1
|
Klemperer EM, Kock L, Feinstein MJP, Coleman SRM, Gaalema DE, Higgins ST. Sex differences in tobacco use, attempts to quit smoking, and cessation among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: Longitudinal findings from the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Prev Med 2024:108112. [PMID: 39181738 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE A growing number of adults use more than one tobacco product, with dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes being the most common combination. Monitoring sex disparities in tobacco use is a public health priority. However, little is known regarding whether dual users differ by sex. METHODS Data came from Waves 4-6 (12/2016-11/2021) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, a US nationally-representative longitudinal survey. This analysis included current adult dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. We used weighted generalized estimating equations to assess the association between sex and (1) making a cigarette quit attempt (n = 1882 observations from n = 1526 individuals) and (2) smoking cessation (n = 2081 observations from n = 1688 individuals) across two wave pairs, adjusting for age, education, ethnicity, time-to-first cigarette after waking, and e-cigarette use frequency. RESULTS Among US dual users, 14.1% (95% Confidence Intervals [Cl] = 11.9-16.4) of females and 23.4% (20.0-26.9) of males were young adults (aged 18-24), 11.7% (9.2-14.2) of females and 14.4% (11.6-17.2) of males had CONCLUSION US females who dually use e-cigarettes and cigarettes were more likely to attempt to quit smoking, but not more likely to succeed at quitting, than males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias M Klemperer
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America.
| | - Loren Kock
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Marc Jerome P Feinstein
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Sulamunn R M Coleman
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, United States of America
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klemperer EM, Kock L, Feinstein MJP, Coleman SRM, Gaalema DE, Higgins ST. Sex differences in tobacco use, attempts to quit smoking, and cessation among dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes: Longitudinal findings from the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Prev Med 2024; 185:108024. [PMID: 38849056 PMCID: PMC11269003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE A growing number of adults use more than one tobacco product, with dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes being the most common combination. Monitoring sex disparities in tobacco use is a public health priority. However, little is known regarding whether dual users differ by sex. METHODS Data came from Waves 4-6 (12/2016-11/2021) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, a US nationally-representative longitudinal survey. This analysis included current adult dual users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. We used weighted generalized estimating equations to assess the association between sex and (1) making a cigarette quit attempt (n = 1882 observations from n = 1526 individuals) and (2) smoking cessation (n = 2081 observations from n = 1688 individuals) across two wave pairs, adjusting for age, education, ethnicity, time-to-first cigarette after waking, and e-cigarette use frequency. RESULTS Among US dual users, 14.1% (95% Confidence Intervals [Cl] = 11.9-16.4) of females and 23.4% (20.0-26.9) of males were young adults (aged 18-24), 11.7% (9.2-14.2) of females and 14.4% (11.6-17.2) of males had CONCLUSION US females who dual use e-cigarettes and cigarettes were more likely to attempt to quit smoking, but not more likely to succeed at quitting, than males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias M Klemperer
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America.
| | - Loren Kock
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Marc Jerome P Feinstein
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Sulamunn R M Coleman
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| | - Diann E Gaalema
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, United States of America
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior & Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alam F, Silveyra P. Sex Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Related Health Effects. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:7079. [PMID: 37998310 PMCID: PMC10671806 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20227079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) comprise a variety of products designed to deliver nicotine, flavorings, and other substances. To date, multiple epidemiological and experimental studies have reported a variety of health issues associated with their use, including respiratory toxicity, exacerbation of respiratory conditions, and behavioral and physiological effects. While some of these effects appear to be sex- and/or gender-related, only a portion of the research has been conducted considering these variables. In this review, we sought to summarize the available literature on sex-specific effects and sex and gender differences, including predictors and risk factors, effects on organ systems, and behavioral effects. METHODS We searched and selected articles from 2018-2023 that included sex as a variable or reported sex differences on e-cigarette-associated effects. RESULTS We found 115 relevant studies published since 2018 that reported sex differences in a variety of outcomes. The main differences reported were related to reasons for initiation, including smoking history, types of devices and flavoring, polysubstance use, physiological responses to nicotine and toxicants in e-liquids, exacerbation of lung disease, and behavioral factors such as anxiety, depression, sexuality, and bullying. CONCLUSIONS The available literature supports the notion that both sex and gender influence the susceptibility to the negative effects of e-cigarette use. Future research needs to consider sex and gender variables when addressing e-cigarette toxicity and other health-related consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Alam
