Treatment Patterns for End-Stage Kidney Failure in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematous

BACKGROUND

This study aims to examine the treatment patterns of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) among SLE patients and to compare the outcome of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

SLE patients identified from the national administration dataset in 2005-2021 were linked to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry to identify ESKD cases. The adjusted odds ratio of having PD instead of HD as the first treatment for ESKD for Asian, Māori, and Pacific compared with European/others was estimated with the logistic regression model. The adjusted hazards ratio of all-cause mortality for patients having PD first compared with HD first was calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred ten ESKD patients with SLE were identified. Two thirds (137/210) of the ESKD patients had HD as the first treatment, and one third (68, 32.4%) had PD first. Around 60% of Asian patients had PD as the first treatment, compared with 30% in other ethnic groups. The adjusted odds ratio of having PD as the first treatment for Asian patients compared with European/others was 3.00 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-7.73). The adjusted hazards ratio of all-cause mortality for patients in the PD group compared with the HD group was 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

Asian patients with ESKD were more likely to have PD as the first treatment. The optimal dialysis type for ESKD patients with SLE might be different from ESKD patients caused by other diseases. ESKD patients with SLE receiving PD first had superior outcomes than patients receiving HD first.

Comparison of mortality and its causes in patients with complicated systemic lupus erythematosus on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis is one of the most serious complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Ten percent to 20% of patients with SLE progress to end-stage renal disease and would require renal replacement therapy or renal transplantation. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare mortality and the causes of mortality in patients with complicated SLE who were treated on hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

Cochrane Central, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies that compared HD versus PD in patients with SLE. The RevMan software version 5.4 (RevMan software, Cochrane Collaborations, United Kingdom) was used to analyze data. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q and the I2 statistical tests. In this analysis, a random effects model was used during data assessment. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the results following analysis.

RESULTS

A total number of 3405 SLE participants were included in this analysis, whereby 2841 were assigned to HD and 564 participants were assigned to PD. In patients with SLE who were on dialysis, our analysis showed that the risk of mortality was similar with HD and PD (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; P = .10). When the cause of mortality was analyzed, cardiovascular death (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.31-1.31; P = .22), death due to infection (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47-1.17; P = .20), death due to a respiratory cause (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.18-6.21; P = .95), cause of death due to SLE flare up (RR, 2.54; 95% CI, 0.39-16.37; P = .33), and other causes of death (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.35-1.77; P = .57) were not significantly different with HD and PD.

CONCLUSION

This current analysis showed that in SLE patients who required dialysis, the risk of mortality between HD and PD was similar, and the causes of death including cardiovascular, infective, respiratory, SLE flare up, and other causes were not significantly different. Therefore, both dialysis methods were tolerable in these patients with SLE. Further studies with larger data would be required to confirm this hypothesis.

Incidence of Kidney Replacement Therapy and Subsequent Outcomes Among Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Findings From the ERA Registry

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

There is a dearth of data characterizing patients requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for kidney failure due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and their clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe trends in incidence and prevalence of KRT among these patients as well as to compare their outcomes to patients treated with KRT for diseases other than SLE.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study based on kidney registry data.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Patients recorded in 14 registries of patients receiving kidney replacement therapy that provided data to the European Renal Association (ERA) Registry between 1992 and 2016.

PREDICTOR

SLE as cause of kidney failure.

OUTCOMES

Incidence and prevalence of KRT, patient survival while receiving KRT, patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation, and specific causes of death.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were fit to compare patient survival between the SLE and non-SLE groups, overall KRT, dialysis and patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

