1
|
Nijhuis H, Kallewaard JW, van de Minkelis J, Hofsté WJ, Elzinga L, Armstrong P, Gültuna I, Almac E, Baranidharan G, Nikolic S, Gulve A, Vesper J, Dietz BE, Mugan D, Huygen FJPM. Durability of Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP)-Controlled, Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in a Real-World European Chronic Pain Population. Pain Ther 2024; 13:1119-1136. [PMID: 38954217 PMCID: PMC11393244 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00628-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Closed-loop spinal cord stimulation (CL-SCS) is a recently introduced system that records evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) from the spinal cord elicited by each stimulation pulse and uses this information to automatically adjust the stimulation strength in real time, known as ECAP-controlled SCS. This innovative system compensates for fluctuations in the distance between the epidural leads and the spinal cord by maintaining the neural response (ECAP) at a predetermined target level. This data collection study was designed to assess the performance of the first CL-SCS system in a real-world setting under normal conditions of use in multiple European centers. The study analyzes and presents clinical outcomes and electrophysiological and device data and compares these findings with those reported in earlier pre-market studies of the same system. METHODS This prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted in 13 European centers and aimed to gather electrophysiological and device data. The study focused on the real-world application of this system in treating chronic pain affecting the trunk and/or limbs, adhering to standard conditions of use. In addition to collecting and analyzing basic demographic information, the study presents data from the inaugural patient cohort permanently implanted at multiple European centers. RESULTS A significant decrease in pain intensity was observed for overall back or leg pain scores (verbal numerical rating score [VNRS]) between baseline (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]; n = 135; 8.2 ± 0.1), 3 months (n = 93; 2.3 ± 0.2), 6 months (n = 82; 2.5 ± 0.3), and 12 months (n = 76; 2.5 ± 0.3). Comparison of overall pain relief (%) to the AVALON and EVOKE studies showed no significant differences at 3 and 12 months between the real-world data release (RWE; 71.3%; 69.6%) and the AVALON (71.2%; 73.6%) and EVOKE (78.1%; 76.7%) studies. Further investigation was undertaken to objectively characterize the physiological parameters of SCS therapy in this cohort using the metrics of percent time above ECAP threshold (%), dose ratio, and dose accuracy (µV), according to previously described methods. Results showed that a median of 90% (40.7-99.2) of stimuli were above the ECAP threshold, with a dose ratio of 1.3 (1.1-1.4) and dose accuracy of 4.4 µV (0.0-7.1), based on data from 236, 230, and 254 patients, respectively. Thus, across all three metrics, the majority of patients had objective therapy metrics corresponding to the highest levels of pain relief in previously reported studies (usage over threshold > 80%, dose ratio > 1.2, and error < 10 µV). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the real-world application of the ECAP-controlled CL-SCS system, highlighting its potential for maintaining effective pain relief and objective neurophysiological therapy metrics at levels seen in randomized control trials, and potential for quantifying patient burden associated with SCS system use via patient-device interaction metrics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION In the Netherlands, the study is duly registered on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (Trial NL7889). In Germany, the study is duly registered as NCT05272137 and in the United Kingdom as ISCRTN27710516 and has been reviewed by the ethics committee in both countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold Nijhuis
- St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, Netherlands.
| | - Jan-Willem Kallewaard
- Rijnstate Hospital, Velp, Netherlands
- Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Willem-Jan Hofsté
- St. Antonius Hospital, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Emre Almac
- Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ashish Gulve
- James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Jan Vesper
- Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Dave Mugan
- Saluda Medical Europe Ltd, Harrogate, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ushio K, Nakanishi K, Yoshino A, Takamura M, Akiyama Y, Shimada N, Hirata K, Ishikawa M, Nakamae A, Mikami Y, Okamoto Y, Adachi N. Changed resting-state connectivity of anterior insular cortex affects subjective pain reduction after knee arthroplasty: A longitudinal study. Brain Res Bull 2024; 217:111073. [PMID: 39284503 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2024.111073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
The mechanism of chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain and postoperative pain due to knee arthroplasty has not been elucidated. This could be involved neuroplasticity in brain connectivity. To clarify the mechanism of chronic knee OA pain and postoperative pain, we examined the relationship between resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) and clinical measurements in knee OA before and after knee arthroplasty, focusing on rs-FCs with the anterior insular cortex (aIC) as the key region. Fifteen patients with knee OA underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and clinical measurements shortly before and 6 months after knee arthroplasty, and 15 age- and sex-matched control patients underwent an identical protocol. Seed-to-voxel analysis was performed to compare the clinical measurements and changed rs-FCs, using the aIC as a seed region, between the preoperative and postoperative patients, as well as between the operative and control patients. In preoperative patients, rs-FCs of the aIC to the OFC, frontal pole, subcallosal area, and medial frontal cortex increased compared with those of the control patients. The strength of rs-FC between the left aIC and right OFC decreased before and after knee arthroplasty. The decrease in rs-FC between the left aIC and right OFC was associated with decreased subjective pain score. Our study showed a correlation between longitudinally changed rs-FC and clinical measurement before and after knee arthroplasty. Rs-FC between the aIC and OFC have the potential to elucidate the mechanisms of knee OA pain and postoperative pain due to knee arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Ushio
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Sports Medical Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kazuyoshi Nakanishi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Nihon University, 30-1, Ooyaguchikami-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.
| | - Atsuo Yoshino
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences Research Center, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Masahiro Takamura
- Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences Research Center, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Department of Neurology, Shimane University, 89-1, Enya-cho, Izumo-shi, Shimane 693-8501, Japan
| | - Yuji Akiyama
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Noboru Shimada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Hirata
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Sports Medical Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Masakazu Ishikawa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kagawa University, 1750-1, Ikenobe, Miki-cho, Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
| | - Atsuo Nakamae
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yukio Mikami
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Sports Medical Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Okamoto
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Brain, Mind and KANSEI Sciences Research Center, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| | - Nobuo Adachi
- Sports Medical Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima-shi, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yue JJ, Gilligan CJ, Falowski S, Jameson J, Desai MJ, Moeschler S, Pilitsis J, Heros R, Tavel E, Wahezi S, Funk R, Buchanan P, Christopher A, Weisbein J, Patterson D, Levy R, Antony A, Miller N, Scarfo K, Kreiner S, Wilson D, Lim C, Braun E, Dickerson D, Duncan J, Xu J, Candido K, Mohab I, Michael F, Blomme B, Okaro U, Deer T. Surgical treatment of refractory low back pain using implanted BurstDR spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in a cohort of patients without options for corrective surgery: Findings and results from the DISTINCT study, a prospective randomized multi-center-controlled trial. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2024; 19:100508. [PMID: 39139617 PMCID: PMC11321325 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent, disabling condition affecting millions of people. Patients with an identifiable anatomic pain generator and resulting neuropathic lower extremity symptoms often undergo spine surgery, but many patients lack identifiable and/or surgically corrective pathology. Nonoperative treatment options often fail to provide sustained relief. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is sometimes used to treat these patients, but the lack of level 1 evidence limits its widespread use and insurance coverage. The DISTINCT RCT study evaluates the efficacy of passive recharge burst SCS compared to conventional medical treatment (CMM) in alleviating chronic, refractory axial low back pain. Methods This prospective, multicenter, randomized, study with an optional 6-month crossover involved patients who were not candidates for lumbar spine surgery. The primary and secondary endpoints evaluated improvements in low back pain intensity (NRS), back pain-related disability (ODI), pain catastrophizing (PCS), and healthcare utilization. Patients were randomized to SCS therapy or CMM at 30 US study sites. Results The SCS arm reported an 85.3% NRS responder rate (≥ 50% reduction) compared to 6.2% (5/81) in the CMM arm. After the 6M primary endpoint, SCS patients elected to remain on assigned therapy and 66.2% (49/74) of CMM patients chose to trial SCS (crossover). At the 12M follow-up, SCS and crossover patients reported 78.6% and 71.4% NRS responder rates. Secondary outcomes indicated significant improvements in ODI, PCS, and reduced healthcare utilization. Six serious adverse events were reported and resolved without sequelae. Conclusion DISTINCT chronic low back pain patients with no indication for corrective surgery experienced a significant and sustained response to burst SCS therapy for up to 12 months. CMM patients who crossed over to the SCS arm reported profound improvements after 6 months. This data advocates for a timely consideration of SCS therapy in patients unresponsive to conservative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J. Yue
- Connecticut Orthopaedics, Hamden, CT, United States
| | | | - Steven Falowski
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Lancaster, PA, United States
| | | | - Mehul J. Desai
- International Spine, Pain and Performance Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | | | - Julie Pilitsis
- Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States
| | | | - Edward Tavel
- Clinical Trials of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Sayed Wahezi
- Montefiore Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Robert Funk
- Indiana Spine Group, Indianapolis, IN United States
| | - Patrick Buchanan
- Spanish Hills Interventional Pain Specialists, Camarillo, CA United States
| | | | | | | | - Robert Levy
- Anesthesia Pain Care Consultants, Tamarac, FL United States
| | - Ajay Antony
- The Orthopaedic Institute, Gainesville, FL United States
| | - Nathan Miller
- Coastal Pain & Spinal Diagnostics Medical Group, Carlsbad, CA United States
| | - Keith Scarfo
- Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI United States
| | - Scott Kreiner
- Barrow Brain and Spine—Ahwatukee, Phoenix, AZ United States
| | - Derron Wilson
- Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine, Greenwood, IN United States
| | - Chi Lim
- Carolina Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Associates, Spartanburg, SC United States
| | - Edward Braun
- Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS United States
| | | | - Jonathan Duncan
- Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, San Antonio, TX United States
| | - Jijun Xu
- The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH United States
| | - Kenneth Candido
- Chicago Anesthesia Associates, SC, Chicago, IL United States
| | - Ibrahim Mohab
- Banner University Medical Center, Tucson, AZ United States
| | | | | | | | - Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Eldabe S, Nevitt S, Bentley A, Mekhail NA, Gilligan C, Billet B, Staats PS, Maden M, Soliday N, Leitner A, Duarte RV. Network Meta-analysis and Economic Evaluation of Neurostimulation Interventions for Chronic Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain. Clin J Pain 2024; 40:507-517. [PMID: 38751011 PMCID: PMC11309338 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Different types of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have been evaluated for the management of chronic nonsurgical refractory back pain (NSRBP). A direct comparison between the different types of SCS or between closed-loop SCS with conventional medical management (CMM) for patients with NSRBP has not been previously conducted, and therefore, their relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness remain unknown. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review, network meta-analysis (NMA) and economic evaluation of closed-loop SCS compared with fixed-output SCS and CMM for patients with NSRBP. METHODS Databases were searched to September 8, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of SCS for NSRBP were included. The results of the studies were combined using fixed-effect NMA models. A cost-utility analysis was performed from the perspective of the UK National Health Service with results reported as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS Closed-loop SCS resulted in statistically and clinically significant reductions in pain intensity (mean difference [MD] 32.72 [95% CrI 15.69-49.78]) and improvements in secondary outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] and health-related quality of life [HRQoL]) compared with fixed-output SCS at 6-month follow-up. Compared with CMM, both closed-loop and fixed-output SCS resulted in statistically and clinically significant reductions in pain intensity (closed-loop SCS vs. CMM MD 101.58 [95% CrI 83.73-119.48]; fixed-output SCS versus CMM MD 68.86 [95% CrI 63.43-74.31]) and improvements in secondary outcomes (ODI and HRQoL). Cost-utility analysis showed that closed-loop SCS dominates fixed-output SCS and CMM, and fixed-output SCS also dominates CMM. DISCUSSION Current evidence showed that closed-loop and fixed-output SCS provide more benefits and cost-savings compared with CMM for patients with NSRBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough
| | - Sarah Nevitt
- Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York
| | | | - Nagy A. Mekhail
- Evidence-Based Pain Management Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | - Michelle Maden
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Nicole Soliday
- Saluda Medical Pty Ltd., Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Leitner
- Saluda Medical Pty Ltd., Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rui V. Duarte
- Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Saluda Medical Pty Ltd., Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
