Secukinumab and ustekinumab treatment in psoriatic arthritis: results of a direct comparison

Signaling pathways and targeted therapies for psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common, chronic, and inflammatory skin disease with a high burden on individuals, health systems, and society worldwide. With the immunological pathologies and pathogenesis of psoriasis becoming gradually revealed, the therapeutic approaches for this disease have gained revolutionary progress. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of less common forms of psoriasis remain elusive. Furthermore, severe adverse effects and the recurrence of disease upon treatment cessation should be noted and addressed during the treatment, which, however, has been rarely explored with the integration of preliminary findings. Therefore, it is crucial to have a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms behind psoriasis pathogenesis, which might offer new insights for research and lead to more substantive progress in therapeutic approaches and expand clinical options for psoriasis treatment. In this review, we looked to briefly introduce the epidemiology, clinical subtypes, pathophysiology, and comorbidities of psoriasis and systematically discuss the signaling pathways involving extracellular cytokines and intracellular transmission, as well as the cross-talk between them. In the discussion, we also paid more attention to the potential metabolic and epigenetic mechanisms of psoriasis and the molecular mechanistic cascades related to its comorbidities. This review also outlined current treatment for psoriasis, especially targeted therapies and novel therapeutic strategies, as well as the potential mechanism of disease recurrence.

Uptake and effectiveness of newer biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in psoriatic arthritis: results from five Nordic biologics registries

BACKGROUND

We aimed to describe the uptake of newer biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the Nordic countries and to compare their retention and effectiveness.

METHODS

Patients with PsA starting a b/tsDMARD in 2012-2020 in five Nordic rheumatology registers were included. Uptake and patient characteristics were described, with comorbidities identified from linkages to national patient registries. One-year retention and 6-month effectiveness (proportions achieving low disease activity (LDA) on the Disease Activity Index for PSoriatic Arthritis based on 28-joint evaluation) for the newer b/tsDMARDs (abatacept/apremilast/ixekizumab/secukinumab/tofacitinib/ustekinumab) were compared with adalimumab through adjusted regression models stratified by treatment course (first, second/third, and fourth or more).

RESULTS

In total, 5659 treatment courses with adalimumab (56% biologic-naïve) and 4767 courses with a newer b/tsDMARD (21% biologic-naïve) were included. The uptake of newer b/tsDMARDs increased from 2014 and plateaued in 2018. Patient characteristics appeared similar across treatments at treatment start. Adalimumab was more often used as the first course and newer b/tsDMARDs more often in biologic-experienced patients. Used as a second/third b/tsDMARD, the retention rate and the proportion achieving LDA were significantly better for adalimumab (rate 65%, proportion 59%) compared with abatacept (45%, 37%), apremilast (43%, 35%), ixekizumab (LDA only, 40%) and ustekinumab (LDA only, 40%), but not significantly different from other b/tsDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

Uptake of newer b/tsDMARDs occurred mainly in biologic-experienced patients. Regardless of mode of action, only a minority of patients starting a second or later b/tsDMARD course remained on drug and achieved LDA. Superior outcomes for adalimumab indicate that the positioning of newer b/tsDMARDs in the PsA treatment algorithm remains to be established.

English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version)

This is the English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version). As the first biologics for psoriasis in Japan, infliximab and adalimumab, anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibodies, became available in the field of dermatology in 2010, followed by ustekinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 antibody, which was launched in Japan in 2011. Moreover, after 2015, three IL-17 inhibitors, the IL-17A antibody preparations secukinumab and ixekizumab, and an anti-IL-17 receptor antibody preparation brodalumab were marketed. Furthermore, after 2018, the anti-IL23p19 antibody preparations guselkumab and risankizumab, the TNF inhibitor certolizumab pegol, the IL-23 inhibitor tildrakizumab, and the anti-IL-17A/F antibody bimekizumab were marketed. It is important for physicians to select appropriate biologic therapy for each psoriatic patient after due consideration of disease factors, treatment factors, and patient background factors, sharing such information with patients. The followings can be listed as points to be considered for the selection of biologics: drug effects (e.g., strength of effectiveness, time to onset of effectiveness, effectiveness against arthritis, primary failure, secondary failure), safety (e.g., infections, administration-related reactions, and relationships with other comorbidities), convenience for patients (e.g., hospital visit intervals, self-injection, maintenance therapy at clinics, feasibility of drug discontinuation/re-administration), and payment (medical costs) borne by patients. This guidance has been prepared with the aim of allowing dermatologists experienced in the treatment of psoriasis to use biologics appropriately according to the circumstances of individual patients after consideration of the above-mentioned factors.

