1
|
Shoop-Worrall SJW, Lythgoe H. Greater DMARD use, improved clinical but not patient-reported outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: what are we missing? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024; 63:SI110-SI111. [PMID: 38175746 PMCID: PMC11381682 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J W Shoop-Worrall
- Children and Young Person's Rheumatology Research Programme, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Hanna Lythgoe
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Douglas S, Foster HE, Southwood TR, Hyrich KL. Outcomes after anti-tumour necrosis factor originator to biosimilar switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the UK: a national cohort study. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2024; 6:e438-e446. [PMID: 38843858 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(24)00087-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For cost-saving purposes, children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are being switched (for non-medical reasons) from biological originators to biosimilars. Here, we aimed to investigate those who switched from an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) originator to a biosimilar, regarding drug survival and disease activity, compared with a matched cohort who continued the originator. METHODS This analysis included all patients in the UK JIA Biologics Register switching directly from an anti-TNF originator to a biosimilar of the same product. All patients were matched (age, sex, disease duration, calendar year of when patients started originator therapy, line of therapy, and International League of Associations for Rheumatology [ILAR] category) to patients continuing the originator. For those matched successfully, a Cox proportional hazard model assessed whether drug persistence differed between those who switched compared with those who continued the originator. Overall change in the 71-joint juvenile arthritis disease activity score and the proportion of patients with a clinically important worsening score (by ≥1·7 units) after 6 months was compared between cohorts. This analysis was designed to address a priority research area set by our patient partners. FINDINGS There were 224 children and young people with non-systemic JIA (139 [62%] were female, and 85 [38%] were male) identified as switching from a biological originator to a biosimilar of the same product from Jan 1, 2017, to July 7, 2023. 143 (64%) patients were originally on adalimumab, 56 (25%) on etanercept, and 25 (11%) on infliximab. Of these, 164 patients were matched successfully to those continuing the originator. There was no evidence that patients switching were more likely to stop treatment compared with those continuing the originator, with a hazard ratio of 1·46 (95% CI 0·93-2·30). Of the 51 patients in the biosimilar group who stopped treatment, 18 (35%) switched back to the originator (14 in the first year), 28 (55%) started a different biological drug, and five (10%) discontinued all treatment by the last follow-up. Of the 87 matched patients with available disease activity, there was no evidence that JADAS-71 worsened more after 6 months, with an odds ratio of 0·71 (95% CI 0·34-1·51; p=0·38). INTERPRETATION In this matched comparative effectiveness analysis, children and young people with JIA switched from originators to biosimilars. Disease activity was similar between patients switching compared with those continuing the originator. Three quarters of patients were still receiving their biosimilar after 1 year, with switching back to originator uncommon, at only 9% after 1 year, suggesting good tolerability of non-medical switching in this patient population. This information is reassuring to clinicians and patients regarding the effect of non-medical biological switching. FUNDING British Society for Rheumatology, Versus Arthritis, and National Institutes for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | | | - Michael W Beresford
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Life Course and Medical Specialities, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sharon Douglas
- Scottish Network for Arthritis in Children, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Population and Health Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | | | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Güngörer V, Çelikel E, Ekici Tekin Z, Polat MC, Öner N, Kurt T, Kaplan MM, Sezer M, Tekgöz N, Karagöl C, Coşkun S, Çelikel Acar B. Biological Agent Switching in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Tertiary Center Experience. J Clin Rheumatol 2023; 29:255-261. [PMID: 37068267 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to investigate the causes and outcomes of switching biological agents in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients using biological agents and compare the characteristics of patients whose biological agents are switched and those whose are not. METHODS This medical records review study was conducted with 128 patients who were diagnosed with JIA at our clinic between January 2009 and January 2022 and were receiving biologic agents. Factors affecting the biologic agent switching were investigated. RESULTS The JIA subtype with the most frequent switching in biological agents was systemic JIA (n = 13, 40.6%). Systemic JIA was followed by rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular JIA and persistent oligoarticular JIA with 5 patients (15.6%), extended oligoarticular JIA and enthesitis-related JIA with 3 patients (9.3%), rheumatoid factor-positive polyarticular JIA with 2 patients (6.2%), and undifferentiated JIA with 1 patient (3.1%). Among the patients, 32 (25%) patients had their biological agent switched once, and 5 (3.9%) had theirs switched twice. The most frequently used biological agent was etanercept (n = 76, 59.3%), whereas the most frequently observed cases of biological agent switching were from an anti-TNF agent to another anti-TNF agent (40.6%). The reason for switching was unresponsiveness to the agent in 22 patients (68.8%), adverse effects in 6 patients (18.7%), drug intolerance in 1 patient (3.1%), and other reasons in 3 patients (9.3%). CONCLUSIONS The most frequently used biological agent was etanercept; the most frequent cases of biological agents switching were from an anti-TNF agent to another anti-TNF agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vildan Güngörer
- From the Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chaplin H, Bosworth A, Simpson C, Wilkins K, Meehan J, Nikiphorou E, Moss-Morris R, Lempp H, Norton S. Refractory inflammatory arthritis definition and model generated through patient and multi-disciplinary professional modified Delphi process. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289760. [PMID: 37556424 PMCID: PMC10411820 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Various definitions have been proposed for Refractory Disease in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis; however, none were generated for Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis or involving adult and paediatric multidisciplinary healthcare professionals and patients. The study aim is to redefine Refractory Disease, using Delphi methodology. METHODS Three rounds of surveys (one nominal group and two online (2019-2020)) to achieve consensus using a predetermined cut-off were conducted voting on: a) name, b) treatment and inflammation, c) symptoms and impact domains, and d) rating of individual components within domains. Theoretical application of the definition was conducted through a scoping exercise. RESULTS Votes were collected across three rounds from Patients, Researchers and nine multi-disciplinary healthcare professional groups (n = 106). Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis was the most popular name. Regarding treatment and inflammation, these were voted to be kept broad rather than specifying numbers/cut-offs. From 10 domains identified to capture symptoms and disease impact, six domains reached consensus for inclusion: 1) Disease Activity, 2) Joint Involvement, 3) Pain, 4) Fatigue, 5) Functioning and Quality of Life, and 6) Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Experiences. Within these domains, 18 components, from an initial pool (n = 73), were identified as related and important to capture multi-faceted presentation of Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis, specifically in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Feasibility of the revised definition was established (2022-2023) with good utility as was applied to 82% of datasets (n = 61) incorporating 20 outcome measures, with two further measures added to increase its utility and coverage of Pain and Fatigue. CONCLUSION Refractory Inflammatory Arthritis has been found to be broader than not achieving low disease activity, with wider biopsychosocial components and factors incorporating Persistent Inflammation or Symptoms identified as important. This definition needs further refinement to assess utility as a classification tool to identify patients with unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hema Chaplin
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ailsa Bosworth
- National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, White Waltham, United Kingdom
| | - Carol Simpson
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Wilkins
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Meehan
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Norton
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Douglas S, Foster HE, Southwood TR, Hyrich KL, Ciurtin C. Successful stopping of biologic therapy for remission in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:1926-1935. [PMID: 36104094 PMCID: PMC10152290 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Clinicians concerned about long-term safety of biologics in JIA may consider tapering or stopping treatment once remission is achieved despite uncertainty in maintaining drug-free remission. This analysis aims to (i) calculate how many patients with JIA stop biologics for remission, (ii) calculate how many later re-start therapy and after how long, and (iii) identify factors associated with re-starting biologics. METHODS Patients starting biologics between 1 January 2010 and 7 September 2021 in the UK JIA Biologics Register were included. Patients stopping biologics for physician-reported remission, those re-starting biologics and factors associated with re-starting, were identified. Multiple imputation accounted for missing data. RESULTS Of 1451 patients with median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.4, 4.0), 269 (19%) stopped biologics for remission after a median of 2.2 years (IQR 1.7, 3.0). Of those with follow-up data (N = 220), 118 (54%) later re-started therapy after a median of 4.7 months, with 84% re-starting the same biologic. Patients on any-line tocilizumab (prior to stopping) were less likely to re-start biologics (vs etanercept; odds ratio [OR] 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7), while those with a longer disease duration prior to biologics (OR 1.1 per year increase; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.2) or prior uveitis were more likely to re-start biologics (OR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.9). CONCLUSIONS This analysis identified factors associated with successful cessation of biologics for remission in JIA as absence of uveitis, prior treatment with tocilizumab and starting biologics earlier in the disease course. Further research is needed to guide clinical recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester
| | - Eileen Baildam
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust.,Institute of Life Course and Medical Specialities, University of Liverpool, Liverpool
| | - Sharon Douglas
- Scottish Network for Arthritis in Children (SNAC), Edinburgh
| | - Helen E Foster
- Population and Health Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | | | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester.,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester
| | - Coziana Ciurtin
- Centre for Adolescent Rheumatology, Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Currie GR, Pham T, Twilt M, IJzerman MJ, Hull PM, Kip MMA, Benseler SM, Hazlewood GS, Yeung RSM, Wulffraat NM, Swart JF, Vastert SJ, Marshall DA. Perspectives of Pediatric Rheumatologists on Initiating and Tapering Biologics in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Formative Qualitative Study. THE PATIENT 2022; 15:599-609. [PMID: 35322390 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00575-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined pediatric rheumatologists' approaches to treatment decision making for biologic therapy for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). This study presents the qualitative research undertaken to support the development of a Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) survey for tapering in JIA. The study objectives were to (1) describe the treatment decision-making process of pediatric rheumatologists to initiate and taper biologics; and (2) select attributes for a BWS survey. METHODS Pediatric rheumatologists across Canada were recruited to participate in interviews using purposeful sampling. Interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and transcripts were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Initial codes were organized into themes and subthemes using an iterative process. Attributes for the BWS survey were developed from these themes and a literature review was conducted in parallel to inform survey development. Further refinement of the attributes was done through consultation with the research team. RESULTS Five pediatric rheumatologists participated in the interviews. Shared decision making was part of the approach to initiating and tapering biologics in their practice. Tapering approaches differed; some pediatric rheumatologists preferred to stop biologics immediately, while others tapered by reducing dose and/or increasing the dose interval over time. A total of 14 attributes were developed for the BWS. Thirteen attributes were selected from the themes that emerged from the qualitative interviews and one attribute was included after review with the research team. Attributes related to patient characteristics included JIA subtype, time in remission, history or presence of joint damage or erosive disease, how challenging it was to achieve remission, and history of flares. Contextual attributes included accessibility of biologics and willingness to taper biologics. CONCLUSION This study contributes to the limited literature on pediatric rheumatologists' approaches to treatment decision making for biologics in JIA and identifies attributes that affect the decision to both initiate and taper. Further research is planned to implement the BWS survey to understand the importance of the attributes identified. Additional investigation is required to determine if these characteristics align with patient and parent preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian R Currie
- Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Tram Pham
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Marinka Twilt
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline M Hull
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michelle M A Kip
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne M Benseler
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Glen S Hazlewood
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rae S M Yeung
- Departments of Paediatrics, Immunology and Medical Science, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nico M Wulffraat
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joost F Swart
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian J Vastert
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital/UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Deborah A Marshall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
- Health Research Innovation Centre, University of Calgary, Room 3C56, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Research progress in drug therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. World J Pediatr 2022; 18:383-397. [PMID: 35364799 DOI: 10.1007/s12519-022-00530-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease in children. With the gradual expansion of the incidence of JIA in the population, the pathogenesis and treatment of JIA were further explored and analyzed, and JIA has achieved some success in drug therapy. DATA SOURCES A systemic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and the EU Clinical Trials Register. Through the searching of clinical trials of JIA in recent years, we summarized the progress of the clinical treatment of JIA. RESULTS The main treatment drugs for JIA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biological agents. So far, a variety of biological agents targeting the cytokines and receptors involved in its pathogenesis have been gradually approved for JIA in many countries. The application of biological agents in JIA showed good efficacy and safety, bringing unprecedented experience to children and adolescents with JIA. CONCLUSIONS The potential and advantages of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA are significant, and the application of biologic agents in the treatment of JIA will be more and more common.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Klotsche J, van Straalen JW, Costello W, D’Angelo G, Giancane G, Horneff G, Klein A, Láday M, Lunt M, de Roock S, Ruperto N, Schoemaker C, Vijatov-Djuric G, Vojinovic J, Vougiouka O, Wulffraat NM, Hyrich KL, Minden K, Swart JF. Burden of comorbid conditions in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a collaborative analysis of 3 JIA registries. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:2524-2534. [PMID: 34613385 PMCID: PMC9157174 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Burden of comorbidities are largely unknown in JIA. From 2000, national and international patient registries were established to monitor biologic treatment, disease activity and adverse events in patients with JIA. The aim of this analysis was to investigate in parallel, for the first time, three of the largest JIA registries in Europe/internationally-UK JIA Biologic Registers (BCRD/BSPAR-ETN), German biologic registers (BiKeR/JuMBO), multinational Pharmachild-to quantify the occurrence of selected comorbidities in patients with JIA. METHODS Information on which data the registers collect were compared. Patient characteristics and levels of comorbidity were presented, focussing on four key conditions: uveitis, MAS, varicella, and history of tuberculosis. Incidence rates of these on MTX/biologic therapy were determined. RESULTS 8066 patients were registered into the three JIA registers with similar history of the four comorbidities across the studies; however, varicella vaccination coverage was higher in Germany (56%) vs UK/Pharmachild (16%/13%). At final follow-up, prevalence of varicella infection was lower in Germany (15%) vs UK/Pharmachild (37%/50%). Prevalence of TB (0.1-1.8%) and uveitis (15-19%) was similar across all registers. The proportion of systemic-JIA patients who ever had MAS was lower in Germany (6%) vs UK (15%) and Pharmachild (17%). CONCLUSION This analysis is the first and largest to investigate the occurrence of four important comorbidities in three JIA registries in Europe and the role of anti-rheumatic drugs. Combined, these three registries represent one of the biggest collection of cases of JIA worldwide and offer a unique setting for future JIA outcome studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jens Klotsche
- Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joeri W van Straalen
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wendy Costello
- iIrish Children’s Arthritis Network (iCAN), Bansha, Co Tipperary, Ireland
| | | | - Gabriella Giancane
- Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gerd Horneff
- Department of Pediatrics, Asklepios Kinderklinik Sankt Augustin, Sankt Augustin
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ariane Klein
- Department of Pediatrics, Asklepios Kinderklinik Sankt Augustin, Sankt Augustin
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matilda Láday
- Pediatric Clinical Department 1, Spitalul Clinic Judetean De Urgenta, Tîrgu-Mureș, Romania
| | - Mark Lunt
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sytze de Roock
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nicolino Ruperto
- Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Casper Schoemaker
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Dutch JIA Patient and Parent Organisation (Member of ENCA), Rijen, The Netherlands
| | - Gordana Vijatov-Djuric
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad
- Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, Institute for Child and Youth Health Care of Vojvodina, Novi Sad
| | - Jelena Vojinovic
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Nis, University Clinic Center
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Clinical Center Nis, Clinic of Pediatrics, Nis, Serbia
| | - Olga Vougiouka
- ‘P a A Kyriakou’ Children’s Hospital, 2nd Paediatric Department, Athens University School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Nico M Wulffraat
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Manchester BRC, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kirsten Minden
- Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Joost F Swart
