Sex Differences in Odds of Brain Metastasis and Outcomes by Brain Metastasis Status after Advanced Melanoma Diagnosis

Sex differences in cancer are well-established. However, less is known about sex differences in diagnosis of brain metastasis and outcomes among patients with advanced melanoma. Using a United States nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database, we evaluated patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma from 1 January 2011-30 July 2022 who received an oncologist-defined rule-based first line of therapy (n = 7969, 33% female according to EHR, 35% w/documentation of brain metastases). The odds of documented brain metastasis diagnosis were calculated using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, practice type, diagnosis period (pre/post-2017), ECOG performance status, anatomic site of melanoma, group stage, documentation of non-brain metastases prior to first-line of treatment, and BRAF positive status. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS) starting from first-line initiation were assessed by sex, accounting for brain metastasis diagnosis as a time-varying covariate using the Cox proportional hazards model, with the same adjustments as the logistic model, excluding group stage, while also adjusting for race, socioeconomic status, and insurance status. Adjusted analysis revealed males with advanced melanoma were 22% more likely to receive a brain metastasis diagnosis compared to females (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09, 1.36). Males with brain metastases had worse rwOS (aHR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.28) but not worse rwPFS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.14) following first-line treatment initiation. Among patients with advanced melanoma who were not diagnosed with brain metastases, survival was not different by sex (rwOS aHR: 1.06 [95% CI: 0.97, 1.16], rwPFS aHR: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.94, 1.1]). This study showed that males had greater odds of brain metastasis and, among those with brain metastasis, poorer rwOS compared to females, while there were no sex differences in clinical outcomes for those with advanced melanoma without brain metastasis.

Racialized economic segregation and inequities in treatment initiation and survival among patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Racialized economic segregation, a form of structural racism, may drive persistent inequities among patients with breast cancer. We examined whether a composite area-level index of racialized economic segregation was associated with real-world treatment and survival in metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among adult women with mBC using a US nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database (2011-2022). Population-weighted quintiles of the index of concentration at the extremes were estimated using census tract data. To identify inequities in time to treatment initiation (TTI) and overall survival (OS), we employed Kaplan-Meier methods and estimated hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for clinical factors.

RESULTS

The cohort included 27,459 patients. Compared with patients from the most privileged areas, those from the least privileged areas were disproportionately Black (36.9% vs. 2.6%) or Latinx (13.2% vs. 2.6%) and increasingly diagnosed with de novo mBC (33.6% vs. 28.9%). Those from the least privileged areas had longer median TTI than those from the most privileged areas (38 vs 31 days) and shorter median OS (29.7 vs 39.2 months). Multivariable-adjusted HR indicated less timely treatment initiation (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83, 0.91, p < 0.01) and worse OS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.13, 1.25, p < 0.01) among those from the least privileged areas compared to the most privileged areas.

CONCLUSION

Racialized economic segregation is a social determinant of health associated with treatment and survival inequities in mBC. Public investments directly addressing racialized economic segregation and other forms of structural racism are needed to reduce inequities in cancer care and outcomes.

Socioecologic Factors and Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Multigene Prognostic Scores in US Women

Importance

Disproportionately aggressive tumor biology among non-Hispanic Black women with early-stage, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer contributes to racial disparities in breast cancer mortality. It is unclear whether socioecologic factors underlie racial differences in breast tumor biology.

Objective

To examine individual-level (insurance status) and contextual (area-level socioeconomic position and rural or urban residence) factors as possible mediators of racial and ethnic differences in the prevalence of ER-positive breast tumors with aggressive biology, as indicated by a high-risk gene expression profile.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study included women 18 years or older diagnosed with stage I to II, ER-positive breast cancer between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015. All data analyses were conducted between December 2022 and April 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the likelihood of a high-risk recurrence score (RS) (≥26) on the Oncotype DX 21-gene breast tumor prognostic genomic biomarker.

