1
|
Bernstein MH, Rosenfield MN, Blease C, Magill M, Terek RM, Savulescu J, Beaudoin FL, Rich JD, Wartolowska K. How do US orthopaedic surgeons view placebo-controlled surgical trials? A pilot online survey study. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024; 50:643-646. [PMID: 36175126 PMCID: PMC10050223 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Randomised placebo-controlled trials (RPCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating novel treatments. However, this design is rarely used in the context of orthopaedic interventions where participants are assigned to a real or placebo surgery. The present study examines attitudes towards RPCTs for orthopaedic surgery among 687 orthopaedic surgeons across the USA. When presented with a vignette describing an RPCT for orthopaedic surgery, 52.3% of participants viewed it as 'completely' or 'mostly' unethical. Participants were also asked to rank-order the value of five different types of evidence supporting the efficacy of a surgery, ranging from RPCT to an anecdotal report. Responses regarding RPCTs were polarised with 26.4% viewing it as the least valuable (even less valuable than an anecdote) and 35.7 .% viewing it as the most valuable. Where equipoise exists, if we want to subject orthopaedic surgeries to the highest standard of evidence (RPCTs) before they are implemented in clinical practice, it will be necessary to educate physicians on the value and ethics of placebo surgery control conditions. Otherwise, invasive procedures may be performed without any benefits beyond possible placebo effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H Bernstein
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Center for Alcohol & Addiction Studies, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Maayan N Rosenfield
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Center for Alcohol & Addiction Studies, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Charlotte Blease
- General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Molly Magill
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Center for Alcohol & Addiction Studies, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Richard M Terek
- Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Julian Savulescu
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Francesca L Beaudoin
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Josiah D Rich
- Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jütte R. Involving Voters and Consumers in Decision-Making about the Health Care System - The Swiss Case: A Review. Complement Med Res 2023; 31:78-83. [PMID: 37748443 DOI: 10.1159/000534268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behind the principle of involving users and voters directly in decision-making about the health care system are ideas relating to empowerment. This implies a challenge to the traditional view that scientific knowledge is generally believed to be of higher value than empirical knowledge, as it is the case with CAM. The objectives of this review are (a) to show that this assumption disregards the fact that CAM is as scientific as conventional medicine but has different basic assumptions what the world is being made of and consequently uses different/adapted scientific methods; (b) to demonstrate how a perspective of the history of medicine and science as well as direct democracy mechanisms such as stipulated in the Swiss constitution can be used to achieve the acceptance of CAM in a modern medical health care system. A public health care system financed by levies from the population should also reflect the widely documented desire in the population for medical pluralism (provided that therapeutical alternatives are not risky). Otherwise, the problem of social inequality arises because only people with a good financial background can afford this medicine. SUMMARY From the perspective of scientific theory and the history of science, the answer to the question of whether complementary medicine and conventional medical procedures must provide proof of efficacy according to a uniform scientific is quite controversial according to epistemologically oriented studies on this issue. KEY MESSAGES This review found strong evidence for involving voters and consumers directly in decision-making about the provision of CAM in the health care system. It also seems necessary to step back in the debate on evidence-based medicine, taking a history of medicine and science perspective, as the role which the proper method occupies and plays in medicine is defined by the scientific nature of the world view. Hinter dem Grundsatz, Nutzer und Wähler direkt in die Entscheidungsfindung über das Gesundheitssystem einzubeziehen, stehen Vorstellungen von Empowerment. Dies impliziert eine Infragestellung der traditionellen Ansicht, dass wissenschaftliches Wissen im Allgemeinen als wertvoller angesehen wird als empirisches Wissen und erprobte Erfahrung, wie es bei der Komplementärmedizin der Fall ist. Die Ziele dieser Übersichtsarbeit sind: (a) zu zeigen, dass diese Annahme die Tatsache außer Acht lässt, dass die Komplementärmedizin ebenso wissenschaftlich ist wie die Schulmedizin, aber von anderen Grundannahmen ausgeht, wie die Welt beschaffen ist, und folglich andere/angepasste wissenschaftliche Methoden anwendet; (b) aufzuzeigen, wie eine medizin- und wissenschaftsgeschichtliche Perspektive sowie Mechanismen der direkten Demokratie, wie sie in der Schweizer Verfassung vorgesehen sind, genutzt werden können, um die Akzeptanz der Komplementärmedizin in einem modernen medizinischen Gesundheitssystem zu erreichen. Ein öffentliches, durch Abgaben der Bevölkerung finanziertes Gesundheitssystem sollte auch dem vielfach dokumentierten Wunsch der Bevölkerung nach medizinischem Pluralismus Rechnung tragen (sofern die therapeutischen Alternativen nicht riskant sind). Andernfalls stellt sich das Problem der sozialen Ungleichheit, weil sich nur Menschen mit einem guten finanziellen Hintergrund diese Medizin leisten können.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Jütte