- Department of Paediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hur P, Yi E, Ionescu-Ittu R, Manceur AM, Lomax KG, Cammarota J, Xie J, Gautam R, Nakasato P, Sanghera N, Kim N, Grom AA. Reasons for Initiating Canakinumab among Patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult-Onset Still's Disease in the U.S. Real-World Settings. Rheumatol Ther 2021; 9:265-283. [PMID: 34874547 PMCID: PMC8814295 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00402-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to understand the reasons for canakinumab initiation among patients with Still’s disease, including systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) and adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), in US clinical practice. Methods Physicians retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients with Still’s disease (regardless of age at symptom onset) who were prescribed canakinumab from 2016 to 2018. Patients aged < 16 years at symptom onset were classified as having SJIA and those aged ≥ 16 years at symptom onset (calculated from case-record forms) were classified as having AOSD. Patient treatment history and physician reasons for canakinumab initiation were analyzed. Overall results were presented as SJIA/AOSD. Sensitivity analyses were performed for the robustness of the results. Results Forty-three physicians in the USA (rheumatologists/dermatologists/immunologists/allergists: 51.2/27.9/11.6/9.3%; subspecialty in adults/pediatrics: 67.4/32.6%) abstracted information for 72 patients with SJIA/AOSD (SJIA/AOSD/age unknown at symptom onset: 75.0/18.1/6.9%; mean age 19.4 years; children 61.1%; females 56.9%). Most patients (90.3%) received treatment directly preceding canakinumab initiation (etanercept 27.7%; anakinra 18.5%; adalimumab 16.9%); the respective treatment was discontinued due to lack of efficacy/effectiveness (43.1%) and availability of a new treatment (27.8%). Most common reasons for canakinumab initiation were physician perceived/experienced efficacy/effectiveness of canakinumab (77.8%; children/adults: 81.8/71.4%), lack-of-response to previous treatment (45.8%; children/adults: 36.4/60.7%), convenient administration/dosing (26.4%; children/adults: 29.5/21.4%) and ability to discontinue/spare steroids (25.0%; children/adults: 20.5/32.1%). The sensitivity analysis provided similar results. Conclusions In US clinical practice, physician perceived/experienced efficacy/effectiveness of canakinumab and lack-of-response to previous treatment were the primary reasons for canakinumab initiation among patients with SJIA/AOSD. Physician perceived/experienced efficacy/effectiveness and convenient administration/dosing of canakinumab were the most common reasons for canakinumab initiation among children, whereas lack-of-response to previous treatment and ability to discontinue/spare steroids being the most frequent reasons among adults. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00402-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hur
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Esther Yi
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jipan Xie
- Analysis Group, Inc, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Raju Gautam
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | - Nina Kim
- Baylor Scott and White Medical Center-Temple, Temple, TX, USA.,The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Alexei A Grom
- Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, MLC 4010, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beukelman T, Lougee A, Matsouaka RA, Collier D, Rumsey DG, Schenfeld J, Stryker S, Twilt M, Kimura Y. Patterns of etanercept use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2021; 19:131. [PMID: 34419107 PMCID: PMC8380401 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-021-00625-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to characterize etanercept (ETN) use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. METHODS The CARRA Registry is a convenience cohort of patients with paediatric onset rheumatic diseases, including JIA. JIA patients treated with ETN for whom the month and year of ETN initiation were available were included. Patterns of ETN and methotrexate (MTX) use were categorized as follows: combination therapy (ETN and MTX started concurrently), step-up therapy (MTX started first and ETN added later), switchers (MTX started and then stopped when or before ETN started), MTX add-on (ETN started first and MTX added later), and ETN only (no MTX use). Data were described using parametric and non-parametric statistics as appropriate. RESULTS Two thousand thirty-two of the five thousand six hundred forty-one patients with JIA met inclusion criteria (74% female, median age at diagnosis 6.0 years [interquartile range 2.0, 11.0]. Most patients (66.9%) were treated with a non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), primarily MTX, prior to ETN. There was significant variability in patterns of MTX use prior to starting ETN. Step-up therapy was the most common approach. Only 34.0% of persistent oligoarticular JIA patients continued treatment with a non-biologic DMARD 3 months or more after ETN initiation. ETN persistence overall was 66.3, 49.4, and 37.3% at 24, 36 and 48 months respectively. ETN persistence among spondyloarthritis patients (enthesitis related arthritis and psoriatic JIA) varied by MTX initiation pattern, with higher ETN persistence rates in those who initiated combination therapy (68.9%) and switchers/ETN only (73.3%) patients compared to step-up (65.4%) and MTX add-on (51.1%) therapy. CONCLUSION This study characterizes contemporary patterns of ETN use in the CARRA Registry. Treatment was largely in keeping with American College of Rheumatology guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Beukelman
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, CPPN G10, 1600 7th Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
| | - Aimee Lougee
- grid.26009.3d0000 0004 1936 7961Duke University, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 200 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701 USA
| | - Roland A. Matsouaka
- grid.26009.3d0000 0004 1936 7961Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Duke Clinical Research Institute, 200 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701 USA
| | - David Collier
- grid.417886.40000 0001 0657 5612Global Medical Affairs, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California 91320-1799 USA
| | - Dax G. Rumsey
- grid.17089.37Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, 3-502 ECHA; 11405 87 Ave NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9 Canada
| | - Jennifer Schenfeld
- grid.417886.40000 0001 0657 5612Center for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California 91320-1799 USA
| | - Scott Stryker
- grid.417886.40000 0001 0657 5612Center for Observational Research, Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California 91320-1799 USA
| | - Marinka Twilt
- grid.22072.350000 0004 1936 7697Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children’s Hospital, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 28 Oki Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8 Canada
| | - Yukiko Kimura
- grid.239835.60000 0004 0407 6328Joseph M. Sanzari Children’s Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Davies R, De Cock D, Kearsley-Fleet L, Southwood T, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Foster HE, Thomson W, Ramanan AV, Hyrich KL. The risk of uveitis in patients with JIA receiving etanercept: the challenges of analysing real-world data. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 59:1391-1397. [PMID: 31605484 PMCID: PMC7244776 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To describe and compare the occurrence of newly diagnosed uveitis in children with JIA receiving MTX, etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab. Methods This on-drug analysis included patients within UK JIA registries (British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study and Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases) with non-systemic disease, registered at MTX or biologic start with no history of uveitis. Follow-up began from date of first treatment, continuing until first uveitis, discontinuation of registered drug, most recent follow-up up or death, whichever came first. Hazard ratios comparing risk of uveitis between drugs were calculated using propensity-adjusted Cox regression. Results A total of 2294 patients were included (943 MTX, 304 adalimumab/infliximab, 1047 etanercept). There were 44 reported cases of uveitis (27 MTX, 16 etanercept, 1 adalimumab). Unadjusted hazard ratio showed a reduced risk of uveitis in biologic cohorts compared with MTX. After adjusting for propensity deciles, there was no significant difference in the risk of uveitis between patients receiving etanercept or MTX [hazard ratio 0.5 (0.2–1.1)]. Fully adjusted comparisons were not possible for adalimumab/infliximab as there were too few events. Conclusions In this first paper to compare the rate of new onset uveitis across the three main anti-TNF therapies used in JIA, a new diagnosis of uveitis is less common among patients starting biologics compared with MTX, although this did not reach statistical significance. The suggested protective effect of etanercept is likely explained by confounding, whereby patients in the MTX cohort are younger and earlier in disease, and therefore at greater risk of developing uveitis compared with etanercept patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Davies
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester
| | - Diederik De Cock
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester
| | - Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester
| | - Taunton Southwood
- Institute of Child Health, University of Birmingham & Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham
| | - Eileen Baildam
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool.,University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool
| | - Helen E Foster
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne.,Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | - Wendy Thomson
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biologic, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester.,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester
| | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol.,Paediatric Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester.,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jones AP, Clayton D, Nkhoma G, Sherratt FC, Peak M, Stones SR, Roper L, Young B, McErlane F, Moitt T, Ramanan AV, Foster HE, Williamson PR, Deepak S, Beresford MW, Baildam EM. Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1-152. [PMID: 32758350 PMCID: PMC7443738 DOI: 10.3310/hta24360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the UK, juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common inflammatory disorder in childhood, affecting 10 : 100,000 children and young people aged < 16 years each year, with a population prevalence of around 1 : 1000. Corticosteroids are commonly used to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis; however, there is currently a lack of consensus as to which corticosteroid induction regimen should be used with various disease subtypes and severities of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. OBJECTIVE The main study objective was to determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to compare the different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. DESIGN This was a mixed-methods study. Work packages included a literature review; qualitative interviews with children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and their families; a questionnaire survey and screening log to establish current UK practice; a consensus meeting with health-care professionals, children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and their families to establish the primary outcome; a feasibility study to pilot data capture and to collect data for future sample size calculations; and a final consensus meeting to establish the final protocol. SETTING The setting was rheumatology clinics across the UK. PARTICIPANTS Children, young people and their families who attended clinics and health-care professionals took part in this mixed-methods study. INTERVENTIONS This study observed methods of prescribing corticosteroids across the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main study outcomes were the acceptability of a future trial for children, young people, their families and health-care professionals, and the feasibility of delivering such a trial. RESULTS Qualitative interviews identified differences in the views of children, young people and their families on a randomised controlled trial and potential barriers to recruitment. A total of 297 participants were screened from 13 centres in just less than 6 months. In practice, all routes of corticosteroid administration were used, and in all subtypes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection was the most common treatment. The questionnaire surveys showed the varying clinical practice across the UK, but established intra-articular corticosteroids as the treatment control for a future trial. The primary outcome of choice for children, young people, their families and health-care professionals was the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, 71-joint count. However, results from the feasibility study showed that, owing to missing blood test data, the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score should be used. The Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score, 71-joint count, and the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score are composite disease activity scoring systems for juvenile arthritis. Two final trial protocols were established for a future randomised controlled trial. LIMITATIONS Fewer clinics were included in this feasibility study than originally planned, limiting the ability to draw strong conclusions about these units to take part in future research. CONCLUSIONS A definitive randomised controlled trial is likely to be feasible based on the findings from this study; however, important recommendations should be taken into account when planning such a trial. FUTURE WORK This mixed-methods study has laid down the foundations to develop the evidence base in this area and conducting a randomised control trial to compare different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis is likely to be feasible. STUDY REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16649996. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 36. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley P Jones
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Dannii Clayton
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gloria Nkhoma
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Matthew Peak
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Louise Roper
- School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- School of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Flora McErlane
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tracy Moitt
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Athimalaipet V Ramanan
- Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Paula R Williamson
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Samundeeswari Deepak
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Nottingham Children's Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Faculty of Health and Life Science, University of Liverpool and Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, members of Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eileen M Baildam
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, a member of the Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Heaf E, Davies R, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Foster HE, Southwood TR, Thomson W, Hyrich KL. Frequency of biologic switching and the outcomes of switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a national cohort study. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2020; 2:e217-e226. [PMID: 32280951 PMCID: PMC7134528 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(20)30025-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information is scarce about biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) switching patterns in children and young people (aged ≤16 years) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in an era of many biologic therapies. The best choice of biologic to use if the first biological DMARD is not beneficial also remains unclear. We aimed to quantify and characterise biologic switching patterns in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and to compare the effectiveness of using a second tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) versus non-TNF is following failure of a first TNFi biologic in routine clinical practice. METHODS Our study population comprised patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who were enrolled in two parallel UK cohort studies (the British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study [BSPAR-ETN] and the Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases [BCRD] study) between Jan 1, 2004, and April 11, 2019. Data on disease characteristics and DMARD therapy were collected at the time of initiation of a first biologic, at 6 months, at 1 year, and annually thereafter. Biologic switching patterns were described in all patients who started their first biologic from Jan 1, 2010, onwards. Among patients who started treatment with their first biologic from Jan 1, 2004, onwards, had polyarticular course juvenile idiopathic arthritis (extended oligoarthritis or polyarthritis [positive or negative for rheumatoid factor]), and who had started a second biologic, we assessed changes in outcome variables at 6 months compared with baseline and compared the proportion of patients who achieved an American College of Rheumatology Pediatric (ACR Pedi) 90 response and minimal disease activity at 6 months on the basis of the class of the second biologic (a second TNFi vs non-TNFi biologic). Changes in outcome variables at 6 months were compared using linear regression or logistic regression, adjusted for propensity quintiles to account for confounding by indication. We used multiple imputation to account for missing data. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2004, and April 11, 2019, 2361 patients were enrolled on initiation of biologic therapy. From Jan 1, 2010, onwards, 1152 patients started their first biologic, most of whom started treatment with TNFis (1050 [91%]). The median follow-up was 2·2 years (IQR 1·1-3·8). During this time, 270 (23%) of 1152 patients started a second biologic, 61 (5%) started a third biologic, and 11 (1%) started a fourth biologic. Among 240 patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis, 194 (81%) started a second TNFi and 46 (19%) started a non-TNFi after an initial TNFi had failed. Choice of second treatment (second TNFi vs non-TNFi biologic) did not affect the proportion of patients who achieved an ACR Pedi 90 response (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2·5, 95% CI 0·8-7·9; p=0·11) or minimal disease activity (adjusted OR 1·6, 95% CI 0·6-3·8; p=0·33). INTERPRETATION For many children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, treatment with a first or second biologic is not beneficial. We found no evidence that switching to a second non-TNFi biologic was more beneficial than a second TNFi. FUNDING Versus Arthritis and The British Society for Rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Eleanor Heaf
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Davies
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Eileen Baildam
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK,Institute of Translational Medicine (Child Health), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK,Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Taunton R Southwood
- Institute of Child Health, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wendy Thomson
- Centre for Genetics and Genomics Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK,Correspondence to: Prof Kimme L Hyrich, Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Halyabar O, Mehta J, Ringold S, Rumsey DG, Horton DB. Treatment Withdrawal Following Remission in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Paediatr Drugs 2019; 21:469-492. [PMID: 31673960 PMCID: PMC7301222 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-019-00362-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early diagnosis and treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with conventional and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have vastly improved outcomes for children with these diseases. Currently, a large proportion of children with JIA are able to achieve clinical inactive disease and remission. With this success, important questions have arisen about when medications can be stopped and how to balance the risks and benefits of continuing medications versus the potential for flare after stopping. AIM The aim was to conduct a systematic review of the available literature to summarize current evidence about medication withdrawal for JIA in remission. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase from 1990 to 2019. References were first screened by title and then independently screened by title and abstract by two authors. A total of 77 original papers were selected for full-text review. Data were extracted from 30 papers on JIA and JIA-associated uveitis, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tools. Studies on biochemical and radiologic biomarkers were also reviewed and summarized. RESULTS Most studies investigating treatment withdrawal in JIA have been observational and of poor or fair quality; interpretations of these studies have been limited by differences in study populations, disease and remission durations, the medications withdrawn, approaches to withdrawal, and definitions of disease outcomes. Overall the data suggest that flares are common after stopping JIA medications, particularly biologic medications. Clinical characteristics associated with increased risks of flare have not been consistently identified. Biochemical biomarkers and ultrasound findings have been shown to predict outcomes after stopping medications, but to date, no such predictor has been consistently validated across JIA populations. Studies have also not identified optimal strategies for withdrawing medication for well-controlled JIA. Promising withdrawal strategies include discontinuing methotrexate before biologic medications in children receiving combination therapy, dose reduction for children on biologics, and treat-to-target approaches to withdrawal. These and other strategies require further investigation in larger, high-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS The published literature on treatment withdrawal in JIA has varied in design and quality, yielding little conclusive evidence thus far on the management of JIA in remission. Given the importance of this question, international collaborative efforts are underway to study clinical and biologic predictors of successful medication withdrawal in JIA. These efforts may ultimately support the development of personalized approaches to withdrawing medication in children with JIA in remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olha Halyabar