In total, 1826 patients commenced KRT for kidney failure due to SLE, representing an incidence of 0.80 per million population (pmp) per year. The incidence remained stable during the study period (annual percent change=0.1 [95%CI: -0.6 ; 0.8]). Patient survival among patients with SLE receiving KRT was similar to survival within the comparator group (HR=1.11 [95%CI: 0.99-1.23]). After kidney transplantation, the risk of death was greater among patients with SLE than among patients within the comparator group (HR=1.25 [95%CI: 1.02-1.53]), while the risk of all-cause graft failure was similar (HR=1.09 [95%CI: 0.95-1.27]). Ten-year patient overall survival on KRT, and patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation improved over the study period (HR=0.71 [95%CI: 0.56-0.91], 0.43 [0.27-0.69] and 0.60 [0.43-0.84], respectively). Patients with SLE receiving KRT were significantly more likely to die from infections (24.8%) than patients in the comparator group (16.9%, p<0.001).

LIMITATIONS

No data were available on extrarenal manifestations of SLE, drug treatments, comorbidities, kidney transplant characteristics, or relapses of SLE.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients with SLE receiving KRT has improved over time. Survival of patients with SLE requiring KRT was similar when compared to patients requiring KRT due to other causes of kidney failure. Survival following kidney transplantation was worse among patients with SLE.

Combining C reactive protein and serum albumin to predict 90-day mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus with serious community-acquired infections

Objective

Serious infections in SLE are common and have emerged as the major cause of death. However, effective methods to identify poor prognosis are still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to determine the predictive value of C reactive protein (CRP) plus albumin (ALB) in SLE with serious infections.

Methods

From May 2015 to December 2018, consecutive patients with SLE presenting with serious infections in our emergency department were prospectively recruited. Serum CRP and ALB were measured within 24 hours of admission. The outcome was defined as mortality rate at 90 days. A CRP plus ALB score (2–6) was assigned based on the CRP and ALB concentrations. We performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses to detect the independent effects of CRP plus ALB on 90-day mortality (all-cause and infection-related). Subgroup analyses were used to show the effects stratified by lupus nephritis.

Results

A total of 150 patients were included, and the all-cause 90-day mortality rate was 38% (n=57), 41 of which was infection-related. The predominant infection sites were pulmonary (79.3%) and bloodstream infection (20.7%). Serum CRP and ALB levels were significantly different in non-surviving patients compared with those in surviving patients (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively). In the fully adjusted logistic regression model, the CRP plus ALB score was associated with decreased 90-day survival (adjusted OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.13; p=0.017).

Conclusions

CRP plus ALB was associated with the risk of all-cause and infection-related 90-day mortality in SLE with serious infections. Although this finding requires further verification, the two parameters may be useful for predicting poor outcomes in such patients.

Management of lupus nephritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2019 update of the joint EULAR and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations

Objectives

To analyse the current evidence for the management of lupus nephritis (LN) informing the 2019 update of the EULAR/European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association recommendations.

Methods

According to the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a PubMed systematic literature review was performed, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. Since this was an update of the 2012 recommendations, the final level of evidence (LoE) and grading of recommendations considered the total body of evidence, including literature prior to 2012.

Results

We identified 387 relevant articles. High-quality randomised evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for class III and class IV LN (LoE 1a), and moderate-level evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive treatment for pure class V LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria (LoE 2b). Treatment should aim for at least 25% reduction in proteinuria at 3 months, 50% at 6 months and complete renal response (<500–700 mg/day) at 12 months (LoE 2a-2b). High-quality evidence supports the use of mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (MMF/MPA) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) as initial treatment of active class III/IV LN (LoE 1a). Combination of tacrolimus with MMF/MPA and high-dose CY are alternatives in specific circumstances (LoE 1a). There is low-quality level evidence to guide optimal duration of immunosuppression in LN (LoE 3). In end-stage kidney disease, all methods of kidney replacement treatment can be used, with transplantation having the most favourable outcomes (LoE 2b).

