Innervation of the Human Intervertebral Disc: A Scoping Review

Sensory nerve regulation of bone homeostasis: Emerging therapeutic opportunities for bone-related diseases

Understanding the intricate interplay between sensory nerves and bone tissue cells is of paramount significance in the field of bone biology and clinical medicine. The regulatory role of sensory nerves in bone homeostasis offers a novel perspective for the development of targeted therapeutic interventions for a spectrum of bone-related diseases, including osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and intervertebral disc degeneration. By elucidating the mechanisms through which sensory nerves and their neuropeptides influence the differentiation and function of bone tissue cells, this review aims to shed light on emerging therapeutic targets that harness the neuro-skeletal axis for the treatment and management of debilitating bone disorders. Moreover, a comprehensive understanding of sensory nerve-mediated bone regulation may pave the way for the development of innovative strategies to promote bone health and mitigate the burden of skeletal pathologies in clinical practice.

Stimuli-Responsive Delivery Systems for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

As a major cause of low back pain, intervertebral disc degeneration is an increasingly prevalent chronic disease worldwide that leads to huge annual financial losses. The intervertebral disc consists of the inner nucleus pulposus, outer annulus fibrosus, and sandwiched cartilage endplates. All these factors collectively participate in maintaining the structure and physiological functions of the disc. During the unavoidable degeneration stage, the degenerated discs are surrounded by a harsh microenvironment characterized by acidic, oxidative, inflammatory, and chaotic cytokine expression. Loss of stem cell markers, imbalance of the extracellular matrix, increase in inflammation, sensory hyperinnervation, and vascularization have been considered as the reasons for the progression of intervertebral disc degeneration. The current treatment approaches include conservative therapy and surgery, both of which have drawbacks. Novel stimuli-responsive delivery systems are more promising future therapeutic options than traditional treatments. By combining bioactive agents with specially designed hydrogels, scaffolds, microspheres, and nanoparticles, novel stimuli-responsive delivery systems can realize the targeted and sustained release of drugs, which can both reduce systematic adverse effects and maximize therapeutic efficacy. Trigger factors are categorized into internal (pH, reactive oxygen species, enzymes, etc.) and external stimuli (photo, ultrasound, magnetic, etc.) based on their intrinsic properties. This review systematically summarizes novel stimuli-responsive delivery systems for intervertebral disc degeneration, shedding new light on intervertebral disc therapy.

Imaging of Discogenic and Vertebrogenic Pain

Chronic low back pain is a major source of pain and disability globally involving multifactorial causes. Historically, intervertebral disc degeneration and disruption have been associated as primary back pain triggers of the anterior column, termed "discogenic pain." Recently, the vertebral endplates have been identified as another possible pain trigger of the anterior column. This "endplate-driven" model, defined "vertebrogenic pain," is often interconnected with disc degeneration. Diagnosis of vertebrogenic and discogenic pain relies on imaging techniques that isolate pain generators and exclude comorbid conditions. Traditional methods, like radiographs and discography, are augmented by more sensitive methods, including SPECT, CT, and MRI. Morphologic MRI is pivotal in revealing indicators of vertebrogenic (eg, Modic endplate changes) and discogenic pain (eg, disc degeneration and annular fissures). More advanced methods, like ultra-short-echo time imaging, and quantitative MRI further amplify MRI's accuracy in the detection of painful endplate and disc pathology. This review explores the pathophysiology of vertebrogenic and discogenic pain as well as the impact of different imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low back pain. We hope this information can help identify patients who may benefit from personalized clinical treatment and image-guided therapies.

An Engineered Bionic Nanoparticle Sponge as a Cytokine Trap and Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenger to Relieve Disc Degeneration and Discogenic Pain

The progressive worsening of disc degeneration and related nonspecific back pain are prominent clinical issues that cause a tremendous economic burden. Activation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) related inflammation is a primary pathophysiologic change in degenerative disc lesions. This pathological state is associated with M1 macrophages, apoptosis of nucleus pulposus cells (NPC), and the ingrowth of pain-related sensory nerves. To address the pathological issues of disc degeneration and discogenic pain, we developed MnO2@TMNP, a nanomaterial that encapsulated MnO2 nanoparticles with a TrkA-overexpressed macrophage cell membrane (TMNP). Consequently, this engineered nanomaterial showed high efficiency in binding various inflammatory factors and nerve growth factors, which inhibited inflammation-induced NPC apoptosis, matrix degradation, and nerve ingrowth. Furthermore, the macrophage cell membrane provided specific targeting to macrophages for the delivery of MnO2 nanoparticles. MnO2 nanoparticles in macrophages effectively scavenged intracellular ROS and prevented M1 polarization. Supportively, we found that MnO2@TMNP prevented disc inflammation and promoted matrix regeneration, leading to downregulated disc degenerative grades in the rat injured disc model. Both mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia were alleviated by MnO2@TMNP, which was attributed to the reduced calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P expression in the dorsal root ganglion and the downregulated Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) and Fos Proto-Oncogene (c-FOS) signaling in the spinal cord. We confirmed that the MnO2@TMNP nanomaterial alleviated the inflammatory immune microenvironment of intervertebral discs and the progression of disc degeneration, resulting in relieved discogenic pain.

Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation as Compared With L2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Pain Relief for Nonoperated Discogenic Low Back Pain: Analysis of Two Prospective Studies

INTRODUCTION

Chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP) is caused by degenerated disks marked by neural and vascular ingrowth. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to be effective for pain relief in patients who are not responsive to conventional treatments. Previously, the pain-relieving effect of two variations of SCS has been evaluated in CD-LBP: Burst SCS and L2 dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS). The aim of this study is to compare the effectivity in pain relief and pain experience of Burst SCS with that of conventional L2 DRGS in patients with CD-LBP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were implanted with either Burst SCS (n = 14) or L2 DRGS with conventional stimulation (n = 15). Patients completed the numeric pain rating score (NRS) for back pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) and EuroQoL 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires at baseline, and at three, six, and 12 months after implantation. Data were compared between time points and between groups.

RESULTS

Both Burst SCS and L2 DRGS significantly decreased NRS, ODI, and EQ-5D scores as compared with baseline. L2 DRGS resulted in significantly lower NRS scores at 12 months and significantly increased EQ-5D scores at six and 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Both L2 DRGS and Burst SCS resulted in reduction of pain and disability, and increased quality of life in patients with CD-LBP. L2 DRGS provided significantly increased pain relief and improvement in quality of life when compared with Burst SCS.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The clinical trial registration numbers for the study are NCT03958604 and NL54405.091.15.

[Physiotherapy in rehabilitation of patients with degenerative disk diseases from positions of evidence-based medicine: a literature review]

Back pain is one of the most urgent problems of rehabilitation. Patients with this pathology have a leading place among neurological patients in terms of the number of days of disability. The high economic costs in society are explained by the need for lumbar surgery (discectomy, spinal fusion and disc prosthesis) and rehabilitation after it. The effectiveness of rehabilitative measures is determined both by the patient's rehabilitative potential and by the choice of rehabilitative methods.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with degenerative disk diseases from positions of evidence-based medicine according to the scientific and technical literature.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The analysis of scientific and technical literature sources and the study of materials of meta-analyses, systematic reviews (depth of search was 20 years) on the evaluation of effectiveness of physiotherapeutical methods in the rehabilitation of patients with degenerative disk diseases have been conducted.

RESULTS

The ability of pulsed magnetic field to reduce the intensity of pain and improve the functional capacities of the spine in patients with low back pain has been identified. There was a pronounced analgesic end-point of low-level laser therapy in acute and chronic back pain at short and medium-term (up to 12 months) observation, as well as the ability of the method to reduce temporary disability in degenerative disk diseases.

CONCLUSION

The use of magnetotherapy and low-level laser therapy can be recommended for the treatment of patients with degenerative disk diseases (C grade of recommendations, 3rd level of evidence). The recommendation is based on the results of 10 RCTs (1.111 patients with degenerative disk diseases), 3 meta-analyses, 1 systematic review and 1 Cochrane review (a total of 3.431 patients).

Pain Experience and Sensory Changes in Astronauts During and After Short-Lasting Commercial Spaceflight: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Space travel has been associated with musculoskeletal pain, yet little is known about the nociceptive changes and pain experience during spaceflight. This preliminary study aims to investigate the pain experience and sensory alterations in astronauts following a 17-day mission to the International Space Station (ISS) on Axiom Space's AX-1 commercial space flight. Two participants were enrolled, and data were collected pre-flight, in-flight, post-flight, and three-month post-flight. Validated pain questionnaires assessed anxiety, catastrophizing, impact on physical and mental health, disability, and overall pain experience. Qualitative interviews were conducted post-landing and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and quantitative sensory testing (QST) were performed. Both astronauts reported musculoskeletal pain during and after the flight, which was managed with anti-inflammatories and stretching techniques. Pain levels returned to baseline after three months. Pain questionnaires revealed heightened pain experiences in-flight and immediately post-flight, although their adequacy in assessing pain in space is uncertain. Qualitative interviews allowed astronauts to describe their pain experiences during the flight. Sensory changes included increased mechanical touch detection thresholds, temporal pain summation, heat pain thresholds, and differences in conditioned pain modulation post-flight. This preliminary study suggested that spaceflight may affect various aspects of sensory perception and regulation in astronauts, albeit in a variable manner. More data are needed to gain insight of on gain and loss of sensory functions during space missions. Further investigation into the multifactorial stressors affecting the somatosensory system during space travel could contribute to advancements in space and pain medicine.

