Risk of Diverticulitis and Gastrointestinal Perforation in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Tocilizumab Compared to Rituximab or Abatacept

A Systematic Overview of Contraindications and Special Warnings for Biologic and Targeted Synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Establishing a Framework to Create a "Safety Checklist"

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the contraindications, special warnings, and boxed warnings with the aim to establish a framework to create a prescription safety checklist for a class of drugs or disease indication. This study covers biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs).

METHODS

We identified contraindications, boxed warnings, and special warnings provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study included b/tsDMARDs approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) within the drug-classes anti-CD20, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-1 inhibitors (IL-1i), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA) 4, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri), Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE4i), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and interleukin-23 inhibitors (IL-23i).

RESULTS

All drug classes, except PDE4i, had contraindications and/or warnings related to infections, including tuberculosis. A warning about herpes zoster was listed for anti-CD20, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi, while a warning about hepatitis reactivation was listed for anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, CTLA4-Ig, IL-6Ri, and JAKi. Malignancy risk was mentioned for all drug classes except PDE4i, IL-17i, and IL-23i. Other warnings included demyelinating disease (TNFi, CTLA4-Ig, and IL-6Ri), heart failure (anti-CD20 and TNFi), major adverse cardiac events (JAKi and IL-12/23) and venous thromboembolism (JAKi), hyperlipidemia (IL-6Ri and JAKi), liver impairment (TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, and JAKi), kidney impairment (IL-1i, JAKi, and PDE4i), inflammatory bowel disease (IL-17i), gastrointestinal perforation (IL-6Ri, JAKi), cytopenia (anti-CD20, TNFi, IL-1i, IL-6Ri, JAKi), and depression (PDE4i). Contraindications and warnings appeared to increase with the passage of time since the drug's approval.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview to establish the framework to create an easily accessible and actionable prescription safety checklist from individual medical product prescription information provided by regulatory medical authorities.

Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis from retroperitoneal panniculitis during the treatment with anti-IL-6 receptor antibody: A case report

A 53-year-old man with adult-onset Still's disease developed severe streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS) due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (SDSE), following retroperitoneal panniculitis. He was receiving tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor. The modifying effect of TCZ on the immune response and the pathophysiology of SDSE infection may have led to retroperitoneal panniculitis and atypical STSS with delayed shock and flare of soft tissue inflammation.

Rational approach to the prescription of anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a product leaflet-based strategy in Italy

The treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has dramatically changed in the past 30 years. Currently, numerous conventional, biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs have been licensed and used following recommendations provided by international and national scientific societies. However, the availability of biosimilars and the increasing necessity of savings impacted on the local/national prescription of these drugs. The information provided by data sheet of every single drug is a decisive factor on the choice of a certain treatment merged with the patient's profile. Thus, our purpose was to construct a rational algorithm for the treatment strategy in RA according to costs and the product leaflet of the biologic and targeted-synthetic DMARDs currently licensed in Italy. We used the most recent available recommendations and then we performed a review of the literature considering all the factors that are known to influence drug safety/effectiveness. All these factors were considered in the context of the data sheets of currently available originators and biosimilars.

A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.

Targeted Therapies, Biologics, and Immunotherapy in the Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Settings: Perioperative Risks

Cancer therapeutics has been revolutionized by the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The paradigm of neoadjuvant therapy is commonly employed across multiple solid tumors, exhibiting significant clinical benefit as exemplified with ICIs in melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. However, neoadjuvant therapy can be associated with treatment-related adverse events. As the incorporation of these novel therapies in the preoperative space expands, it is crucial for surgical oncologists to understand the potential perioperative implications of these treatments. This article focuses on surgical considerations tied to these treatments, highlighting potential drug-surgery interactions and complications.

Selective immune suppression using interleukin-6 receptor inhibitors for management of immune-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