Conclusions

There is high-quality evidence to guide the initial and subsequent phases of class III/IV LN treatment, but low-to-moderate quality evidence to guide treatment of class V LN, monitoring and optimal duration of immunosuppression.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Lupus Nephritis Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis: A Matched, Case-Control Study

The long-term clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) for patients with lupus nephritis (LN) have not been well researched. In the present study, we investigated the long-term prognosis of a Chinese PD cohort. This was a retrospective case-control study that included LN patients receiving PD treatment for more than 90 days from January 2006 to December 2012. Non-diabetic control patients were selected using a ratio of 1:2 for age- and gender-matching. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included technique failure and hospitalization rate. All patients were followed up to 31 December 2017. A total of 28 LN patients on PD (89.3% female, mean age 42.2±15.8 years) and 56 controls were included. After a median follow-up period of 53.1 months, 11 LN patients died. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 92.4%, 84.7%, and 67.6% in LN patients, and 100%, 93.5%, and 82.9% in the control group, respectively (p = 0.035). After adjusting for confounders, LN was not significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45 - 4.26); However, LN was still an independent risk factor of technique failure (HR: 2.87, 95% CI: 1.08 - 7.66). Meanwhile, the LN group had significantly higher hospitalization and infection rates. In conclusion, LN patients undergoing PD had poor patient survival and technique survival, and higher hospitalization and infection rates.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes comparison between different initial dialysis modalities in end-stage renal disease patients due to lupus nephritis prior to renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Regarding lupus disease activity, morbidity and survival, limited literature concluded conflicting results when comparing hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis as initial renal replacement therapies (RRT) prior to transplantation, in lupus nephritis end-stage renal disease (LN-ESRD) patients. This study was aimed to compare the risks of lupus flares, all-cause infections, all-cause cardiovascular events, and mortality, between hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis as initial RRT - modality before renal-transplant in LN-ESRD patients, by systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for observational-studies comparing LN-ESRD -patients undergoing hemodialysis (Group1) versus peritoneal-dialysis (Group 2) prior to renal-transplantation, by their risks of lupus flare, all-cause infections, all-cause cardiovascular events, and mortality as outcome measures. Relative-Risks of outcomes between the groups measured overall effects at a 95% significance level. RevMan 5.3 computer software was used for analysis.

RESULTS

From search, 16 eligible studies reported 15,636 LN-ESRD -patients prior to renal transplantation with 4616 patients on hemodialysis, 2089 on peritoneal dialysis, 280 directly underwent kidney transplantation, 8319 were eliminated with reasons and 332 participants' details were not reported. Hemodialysis group had higher risk of all-cause cardiovascular events, Relative-Risk = 1.44 (Confidence Interval:1.02, 2.04), p-Value< 0.05. With regards to risks for mortality, flare and all-cause infections, there were trends that were not statistically significant (p-Value> 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Except for all-cause cardiovascular events in which peritoneal dialysis is superior to hemodialysis offering better outcomes, both treatment modalities offer more or less similar clinical outcomes as effective initial choices of RRT in LN-ESRD patients prior to renal transplant.

THE PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019131600.

2019 Update of the Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

To update the 2012 EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

Following the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was performed. Members of a multidisciplinary Task Force voted independently on their level of agreeement with the formed statements.

RESULTS

The changes include recommendations for treatment targets, use of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and management of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The target of therapy is complete response (proteinuria <0.5-0.7 g/24 hours with (near-)normal glomerular filtration rate) by 12 months, but this can be extended in patients with baseline nephrotic-range proteinuria. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended with regular ophthalmological monitoring. In active proliferative LN, initial (induction) treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF 2-3 g/day or mycophenolic acid (MPA) at equivalent dose) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY; 500 mg × 6 biweekly doses), both combined with glucocorticoids (pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone, then oral prednisone 0.3-0.5 mg/kg/day) is recommended. MMF/CNI (especially tacrolimus) combination and high-dose CY are alternatives, for patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and adverse prognostic factors. Subsequent long-term maintenance treatment with MMF or azathioprine should follow, with no or low-dose (<7.5 mg/day) glucocorticoids. The choice of agent depends on the initial regimen and plans for pregnancy. In non-responding disease, switch of induction regimens or rituximab are recommended. In pure membranous LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria or proteinuria >1 g/24 hours despite renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade, MMF in combination with glucocorticoids is preferred. Assessment for kidney and extra-renal disease activity, and management of comorbidities is lifelong with repeat kidney biopsy in cases of incomplete response or nephritic flares. In ESKD, transplantation is the preferred kidney replacement option with immunosuppression guided by transplant protocols and/or extra-renal manifestations. Treatment of LN in children follows the same principles as adult disease.