Results

Among 69 139 women (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [10.5] years; 6310 Hispanic [9.1%], 274 non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaskan Native [0.4%], 6017 non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander [8.7%], 5380 non-Hispanic Black [7.8%], and 51 158 non-Hispanic White [74.0%]) included in our analysis, non-Hispanic Black (odds ratio [OR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.23-1.43) and non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native women (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.86) had greater likelihood of a high-risk RS compared with non-Hispanic White women. There were no significant differences among other racial and ethnic groups. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, there were greater odds of a high-risk RS for non-Hispanic Black women residing in urban areas (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.24-1.46), but not among rural residents (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.77-1.41). Mediation analysis demonstrated that lack of insurance, county-level disadvantage, and urban vs rural residence partially explained the greater odds of a high-risk RS among non-Hispanic Black women (proportion mediated, 17%; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that the consequences of structural racism extend beyond inequities in health care to drive disparities in breast cancer outcome. Additional research is needed with more comprehensive social and environmental measures to better understand the influence of social determinants on aggressive ER-positive tumor biology among racial and ethnic minoritized women from disadvantaged and historically marginalized communities.

Risk of contralateral breast cancer among Asian/Pacific Islander women in the United States

PURPOSE

While breast cancer studies often aggregate Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women, as a single group or exclude them, this population is heterogeneous in terms of genetic background, environmental exposures, and health-related behaviors, potentially resulting in different cancer outcomes. Our purpose was to evaluate risks of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) among subgroups of API women with breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women ages 18 + years diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer between 2000 and 2016 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. API subgroups included Chinese, Japanese, Filipina, Native Hawaiian, Korean, Vietnamese, Indian/Pakistani, and other API women. Asynchronous CBC was defined as breast cancer diagnosed in the opposite breast 12 + months after first primary unilateral breast cancer. Multivariable-adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and stratified by API subgroups.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 44,362 API women with breast cancer, 25% were Filipina, 18% were Chinese, 14% were Japanese, and 8% were Indian/Pakistani. API women as an aggregate group had increased risk of CBC (SHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08-1.22) compared to NHW women, among whom Chinese (SHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.08-1.40), Filipina (SHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.52), and Native Hawaiian (SHR 1.69, 95% CI 1.37-2.08) women had greater risks.

CONCLUSION

Aggregating or excluding API patients from breast cancer studies ignores their heterogeneous health outcomes. To advance cancer health equity among API women, future research should examine inequities within the API population to design interventions that can adequately address their unique differences.

Guideline concordance and antibiotic-associated adverse events between Veterans administration and non-Veterans administration dental settings: a retrospective cohort study

Background: Antibiotics prescribed as infection prophylaxis prior to dental procedures have the potential for serious adverse drug events (ADEs). However, the extent to which guideline concordance and different dental settings are associated with ADEs from antibiotic prophylaxis is unknown. Aim: The purpose was to assess guideline concordance and antibiotic-associated ADEs and whether it differs by VA and non-VA settings. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed to adults with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints from 2015 to 2017. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to assess the impact of ADEs, guideline concordance and dental setting. An interaction term of concordance and dental setting evaluated whether the relationship between ADEs and concordance differed by setting. Results: From 2015 to 2017, 61,124 patients with antibiotic prophylaxis were identified with 62 (0.1%) having an ADE. Of those with guideline concordance, 18 (0.09%) had an ADE while 44 (0.1%) of those with a discordant antibiotic had an ADE (unadjusted OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.49-1.45). Adjusted analyses showed that guideline concordance was not associated with ADEs (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.25-2.46), and this relationship did not differ by dental setting (Wald χ^2 p-value for interaction = 0.601). Conclusion: Antibiotic-associated ADEs did not differ by setting or guideline concordance.

Reduction in Breast Cancer Death With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Among US Women According to Race, Ethnicity, and the 21-Gene Recurrence Score

BACKGROUND

We previously showed the 21-gene breast recurrence score (RS) has lower prognostic accuracy for non-Hispanic Black (NHB) compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical validity of the RS for predicting chemotherapy benefit as recommended in the current NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer among women from diverse racial/ethnic groups.

METHODS

Using the SEER Oncotype database, we estimated propensity score-weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for breast cancer death with chemotherapy for women with ER-positive/HER2-negative, AJCC stages I-II, axillary node-negative, invasive breast cancer according to race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

We included 6,033 (8.2%) Asian/Pacific Islander (API), 5,697 (7.8%) NHB, 6,688 (9.1%) Hispanic, and 54,945 (74.9%) NHW women. Breast cancer death was reduced with chemotherapy for NHB (HR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.28-0.81), Hispanic (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.94), and NHW (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99) women with an RS of 26 to 100. There was a nonsignificant reduction for API women (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.28-1.24). For women with an RS of 11 to 25, there was no reduction in death for any racial/ethnic group. Among women aged ≤50 years, the reduction in breast cancer death with chemotherapy differed according to race (NHB: HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.20-0.67]; NHW: HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.44-0.74]; Pinteraction for chemotherapy * race <.0499). An exploratory subgroup analysis found that young NHB women may benefit from chemotherapy at a lower RS cutoff than other women.