White T, Justiz R, Almonte W, Micovic V, Shah B, Anderson E, Kapural L, Cordner H, El-Naggar A, Fishman M, Eshraghi Y, Kim P, Abd-Elsayed A, Chakravarthy K, Millet Y, Sanapati M, Harrison N, Goff B, Gupta M, Grewal P, Wilkinson M, Bundschu R, Will A, Satija P, Li S, Dulebohn S, Broadnax J, Gekht G, Wu K, Falowski S, Park W, Cedeno DL, Vallejo R. Twelve-month results from a randomized controlled trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and conventional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic refractory axial low back pain not eligible for spine surgery. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2024; 19:100528. [PMID: 39229594 PMCID: PMC11369449 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Successful treatments for intractable chronic low back pain (CLBP) in patients who are not eligible for surgical interventions are scarce. The superior efficacy of differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation (DTM SCS) to conventional SCS (Conv-SCS) on the treatment of CLBP in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) who have failed surgical interventions (PSPS-T2) motivated the evaluation of DTM SCS versus Conv-SCS on PSPS patients who are non-surgical candidates (PSPS-T1). Methods This is a prospective, open label, crossover, post-market randomized controlled trial in 20 centers across the United States. Eligible patients were randomized to either DTM SCS or Conv-SCS in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was CLBP responder rate (percentage of subjects with ≥50% CLBP relief) at 3-month in randomized subjects who completed trialing (modified intention-to-treat population). Patients were followed up to 12 months. Secondary endpoints included change of CLBP and leg pain, responder rates, changes in disability, quality of life, patient satisfaction and global impression of change, and safety profile. An optional crossover was available at 6-month to all patients. Results About 121 PSPS-T1 subjects with CLBP and leg pain mostly associated with degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy and who were not eligible for spine surgery were randomized. CLBP responder rate with DTM SCS (93.5%) was superior to Conv-SCS (36.4%) at the primary endpoint. Superior CLBP responder rates (88.1%-90.5%) were obtained with DTM SCS at all other timepoints. Mean CLBP reduction with DTM SCS (6.52 cm) was superior to that with Conv-SCS (3.01 cm) at the primary endpoint. Similar CLBP reductions (6.23-6.43 cm) were obtained with DTM SCS at other timepoints. DTM SCS provided significantly better leg pain reduction and responder rate, improvement of disability and quality of life, and better patient satisfaction and global impression of change. 90.9% of Conv-SCS subjects who crossed over were CLBP responders at completion of the study. Similar safety profiles were observed between the two groups. Conclusion DTM SCS for chronic CLBP in nonsurgical candidates is superior to Conv-SCS. Improvements were sustained and provided significant benefits on the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas White
- Procura Pain and Spine, Pain Management. 111 Vision Park Blvd #100, Shenandoah, TX 77384
| | - Rafael Justiz
- Oklahoma Pain Physicians, Pain Management, 4117 NW 122nd St #C, Oklahoma City, OK 73120
| | - Wilson Almonte
- Victoria Pain and Rehabilitation, Pain Management, 6902 Zac Lentz Parkway, Victoria, TX 77904
| | - Velimir Micovic
- Pain Management Consultants, Pain Management, 7964 Summerlin Lakes Dr, Fort Myers, FL 33907
| | - Binit Shah
- Carolinas Pain Center, Pain Management, 9735 Kincey Ave STE 100, Huntersville, NC 28078
| | - Eric Anderson
- Advanced Pain Institute of Texas, Pain Management, 500 W Main St Suite 230, Lewisville, TX 75057
| | - Leonardo Kapural
- Carolinas Pain Institute, Pain Management, 145 Kimel Park Dr #330, Winston-Salem, NC 27103
| | - Harold Cordner
- Florida Pain Management Associates, Pain Management, 13825 U.S. Hwy 1, Sebastian, FL 32958
| | - Amr El-Naggar
- DREZ One, Pain Management, 75 Hail Knob Rd, Somerset, KY 42503
| | - Michael Fishman
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Pain Management, 160 N Pointe Blvd Suite 208, Lancaster, PA 17604
| | - Yashar Eshraghi
- Ochsner Medical Center, Pain Management, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121
| | - Philip Kim
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Pain Management, 160 N Pointe Blvd Suite 208, Lancaster, PA 17604
| | - Al Abd-Elsayed
- University of Wisconsin, Pain Management, 102 S Park St 3rd floor, Madison, WI 53715
| | - Krishnan Chakravarthy
- Coastal Research Institute, Pain Management, 6221 Metropolitan Street, Ste. 201, Carlsbad, CA 92009
- VA San Diego Healthcare, Pain Management, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92161
| | - Yoann Millet
- Procura Pain and Spine, Pain Management. 111 Vision Park Blvd #100, Shenandoah, TX 77384
| | - Mahendra Sanapati
- Global Scientific Innovations, Pain Management, 1101 Professional Blvd, Ste 208, Evansville, IN 47714
| | - Nathan Harrison
- Ochsner Medical Center, Pain Management, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121
| | - Brandon Goff
- Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, Pain Management, 400 Concord Plaza Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78216
| | - Mayank Gupta
- Neuroscience Research Center, Pain Management. 10995 Quivira Road, Overland Park, KS 66210
| | - Prabhdeep Grewal
- Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, Pain Management, 400 Concord Plaza Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78216
| | - Michael Wilkinson
- Pain Medicine Associates Surgery Center, Pain Management, 101 Med Tech Pkwy #200, Johnson City, TN 37604
| | - Richard Bundschu
- Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pain Management, Pain Management, 6202 17th Ave W, Bradenton, FL 34209
| | - Andrew Will
- Twin Cities Pain Clinic; Pain Management, 7235 Ohms Lane, Edina, MN
| | - Pankaj Satija
- Pain & Headache Centers of Texas, Pain Management, 313 La Concha Lane, Suite 120, Houston, TX 77054
| | - Sean Li
- National Spine and Pain Premier Pain Centers, Pain Management, 170 Ave at the Cmns Suite 6, Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
| | - Scott Dulebohn
- Pain Medicine Associates Surgery Center, Pain Management, 101 Med Tech Pkwy #200, Johnson City, TN 37604
| | - John Broadnax
- Advanced Pain Institute of Texas, Pain Management, 500 W Main St Suite 230, Lewisville, TX 75057
| | - Gennady Gekht
- Coastal Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Pain Management, Pain Management, 6202 17th Ave W, Bradenton, FL 34209
| | - Ken Wu
- Procura Pain and Spine, Pain Management. 111 Vision Park Blvd #100, Shenandoah, TX 77384
| | - Steven Falowski
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine, Pain Management, 160 N Pointe Blvd Suite 208, Lancaster, PA 17604
| | - Wesley Park
- SGX Medical LLC, Clinical Research, 33 Derby Way, Bloomington, IL 61704
| | - David L. Cedeno
- SGX Medical LLC, Clinical Research, 33 Derby Way, Bloomington, IL 61704
| | - Ricardo Vallejo
- SGX Medical LLC, Clinical Research, 33 Derby Way, Bloomington, IL 61704
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Provenzano DA, Leech JE, Bendersky M, Azalde R. Defining Short- and Long-Term Programming Requirements in Patients Treated With 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:1045-1054. [PMID: 38829295 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10-kHz SCS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for refractory low back pain and neck pain with and without limb pain in clinical trial and real-world studies. However, limited information is available in the literature on the type and frequency of programming parameters required to optimize pain relief. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective trial and postimplant clinical and system device data were analyzed from consecutive patients with neck pain and low back pain, with and without limb pain, from a single clinical site, including both thoracic and cervical lead placement. Best bipole, stimulation parameters, and outcomes, including pain relief, change in opioid medication use, sleep, and daily function, were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 92 patients in the trial, 70 received a permanent implant. Of these, the mean duration of follow-up was 1.8 ± 1.3 years. Pain relief of ≥50% at the last follow-up was achieved by 64% of patients implanted; in addition, 65% reduced their opioid medication use; 65% reported improved sleep, and 71% reported improved function. There was some consistency between the "best" bipole at trial and permanent implant, with 82% of patients within one bipole location, including 54% of permanent implants who were using the same best bipole as at trial. After permanent implant, device reprogramming was minimal, with ≤one reprogramming change per patient per quarter required to maintain pain outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In the study, 10-kHz SCS was an effective therapy for treating chronic pain, whereby a high responder rate (≥50% pain relief) was achieved with short time to pain relief in trial and maintained with limited device programming after permanent implant. The data presented here provide insight into the programming required during the trial and implant stages to obtain and maintain therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jozef E Leech
- Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fabregat-Cid G, Cedeno DL, De Andrés J, Harutyunyan A, Monsalve-Dolz V, Mínguez-Martí A, Escrivá-Matoses N, Asensio-Samper JM, Carnaval T, Villoria J, Rodríguez-López R, Vallejo R. Insights into the pathophysiology and response of persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 to spinal cord stimulation: a human genome-wide association study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024:rapm-2024-105517. [PMID: 38960591 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides pain relief for some patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS 2), but the precise mechanisms of action and prognostic factors for a favorable pain response remain obscure. This in vivo human genome-wide association study provides some pathophysiological clues. METHODS We performed a high-density oligonucleotide microarray analysis of serum obtained from both PSPS 2 cases and pain-free controls who had undergone lower back spinal surgery at the study site. Using multivariate discriminant analysis, we tried to identify different expressions between mRNA transcripts from PSPS 2 patients relative to controls, SCS responders to non-responders, or SCS responders to themselves before starting SCS. Gene ontology enrichment analysis was used to identify the biological processes that best discriminate between the groups of clinical interest. RESULTS Thirty PSPS 2 patients, of whom 23 responded to SCS, were evaluated together with 15 pain-free controls. We identified 11 significantly downregulated genes in serum of PSPS 2 patients compared with pain-free controls and two significantly downregulated genes once the SCS response became apparent. All were suggestive of enhanced inflammation, tissue repair mechanisms and proliferative responses among the former. We could not identify any gene differentiating patients who responded to SCS from those who did not respond. CONCLUSIONS This study points out various biological processes that may underlie PSPS 2 pain and SCS therapeutic effects, including the modulation of neuroimmune response, inflammation and restorative processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Fabregat-Cid
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Surgery Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - José De Andrés
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Surgery Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Anushik Harutyunyan
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Vicente Monsalve-Dolz
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Mínguez-Martí
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Juan Marcos Asensio-Samper
- Multidisciplinary Pain Management Department, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Surgery Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Thiago Carnaval
- Neuropharmacology & Pain Group, Neuroscience Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, Barcelona, Spain
- Design and Biometrics Department, Medicxact, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Villoria
- Neuropharmacology & Pain Group, Neuroscience Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, Barcelona, Spain
- Design and Biometrics Department, Medicxact, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Rodríguez-López
- Genetics Laboratory; Clinical Analysis Service, General University Hospital Consortium of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wondwossen Y, Patzkowski MS, Amoako MY, Lawson BK, Velosky AG, Soto AT, Highland KB. Spinal Cord Stimulator Inequities Within the US Military Health System. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:916-922. [PMID: 38971583 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Although studies have described inequities in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) receipt, there is a lack of information to inform system-level changes to support health care equity. This study evaluated whether Black patients exhaust more treatment options than do White patients, before receiving SCS. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included claims data of Black and non-Latinx White patients who were active-duty service members or military retirees who received a persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) diagnosis associated with back surgery within the US Military Health System, January 2017 to January 2020 (N = 8753). A generalized linear model examined predictors of SCS receipt within two years of diagnosis, including the interaction between race and number of pain-treatment types received. RESULTS In the generalized linear model, Black patients (10.3% [8.7%, 12.0%]) were less likely to receive SCS than were White patients (13.6% [12.7%, 14.6%]) The interaction term was significant; White patients who received zero to three different types of treatments were more likely to receive SCS than were Black patients who received zero to three treatments, whereas Black and White patients who received >three treatments had similar likelihoods of receiving a SCS. CONCLUSIONS In a health care system with intended universal access, White patients diagnosed with PSPS tried fewer treatment types before receiving SCS, whereas the number of treatment types tried was not significantly related to SCS receipt in Black patients. Overall, Black patients received SCS less often than did White patients. Findings indicate the need for structured referral pathways, provider evaluation on equity metrics, and top-down support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ysehak Wondwossen
- School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Michael S Patzkowski
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Maxwell Y Amoako
- Enterprise Intelligence and Data Solutions program office, Program Executive Office, Defense Healthcare Management Systems, San Antonio, TX, USA; Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Bryan K Lawson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander G Velosky
- Enterprise Intelligence and Data Solutions program office, Program Executive Office, Defense Healthcare Management Systems, San Antonio, TX, USA; Defense and Veterans Center for Integrative Pain Management, Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Adam T Soto
- Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Krista B Highland
- Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yeo J. Failed back surgery syndrome-terminology, etiology, prevention, evaluation, and management: a narrative review. JOURNAL OF YEUNGNAM MEDICAL SCIENCE 2024; 41:166-178. [PMID: 38853538 PMCID: PMC11294787 DOI: 10.12701/jyms.2024.00339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