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s
Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jay Mehta
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah Ringold
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children’s
Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Dax G. Rumsey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton,
Alberta, Canada
| | - Daniel B. Horton
- Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson
Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA,Rutgers Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment
Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, New Brunswick,
NJ, USA,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers
School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Sampath S, McCann LJ, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Davies R, De Cock D, Foster HE, Southwood TR, Thomson W, Hyrich KL. Use and effectiveness of rituximab in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a cohort study in the United Kingdom. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:331-335. [PMID: 30358861 PMCID: PMC6343463 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Rituximab (RTX) may be a treatment option for children and young people with JIA, although it is not licensed for this indication. The aim of this study was to describe RTX use and outcomes among children with JIA. Methods This analysis included all JIA patients within the UK Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases study starting RTX. Disease activity was assessed at RTX start and at follow-up. The total number of courses each patient received was assessed. Serious infections and infusion reactions occurring following RTX were reported. Results Forty-one JIA patients starting RTX were included, the majority with polyarthritis: polyarthritis RF negative [n = 14 (35%)], polyarthritis RF positive [n = 13 (33%)] and extended oligoarthritis [n = 9 (23%)]. Most were female (80%) with a median age of 15 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12–16] and a median disease duration of 9 years (IQR 5–11). The median improvement in the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS; three-variable 71-joint JADAS) from RTX start was 9 units (n = 7; IQR −14–2). More than half reported more than one course of RTX. The median time between each course was 219 days (IQR 198–315). During follow-up, 17 (41%) patients reported switching to another biologic, including tocilizumab (n = 8), abatacept (n = 6) and TNF inhibitor (n = 3). Three patients (7%) reported a serious infection on RTX (rate of first serious infection 6.2/100 person-years). Four patients (10%) reported an infusion reaction. Conclusions This real-world cohort of children with JIA, the majority with polyarticular or extended oligoarticular JIA, showed RTX may be an effective treatment option for children who do not respond to TNF inhibitor, with a low rate of serious infections on treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Sunil Sampath
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Liza J McCann
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Eileen Baildam
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK.,Institute of Translational Medicine (Child Health), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rebecca Davies
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Diederik De Cock
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Taunton R Southwood
- Institute of Child Health, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wendy Thomson
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biologic, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tollisen A, Flatø B, Selvaag AM, Aasland A, Ingebrigtsen T, Sagen J, Lerdal A. Treatment Satisfaction With and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Adult Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 73:221-231. [PMID: 31758669 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine medication satisfaction and adherence and their relationships to disease variables and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS Patients (n = 96, mean age 25 years, 67% female) completed questionnaires about their health status 19 years after disease onset. Patients receiving biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or methotrexate (MTX) were assessed with the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), including dimensions of effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction. RESULTS DMARDs were received by 52 patients (54%) (mean age 25 years, 75% female), of which 28 received MTX and 37 received bDMARDs. Patients receiving combination therapy of MTX and bDMARDs (n = 15) reported higher satisfaction with bDMARDs than MTX in the dimensions of side effects and global satisfaction (mean ± SD 92.9 ± 15.5 versus 56.2 ± 30.9, and mean ± SD 67.6 ± 19.8 versus 47.1 ± 21.7; P < 0.001 and P = 0.016, respectively). Patients receiving either bDMARDs (n = 22) or MTX (n = 13) reported higher satisfaction with bDMARDs than MTX for the dimensions of effectiveness and global satisfaction (mean ± SD 78.7 ± 15.4 versus 60.2 ± 19.9, and mean ± SD 73.6 ± 17.7 versus 52.3 ± 23.9; P = 0.004 and P = 0.005, respectively). Nearly one-half of patients (46%) reported low adherence (MMAS-8 score <6) and 25% high adherence (MMAS-8 score = 8). Higher levels of pain, psychological distress, more active joints, and current MTX use were the strongest correlates of lower medication satisfaction. Perceived medication effectiveness and global satisfaction correlated positively with physical and mental HRQoL. CONCLUSION Patients with JIA were more satisfied with bDMARDs than MTX, and 46% reported low adherence. Higher medication satisfaction was associated with better HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Tollisen
- Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Unger-Vetlesens Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Berit Flatø
- Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Joachim Sagen
- Children and Youth Rheumatology Association, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anners Lerdal
- Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Beresford MW, Davies R, De Cock D, Baildam E, Foster HE, Southwood TR, Thomson W, Hyrich KL. Short-term outcomes in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis treated with either tocilizumab or anakinra. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:94-102. [PMID: 30137641 PMCID: PMC6293481 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate real-world short-term outcomes among patients with systemic JIA starting tocilizumab or anakinra. Methods This analysis included all systemic JIA patients within the UK Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases study starting tocilizumab or anakinra between 2010 and 2016. Disease activity was assessed at baseline and one year. At one year the following outcomes were assessed: minimal disease activity, clinically inactive disease, 90% ACR Paediatric response (ACRPedi90). Univariable logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with these outcomes. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results Seventy-six systemic JIA patients were included (54 tocilizumab; 22 anakinra). More patients starting anakinra as their first biologic compared with tocilizumab (86% vs 63%; P = 0.04), with shorter disease duration (1 vs 2 years; P = 0.003) and higher frequency of prior macrophage activation syndrome (37% vs 8%; P = 0.004). Overall, at one year, 42% achieved ACRPedi90, 51% minimal disease activity, and 39% clinically inactive disease, with similar responses seen between the two drugs. Response was not associated with baseline disease characteristics. Fifteen (20%) patients stopped biologic treatment by one year. Treatment survival was better with tocilizumab (89% at one year vs 59% anakinra; P = 0.002), with three stopping for anakinra injection-related problems. Conclusion In this real-world cohort of patients with systemic JIA receiving tocilizumab or anakinra, approximately half achieved a minimal disease state by one year. Treatment responses appeared similar between the two therapies albeit with better persistence observed with tocilizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Institute of Translational Medicine (Child Health), University of Liverpool, UK.,Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rebecca Davies
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Diederik De Cock
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eileen Baildam
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.,Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Taunton R Southwood
- Institute of Child Health, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wendy Thomson
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Grönlund MM, Remes-Pakarinen T, Kröger L, Markula-Patjas K, Backström M, Putto-Laurila A, Aalto K, Vähäsalo P. Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in a real-life observational cohort of patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 59:732-741. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the patterns of usage, efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in polyarticular JIA.
Methods
An observational study of 56 consecutive polyarticular JIA patients was conducted using patient charts and electronic JIA databases. Efficacy was assessed by tocilizumab survival, rates of low disease activity (LDA) and of inactive disease by 10-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-10), and of clinically inactive disease according to Wallace’s preliminary criteria. Efficacy and rate of adverse events (AEs) were evaluated during a 24-month period after tocilizumab commencement.
Results
Tocilizumab was started on average as third-line biological agent (median, range first- to fourth-line) at a median disease duration of 5.2 years (interquartile range 3.0–7.7). Survival rates were 82% at 12 months and 64% at 24 months. The reasons for discontinuation were inadequate treatment effect in 50%, AE plus inadequate treatment effect in 37.5% and AE alone in 12.5%. LDA (JADAS-10 ⩽3.9) was reached in 58% at 12 months and in 84% at 24 months, inactive disease (JADAS-10 ⩽0.7) in 19% and 44%, and clinically inactive disease in 28% and 46%, respectively. The rate of AEs was 200.9/100 patient years and of serious AEs 12.9/100 patient years.