- Institute for the History of Medicine of the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Butler M, Jelen L, Rucker J. Expectancy in placebo-controlled trials of psychedelics: if so, so what? Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2022; 239:3047-3055. [PMID: 36063208 PMCID: PMC9481484 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-022-06221-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Modern psychedelic research remains in an early phase, and the eventual introduction of psychedelics into clinical practice remains in doubt. In this piece, we discuss the role of blinding and expectancy in psychedelic trials, and place this in a broader historical and contemporary context of blinding in trials across the rest of healthcare. We suggest that premature and uncritical promotion ('hype') of psychedelics as medicines is not only misleading, but also directly influences participant expectancy in ongoing psychedelic trials. We argue that although psychedelic trials are likely to significantly overestimate treatment effects by design due to unblinding and expectancy effects, this is not a unique situation. Placebo-controlled RCTs are not a perfect fit for all therapeutics, and problems in blinding should not automatically disqualify medications from licencing decisions. We suggest that simple practical measures may be (and indeed already are) taken in psychedelic trials to partially mitigate the effects of expectancy and unblinding, such as independent raters and active placebos. We briefly suggest other alternative trial methodologies which could be used to bolster RCT results, such as naturalistic studies. We conclude that the results of contemporary placebo-controlled RCTs of psychedelics should neither be dismissed due to imperfections in design, nor should early data be taken as firm evidence of effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matt Butler
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Luke Jelen
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James Rucker
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karjalainen T, Heikkinen J, Busija L, Jokihaara J, Lewin AM, Naylor JM, Harris L, Harris IA, Buchbinder R, Adie S. Use of Placebo and Nonoperative Control Groups in Surgical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2223903. [PMID: 35895060 PMCID: PMC9331086 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Nonspecific effects, particularly placebo effects, are thought to contribute significantly to the observed effect in surgical trials. OBJECTIVE To estimate the proportion of the observed effect of surgical treatment that is due to nonspecific effects (including the placebo effect). DATA SOURCES Published Cochrane reviews and updated, extended search of MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL until March 2019. STUDY SELECTION Published randomized placebo-controlled surgical trials and trials comparing the effect of the same surgical interventions with nonoperative controls (ie, no treatment, usual care, or exercise program). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Pairs of authors independently screened the search results, assessed full texts to identify eligible studies and the risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. The proportion of all nonspecific effects was calculated as the change in the placebo control divided by the change in the active surgery and pooled in a random-effect meta-analysis. To estimate the magnitude of the placebo effect, we pooled the difference in outcome between placebo and nonoperative controls and used metaregression to estimate the association between the type of control group and the treatment effect (difference between the groups), adjusting for risk of bias, sample size, and type of outcome. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Between- and within-group effect sizes expressed as Hedges g. RESULTS In this review, 100 trials were included comprising data from 62 trials with placebo controls (3 also included nonoperative controls), and 38 trials with nonoperative controls (32 interventions; 10 699 participants). Risk of bias across trials was comparable except for performance and detection bias, which was high in trials with nonoperative controls. The mean nonspecific effects accounted for 67% (95% CI, 61% to 73%) of the observed change after surgery; however, this varied widely between different procedures. The estimated surgical placebo effect had a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.13 (95% CI, -0.26 to 0.51). Trials with placebo and nonoperative controls found comparable treatment effects (SMD, -0.09 [95% CI, -0.35 to 0.18]; 15 interventions; 73 between-group effects; adjusted analysis: SMD, -0.11 [95% CI, -0.37 to 0.15]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this review, the change in health state after surgery was composed largely of nonspecific effects, but no evidence supported a large placebo effect. Placebo-controlled surgical trials may be redundant when trials with nonoperative controls consistently report no substantial association from surgery compared with nonoperative treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teemu Karjalainen
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Nova Central Finland, Jyvaskyla, Finland
- Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Malvern, Australia
