Treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma with a combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil: a multicenter phase II trial

Randomized phase II study of cisplatin and 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) versus cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC)

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a multicentric randomized phase II trial comparing 5-FU continuous infusion (PF) and cisplatin, UFT and vinorelbine (UFTVP) as induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (LA-SCHNC). Primary objective was complete response (CR) to IC and overall survival (OS) was a secondary objective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PF: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. Day 1 (D1) and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) per day i.v. continous infusion D1-D5, every 21 days. UFTVP: cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) i.v. D1; UFT 200 mg/m(2) per day p.o. D1-D21 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) i.v. D1 and D8, every 21 days. Four IC courses were planned in both arms.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients (pts) were included (PF/UFTVP: 99/107): oral cavity: 8%/10%, oropharynx: 20%/25%, hypopharynx: 17%/14%, larynx: 54%/50%. Stage (TNM, 2002): III: 41%/35%, IVA: 23%/27%, IVB: 35%/38%. Complete response to IC: PF:36%/UFTVP:31% (P: no significative (NS)). G 3-4 toxicity (PF/UFTVP): neutropenia: 52%/72%; febrile neutropenia: 3%/20% (P < 0.001); anaemia:1%/14% (P < 0.001); trombocytopenia: 5%/0% (P = 0.02); mucositis: 15%/7% (P < 0.001). Deaths during IC: 2(2%)/3(3%). IC with UFTVP was associated with a favourable OS in the Cox analysis (actuarial 5 year OS: 49% vs. 34%; HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47-0.95, P: 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical response is equal in both arms, overall survival (Cox) is better in the UFTVP arm. Febrile neutropenia and anaemia were more frequent with UFTVP while mucositis and trombocytopenia were more severe with PF.

Cetuximab in squamous cell head and neck carcinomas

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonist, cetuximab, has recently been shown to enhance the effects of radiotherapy, and reports to date indicate that this effect occurs without any change in the pattern and severity of toxicity usually associated with head and neck radiation and/or chemotherapy (CT) administration. Moreover, several studies have reported that the expression of EGFR is strongly linked to poor outcome in patients undergoing therapy. Therefore, the presence of the EGFR in almost all cases of head and neck carcinoma offers a new therapeutic opportunity to most patients. In this paper, we report a review of the major studies dealing with the use of cetuximab in advanced head and neck cancer.

Chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are difficult problems and likely to become more challenging as concurrent chemotherapy and radiation are more widely used. Randomized studies reported in 1992 established the combination of cisplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as the reference regimen for chemotherapy-naive, good-performance status patients. Subsequently, a randomized study of 194 patients comparing cisplatin and 5-FU to cisplatin and paclitaxel found better tolerance, better pain relief, and improved quality of life with the newer regimen, but no survival differences (medians of 9 months) were detected. Phase II studies of a platinum/taxane combination with a third drug have reported response rates of greater than 50%, including 15% complete responses. A number of non-platinum-containing regimens are active in pretreated patients. Gefitinib has shown median survival times comparable to those achieved with cisplatin and paclitaxel, and appears especially promising for patients who recur after cytotoxic chemotherapy. Newer antifolates, agents that target or restore deficient p53, and other signal transduction inhibitors are under study.

Long-Term Results of a Phase II Trial of Induction Chemotherapy with Uracil-Ftegafur (UFT), Vinorelbine, and Cisplatin (UFTVP) followed by Radiotherapy Concomitant with UFT and Carboplatin (RT/UFTJ) in a Primary Site Preservation Setting for Resectable Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Larynx and Hypopharynx

OBJECTIVE

We present long-term results of a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy (IC) with uracilftegafur (UFT) 200 mg/m orally days 1 to 21, vinorelbine 25 mg/m intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 100 mg/m IV day 1 (UFTVP) each for 21 days for 4 courses, followed by radiotherapy concomitant with UFT 100 mg/m orally daily and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.5 IV weekly) (RT/ UFTJ), without surgery to the primary site if response, in patients (pts) with resectable locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. The primary endpoint was clinical complete response (CR) to induction UFTVP, and secondary endpoints were long-term overall survival (OS) and survival with primary site preservation (SPP).