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Indiana University School of Public Health Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA;
| | - Patricia Silveyra
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Indiana University School of Public Health Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA;
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 47405, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Colston DC, Cruz JL, Simard BJ, Fleischer NL. A Systematic Review Evaluating Disparities in State-Run Quitline Utilization and Effectiveness in the U.S. AJPM FOCUS 2023; 2:100042. [PMID: 37789942 PMCID: PMC10546598 DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
Context Cigarette smoking is a public health problem in the U.S. and is marked by pervasive sociodemographic disparities. State-run quitlines may offer greater access to cessation services that could in turn help to reduce smoking disparities. The aim of this review was to synthesize the body of literature regarding sociodemographic disparities in the utilization and effectiveness of state-run quitlines. Evidence acquisition The PRISMA guidelines were followed in conducting this review. Included articles were published between January 1, 1992 and May 28, 2019 and sourced from PubMed and Web of Science. Studies that evaluated state-run quitline utilization or effectiveness (cessation) by sex, race/ethnicity, sexual or gender identity, or SES (income, education, insurance) were included. Evidence synthesis Our search yielded 2,091 unique articles, 17 of which met the criteria for inclusion. This review found that quitline utilization was higher among Black and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals than among White individuals and among people with lower income and lower education than among people with higher income and higher education. Quitline use was associated with less smoking cessation among females than among males, among American Indian/Alaskan Native individuals than among individuals from all other races and ethnicities, and among individuals of lower than among those of higher income and education. Conclusions This review found that although communities disproportionately affected by smoking utilize quitlines more commonly than their White and more affluent peers, disparities in cessation persist for American Indian/Alaskan Native and individuals from lower SES groups who use quitlines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C. Colston
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jennifer L. Cruz
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Bethany J. Simard
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nancy L. Fleischer
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tehrani H, Rajabi A, Ghelichi- Ghojogh M, Nejatian M, Jafari A. The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Public Health 2022; 80:240. [PMID: 36415010 PMCID: PMC9682677 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-022-00998-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this systematic review study was to determine the national, regional, and global prevalence of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) vaping. METHOD The articles were searched in July 2020 without a time limit in Web of Science (ISI), Scopus, PubMed, and Ovid-MEDLINE. At first, the titles and abstracts of the articles were reviewed, and if they were appropriate, they entered the second stage of screening. In the second stage, the whole articles were reviewed and articles that met the inclusion criteria were selected. In this study, search, selection of studies, qualitative evaluation, and data extraction were performed by two authors independently, and any disagreement between the two authors was reviewed and corrected by a third author. RESULTS In this study, the lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping globally were 23% and 11%, respectively. Lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in women were 16% and 8%, respectively. Also, lifetime and current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in men were 22% and 12%, respectively. In this study, the current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in who had lifetime smoked conventional cigarette was 39%, and in current smokers was 43%. The lifetime prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in the Continents of America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania were 24%, 26%, 16%, and 25%, respectively. The current prevalence of e-cigarettes vaping in the Continents of America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania were 10%, 14%, 11%, and 6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the popularity of e-cigarettes is increasing globally. Therefore, it is necessary for countries to have more control over the consumption and distribution of e-cigarettes, as well as to formulate the laws prohibiting about the e-cigarettes vaping in public places. There is also a need to design and conduct information campaigns to increase community awareness about e-cigarettes vaping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadi Tehrani
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Abdolhalim Rajabi
- Environmental Health Research Center, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
| | | | - Mahbobeh Nejatian
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| | - Alireza Jafari
- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim J, Lee S, Chun J. An International Systematic Review of Prevalence, Risk, and Protective Factors Associated with Young People's E-Cigarette Use. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11570. [PMID: 36141845 PMCID: PMC9517489 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