| | - Juuso Heikkinen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Ljoudmila Busija
- Biostatistical Consulting Platform, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jarkko Jokihaara
- Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Adriane M. Lewin
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justine M. Naylor
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, Liverpool Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Laura Harris
- Sydney Orthopaedic Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian A. Harris
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachelle Buchbinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University
- Monash Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sam Adie
- St George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dunn M, Rushton AB, Mistry J, Soundy A, Heneghan NR. Which biopsychosocial factors are associated with the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain? Protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e053941. [PMID: 34635532 PMCID: PMC8506872 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent systematic reviews have identified many biopsychosocial factors associated with the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP). Despite often being specific to a particular musculoskeletal condition, findings are similar across systematic reviews. Research is needed to aggregate these findings to identify consistent factors across musculoskeletal disorders that are associated with the development of CMP. The objective of this study is to provide a meta-level synthesis of all biopsychosocial factors associated with the development of CMP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS An umbrella review and meta-level narrative synthesis±meta-analysis has been designed informed by Joanna Briggs Institute and Cochrane guidance. This protocol is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-P. Sources will include Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PsycINFO, CINAHL, PEDro, PROSPERO, Google Scholar and grey literature. INCLUSION CRITERIA any systematic review which investigates biopsychosocial factors which may be associated with the development of CMP through prospective longitudinal methods. The outcome is musculoskeletal pain lasting beyond 3 months. Two independent reviewers will be involved in all stages; screening, selection, data extraction and risk of bias evaluation using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 guidelines. A meta-level narrative synthesis will be conducted based on (a) factors associated with development of CMP, (b) the range of musculoskeletal disorders for which the same/similar findings have been established and (c) the quality of studies informing these findings. Where possible, meta-analysis will be performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines will be followed to determine the level of evidence for each biopsychosocial factor. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This umbrella review does not require ethical approval. Findings will be presented at conferences and published in a peer reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020193081.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dunn
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison B Rushton
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University Faculty of Health Sciences, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jai Mistry
- Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Physical Therapy, Western University Faculty of Health Sciences, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Soundy
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicola R Heneghan
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jamjoom AM, Saeedi RJ, Jamjoom AB. Placebo Effect of Sham Spine Procedures in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3057-3065. [PMID: 34616178 PMCID: PMC8488027 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s317697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The literature lacks information about the characteristics of the placebo effect following sham spine procedures for chronic low back pain. We aim to evaluate the effect using pain score data from the sham arms of published trials. Methods Relevant trials were selected and reviewed. Baseline and post-procedure pain scores were collected. Each follow up pain score was considered an episode and compared to its baseline for significance. Patients and episodes were pooled and analyzed using three parameters: patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Visual Analog Scale [VAS], Numerical Rating Scale [NRS] and Short Form-36 [SF]), anatomical targets (disc, facet, sacroiliac joint [SIJ], ramus communicans nerve [RCN], basivertebral nerve [BVN], and caudal) and follow up periods (early: 0–2, intermediate: >2–4 and late: >4–6) in months. The percentage of pooled patients in the episodes that had significant reduction in pain scores was termed placebo effect. The outcome was defining the magnitude of the placebo effect and determining if it was influenced by the three parameters. Results Seventeen studies that reported 535 patients and 55 pain scoring episodes were considered eligible. Significant reduction in pain scores was reported in 21 episodes. The overall placebo effect among the patients during the studied period was 53.2%. The rate ranged according to PROMs from 42.4% to 72.1%, anatomical targets from 11.1% to 100% and follow up periods from 47.9% to 59%. The placebo effect differed significantly between the various domains in the three parameters. Conclusion Placebo effect was observed in nearly half of the patients during the first 6 months following a sham spine procedure. The effect was influenced by utilized PROMs, anatomical target and follow up period. The findings should be considered in the design of new sham spine procedure trials. Further research is required to delineate the effect of bias on the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ammer M Jamjoom