Myofascial and discogenic origins of lumbar pain: A critical review

The purpose of this three-part narrative review is to examine the anatomy of, and the research which supports, either the lumbar myofascia or intervertebral disc (IVD) as principal sources of our patient's low back pain. A comprehensive understanding of anatomical lumbar pain generators in combination with the current treatment-based classification system will further improve and enhance clinical decision-making skills. Section I reviews the anatomy of the spinal myofascia, myofascial sources of lumbar pain, and imaging of myofascial tissues. Part II reviews the anatomy of the IVD, examines the IVD as a potential lumbar pain generator, and includes detailed discussion on Nerve Growth Factor, Inflammatory Cytokines, Vertebral End Plates and Modic change, Annular tears, and Discogenic instability. Part III looks at the history of myofascial pain, lab-based research and myofascial pain, and various levels of discogenic pain provocation research including animal, laboratory and human subjects. Our review concludes with author recommendations on developing a comprehensive understanding of altered stress concentrations affecting the posterior annulus fibrosis, neo-innervation of the IVD, inflammatory cytokines, discogenic instability, and how this knowledge can complement use of the Treatment-Based Classification System.

Ultrasound-guided disc pain induction test for diagnosis of discogenic lumbar pain: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Several methods can be used to diagnose discogenic pain, but only discoblock can diagnose discogenic pain definitively. This study aimed to examine the usefulness of an ultrasound-guided disc pain induction test for a simple and accurate diagnosis of the culprit lesion.

METHODS

We included 41 patients with lumbar pain in whom pain was induced by an ultrasound-guided disc pain induction test. All patients had confirmed pain at L1/2 to L5/S1 based on an ultrasound-guided disc pain induction test and underwent X-ray photography and magnetic resonance imaging. Seventeen patients who required injection due to severe pain underwent discoblock procedures for discs with the most intense pain, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were obtained before and after the procedure for these patients. We analysed the association between painful discs and radiological findings.

RESULTS

Pain induction was noted in a total of 65 discs, and the pain was induced in 23 patients in only one disc. All patients had disc degeneration of Pfirrmann classification grade 1 or higher, with more significant disc degeneration in painful discs than in painless discs. There was no significant relationship between the presence or absence of pain and Modic type. The average VAS measurements improved significantly from 9.5 (pre-procedure) to 2.5 (post-procedure). These results suggest that the most painful discs were the causes of discogenic lumbar pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Our ultrasound-guided disc pain induction test may help diagnose disc degeneration and identify culprit lesions, even when multiple discs exhibit findings of degeneration.

Updates on Pathophysiology of Discogenic Back Pain

Discogenic back pain, a subset of chronic back pain, is caused by intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration, and imparts a notable socioeconomic health burden on the population. However, degeneration by itself does not necessarily imply discogenic pain. In this review, we highlight the existing literature on the pathophysiology of discogenic back pain, focusing on the biomechanical and biochemical steps that lead to pain in the setting of IVD degeneration. Though the pathophysiology is incompletely characterized, the current evidence favors a framework where degeneration leads to IVD inflammation, and subsequent immune milieu recruitment. Chronic inflammation serves as a basis of penetrating neovascularization and neoinnervation into the IVD. Hence, nociceptive sensitization emerges, which manifests as discogenic back pain. Recent studies also highlight the complimentary roles of low virulence infections and central nervous system (CNS) metabolic state alteration. Targeted therapies that seek to disrupt inflammation, angiogenesis, and neurogenic pathways are being investigated. Regenerative therapy in the form of gene therapy and cell-based therapy are also being explored.

Automated segmentation and prediction of intervertebral disc morphology and uniaxial deformations from MRI

Objective

The measurement of in vivo intervertebral disc (IVD) mechanics may be used to understand the etiology of IVD degeneration and low back pain (LBP). To this end, our lab has developed methods to measure IVD morphology and uniaxial compressive deformation (% change in IVD height) resulting from dynamic activity, in vivo, using magnetic resonance images (MRI). However, due to the time-intensive nature of manual image segmentation, we sought to validate an image segmentation algorithm that could accurately and reliably reproduce models of in vivo tissue mechanics.

Design

Therefore, we developed and evaluated two commonly employed deep learning architectures (2D and 3D U-Net) for the segmentation of IVDs from MRI. The performance of these models was evaluated for morphological accuracy by comparing predicted IVD segmentations (Dice similarity coefficient, mDSC; average surface distance, ASD) to manual (ground truth) measures. Likewise, functional reliability and precision were assessed by evaluating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SE_m) of predicted and manually derived deformation measures.