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 1997, 37 pts were included. CR to IC was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43-65%). Main toxicity of UFTVP was G 3,4 neutropenia (73% of pts, 16% developed febrile neutropenia). After IC, primary site was treated with RT in 29 pts: 20 of them received RT/UFTJ (main toxicity mucositis G 3,4 70%). No pt died during treatment. Actuarial 5-year OS and SPP were 57% and 37%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach has significant activity and acceptable toxicity for achieving promising long-term OS and SPP and deserves further investigation.

Activity of vinorelbine in gastrointestinal cancers

Vinorelbine (VNR) is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid (5'nor-anhydro-vinblastine) that differs from other vinca alkaloids by a modification of the catharantine moiety of the molecule. VNR binds to tubulin and inhibits tubulin assembly and microtubule formation. It has less activity than other vinca alkaloids against axonal microtubules and this may account for its reduced neurotoxicity in clinical use. In gastrointestinal tumours, VNR did not show significant activity in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Two phase II studies in metastatic colorectal cancer resulted in conflicting results: no activity in first-line therapy on lung metastases, but encouraging results in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-resistant metastases. Conversely, significant antitumoural effect in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma has been demonstrated. The first study was performed in 46 patients with metastatic disease. Six of 30 patients (20%) without prior chemotherapy achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval (CI), 8-39%). One of 16 (6%) with prior chemotherapy responded. Grade (gr) 3 or 4 granulocytopaenia occurred in 59% of patients and peripheral neurotoxicity was minor (26% gr 1). These results were confirmed by another group. A phase I study was performed using VNR and concurrent radiation (64 Gy) in previously untreated patients with inoperable locally advanced oesophageal cancer ineligible for cisplatin-5-FU-based chemoradiation. Twenty-four patients entered the study. The maximal tolerated dose has been reached at 25 mg/m(2)/week, the dose-limiting toxicities being febrile neutropaenia and infection. Major objective tumour response was observed at each dose level except the first one. Recruitment is ongoing to confirm the recommended dose of VNR (20 mg/m(2)/week). A phase II study of a VNR-cisplatin combination in metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma was recently completed. Seventy-one eligible patients were included. Main toxicities were haematological (gr 3-4 granulocytopaenia, 41%), infection, vomiting and fatigue. The response rate was 37% (95% CI, 26-49%) with a median duration of response of 7.7 months. This 2-day regimen appears at least as active and less toxic than the standard 5-day 5-FU and cisplatin regimen.

Vinorelbine and cisplatin in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: response, toxicity, quality of life and survival

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine and cisplatin are active against squamous cell oesophageal carcinoma. The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine plus cisplatin in previously untreated patients with metastatic squamous cell oesophageal carcinoma and to estimate the progression-free survival, overall survival and quality of life (QoL) of the patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-one eligible patients were entered into a study of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks. Degree of dysphagia relief was monitored and QoL was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30.

RESULTS

All eligible patients were assessed for response and 24 achieved a confirmed partial response (33.8%; 95% confidence interval 23-46); the median duration of response was 6.8 months, progression-free survival was 3.6 months and median survival of the whole group was 6.8 months. Toxicity was mainly related to neutropenia (grade 3/4 in 41% of patients). At cycle 2, 43% of the patients reported at least a moderate improvement in global health status/QoL and 25% experienced a large improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin represents a well-tolerated active palliative regimen for patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. This combination may offer a better therapeutic index than cisplatin-5-fluorouracil.

Developments in cytotoxic chemotherapy: advances in treatment utilising vinorelbine

Vinorelbine is a third generation vinca alkaloid which has been in clinical development for 15 years. Recent exploration of its pre-clinical activity has revealed unexpected evidence of potential synergy with taxane compounds and early clinical results support the suggestion of enhanced efficacy particularly in breast cancer. The initial studies establishing the clinical activity of vinorelbine in breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer have been extended to encompass a thorough evaluation of its contribution to combination chemotherapy for these disorders. In the treatment of breast cancer useful activity has been established for vinorelbine in combination with anthracyclines, anthracenediones, antimetabolites and the taxanes; additive toxicity is not a limiting factor. The activity of vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is significantly extended by incorporation into schedules utilising cisplatin and other agents. Vinorelbine has also demonstrated useful activity in the treatment of a wide range of other malignancies including prostatic carcinoma, multiple myeloma, cancer of the ovary, cervix and head and neck and malignant lymphomas.