Long-term persistence of second-line biologics in psoriatic arthritis patients with prior TNF inhibitor exposure: a nationwide cohort study from the French health insurance database (SNDS)

INTRODUCTION

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) agents are most often the first-choice biological treatment for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). When their discontinuation is needed, a switch to another TNFi or to another therapeutic class may be considered. However, data supporting one approach over another are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term persistence of classes of biologics in PsA patients with prior TNFi exposure.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database. We included all adults with PsA starting a second-line biological after discontinuing a TNFi during 2015-2020. Persistence was defined as the time from biological initiation to discontinuation and was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of persistence by biological class was performed with Poisson regression models with time divided into 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

We included 2975 patients: 1580 (53%) initiating a second TNFi, 426 (14%) an interleukin 12/23 inhibitor (IL-12/23i) and 969 (33%) an IL-17 inhibitor (IL-17i). Overall, 1-year and 3-year persistence rates were 42% and 17%, respectively. After adjustment, persistence was associated with treatment with an IL-17i (adjusted relative risk (RR_a) 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.87) or IL-12/23i (RR_a 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79) vs a TNFi, with no significant difference between IL-12/23 and IL-17 inhibitors (RR_a 0.88, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this real-life study shows low persistence for all biologics at 3 years in PsA patients previously exposed to a TNFi. However, persistence was higher with an IL-17i or IL-12/23i than a TNFi.

Long-term Persistence of First-line Biologics for Patients With Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis in the French Health Insurance Database

Importance

Treatment options for psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have evolved significantly throughout the era of biologics. Clinical trials are inadequate to assess the relative long-term efficacy of biologics and are often insufficient regarding safety.

Objectives

To assess the long-term persistence of different biologic classes to treat PsO and PsA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative health care database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database. All adults with PsO and PsA who were new users of biologics (not in the year before the index date) from January 1, 2015, to May 31, 2019, were included and followed up through December 31, 2019. Patients hospitalized for PsA in the PsO cohort and for PsO in the PsA cohort in the year before the index date were excluded. Data were analyzed from June 1 to October 31, 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Persistence was defined as the time from biologic therapy initiation to discontinuation and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of persistence by biologic class involved using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models and adjustment on specific systemic nonbiologics (time-dependent variables).

Results

A total of 16 892 patients with PsO were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 48.5 [13.8] years; 9152 men [54.2%] men). Of these, 10 199 patients (60.4%) started therapy with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor; 3982 (23.6%), with an interleukin 12 and interleukin 23 (IL-12/23) inhibitor; and 2711 (16.0%), with an interleukin 17 (IL-17) inhibitor. An additional 6531 patients with PsA (mean [SD] age, 49.1 [12.8] years; 3565 [54.6%] women) were included; of these, 4974 (76.2%) started therapy with a TNF inhibitor; 803 (12.3%), with an IL-12/23 inhibitor; and 754 (11.5%), with an IL-17 inhibitor. Overall 3-year persistence rates were 40.9% and 36.2% for PsO and PsA, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting and adjustment, the IL-17 inhibitor was associated with higher persistence compared with the TNF inhibitor for PsO (weighted hazard ratio [HR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.83]) and PsA (weighted HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.58-0.85]) and compared with the IL-12/23 inhibitor for PsA (weighted HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.55-0.87]). No difference between the IL-17 inhibitor and IL-12/23 inhibitor for PsO was noted. The IL-12/23 inhibitor was associated with higher persistence than the TNF inhibitor for PsO (weighted HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.72-0.80]), with no difference observed for PsA.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that IL-17 inhibitors are associated with higher treatment persistence than the TNF inhibitor for PsO and PsA. Interleukin 17 inhibitors were also associated with higher persistence than the IL-12/23 inhibitor for PsA, with no difference for PsO. However, the persistence rates of all biologics remained globally low at 3 years.

2022 French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations on the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Update the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) recommendations on the everyday management of patients with spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis.

METHODS

Following standardized procedures, a systematic literature review was done by four supervised rheumatology residents based on questions defined by a task force of 16 attending rheumatologists. The findings were reviewed during three working meetings that culminated in each recommendation receiving a grade and the level of agreement among experts being determined.

RESULTS

Five general principles and 15 recommendations were developed. They take into account pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures along with treatment methods based on the dominant phenotype present (axial, articular, enthesitis/dactylitis) and the extra-articular manifestations (psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, uveitis). NSAIDs are the first-line pharmacological treatment in the various presentations. Conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are not indicated in the axial and isolated entheseal forms. If the response to conventional treatment is not adequate, targeted therapies (biologics, synthetics) should be considered; the indications depend on the clinical phenotype and presence of extra-articular manifestations.

CONCLUSION

This update incorporates recent data (published since the prior update in 2018) and the predominant clinical phenotype concept. It aims to help physicians with the everyday management of patients affected by spondyloarthritis, including psoriatic arthritis.

New-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Among IL-17 inhibitors-Treated Patients: Results From The Case-Control MISSIL Study

OBJECTIVES

To describe new-onset inflammatory bowel diseases (new IBD) in patients treated with interleukin 17 inhibitors (IL-17i), to assess their incidence and to identify their risk factors in real life.

METHODS

A French national registry (MISSIL) aimed to report all cases of new IBD in patients treated with IL-17i from January 2016 to December 2019. Using the estimated number of patients treated by IL-17 in France during the study period, the annual incidence rates of new IBD was reported in IL-17i-treated patients. A case-control study was performed with two controls per new IBD case matched by gender, age and underlying inflammatory disease.