Conclusion
Survival of tocilizumab was high and a large proportion of the treatment-resistant patients reached LDA at 12 months of treatment. The LDA rate continued to increase throughout 24 months. The rates of AEs and serious AEs were higher than in register studies but lower than in the originator study of tocilizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Liisa Kröger
- Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio
| | - Kati Markula-Patjas
- Department of Paediatrics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere
- University of Tampere, Tampere
| | | | | | - Kristiina Aalto
- Department of Children and Adolescents, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki
- Pediatric Research Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki
| | - Paula Vähäsalo
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu
- Department of Children and Adolescents, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu
- PEDEGO Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Predicting disease outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: challenges, evidence, and new directions. THE LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2019; 3:725-733. [PMID: 31331873 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(19)30188-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The aims of treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis are to elicit treatment response toward remission, while preventing future flares. Understanding patient and disease characteristics that predispose young people with this condition to these outcomes would allow the forecasting of disease process and the tailoring of therapies. The strongest predictor of remission is disease category, particularly oligoarthritis, although a few additional clinical predictors of treatment response have been identified. Novel evidence using biomarkers, such as S100 proteins and novel single nucleotide polymorphism data, could add value to clinical models. The future aim of personalised medicine in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis will be aided with international collaborations, allowing for the analysis of larger datasets with novel biomarker data. Combined clinical and biomarker panels will probably be required for predicting outcomes in such a complex disease.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic childhood arthritis. Its pathogenesis is very complicated, with the involvement of not only immune cells but various types of parenchymal cells, and is affected by both genetic and environmental predispositions. The clinical spectrum from inflammation to related conditions is largely mediated by cytokines including interleukin (IL)-6. Fluctuations in IL-6 and its related molecules can modulate the pathogenesis and the clinical presentation positively or negatively. The recent clinical impact of IL-6 blockade on JIA has begun a therapeutic paradigm shift. This review describes the characteristics of JIA, mainly focused on IL-6 with the current therapeutic perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinji Akioka
- a Department of Pediatrics , Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine , Kyoto , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kearsley-Fleet L, Vicente González L, Steinke D, Davies R, De Cock D, Baildam E, Beresford MW, Foster HE, Southwood TR, Thomson W, Hyrich KL. Methotrexate persistence and adverse drug reactions in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:kez048. [PMID: 30851113 PMCID: PMC6649753 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This analysis aims to calculate MTX monotherapy persistence and describe the occurrence of and factors associated with the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with MTX. METHODS Patients with JIA starting MTX monotherapy from two UK studies were included. Patient characteristics, treatment details and ADR occurrence were collected at treatment start, 6 months, 1 year and annually. The following groups of ADRs were included: gastrointestinal, elevated liver enzymes, leukopenia, drug hypersensitivity, rash, needle phobia and any events leading to permanent MTX discontinuation. Treatment exposure was calculated from MTX start until MTX monotherapy cessation, last follow-up or 31 December 2017 (cut-off), whichever came first. Survival analysis assessed the time on MTX monotherapy and the time to the first ADR on MTX monotherapy within 2 years. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with any ADR and gastrointestinal ADRs. RESULTS A total of 577 patients started MTX. At 2 years, 310 (54%) were no longer on MTX monotherapy. Reasons included ineffectiveness (60%; 161/185 started a biologic), adverse event (25%), remission (8%) and patient/family decision (3%). Over this time, 212 (37%) patients experienced one or more ADR; commonly gastrointestinal (68%) or elevated liver enzymes (26%). Lower physician global assessment and older age predicted any ADR and gastrointestinal ADR, respectively. Patients with polyarticular RF and JIA had reduced odds of both any ADR and a gastrointestinal ADR. CONCLUSION After 2 years, more than half the patients were no longer on MTX monotherapy, while more than one-third experienced one or more ADR, most commonly gastrointestinal. Research focusing on identifying which children will respond and/or experience ADRs is crucial to inform treatment decisions and management planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianne Kearsley-Fleet
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Laura Vicente González
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Douglas Steinke
- Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Davies
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Diederik De Cock
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eileen Baildam
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Michael W Beresford
- Clinical Academic Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Institute of Translational Medicine (Child Health), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Helen E Foster
- Musculoskeletal Research Group, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Paediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Taunton R Southwood
- Institute of Child Health, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Children’s Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wendy Thomson
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Genetics and Genomics, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Faculty of Biologic, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Swart J, Giancane G, Horneff G, Magnusson B, Hofer M, Alexeeva Е, Panaviene V, Bader-Meunier B, Anton J, Nielsen S, De Benedetti F, Kamphuis S, Staņēviča V, Tracahana M, Ailioaie LM, Tsitsami E, Klein A, Minden K, Foeldvari I, Haas JP, Klotsche J, Horne AC, Consolaro A, Bovis F, Bagnasco F, Pistorio A, Martini A, Wulffraat N, Ruperto N. Pharmacovigilance in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with biologic or synthetic drugs: combined data of more than 15,000 patients from Pharmachild and national registries. Arthritis Res Ther 2018; 20:285. [PMID: 30587248 PMCID: PMC6307151 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1780-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The availability of methotrexate and the introduction of multiple biological agents have revolutionized the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Several international and national drug registries have been implemented to accurately monitor the long-term safety/efficacy of these agents. This report aims to present the combined data coming from Pharmachild/PRINTO registry and the national registries from Germany (BiKeR) and Sweden. METHODS Descriptive statistics was used for demographic, clinical data, drug exposure, adverse events (AEs) and events of special interest (ESIs). For the Swedish register, AE data were not available. RESULTS Data from a total of 15,284 patients were reported: 8274 (54%) from the Pharmachild registry and 3990 (26%) and 3020 (20%) from the German and the Swedish registries, respectively. Pharmachild children showed a younger age (median of 5.4 versus 7.6 years) at JIA onset and shorter disease duration at last available visit (5.3 versus 6.1-6.8) when compared with the other registries. The most frequent JIA category was the rheumatoid factor-negative polyarthritis (range of 24.6-29.9%). Methotrexate (61-84%) and etanercept (24%-61.8%) were the most frequently used synthetic and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), respectively. There was a wide variability in glucocorticoid use (16.7-42.1%). Serious AEs were present in 572 (6.9%) patients in Pharmachild versus 297 (7.4%) in BiKeR. Infection and infestations were the most frequent AEs (29.4-30.1%) followed by gastrointestinal disorders (11.5-19.6%). The most frequent ESIs were infections (75.3-89%). CONCLUSIONS This article is the first attempt to present a very large sample of data on JIA patients from different national and international registries and represents the first proposal for data merging as the most powerful tool for future analysis of safety and effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapies in JIA. REGISTRY REGISTRATION The Pharmachild registry is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01399281 ) and at the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP) ( http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=19362 ). The BiKeR registry is registered at ENCePP ( http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=20591 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost Swart
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan, 6 PO box 85090, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gabriella Giancane
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, PRINTO, Via Gaslini, 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gerd Horneff
- Asklepios Clinic Sankt Augustin, Arnold-Janssen strasse 29, Sankt Augustin, Germany.,Department of Pediatric and Adolescents medicine, Medical faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bo Magnusson
- Karolinska University Hospital, Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Hofer
- Unité Romande d'Immuno-Rhumatologie Pediatrique/Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Pediatrie, University of Lausanne, Av Bugnon 46, Lausanne, Switzerland.,University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Еkaterina Alexeeva
- Federal State Autonomous Institution "National Medical Research Center of Children's Health" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, LOMONOSOVSKIJ PR-T,2/62, Moscow, Russia.,Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Violeta Panaviene
- Vilnius University, Clinic of Children's Diseases, Vilnius, Lithuania and Children's Hospital, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, Santariskiu, 4, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Brigitte Bader-Meunier
- Université Paris-Descartes, Institut IMAGINE, Centre de référence national pour les Rhumatismes inflammatoires et les maladies Auto-Immunes Systémiques rares de l'Enfant (RAISE), Unité d'Immunologie, Hématologie et Rhumatologie Pediatrique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, 149 Rue De Sevres, Paris, France
| | - Jordi Anton
- Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Unidad de Reumatología Pediátrica, Esplugues de Llobregat, Passeig Sant Joan de Deu 2, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susan Nielsen
- Juliane Marie Centret, Rigshospitalet, Paediatric Rheumatology Unit, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fabrizio De Benedetti
- Division of Rheumatology, IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Piazza S. Onofrio, 4, Rome, Italy
| | - Sylvia Kamphuis
- Sophia Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Dr Molewaterplein 60, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valda Staņēviča
- Riga Stradins University, Department of Pediatrics, Children University Hospital, Vienibas gatve 45, Riga, LV, Latvia
| | - Maria Tracahana
- Hippokration General Hospital, First Department of pediatrics, Thessaloniki University School of Medicine, Konstantinoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Elena Tsitsami
- Aghia Sophia Childrens Hospital, First Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens Medical School, Thivon 1, Athens, Greece
| | - Ariane Klein
- Asklepios Clinic Sankt Augustin, Arnold-Janssen strasse 29, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | - Kirsten Minden