Results

Peak model performance was obtained using the 3D U-net architecture, yielding a maximum mDSC ​= ​0.9824 and component-wise ASD_x ​= ​0.0683 ​mm; ASD_y ​= ​0.0335 ​mm; ASD_z ​= ​0.0329 ​mm. Functional model performance demonstrated excellent reliability ICC ​= ​0.926 and precision SE_m ​= ​0.42%.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that a deep learning framework can precisely and reliably automate measures of IVD function, drastically improving the throughput of these time-intensive methods.

Defining the Patient with Lumbar Discogenic Pain: Real-World Implications for Diagnosis and Effective Clinical Management

There is an enormous body of literature that has identified the intervertebral disc as a potent pain generator. However, with regard to lumbar degenerative disc disease, the specific diagnostic criteria lack clarity and fail to capture the primary components which include axial midline low back pain with or without non-radicular/non-sciatic referred leg pain in a sclerotomal distribution. In fact, there is no specific ICD-10-CM diagnostic code to classify and define discogenic pain as a unique source of pain distinct from other recognized sources of chronic low back pain including facetogenic, neurocompressive including herniation and/or stenosis, sacroiliac, vertebrogenic, and psychogenic. All of these other sources have well-defined ICD-10-CM codes. Corresponding codes for discogenic pain remain absent from the diagnostic coding vernacular. The International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS) has proposed a modernization of ICD-10-CM codes to specifically define pain associated with lumbar and lumbosacral degenerative disc disease. The proposed codes would also allow the pain to be characterized by location: lumbar region only, leg only, or both. Successful implementation of these codes would benefit both physicians and payers in distinguishing, tracking, and improving algorithms and treatments for discogenic pain associated with intervertebral disc degeneration.

Sensory innervation of the lumbar 5/6 intervertebral disk in mice

Introduction

Over the years, most back pain-related biological studies focused on the pathogenesis of disk degeneration. It is known that nerve distributions at the outer layer of the annulus fibrosus (AF) may be an important contributor to back pain symptoms. However, the types and origins of sensory nerve terminals in the mouse lumbar disks have not been widely studied. Using disk microinjection and nerve retrograde tracing methods, the current study aimed to characterize the nerve types and neuropathway of the lumbar 5/6 (L5/6) disk in mice.

Methods

Using an anterior peritoneal approach, the L5/6 disk of adult C57BL/6 mice (males, 8–12 weeks) disk microinjection was performed. Fluorogold (FG) was injected into the L5/6 disk using the Hamilton syringe with a homemade glass needle driven by a pressure microinjector. The lumbar spine and bilateral thoracic 13 (Th13) to L6 DRGs were harvested at 10 days after injection. The number of FG+ neurons among different levels was counted and analyzed. Different nerve markers, including anti-neurofilament 160/200 (NF160/200), anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), anti-parvalbumin (PV), and anti-tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), were used to identify different types of nerve terminals in AF and their origins in DRG neurons.

Results

There were at least three types of nerve terminals at the outer layer of L5/6 AF in mice, including NF160/200+ (indicating Aβ fibers), CGRP+ (Aδ and C fibers), and PV+ (proprioceptive fibers). No TH+ fibers (sympathetic nerve fibers and some C-low threshold mechanoreceptors) were noticed in either. Using retrograde tracing methods, we found that nerve terminals in the L5/6 disk were multi-segmentally from Th13-L6 DRGs, with L1 and L5 predominately. An immunofluorescence analysis revealed that FG+ neurons in DRGs were co-localized with NF160/200, CGRP, and PV, but not TH.

Conclusion

Intervertebral disks were innervated by multiple types of nerve fibers in mice, including Aβ, Aδ, C, and proprioceptive fibers. No sympathetic nerve fibers were found in AF. The nerve network of the L5/6 disk in mice was multi-segmentally innervated by the Th13-L6 DRGs (mainly L1 and L5 DRGs). Our results may serve as a reference for preclinical studies of discogenic pain in mice.

Intervertebral disc degeneration and osteoarthritis: a common molecular disease spectrum

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) and osteoarthritis (OA) affecting the facet joint of the spine are biomechanically interdependent, typically occur in tandem, and have considerable epidemiological and pathophysiological overlap. Historically, the distinctions between these degenerative diseases have been emphasized. Therefore, research in the two fields often occurs independently without adequate consideration of the co-dependence of the two sites, which reside within the same functional spinal unit. Emerging evidence from animal models of spine degeneration highlight the interdependence of IDD and facet joint OA, warranting a review of the parallels between these two degenerative phenomena for the benefit of both clinicians and research scientists. This Review discusses the pathophysiological aspects of IDD and OA, with an emphasis on tissue, cellular and molecular pathways of degeneration. Although the intervertebral disc and synovial facet joint are biologically distinct structures that are amenable to reductive scientific consideration, substantial overlap exists between the molecular pathways and processes of degeneration (including cartilage destruction, extracellular matrix degeneration and osteophyte formation) that occur at these sites. Thus, researchers, clinicians, advocates and policy-makers should consider viewing the burden and management of spinal degeneration holistically as part of the OA disease continuum.