RESULTS

31 cases of new IBD under IL-17i were collected: 27 patients treated for spondyloarthritis and 4 patients for psoriasis. All were observed with secukinumab (SEK). The median time to onset of new IBD symptoms was 4.0 (1.5-7.5) months. SEK was discontinued in all patients. The evolution was favourable with complete resolution (17/31), improvement (7/31) or stabilization (5/31). 2 patients died: one due to a massive myocardial infarction and one due to post-colectomy complications. The incidence of new IBD decreased from 0.69/100 PY (7/1010) in 2016, to 0.08/100PY (6/7951) in 2019. No previous treatment with etanercept (OR = 0.33, IC95% 0.14-0.80, p= 0.014) and low number of previous biological therapies (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.47-0.94, p= 0.021) were significantly associated with new IBD.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of new IBD was low and decreased from 2016 to 2019. The outcome was favourable in 24 out of 31 patients, but two patients died.

Out of the shadow of interleukin-17A: the role of interleukin-17F and other interleukin-17 family cytokines in spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The last decade has witnessed tremendous advances in revealing an important role for the interleukin (IL)-17 cytokine family in the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis (SpA). Although most attention has been focused on IL-17A, a potential role of other IL-17 family members in inflammation and tissue remodelling is emerging. Herein, I review recent studies covering the role of IL-17B-F cytokines in the pathogenesis of SpA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies provided new insights into the cellular source, regulation and function of IL-17F. IL-17F/IL-17A expression ratio is higher in psoriatic skin compared to SpA synovitis. IL-17F-expressing T cells produce different proinflammatory mediators than IL-17A-expressing cells, and IL-17F and IL-17A signal through different receptor complex. Dual IL-17A and IL-17F neutralization resulted in greater suppression of downstream inflammatory and tissue remodelling responses. Furthermore, there is additional evidence of IL-23-independent IL-17 production. In contrast to IL-17A, IL-17F and IL-17C, which play proinflammatory roles in skin and joint inflammation, an anti-inflammatory function is proposed for IL-17D. An increase in IL-17E is associated with subclinical gut microbiome alterations after anti-IL-17A therapy in SpA patients.

SUMMARY

IL-17 family cytokines may act as agonists or antagonists to IL-17A contributing in concert to local inflammatory responses. Understanding their function and identifying their cellular sources, and molecular mechanisms driving their expression will be the key to designing rational therapies in SpA.

Long-term survival of biological therapy in psoriatic arthritis: 18-year analysis of a cohort in a tertiary hospital

To study retention of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or apremilast and potential predictors of lack of response in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A single-center retrospective analysis of PsA patients who received  ≥  1 bDMARD or apremilast during 2000-2018. The main endpoint was lack of response (primary or secondary failure). Analyses included retention of DMARDs (Kaplan-Meier curves) and potential predictors of lack of response (bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models). A total of 159 patients with PsA received up to 8 DMARDs: etanercept (34%), adalimumab (30%), infliximab (9%), golimumab (9%), apremilast (7%), ustekinumab (5%), certolizumab (4%), and secukinumab (2%). Therapy was discontinued in 96 cases (60%), mainly owing to secondary failure (37%), followed by primary failure (25%) and adverse effects (24%). Retention was analyzed based on 313 units of analysis. Duration of follow-up was 846.1 treatment-years (maximum 14.8 years, median 2.75 years). A total of 172 DMARDs were discontinued. The probability of continuing the initial treatment was 37% at 5 years, 22% at 10 years, and 12% at 14 years. The longest medium retention time was observed for infliximab (6.2 years) and etanercept (4.5 years). Predictors of lack of response included male sex, number of swollen joints, and, especially, depression (OR  =  35.2). The sensitivity and specificity of the model were 86.4% and 85.7%, respectively, with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 45.6 (ROC, 0.912). Rates of discontinuation due to primary and secondary failure are high in PsA. Retention is better for anti-TNF agents than for other agents.

Secukinumab: A Review in Psoriatic Arthritis

Secukinumab (Cosentyx^®) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, a proinflammatory cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Administered subcutaneously, the first-in-class anti-IL-17 agent is approved in numerous countries worldwide for the treatment of adults with active PsA. In the phase III FUTURE trials, secukinumab 150 or 300 mg improved the clinical signs and symptoms of PsA versus placebo in patients with active disease despite previous treatment with NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and/or tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). The benefits of secukinumab were seen regardless of whether or not patients had received previous TNFi therapy, and were maintained during longer term (up to 5 years) treatment. In FUTURE 1 and 5, secukinumab inhibited structural joint damage and was associated with sustained low rates of radiographic progression through 1-3 years of treatment. Treatment with secukinumab improved physical function and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and was generally well tolerated, both in the short- and longer-term. In the head-to-head EXCEED trial, secukinumab did not quite attain statistical significance for superiority versus adalimumab in the joint domain. In conclusion, secukinumab is effective across all key PsA domains and is generally well tolerated, and thus represents a useful treatment alternative to TNFi and other bDMARDs in adult patients with active PsA.