Amid the worldwide increase in spinal surgery rates, a significant proportion of patients continue to experience refractory chronic pain, resulting in reduced quality of life and escalated healthcare demands. Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a clinical condition characterized by persistent or recurrent pain after one or more spinal surgeries. The diverse characteristics and stigmatizing descriptions of FBSS necessitate a reevaluation of its nomenclature to reflect its complexity more accurately. Accurate identification of the cause of FBSS is hampered by the complex nature of the syndrome and limitations of current diagnostic labels. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach that may include pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, psychological support, and interventional procedures, emphasizing realistic goal-setting and patient education. Further research is needed to increase our understanding, improve diagnostic accuracy, and develop more effective management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinseok Yeo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kallewaard JW, Billet B, Van Paesschen R, Smet I, Mendiola A, Peña I, López P, Carceller J, Tornero C, Zuidema X, Vesper J, Lehmberg J, Laloo W, Cedeño DL, Vallejo R. European randomized controlled trial evaluating differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and conventional medical management in subjects with persistent back pain ineligible for spine surgery: 24-month results. Eur J Pain 2024. [PMID: 38943239 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation (DTM SCS) was shown to be superior to conventional SCS for treating chronic low back pain (CLBP) in subjects with persistent spinal pain syndrome with previous spinal surgery (PSPS-T2) or ineligible for it (PSPS-T1). This study reports 24-month efficacy and safety of DTM SCS vs. conventional medical management (CMM) in PSPS-T1 subjects across four European countries. METHODS This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial with optional crossover. Subjects randomized 1:1 to DTM SCS or CMM. Primary endpoint was responder rate (% subjects reporting ≥50% CLBP relief) at 6 months. A superiority test compared responder rates between treatments. CLBP and leg pain levels, functional disability, quality of life (QoL), patient satisfaction and global impression of change were evaluated for 24 months. A Composite Responder Index (CRI) was obtained using CLBP relief, disability and QoL. Incidence of study-related adverse events evaluated safety. RESULTS A total of 55 and 57 subjects were randomized to DTM SCS and CMM respectively. DTM SCS was superior, with CLBP responder rates ≥80% and CLBP relief >5.6 cm (>70% reduction) through the 24-month follow-up. Improvements with DTM SCS in other outcomes were sustained. The CRI was >80% for DTM SCS through 24 months. Opioid medication intake decreased in subjects treated with DTM SCS. Most patients treated with DTM SCS felt satisfied and improved at the end of the study. Safety was congruent with other studies. CONCLUSION DTM SCS is efficacious and safe during 24 months for the treatment of CLBP and leg pain in PSPS-T1 patients ineligible for spine surgery. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This randomized controlled trial shows that Differential Target Multiplexed SCS (DTM SCS) is an effective and safe long-term treatment for PSPS type 1 patients suffering from axial low back pain with or without leg pain and who are ineligible for spinal surgery. Currently, CMM treatments are their only option and provide limited benefits. Besides superior pain relief, DTM SCS provides significant improvements in functional disability, quality of life, high levels of satisfaction and perceived impression of change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan W Kallewaard
- Rijnstate, Elst, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Isaac Peña
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Pablo López
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Javier Carceller
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Carlos Tornero
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Xander Zuidema
- Diakonessenhuis, Zeist, The Netherlands
- Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Vesper
- Uniklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Wim Laloo
- SGX Medical LLC, Bloomington, Illinois, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Johnson D, Feng L, Johnson C. Retrospective review of the efficacy for sublingual ketamine in the treatment of chronic low back pain defined by a cause and central functional pain symptom focused clinical model. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:2117-2124. [PMID: 37259521 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2218652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chronic low back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide. A clinical model for its cause is lacking. Defining a cause based clinical model and a framework of understanding back pain in terms of peripheral structural and central functional pain is essential for optimal management. MATERIALS AND METHODS We describe the results of the largest published audit of 41 chronic low back pain patients, receiving outpatient sublingual ketamine therapy for defined central functional pain along with conventional peripheral structural pain management. Our clinical model assigns Movement Dysfunction as the primary cause for low back pain symptoms and restores it with Movement Therapy focused rehabilitation which is also defined. Patients were derived from a tertiary single neurosurgical specialist practice in Brisbane Australia over a three year period. RESULTS Severe pain and disability measurements more than halved and only 13% of patients ceased ketamine prematurely due to predominantly non-sinister side effects common to all pharmaceutical therapies. All other surveyed metrics of utility were highly favourable in this challenging cohort of chronic back pain patients biased to poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient ketamine maintains high efficacy and safety used in conjunction with a unique clinical model that describes chronic low back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Johnson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Back Pain Centre, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brisbane Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lanxuan Feng
- Mayne Medical School, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Charlotte Johnson
- Department of Journalism, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van de Minkelis J, Peene L, Cohen SP, Staats P, Al-Kaisy A, Van Boxem K, Kallewaard JW, Van Zundert J. 6. Persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2. Pain Pract 2024. [PMID: 38616347 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS) refers to chronic axial pain and/or extremity pain. Two subtypes have been defined: PSPS-type 1 is chronic pain without previous spinal surgery and PSPS-type 2 is chronic pain, persisting after spine surgery, and is formerly known as Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) or post-laminectomy syndrome. The etiology of PSPS-type 2 can be gleaned using elements from the patient history, physical examination, and additional medical imaging. Origins of persistent pain following spinal surgery may be categorized into an inappropriate procedure (eg a lumbar fusion at an incorrect level or for sacroiliac joint [SIJ] pain); technical failure (eg operation at non-affected levels, retained disk fragment, pseudoarthrosis), biomechanical sequelae of surgery (eg adjacent segment disease or SIJ pain after a fusion to the sacrum, muscle wasting, spinal instability); and complications (eg battered root syndrome, excessive epidural fibrosis, and arachnoiditis), or undetermined. METHODS The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of PSPS-type 2 was retrieved and summarized. RESULTS There is low-quality evidence for the efficacy of conservative treatments including exercise, rehabilitation, manipulation, and behavioral therapy, and very limited evidence for the pharmacological treatment of PSPS-type 2. Interventional treatments such as pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the dorsal root ganglia, epidural adhesiolysis, and spinal endoscopy (epiduroscopy) might be beneficial in patients with PSPS-type 2. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be an effective treatment for chronic, intractable neuropathic limb pain, and possibly well-selected candidates with axial pain. CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of PSPS-type 2 is based on patient history, clinical examination, and medical imaging. Low-quality evidence exists for conservative interventions. Pulsed radiofrequency, adhesiolysis and SCS have a higher level of evidence with a high safety margin and should be considered as interventional treatment options when conservative treatment fails.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan van de Minkelis
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Laurens Peene
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Anesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Anesthesiology and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter Staats
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, National Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA
| | - Adnan Al-Kaisy
- Pain Management Department, Gassiot House, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Koen Van Boxem
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| | - Jan Willem Kallewaard
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Velp, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pahapill PA, Arocho-Quinones EV, Chen G, Swearingen B, Tomas CW, Koch KM, Nencka AS. Distinct Functional Connectivity Patterns for Intermittent Vs Constant Neuropathic Pain Phenotypes in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 Patients. J Pain Res 2024; 17:1453-1460. [PMID: 38628431 PMCID: PMC11020324 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s426640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic low back pain (cLBP) has been associated with alterations in brain functional connectivity (FC) but based upon heterogeneous populations and single network analyses. Our goal is to study a more homogeneous cLBP population and focus on multiple cross-network (CN) connectivity analysis. We hypothesize that within this population: 1) altered CN FC, involving emotion and reward/aversion functions are related to their pain levels and 2) altered relationships are dependent upon pain phenotype (constant neuropathic vs intermittent pain). Methods In this case series, resting state fcMRI scans were obtained over a study duration of 60 months from 23 patients (13 constant neuropathic and 10 intermittent pain) with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS Type 2) being considered for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy at a single academic center. Images were acquired using a Discovery MR750 GE scanner. During the resting state acquisitions, they were asked to close their eyes and relax. The CN analysis was performed on 7 brain networks and compared to age-matched controls. Linear regression was used to test the correlation between CN connectivity and pain scores. Results CN FC involving emotion networks (STM: striatum network index) was significantly lower than controls in all patients, regardless of pain phenotype (P < 0.003). Pain levels were positively correlated with emotional FC for intermittent pain but negatively correlated for constant pain. Conclusion This is the first report of 1) altered CN FC involving emotion/reward brain circuitry in 2) a homogeneous population of cLBP patients with 3) two different pain phenotypes (constant vs intermittent) in PSPS Type 2 patients being considered for SCS. FC patterns were altered in cLBP patients as compared to controls and were characteristic for each pain phenotype. These data support fcMRI as a potential and objective tool in assessing pain levels in cLBP patients with different pain phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter A Pahapill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Guangyu Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Brad Swearingen
- Center for Neuroimaging, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Carissa W Tomas
- Center for Neuroimaging, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kevin M Koch
- Center for Neuroimaging, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park J, Ahn DK, Choi DJ. Treatment Concept and Technical Considerations of Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Asian Spine J 2024; 18:301-323. [PMID: 38130043 PMCID: PMC11065520 DOI: 10.31616/asj.2023.0409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Decompression is a major component of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In addition to sufficient decompression to guarantee the relief of neurological pain, compensating surgical instability after wider laminectomy and foraminotomy and instrumentation with caging and fusion with grafting are performed to secure or restore the foraminal dimension and correct coronal/sagittal imbalance for longer survival of the adjacent segment. Endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) has been developed under the flag of successful decompression while preserving structural integrity as much as possible with the help of magnification and illumination. ESS provides a technical possibility and feasibility for solving LSS by decompression alone. Recently, many endoscopic trials have been conducted to overcome conventional surgical treatment that requires wider dissection, escape inevitable complications from surgical damage, and compensate for the fusion technique. However, biportal ESS has some technical limitations, including clinical difficulties in accessibility for more moderate to severe stenosis and challenges for complicated conditions with segmental ventral slip, isthmic defect, stenosis combined with foraminal stenosis or foraminal disk rupture, or degenerative segmental scoliosis with disk height collapsing and endplate fatigue fracture. Because decompression alone is a skill for eliminating pathologies, there is no function of preserving degenerative structure or stopping the recurrence of disk degeneration or subsidence. This review of clinical reports investigated the possibility of biportal ESS for treating degenerative lumbar disorders by sufficient decompression and adequate elimination of various pathologies and decreasing technical complications. The results of this study may help develop better innovative spinal surgical techniques in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA,
USA
| | - Dong-Ki Ahn
- Seoul Sacred Heart General Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bastiaens F, Wegener JT, Ostelo RWJG, van Roosendaal BKWP, Vissers KCP, van Hooff ML. Clinical Patient-Relevant Outcome Domains for Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome-A Scoping Review and Expert Panels. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1975. [PMID: 38610739 PMCID: PMC11012536 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Large variation exists in the monitoring of clinical outcome domains in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS). Furthermore, it is unclear which outcome domains are important from the PSPS patient's perspective. The study objectives were to identify patient-relevant outcome domains for PSPS and to establish a PSPS outcomes framework. PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched to identify studies reporting views or preferences of PSPS patients on outcome domains. The Arksey and O'Malley framework was followed to identify outcome domains. An expert panel rated the domains based on the importance for PSPS patients they have treated. A framework of relevant outcome domains was established using the selected outcome domains by the expert panel. No studies were found for PSPS type 1. Five studies with 77 PSPS type 2 patients were included for further analysis. Fourteen outcome domains were identified. An expert panel, including 27 clinical experts, reached consensus on the domains pain, daily activities, perspective of life, social participation, mobility, mood, self-reliance, and sleep. Eleven domains were included in the PSPS type 2 outcomes framework. This framework is illustrative of a more holistic perspective and should be used to improve the evaluation of care for PSPS type 2 patients. Further research is needed on the prioritization of relevant outcome domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Bastiaens
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica T. Wegener
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond W. J. G. Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science and Amsterdam Movement Science Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert-Kristian W. P. van Roosendaal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kris C. P. Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda L. van Hooff