Management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is important as they cause treatment interruption or discontinuation, more often seen with combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety and effectiveness of anti-interleukin-6 receptor (anti-IL-6R) as therapy for irAEs.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter study evaluating patients diagnosed with de novo irAEs or flare of pre-existing autoimmune disease following ICI and were treated with anti-IL-6R. Our objectives were to assess the improvement of irAEs as well as the overall tumor response rate (ORR) before and after anti-IL-6R treatment.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 92 patients who received therapeutic anti-IL-6R antibodies (tocilizumab or sarilumab). Median age was 61 years, 63% were men, 69% received anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies alone, and 26% patients were treated with the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. Cancer types were primarily melanoma (46%), genitourinary cancer (35%), and lung cancer (8%). Indications for using anti-IL-6R antibodies included inflammatory arthritis (73%), hepatitis/cholangitis (7%), myositis/myocarditis/myasthenia gravis (5%), polymyalgia rheumatica (4%), and one patient each with autoimmune scleroderma, nephritis, colitis, pneumonitis and central nervous system vasculitis. Notably, 88% of patients had received corticosteroids, and 36% received other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as first-line therapies, but without adequate improvement. After initiation of anti-IL-6R (as first-line or post-corticosteroids and DMARDs), 73% of patients showed resolution or change to ≤grade 1 of irAEs after a median of 2.0 months from initiation of anti-IL-6R therapy. Six patients (7%) stopped anti-IL-6R due to adverse events. Of 70 evaluable patients by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) V.1.1 criteria; the ORR was 66% prior versus 66% after anti-IL-6R (95% CI, 54% to 77%), with 8% higher complete response rate. Of 34 evaluable patients with melanoma, the ORR was 56% prior and increased to 68% after anti-IL-6R (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Targeting IL-6R could be an effective approach to treat several irAE types without hindering antitumor immunity. This study supports ongoing clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6R antibody) in combination with ICIs (NCT04940299, NCT03999749).

Safety of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To perform a systematic literature review (SLR) concerning the safety of synthetic(s) and biological (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

SLR of observational studies comparing safety outcomes of any DMARD with another intervention in RA. A comparator group was required for inclusion. For treatments yet without, or limited, registry data, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were used.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine observational studies addressed the safety of DMARDs. Two studies (unclear risk of bias (RoB)) showed an increased risk of serious infections with bDMARDs compared with conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs. Herpes zoster infections occurred more with JAKi than csDMARDs (adjusted HR (aHR): 3.66) and bDMARDs (aHR: 1.9-2.3) (four studies, two low RoB). The risk of malignancies was similar across bDMARDs (five studies) and with tofacitinib compared with bDMARDs (one study, low RoB). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar with bDMARDs and tofacitinib (two studies, one low RoB). Thirty studies reported safety from RCTs, with one, designed to evaluate safety, showing that malignancies (HR (95% CI): 1.48 (1.04 to 2.09)) and MACE (HR (95% CI): 1.33 (0.91 to 1.94)) occurred numerically more frequently with tofacitinib (5 mg and 10 mg doses combined) than with TNFi in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. In this study, the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was higher with tofacitinib 10 mg than with TNFi.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of bDMARDs was further demonstrated. Whether the difference in incidence of malignancies, MACE and VTE between tofacitinib and TNFi applies to other JAKi needs further evaluation.

Comparison of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients' 2-Year Infliximab, Abatacept, and Tocilizumab Persistence Rates

Background: Drug persistence reflects an agent’s efficacy and safety in routine practice. This study was undertaken to compare the 2-year persistence rates of three biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to describe their efficacy and safety profiles. Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study included RA patients who had received at least one intravenous dose of infliximab, abatacept, and/or tocilizumab. Two-year drug persistence was estimated using the Kaplan−Meier method. Efficacy profiles were assessed as changes of Disease-Activity Score-28 (DAS28)-based EULAR-criteria responses. Results: The infliximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab groups included 40, 72, and 93 patients, respectively. Their respective 2-year persistence rates were similar: 55.0%, 45.8%, and 62.4%. Tocilizumab recipients benefited from greater improvement than those given infliximab (p = 0.0005) or abatacept (p < 0.0001). For all groups combined, 93.1% of patients obtained good or moderate EULAR responses. Conclusions: Even if this retrospective work includes different biases (lack of data, recruitment bias, etc.), it highlights that the 2-year persistence rates for infliximab, abatacept, and tocilizumab in daily practice did not differ significantly, thereby confirming the long-term efficacies of these three bDMARDs. However, tocilizumab was associated with more significant DAS28 improvement at 2 years than infliximab and abatacept.

Comparison of the risk of gastrointestinal perforation between patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis: A nationwide cohort study in Asia

Objectives

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may have an increased risk for gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) caused by medications or chronic inflammation. However, the risk of GIP between patients with and without RA remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to clarify it.