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
| | - Rothaina J Saeedi
- Section of Neurosurgery, King Khalid National Guards Hospital and King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulhakim B Jamjoom
- Section of Neurosurgery, King Khalid National Guards Hospital and King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hunter DJ, Eyles J, Murphy NJ, Spiers L, Burns A, Davidson E, Dickenson E, Fary C, Foster NE, Fripp J, Griffin DR, Hall M, Kim YJ, Linklater JM, Molnar R, Neubert A, O'Connell RL, O'Donnell J, O'Sullivan M, Randhawa S, Reichenbach S, Schmaranzer F, Singh P, Tran P, Wilson D, Zhang H, Bennell KL. Multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing arthroscopic hip surgery to physiotherapist-led care for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome on hip cartilage metabolism: the Australian FASHIoN trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:697. [PMID: 34399702 PMCID: PMC8369620 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04576-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) is known to lead to self-reported symptom improvement. In the context of surgical interventions with known contextual effects and no true sham comparator trials, it is important to ascertain outcomes that are less susceptible to placebo effects. The primary aim of this trial was to determine if study participants with FAI who have hip arthroscopy demonstrate greater improvements in delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of cartilage (dGEMRIC) index between baseline and 12 months, compared to participants who undergo physiotherapist-led management. Methods Multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm superiority randomised controlled trial comparing physiotherapist-led management to hip arthroscopy for FAI. FAI participants were recruited from participating orthopaedic surgeons clinics, and randomly allocated to receive either physiotherapist-led conservative care or surgery. The surgical intervention was arthroscopic FAI surgery. The physiotherapist-led conservative management was an individualised physiotherapy program, named Personalised Hip Therapy (PHT). The primary outcome measure was change in dGEMRIC score between baseline and 12 months. Secondary outcomes included a range of patient-reported outcomes and structural measures relevant to FAI pathoanatomy and hip osteoarthritis development. Interventions were compared by intention-to-treat analysis. Results Ninety-nine participants were recruited, of mean age 33 years and 58% male. Primary outcome data were available for 53 participants (27 in surgical group, 26 in PHT). The adjusted group difference in change at 12 months in dGEMRIC was -59 ms (95%CI − 137.9 to - 19.6) (p = 0.14) favouring PHT. Hip-related quality of life (iHOT-33) showed improvements in both groups with the adjusted between-group difference at 12 months showing a statistically and clinically important improvement in arthroscopy of 14 units (95% CI 5.6 to 23.9) (p = 0.003). Conclusion The primary outcome of dGEMRIC showed no statistically significant difference between PHT and arthroscopic hip surgery at 12 months of follow-up. Patients treated with surgery reported greater benefits in symptoms at 12 months compared to PHT, but these benefits are not explained by better hip cartilage metabolism. Trial registration details Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry reference: ACTRN12615001177549. Trial registered 2/11/2015. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04576-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Hunter
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia. .,Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jillian Eyles
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.,Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Murphy
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gosford and Wyong Hospitals, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Libby Spiers
- Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Emily Davidson
- Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, 2035, Australia
| | - Edward Dickenson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.,University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Camdon Fary
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St. Albans, VIC, Australia
| | - Nadine E Foster
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.,Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jurgen Fripp
- The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Michelle Hall
- Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Young Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - James M Linklater
- Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Castlereagh Imaging, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert Molnar
- Sydney Orthopaedic Trauma & Reconstructive Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ales Neubert
- The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rachel L O'Connell
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.,NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - John O'Donnell
- Hip Arthroscopy Australia, 21 Erin St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.,St Vincent's Private Hospital, 159 Grey St, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael O'Sullivan