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, 9500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pisansky AJB, MacDougall BJ, Ross EL, Chi JH, Neville G, Yaksh TL. Catheter Tip-Associated Mass With Continuous Infusion of Sufentanil for Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: A Case Report Including Histopathologic Examination and Review of the Associated Basic and Clinical Research. Neuromodulation 2024:S1094-7159(24)00031-X. [PMID: 38441505 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intrathecal opioids delivered by implanted pumps are used to treat malignant or nonmalignant chronic pain. In this study, we 1) review a case in which intrathecal infusions of sufentanil along with other adjuvants were used and after an extended period led to an intrathecal mass and 2) compared and contrasted the potential mechanisms for these phenomena. MATERIALS AND METHODS A woman aged 66 years with a history of scoliosis and multiple spine surgeries was treated with an implantable drug delivery system for treating persistent pain after laminectomy. The patient received intrathecal medication comprising sufentanil, bupivacaine, and clonidine. RESULTS Intrathecal therapy over approximately ten years served to reduce pain and improve function over the treatment period. After the extended treatment interval, the patient developed an intrathecal mass that was associated with impairment. The mass was surgically removed. Systematic histopathology revealed the space-occupying mass to largely comprise fibroblasts and some inflammatory cells embedded in a collagen mass located proximally to the catheter tip. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first published case report of sufentanil causing this complication. The science and mechanism of intrathecal catheter tip-associated mass formation and associated clinical research correlates are reviewed in detail, and explanations for this phenomenon are proposed based on histochemical analysis of the patient's pathology findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J B Pisansky
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Twin Cities Pain Clinic, Edina, MN, USA
| | - Benjamin J MacDougall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Edgar L Ross
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John H Chi
- Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Grace Neville
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tony L Yaksh
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peene L, Cohen SP, Kallewaard JW, Wolff A, Huygen F, Gaag AVD, Monique S, Vissers K, Gilligan C, Van Zundert J, Van Boxem K. 1. Lumbosacral radicular pain. Pain Pract 2024; 24:525-552. [PMID: 37985718 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients suffering lumbosacral radicular pain report radiating pain in one or more lumbar or sacral dermatomes. In the general population, low back pain with leg pain extending below the knee has an annual prevalence that varies from 9.9% to 25%. METHODS The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of lumbosacral radicular pain was reviewed and summarized. RESULTS Although a patient's history, the pain distribution pattern, and clinical examination may yield a presumptive diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain, additional clinical tests may be required. Medical imaging studies can demonstrate or exclude specific underlying pathologies and identify nerve root irritation, while selective diagnostic nerve root blocks can be used to confirm the affected level(s). In subacute lumbosacral radicular pain, transforaminal corticosteroid administration provides short-term pain relief and improves mobility. In chronic lumbosacral radicular pain, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the spinal ganglion (DRG) can provide pain relief for a longer period in well-selected patients. In cases of refractory pain, epidural adhesiolysis and spinal cord stimulation can be considered in experienced centers. CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain is based on a combination of history, clinical examination, and additional investigations. Epidural steroids can be considered for subacute lumbosacral radicular pain. In chronic lumbosacral radicular pain, PRF adjacent to the DRG is recommended. SCS and epidural adhesiolysis can be considered for cases of refractory pain in specialized centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens Peene
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk/Lanaken, Belgium
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Pain Medicine Division, Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jan Willem Kallewaard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Velp, The Netherlands
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andre Wolff
- Department of Anesthesiology UMCG Pain Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Huygen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Erasmusmc, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antal van de Gaag
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Steegers Monique
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kris Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Chris Gilligan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Brigham & Women's Spine Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jan Van Zundert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk/Lanaken, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Van Boxem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk/Lanaken, Belgium
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kaijankoski H, Nissen M, Ikäheimo TM, von und zu Fraunberg M, Airaksinen O, Huttunen J. Neuropathic Pain Medication and Antidepressant Use after Disability Pension in Patients with Spinal Cord Stimulation for Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome. Pain Res Manag 2024; 2024:4953758. [PMID: 38327724 PMCID: PMC10849812 DOI: 10.1155/2024/4953758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
Background Treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) is challenging. Chronic pain associated with PSPS can lead to an impaired ability to work. Objective To obtain information on whether receiving a disability pension (DP) affects pain and pain treatments in retiring working-age PSPS patients. Neuropathic pain medication and antidepressant use were considered as an indicator of neuropathic pain. Methods The study group comprised 129 consecutive PSPS patients with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices implanted at Kuopio University Hospital Neurosurgery between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2014. Purchase data of gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors from January 1995 to March 2016, as well as the data on working ability, were retrieved from national registries. Results The data showed that 28 of 129 (21.7%) SCS permanent patients had a DP, and 27 had a sufficient follow-up time (two years before and one year after DP). Most patients (61%) used neuropathic pain medications during the follow-up, while 44% used antidepressants. Most patients (70%, n = 19) retired because of dorsopathies. The dose of gabapentinoids started to increase before the DP; after the DP, the doses started to increase again after the decrease but remained at a lower level. Conclusions Neuropathic pain medication and antidepressant use suggest that pain continues after the DP-that is, pensioners continue to experience inconvenient chronic pain. Resources for patient care are therefore needed after the DP. However, the DP reduces the dose increase of gabapentinoids; the dose is higher immediately before retirement than at the end of the follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Kaijankoski
- Departments of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, PB 100, KYS 70029, Kuopio, Finland
- University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mette Nissen
- Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital, PB 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tiina-Mari Ikäheimo
- Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital, PB 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Mikael von und zu Fraunberg
- Neurosurgery, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, Oulu 90220, Finland
- University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Olavi Airaksinen
- Departments of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, PB 100, KYS 70029, Kuopio, Finland
- University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jukka Huttunen
- Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital, PB 100, 70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhou S, Nerusu LA, Hussain N, Abd-Elsayed A. Sacral neuromodulation. NEUROMODULATION TECHNIQUES FOR THE SPINE 2024:137-149. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-87584-4.00026-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
20
|
Hamm-Faber TE, Vissers KCP, Kalkman JS, van Haren FGAM, Aukes HJA, Engels Y, Henssen DJHA. The Predicted Outcome of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With a Psychopathological Disorder and Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: A Systematic Review From 2009 to 2021. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:59-69. [PMID: 38127048 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Psychologic screening is often included as a mandatory component of evaluation of the impact of psychopathology disorders on the predicted outcome of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for patients with chronic pain due to persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS type 2). The conclusion of such screenings can influence the decision to offer SCS therapy to a patient. However, evidence on the impact of psychopathology on SCS outcomes is still scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS To address this knowledge gap, we systematically reviewed the literature from 2009 to 2021 to explore the correlation between the presence of a psychopathological disorder and the predicted outcome of SCS in patients with PSPS type 2. The literature search was conducted using various online data bases with "failed back surgery syndrome," "psychopathology," and "spinal cord stimulation" used as essential keywords. The identified studies were organized in a Rayyan AI data base, and the quality was analyzed with the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool. RESULTS Our search generated the identification of 468 original articles, of which two prospective and four retrospective studies met our inclusion criteria. These studies reported pain relief, a reduction of symptoms of anxiety and depression, and an improvement in rumination on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with PSPS type 2 after SCS therapy. The studies also found contradictory outcomes measured using the Oswestry Disability Index, and in terms of the impact of psychopathological disorder on the clinical outcome and revision rate of the SCS system. CONCLUSION In this systematic review, we found no convincing evidence that the presence of a psychopathological disorder affects the predicted outcome of SCS therapy in patients with PSPS type 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja E Hamm-Faber
- Department of Pain Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Kris C P Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joke S Kalkman
- Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank G A M van Haren
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J A Aukes
- Department of Pain Medicine, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Engels
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dylan J H A Henssen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lappalainen E, Huttunen J, Kokki H, Toroi P, Kokki M. Tramadol-paracetamol for postoperative pain after spine surgery - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Pain 2024; 24:sjpain-2023-0105. [PMID: 38708610 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multimodal pain management is one component in enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. Here we evaluate the efficacy of tramadol-paracetamol in acute postoperative pain and pain outcome at 12 months after spine surgery in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS We randomized 120 patients undergoing spine surgery to receive, for add-on pain management, two tramadol-paracetamol 37.5 mg/325 mg (n = 61) or placebo tablets (n = 59) twice a day for 5 postoperative days. In the hospital, multimodal pain management consisted of dexketoprofen and oxycodone. After discharge, patients were prescribed ibuprofen 200 mg, maximum 1,200 mg/day. Pain, analgesic use, and satisfaction with pain medication were followed up with the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire before surgery and at 1 and 52 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was patients' satisfaction with pain medication 1 week after surgery. RESULTS At 1 week after surgery, patients' satisfaction with pain medication was similarly high in the two groups, 75% [interquartile range, 30%] in the placebo group and 70% [40%] in the tramadol-paracetamol group (p = 0.949) on a scale: 0% = not satisfied, 100% = totally satisfied. At 1 week, ibuprofen dose was lower in the placebo group 200 mg [1,000] compared to the tramadol-paracetamol group, 800 mg [1,600] (p = 0.016). There was no difference in the need for rescue oxycodone. Patients in the tramadol-paracetamol group had more adverse events associated with analgesics during the first postoperative week (relative risk = 1.8, 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.6). CONCLUSION Add-on pain treatment with tramadol-paracetamol did not enhance patients' satisfaction with early pain management after back surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Lappalainen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Jukka Huttunen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neuro Centre, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Hannu Kokki
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Petri Toroi
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive care, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, FI-70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Merja Kokki
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive care, Kuopio University Hospital, PO Box 100, FI-70029 KYS, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bastiaens F, van de Wijgert IH, Bronkhorst EM, van Roosendaal BKWP, van Heteren EPZ, Gilligan C, Staats P, Wegener JT, van Hooff ML, Vissers KCP. Factors Predicting Clinically Relevant Pain Relief After Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Chronic Low Back and/or Leg Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Neuromodulation 2024; 27:70-82. [PMID: 38184342 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.10.188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE To optimize results with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic low back pain (CLBP) and/or leg pain, including persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS), careful patient selection based on proved predictive factors is essential. Unfortunately, the necessary selection process required to optimize outcomes of SCS remains challenging. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to evaluate predictive factors of clinically relevant pain relief after SCS for patients with CLBP and/or radicular leg pain, including PSPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS In August 2023, PubMed, Cinahl, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched to identify studies published between January 2010 and August 2023. Studies reporting the percentage of patients with ≥50% pain relief after SCS in patients with CLBP and leg pain, including PSPS at 12 or 24 months, were included. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool results for back, leg, and general pain relief. Predictive factors for pain relief after 12 months were examined using univariable and multivariable meta-regression. RESULTS A total of 27 studies (2220 patients) were included for further analysis. The mean percentages of patients with substantial pain relief were 68% for leg pain, 63% for back pain, and 73% for general pain at 12 months follow-up, and 63% for leg pain, 59% for back pain, and 71% for general pain at 24 months follow-up assessment. The implantation method and baseline Oswestry Disability Index made the multivariable meta-regression model for ≥50% back pain relief. Sex and pain duration made the final model for ≥50% leg pain relief. Variable stimulation and implantation method made the final model for general pain relief. CONCLUSIONS This review supports SCS as an effective pain-relieving treatment for CLBP and/or leg pain, and models were developed to predict substantial back and leg pain relief. To provide high-grade evidence for predictive factors, SCS studies of high quality are needed in which standardized factors predictive of SCS success, based on in-patient improvements, are monitored and reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Bastiaens
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Ilse H van de Wijgert
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ewald M Bronkhorst
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Esther P Z van Heteren
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Staats
- National Spine and Pain, ElectroCore, Inc, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jessica T Wegener
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda L van Hooff
