Relationship of Fatigue, Pain Interference, and Physical Disability in Children Newly Diagnosed With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Our objectives were to quantify the relationships among fatigue, pain interference, and physical disability in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and to test whether fatigue mediates the relationship between pain interference and physical disability in JIA.

METHODS

Patients enrolled within three months of JIA diagnosis in the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators (CAPRI) Registry between February 2017 and May 2023 were included. Their parents completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System fatigue and pain interference short proxy questionnaires and the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index at registry enrollment. Associations were assessed using Pearson correlations and multiple linear regression. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test if fatigue mediates the relationship between pain interference and physical disability.

RESULTS

Among 855 patients (61.4% female, 44.1% with oligoarthritis), most reported fatigue and pain interference scores similar to those in the reference population, but 15.6% reported severe fatigue and 7.3% reported severe pain interference, with wide variation across JIA categories. Fatigue was strongly correlated with pain interference (r = 0.72, P < 0.001) and with physical disability (r = 0.60, P < 0.001). Pain interference (β = 0.027, P < 0.001) and fatigue (β = 0.013, P < 0.001) were both associated with physical disability after controlling for each other and potential confounders. SEM supported our hypothesis that fatigue partially mediates the relationship between pain interference and physical disability.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest both fatigue and pain interference are independently associated with physical disability in children newly diagnosed with JIA, and the effect of pain interference may be partly mediated by fatigue.

Clinical Characteristics of Adolescents With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Transitioning to Adult Rheumatology Care in Canada: Results From the CAPRI Registry

OBJECTIVE

Using Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators (CAPRI) juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) registry data, we describe (1) clinical characteristics of patients with JIA transitioning to adult care, (2) prevalence of disease-related damage and complications, and (3) changes in disease activity during the final year prior to transfer.

METHODS

Registry participants who turned 17 years between February 2017 and November 2021 were included. Clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at the last recorded pediatric rheumatology visit, and changes observed in the year prior to that visit were analyzed. Physicians completed an additional questionnaire characterizing cumulative disease-related damage and adverse events by age 17 years.

RESULTS

At their last visit, 88 of 131 participants (67%) had inactive and 42 (32%) had active disease. Overall, 96 (73%) were on medications and 41 (31%) were on biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Among 80 participants for whom the additional questionnaire was completed, 26% had clinically detected joint damage, 31% had joint damage on imaging, 14% had uveitis, and 7.5% had experienced at least 1 serious adverse event. During the final year, 44.2% of patients were in remission, 28.4% attained inactive disease, and 27.4% became or remained active. Mean scores of PROs were stable overall during that last year, but a minority reported marked worsening.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of youth with JIA transitioning to adult care in Canada had a high disease burden, which was reflected by their degree of disease activity, joint damage, or ongoing medication use. These results will inform pediatric and adult providers of anticipated needs during transition of care.

A decade of progress in juvenile idiopathic athritis treatments and outcomes in Canada: results from ReACCh-Out and the CAPRI registry

OBJECTIVE

To assess changes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatments and outcomes in Canada, comparing a 2005-2010 and a 2017-2021 inception cohorts.

METHODS

Patients enrolled within three months of diagnosis in the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children Emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh-Out) and the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators Registry (CAPRI) cohorts were included. Cumulative incidences of drug starts and outcome attainment within 70 weeks of diagnosis were compared with Kaplan Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

The 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 cohorts included 1128 and 721 patients, respectively. JIA category distribution and baseline clinical juvenile idiopathic arthritis disease activity (cJADAS10) scores at enrolment were comparable. By 70 weeks, 6% of patients (95% CI 5, 7) in the 2005-2010 and 26% (23, 30) in the 2017-2021 cohort had started a biologic DMARD (bDMARD), and 43% (40, 47) and 60% (56, 64) had started a conventional DMARD (cDMARD), respectively. Outcome attainment was 64% (61, 67) and 83% (80, 86) for Inactive disease (Wallace criteria), 69% (66, 72) and 84% (81, 87) for minimally active disease (cJADAS10 criteria), 57% (54, 61) and 63% (59, 68) for pain control (<1/10), and 52% (47, 56) and 54% (48, 60) for a good health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Although baseline disease characteristics were comparable in the 2005-2010 and 2017-2021 cohorts, cDMARD and bDMARD use increased with a concurrent increase in minimally active and inactive disease. Improvements in parent and patient reported outcomes were smaller than improvements in disease activity.