A prospective study of BurstDR™ spinal cord stimulation for non-operated discogenic low back pain

INTRODUCTION

Chronic discogenic low back pain (CD-LBP) is caused by degeneration of the disc due to trauma to the annulus or by unprovoked degeneration, resulting in chronic pain. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) employing the BurstDR™ waveform has been shown to be an effective treatment in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The aim of this prospective case study was to determine the effect of BurstDR™ SCS on pain relief, disability, and patient satisfaction in a population with CD-LBP.

METHODS

Seventeen subjects with CD-LBP received a SCS trial with BurstDR™ stimulation. Patients with >50% pain relief after a trial period of 2 weeks were permanently implanted (n = 15). Patients then rated LBP and leg pain using the numeric rating scale (NRS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC), EQ-5D quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain at baseline following trial, 3, 6, and 12 months after permanent implantation.

RESULTS

Treatment with BurstDR™ SCS resulted in significant reduction of LBP as the NRS was reduced from 71.7 ± 7.3 at baseline to 42.5 ± 18.1 at 12 months. Average pain relief at 12 months was 42.5%. In patients with leg pain (n = 8), pain was significantly reduced from 66.9 ± 8.2 to 11.7 ± 10.4 at 12 months. PainDETECT scores for neuropathic pain significantly reduced from 18.9 ± 4.8 at baseline, and 14.8 ± 3.2 at 12 months. Baseline ODI score significantly reduced from 41.2 ± 12.8 to 25.8 ± 8.6 at 12 months. PGIC scores remained low from 2.6 ± 1.6 at 3 months, 2.5 ± 1.0 at 6 months, and 2.5 ± 1.3 at 12 months. EQ-5D-5L rates remained constant from baseline 56.10 ± 23.9 to 68.6 ± 12.9 at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

BurstDR™ SCS resulted in significant reduction of back pain, leg pain, and quality of life in patients with CD-LBP and decreased the level of disability and generated positive patient satisfaction scores.

In vivo intervertebral disc mechanical deformation following a treadmill walking "stress test" is inversely related to T1rho relaxation time

OBJECTIVE

To assess the in vivo relationship between the mechanical response of intervertebral discs (IVDs) to dynamic activity and IVD biochemical composition assessed via T1rho relaxation imaging.

DESIGN

Eighteen asymptomatic participants with no history of low back pain (LBP), injury, or surgery underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of their lumbar spine prior to and immediately following a treadmill walking "stress test." Anatomic (SPACE, FLASH) MR images were obtained pre- and post-exercise and utilized to measure IVD mechanical deformation. Quantitative (T1rho) imaging was performed pre-exercise to reflect IVD composition. Pre-exercise anatomic images were also utilized to assess IVD degenerative status based on the modified Pfirrmann scale. To quantify mechanical response, 3D surface models of the L1-L2-L5-S1 IVDs were created from manual segmentations of pre- and post-exercise anatomic images and utilized to assess changes in IVD height. IVD strain (%) was defined as change in IVD height normalized to pre-activity height. Linear mixed models were used to assess the relationships between IVD mechanical deformation (strain), composition (T1rho relaxation time), and degenerative status (Pfirrmann grade).

RESULTS

Increased compressive IVD strain was associated with lower T1rho relaxation times in the nucleus pulposus (NP) of the disc (βT1rho=5.07,CI:[1.52,7.77],Rmarg2=0.52,p=0.005). Thus, an inverse relationship between IVD strain and NP T1rho relaxation time was observed.

CONCLUSION

The in vivo mechanical response of the IVD to the "stress test" was sensitive to differences in NP composition. The results of this study suggest that quantification of in vivo IVD mechanical function and composition may provide insight into IVD health.

Netrin-1 mediates nerve innervation and angiogenesis leading to discogenic pain

Objective

Discogenic low back pain (LBP) is associated with nociceptive nerve fibers that grow into degenerated intervertebral discs (IVD) but the etiopathogenesis of disease is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of Netrin-1 in causing discogenic LBP.

Methods

The level of nociceptive nerve innervation was examined in disc degenerative patients and rat needle-punctured models by immunohistochemistry. Nucleus pulposus (NP) cells were isolated from IVD tissues of rats and induced degeneration by interleukin-1β (IL-1β) or tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα). The candidate genes related to neuron outgrowth and migration were selected by Next-generation sequencing (NGS). CRISPR/Cas9 was used to knockdown Netrin-1 in NP cells. The impact of Netrin-1 on nerve innervation were evaluated with P2X2、NF200 staining and microfluidics assay. Meanwhile the CD31 staining and transwell assay were used to evaluate the impact of Netrin-1 in angiogenesis. The proteins and RNA extracted from NP cells related to catabolism and anabolism were examined by western blot assay and RT-qPCR experiment. ChIP and luciferase experiments were used to assess the intracellular transcriptional regulation of Netrin-1. Further, a needle-punctured rat model followed by histomorphometry and immunofluorescence histochemistry was used to explore the potential effect of Netrin-1 on LBP in vivo.