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Orthopedics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kris C P Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Raymaekers V, Meeuws S, Goudman L, der Steen GV, Moens M, Vanloon M, Ridder DD, Menovsky T, Vesper J, Plazier M. Patient profiling and outcome assessment in spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and/or leg pain (the PROSTIM study): a study protocol. Pain Manag 2023; 13:677-687. [PMID: 38054386 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment option in the multidisciplinary approach to chronic back and leg pain. Nevertheless, careful patient selection remains crucial to provide the most optimal treatment and prevent treatment failure. We report the protocol for the PROSTIM study, an ongoing prospective, multicentric and observational clinical study (NCT05349695) that aims to identify different patient clusters and their outcomes after SCS. Patients are recruited in different centers in Europe. Analysis focuses on identifying significant patient clusters based on different health domains and the changes in biopsychosocial variables 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months after implantation. This study is the first to include a biopsychosocial cluster analysis to identify significant patient groups and their response to treatment with SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Raymaekers
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine & Life Science, Hasselt University, Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
| | - Sacha Meeuws
- Department of Neurosurgery Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
| | - Lisa Goudman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- STIMULUS consortium (reSearch & TeachIng neuroModULation Uz bruSsel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- Pain in Motion (PAIN) Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology & Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | | | - Maarten Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- STIMULUS consortium (reSearch & TeachIng neuroModULation Uz bruSsel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- Pain in Motion (PAIN) Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology & Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
- Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Maarten Vanloon
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6211, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk De Ridder
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Tomas Menovsky
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, 2650, Belgium
| | - Jan Vesper
- Department of Stereotactic & Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, 40204, Germany
| | - Mark Plazier
- Faculty of Medicine & Life Science, Hasselt University, Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
- Department of Neurosurgery Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, 3500, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jin H, Witjes B, Roy M, Baillet S, de Vos CC. Neurophysiological oscillatory markers of hypoalgesia in conditioned pain modulation. Pain Rep 2023; 8:e1096. [PMID: 37881810 PMCID: PMC10597579 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is an experimental procedure that consists of an ongoing noxious stimulus attenuating the pain perception caused by another noxious stimulus. A combination of the CPM paradigm with concurrent electrophysiological recordings can establish whether an association exists between experimentally modified pain perception and modulations of neural oscillations. Objectives We aimed to characterize how CPM modifies pain perception and underlying neural oscillations. We also interrogated whether these perceptual and/or neurophysiological effects are distinct in patients affected by chronic pain. Methods We presented noxious electrical stimuli to the right ankle before, during, and after CPM induced by an ice pack placed on the left forearm. Seventeen patients with chronic pain and 17 control participants rated the electrical pain in each experimental condition. We used magnetoencephalography to examine the anatomy-specific effects of CPM on the neural oscillatory responses to the electrical pain. Results Regardless of the participant groups, CPM induced a reduction in subjective pain ratings and neural responses (beta-band [15-35 Hz] oscillations in the sensorimotor cortex) to electrical pain. Conclusion Our findings of pain-induced beta-band activity may be associated with top-down modulations of pain, as reported in other perceptual modalities. Therefore, the reduced beta-band responses during CPM may indicate changes in top-down pain modulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyerang Jin
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Bart Witjes
- Centre for Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathieu Roy
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Sylvain Baillet
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Cecile C. de Vos
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Centre for Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rigoard P, Ounajim A, Moens M, Goudman L, Roulaud M, Lorgeoux B, Baron S, Nivole K, Many M, Lampert L, David R, Billot M. Should we Oppose or Combine Waveforms for Spinal Cord Stimulation in PSPS-T2 Patients? A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial (MULTIWAVE Study). THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:2319-2339. [PMID: 37473903 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after surgery (PSPS-T2) can be successfully addressed by spinal cord stimulation (SCS). While conventional stimulation generates paresthesia, recent systems enable the delivery of paresthesia-free stimulation. Studies have claimed non-inferiority/superiority of selected paresthesia-free stimulation compared with paresthesia-based stimulation, but the comparative efficacy between different waveforms still needs to be determined in a given patient. We designed a randomized controlled 3-month crossover trial to compare pain relief of paresthesia-based stimulation versus high frequency versus burst in 28 PSPS-T2 patients implanted with multiwave SCS systems. Our secondary objectives were to determine the efficacy of these 3 waveforms on pain surface, quality of life, functional capacity, psychological distress, and validated composite multidimensional clinical response index to provide holistic comparisons at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 15-month post-randomization. The preferred stimulation modality was documented during the follow-up periods. No difference between the waveforms was observed in this study (P = .08). SCS led to significant pain relief, quality of life improvement, improvement of multidimensional clinical response index, and of all other clinical outcomes at all follow-up visits. Forty-four percent of the patients chose to keep the paresthesia-based stimulation modality after the 15-month follow-up period. By giving the possibility to switch and/or to combine several waveforms, the overall rate of SCS responders further increased with 25%. In this study, high frequency or burst do not appear superior to paresthesia-based stimulation, wherefore paresthesia-based stimulation should still be considered as a valid option. However, combining paresthesia-based stimulation with paresthesia-free stimulation, through personalized multiwave therapy, might significantly improve SCS responses. PERSPECTIVE: This article assesses clinical SCS efficacy on pain relief, by comparing paresthesia-based stimulation and paresthesia-free stimulation (including high frequency and burst) modalities in patient presenting with PSPS-T2. Switching and/or combining waveforms contribute to increasing the global SCS responders rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Rigoard
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France; Department of Neuro-Spine & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France; Pprime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, Chasseneuil-du-Poitou, France
| | - Amine Ounajim
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Maarten Moens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lisa Goudman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; STIMULUS research group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Bertille Lorgeoux
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Sandrine Baron
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Kévin Nivole
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Mathilde Many
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Lucie Lampert
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Romain David
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France; Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Poitiers University Hospital, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Maxime Billot
- PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kirketeig T, Söreskog E, Jacobson T, Karlsten R, Zethraeus N, Borgström F. Real-world outcomes in spinal cord stimulation: predictors of reported effect and explantation using a comprehensive registry-based approach. Pain Rep 2023; 8:e1107. [PMID: 38027468 PMCID: PMC10653578 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000001107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Despite advancements in implanted hardware and development of novel stimulation paradigms in Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), real world evidence suggests a large variation in patient reported outcomes and a proportion of patients are later explanted due to loss of analgesia. Possible predictors for outcome have been explored in smaller short-term evaluations, but few clinically applicable robust measures for long term outcome have emerged. Methods We performed a comprehensive retrospective study based on an assembled patient-level aggregated database from multiple local and national registries in Sweden. Variables associated with risk of explantation (due to insufficient analgesia) and analgesic effect was analyzed using a Cox regression analysis and an ordered logit regression model, respectively. Results We found the accumulated risk of explantation due to loss of analgesia to be 10% and 21% at two and ten years follow up, respectively. The use of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (compared with Tonic waveform; p = 0.003), and being 60 years or older (reference 18-40 years; p = 0.003) were associated with an increased risk of explantation.At a mean follow up at 1 year, 48% of patients reported a pain intensity reduction from baseline of at least 30%. Secondary (p = 0.030) and post-secondary (p = 0.001) education (compared with primary education) was associated with an increased probability of successful patient reported outcomes. Conclusion This study suggests that a higher educational level and being employed are associated with successful treatment outcome in patients with chronic pain treated with SCS in Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terje Kirketeig
- Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emma Söreskog
- Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Rolf Karlsten
- Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Niklas Zethraeus
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Staats PS, Taylor RS, Gilligan C, Sheth S, Patel KV, Duarte RV, Eldabe S. Limitations of the Cochrane review of spinal cord stimulation for low back pain. Pain Pract 2023; 23:868-872. [PMID: 37427805 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Staats
- National Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, USA
| | - Rod S Taylor
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit & Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Well Being, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Gilligan
- Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Samir Sheth
- Sutter Health System, Roseville, California, USA
| | - Kiran V Patel
- The Spine & Pain Institute of New York, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rui V Duarte
- Saluda Medical Pty Ltd., Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sam Eldabe
- Department of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Schwarm FP, Rehman R, Nagl J, Gött H, Uhl E, Kolodziej MA. Does lumbar spinal decompression or fusion surgery influence outcome parameters in patients with intrathecal morphine treatment for persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2 (PSPS-T2). Scand J Pain 2023; 23:677-686. [PMID: 37667441 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intrathecal morphine pump (ITMP) infusion therapy is efficient in managing chronic pain refractory to standard treatment. This study evaluates pain relief and improvement of quality of life in chronic pain patients after intrathecal morphine pump implantation for treatment of persistent pain after lumbar spinal fusion surgery and lumbar spinal decompression alone. METHODS Forty three chronic pain patients that received an ITMP at our department between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed divided into 2 cohorts (lumbar spinal fusion surgery and lumbar spinal decompression alone). Pain intensity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS), quality of life was assessed by EQ-5D-3L, mental health was assessed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-V), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Morphine dosage was assessed over time. Data was collected preoperatively, 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using Friedman's analysis of variance to evaluate the development of NRS, PCS, BDI and EQ-5D-3L over time and Mann-Whitney-U-test for the differences between these parameters in the different cohorts. A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Median age was 64 years (IQR25-75 56-71 years). NRS, EQ-5D-3L, BDI-V, and PCS showed a significant overall improvement after 6 and 24 months compared to baseline data (p<0.001). No statistically significant differences between patients with lumbar spinal fusion surgery and lumbar spinal decompression alone were seen. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences for age and gender were seen. The initially administered median morphine dosage was significantly higher in the fusion group (3.0 mg/day; IQR25-75 1.5-4.2 mg/day) compared to the decompression-alone group (1.5 mg/day; IQR25-75 1.0-2.6 mg/day); (p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS This retrospective study showed that ITMP have a major long-term impact on pain relief, improve the quality of life, psychological distress, as well as pain catastrophizing in patients with chronic pain following lumbar spinal surgery independent of the previous surgical procedure. After ITMP implantation initial median morphine dosage seems to be significantly higher after spinal fusion compared to decompressive surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raza Rehman
- Department of Neurosurgery Hospital Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jasmin Nagl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Hanna Gött
- Department of Neurosurgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Eberhard Uhl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dario A, Capelli S. The treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome with epidural pulsed radiofrequency: improvement of the technique. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1236270. [PMID: 37909029 PMCID: PMC10613645 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1236270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS), Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF) is a used procedure. The results of PRF in PSPS performed with an electrode placed through the sacral hiatus were reported to be successful on pain in only 32% of patients. We have tried to improve the results by applying a new system to PRF. Methods Ten patients were treated with PRF application through a steerable epidural catheter with a reference electrode outside the foramen. This method was named "Optimization Current Flow" (OCF). The duty cycle of PRF was 2 × 10 msec and total exposure time was 150 s. Follow up was planned for 1, 3, and 6 months. The NRS score was considered to be the primary outcome. Results In the first 10 patients treatment was successful (69% of the patients) at 6 months follow-up. Conclusion This new modality of PRF in patients with PSPS seems to be superior to procedures done with a needle. Further prospective double-blind randomized long-term studies with a significant number of patients are required to validate this technique as there is a need to improve PRF results in PSPS.