Development and validation of the Kids Disability Screen for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the CAPRI Registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a brief disability screen for children with JIA, the Kids Disability Screen (KDS).

METHODS

A total of 216 children enrolled in the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators (CAPRI) Registry in 2017-2018 formed a development cohort, and 220 children enrolled in 2019-2020 formed a validation cohort. At every clinic visit, parents answered two questions derived from the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ): 'Is it hard for your child to run and play BECAUSE OF ARTHRITIS?' ('Hard' 0-10), and 'Does your child usually need help from you or another person BECAUSE OF ARTHRITIS?' ('Help', 0-10). We used 36-fold cross-validation and tested nine different mathematical methods to combine the answers and optimize psychometric properties. The results were confirmed in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Expressed as the mean of the two answers, KDS best balanced ease of use and psychometric properties, while a LASSO regression model combining the two answers with other patient characteristics [estimated CHAQ [eCHAQ]) had the highest responsiveness. In the validation cohort, 22.7%, 25.9% and 28.6% of patients had a score of 0 at enrolment for the KDS, eCHAQ and CHAQ, respectively. Responsiveness was 0.67, 0.74 and 0.62, respectively. Sensitivity to detect a CHAQ > 0 was 0.90 and specificity 0.56, KDS detecting some disability in 44% of children with a CHAQ = 0.

CONCLUSION

This simple KDS has psychometric properties comparable with those of a full CHAQ and may be used at every clinic visit to identify those children who need a full disability assessment.

Comparing Canadian pediatric rheumatology practice to the 2019 ACR Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis guidelines. Results from the CAPRI Registry

OBJECTIVE

To identify differences between baseline Canadian JIA practices and the 2019 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA Guidelines).

METHODS

Canadian pediatric rheumatologists were surveyed for their opinion on reasonable a priori target adherence rates for JIA Guideline recommendations. Then, prospectively collected data for 266 newly diagnosed children from 2017 to 2019 were analyzed to calculate observed adherence rates. Kaplan Meier survival curves were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of starting synthetic or biologic DMARDs for different patient groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 61 (41%) eligible physicians answered the survey. Most survey respondents (64%) felt that adherence targets should vary depending on the strength of recommendation and quality of evidence, from a mean of 84% for strong recommendations with high quality evidence, to 29% for conditional recommendations with very low-quality evidence. Data showed 13/19 (68%) recommendations would have met proposed targets and 10/19 (53%) had ≥80% observed adherence. Exceptions were the use of subcutaneous over oral methotrexate (MTX) (53%) and infrequent treatment escalation from NSAIDs to biologic DMARDs in patients with sacroiliitis (31%) or enthesitis (0%). By 12 weeks, 95% of patients with polyarthritis received synthetic DMARD, 38% of patients with systemic JIA received biologic DMARD, and 22% of patients with sacroiliitis received biologic DMARD.

CONCLUSION

Canadian pediatric rheumatology practices were in line with many 2019 JIA Guidelines recommendations before their publication, except for frequent use of oral methotrexate and infrequent direct escalation from NSAIDs to biologic DMARDs in sacroiliitis and enthesitis.

Quality improvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a mixed-methods implementation pilot of the CAPTURE-JIA dataset

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) do not achieve inactive disease during the first two years following diagnosis. Refinements to clinical care pathways have the potential to improve clinical outcomes but a lack of consistent and contemporaneous clinical data presently precludes standard setting and implementation of meaningful quality improvement programmes. This study was the first to pilot clinical data collection and analysis using the CAPTURE-JIA dataset, and to explore patient and clinician-reported feasibility and acceptability data.

METHODS

A multiphase mixed-methods approach enabled prospective collection of quantitative data to examine the feasibility and efficacy of dataset collection and of qualitative data informing the context and processes of implementation. An initial paper pilot informed the design of a bespoke electronic data collection system (the Agileware system), with a subsequent electronic pilot informing the final CAPTURE-JIA data collection tool.

RESULTS

Paper collection of patient data was feasible but time-consuming in the clinical setting. Phase 1 paper pilot data (121 patients) identified three themes: problematic data items (14/62 data items received >40% missing data), formatting of data collection forms and a clinician-highlighted need for digital data collection, informing Phase 2 electronic data collection tool development. Patients and families were universally supportive of the collection and analysis of anonymised patient data to inform clinical care. No apparent preference for paper / electronic data collection was reported by families. Phase 3 electronic pilot data (38 patients) appeared complete and the system reported to be easy to use. Analysis of the study dataset and a dummy longitudinal dataset confirmed that all eleven JIA national audit questions can be answered using the electronic system.