CONCLUSIONS

The RS was clinically validated as a predictive biomarker for NHB, Hispanic, and NHW women with ER-positive, axillary node-negative breast cancer, but it may underestimate the benefit of chemotherapy for young NHB women. If this finding is confirmed, the RS cutoff for recommending adjuvant chemotherapy for young NHB women with ER-positive, axillary node-negative breast cancer may need to be lower than for other women.

Sociodemographic associations with uptake of novel therapies for acute myeloid leukemia

Inequitable uptake of novel therapies (NT) in non-cancer settings are known for patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES), People of Color (POC), and older adults. NT uptake equity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is not well known. We performed a retrospective cohort study (1/2014-8/2022) of the United States nationwide Flatiron HealthTM electronic health record-derived, de-identified database. We estimated sociodemographic associations with AML NT receipt using incidence rate ratios (IRR). Odds ratios (OR) assessed differences in venetoclax (the most common NT) receipt at community sites and between site characteristics and NT adoption. Of 8081 patients (139 sites), 3102 (38%) received a NT. NT use increased annually (IRR 1.14, 95% confidence interval [1.07, 1.22]). NT receipt was similar between Non-Hispanic-Whites and POC (IRR 1.03, [0.91, 1.17]) and as age increased (IRR 1.02 [0.97, 1.07]). At community sites, Non-Hispanic-Whites were less likely to receive venetoclax (OR 0.77 [0.66, 0.91]); older age (OR 1.05 [1.04, 1.05]) and higher area-level SES were associated with venetoclax receipt (OR 1.23 [1.05, 1.43]). Early NT adopting sites had more prescribing physicians (OR 1.25 [1.13, 1.43]) and higher SES strata patients (OR 2.81 [1.08, 7.66]). Inequities in AML NT uptake were seen by SES; for venetoclax, differential uptake reflects its label indication for older adults and those with comorbidities.

Sociodemographic Inequities in Telemedicine Use Among US Patients Initiating Treatment in Community Cancer Centers During the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-2022

PURPOSE

Although telemedicine was seen as a way to improve cancer care during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, there is limited information regarding inequities in its uptake. This study assessed sociodemographic factors associated with telemedicine use among patients initiating treatment for 20 common cancers.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used deidentified electronic health record-derived patient data from a nationwide network of community cancer practices, linked to area-level Census information. We included adults (age 18 years and older) who initiated first-line systemic cancer treatment between March 2020 and December 2022 (follow-up through March 2023). Exposures include race/ethnicity, insurance status, and area-level social determinants of health (eg, block group socioeconomic status [SES]). The outcome was telemedicine use within 90 days after treatment initiation. Associations were examined using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, performance status, stage, and cancer type.

RESULTS

This study included 36,993 patients (48.6% women; median age, 69 years), of whom 15.1% used telemedicine services. Black (12.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88]) and uninsured (9.2%; OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.48 to 0.73]) patients were less likely to use telemedicine services than their White and well-insured counterparts (14.5% and 15.0%, respectively). Patients in rural (9.7%; OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.57]), suburban (11.8%; OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.74]), and low SES areas (9.9%; OR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.43]) were less also likely to use telemedicine than their counterparts in urban (16.6%) or high SES (21.6%) areas.

CONCLUSION

Nearly one sixth of patients initiating cancer treatment during the pandemic used telemedicine, but there were substantial inequities. The proliferation of telemedicine may perpetuate cancer care inequities if marginalized populations do not have equitable access.

Patterns of prescription opioid use and opioid-related harms among adult patients with hematologic malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Treatment advances for hematologic malignancies (HM) have dramatically improved life expectancy, necessitating greater focus on long-term cancer pain management. This study explored real-world patterns of opioid use among patients with HM.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified adults diagnosed with HM from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2019 using the Truven MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. Across several HM types, we described rates of high-risk opioid use (based on Pharmacy Quality Alliance measures) and opioid-related harms, including incident opioid use disorder (OUD) diagnoses and opioid-related hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits. We used multivariable Cox regression to generate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals comparing the risk of opioid-related harms between patients with versus without high-risk opioid use.

