant (ROSA) (450 patients), Neuromate (207), Sinovation (140), and ISys1 (58). A total of 8,184 electrodes were successfully implanted, with an average operative time of 157.2 minutes per procedure and 15.1 minutes per electrode, resulting in an overall mean operative time of 157.7 minutes across all studies. Notably, the mean target point error (TPE) stood at 2.13 mm, the mean entry point error (EPE) at 1.48 mm, and postoperative complications occurred in 7.69% of robotically assisted (RA) SEEG cases (60), with 85% of these complications being asymptomatic. This comprehensive analysis underscores the safety and efficacy of RA-SEEG in patients with medication-refractory epilepsy, characterized by low complication rates, reduced operative time, and precise electrode placement, supporting its widespread adoption in clinical practice, with no discernible differences noted among the various robotic systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timoteo Almeida
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, USA
| | | | - Hayes Fountain
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, USA
| | | | - Bernardo A Monaco
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, CDF (Clinica de Dor e Funcional), Sao Paulo, BRA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BRA
| | - Jonathan Jagid
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gorbachuk M, Machetanz K, Weinbrenner E, Grimm F, Wuttke TV, Wang S, Ethofer S, Tatagiba M, Rona S, Honegger J, Naros G. Robot-assisted stereoencephalography vs subdural electrodes in the evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia Open 2023; 8:888-897. [PMID: 37149851 PMCID: PMC10472365 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Invasive video-electroencephalography (iVEEG) is the gold standard for evaluation of refractory temporal lobe epilepsy before second stage resective surgery (SSRS). Traditionally, the presumed seizure onset zone (SOZ) has been covered with subdural electrodes (SDE), a very invasive procedure prone to complications. Temporal stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) with conventional frame-based stereotaxy is time-consuming and impeded by the geometry of the frame. The introduction of robotic assistance promised a simplification of temporal SEEG implantation. However, the efficacy of temporal SEEG in iVEEG remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the efficiency and efficacy of SEEG in iVEEG of temporal lobe epilepsy. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 60 consecutive patients with medically intractable epilepsy who underwent iVEEG of a potential temporal SOZ by SDE (n = 40) or SEEG (n = 20). Surgical time efficiency was analyzed by the skin-to-skin time (STS) and the total procedure time (TPT) and compared between groups (SDE vs SEEG). Surgical risk was depicted by the 90-day complication rate. Temporal SOZ were treated by SSRS. Favorable outcome (Engel°1) was assessed after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS Robot-assisted SEEG significantly reduced the duration of surgery (STS and TPT) compared to SDE implantations. There was no significant difference in complication rates. Notably, all surgical revisions in this study were attributed to SDE. Unilateral temporal SOZ was detected in 34/60 cases. Of the 34 patients, 30 underwent second stage SSRS. Both SDE and SEEG had a good predictive value for the outcome of temporal SSRS with no significant group difference. SIGNIFICANCE Robot-assisted SEEG improves the accessibility of the temporal lobe for iVEEG by increasing surgical time efficiency and by simplifying trajectory selection without losing its predictive value for SSRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mykola Gorbachuk
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Kathrin Machetanz
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Eliane Weinbrenner
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Florian Grimm
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Thomas V. Wuttke
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Sophie Wang
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Silke Ethofer
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Marcos Tatagiba
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Sabine Rona
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Jürgen Honegger
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| | - Georgios Naros
- Neurosurgical Clinic, Department of Neurosurgery and NeurotechnologyEberhard Karls UniversityTuebingenGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yindeedej V, Uda T, Kawashima T, Koh S, Tanoue Y, Kojima Y, Goto T. Electrode Tip Shift During the Stereotactic Electroencephalography Evaluation Period with Boltless Suture Fixation. World Neurosurg 2023; 175:e1210-e1219. [PMID: 37427700 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electrodes for stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) are typically fixed to the skull with anchor bolts. When anchor bolts are unavailable, electrodes have to be fixed using other methods, carrying the possibility of electrode shift. This study, therefore, evaluated the characteristics of electrode tip shift during SEEG monitoring in patients with electrodes fixed using the suture technique. METHODS We retrospectively included patients who underwent SEEG implantation with suture fixation and evaluated the tip shift distance (TSD) of electrodes. Possible influences evaluated included: 1) implantation period, 2) lobe of entry, 3) unilateral or bilateral implantation, 4) electrode length, 