CONCLUSIONS

Multicentre CAPTURE-JIA data collection is feasible and acceptable, with a bespoke data collection system highlighted as the most satisfactory solution. The study is informing ongoing work towards a streamlined and flexible national paediatric data collection system to drive quality improvement in clinical care.

Real-world data reveals the complexity of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment patterns in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacological treatment is a cornerstone of care for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The objective of this study is to evaluate prescription patterns of conventional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs) for patients with JIA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children diagnosed with JIA at a rheumatology pediatric clinic. Eligibility criteria were defined as children and youth newly diagnosed with enthesis-related arthritis, polyarticular, or oligoarticular JIA between 2011 and 2019, with at least one year of observation. Data on c-DMARDs and b-DMARDs prescriptions were obtained from electronic medical charts. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival methods, and Sankey diagrams to describe treatment prescription patterns.

RESULTS

A total of 325 patients with JIA were included, with a median observation time of 3.7 years. The most frequently prescribed c-DMARD and b-DMARD were methotrexate and etanercept, respectively. Within the first year of rheumatology care, 62% and 21% of patients had a c-DMARD and a b-DMARD prescribed, respectively. These proportions varied greatly by JIA subtype. Among the 147 (147/325, 45%) patients that had at least one b-DMARD prescribed, 24% were prescribed a second, and 7% a third-line of b-DMARD. A total of 112 unique treatment sequences were observed, with c-DMARD monotherapy followed by the addition of either a b-DMARD (56%) or another c-DMARD (30%) being the two most prevalent patterns in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

We observed a variety of treatment trajectories, with many patients experiencing multiple treatment lines, illustrating the complexity of the overall JIA treatment path.

Psychiatric comorbidity in childhood onset immune-mediated diseases-A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To estimate psychiatric comorbidity in childhood onset immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID).

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the protocol was registered at Prospero (ID: CRD42021233890). Literature was searched in PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase. Original papers on prevalence rates of diagnosed psychiatric disorders and/or suicide in paediatric onset inflammatory bowel disease (pIBD), rheumatic diseases (RD) and autoimmune liver diseases were selected. Pooled prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders (grouped according to ICD-10 criteria) within the various IMID were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included; 13 describing psychiatric disorders in pIBD and 10 in RD. Anxiety and mood disorders were mostly investigated with pooled prevalence rates in pIBD of 6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4%-9%) and 4% (95%CI: 2%-8%), respectively, in register-based studies, and 33% (95%CI: 25%-41%) and 18% (95%CI: 12%-26%), respectively, in studies using psychiatric assessment. In RD, rates were 13% (95%CI: 12%-15%) for anxiety disorders and 20% (95%CI: 15%-26%) for mood disorders based on psychiatric assessment.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depression are commonly reported in childhood onset IMID. Physicians should be attentive to mental health problems in these patients as they seem overlooked.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Presentation and Research Recruitment: Results from the CAPRI Registry

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted healthcare delivery and clinical research worldwide, with data from areas most affected demonstrating an impact on rheumatology care. This study aimed to characterize the impact of the pandemic on the initial presentation of JIA and JIA-related research in Canada.

METHODS

Data collected from the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators JIA Registry from the year pre-pandemic (March 11, 2019-March 10, 2020) was compared with data collected during the first year of the pandemic (March 11, 2020-March 10, 2021). Outcomes included time from symptom onset to first assessment, disease severity at presentation and registry recruitment. Proportions and medians were used to describe categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

The median time from symptom onset to first assessment was 138 days (IQR 64-365) pre-pandemic vs 146 days (IQR 83-359) during the pandemic. The JIA category frequencies remained overall stable, (44% oligoarticular JIA pre-pandemic, 46.8% pandemic), except for systemic JIA (12 cases pre-pandemic, 1 pandemic). Clinical features, disease activity (cJADAS10), disability (CHAQ) and quality of life (JAQQ) scores were similar between the two cohorts. Pre-pandemic, 225 patients were enrolled, compared with 111 in the pandemic year, with the greatest decrease from March to June 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe the anticipated delay in time to presentation or increased severity at presentation, suggesting that, within Canada, care adapted well to provide support to new patient consults without negative impacts. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an initial 50% decrease in registry enrolment but has since improved.