RESULTS

Our sample included 43,190 patients with HM. Median age at HM diagnosis was 54 years (interquartile range  =  44-60). Most patients (61.9%) were diagnosed with lymphoma. Approximately half (49.2%) had an opioid dispensed in the follow-up period. Among all patients, 20.0% met criteria for high-risk opioid use, 0.9% had an OUD diagnosis, and 0.3% experienced an opioid-related hospitalization/ED visit in follow-up. High-risk opioid use increased the risk of an OUD diagnosis by 3.3 times (p < 0.0001) and an opioid-related hospitalization/ED visit 4.2 times (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

High-risk opioid use was prevalent among patients with HM and significantly increased the risk of opioid-related harms. However, rates of opioid-related harms were low. These findings highlight the importance of continually monitoring pain and opioid use throughout HM survivorship to provide safe, effective HM pain management.

Changes in antibiotic prescribing by dentists in the United States, 2012-2019

OBJECTIVES

Dentists prescribe 10% of all outpatient antibiotics in the United States and are the top specialty prescriber. Data on current antibiotic prescribing trends are scarce. Therefore, we evaluated trends in antibiotic prescribing rates by dentists, and we further assessed whether these trends differed by agent, specialty, and by patient characteristics.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of dental antibiotic prescribing included data from the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Data set from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2019.

METHODS

The change in the dentist prescribing rate and mean days' supply were evaluated using linear regression models.

RESULTS

Dentists wrote >216 million antibiotic prescriptions between 2012 and 2019. The annual dental antibiotic prescribing rate remained steady over time (P = .5915). However, the dental prescribing rate (antibiotic prescriptions per 1,000 dentists) increased in the Northeast (by 1,313 antibiotics per 1,000 dentists per year), among oral and maxillofacial surgeons (n = 13,054), prosthodontists (n = 2,381), endodontists (n = 2,255), periodontists (n = 1,961), and for amoxicillin (n = 2,562; P < .04 for all). The mean days' supply significantly decreased over the study period by 0.023 days per 1,000 dentists per year (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2012 to 2019, dental prescribing rates for antibiotics remained unchanged, despite decreases in antibiotic prescribing nationally and changes in guidelines during the study period. However, mean days' supply decreased over time. Dental specialties, such as oral and maxillofacial surgeons, had the highest prescribing rate with increases over time. Antibiotic stewardship efforts to improve unnecessary prescribing by dentists and targeting dental specialists may decrease overall antibiotic prescribing rates by dentists.

Impact of Hydrocodone Rescheduling on Dental Prescribing of Opioids

INTRODUCTION

In the United States, dentists frequently prescribe hydrocodone. In October 2014, the US Drug Enforcement Administration rescheduled hydrocodone from controlled substance schedule III to II, introducing more restricted prescribing and dispensing regulations, which may have changed dental prescribing of opioids.

OBJECTIVE

The study aim was to evaluate the impact of the hydrocodone rescheduling on dental prescribing of opioids in the United States.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of opioids prescribed by dentists between October 2012 and October 2016, using the IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Dataset. Monthly dentist-based opioid prescribing rate (opioid prescription [Rx]/1,000 dentists) and monthly average opioid dosages per prescription (mean morphine milligram equivalent per day [MME/d]) were measured in the 24 mo before and after hydrocodone rescheduling in October 2014 (index or interruption). An interrupted time-series analysis was conducted using segmented ordinary least square regression models, with Newey-West standard errors to handle autocorrelation.

RESULTS

Dentists prescribed 50,412,942 opioid prescriptions across the 49 mo. Hydrocodone was the most commonly prescribed opioid pre- and postindex (74.9% and 63.8%, respectively), followed by codeine (13.8% and 21.6%), oxycodone (8.1% and 9.5%), and tramadol (2.9% and 4.8%). At index, hydrocodone prescribing immediately decreased by -834.8 Rx/1,000 dentists (95% confidence interval [CI], -1,040.2 to -629.4), with increased prescribing of codeine (421.9; 95% CI, 369.7-474.0), oxycodone (85.3; 95% CI, 45.4-125.2), and tramadol (111.8; 95% CI, 101.4-122.3). The mean MME increased at index for all opioids except for hydrocodone, and dosages subsequently decreased during the postindex period.

CONCLUSION

Following the rescheduling, dentist prescribing of hydrocodone declined while prescribing of nonhydrocodone opioids increased. Understanding the impact of this regulation informs strategies to ensure appropriate prescribing of opioids for dental pain.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

The study findings can be used by policy makers to make informed decisions in developing future risk mitigation strategies aimed to regulate opioid prescribing behaviors. Furthermore, dentist-specific resources and guidelines are needed subsequent to these policies in order to meet the dental population needs.