Collapse
|
30
|
Delaney FT, MacMahon PJ. An update on epidural steroid injections: is there still a role for particulate corticosteroids? Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:1863-1871. [PMID: 36171350 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04186-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) play an important role in the multifaceted management of neck and back pain. Corticosteroid preparations used in ESIs may be considered "particulate" or "non-particulate" based on whether they form a crystalline suspension or a soluble clear solution, respectively. In the past two decades, there have been reports of rare but severe and permanent neurological complications as a result of ESI. These complications have principally occurred with particulate corticosteroid preparations when using a transforaminal injection technique at cervical or thoracic levels, and only rarely in the lumbosacral spine. As a result, some published clinical guidelines and recommendations have advised against the use of particulate corticosteroids for transforaminal ESI, and the FDA introduced a warning label for injectable corticosteroids regarding the risk of serious neurological adverse events. There is growing evidence that the efficacy of non-particulate corticosteroids for pain relief and functional improvement after ESI is non-inferior to particulate agents, and that non-particulate injections almost never result in permanent neurological injury. Despite this, particulate corticosteroids continue to be routinely used for transforaminal epidural injections. More consistent clinical guidelines and societal recommendations are required alongside increased awareness of the comparative efficacy of non-particulate agents among specialists who perform ESIs. The current role for particulate corticosteroids in ESIs should be limited to caudal and interlaminar approaches, or transforaminal injections in the lumbar spine only if initial non-particulate ESI resulted in a significant but short-lived improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis T Delaney
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Peter J MacMahon
- Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rajkumar S, Venkatraman V, Yang LZ, Parente B, Lee HJ, Lad SP. Short-Term Health Care Costs of High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Postsurgical Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1450-1458. [PMID: 36872148 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) is a treatment option for postsurgical persistent spinal pain syndrome (type 2 PSPS). We aimed to determine the health care costs associated with this therapy in a nationwide cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS IBM Marketscan® Research Databases were used to identify patients who underwent HF-SCS implantation from 2016 to 2019. Inclusion criteria included prior spine surgery or diagnoses of PSPS or postlaminectomy pain syndrome any time within the two years before implantation. Inpatient and outpatient service costs, medication costs, and out-of-pocket costs were collected six months before implantation (baseline) and one, three, and six months after implantation. The six-month explant rate was calculated. Costs were compared between baseline and six months after implant via Wilcoxon sign rank test. RESULTS In total, 332 patients were included. At baseline, patients incurred median total costs of $15,393 (Q1: $9,266, Q3: $26,216), whereas the postimplant median total costs excluding device acquisition were $727 (Q1: $309, Q3: $1,765) at one month, $2,840 (Q1: $1,170, Q3: $6,026) at three months, and $6,380 (Q1: $2,805, Q3: $12,637) at six months. The average total cost was reduced from $21,410 (SD $21,230) from baseline to $14,312 (SD $25,687) at six months after implant for an average reduction of $7,237 (95% CI = $3212-$10,777, p < 0.001). The median device acquisition costs were $42,937 (Q1: $30,102, Q3: $65,880). The explant rate within six months was 3.4% (8/234). CONCLUSIONS HF-SCS for PSPS was associated with significant decreases in total health care costs and offsets acquisition costs within 2.4 years. With the rising incidence of PSPS, it will be critical to use clinically effective and cost-efficient therapies for treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank Rajkumar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Vishal Venkatraman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Beth Parente
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hui-Jie Lee
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shivanand P Lad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
West T, Driver CN, D'Souza RS. Incidence of Neuraxial and Non-Neuraxial Hematoma Complications From Spinal Cord Stimulator Surgery: Systematic Review and Proportional Meta-Analysis. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1328-1338. [PMID: 35985940 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of total hematomas, neuraxial hematomas, and non-neuraxial hematomas in patients who underwent temporary spinal cord stimulator (SCS) lead trial placement and permanent implantation of SCS leads and internal pulse generator (IPG). MATERIALS AND METHODS A comprehensive search was conducted of databases of any publications before October 21, 2021. Eligible study designs included randomized control trials and prospective or retrospective observational studies with more than ten patients. The primary outcome variables were the incidences of total hematomas, neuraxial hematomas, and non-neuraxial hematomas in patients with SCS. These dichotomous categorical outcomes were abstracted from studies after Freeman-Tukey arcsine square root transformation using random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian and Laird method). Pooled incidence rates and 95% CIs were calculated for each outcome variable. RESULTS A total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria. Included in the neuraxial and non-neuraxial hematoma analyses were 4751 patients and 3862 patients, respectively. The pooled incidence of any hematoma in patients with SCS was 0.81% (95% CI, 0.45%-1.27%). The pooled incidence of neuraxial hematoma in patients with SCS was 0.32% (95% CI, 0.18%-0.50%). This included primarily epidural hematomas (11/4751) but also comprised an intracranial hemorrhage in a patient on enoxaparin bridge therapy from warfarin and one patient not on anticoagulation with an intracranial subdural hematoma that resulted in death. The pooled incidence of non-neuraxial hematomas in patients with SCS was 0.59% (95% CI, 0.29%-1.00%). CONCLUSION The overall incidence of hematomas in patients with temporary SCS trial lead placement and permanent SCS/IPG implantations is less than 1%. Furthermore, the incidence of neuraxial hematomas is less than 0.5%, which is of particular interest given the potential devastating consequences of this complication. The results of this study can be used to inform patients and implanting physicians on hematoma complications from SCS and highlight that the benefits of SCS outweigh the hematoma risks if anticoagulation is appropriately managed perioperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler West
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - C Noelle Driver
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Deer T, Gilligan C, Falowski S, Desai M, Pilitsis J, Jameson J, Moeschler S, Heros R, Tavel E, Christopher A, Patterson D, Wahezi S, Weisbein J, Antony A, Funk R, Ibrahim M, Lim C, Wilson D, Fishell M, Scarfo K, Dickerson D, Braun E, Buchanan P, Levy RM, Miller N, Duncan J, Xu J, Candido K, Kreiner S, Fahey ME, Yue J. Treatment of Refractory Low Back Pain Using Passive Recharge Burst in Patients Without Options for Corrective Surgery: Findings and Results From the DISTINCT Study, a Prospective Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial. Neuromodulation 2023; 26:1387-1399. [PMID: 37642628 PMCID: PMC10801705 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for relieving chronic intractable pain conditions. The Dorsal spInal cord STImulatioN vs mediCal management for the Treatment of low back pain study evaluates the effectiveness of SCS compared with conventional medical management (CMM) in the treatment of chronic low back pain in patients who had not undergone and were not candidates for lumbar spine surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients were randomized to passive recharge burst therapy (n = 162) or CMM (n = 107). They reported severe pain and disability for more than a decade and had failed a multitude of therapies. Common diagnoses included degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, stenosis, and scoliosis-yet not to a degree amenable to surgery. The six-month primary end point compared responder rates, defined by a 50% reduction in pain. Hierarchical analyses of seven secondary end points were performed in the following order: composite responder rate (numerical rating scale [NRS] or Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), NRS, ODI, Pain Catastrophizing Scale responder rate, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) responder rate, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System-29 in pain interference and physical function. RESULTS Intention-to-treat analysis showed a significant difference in pain responders on NRS between SCS (72.6%) and CMM (7.1%) arms (p < 0.0001). Of note, 85.2% of those who received six months of therapy responded on NRS compared with 6.2% of those with CMM (p < 0.0001). All secondary end points indicated the superiority of burst therapy over CMM. A composite measure on function or pain relief showed 91% of subjects with SCS improved, compared with 16% of subjects with CMM. A substantial improvement of 30 points was observed on ODI compared with a CONCLUSIONS This study found substantial improvement at six months in back pain, back pain-related disability, pain-related emotional suffering, PGIC, pain interference, and physical function in a population with severe, debilitating back pain for more than a decade. These improvements were reported in conjunction with reduced opioid use, injection, and ablation therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT04479787.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Deer
- The Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA
| | | | | | - Mehul Desai
- International Spine, Pain & Performance Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Edward Tavel
- Clinical Trials of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | | | - Sayed Wahezi
- Montefiore Medical Center-Waters Place, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mohab Ibrahim
- Banner University Medical Center Tucson Campus, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Chi Lim
- Carolina Orthopaedic & Neurosurgical Associates, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Buchanan
- Spanish Hills Interventional Pain Specialists, Camarillo, CA, USA
| | | | - Nathan Miller
- Coastal Pain & Spinal Diagnostics Medical Group, Carlsbad, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Duncan
- Burkhart Research Institute for Orthopaedics, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Jijun Xu
- The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Witkam RL, Burmeister LS, Van Goethem JWM, van der Kolk AG, Vissers KCP, Henssen DJHA. Microstructural Changes in the Spinothalamic Tract of CPSS Patients: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1370. [PMID: 37891739 PMCID: PMC10605620 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13101370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic pain after spinal surgery (CPSS), formerly known as failed back surgery syndrome, encompasses a variety of highly incapacitating chronic pain syndromes emerging after spinal surgery. The intractability of CPSS makes objective parameters that could aid classification and treatment essential. In this study, we investigated the use of cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS Cerebral 3T diffusion-weighted (DW-) MRI data from adult CPSS patients were assessed and compared with those of healthy controls matched by age and gender. Only imaging data without relevant artefacts or significant pathologies were included. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated from the b0 and b1000 values using nonlinear regression. After skull stripping and affine registration of all imaging data, ADC values for fifteen anatomical regions were calculated and analyzed with independent samples T-tests. RESULTS A total of 32 subjects were included (sixteen CPSS patients and sixteen controls). The mean ADC value of the spinothalamic tract was found to be significantly higher in CPSS patients compared with in healthy controls (p = 0.013). The other anatomical regions did not show statistically different ADC values between the two groups. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that patients suffering from CPSS are subject to microstructural changes, predominantly within the cerebral spinothalamic tract. Additional research could possibly lead to imaging biomarkers derived from ADC values in CPSS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L. Witkam
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lara S. Burmeister
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anja G. van der Kolk
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kris C. P. Vissers
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Dylan J. H. A. Henssen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Miękisiak G. Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: No Longer a Surgeon's Defeat-A Narrative Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1255. [PMID: 37512066 PMCID: PMC10384667 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59071255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of the term Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS-T1/2), replacing the older term Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS), has significantly influenced our approach to diagnosing and treating post-surgical spinal pain. This comprehensive review discusses this change and its effects on patient care. Various diagnostic methods are employed to elucidate the underlying causes of back pain, and this information is critical in guiding treatment decisions. The management of PSPS-T1/2 involves both causative treatments, which directly address the root cause of pain, and symptomatic treatments, which focus on managing the symptoms of pain and improving overall function. The importance of a multidisciplinary and holistic approach is emphasized in the treatment of PSPS-T1/2. This approach is patient-centered and treatment plans are customized to individual patient needs and circumstances. The review concludes with a reflection on the impact of the new PSPS nomenclature on the perception and management of post-surgical spinal pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grzegorz Miękisiak