Results

The level of nerve innervation was increased in severe disc degenerative patients while the expression of Netrin-1 was upregulated. The supernatants of NP cells stimulated with IL-1β or TNFα containing more Netrin-1 could promote axon growth and vascular endothelial cells migration. Knocking down Netrin-1 or overexpressing transcription factor TCF3 as a negative regulator of Netrin-1 attenuated this effect. The needle-punctured rat model brought significant spinal hypersensitivity, nerve innervation and angiogenesis, nevertheless knocking down Netrin-1 effectively prevented disc degeneration-induced adverse impacts.

Conclusion

Discogenic LBP was induced by Netrin-1, which mediated nerve innervation and angiogenesis in disc degeneration. Knocking down Netrin-1 by CRISPR/Cas9 or negatively regulating Netrin1 by transcription factor TCF3 could alleviate spinal hypersensitivity.

The translational potential of this article

This study on Netrin-1 could provide a new target and theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment for discogenic back pain.

Discogenic Low Back Pain: Anatomy, Pathophysiology and Treatments of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a major contributing factor for discogenic low back pain (LBP), causing a significant global disability. The IVD consists of an inner core proteoglycan-rich nucleus pulposus (NP) and outer lamellae collagen-rich annulus fibrosus (AF) and is confined by a cartilage end plate (CEP), providing structural support and shock absorption against mechanical loads. Changes to degenerative cascades in the IVD cause dysfunction and instability in the lumbar spine. Various treatments include pharmacological, rehabilitation or surgical interventions that aim to relieve pain; however, these modalities do not halt the pathologic events of disc degeneration or promote tissue regeneration. Loss of stem and progenitor markers, imbalance of the extracellular matrix (ECM), increase of inflammation, sensory hyperinnervation and vascularization, and associated signaling pathways have been identified as the onset and progression of disc degeneration. To better understand the pain originating from IVD, our review focuses on the anatomy of IVD and the pathophysiology of disc degeneration that contribute to the development of discogenic pain. We highlight the key mechanisms and associated signaling pathways underlying disc degeneration causing discogenic back pain, current clinical treatments, clinical perspective and directions of future therapies. Our review comprehensively provides a better understanding of healthy IVD and degenerative events of the IVD associated with discogenic pain, which helps to model painful disc degeneration as a therapeutic platform and to identify signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for the future treatment of discogenic pain.

Neuropeptide Y and receptors are associated with the pyroptosis of nucleus pulposus in aging and degenerative intervertebral discs of rats

The neuropeptide Y(NPY) mediates bone metabolism and the degradation of cartilage in the peripheral nervous system. However, its role in the intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is less clear and warrant further study. The process of IDD has always been accompanied by inflammatory response and pyroptosis of nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between NPY, Y1R, Y2R and pyroptosis in aging and degenerative discs and the direct effect of NPY on NPCs. First, we have assessed NPY, Y1R, Y2R and the expression of pyroptosis related protein in the immature (6 weeks), mature (16 weeks), aged (54 weeks), and degenerated discs. As part of our studies, we also have evaluated pyroptotic changes in the NPCs, induced by exposure to NPY. Our results suggested that compared with natural aging discs, the degenerative discs showed the high expression of NPY, Y1R and Y2R. Correlation analysis showed that the level of NPY and Y1R in degenerative discs were positively correlated with GSDMD, whereas there was no significant correlation between Y2R and GSDMD. In vitro, NPY treatment stimulated the activation of caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis of NPCs. However, Y1R antagonist inhibited NPY-induced pyroptosis of NPCs. Western blot confirmed that Y1R antagonist decreased the level of cleaved.GSDMD and caspase-1 in NPCs. In conclusion, our results indicated that compared with natural aging discs, the degenerated discs showed the high expression of NPY, Y1R and Y2R. NPY-Y1R involve the IDD development by the regulation of pyroptosis in the NPCs. Regulating the function of NPY may be a promising strategy for IDD treatment.