CONCLUSIONS

We have updated the EULAR recommendations for the management of LN to facilitate homogenization of patient care.

Deep Neck Infection in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: Real-World Evidence

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) might increase deep neck infection (DNI) risk, but evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited. In this retrospective follow-up study, the SLE-DNI association was investigated using data from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patients, which is a subset of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. All patients newly diagnosed as having SLE in 1997-2011 were identified, and every SLE patient was individually matched to four patients without SLE according to sex, age, and socioeconomic status. The study outcome was DNI occurrence. DNI treatment modalities and prognoses in SLE and non-SLE patients, along with the association of steroid dose with DNI risk, were also studied. In total, 17,426 SLE and 69,704 non-SLE patients were enrolled. Cumulative DNI incidence was significantly higher in the SLE cohort than in the non-SLE cohort (p < 0.001). The Cox regression model demonstrated that SLE significantly increased DNI risk (hazard ratio: 4.70; 95% confidence interval: 3.50-6.32, p < 0.001). Moreover, in the sensitivity and subgroup analyses, the effect of SLE on DNI was stable. Relatively few SLE-DNI patients received surgical interventions (15.6% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.033). The between-group differences in tracheostomy use and hospitalisation duration were nonsignificant. In SLE patients, high steroid doses significantly increased DNI incidence (≥3 vs. <3 mg/day = 2.21% vs. 0.52%, p < 0.001). This is the first study demonstrating that SLE increases DNI risk by approximately five times and that high steroid dose increases DNI incidence in SLE patients.

ESKD, Transplantation, and Dialysis in Lupus Nephritis

Kidney disease resulting from systemic lupus erythematosus accounts for 1.9% of the end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) population in the United States. Systemic lupus erythematosus patients with lupus nephritis (LN) who progress to ESKD in the United States are mostly female (81%) and of African ancestry (49%), with a mean age of 41 years at initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT). The incidence of ESKD in patients with LN steadily increased between 1982 and 1998 because RRT was offered more readily to LN patients in the United States. However, it appears to have plateaued in the early 2000s, and recently decreased, with approximately 3.26 incident cases per million patient-years during the biennium period of 2009 to 2010. When LN patients approach ESKD, patients and providers must choose among the RRT options available. The trend of the RRT used to support LN ESKD patients is not guided by the lower mortality seen with the use of kidney transplantation compared with dialysis (>85% versus 73% survival during 5 years of follow-up evaluation, respectively). Less than 4% of LN ESKD patients have pre-emptive kidney transplantation. Although the survival of LN ESKD patients who begin with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are similar (77% versus 79% during 3 years of follow-up evaluation, respectively), more than 80% of patients begin with hemodialysis and less than 15% begin with peritoneal dialysis in the United States.