Cisplatin and vinorelbine in advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a new highly active chemotherapeutic regimen

PURPOSE

To date the systemic treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (EAC), using both chemotherapy and hormonotherapy (HT), is far from satisfactory. The significant activity of vinorelbine (VNR), a relatively new semisynthetic vinca alkaloid, demonstrated in advanced breast cancer, bronchial adenocarcinoma, and in head and neck cancer, prompted us to carry out a phase II trial employing the combination of cisplatin and VNR in a pluri-institutional series of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic EAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients affected by recurrent and/or metastatic EAC have been treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on day 1 plus VNR 25 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on days 1 + 8. This cycle was repeated every 21 days. After three cycles patients were restaged for objective response. Analysis of response rate and duration, overall survival, and toxicity pattern were the main aims of the study.

RESULTS

Twenty out of thirty-five patients achieved a major objective response for an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence limits (CL): 39%-74%). Four patients had a complete response (11%; 95% CL: 3%-27%) with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of eight hundred fourteen days, while sixteen patients had a partial response (46%; 95% CL: 29%-63%) with a median PFS of one hundred eighty-four days. Six patients had stable disease and nine progressed. All patients who achieved a clinical complete response had only a single site of disease at entry, but no association was noted between number of involved sites and likehood of achieving PR. Median overall survival was 240 days, while that of patients with complete and partial response was 855 and 300 days, respectively. Treatment was quite well tolerated with few cases of grade 3-4 myelosuppression. Alopecia was virtually absent and neurotoxicity was mild. One patient complained of an acute pain syndrome at the tumor site.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDDP + VNR regimen is quite active against recurrent and/or metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma, at least in terms of objective response rate which is among the highest ever reported in medical literature. However. duration of objective response and median overall survival are in the disappointing range reported for other regimens. In our opinion the CDDP plus VNR regimen is good enough to be compared to the anthracycline-based regimens and may represent the basis for future development of newer active polychemotherapeutic schedules.

Vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil as initial treatment for previously untreated, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a phase II multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The combination of vinorelbine (VNR), cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has previously been shown to be active in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCHNC). This multicenter Phase II study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of this combination in patients with previously untreated, unresectable locally advanced SCHNC.

METHODS

Sixty patients with previously untreated, unresectable SCHNC were treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on Days 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on Days 2-5, and VNR 25 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on Days 2 and 8. There were 15 patients with laryngeal carcinoma, 19 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma, 15 with carcinoma in the oral cavity, 5 with carcinoma in the hypopharynx, and 4 with carcinoma in the maxillary sinus. Most patients (78%) had Stage IV disease. After achievement of the best possible objective response, patients were subjected to definitive locoregional treatment, i.e., radiotherapy and/or surgery, as appropriate.

RESULTS

All patients completed the induction chemotherapy. After a mean of 3.86 cycles per patient, the overall response rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-94%), with a complete response rate of 23% (95% CI, 14-26%). Complete responses were more frequently seen in patients with N0-1 disease than in those with N2-3 disease (P = 0.037). No other statistically significant correlation between type of response and extent of disease was noted. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal side effects. After definitive locoregional treatment, 58% of patients were clinically free of disease. These patients included those who had complete response after induction chemotherapy, 19 of 39 patients who had partial response, and 2 with stable disease. Median disease free survival was 16 months, and median overall survival was 23 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU, and VNR was very active in previously untreated SCHNC. It was well tolerated in most cases, and neurotoxicity was not a major side effect. This regimen, which does not require hospitalization, should be compared with standard chemotherapy, such as the combination of CDDP and continuous-infusion 5-FU.