- Institute of Medicine, University of Opole, 45-040 Opole, Poland
- Vratislavia Medica Hospital, 51-134 Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Witkam RL, Kragt EAM, Arnts IJJ, Bronkhorst EM, van Dongen R, Kurt E, Steegers MAH, van Haren FGAM, Maandag NJG, Gort C, Henssen DJHA, Wegener JT, Vissers KCP. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: to Trial or Not to Trial? THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:1298-1306. [PMID: 36878384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a recommended therapy to treat failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). A trial period is practiced to enhance patient selection. However, its fundamental evidence is limited, especially concerning long-term benefit and therapy safety. We compared the long-term (5.3 ± 4.0 years) clinical outcome and therapy safety of a trialed and nontrialed implantation strategy, including multidimensional variables and pain intensity fluctuations over time. A multicenter cohort analysis was performed in 2 comparable groups of FBSS patients. Regarding eligibility, patients had to be treated with SCS for at least 3 months. While the Trial group comprised patients who underwent an SCS implantation after a successful trial, the No-Trial group encompassed patients who underwent complete implantation within 1 session. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity scores and complications. The Trial and No-Trial groups consisted of 194 and 376 patients (N = 570), respectively. A statistically but not clinically significant difference in pain intensity (P = .003; effect = 0.506 (.172-.839)) was found in favor of the Trial group. No interaction between a time dependency effect and pain intensity was noted. Whereas trialed SCS patients were more likely to cease opioid usage (P = .003; OR = .509 (.326-.792)), patients in the No-Trial group endured fewer infections (P = .006; proportion difference = .43 (.007-.083)). Although the clinical relevance of our findings should be proven in future studies, this long-term real-world data study indicates that patient-centered assessments on whether an SCS trial should be performed have to be investigated. According to the current ambiguous evidence, SCS trials should be considered on a case-by-case basis. PERSPECTIVE: The currently available comparative evidence, together with our results, remains ambiguous on which SCS implantation strategy might be deemed superior. An SCS trial should be considered on a case-by-case basis, for which further investigation of its clinical utility in certain patient populations or character traits is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Witkam
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Elisabeth A M Kragt
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge J J Arnts
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ewald M Bronkhorst
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert van Dongen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Erkan Kurt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique A H Steegers
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank G A M van Haren
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Natasja J G Maandag
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees Gort
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Dylan J H A Henssen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica T Wegener
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Kris C P Vissers
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Provenzano DA, Heller JA. Daring discourse: economics of neuromodulation for the treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:288-295. [PMID: 37080579 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
The treatment options for patients with chronic pain conditions are impacted by recent research, patient needs, and insurance coverage. Although various factors affect the cost of healthcare, the economic burden on the patient and the healthcare system must be considered when choosing the appropriate treatments for each patient. This Daring Discourse aims to review and further clarify existing economic evaluations and thus examine cost-effectiveness with regards to neuromodulation for the treatment of persistent spinal pain syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome. Specific consideration is given to spinal cord stimulation, as it is a widely studied and implemented neuromodulation modality for the treatment of these debilitating conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jared Aaron Heller
- Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care, Sewickley, Pennsylvania, USA
- West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chow C, Rosenquist R. Trends in spinal cord stimulation utilization: change, growth and implications for the future. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2023; 48:296-301. [PMID: 37080580 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain impacts more than 100 million Americans and has a significant impact on the economy and quality of life. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has demonstrated efficacy in managing a growing number of chronic pain conditions. This in combination with an increasing number of physicians trained in SCS placement has produced significant changes in utilization, expense and sites of service related to SCS. In particular, there has been a large increase in SCS placement by non-surgeons, use of percutaneous leads and performance in ambulatory surgery centers instead of inpatient settings. There are also notable differences in SCS use related to age, race, insurance coverage and geography. There is a large potential market and use of these therapies is predicted to grow from $2.41 billion in 2020 to $4.12 billion US dollars globally by 2027. At the same time, there is increasing scrutiny around utilization of this therapy related to cost, complications, long-term efficacy and explant rates that has the potential to impact access to this therapy in the future. We must examine our indications, technique and management to optimize outcomes and utilization of SCS going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Chow
- Department of Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Burkey AR, Chen J, Argoff CE, Edgar DR, Petersen EA. Painful Peripheral Neuropathies of the Lower Limbs and/or Lower Extremities Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis. J Pain Res 2023; 16:1607-1636. [PMID: 37229154 PMCID: PMC10202826 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s403715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Painful peripheral neuropathy (PPN) is a debilitating condition with varied etiologies. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is increasingly used when conservative treatments fail to provide adequate pain relief. Few published reviews have examined SCS outcomes in all forms of PPN. Methods We conducted a systematic review of SCS in PPN. The PubMed database was searched up to February 7th, 2022, for peer-reviewed studies of SCS that enrolled PPN patients with pain symptoms in their lower limbs and/or lower extremities. We assessed the quality of randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data were tabulated and presented narratively. Results Twenty eligible studies documented SCS treatment in PPN patients, including 10 kHz SCS, traditional low-frequency SCS (t-SCS), dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), and burst SCS. In total, 451 patients received a permanent implant (10 kHz SCS, n=267; t-SCS, n=147; DRGS, n=25; burst SCS, n=12). Approximately 88% of implanted patients had painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Overall, we found clinically meaningful pain relief (≥30%) with all SCS modalities. Among the studies, RCTs supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS to treat PDN, with 10 kHz SCS providing a higher reduction in pain (76%) than t-SCS (38-55%). Pain relief with 10 kHz SCS and DRGS in other PPN etiologies ranged from 42-81%. In addition, 66-71% of PDN patients and 38% of nondiabetic PPN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS. Conclusion Our review found clinically meaningful pain relief in PPN patients after SCS treatment. RCT evidence supported the use of 10 kHz SCS and t-SCS in the diabetic neuropathy subpopulation, with more robust pain relief evident with 10 kHz SCS. Outcomes in other PPN etiologies were also promising for 10 kHz SCS. In addition, a majority of PDN patients experienced neurological improvement with 10 kHz SCS, as did a notable subset of nondiabetic PPN patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey Chen
- UCSD Department of Anesthesiology Center for Pain, University of California San Diego Medical Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Erika A Petersen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Simpson B, Rigoard P, Russo M. Persistent spinal pain syndrome - the coup de grace for failed back surgery syndrome? Neurochirurgie 2023; 69:101438. [PMID: 37060847 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2023.101438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Simpson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, CF14 4XW Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| | - Philippe Rigoard
- Department of Spinal Neurosurgery, Neuromodulation & Surgery for Handicap, Poitiers University Hospital, CHU of Poitiers, 6, rue de la Milétrie, 86000 Poitiers, France
| | - Marc Russo
- School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, 2308 Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Simpson B, Christelis N, Russo M, Stanton-Hicks M, Barolat G, Thomson S. Persistent spinal pain syndrome: a proposed replacement for failed back surgery syndrome. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37:244. [PMID: 34678087 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1981246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Simpson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK, (Retired)
| | | | - Marc Russo
- Hunter Pain Specialists, Broadmeadow, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Simon Thomson
- Mid and South Essex University Hospitals, Basildon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Trager RJ, Daniels CJ, Meyer KW, Stout AC, Dusek JA. Clinician approaches to spinal manipulation for persistent spinal pain after lumbar surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:10. [PMID: 36895028 PMCID: PMC9999664 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00481-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review aimed to identify variables influencing clinicians' application of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) for persistent spine pain after lumbar surgery (PSPS-2). We hypothesized markers of reduced clinical/surgical complexity would be associated with greater odds of applying SMT to the lumbar region, use of manual-thrust lumbar SMT, and SMT within 1-year post-surgery as primary outcomes; and chiropractors would have increased odds of using lumbar manual-thrust-SMT compared to other practitioners. METHODS Per our published protocol, observational studies describing adults receiving SMT for PSPS-2 were included. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, OVID, PEDro, and Index to Chiropractic Literature were searched from inception to January 6, 2022. Individual patient data (IPD) were requested from contact authors when needed for selection criteria. Data extraction and a customized risk-of-bias rubric were completed in duplicate. Odds ratios (ORs) for primary outcomes were calculated using binary logistic regressions, with covariates including age, sex, symptom distribution, provider, motion segments, spinal implant, and surgery-to-SMT interval. RESULTS 71 articles were included describing 103 patients (mean age 52 ± 15, 55% male). The most common surgeries were laminectomy (40%), fusion (34%), and discectomy (29%). Lumbar SMT was used in 85% of patients; and of these patients was non-manual-thrust in 59%, manual-thrust in 33%, and unclear in 8%. Clinicians were most often chiropractors (68%). SMT was used > 1-year post-surgery in 66% of cases. While no primary outcomes reached significance, non-reduced motion segments approached significance for predicting use of lumbar-manual-thrust SMT (OR 9.07 [0.97-84.64], P = 0.053). Chiropractors were significantly more likely to use lumbar-manual-thrust SMT (OR 32.26 [3.17-327.98], P = 0.003). A sensitivity analysis omitting high risk-of-bias cases (missing ≥ 25% IPD) revealed similar results. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians using SMT for PSPS-2 most often apply non-manual-thrust SMT to the lumbar spine, while chiropractors are more likely to use lumbar-manual-thrust SMT relative to other providers. As non-manual-thrust SMT may be gentler, the proclivity towards this technique suggests providers are cautious when applying SMT after lumbar surgery. Unmeasured variables such as patient or clinician preferences, or limited sample size may have influenced our findings. Large observational studies and/or international surveys are needed for an improved understanding of SMT use for PSPS-2. Systematic review registration PROSPERO (CRD42021250039).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Trager
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. .,College of Chiropractic, Logan University, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.