Long-term outcomes of end-stage kidney disease for patients with lupus nephritis

Patient outcomes in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) secondary to lupus nephritis have not been well described. To help define this we compared dialysis and transplant outcomes of patients with ESKD due to lupus nephritis to all other causes. All patients diagnosed with ESKD who commenced renal replacement therapy in Australia and New Zealand (1963-2012) were included. Clinical outcomes were evaluated in both a contemporary cohort (1998-2012) and the entire 50-year cohort. Of 64,160 included patients, 744 had lupus nephritis as the primary renal disease. For the contemporary cohort of 425 patients with lupus nephritis, the 5-year dialysis patient survival rate was 69%. Of 176 contemporary patients with lupus nephritis who received their first renal allograft, the 5-year patient, overall renal allograft, and death-censored renal allograft survival rates were 95%, 88%, and 93%, respectively. Patients with lupus nephritis had worse dialysis patient survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.33, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.58) and renal transplant patient survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.87, 95% confidence interval 1.18-2.98), but comparable overall renal allograft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.68) and death-censored renal allograft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.62) compared with ESKD controls. Similar results were found in the entire cohort and when using competing-risks analysis. Thus, the ESKD of lupus nephritis was associated with worse dialysis and transplant patient survival but comparable renal allograft survival compared with other causes of ESKD.

Differences in Initial Hemodialysis Vascular Access Use Among Glomerulonephritis Subtypes in the United States

BACKGROUND

The type of vascular access used for hemodialysis affects patient morbidity and mortality. Whether vascular access types differ by glomerulonephritis (GN) subtype in the US hemodialysis population has not been investigated.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We identified all adult (aged ≥ 18 years) patients within the US Renal Data System who initiated hemodialysis therapy from July 2005 through December 2011 with a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease attributed to any of 4 primary (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, immunoglobulin A nephropathy [reference group], membranous nephropathy, and membranoproliferative GN) or 2 secondary (lupus nephritis and vasculitis) GN subtypes.

PREDICTOR

GN subtype.

OUTCOMES

ORs with 95% CIs for arteriovenous fistula versus central venous catheter (CVC) use and for arteriovenous graft versus CVC use were computed using multinomial logistic regression, with adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, comorbidity, and duration of nephrology care covariates.

RESULTS

Among 29,015 patients, CVC use at initiation of hemodialysis therapy was substantially higher in patients with lupus nephritis (89.2%) or vasculitis (91.2%) compared with patients with primary GN subtypes (72.7%-79.8%). After adjustment and compared with patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, patients with lupus nephritis or vasculitis were as likely to have used an arteriovenous graft (ORs of 0.94 [95% CI, 0.70-1.27] and 0.80 [95% CI, 0.56-1.13], respectively) but significantly less likely to have used an arteriovenous fistula (ORs of 0.66 [95% CI, 0.57-0.76] and 0.54 [95% CI, 0.45-0.63], respectively), whereas patients with any comparator primary GN subtype were at least as likely to have used either of these 2 access types.

LIMITATIONS

Potential misclassification of exposure; residual confounding by unmeasured covariates; inability to determine causes of observed associations; lacking longitudinal data for vascular access use.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in vascular access distributions at initiation of hemodialysis therapy are apparent among GN subtypes. The unacceptably high use of CVCs in patients with lupus nephritis and vasculitis is particularly concerning. Further studies are needed to identify any potentially modifiable factors underlying these findings.

Differences in initial treatment modality for end-stage renal disease among glomerulonephritis subtypes in the USA

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), while peritoneal dialysis affords certain benefits over hemodialysis. Distributions and determinants of first ESRD treatment modality have not been compared across glomerulonephritis (GN) subtypes.

METHODS

We identified all adult (18-75 years) patients with ESRD attributed to any of six GN subtypes [focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), IgA nephropathy (IgAN), membranous nephropathy (MN), membranoproliferative GN (MPGN), lupus nephritis (LN) and vasculitis] who were first registered in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) between 1996 and 2011. We used multinomial logistic regression--adjusting for temporal, geographic, demographic, socioeconomic and comorbid factors--to determine odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for transplantation versus hemodialysis, and for peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis, comparing other GN subtypes to IgAN.