- German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany.,Charité University Medicine, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ivan Foeldvari
- Hamburg Centre for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Dehnhaide 120, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Peter Haas
- German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Deutsches Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendrheumatologie, Zentrum für Schmerztherapie junger Menschen, Gehfeldstrasse 24, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - Jens Klotsche
- German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany.,Charité University Medicine, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Carin Horne
- Karolinska University Hospital, Pediatric Rheumatology Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alessandro Consolaro
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, via Gaslini 5, Genoa, Italy.,Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Riabilitazione, Oftalmologia, Genetica e Scienze Materno-Infantili (DiNOGMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Bovis
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, PRINTO, Via Gaslini, 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Bagnasco
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, PRINTO, Via Gaslini, 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy
| | - Angela Pistorio
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Servizio di Epidemiologia e Biostatistica, via Gaslini 5, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alberto Martini
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Direzione Scientifica, via Gaslini 5, Genoa, Italy
| | - Nico Wulffraat
- Department of Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan, 6 PO box 85090, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicolino Ruperto
- IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, PRINTO, Via Gaslini, 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ruiz-Medrano J, Díaz-Valle D, Cuiña R, Gegúndez J, Chhablani J, Majumder P, Gutierrez-Bonet R. The role of tocilizumab in the treatment of inflammatory diseases of the eye and orbit: A useful alternative. J Fr Ophtalmol 2018; 41:759-766. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 01/18/2018] [Accepted: 02/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
24
|
Bielak M, Husmann E, Weyandt N, Haas JP, Hügle B, Horneff G, Neudorf U, Lutz T, Lilienthal E, Kallinich T, Tenbrock K, Berendes R, Niehues T, Wittkowski H, Weißbarth-Riedel E, Heubner G, Oommen P, Klotsche J, Foell D, Lainka E. IL-6 blockade in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis - achievement of inactive disease and remission (data from the German AID-registry). Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2018; 16:22. [PMID: 29622022 PMCID: PMC5887199 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-018-0236-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is a complex disease with an autoinflammatory component of unknown etiology related to the innate immune system. A major role in the pathogenesis has been ascribed to proinflammatory cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6), and effective drugs inhibiting their signaling are being developed. This study evaluates sJIA patients treated with the IL-6 inhibitor tocilizumab (TCZ) concerning clinical response rate, disease course and adverse effects in a real-life clinical setting. METHODS In 2009 a clinical and research consortium was established, including an online registry for autoinflammatory diseases (AID) ( https://aid-register.de ). Data for this retrospective TCZ study were documented by 13 centers. RESULTS From 7/2009 to 4/2014, 200 patients with sJIA were recorded in the AID-registry. Out of these, 46 (19 m, 27 f, age 1-18 years) received therapy with TCZ. Long term treatment (median 23 months) has been documented in 24/46 patients who were evaluated according to Wallace criteria (active disease 6/24, inactive disease 5/24, remission 13/24 cases). Under observation co-medication were used in 40/46 cases. Adverse events were reported in 11/46 patients. The clinical response rate (no clinical manifestation, no increased inflammation parameters) within the first 12 weeks of treatment was calculated to be 35%. CONCLUSION Out of 200 sJIA children reported in the German AID-registry, 46 were treated with TCZ, showing a clinical response rate of 35% during the first 12 weeks, and inactive disease and/or remission under medication in 75% after one year. Adverse events were seen in 24% and severe adverse events in 4%. TRIAL REGISTRATION The AID-Registry is funded by the BMBF (01GM08104, 01GM1112D, 01GM1512D).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Bielak
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children’s Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - E. Husmann
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children’s Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - N. Weyandt
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children’s Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - J.-P. Haas
- German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - B. Hügle
- German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany
| | - G. Horneff
- Department of Pediatrics, Asklepios Clinic Sankt Augustin, Centre for Pediatric Rheumatology, Sankt Augustin, Germany ,0000 0000 8852 305Xgrid.411097.aDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescents medicine, Medical faculty, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - U. Neudorf
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children’s Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - T. Lutz
- 0000 0001 0328 4908grid.5253.1Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine/Pediatric Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E. Lilienthal
- 0000 0004 0490 981Xgrid.5570.7Department of Pediatrics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - T. Kallinich
- 0000 0001 2218 4662grid.6363.0Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology and Center for Chronically Sick Children of the Charité, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - K. Tenbrock
- 0000 0001 0728 696Xgrid.1957.aDepartment of Pediatric Pneumology, Allergology and Immunology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - R. Berendes
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, St. Marien’s Children’s Hospital Landshut, Landshut, Germany
| | - T. Niehues
- HELIOS Children’s Hospital Krefeld, Pediatric Immunology and Rheumatology, Krefeld, Germany
| | - H. Wittkowski
- 0000 0001 2172 9288grid.5949.1Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - E. Weißbarth-Riedel
- 0000 0001 2180 3484grid.13648.38Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children’s Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - G. Heubner
- Children’s Hospital Dresden-Neustadt, Dresden, Germany
| | - P. Oommen
- 0000 0001 2176 9917grid.411327.2Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Center for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - J. Klotsche
- 0000 0000 9323 8675grid.418217.9German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Foell
- 0000 0001 2172 9288grid.5949.1Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - E. Lainka
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University Children’s Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shepherd J, Cooper K, Harris P, Picot J, Rose M. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2018; 20:1-222. [PMID: 27135404 DOI: 10.3310/hta20340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is characterised by joint pain, swelling and a limitation of movement caused by inflammation. Subsequent joint damage can lead to disability and growth restriction. Treatment commonly includes disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), such as methotrexate. Clinical practice now favours newer drugs termed biologic DMARDs where indicated. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four biologic DMARDs [etanercept (Enbrel(®), Pfizer), abatacept (Orencia(®), Bristol-Myers Squibb), adalimumab (Humira(®), AbbVie) and tocilizumab (RoActemra(®), Roche) - with or without methotrexate where indicated] for the treatment of JIA (systemic or oligoarticular JIA are excluded). DATA SOURCES Electronic bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for published studies from inception to May 2015 for English-language articles. Bibliographies of related papers, systematic reviews and company submissions were screened and experts were contacted to identify additional evidence. REVIEW METHODS Systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness, health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness were undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. A cost-utility decision-analytic model was developed to compare the estimated cost-effectiveness of biologic DMARDs versus methotrexate. The base-case time horizon was 30 years and the model took a NHS perspective, with costs and benefits discounted at 3.5%. RESULTS Four placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria for the clinical effectiveness review (one RCT evaluating each biologic DMARD). Only one RCT included UK participants. Participants had to achieve an American College of Rheumatology Pediatric (ACR Pedi)-30 response to open-label lead-in treatment in order to be randomised. An exploratory adjusted indirect comparison suggests that the four biologic DMARDs are similar, with fewer disease flares and greater proportions of ACR Pedi-50 and -70 responses among participants randomised to continued biologic DMARDs. However, confidence intervals were wide, the number of trials was low and there was clinical heterogeneity between trials. Open-label extensions of the trials showed that, generally, ACR responses remained constant or even increased after the double-blind phase. The proportions of adverse events and serious adverse events were generally similar between the treatment and placebo groups. Four economic evaluations of biologic DMARDs for patients with JIA were identified but all had limitations. Two quality-of-life studies were included, one of which informed the cost-utility model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab versus methotrexate were £38,127, £32,526 and £38,656 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), respectively. The ICER for abatacept versus methotrexate as a second-line biologic was £39,536 per QALY. LIMITATIONS The model does not incorporate the natural history of JIA in terms of long-term disease progression, as the current evidence is limited. There are no head-to-head trials of biologic DMARDs, and clinical evidence for specific JIA subtypes is limited. CONCLUSIONS Biologic DMARDs are superior to placebo (with methotrexate where permitted) in children with (predominantly) polyarticular course JIA who have had an insufficient response to previous treatment. Randomised comparisons of biologic DMARDs with long-term efficacy and safety follow-up are needed to establish comparative effectiveness. RCTs for JIA subtypes for which evidence is lacking are also required. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015016459. FUNDING The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Shepherd
- Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre (SHTAC), University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cimaz R, Marino A, Martini A. How I treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A state of the art review. Autoimmun Rev 2017; 16:1008-1015. [DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2017.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
27
|
