The characteristics of patients with possible familial hypercholesterolemia-screening a large payer/provider healthcare delivery system

Risk factors for cardiovascular events in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (heFH) is the most common monogenic cause of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The precise diagnosis of heFH is established by genetic testing. This systematic review will investigate the risk factors that predict cardiovascular events in patients with a genetic diagnosis of heFH.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our literature search will cover publications from database inception until June 2023. We will undertake a search of CINAHL (trial), clinicalKey, Cochrane Library, DynaMed, Embase, Espacenet, Experiments (trial), Fisterra, ÍnDICEs CSIC, LILACS, LISTA, Medline, Micromedex, NEJM Resident 360, OpenDissertations, PEDro, Trip Database, PubPsych, Scopus, TESEO, UpToDate, Web of Science and the grey literature for eligible studies. We will screen the title, abstract and full-text papers for potential inclusion and assess the risk of bias. We will employ the Cochrane tool for randomised controlled trials and non-randomised clinical studies and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing the risk of bias in observational studies. We will include full-text peer-reviewed publications, reports of a cohort/registry, case-control and cross-sectional studies, case report/series and surveys related to adults (≥18 years of age) with a genetic diagnostic heFH. The language of the searched studies will be restricted to English or Spanish. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the quality of the evidence. Based on the data available, the authors will determine whether the data can be pooled in meta-analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All data will be extracted from published literature. Hence, ethical approval and patient informed consent are not required. The findings of the systematic review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022304273.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Among Young Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome

There are limited data on the prevalence and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) among Israeli adults who experience premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of FH among young Israeli adults with ACS, examine the rates of lipid-lowering therapy administration, and determine low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels 1 year after ACS. Patients aged ≤55 years hospitalized for ACS at Meir Medical Center between 2018 and 2019 were included. Probable/definite FH was defined using the Dutch Lipid Clinic criteria. Outcomes included the proportion of patients with probable or definite FH, rate of use of lipid-lowering medications, LDL-C levels 1 year postadmission, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during 30 months of follow-up. The study population comprised 687 young adults with a median age of 48.5 years. Definite/probable FH was present in 61 patients (8.9%). At 1 year of follow-up, the proportions of patients without FH who had LDL-C levels <70 and <55 mg/100 ml were higher than those of patients with FH (55.9% vs 18%, p <0.001 and 35.8% vs 11.5%, p <0.001, respectively). At 1 year of follow-up, only 47.5% and 22% of patients with FH were treated with ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor than were those without FH. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was significantly higher among patients with FH. In conclusion, clinically defined FH was present in nearly 1 of 11 patients with premature ACS. There is a necessity for more aggressive lipid-lowering therapies in patients with FH after experiencing ACS.

Leveraging Healthcare System Data to Identify High-Risk Dyslipidemia Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

While randomized controlled trials have historically served as the gold standard for shaping guideline recommendations, real-world data are increasingly being used to inform clinical decision-making. We describe ways in which healthcare systems are generating real-world data related to dyslipidemia and how these data are being leveraged to improve patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

The electronic medical record has emerged as a major source of clinical data, which alongside claims and pharmacy dispending data is enabling healthcare systems the ability to identify care gaps (underdiagnosis and undertreatment) in patients with dyslipidemia. Availability of this data also allows healthcare systems the ability to test and deliver interventions at the point-of-care. Real-world data possess great potential as a complement to randomized controlled trials. Healthcare systems are uniquely positioned to not only define care gaps and areas of opportunity, but to also to leverage tools (e.g., clinical decision support, case identification) aimed at closing them.

Clinical decision support for familial hypercholesterolemia (CDS-FH): Rationale and design of a cluster randomized trial in primary care

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated genetic disorder with high risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and death. Clinical decision support (CDS) systems have the potential to aid in the identification and management of patients with FH. Prior studies using computer-based systems to screen patients for FH have shown promising results, but there has been no randomized controlled trial conducted. The aim of the current cluster randomized study is to evaluate if a CDS can increase the identification of FH.

METHODS

We have developed a CDS integrated in the electronic health records that will be activated in patients with elevated cholesterol levels (total cholesterol >8 mmol/L or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol >5.5 mmol/L, adjusted for age, ongoing lipid lowering therapy and presence of premature coronary artery disease) at increased risk for FH. When activated, the CDS will urge the physician to send an automatically generated referral to the local lipid clinic for further evaluation. To evaluate the effects of the CDS, all primary care clinics will be cluster randomized 1:1 to either CDS intervention or standard care in a Swedish region with almost 500,000 inhabitants. The primary endpoint will be the number of patients diagnosed with FH at 30 months. Resource use and long-term health consequences will be estimated to assess the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Despite increasing awareness of FH, the condition remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. The present study will investigate whether a CDS can increase the number of patients being diagnosed with FH.