Methods

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified patients with and without RA matched at 1:1 ratio by age, sex, and index date between 2000 and 2013 for this study. Comparison of the risk of GIP between the two cohorts was performed by following up until 2014 using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

Results

In total, 11,666 patients with RA and an identical number of patients without RA were identified for this study. The mean age (±standard deviation) and female ratio were 55.3 (±15.2) years and 67.6% in both cohorts. Patients with RA had a trend of increased risk for GIP than patients without RA after adjusting for underlying comorbidities, medications, and monthly income [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99–2.04, p = 0.055]. Stratified analyses showed that the increased risk was significant in the female population (AHR 2.06; 95% CI 1.24–3.42, p = 0.005). Older age, malignancy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol abuse were independent predictors of GIP; however, NSAIDs, systemic steroids, and DMARDs were not.

Conclusion

RA may increase the risk of GIP, particularly in female patients. More attention should be paid in female population and those with independent predictors above for prevention of GIP.

Secondary Failure of Tocilizumab in Treating Elderly-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis With Systemic Symptoms Complicated by Diverticulum Perforation

The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has advanced from the use of steroids to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitors. Historically, steroids have been the mainstream in the clinical treatment of RA; however, the development of DMARDs has changed the RA treatment structure. In addition, biologics can alleviate RA symptoms. This case report describes the secondary failure of tocilizumab in treating RA with fatigue symptoms. Treatment with tocilizumab decreases C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, which may make detecting RA exacerbation difficult; therefore, obtaining the patient's precise history and thorough physical examinations are necessary. This case demonstrates the complexity of treating elderly-onset RA and reports practical methods for effective treatment.

Long term tolerability and clinical outcomes associated with tocilizumab in the treatment of refractory antibody mediated rejection (AMR) in pediatric renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are limited. Recent studies have shown that inhibition of interleukin-6 (IL-6)/interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) signaling can reduce inflammation and slow AMR progression.

METHODS

We report our experience using monthly tocilizumab (anti-IL6R) in 25 pediatric renal transplant recipients with AMR, refractory to IVIg/Rituximab. From January 2013 to June 2019, a median (IQR) of 12 (6.019.0) doses of tocilizumab were given per patient. Serial assessments of renal function, biopsy findings, and HLA DSA (by immunodominant HLA DSA [iDSA] and relative intensity score [RIS]) were performed.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) time from transplant to AMR was 41.4 (24.367.7) months, and time from AMR to first tocilizumab was 10.6 (8.317.6) months. At median (IQR) follow up of 15.8 (8.435.7) months post-tocilizumab initiation, renal function was stable except for 1 allograft loss. There was no significant decrease in iDSA or RIS. Follow up biopsies showed reduction in peritubular capillaritis (p = .015) and C4d scoring (p = .009). The most frequent adverse events were cytopenias.

CONCLUSIONS

Tocilizumab in pediatric patients with refractory AMR was well tolerated and appeared to stabilize renal function. The utility of tocilizumab in the treatment of AMR in this population should be further explored.

Development of severe colitis in Takayasu arteritis treated with tocilizumab

Relapse of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is frequent, and the use of biologics is required in refractory cases. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a biological agent used in TAK, is known to increase the incidence of diverticulitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Adverse events of TCZ in TAK have been poorly recognised. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of severe colitis among patients with TAK receiving TCZ. We enrolled 116 patients with TAK who met the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and visited our department between 2018 and 2020. The occurrence of severe colitis and its clinical characteristics were retrospectively evaluated. TCZ was introduced in 34 of 116 patients (29.3%). Severe colitis that required hospitalisation was observed in three of the 34 patients receiving TCZ (8.8%). All patients were female and had Numano type V artery lesions, and the ascending colon was commonly affected. Wide lesions that reached the sigmoid colon, colonic perforation, bacteraemia, or positive stool cultures were observed in some patients. All patients received antibiotics and intestinal rest, and TCZ was resumed in one patient. IL-6 plays a physiological role in the intestine, including recovery from ischaemic damage. In addition to infectious aetiology, blocking the physiological roles of IL-6 by TCZ is considered important for the development of colitis in TAK. Severe colitis is an important adverse event in patients with TAK who receive TCZ. The risk of bloodstream infection associated with colitis should be recognised, especially in patients who have undergone vascular surgery. Key Points • Severe colitis was observed in 8.8% of patients with TAK receiving tocilizumab • Patients had type V artery lesions and ascending colon involvement and were under long-term use of corticosteroids • Inhibition of the physiological roles of IL-6 in the intestinal tract might also be involved.