Intervertebral disc degeneration and how it leads to low back pain

The purpose of this review was to evaluate data generated by animal models of intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration published in the last decade and show how this has made invaluable contributions to the identification of molecular events occurring in and contributing to pain generation. IVD degeneration and associated spinal pain is a complex multifactorial process, its complexity poses difficulties in the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic target to focus on of many potential candidates in the formulation of strategies to alleviate pain perception and to effect disc repair and regeneration and the prevention of associated neuropathic and nociceptive pain. Nerve ingrowth and increased numbers of nociceptors and mechanoreceptors in the degenerate IVD are mechanically stimulated in the biomechanically incompetent abnormally loaded degenerate IVD leading to increased generation of low back pain. Maintenance of a healthy IVD is, thus, an important preventative measure that warrants further investigation to preclude the generation of low back pain. Recent studies with growth and differentiation factor 6 in IVD puncture and multi-level IVD degeneration models and a rat xenograft radiculopathy pain model have shown it has considerable potential in the prevention of further deterioration in degenerate IVDs, has regenerative properties that promote recovery of normal IVD architectural functional organization and inhibits the generation of inflammatory mediators that lead to disc degeneration and the generation of low back pain. Human clinical trials are warranted and eagerly anticipated with this compound to assess its efficacy in the treatment of IVD degeneration and the prevention of the generation of low back pain.

Intradiscal injection of human recombinant BMP-4 does not reverse intervertebral disc degeneration induced by nuclectomy in sheep

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The Translational Potential of This Article

The role of nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in regulating intervertebral disc degeneration

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) has been the major contributor to chronic lower back pain (LBP). Abnormal apoptosis, senescence, and pyroptosis of IVD cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, and infiltration of immune cells are the major molecular alternations during IVDD. Changes at tissue level frequently occur at advanced IVD tissue. Ectopic ingrowth of nerves within inner annulus fibrosus (AF) and nucleus pulposus (NP) tissue has been considered as the primary cause for LBP. Innervation at IVD tissue mainly included sensory and sympathetic nerves, and many markers for these two types of nerves have been detected since 1940. In fact, in osteoarthritis (OA), beyond pain transmission, the direct regulation of neuropeptides on functions of chondrocytes have attracted researchers' great attention recently. Many physical and pathological similarities between joint and IVD have shed us the light on the neurogenic mechanism involved in IVDD. Here, an overview of the advances in the nervous system within IVD tissue will be performed, with a discussion on in the role of nerve fibers and their neurotransmitters in regulating IVDD. We hope this review can attract more research interest to address neuromodulation and IVDD itself, which will enhance our understanding of the contribution of neuromodulation to the structural changes within IVD tissue and inflammatory responses and will help identify novel therapeutic targets and enable the effective treatment of IVDD disease.

Engineered Human Intervertebral Disc Model Inducing Degenerative Microglial Proinflammation

Degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD) is a major contributor to low back pain (LBP). IVD degeneration is characterized by abnormal production of inflammatory cytokines secreted by IVD cells. Although the underlying molecular mechanisms of LBP have not been elucidated, increasing evidence suggests that LBP is associated particularly with microglia in IVD tissues and the peridiscal space, aggravating the cascade of degenerative events. In this study, we implemented our microfluidic chemotaxis platform to investigate microglial inflammation in response to our reconstituted degenerative IVD models. The IVD models were constructed by stimulating human nucleus pulposus (NP) cells with interleukin-1β and producing interleukin-6 (129.93 folds), interleukin-8 (18.31 folds), C-C motif chemokine ligand-2 (CCL-2) (6.12 folds), and CCL-5 (5.68 folds). We measured microglial chemotaxis (p < 0.05) toward the conditioned media of the IVD models. In addition, we observed considerable activation of neurodegenerative and deactivation of protective microglia via upregulated expression of CD11b (p < 0.001) and down-regulation of CD206 protein (p < 0.001) by soluble factors from IVD models. This, in turn, enhances the inflammatory milieu in IVD tissues, causing matrix degradation and cellular damage. Our findings indicate that degenerative IVD may induce degenerative microglial proinflammation, leading to LBP development.

Sensory Nerve Maintains Intervertebral Disc Extracellular Matrix Homeostasis Via CGRP/CHSY1 Axis

Sensory nerves are long being recognized as collecting units of various outer stimuli; recent advances indicate that the sensory nerve also plays pivotal roles in maintaining organ homeostasis. Here, this study shows that sensory nerve orchestrates intervertebral disc (IVD) homeostasis by regulating its extracellular matrix (ECM) metabolism. Specifically, genetical sensory denervation of IVD results in loss of IVD water preserve molecule chondroitin sulfate (CS), the reduction of CS bio-synthesis gene chondroitin sulfate synthase 1 (CHSY1) expression, and dysregulated ECM homeostasis of IVD. Particularly, knockdown of sensory neuros calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) expression induces similar ECM metabolic disorder compared to sensory nerve denervation model, and this effect is abolished in CHSY1 knockout mice. Furthermore, in vitro evidence shows that CGRP regulates nucleus pulposus cell CHSY1 expression and CS synthesis via CGRP receptor component receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) and cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) signaling. Therapeutically, local injection of forskolin significantly attenuates IVD degeneration progression in mouse annulus fibrosus puncture model. Overall, these results indicate that sensory nerve maintains IVD ECM homeostasis via CGRP/CHSY1 axis and promotes IVD repair, and this expands the understanding concerning how IVD links to sensory nerve system, thus shedding light on future development of novel therapeutical strategy to IVD degeneration.