Socioeconomic status and inequities in treatment initiation and survival among patients with cancer, 2011-2022

BACKGROUND

Lower neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with suboptimal cancer care and reduced survival. Most studies examining cancer inequities across area-level socioeconomic status tend to use less granular or unidimensional measures and pre-date the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we examined the association of area-level socioeconomic status on real-world treatment initiation and overall survival among adults with 20 common cancers.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record-derived deidentified data (Flatiron Health Research Database, 2011-2022) linked to US Census Bureau data from the American Community Survey (2015-2019). Area-level socioeconomic status quintiles (based on a measure incorporating income, home values, rental costs, poverty, blue-collar employment, unemployment, and education information) were computed from the US population and applied to patients based on their mailing address. Associations were examined using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for diagnosis year, age, sex, performance status, stage, and cancer type.

RESULTS

This cohort included 291 419 patients (47.7% female; median age = 68 years). Patients from low-SES areas were younger and more likely to be Black (21.9% vs 3.3%) or Latinx (8.4% vs 3.0%) than those in high-SES areas. Living in low-SES areas (vs high) was associated with lower treatment rates (hazard ratio = 0.94 [95% confidence interval = 0.93 to 0.95]) and reduced survival (median real-world overall survival = 21.4 vs 29.5 months, hazard ratio = 1.20 [95% confidence interval = 1.18 to 1.22]). Treatment and survival inequities were observed in 9 and 19 cancer types, respectively. Area-level socioeconomic inequities in treatment and survival remained statistically significant in the COVID-19 era (after March 2020).

CONCLUSION

To reduce inequities in cancer outcomes, efforts that target marginalized, low-socioeconomic status neighborhoods are necessary.

Racial and Ethnic Inequities in US Oncology Clinical Trial Participation From 2017 to 2022

Importance

There is increasing recognition from regulatory agencies that racial and ethnic representation in clinical trials is inadequate and linked to health inequities. The extent of racial inequities in clinical trial participation is unclear because prior studies have synthesized enrollment data from published trials, which often do not report participant race and ethnicity.

Objective

To evaluate racial and ethnic inequities in oncology clinical trial participation in a contemporary cohort of patients with cancer before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database, which includes data for approximately 280 US cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care). The study included Latinx, non-Latinx Black (hereinafter, Black), and non-Latinx White (reference; hereinafter, White) patients aged 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic colorectal cancer, metastatic breast cancer, multiple myeloma, or metastatic pancreatic cancer between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2022 (follow-up through December 31, 2022). Data analysis was performed between August 1, 2022, and February 7, 2023.

Exposures

Electronic health record-documented race and ethnicity.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was oncology trial participation (ie, receipt of a clinical study drug). Stratified cause-specific hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for likelihood of participation. Participation was assessed overall, by cancer type, and by period of diagnosis (2017-2019 vs 2020-2022).

Results

Of the 50 411 patients in this study, 28 878 (57.3%) were women and 21 533 (42.7%) were men. Black and Latinx patients were younger than White patients, with a median age of 65 (IQR, 57-72), 64 (IQR, 54-73), and 68 (IQR, 60-76) years, respectively. Oncology trial participation was lower among Black patients (307 of 6912 [4.4%]) and Latinx patients (166 of 3973 [4.2%]) relative to White patients (2858 of 39 526 [7.2%]) over the entire study period. Inequities in participation were observed across the 5 cancer types studied, with notably large inequities observed among Black patients (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.81]) and Latinx patients (HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.27-0.77]) with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Moreover, inequities between Black and White patients in terms of participation widened among those diagnosed in the COVID-19 era (2020-2022: HR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.40-0.60] vs 1.00 [95% CI, 0.93-1.09]) relative to those diagnosed before the pandemic (2017-2019: HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.53-0.70] vs 1 [reference]).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that oncology trial participation was lower among Black and Latinx patients relative to White patients across all 5 cancer types examined. These findings, including potentially widening inequities in the COVID-19 era, support the need for regulatory guidance to improve enrollment of participants from historically excluded racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials.

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation

BACKGROUND

Electronic health record (EHR) data represent a critical resource for comparative effectiveness research, allowing investigators to study intervention effects in real-world settings with large patient samples. However, high levels of missingness in confounder variables is common, challenging the perceived validity of EHR-based investigations.