RESULTS

Among the 75 278 patients studied, patients with comparator GN subtypes were significantly less likely than those with IgAN to receive either transplantation or peritoneal dialysis. After adjusting for potentially confounding covariates, patients with comparator primary GN subtypes (FSGS, MN, MPGN) were at least as likely to receive transplantation [FSGS OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.93-1.15), MN OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.01-1.39), MPGN OR 1.08 (95% CI 0.93-1.26)] or peritoneal dialysis [FSGS OR 1.05 (95% CI 0.98-1.12), MN OR 1.30 (95% CI 1.18-1.43), MPGN OR 0.95 (95% CI 0.85-1.06)] as patients with IgAN. Conversely, patients with the secondary GN subtypes LN and vasculitis remained significantly less likely to receive either modality [transplantation OR 0.49 (95% CI 0.43-0.56) for LN and 0.27 (95% CI 0.22-0.34) for vasculitis, peritoneal dialysis OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82) for LN and 0.54 (95% CI 0.48-0.60) for vasculitis].

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in ESRD treatment practice patterns are apparent among GN subtypes. To ensure equitable care for all patients, regardless of GN subtype, reasons for observed disparities should be elucidated and-if appropriate-eliminated.

Risk factors for systemic lupus erythematosus flares in patients with end-stage renal disease: a case-control study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to recognize risk factors for extrarenal SLE flares in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, case-control study in a tertiary care hospital in Mexico City from 1993 to 2014. Cases were lupus patients who had any extrarenal flare after RRT. Controls were SLE patients with ESRD but without flares. We recorded demographic features and clinical and immunological parameters. Differences between groups were analysed by Student's t-test. Association was assessed by the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI. Multivariate analysis was performed by binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were included: 38 cases (50 flares) and 50 controls. The proportion of men was higher in cases (24 vs 8%, P = 0.029). The most common flares were haematologic (42%), mucocutaneous (38%) and articular (30%). Independent risk factors for flares included age at RRT start [OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.88, 0.96), P < 0.001], history of haematologic activity [OR 3.79 (95% CI 1.05, 13.7), P = 0.04], anti-cardiolipin IgM [OR 4.39 (95% CI 1.32, 14.6), P = 0.02] and low C4 levels [OR 9.7 (95% CI 2.49, 39.12), P = 0.001].

CONCLUSION

SLE patients continue to be at risk for extrarenal activity after RRT. The most common flare was haematologic, which correlated with the history of haematologic activity and anti-cardiolipin positivity as independent risk factors. Lower C4 levels and younger age at the beginning of RRT were also associated. Patients with these characteristics should have a closer follow-up in order to detect and treat SLE flares in a timely manner.

Patient characteristics and outcomes by GN subtype in ESRD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Outcomes-based research rarely focuses on patients with ESRD caused by GN. The hypotheses were that the GN subtype would clinically discriminate patient groups and independently associate with survival after ESRD therapy initiation.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Data were extracted from the US Renal Data System for adult patients with incident (1996-2011) ESRD attributed to six GN subtypes: FSGS, IgA nephropathy (IgAN), membranous nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomeruonephritis, lupus nephritis (LN), and vasculitis. ESRD attributed to diabetes and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease served as non-GN comparators. Unadjusted and adjusted mortality hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using Cox regression (reference, IgAN). Models sequentially adjusted for sociodemographic (model 2), comorbidity/laboratory (model 3), and ESRD treatment modality (model 4) variables.

RESULTS

Among 84,301 patients with ESRD attributed to GN, the median age ranged from 39 (LN) to 66 (vasculitis) years, male sex ranged from 18% (LN) to 68% (IgAN), and black race ranged from 7% (IgAN) to 49% (LN). Patients with IgAN had the fewest comorbidities and lowest use of hemodialysis (70.1%). After a median follow-up of 2.5 (interquartile range, 1.0-4.9) years, crude mortality was lowest in IgAN (3.7 deaths/100 person years). Compared to IgAN, adjusted mortality was highest in LN (model 4 aHR=1.75; 95% CI, 1.68 to 1.83) and in diabetes (aHR=1.73; 95% CI, 1.67 to 1.79), and was also higher in all other GN subtypes (membranous nephropathy: aHR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.29; FSGS: aHR=1.37; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.42; membranoproliferative GN: aHR=1.38; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.45; vasculitis: aHR=1.51; 95% CI, 1.45 to 1.58) and in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (aHR=1.22; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.27).