Addressing Healthcare Quality in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis With a Universal Access Program

In this issue of The Journal of Rheumatology, Concha, et al ¹ describe the effects of the implementation, in 2010, of a national, legally mandated universal access program (Explicit Health Guarantees [GES]) for guaranteed juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA) diagnosis and treatment in Chile. The GES program guarantees that evaluation by a specialist takes place less than 30 days after referral from primary care, and that treatment must start no later than 7 days after confirmation of diagnosis.

Update on the treatment of nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis including treatment-to-target: is (drug-free) inactive disease already possible?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review concerns the outcome for nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with emphasis on treatment-to-target (T2T) and treatment strategies aiming at inactive disease by giving an overview of recent articles.

RECENT FINDINGS

More efficacious therapies and treatment strategies/T2T with inactive disease as target, have improved the outcome for JIA significantly. Recent studies regarding treatment strategies have shown 47-68% inactive disease after 1 year. Moreover, probability of attaining inactive disease at least once in the first year seems even higher in recent cohort-studies, reaching 80%, although these studies included relatively high numbers of oligoarticular JIA patients. However, 26-76% of patients flare upon therapy withdrawal and prediction of flares is still difficult.

SUMMARY

Remission can be achieved and sustained in (some) JIA patients, regardless of initial treatment. Cornerstone principles in the management of nonsystemic JIA treatment are early start of DMARD therapy, striving for inactive disease and T2T by close and repeated monitoring of disease activity. T2T and tight control appear to be more important than a specific drug in JIA. Next to inactive disease, it is important that patients/parents are involved in personal targets, like reduction of pain and fatigue. Future studies should focus on predictors (based on imaging-methods or biomarkers) for sustained drug-free remission and flare.

Parent-Reported Medication Side-Effects and Their Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To describe frequency and severity of parent-reported medication side effects (SE) in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA), relative to physician-reported actionable adverse events (AAE); and to assess their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

Newly diagnosed JIA patients recruited between 2017 and 2019 to the Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators (CAPRI) Registry were included. Parents reported presence and severity (0=no problem, 10=very severe) of medication SE at every clinic visit. Physicians were asked to report any AAE. HRQoL was assessed using the Quality of My Life (QoML) questionnaire (0=the worst, 10=the best) and parent's global assessment (0=very well, 10=very poor). Analyses included proportion of visits with SE or AAE, cumulative incidence by Kaplan-Meier methods, and HRQoL impact measured with longitudinal mixed effects models.

RESULTS

SE were reported at 371/884 (42%) visits (95% CI 39-45%) in 249 patients with a median of 2 SE per visit (IQR 1,3), and median severity of 3 (IQR 1.5,5). Most SE were gastrointestinal (32.5% of visits) or behavioral/psychiatric (22.4%). SE frequency was lowest with NSAID alone (34.7%) and highest with prednisone and methotrexate combinations (66%). SE cumulative incidence was 67% (95% CI 59-75) within 1y of diagnosis, and 36% (95% CI 28-44) for AAE. Parent global and QoML scores were worse with SE present, the impact persisted after adjusting for pain and number of active joints.

CONCLUSION

Parents report 2/3 children with JIA experience SE impacting their HRQoL within 1y of diagnosis. SE mitigation strategies are needed in managing JIA.

Prediction of inactive disease and relapse in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe clinical features of patients with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who achieved inactive disease at 3rd month and also to determine the predictors of relapse and extended course.

METHODS

In the cohort study, 88 patients with oligoarticular JIA were retrospectively analyzed. The demographic data, clinical features, medications, relapse rates were recorded. Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) and American College of Rheumatology Pediatric criteria were used to measure disease activity and treatment response at 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (67%) patients were females and the mean age at diagnosis was 7.9 ± 4.3 years. The odds of achieving inactive disease (JADAS ≤1) at 3rd month were increased by a lower JADAS27 score at admission. Forty-one (48.8%) of 84 patients relapsed. Ankle involvement at onset, high JADAS27 score at admission, increased ESR at admission and presence of synovial hypertrophy in imaging were risk factors for occurrence of relapse.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that a significant proportion of oligoarticular JIA patients relapse after inactive period. JADAS is a useful tool to guide the treatment decisions of patients who may be at risk of high disease activity and relapse.