METHODS

We investigated performance of multiple imputation and propensity score (PS) calibration when conducting inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW)-based comparative effectiveness research using EHR data with missingness in confounder variables and outcome misclassification. Our motivating example compared effectiveness of immunotherapy versus chemotherapy treatment of advanced bladder cancer with missingness in a key prognostic variable. We captured complexity in EHR data structures using a plasmode simulation approach to spike investigator-defined effects into resamples of a cohort of 4361 patients from a nationwide deidentified EHR-derived database. We characterized statistical properties of IPTW hazard ratio estimates when using multiple imputation or PS calibration missingness approaches.

RESULTS

Multiple imputation and PS calibration performed similarly, maintaining ≤0.05 absolute bias in the marginal hazard ratio even when ≥50% of subjects had missing at random or missing not at random confounder data. Multiple imputation required greater computational resources, taking nearly 40 times as long as PS calibration to complete. Outcome misclassification minimally increased bias of both methods.

CONCLUSION

Our results support multiple imputation and PS calibration approaches to missingness in missing completely at random or missing at random confounder variables in EHR-based IPTW comparative effectiveness analyses, even with missingness ≥50%. PS calibration represents a computationally efficient alternative to multiple imputation.

Comparison of guideline concordant antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs dental settings among those with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints

BACKGROUND

No research has been conducted to assess whether antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing differs by dental setting. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare the prescribing of antibiotic prophylaxis in Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-Veterans Affairs settings.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of veteran and non-veteran dental patients with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints between 2015-2017. Multivariable log binomial regression analysis was conducted to compare concordant prescribing by setting with a sub-analysis for errors of dosing based on antibiotic duration (i.e., days prescribed).

RESULTS

A total of 61,124 dental visits that received a prophylactic antibiotic were included. Most were male (61.0%), and 55 years of age or older (76.2%). Nearly a third (32.7%) received guideline concordant prophylaxis. VA dental settings had a lower prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing compared to non-VA settings in unadjusted results (unadjusted prevalence ratio [uPR] = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.90-0.95). After adjustment, prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing was higher in those with prosthetic joints in the VA setting (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.59-1.88), with no difference identified in those without a prosthetic joint (aPR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.96-1.01). Concordance of dosing was higher in VA compared to non-VA settings (aPR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

VA has a higher prevalence of guideline concordant prescribing among those with prosthetic joints and when assessing dosing errors. Though the presence of an integrated electronic health record (EHR) may be contributing to these differences, other system or prescriber-related factors may be responsible. Future studies should focus on to what extent the integrated EHR may be responsible for increased guideline concordant prescribing in the VA setting.

Trends in dispensed prescriptions for opioids, sedatives, benzodiazepines, gabapentin, and stimulants to children by general dentists, 2012-2019

PURPOSE

Opioids, benzodiazepines and sedatives can manage dental pain, fear and anxiety but have a narrow margin of safety in children. General dentists may inappropriately prescribe gabapentin and stimulants. National evidence on dispensing rates of these high-alert medicines by dentists to children is limited.

METHODS

We utilize join-point regression to identify changes in fills for opioids, sedatives, benzodiazepines, gabapentin, and stimulants to children <18 years from 2012 to 2019 in a national dataset comprising 92% of dispensed outpatient prescriptions by dentists.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2019, 3.8 million children filled prescriptions for high-alert drugs from general dentists. National quarterly dispensing of high-alert drugs decreased 63.1%, from 10456.0 to 3858.8 days per million. Opioids accounted for 69.4% of high-alert prescriptions. From 2012 to 2019, fills for opioids, sedatives, benzodiazepines, and stimulants decreased by 65.2% (7651.8 to 2662.7), 43.4% (810.9 to 458.7), 43.6% (785.7 to 442.7) and 89.3% (825.6 to 88.6 days per million), respectively. Gabapentin increased 8.1% (121.8 to 131.7 days per million). A significant decrease in high-alert fills occurred in 2016, (-6.0% per quarter vs. -1.6% pre-2016, P-value<0.001), especially for opioids (-7.0% vs. -1.2%, P-value<0.001). Older teenagers (15-17 years) received 42.5% of high-alert prescriptions. Low-income counties in the South were overrepresented among top-prescribing areas in 2019.