| | - Clinton J Daniels
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Rehabilitation Care Services, 9600 Veterans Drive, Tacoma, WA, 98493, USA
| | - Kevin W Meyer
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Rehabilitation Care Services, 9600 Veterans Drive, Tacoma, WA, 98493, USA
| | - Amber C Stout
- Lakeside Hospital Library, Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Jeffery A Dusek
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mons MR, Chapman KB, Terwiel C, Joosten EA, Kallewaard JW. A prospective study of BurstDR™ spinal cord stimulation for non-operated discogenic low back pain. Pain Pract 2023; 23:234-241. [PMID: 36373868 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP) is caused by degeneration of the disc due to trauma to the annulus or by unprovoked degeneration, resulting in chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) employing the BurstDR™ waveform has been shown to be an effective treatment in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The aim of this prospective case study was to determine the effect of BurstDR™ SCS on pain relief, disability, and patient satisfaction in a population with CD-LBP. METHODS Seventeen subjects with CD-LBP received a SCS trial with BurstDR™ stimulation. Patients with >50% pain relief after a trial period of 2 weeks were permanently implanted (n = 15). Patients then rated LBP and leg pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EQ-5D quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain at baseline following trial, 3, 6, and 12 months after permanent implantation. RESULTS Treatment with BurstDR™ SCS resulted in significant reduction of LBP as the NRS was reduced from 71.7 ± 7.3 at baseline to 42.5 ± 18.1 at 12 months. Average pain relief at 12 months was 42.5%. In patients with leg pain (n = 8), pain was significantly reduced from 66.9 ± 8.2 to 11.7 ± 10.4 at 12 months. PainDETECT scores for neuropathic pain significantly reduced from 18.9 ± 4.8 at baseline, and 14.8 ± 3.2 at 12 months. Baseline ODI score significantly reduced from 41.2 ± 12.8 to 25.8 ± 8.6 at 12 months. PGIC scores remained low from 2.6 ± 1.6 at 3 months, 2.5 ± 1.0 at 6 months, and 2.5 ± 1.3 at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L rates remained constant from baseline 56.10 ± 23.9 to 68.6 ± 12.9 at 12 months. CONCLUSION BurstDR™ SCS resulted in significant reduction of back pain, leg pain, and quality of life in patients with CD-LBP and decreased the level of disability and generated positive patient satisfaction scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn R Mons
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University Pain Clinic Maastricht (UPCM) Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth B Chapman
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, New York, USA.,Departement of Anesthesiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Chris Terwiel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management Arnhem, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Elbert A Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University Pain Clinic Maastricht (UPCM) Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Translational Neuroscience, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem Kallewaard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management Arnhem, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Managmenent, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Robert C, Wilson CS. Thirty-year survey of bibliometrics used in the research literature of pain: Analysis, evolution, and pitfalls. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1071453. [PMID: 36937565 PMCID: PMC10017016 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1071453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
Abstract
During the last decades, the emergence of Bibliometrics and the progress in Pain research have led to a proliferation of bibliometric studies on the medical and scientific literature of pain (B/P). This study charts the evolution of the B/P literature published during the last 30 years. Using various searching techniques, 189 B/P studies published from 1993 to August 2022 were collected for analysis-half were published since 2018. Most of the selected B/P publications use classic bibliometric analysis of Pain in toto, while some focus on specific types of Pain with Headache/Migraine, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, and Cancer Pain dominating. Each study is characterized by the origin (geographical, economical, institutional, …) and the medical/scientific context over a specified time span to provide a detailed landscape of the Pain research literature. Some B/P studies have been developed to pinpoint difficulties in appropriately identifying the Pain literature or to highlight some general publishing pitfalls. Having observed that most of the recent B/P studies have integrated newly emergent software visualization tools (SVTs), we found an increase of anomalies and suggest that readers exercise caution when interpreting results in the B/P literature details.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Concepción Shimizu Wilson
- School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Goudman L, Putman K, Van Doorslaer L, Billot M, Roulaud M, Rigoard P, Moens M. Proportion of clinical holistic responders in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type II treated by subthreshold spinal cord stimulation compared to best medical treatment: a study protocol for a multicentric randomised controlled trial (TRADITION). Trials 2023; 24:120. [PMID: 36803412 PMCID: PMC9940414 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07140-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrating information on bodily functions, pain intensity and quality of life into one composite measure of a holistic responder has recently been proposed as a useful method to evaluate treatment efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with therapy-refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome type II (PSPS-T2). Previous studies already demonstrated the efficacy of standard SCS over best medical treatment (BMT) and the superiority of new subthreshold (i.e. paresthesia free) SCS paradigms compared to standard SCS. Nevertheless, the efficacy of subthreshold SCS compared to BMT has not yet been investigated in patients with PSPS-T2, neither with unidimensional outcomes nor with a composite measure. The current objective is to examine whether subthreshold SCS, compared to BMT, provided to patients with PSPS-T2 results in a different proportion of clinical holistic responders (as composite measure) at 6 months. METHODS A two-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial will be conducted whereby 114 patients will be randomised (1:1) to (a) BMT or (b) paresthesia-free SCS. After a follow-up period of 6 months (primary time endpoint), patients receive the opportunity to cross over towards the other treatment group. The primary outcome is the proportion of clinical holistic responders at 6 months (i.e. a composite measure of pain intensity, medication, disability, health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction). The secondary outcomes are work status, self-management, anxiety, depression and healthcare expenditure. DISCUSSION Within the TRADITION project, we propose to shift the focus from a unidimensional outcome measure towards a composite measure as primary outcome measure to evaluate the efficacy of currently used subthreshold SCS paradigms. The lack of methodologically rigorous trials exploring the clinical efficacy and socio-economic consequences of subthreshold SCS paradigms is pressing, especially in light of the growing burden of PSPS-T2 on the society. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05169047. Registered on December 23, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Goudman
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,Department of Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. .,Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Egmontstraat 5, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Koen Putman
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Leen Van Doorslaer
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maxime Billot
- grid.411162.10000 0000 9336 4276PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - Manuel Roulaud
- grid.411162.10000 0000 9336 4276PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France
| | - Philippe Rigoard
- grid.411162.10000 0000 9336 4276PRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France ,grid.411162.10000 0000 9336 4276Department of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France ,grid.434217.70000 0001 2178 9782Pprime Institute UPR 3346, CNRS, ISAE-ENSMA, University of Poitiers, 86360 Chasseneuil-du-Poitou, France
| | | | - Maarten Moens
- grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium ,grid.411326.30000 0004 0626 3362Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium ,grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium ,grid.8767.e0000 0001 2290 8069Department of Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium ,grid.411326.30000 0004 0626 3362Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Neurochirurgia del dolore. Neurologia 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/s1634-7072(22)47347-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
|
47
|
Chu ECP, Trager RJ, Tao C. Improvement of Chronic Neck Pain After Posterior Atlantoaxial Surgical Fusion via Multimodal Chiropractic Care: A Case Report. Cureus 2023; 15:e34630. [PMID: 36891015 PMCID: PMC9988189 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a lack of research regarding the effectiveness and safety of manual therapies, including spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), for patients with previous cervical spine surgery. A 66-year-old, otherwise healthy, woman who underwent C1/2 posterior surgical fusion for rotatory instability during adolescence presented to a chiropractor with a six-month history of progressive worsening of chronic neck pain and headaches despite acetaminophen, tramadol, and physical therapy. Upon examination, the chiropractor noted postural changes, limited cervical range of motion, and muscle hypertonicity. Computed tomography revealed a successful C1/2 fusion, and degenerative findings at C0/1, C2/3, C3/4, and C5/6, without cord compression. As the patient had no neurologic deficits or myelopathy and tolerated spinal mobilization well, the chiropractor applied cervical SMT, along with soft tissue manipulation, ultrasound therapy, mechanical traction, and thoracic SMT. The patient's pain was reduced to a mild level and the range of motion improved over three weeks of treatment. Benefits were maintained over a three-month follow-up as treatments were spaced apart. Despite the apparent success in the current case, evidence for manual therapies and SMT in patients with cervical spine surgery remains limited, and these therapies should be used with caution on an individual patient basis. Further research is needed to examine the safety of manual therapies and SMT in patients following cervical spine surgery and determine predictors of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Chun-Pu Chu
- Department of Chiropractic and Physiotherapy, New York Chiropractic and Physiotherapy Centre, Kowloon, HKG
| | - Robert J Trager
- Chiropractic, Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
| | - Cliff Tao
- Radiology, Private Practice of Chiropractic Radiology, Irvine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lim Y, Park H. The Effects of Auricular Acupressure on Low Back Pain, Neuropathy and Sleep in Patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS): A Single-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:1705. [PMID: 36767071 PMCID: PMC9913948 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20031705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Various procedures were performed on patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS), but the clinical effect and safety were insufficient. The study was to examine the effects of auricular acupressure (AA) on low back pain, neuropathy, and sleep in patients on PSPS. (2) Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted from 1 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. The participants who had at least one lumbar surgery were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n = 26) or the placebo control group (n = 25). All participants received 6 weeks of AA intervention. To validate the effects of the intervention, pressure pain thresholds (PPT), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), douleur neuropathique 4 (DN4) questions, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and actigraphy with a Fitbit Alta were conducted. The data were analyzed with SPSS/WIN ver. 27.0, using a t-test and repeated-measures ANOVA. (3) Results: The findings showed that there were significant differences in pain (back VAS p = 0.003, leg VAS p = 0.002, PPT p = 0.008), neuropathy (DN4 p = 0.034), and sleep actigraphy (sleep efficiency p = 0.038, number of awake p = 0.001, deep sleep stage p = 0.017). (4) Conclusions: We conclude that AA is an effective, safe, cost-effective, non-invasive nursing intervention that can improve pain, neuropathy, and sleep in patients on PSPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunmi Lim
- Department of Spine Center, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyojung Park
- College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Witjes B, Baillet S, Roy M, Oostenveld R, Huygen FJPM, de Vos CC. Heterogeneous Cortical Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2023:S1094-7159(22)01405-2. [PMID: 36631377 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The understanding of the cortical effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) remains limited. Multiple studies have investigated the effects of SCS in resting-state electroencephalography. However, owing to the large variation in reported outcomes, we aimed to describe the differential cortical responses between two types of SCS and between responders and nonresponders using magnetoencephalography (MEG). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted 5-minute resting-state MEG recordings in 25 patients with chronic pain with active SCS in three sessions, each after a one-week exposure to tonic, burst, or sham SCS. We extracted six spectral features from the measured neurophysiological signals: the alpha peak frequency; alpha power ratio (power 7-9 Hz/power 9-11 Hz); and average power in the theta (4-7.5 Hz), alpha (8-12.5 Hz), beta (13-30 Hz), and low-gamma (30.5-60 Hz) frequency bands. We compared these features (using nonparametric permutation t-tests) for MEG sensor and cortical map effects across stimulation paradigms, between participants who reported low (< 5, responders) vs high (≥ 5, nonresponders) pain scores, and in three representative participants. RESULTS We found statistically significant (p < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected) increased MEG sensor signal power below 3 Hz in response to burst SCS compared with tonic and sham SCS. We did not find statistically significant differences (all p > 0.05) between the power spectra of responders and nonresponders. Our data did not show statistically significant differences in the spectral features of interest among the three stimulation paradigms or between responders and nonresponders. These results were confirmed by the MEG cortical maps. However, we did identify certain trends in the MEG source maps for all comparisons and several features, with substantial variation across participants. CONCLUSIONS The considerable variation in cortical responses to the various SCS treatment options necessitates studies with sample sizes larger than commonly reported in the field and more personalized treatment plans. Studies with a finer stratification between responders and nonresponders are required to advance the knowledge on SCS treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart Witjes
- Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sylvain Baillet
- Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mathieu Roy
- Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Robert Oostenveld
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; NatMEG, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frank J P M Huygen
- Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cecile C de Vos
- Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Higashiyama N, Tamura S, Sugawara T. Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study. Pain Res Manag 2023; 2023:2136562. [PMID: 37200968 PMCID: PMC10188261 DOI: 10.1155/2023/2136562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) refers to a condition where symptoms such as low back pain, leg pain, and numbness persist or recur after lumbar surgery; it has been reported to occur in 10%-40% of patients who have undergone lumbar surgery. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been reported useful for low back and leg pain due to FBSS. In this study, we studied the efficacy and safety of SCS for FBSS in older adults. Methods Among FBSS patients who underwent an SCS trial between November 2017 and December 2020, those with at least 50% pain reduction during the trial phase who requested spinal cord stimulator implantation underwent implantation of a stimulator under local anesthesia. The patients were divided into two groups: patients aged <75 years (<75-year-old group) and patients aged ≥75 years (≥75-year-old group). The male/female ratio, symptom duration, operative duration, visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and after one year of surgery, responder rate (RR), complications one year after surgery, and stimulator removal rate were analyzed. Results There were 27 cases in the <75-year-old group and 46 in the ≥75-year-old group, with no significant differences in male/female ratio, duration of pain, or operative time between the two groups. VAS scores for low back pain, leg pain, and overall pain one year after surgery were improved significantly from respective preoperative scores in both groups (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in low back pain VAS, leg pain VAS, overall pain VAS, RR, complications one year after surgery, or stimulator removal rate between the two groups. Conclusion SCS reduced pain effectively in both <75-year-old and ≥75-year-old groups with no differences in complications. Therefore, spinal cord stimulator implantation was considered a viable option for FBSS treatment in older adults because it can be performed under local anesthesia and is associated with a low incidence of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Higashiyama
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan
| | - Shinya Tamura
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan
| | - Taku Sugawara
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Akita Cerebrospinal and Cardiovascular Center, Akita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|