- North Sydney Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Centre, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sunny Randhawa
- Macquarie University Hospital, 3 Technology Pl, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Stephan Reichenbach
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Florian Schmaranzer
- Department Diagnostic, Interventional and Paediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Parminder Singh
- Hip Arthroscopy Australia, 21 Erin St, Richmond, Victoria, Australia.,Maroondah Hospital, Eastern Health, Davey Drive, Ringwood East, Melbourne, Victoria, 3135, Australia
| | - Phong Tran
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St. Albans, VIC, Australia
| | - David Wilson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Center for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Honglin Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Center for Hip Health and Mobility, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kim L Bennell
- Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wall L, Hinwood M, Lang D, Smith A, Bunzli S, Clarke P, Choong PFM, Dowsey MM, Paolucci F. Attitudes of patients and surgeons towards sham surgery trials: a protocol for a scoping review of attributes to inform a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035870. [PMID: 32161162 PMCID: PMC7066609 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In order to properly evaluate the efficacy of orthopaedic procedures, rigorous, randomised controlled sham surgery trial designs are necessary. However, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for surgery involving a placebo are ethically debated and difficult to conduct with many failing to reach their desired sample size and power. A review of the literature on barriers and enablers to recruitment, and patient and surgeon attitudes and preferences towards sham surgery trials, will help to determine the characteristics necessary for successful recruitment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review will scope the diverse literature surrounding sham surgery trials with the aim of informing a discrete choice experiment to empirically test patient and surgeon preferences for different sham surgery trial designs. The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the methodological framework described in Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols extension for Scoping Reviews. The review will be informed by a systematic search of Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL and EconLit databases (from database inception to 21 June 2019), a Google Scholar search, and hand searching of reference lists of relevant studies or reviews. Studies or opinion pieces that involve patient, surgeon or trial characteristics, which influence the decision to participate in a trial, will be included. Study selection will be carried out independently by two authors with discrepancies resolved by consensus among three authors. Data will be charted using a standardised form, and results tabulated and narratively summarised with reference to the research questions of the review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The findings from this review will inform the design of a discrete choice experiment around willingness to participate in surgical trials, the outcomes of which can inform decision and cost-effectiveness models of sham surgery RCTs. The qualitative information from this review will also inform patient-centred outcomes research. The review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019133296.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Wall
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle Faculty of Business and Law, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Madeleine Hinwood
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle Faculty of Health and Medicine, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Danielle Lang
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle Faculty of Health and Medicine, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Smith
- HNE Health Libraries, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samantha Bunzli
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Philip Clarke
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne-Parkville Campus, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Health Economics Research Centre, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter F M Choong
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle M Dowsey
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Francesco Paolucci
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle Faculty of Business and Law, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ickmans K, Voogt L, Nijs J. Rehabilitation Succeeds Where Technology and Pharmacology Failed: Effective Treatment of Persistent Pain across the Lifespan. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8122042. [PMID: 31766486 PMCID: PMC6947016 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8122042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Ickmans
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (L.V.); (J.N.)
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), 1000 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-(0)24774503
| | - Lennard Voogt
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (L.V.); (J.N.)
- Research Centre for Health Care Innovations, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, 3015 EK Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Physical Therapy Studies, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, 3015 EK Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium; (L.V.); (J.N.)