While the prevalence of young people's conventional cigarette use has decreased in many countries, the use of e-cigarettes has risen. To effectively counteract the growing popularity of e-cigarettes among young people internationally, researchers should know the exact prevalence as well as the protective and risk factors associated with vaping. Based on five eligibility criteria, 53 articles were chosen and analyzed by general characteristics, prevalence, sample characteristics, gender difference, protective factors, and risk factors. In this study, the international pooled prevalence of young people's lifetime e-cigarette use was 15.3%, the current use was 7.7%, and dual use was 4.0%. While the highest lifetime, current, and dual prevalence were found in Sweden, Canada, and the United Kingdom, respectively, the lowest prevalence was found in Germany, followed by South Korea and Sweden. Some protective and risk factors include perceived cost and danger of vaping, parental monitoring, internal developmental assets, cigarette use, family and peer smoking, exposure to online advertisements, and the presence of nearby retail stores. Based on this review, researchers and practitioners can develop different intervention programs and strategies for young smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - JongSerl Chun
- Department of Social Welfare, Ewha Womans University, 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bedi MK, Bedi DK, Ledgerwood DM. Gender Differences in Reasons for Using E-Cigarettes: A Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob Res 2022; 24:1355-1362. [PMID: 35439816 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Differential reasons for e-cigarette use for men and women have seldom been examined, and there is no systematic overview of this research literature. The aim for this review is to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify gender differences in the reasons for e-cigarette use. METHODS Systematic searches covered in three databases found 866 unique articles: Web of Science, Pubmed and PsycInfo. Twenty six studies met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Reasons for e-cigarette use were sorted into 17 distinct categories. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Fifteen studies identified statistically significant differences in reasons between men and women. Frequently assessed reasons for e-cigarette use across studies included Health/Smoking Cessation, Experimentation/Curiosity, Enjoyment/Pleasure, Use in Specific Locations, Acceptable to Others, and Cost. Of those that identified statistically significant differences in reasons between men and women, the findings varied considerably, and some reasons for e-cigarette use were found to be significant in only one or two studies. Most of the reasons identified were only measured in a small number of studies, complicating our ability to make intervention recommendations based on gender. Additionally, we limited our literature search to peer-reviewed studies. Of the reason categories that did find significant differences between gender, such as reasons related to Health/Smoking Cessation, the outcomes were not consistent across studies. Future studies are needed to identify potentially important differences in the reasons for e-cigarette use among men and women. IMPLICATION This systematic review aims to uncover gender differences in e-cigarette use to understand important differences in motivation for use that may help us better understand strategies for prevention and treatment of tobacco use disorder. This review is the first on this topic and could provide further insight on patterns of e-cigarette use across gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mannat K Bedi
- All Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University
| | - Danishi K Bedi
- All Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University
| | - David M Ledgerwood
- All Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Goldenson NI, Augustson EM, Shiffman S. Differences in switching away from cigarettes and JUUL use characteristics among adult menthol and nonmenthol smokers who purchased the JUUL System. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 231:109238. [PMID: 34974269 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Studies have assessed switching away from cigarettes among adult smokers who use electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), but there is little data assessing differences in likelihood of switching or ENDS use characteristics by menthol smoking. METHODS Adult (age ≥ 21) established smokers who purchased a JUUL Starter Kit (N = 15,036) completed baseline and 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month assessments. Switching (no past-30-day cigarette smoking) and flavor use were assessed at each follow-up. Repeated-measure logistic regression models evaluated association of menthol smoking and switching across 1 year. RESULTS Across the 6 follow-ups, more menthol smokers primarily used Menthol/Mint-flavored JUULpods (53.8%) than nonmenthol smokers (22.9%). Only 6.4% of menthol smokers primarily used Tobacco flavors (vs. 25.9% of nonmenthol smokers). Across all follow-ups menthol smokers (41.2% of sample) were more likely to switch than nonmenthol smokers (42.6% vs. 38.8%: OR [95% CI] = 1.17 [1.11, 1.23]); this association remained significant after adjustment for sociodemographic, smoking and JUUL use covariates (aOR [95% CI] = 1.13 [1.05, 1.21]). Nonmenthol smokers, but not menthol smokers, were significantly more likely to switch when primarily using Menthol/Mint-flavored (vs. Tobacco-flavored) JUULpods (aOR [95% CI] = 1.14 [1.04, 1.25]). Differences in baseline smoking characteristics between menthol and nonmenthol smokers were small in magnitude. CONCLUSIONS Adult menthol (vs. nonmenthol) smokers using JUUL were more likely to switch. More than twice as many menthol (vs. nonmenthol) smokers primarily used Menthol/Mint-flavor JUULpods; few menthol smokers used tobacco flavors. Given these pronounced differences in flavor preferences, availability of ENDS in menthol flavors may be particularly important for menthol smokers, but may also benefit some nonmenthol smokers.