CONCLUSIONS

We found promising national decreases in fills for high-alert medicines to children by general dentists from 2012 to 2019. However, older teenagers and children in some counties continued to receive dental opioids at high rates. Future efforts should address non-evidence-based pain management in these groups.

Abstract 805: Association of state-level COVID-19 mortality rates with real-world progression and real-world overall survival among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, 2020-2022

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the delivery of cancer care and outcomes in the United States (US). We examined the association between time-varying state-level weekly COVID-19 mortality and progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to progression (rwTTP), and survival (rwOS) among pts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (advNSCLC).

Methods: This retrospective study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. The cohort included community oncology pts diagnosed with advNSCLC between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 (follow-up through March 30, 2022). We extracted US data on COVID-19 deaths from the COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering at Johns Hopkins University. We calculated state-level weekly COVID-19 death rates as weekly COVID-19 deaths per state population size from the 2019 American Community Survey. We categorized rates into quintiles based on all weekly rates during the observation period. Analyses were restricted to treated pts and indexed to start of first-line therapy. For rwPFS analyses, first occurrence of progression or death was considered an event, and pts were censored at last clinic note date. For rwTTP, only progression (not death) was considered an event, and pts with no event were censored at last clinic note date. For rwOS analyses, pts who did not die were censored at last structured activity. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between weekly time-varying state-level COVID-19 mortality rates and outcomes of rwPFS, rwTTP, and rwOS, adjusted for age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, and state.

Results: Among 7,813 advNSCLC pts, the median age at diagnosis was 70 years, the majority of the cohort was non-Hispanic White (59%), had non-squamous cell histology (68%) and a history of smoking (87%). Compared to pts living in states with the lowest quintile of COVID-19 mortality rates (Q1), pts living in states with the highest COVID-19 mortality (Q5) had worse rwOS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.69) and rwPFS (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33). No association was observed with rwTTP (Q5 vs. Q1: HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90-1.22).

Conclusion: In this study of real-world oncology data, we demonstrated the use of publicly-available COVID-19 mortality data to measure the time-varying impact of COVID-19 severity on outcomes in pts with advNSCLC. Higher state-level COVID-19 mortality rates were associated with worse rwOS and rwPFS among advNSCLC pts. The association with increased mortality among pts with advNSCLC may be related to COVID-19-related mortality or other factors such as pre-existing comorbidities which were not explored in this study.

Citation Format: Maneet Kaur, Christina M. Parrinello, Jenny S. Guadamuz, Trevor J. Royce, Gregory S. Calip. Association of state-level COVID-19 mortality rates with real-world progression and real-world overall survival among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, 2020-2022 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 805.

Association of Social Determinants and Tumor Biology With Racial Disparity in Survival From Early-Stage, Hormone-Dependent Breast Cancer

Importance

Black women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer experience the greatest racial disparity in survival of all breast cancer subtypes. The relative contributions of social determinants of health and tumor biology to this disparity are uncertain.

Objective

To determine the proportion of the Black-White disparity in breast cancer survival from estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, axillary node-negative breast cancer that is associated with adverse social determinants and high-risk tumor biology.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective mediation analysis of factors associated with the racial disparity in breast cancer death for cases diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with follow-up through 2016 was carried out using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Oncotype registry. The study included women in the SEER-18 registry who were aged 18 years or older at diagnosis of a first primary invasive breast cancer tumor that was axillary node-negative and ER-positive, who were Black (Black), non-Hispanic White (White), and for whom the 21-gene breast recurrence score was available. Data analysis took place between March 4, 2021, and November 15, 2022.

Exposures

Census tract socioeconomic disadvantage, insurance status, tumor characteristics including the recurrence score, and treatment variables.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Death due to breast cancer.

Results

The analysis with 60 137 women (mean [IQR] age 58.1 [50-66] years) included 5648 (9.4%) Black women and 54 489 (90.6%) White women. With a median (IQR) follow-up time of 56 (32-86) months, the age-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for breast cancer death among Black compared with White women was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.51-2.20). Neighborhood disadvantage and insurance status together mediated 19% of the disparity (mediated HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.00; P < .001) and tumor biological characteristics mediated 20% (mediated HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.28-1.90; P < .001). A fully adjusted model that included all covariates accounted for 44% of the racial disparity (mediated HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.71; P < .001). Neighborhood disadvantage mediated 8% of the racial difference in the probability of a high-risk recurrence score (P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, racial differences in social determinants of health and indicators of aggressive tumor biology including a genomic biomarker were equally associated with the survival disparity in early-stage, ER-positive breast cancer among US women. Future research should examine more comprehensive measures of socioecological disadvantage, molecular mechanisms underlying aggressive tumor biology among Black women, and the role of ancestry-related genetic variants.