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Millar NL, Murrell GAC, Kirwan P. Time to put down the scalpel? The role of surgery in tendinopathy. Br J Sports Med 2019; 54:441-442. [PMID: 31653777 PMCID: PMC7146938 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Neal L Millar
- Institute of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - George A C Murrell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of New South Wales-St George Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Kirwan
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Physiotherapy Department, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Blanchardstown, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Challoumas D, Clifford C, Kirwan P, Millar NL. How does surgery compare to sham surgery or physiotherapy as a treatment for tendinopathy? A systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2019; 5:e000528. [PMID: 31191975 PMCID: PMC6539146 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the effectiveness of surgery on all tendinopathies by comparing it to no treatment, sham surgery and exercise-based therapies for both mid-term (12 months) and long-term (> 12 months) outcomes. Methods Our literature search included EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and Scopus. A combined assessment of internal validity, external validity and precision of each eligible study yielded its overall study quality. Results were considered significant if they were based on strong (Level 1) or moderate (Level 2) evidence. Results 12 studies were eligible. Participants had the following types of tendinopathy: shoulder in seven studies, lateral elbow in three, patellar in one and Achilles in one. Two studies were of good, four of moderate and six of poor overall quality. Surgery was superior to no treatment or placebo, for the outcomes of pain, function, range of movement (ROM) and treatment success in the short and midterm. Surgery had similar effects to sham surgery on pain, function and range of motion in the midterm. Physiotherapy was as effective as surgery both in the midterm and long term for pain, function, ROM and tendon force, and pain, treatment success and quality of life, respectively. Conclusion We recommend that healthcare professionals who treat tendinopathy encourage patients to comply with loading exercise treatment for at least 12 months before the option of surgery is seriously entertained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Challoumas
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Christopher Clifford
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.,Department of Physiotherapy, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul Kirwan
- School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Physiotherapy Department, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Blanchardstown, Ireland
| | - Neal L Millar
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
|
14
|
Abstract
ZusammenfassungUm das Lipödem ranken sich zahlreiche Mythen! In diesem vierten Beitrag unserer Artikelserie setzen wir uns mit dem Stellenwert der Liposuktion beim Lipödem auseinander. Wir diskutieren das von vielen die Liposuktion durchführenden Ärzten verbreitete Statement: „Die Liposuktion führt zu ausgeprägter und dauerhafter Verbesserung des Lipödems“. Wir konnten zeigen, dass zwischen den oft euphorischen Versprechungen der chirurgisch tätigen Kollegen und der aktuellen Studienlage zur Liposuktion eine erhebliche Lücke klafft. Sowohl Studienqualität als auch Studiensetting weisen erhebliche Mängel auf, Mängel, die Zweifel an diesem verbreiteten Statement aufkommen lassen. Eine ähnliche Lücke klafft darüber hinaus zwischen den Empfehlungen der S1-Leitlinie Lipödem und der tatsächlichen „Absaugpraxis“ bei adipösen Lipödempatientinnen. Die in den Leitlinien empfohlene „kritische Indikationsstellung“ bei gleichzeitigem Auftreten von Lipödem und Adipositas findet kaum Gehör. Es
kann daher nicht genug betont werden, dass Liposuktion keine Methode ist, um Adipositas zu behandeln. Gleichwohl kann die Liposuktion durchaus zu einer Verbesserung des Lipödems beitragen. Entscheidend für den Therapieerfolg ist die Auswahl der Patientinnen, die aufgrund – medizinischer – Kriterien erfolgen muss. Darüber sollte die Liposuktion in ein Gesamtkonzept eingebunden werden, welches psychosoziale, ernährungs- und sportmedizinische Gesichtspunkte berücksichtigt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Bertsch
- Földiklinik Hinterzarten, Europäisches Zentrum für Lymphologie
| | | | | |
Collapse
|