Strategies for screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care and other community settings

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a common inherited condition that is associated with premature cardiovascular disease. The increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, resulting from high levels of cholesterol since birth, can be prevented by starting lipid-lowering therapy. However, the majority of patients in the UK and worldwide remain undiagnosed. Established diagnostic criteria in current clinical practice are the Simon-Broome and Dutch Lipid Clinical network criteria and patients are classified as having probable, possible or definite familial hypercholesterolaemia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of healthcare interventions strategies to systematically improve identification of familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care and other community settings compared to usual care (incidental approaches to identify familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care and other community settings).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register. Date of last search: 13 September 2021. We also searched databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and SCOPUS) as well as handsearching relevant conference proceedings, reference lists of included articles, and the grey literature. Date of last searches: 05 March 2020.  SELECTION CRITERIA: As per the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group guidelines, we planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster-RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSI). Eligible NRSI were non-randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, controlled before-and-after studies, and interrupted-time-series studies. We planned to selected studies with healthcare interventions strategies that aimed to systematically identify people with possible or definite clinical familial hypercholesterolaemia, in primary care and other community settings. These strategies would be compared with usual care or no intervention. We considered participants of any age from the general population who access primary care and other community settings.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors planned to independently select studies according to the inclusion criteria, to extract data and assess for risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence (according to the GRADE criteria). We contacted corresponding study authors in order to obtain further information for all the studies considered in the review.

MAIN RESULTS

No eligible RCTs or NRSIs were identified for inclusion, however, we excluded 28 studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there are no RCTs or controlled NRSI evidence to determine the most appropriate healthcare strategy to systematically identify possible or definite clinical familial hypercholesterolaemia in primary care or other community settings. Uncontrolled before-and-after studies were identified, but were not eligible for inclusion. Further studies assessing healthcare strategies of systematic identification of familial hypercholesterolaemia need to be conducted with diagnosis confirmed by genetic testing or validated through clinical phenotype (or both).

Detection of Familial Hypercholesterolemia through centralized analytical data. HF HUELVA DETECTA Program

BACKGROUND

Familial Hypercholesterolemia is the most frequent genetic cause of premature coronary heart disease. The delay in the diagnosis prevents the correct early treatment. There are no effective screening strategies at the national level that ensure a correct diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the capacity of a centralized laboratory for the diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia through the creation of a health program for population screening in the province of Huelva.

METHOD

Active search of patients with primary hypercholesterolemia through the blood tests carried out in the reference laboratories with results of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol greater than 200 mg/dl and assessment in the Lipid Unit of Huelva to identify index cases, with subsequent family cascade screening.

RESULTS

37,440 laboratory tests with lipid profile were examined. After screening, 846 individuals were seen in the Lipid Unit, of which they were diagnosed according to criteria of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network as possible 654 and probable/definitive 192 individuals, representing 1.74% and 0.51% of the general population examined respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The point prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in patients submitted to laboratory lipid profile tests was 1:195, higher compared to the prevalence of Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the general population (based on 1 in 200-300). The opportunistic search strategy of the index case through a laboratory alert and centralized screening is an efficient strategy to implement a national screening for the diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Systematic Identification of Familial Hypercholesterolaemia in Primary Care-A Systematic Review

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited cause of premature cardiovascular disease, but the majority of patients remain undiagnosed. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of interventions to systematically identify FH in primary care. No randomised, controlled studies were identified; however, three non-randomised intervention studies were eligible for inclusion. All three studies systematically identified FH using reminders (on-screen prompts) in electronic health records. There was insufficient evidence that providing comments on laboratory test results increased the identification of FH using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria. Similarly, using prompts combined with postal invitation demonstrated no significant increase in definite FH identification using Simon-Broome (SB) criteria; however, the identification of possible FH increased by 25.4% (CI 17.75 to 33.97%). Using on-screen prompts alone demonstrated a small increase of 0.05% (95% CI 0.03 to 0.07%) in identifying definite FH using SB criteria; however, when the intervention was combined with an outreach FH nurse assessment, the result was no significant increase in FH identification using a combination of SB and DLCN criteria. None of the included studies reported adverse effects associated with the interventions. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to determine which is the most effective method of systematically identifying FH in non-specialist settings.

Non-coronary atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia

Objective: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common autosomal dominant inherited disease, affecting 1 in 200-500 individuals worldwide. FH is characterized by elevated circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations. Its association with increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) (>10-fold, compared with patients without FH) is well documented. However, the association between FH and non-CHD atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk has been poorly documented.Methods: PubMed was searched for English language publications regarding the association between FH and carotid artery stenosis, stroke, peripheral artery disease (PAD; lower limbs and other arterial beds), aortic valve calcification (AoVC), aortic and renal artery disease, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation and heart failure, from conception until 22 December 2019.Results: Despite the small number of available studies, as well as their characteristics (sample size, diagnostic criteria used, retrospective or cross-sectional design), there is evidence for a positive association between FH and stroke, PAD or AoVC. More data are needed for definitive conclusions regarding aortic and renal artery disease, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation and heart failure. There is paucity of data with respect to homozygous FH. Increased lipoprotein (a) concentrations, often seen in FH patients, may also contribute to this non-CHD atherosclerotic process. A key question is whether statins or other LDL-C-lowering therapies, provide an additional reduction in the risk of these less-recognized vascular and non-vascular complications in FH patients.Conclusions: Heterozygous FH is associated with increased risk for stroke, PAD and AoVC. Clinicians should take these non-CHD ASCVD aspects into consideration for optimal management of FH patients.