5) skull thickness, and 6) scalp thickness difference. RESULTS A total of 50 electrodes in 7 patients were evaluated. TSD was 1.4 ± 2.0 mm (mean ± standard deviation). Implantation period was 8.1 ± 2.2 days. Entry lobe was frontal for 28 electrodes and temporal for 22 electrodes. Implantation was bilateral for 25 electrodes and unilateral for 25 electrodes. Electrode length was 45.4 ± 14.3 mm. Skull thickness was 6.0 ± 3.7 mm. Scalp thickness difference was -1.5 ± 2.1 mm, which was found greater in temporal lobe entry compared with frontal lobe entry. According to univariate analyses, neither implantation period nor electrode length correlated with TSD. Multivariate regression analysis showed that only greater scalp thickness difference correlated significantly with greater TSD (P = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS Greater scalp thickness difference correlated with greater TSD. Surgeons need to consider the degree of scalp thickness difference and electrode shift when using suture fixation, especially with temporal lobe entry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vich Yindeedej
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Thammasat University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Takehiro Uda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Toshiyuki Kawashima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Saya Koh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuta Tanoue
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Kojima
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeo Goto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Molnar-Szakacs I, Uddin LQ. Anterior insula as a gatekeeper of executive control. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2022; 139:104736. [PMID: 35700753 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Executive control is a complex high-level cognitive function that relies on distributed brain circuitry. We propose that the anterior insular cortex plays an under-appreciated role in executive processes, acting as a gatekeeper to other brain regions and networks by virtue of primacy of action and effective connectivity. The flexible functional profile of the anterior insular subdivision renders it a key hub within the broader midcingulo-insular 'salience network', allowing it to orchestrate and drive activity of other major functional brain networks including the medial frontoparietal 'default mode network' and lateral frontoparietal 'central executive network'. The microanatomy and large-scale connectivity of the insular cortex positions it to play a critical role in triaging and integrating internal and external multisensory stimuli in the service of initiating higher-order control functions. Multiple lines of evidence scaffold the novel hypothesis that, as a key hub for integration and a lever of network switching, the anterior insula serves as a critical gatekeeper to executive control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucina Q Uddin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mavridis IN, Lo WB, Wimalachandra WSB, Philip S, Agrawal S, Scott C, Martin-Lamb D, Carr B, Bill P, Lawley A, Seri S, Walsh AR. Pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: effects of robot assistance and other variables on seizure outcome and complications. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 28:404-415. [PMID: 34298516 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.peds20810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) has been investigated; however, most studies have not differentiated pediatric and adult populations, which have different anatomy and physiology. The purpose of this study was to assess SEEG safety in the pediatric setting, focusing on surgical complications and the identification of patient and surgical risk factors, if any. The authors also aimed to determine whether robot assistance in SEEG was associated with a change in practice, surgical parameters, and clinical outcomes. METHODS The authors retrospectively studied all SEEG cases performed in their department from December 2014 to March 2020. They analyzed both demographic and surgical variables and noted the types of surgery-related complications and their management. They also studied the clinical outcomes of a subset of the patients in relation to robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted SEEG. RESULTS Sixty-three children had undergone 64 SEEG procedures. Girls were on average 3 years younger than the boys (mean age 11.1 vs 14.1 years, p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 6.3%, and the complication rate for patients with left-sided electrodes was higher than that for patients with right-sided electrodes (11.1% vs 3.3%), although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The duration of recording was positively correlated to the number of implanted electrodes (r = 0.296, p < 0.05). Robot assistance was associated with a higher number of implanted electrodes (mean 12.6 vs 7.6 electrodes, p < 0.0001). Robot-assisted implantations were more accurate, with a mean error of 1.51 mm at the target compared to 2.98 mm in nonrobot implantations (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were assessed in the first 32 patients treated (16 in the nonrobot group and 16 in the robot group), 23 of whom proceeded to further resective surgery. The children who had undergone robot-assisted SEEG had better eventual seizure control following subsequent epilepsy surgery. Of the children who had undergone resective epilepsy surgery, 42% (5/12) in the nonrobot group and 82% (9/11) in the robot group obtained an Engel class IA outcome at 1 year (χ2 = 3.885, p = 0.049). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the robot group had a higher seizure-free rate than the nonrobot group at 30 months postoperation (7/11 vs 2/12, p = 0.063). Two complications, whose causes were attributed to the implantation and head-bandaging steps, required surgical intervention. All complications were either transient or reversible. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest single-center, exclusively pediatric SEEG series that includes robot assistance so far. SEEG complications are uncommon and usually transient or treatable. Robot assistance enabled implantation of more electrodes and improved epilepsy surgery outcomes, as compared to those in the non-robot-assisted cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Caroline Scott
- 3Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darren Martin-Lamb
- 3Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Bryony Carr
- 3Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Bill
- 3Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Lawley
- 3Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stefano Seri
- 3Neurophysiology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kleen JK, Speidel BA, Baud MO, Rao VR, Ammanuel SG, Hamilton LS, Chang EF, Knowlton RC. Accuracy of omni-planar and surface casting of epileptiform activity for intracranial seizure localization. Epilepsia 2021; 62:947-959. [PMID: 33634855 PMCID: PMC8276628 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Intracranial electroencephalography (ICEEG) recordings are performed for seizure localization in medically refractory epilepsy. Signal quantifications such as frequency power can be projected as heatmaps on personalized three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed cortical surfaces to distill these complex recordings into intuitive cinematic visualizations. However, simultaneously reconciling deep recording locations and reliably tracking evolving ictal patterns remain significant challenges. METHODS We fused oblique magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices along depth probe trajectories with cortical surface reconstructions and projected dynamic heatmaps using a simple mathematical metric of epileptiform activity (line-length). This omni-planar and surface casting of epileptiform activity approach (OPSCEA) thus illustrated seizure onset and spread among both deep and superficial locations simultaneously with minimal need for signal processing supervision. We utilized the approach on 41 patients at our center implanted with grid, strip, and/or depth electrodes for localizing medically refractory seizures. Peri-ictal data were converted into OPSCEA videos with multiple 3D brain views illustrating all electrode locations. Five people of varying expertise in epilepsy (medical student through epilepsy attending level) attempted to localize the seizure-onset zones. RESULTS We retrospectively compared this approach with the original ICEEG study reports for validation. Accuracy ranged from 73.2% to 97.6% for complete or overlapping onset lobe(s), respectively, and ~56.1% to 95.1% for the specific focus (or foci). Higher answer certainty for a given case predicted better accuracy, and scorers had similar accuracy across different training levels. SIGNIFICANCE In an era of increasing stereo-EEG use, cinematic visualizations fusing omni-planar and surface functional projections appear to provide a useful adjunct for interpreting complex intracranial recordings and subsequent surgery planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan K Kleen
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Benjamin A Speidel
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Maxime O Baud
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vikram R Rao
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Simon G Ammanuel
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Liberty S Hamilton
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences and Department of Neurology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Edward F Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert C Knowlton
- Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Faraji AH, Remick M, Abel TJ. Contributions of Robotics to the Safety and Efficacy of Invasive Monitoring With Stereoelectroencephalography. Front Neurol 2020; 11:570010. [PMID: 33391145 PMCID: PMC7772229 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.570010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to provide a discussion of the history and utility of robotics in invasive monitoring for epilepsy surgery using stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG). The authors conducted a literature review of available sources to describe how the advent of surgical robotics has improved the efficacy and ease of performing sEEG surgery. The sEEG method integrates anatomic, electrographic, and clinical information to test hypotheses regarding the localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) and has been used in Europe since the 1950s. One of the primary benefits of robot-assisted sEEG implantation techniques is the ability to seamlessly transition between both orthogonal and oblique trajectory types using a single technique. Based on available information, it is our view that, when applied appropriately, robotic sEEG can have a low rate of complications and many advantages over both non-robotic sEEG implantation and traditional craniotomy-based invasive monitoring methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Faraji