CONCLUSIONS

This study exposes substantial heterogeneity across GN subtypes at ESRD therapy initiation and identifies independent associations between GN subtype and post-ESRD mortality. These survival discrepancies warrant further study, and the utility of current research practice to group GN subtypes together when evaluating ESRD outcomes should be questioned.

Outcome of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus on chronic dialysis: an observational study of incident patients of the French National Registry 2002–2012

Objectives

The objective of this article is to describe the outcome (mortality, kidney transplantation) of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on chronic dialysis.

Methods

The overall and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and access to kidney transplantation were studied in all SLE patients incident on chronic dialysis in France between 2002 and 2012 (REIN registry). They were compared to age- and sex-matched patients with diabetic nephropathy and with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (PKD) on chronic dialysis.

Results

A total of 368 SLE patients were included in the national REIN registry between 2002 and 2012. Cumulative incidence of death was 16.9% at five years, with no difference between haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Independent risk factors of death were age, past history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and chronic respiratory insufficiency. At five years, CV and all-cause mortality in SLE patients were lower than in matched diabetic patients, but three-fold higher than in matched PKD patients. Access to the kidney transplant waiting list and to kidney transplantation was higher in SLE patients than in matched diabetic patients, but lower than in matched PKD patients.

Conclusions

SLE patients on chronic dialysis are a population at high risk of death influenced by CV burden and chronic respiratory failure, but not by the method of dialysis. Their outcome, in terms of mortality and access to kidney transplantation, is intermediate between diabetic patients and patients with PKD.

Systemic lupus erythematous and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis

Background: The prevalence of systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is increasing but data on clinical outcomes are scarce. Interestingly, data on technique failure and peritoneal-dialysis (PD)-related infections are rarer, despite SLE patients being considered at high risk for infections. The aim of our study is to compare clinical outcomes of SLE patients on PD in a large PD cohort. Methods: We conducted a nationwide prospective observational study from the BRAZPD II cohort. For this study we identified all patients on PD for greater than 90 days. Within that subset, all those with SLE as primary renal disease were matched with PD patients without SLE for comparison of clinical outcomes, namely: patient mortality, technique survival and time to first peritonitis, then were analyzed taking into account the presence of competing risks. Results: Out of a total of 9907 patients, we identified 102 SLE patients incident in PD and with more than 90 days on PD. After matching the groups consisted of 92 patients with SLE and 340 matched controls. Mean age was 46.9 ± 16.8 years, 77.3% were females and 58.1% were Caucasians. After adjustments SLE sub-hazard distribution ratio for mortality was 1.06 (CI 95% 0.55–2.05), for technique failure was 1.01 (CI 95% 0.54–1.91) and for time to first peritonitis episode was 1.40 (CI 95% 0.92–2.11). The probability for occurrence of competing risks in all three outcomes was similar between groups. Conclusion: PD therapy was shown to be a safe and equally successful therapy for SLE patients compared to matched non-SLE patients.

A possible link between ankylosing spondylitis and periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the link between AS and periodontitis.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched to identify eligible studies that were selected and reviewed independently by at least two authors.

RESULTS

Six case-control studies were included in the review. Study size ranged from 90 to 40 926 participants. The prevalence of periodontitis ranged from 38% to 88% in AS patients and from 26% to 71% in controls. As there was low-level heterogeneity (I(2) = 13%), using fixed effects analysis the overall pooled estimate of the odds ratios for periodontitis was 1.85 (95% CI 1.72, 1.98). There was no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSION

The results led to the need for a further large study with sufficient statistical power to detect the desired effect size, taking into account potential confounding factors and using validated measures of AS and periodontitis.