Collapse
|
9
|
Allagbé I, Le Faou AL, Thomas D, Airagnes G, Limosin F, Chagué F, Zeller M. Tobacco-related cardiovascular risk in women: New issues and therapeutic perspectives. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2021; 114:694-706. [PMID: 34593343 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking is the main modifiable risk factor for stroke and myocardial infarction, particularly in women; its prevalence in France is evolving, and new patterns of nicotine consumption have emerged. AIMS To present contemporary data on smoking prevalence and the use of electronic cigarettes, and to describe current knowledge of the cardiovascular risk specificities and the effectiveness of withdrawal methods in women. METHOD We identified studies by searching the MEDLINE bibliographic database between 1995 and 2020, and the Weekly Epidemiological Bulletin (Bulletin Épidémiologique Hebdomadaire) published by the French health authorities. RESULT In recent years, smoking prevalence among French women has decreased overall, except in the oldest age group (aged>55 years). At the same time, the incidence of hospitalization for cardiovascular events has increased worryingly among women smokers aged<65 years. Active smoking in women is associated with an increased risk of premature myocardial infarction, and a risk of stroke that increases with the number of cigarettes consumed per day; it is also responsible for increased cardiovascular events in women taking oestrogen-progestin contraception. Quitting smoking reverses these effects in the long term, and women are just as likely to quit smoking as men. CONCLUSIONS Stopping smoking must be a priority objective for women smokers, for primary and secondary prevention, and they should systematically be offered a validated method of cessation or even electronic cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Allagbé
- Team Physiopathlogy and Epidemiology Cerebro-Cardiovascular (PEC2), EA 7460, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, Faculté des Sciences de Santé, 7, boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, 21000 Dijon, France; Outpatient Addiction Centre, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Anne-Laurence Le Faou
- Outpatient Addiction Centre, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, 75015 Paris, France; Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire Network of Research in Substance Use Disorder, Ile-de-France, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Thomas
- Institut de Cardiologie, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Université Paris-VI-Sorbonne, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Airagnes
- Outpatient Addiction Centre, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, 75015 Paris, France; Population-based Epidemiologic Cohorts, UMS 011, Inserm, 94807 Villejuif, France
| | - Frédéric Limosin
- DMU Psychiatry and Addictology, Corentin Celton Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, 92130 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France; Psychiatry and Neurosciences Centre, U894, Inserm, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Chagué
- Cardiology Department, Dijon University Hospital, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Marianne Zeller
- Team Physiopathlogy and Epidemiology Cerebro-Cardiovascular (PEC2), EA 7460, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, Faculté des Sciences de Santé, 7, boulevard Jeanne d'Arc, 21000 Dijon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mayorga NA, Smit T, Garey L, Gold AK, Otto MW, Zvolensky MJ. Evaluating the Interactive Effect of COVID-19 Worry and Loneliness on Mental Health Among Young Adults. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH 2021; 46:11-19. [PMID: 34334844 PMCID: PMC8310460 DOI: 10.1007/s10608-021-10252-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young adults are overrepresented in terms of adverse mental health problems related to COVID-19. Emerging work has identified worry about the consequences and trajectory of COVID-19 and loneliness as important factors in mental health during the pandemic. However, the main and interactive effects of worry about COVID-19 and loneliness have not been explored in one overarching model in relation to mental health problems among young adults. METHODS The present study therefore evaluated loneliness and COVID-19 related worry in terms of anxiety, stress, and depression among young adults (209 college students, 76.1% female, M age = 22.99 years, SD = 5.25) recruited to participate in an online survey study. RESULTS Results indicated a significant interaction between COVID-19 worry and loneliness for each criterion variable (depression: b = .01, SE = .003, t = 2.86, p = .01; anxiety: b = .01, SE = .002, t = 2.36, p = .02; stress: b = .01, SE = .003, t = 2.54, p = .01), such that worry was more strongly related to each mental health outcome among those that endorsed higher levels of loneliness. CONCLUSION The current findings suggest loneliness is related to negative mental health symptoms among young adults experiencing COVID-19 related worry. The current findings provide initial empirical evidence for the impact of COVID-19 worry on mental health among young adults experiencing loneliness. Future research may benefit from exploring how COVID-19 worry and loneliness interplay over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nubia A. Mayorga
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Blvd., 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77204 USA
| | - Tanya Smit
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Blvd., 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77204 USA
| | - Lorra Garey