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Madison Remick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Taylor J Abel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.,Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
De Barros A, Zaldivar-Jolissaint JF, Hoffmann D, Job-Chapron AS, Minotti L, Kahane P, De Schlichting E, Chabardès S. Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Insular Stereo-Electro-Encephalography: A Review. Front Neurol 2020; 11:1033. [PMID: 33041978 PMCID: PMC7527495 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.01033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereo-electro-encephalography (SEEG) is an invasive, surgical, and electrophysiological method for three-dimensional registration and mapping of seizure activity in drug-resistant epilepsy. It allows the accurate analysis of spatio-temporal seizure activity by multiple intraparenchymal depth electrodes. The technique requires rigorous non-invasive pre-SEEG evaluation (clinical, video-EEG, and neuroimaging investigations) in order to plan the insertion of the SEEG electrodes with minimal risk and maximal recording accuracy. The resulting recordings are used to precisely define the surgical limits of resection of the epileptogenic zone in relation to adjacent eloquent structures. Since the initial description of the technique by Talairach and Bancaud in the 1950's, several techniques of electrode insertion have been used with accuracy and relatively few complications. In the last decade, robot-assisted surgery has emerged as a safe, accurate, and time-saving electrode insertion technique due to its unparalleled potential for orthogonal and oblique insertion trajectories, guided by rigorous computer-assisted planning. SEEG exploration of the insular cortex remains difficult due to its anatomical location, hidden by the temporal and frontoparietal opercula. Furthermore, the close vicinity of Sylvian vessels makes surgical electrode insertion challenging. Some epilepsy surgery teams remain cautious about insular exploration due to the potential of neurovascular injury. However, several authors have published encouraging results regarding the technique's accuracy and safety in both children and adults. We will review the indications, techniques, and outcomes of insular SEEG exploration with emphasis on robot-assisted implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amaury De Barros
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Dominique Hoffmann
- CHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurosurgery, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Lorella Minotti
- CHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurology, Grenoble, France
| | - Philippe Kahane
- CHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurology, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Stephan Chabardès
- CHU Grenoble Alpes, Clinical University of Neurosurgery, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Joswig H, Lau JC, Abdallat M, Parrent AG, MacDougall KW, McLachlan RS, Burneo JG, Steven DA. Stereoelectroencephalography Versus Subdural Strip Electrode Implantations: Feasibility, Complications, and Outcomes in 500 Intracranial Monitoring Cases for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. Neurosurgery 2020; 87:E23-E30. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Both stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural strip electrodes (SSE) are used for intracranial electroencephalographic recordings in the invasive investigation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.
OBJECTIVE
To compare SEEG and SSE with respect to feasibility, complications, and outcome in this single-center study.
METHODS
Patient characteristics, periprocedural parameters, complications, and outcome were acquired from a pro- and retrospectively managed databank to compare SEEG and SSE cases.
RESULTS
A total of 500 intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring cases in 450 patients were analyzed (145 SEEG and 355 SSE). Both groups were of similar age, gender distribution, and duration of epilepsy. Implantation of each SEEG electrode took 13.9 ± 7.6 min (20 ± 12 min for each SSE; P < .01). Radiation exposure to the patient was 4.3 ± 7.7 s to a dose area product of 14.6 ± 27.9 rad*cm2 for SEEG and 9.4 ± 8.9 s with 21 ± 22.4 rad*cm2 for SSE (P < .01). There was no difference in the length of stay (12.2 ± 7.2 and 12 ± 6.3 d). The complication rate was low in both groups. No infections were seen in SEEG cases (2.3% after SSE). The rate of hemorrhage was 2.8% for SEEG and 1.4% for SSE. Surgical outcome was similar.
CONCLUSION
SEEG allows targeting deeply situated foci with a non-inferior safety profile to SSE and seizure outcome comparable to SSE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holger Joswig
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
- HMU Health and Medical University Potsdam, Department of Neurosurgery, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Jonathan C Lau
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Mahmoud Abdallat
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Andrew G Parrent
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Keith W MacDougall
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Richard S McLachlan
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Jorge G Burneo
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | - David A Steven
- Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|