Comparison of mortality of ESRD patients with lupus by initial dialysis modality

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known regarding whether mortality among ESRD patients with SLE differs between those initiating with peritoneal dialysis (PD) versus hemodialysis (HD). This study compared the mortality risk of ESRD patients with SLE initiating with PD versus HD after matching their baseline sociodemographic and clinical factors.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Of 11,023 ESRD patients with SLE initiating dialysis with PD or HD between 1995 and 2006 with complete records in the US Renal Data System, 1352 pairs were matched on 13 predictors utilizing a predicted probability of group membership into the PD group using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular-related and infection-related mortality. Outcomes were compared between groups with survival statistics. The period of observation ended on December 31, 2009. The median follow-up was 3 years.

RESULTS

Matched pairs were predominantly women (86%) with a median age of 39 years. Matched pairs had a balance (P ≥ 0.05) of all baseline factors. Matched pairs had a similar risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 1.13]; mortality, 21.4% [290 to 1352] versus 22.5% [304 to 1352] for PD versus HD) within the first 3 years of observation. Matched pairs also had similar cardiovascular-related mortality (10.5% versus 9.5% for PD versus HD) and infection-related mortality (3% versus 4.4% for PD versus HD).

CONCLUSIONS

In ESRD patients with SLE, the mortality was similar among those initiating with PD versus HD after predictors were matched between groups.

Inhibition of PI3Kδ reduces kidney infiltration by macrophages and ameliorates systemic lupus in the mouse

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a human chronic inflammatory disease generated and maintained throughout life by autoreactive T and B cells. Class I phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) are heterodimers composed of a regulatory and a catalytic subunit that catalyze phosphoinositide-3,4,5-P3 formation and regulate cell survival, migration, and division. Activity of the PI3Kδ isoform is enhanced in human SLE patient PBLs. In this study, we analyzed the effect of inhibiting PI3Kδ in MRL/lpr mice, a model of human SLE. We found that PI3Kδ inhibition ameliorated lupus progression. Treatment of these mice with a PI3Kδ inhibitor reduced the excessive numbers of CD4(+) effector/memory cells and B cells. In addition, this treatment reduced serum TNF-α levels and the number of macrophages infiltrating the kidney. Expression of inactive PI3Kδ, but not deletion of the other hematopoietic isoform PI3Kγ, reduced the ability of macrophages to cross the basement membrane, a process required to infiltrate the kidney, explaining MRL/lpr mice improvement by pharmacologic inhibition of PI3Kδ. The observations that p110δ inhibitor prolonged mouse life span, reduced disease symptoms, and showed no obvious secondary effects indicates that PI3Kδ is a promising target for SLE.

The dialysis scenario in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Although prognosis of lupus nephritis has improved over time, a substantial amount of lupus patients still reach end-stage renal disease and require dialysis. Treatment of these patients can be challenging, since the disease poses a number of problems that can portend a poor prognosis, such as infections, lupus reactivations, vascular access thrombosis and cardiovascular complications. Consensus is lacking among investigators about the real incidence of these complications and related diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, the choice of the type of dialysis treatment and the overall prognosis are still a matter of debate. In this paper, we have reviewed the currently available literature in an attempt to answer the most controversial issues about the topic.

Improving outcomes in patients with lupus and end-stage renal disease

The development of lupus-related end-stage renal disease (ESRD) confers the highest mortality rates among individuals with lupus. Lupus-related ESRD is also associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates compared with non-lupus ESRD. We review the evidence that persistent lupus activity, hypercoagulability, and continuing immunosuppression may contribute to unfavorable outcomes in dialysis and renal transplantation among lupus patients. Robust epidemiologic studies are needed to develop individualized evidence-based approaches to treating lupus-related ESRD. In the meantime, managing lupus-related ESRD presents a significant challenge for clinicians and requires a team approach involving nephrologists and rheumatologists. Goals of therapy after developing ESRD should include continuing monitoring of lupus activity, minimizing corticosteroid exposure, and choosing the most appropriate renal replacement therapy based on patient's risk profile and quality-of-life considerations.