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Blvd., 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77204 USA
| | - Alexandra K. Gold
- Department of Psychology & Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA USA
| | - Michael W. Otto
- Department of Psychology & Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA USA
| | - Michael J. Zvolensky
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, 3695 Cullen Blvd., 126 Heyne Building, Houston, TX 77204 USA
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- HEALTH Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goldenson NI, Ding Y, Prakash S, Hatcher C, Augustson EM, Shiffman S. Differences in Switching Away From Smoking Among Adult Smokers Using JUUL Products in Regions With Different Maximum Nicotine Concentrations: North America and the United Kingdom. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23:1821-1830. [PMID: 34002223 PMCID: PMC8653762 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may improve public health if they
facilitate smokers switching away from cigarettes. Conceptually, switching
is facilitated when ENDS provide adequate nicotine delivery. Switching rates
among smokers who purchased the JUUL System (“JUUL”) were
compared in the United Kingdom (UK), where regulations limit nicotine
concentration to 20 mg/mL versus North America (N.Am.; United States and
Canada), where higher concentrations are available. Aims and Methods Adult established smokers (age ≥21, smoked ≥100 cigarettes,
smoking some days or every day at baseline) who newly purchased JUUL were
recruited into a longitudinal study (UK: N = 1247; N.Am.:
N = 8835). Complete switching (no smoking for
≥30 days) was assessed 1, 3, and 6 months after purchase; propensity
score matching (PSM) and logistic regression compared switching after
adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results In both N.Am. and UK, ≥82% of participants reported using the highest
JUUL nicotine concentration available (UK: 18 mg/mL; N.Am.: 59 mg/mL).
Unadjusted switching rates did not differ at 1 month (17%–18%);
unadjusted and adjusted rates were significantly higher in N.Am. (vs. UK) at
3 and 6 months. In the PSM sample, after additional covariate adjustment,
rates were significantly higher in N.Am. (vs. UK) at 3 months (31.5% vs.
22.7%; odds ratio [95% confidence interval, CI] = 1.59 [1.25, 2.02]) and 6
months (38.0% vs. 26.0%; odds ratio [95% CI] = 1.79 [1.37, 2.35]). Conclusions These results suggest availability of ENDS in nicotine concentrations greater
than 20 mg/mL may be associated with increased switching among adult
smokers. Differences in smoking and ENDS use characteristics did not explain
associations of location and switching; however, between-country differences
may be affected by unmeasured factors. Implications Switching rates were lower among smokers who purchased the JUUL System
(“JUUL”) in the UK, where regulations limit nicotine
concentration to 20 mg/mL versus N.Am. (United States and Canada), where
higher concentrations are available—before and after controlling for
differences in smoking and ENDS use characteristics. These results suggest
availability of ENDS in nicotine concentrations greater than 20 mg/mL may be
associated with increased switching among adult smokers. Between-country
differences may be affected by unmeasured factors; future research should
consider these factors and the extent to which regulatory policy
environments may explain differences in switching among adult smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yu Ding
- Juul Labs, Inc., Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smit T, Olofsson H, Nizio P, Garey L, Zvolensky MJ. Pain severity and e-cigarette health literacy: the moderating role of sex. SUBSTANCE ABUSE-RESEARCH AND TREATMENT 2020; 13:1178221819897070. [PMID: 31908468 PMCID: PMC6937532 DOI: 10.1177/1178221819897070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Although electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has increased among adults in the United States, there is still little knowledge of factors that may influence e-cigarette use or beliefs about use. Prior research suggests that health literacy plays an important role in e-cigarette beliefs, including perceived benefits and risks of e-cigarette use, as well as e-cigarette dependence. Yet, limited work has examined risk factors of poor e-cigarette health literacy. From a biopsychological perspective, sex and pain severity represent two constructs that may impact e-cigarette health literacy. To date, however, no research has investigated differences in e-cigarette health literacy across pain, sex, or their interrelation. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the interactive effect of pain severity and sex on e-cigarette health literacy. Participants included 319 current, adult e-cigarette users (60.5% female, Mage = 36.82 years, SD = 10.62). Findings supported a significant pain by sex interaction, such that pain related to e-cigarette health literacy among women (b = .10, SE = .03, P < .001), but not men (b = .01, SE = .03, P = .60). The present findings suggest that pain may uniquely impact the degree to which women, but not men, seek and understand information on e-cigarettes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya Smit
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hannah Olofsson
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pamella Nizio
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lorra Garey
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael J Zvolensky
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,HEALTH Institute, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|