The involvement of immune system in intervertebral disc herniation and degeneration

Intervertebral disc (IVD) herniation and degeneration contributes significantly to low back pain (LBP), of which the molecular pathogenesis is not fully understood. Disc herniation may cause LBP and radicular pain, but not all LBP patients have disc herniation. Degenerated discs could be the source of pain, but not all degenerated discs are symptomatic. We previously found that disc degeneration and herniation accompanied by inflammation. We further found that anti‐inflammatory molecules blocked immune responses, alleviated IVD degeneration and pain. Based on our recent findings and the work of others, we hypothesize that immune system may play a prominent role in the production of disc herniation or disc degeneration associated pain. While the nucleus pulposus (NP) is an immune‐privileged organ, the damage of the physical barrier between NP and systemic circulation, or the innervation and vascularization of the degenerated NP, on one hand exposes NP as a foreign antigen to immune system, and on the other hand presents compression on the nerve root or dorsal root ganglion (DRG), which both elicit immune responses induced by immune cells and their mediators. The inflammation can remain for a long time at remote distance, with various types of cytokines and immune cells involved in this pain‐inducing process. In this review, we aim to revisit the autoimmunity of the NP, immune cell infiltration after break of physical barrier, the inflammatory activities in the DRG and the generation of pain. We also summarize the involvement of immune system, including immune cells and cytokines, in degenerated or herniated IVDs and affected DRG.

CGRP Regulates Nucleus Pulposus Cell Apoptosis and Inflammation via the MAPK/NF-κB Signaling Pathways during Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) has been proved to be the dominating cause of disability in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Of the various etiological factors, intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) has been the dominating cause. In the past few decades, the role and changes of nerve systems, especially the peripheral sensory fibers and their neurotransmitters, in the induction and progression of IVDD have attracted growing concerns. The expression of many neuropeptides, such as SP, NPY, and CGRP, in the nociceptive pathways is increased during the progression of IVDD and responsible for the discogenic pain. Here, the role of CGRP in the progression of IVDD was firstly investigated both in vitro and in vivo. Firstly, we confirmed that human degenerated intervertebral disc tissue exhibited elevated expression of CGRP and its receptor. Secondly, in vitro experiments suggested that CGRP could inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis in human nucleus pulposus (NP) cells, as well as promote inflammation and degenerated phenotypes through activating NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. Thirdly, CGRP receptor antagonist, Rimegepant, can ameliorate the adverse effects of CGRP imposed on NP cells, which were confirmed in vitro and in vivo. Our results will bring about a brand-new insight into the roles of neuromodulation in IVDD and related therapeutic attempts.

Stem Cell Therapy and Exercise for Treatment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

As part of the motor system, intervertebral disc (IVD) is a complicated tissue with multiple components. The degeneration of IVD may result in low back pain (LBP), which strongly impairs quality of life. Various causes are related to the degeneration of IVD, including cell senescence, hydration lost, and inflammation. Stem cells founded in different tissues have attracted the interest of the researchers and clinicians to study the implication of these cells in the treatment for tissue injury and degeneration. In this report, we will review the study of stem cells in the treatment for IVD degeneration. On the other hand, the effect of exercise on IVD degeneration and the relationship between IVD degeneration and musculoskeletal disorders like sarcopenia are discussed.

Proper animal experimental designs for preclinical research of biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration

Low back pain is a vital musculoskeletal disease that impairs life quality, leads to disability and imposes heavy economic burden on the society, while it is greatly attributed to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). However, the existing treatments, such as medicines, chiropractic adjustments and surgery, cannot achieve ideal disc regeneration. Therefore, advanced bioactive therapies are implemented, including stem cells delivery, bioreagents administration, and implantation of biomaterials etc. Among these researches, few reported unsatisfying regenerative outcomes. However, these advanced therapies have barely achieved successful clinical translation. The main reason for the inconsistency between satisfying preclinical results and poor clinical translation may largely rely on the animal models that cannot actually simulate the human disc degeneration. The inappropriate animal model also leads to difficulties in comparing the efficacies among biomaterials in different reaches. Therefore, animal models that better simulate the clinical charateristics of human IDD should be acknowledged. In addition, in vivo regenerative outcomes should be carefully evaluated to obtain robust results. Nevertheless, many researches neglect certain critical characteristics, such as adhesive properties for biomaterials blocking annulus fibrosus defects and hyperalgesia that is closely related to the clinical manifestations, e.g., low back pain. Herein, in this review, we summarized the animal models established for IDD, and highlighted the proper models and parameters that may result in acknowledged IDD models. Then, we discussed the existing biomaterials for disc regeneration and the characteristics that should be considered for regenerating different parts of discs. Finally, well-established assays and parameters for in vivo disc regeneration are explored.