El Gazzar II, Fathy HM, Gheita TA, Nour El-Din AM, Rasheed EA, Bassyouni RH, Kenawy SA. Tumor necrosis factor-α -308 A/G gene polymorphism in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: relation to disease activity, damage, and functional status. Clin Rheumatol 2017; 36:1757-1763. [PMID: 28593608 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-017-3719-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The study aims to evaluate the clinical significance of serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and -308 A/G promoter polymorphism in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients and find any association to the subsets, clinical and laboratory features, disease activity, and damage as well as functional disability. Forty-eight JIA children and 30 controls were included in the present study. Juvenile arthritis disease activity score in 27 joints (JADAS-27) was calculated, juvenile arthritis damage index (JADI) was assessed, and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) measured the functional status. Serum TNF-α was assayed by ELISA and gene (-308) promoter polymorphism was determined by polymerase chain reaction. The 48 JIA children (mean age 11.5 ± 2.8 years) were 13 systemic, 17 oligoarticular, and 18 polyarticular onset. The serum TNF-α was significantly higher in patients (90.4 ± 6.3 ng/ml) compared to control (3.5 ± 2.6 ng/ml) (p < 0.0001) with a tendency to be higher in the polyarticular subtype. All controls had TNF-α -308 GG alleles. The frequency of GG genotype tended to be higher in systemic onset compared to oligoarticular and polyarticular subtypes. The serum TNF-α significantly correlated with JADAS-27 (r = 0.32, p = 0.03) and CHAQ (r = 0.37, p = 0.01) and negatively with the presence of GG alleles (r = -0.48, p = 0.001). The GG alleles were significantly negatively associated with C-reactive protein (r = -0.32, p = 0.03) with a tendency to negatively correlate with JADAS-27, CHAQ, and JADI-extrarticular (r = -0.28, p = 0.06; r = -0.25, p = 0.09 and r = -0.25, p = 0.09, respectively). There is evidence of a possible influence of the -308 SNP promoter position on the production of TNF-α, the severity of JIA which may consequently influence the response to anti-TNF-α treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman I El Gazzar
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Hanan M Fathy
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Faiyum, Egypt
| | - Tamer A Gheita
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | | | - Enas Abdel Rasheed
- Clinical Pathology Department, National Research Centre (NRC), Giza, Egypt
| | - Rasha H Bassyouni
- Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Faiyum, Egypt
| | - Sanaa A Kenawy
- Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University; PhD Royal College of Surgeons, London University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Beukelman T, Anink J, Berntson L, Duffy C, Ellis JA, Glerup M, Guzman J, Horneff G, Kearsley-Fleet L, Klein A, Klotsche J, Magnusson B, Minden K, Munro JE, Niewerth M, Nordal E, Ruperto N, Santos MJ, Schanberg LE, Thomson W, van Suijlekom-Smit L, Wulffraat N, Hyrich K. A survey of national and multi-national registries and cohort studies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: challenges and opportunities. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2017; 15:31. [PMID: 28424093 PMCID: PMC5395903 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-017-0161-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 04/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To characterize the existing national and multi-national registries and cohort studies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and identify differences as well as areas of potential future collaboration. METHODS We surveyed investigators from North America, Europe, and Australia about existing JIA cohort studies and registries. We excluded cross-sectional studies. We captured information about study design, duration, location, inclusion criteria, data elements and collection methods. RESULTS We received survey results from 18 studies, including 11 national and 7 multi-national studies representing 37 countries in total. Study designs included inception cohorts, prevalent disease cohorts, and new treatment cohorts (several of which contribute to pharmacosurveillance activities). Despite numerous differences, the data elements collected across the studies was quite similar, with most studies collecting at least 5 of the 6 American College of Rheumatology core set variables and the data needed to calculate the 3-variable clinical juvenile disease activity score. Most studies were collecting medication initiation and discontinuation dates and were attempting to capture serious adverse events. CONCLUSION There is a wide-range of large, ongoing JIA registries and cohort studies around the world. Our survey results indicate significant potential for future collaborative work using data from different studies and both combined and comparative analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Beukelman
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
- Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1600 7th Avenue South, CPP 210, Birmingham, AL 35233-1711 USA
| | | | | | - Ciaran Duffy
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Justine A. Ellis
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Genes, Environment & Complex Disease, Parkville, Australia
| | - Mia Glerup
- Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jaime Guzman
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gerd Horneff
- Asklepios Klinik Sankt Augsutin, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | | | - Ariane Klein
- Asklepios Klinik Sankt Augsutin, Sankt Augustin, Germany
| | | | - Bo Magnusson
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Ellen Nordal
- University Hospital of North Norway, Tromso, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nico Wulffraat
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kimme Hyrich
- University of Manchester and Central Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee WJ, Briars L, Lee TA, Calip GS, Suda KJ, Schumock GT. Use of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Inhibitors in Children and Young Adults With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis or Rheumatoid Arthritis. Pharmacotherapy 2016; 36:1201-1209. [DOI: 10.1002/phar.1856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Ju Lee
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
| | - Leslie Briars
- Department of Pharmacy Practice; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
| | - Todd A. Lee
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
| | - Gregory S. Calip
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
| | - Katie J. Suda
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare; Hines VA Hospital; Hines Illinois
| | - Glen T. Schumock
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
- Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research; College of Pharmacy; University of Illinois at Chicago; Chicago Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Blazina Š, Markelj G, Avramovič MZ, Toplak N, Avčin T. Management of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Clinical Guide. Paediatr Drugs 2016; 18:397-412. [PMID: 27484749 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-016-0186-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic rheumatic disease of childhood. The outcome in patients with JIA has markedly improved with the advent of biologic drugs. Although early aggressive therapy with biologics seems to be very effective, this approach leads to overtreatment in patients who would respond to classic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Therefore, methotrexate remains first-line long-term therapy for most children with polyarticular JIA. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors have shown tremendous benefit in children with refractory non-systemic JIA. Similar effects have been observed with interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 blockade in patients with systemic JIA. Correct choice and timely use of available medications to achieve early and sustained remission with as few side effects as possible remain challenges for the treating physician. In this review, a practical, clinically oriented guide to the management of JIA is provided, focusing on pharmacological treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, intra-articular and systemic corticosteroids, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and biologic agents. In addition, issues regarding treatment failure, early aggressive treatment, and drug tapering are discussed, with alternative treatment options being suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Štefan Blazina
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gašper Markelj
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mojca Zajc Avramovič
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nataša Toplak
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tadej Avčin
- Department of Allergology, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Bohoričeva 20, 1525, Ljubljana, Slovenia. .,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Beukelman T, Xie F, Baddley JW, Chen L, Mannion ML, Saag KG, Zhang J, Curtis JR. The risk of hospitalized infection following initiation of biologic agents versus methotrexate in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2016; 18:210. [PMID: 27655411 PMCID: PMC5032246 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-016-1109-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the present study, we compared the incidence of hospitalized infection among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) following initiation of treatment with biologic agents versus methotrexate (MTX). Methods We used national Medicaid claims data from 2000 through 2010 to create cohorts of children with JIA who were new users of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), anakinra, and MTX (without concurrent biologic agent use) as defined by a 6-month baseline period of nonuse. Because most anakinra users have systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA), we used claims to identify MTX users who likely had SJIA. Among TNFi users, concurrent MTX use was a time-varying covariate. The study outcome was a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of infection. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) to compare infection rates between biologic agents and MTX. Results We identified 3075 new MTX users (160 with SJIA), 2713 new TNFi users, and 247 new anakinra users. There was no increased risk of infection associated with TNFi monotherapy versus MTX (aHR 1.19, 95 % CI 0.72–1.94) or with TNFi + MTX combination therapy versus MTX (aHR 1.23, 95 % CI 0.69–2.17). Baseline high-dose oral glucocorticoid use (≥10 mg/day of prednisone) was associated with infection (aHR 2.03 [95 % CI 1.21–3.39] versus no oral glucocorticoid). Anakinra was associated with infection versus MTX (aHR 3.53 95 % CI 1.83–6.82), but less so compared with MTX users with SJIA (aHR 2.69, 95 % CI 0.82–8.82). Conclusions Neither TNFi monotherapy nor TNFi + MTX combination therapy was significantly associated with hospitalized infection compared with MTX. Anakinra was significantly associated with infection, but there was likely residual confounding by disease phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Beukelman
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
| | - Fenglong Xie
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - John W Baddley
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Lang Chen
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Melissa L Mannion
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Kenneth G Saag
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Jie Zhang
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Jeffrey R Curtis
- The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Quartier P. Choice of biologic drug among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 55:1534-5. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
33
|
Knickelbein JE, Armbrust KR, Kim M, Sen HN, Nussenblatt RB. Pharmacologic Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2016; 242:231-268. [PMID: 27848029 DOI: 10.1007/164_2016_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Uveitis encompasses a spectrum of diseases whose common feature is intraocular inflammation, which may be infectious or noninfectious in etiology (Nussenblatt and Whitcup 2010). Infectious causes of uveitis are typically treated with appropriate antimicrobial therapy and will not be discussed in this chapter. Noninfectious uveitides are thought have an autoimmune component to their etiology and are thus treated with anti-inflammatory agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared E Knickelbein
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10 Room 10N109, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Karen R Armbrust
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10 Room 10N109, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Meredith Kim
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10 Room 10N109, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - H Nida Sen
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10 Room 10N109, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Robert B Nussenblatt
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10 Room 10N109, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|