Mediation of Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Diagnosis of Advanced-Stage Cervical Cancer by Insurance Status

Importance

Black and Hispanic or Latina women are more likely than White women to receive a diagnosis of and to die of cervical cancer. Health insurance coverage is associated with diagnosis at an earlier stage of cervical cancer.

Objective

To evaluate the extent to which racial and ethnic differences in the diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer are mediated by insurance status.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, cross-sectional population-based study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program on an analytic cohort of 23 942 women aged 21 to 64 years who received a diagnosis of cervical cancer between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2016. Statistical analysis was performed from February 24, 2022, to January 18, 2023.

Exposures

Health inusurance status (private or Medicare insurance vs Medicaid or uninsured).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer (regional or distant stage). Mediation analyses were performed to assess the proportion of observed racial and ethnic differences in the stage at diagnosis that were mediated by health insurance status.

Results

A total of 23 942 women (median age at diagnosis, 45 years [IQR, 37-54 years]; 12.9% were Black, 24.5% were Hispanic or Latina, and 52.9% were White) were included in the study. A total of 59.4% of the cohort had private or Medicare insurance. Compared with White women, patients of all other racial and ethnic groups had a lower proportion with a diagnosis of early-stage cervical cancer (localized) (American Indian or Alaska Native, 48.7%; Asian or Pacific Islander, 49.9%; Black, 41.7%; Hispanic or Latina, 51.6%; and White, 53.3%). A larger proportion of women with private or Medicare insurance compared with women with Medicaid or uninsured received a diagnosis of an early-stage cancer (57.8% [8082 of 13 964] vs 41.1% [3916 of 9528]). In models adjusting for age, year of diagnosis, histologic type, area-level socioeconomic status, and insurance status, Black women had higher odds of receiving a diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer compared with White women (odds ratio, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.08-1.29]). Health insurance was associated with mediation of more than half (ranging from 51.3% [95% CI, 51.0%-51.6%] for Black women to 55.1% [95% CI, 53.9%-56.3%] for Hispanic or Latina women) the racial and ethnic inequities in the diagnosis of advanced-stage cervical cancer across all racial and ethnic minority groups compared with White women.

Conclusions and Relevance

This cross-sectional study of SEER data suggests that insurance status was a substantial mediator of racial and ethnic inequities in advanced-stage cervical cancer diagnoses. Expanding access to care and improving the quality of services rendered for uninsured patients and those covered by Medicaid may mitigate the known inequities in cervical cancer diagnosis and related outcomes.

Assessing the Contribution of Scanned Outside Documents to the Completeness of Real-World Data Abstraction

PURPOSE

Electronic health record (EHR) data are widely used in precision medicine, quality improvement, disease surveillance, and population health management. However, a significant amount of EHR data are stored in unstructured formats including scanned documents external to the treatment facility presenting an informatics challenge for secondary use. Studies are needed to characterize the clinical information uniquely available in scanned outside documents (SODs) to understand to what extent the availability of such information affects the use of these real-world data for cancer research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent EHR data abstractions capturing 30 variables commonly used in oncology research were conducted for 125 patients treated for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer at a comprehensive cancer center, with and without consideration of SODs. Completeness and concordance were compared between the two abstractions, overall, and by patient groups and variable types.

RESULTS

The overall completeness of the data with SODs was 77.6% as compared with 54.3% for the abstraction without SODs. The differences in completeness were driven by data related to biomarker tests, which were more likely to be uniquely available in SODs. Such data were prone to missingness among patients who were diagnosed externally.

CONCLUSION

There were no major differences in completeness between the two abstractions by demographics, diagnosis, disease progression, performance status, or oral therapy use. However, biomarker data were more likely to be uniquely contained in the SODs. Our findings may help cancer centers prioritize the types of SOD data being abstracted for research or other secondary purposes.

Telemedicine use among patients with metastatic breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic: Differences by race, age, and region

PURPOSE

Our objective was to describe differences in telemedicine use among women with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) by race, age, and geographic region.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of women with recurrent or de novo mBC treated in US community cancer practices that initiated a new line of therapy between March 2020 and February 2021. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to calculate adjusted rate ratios (RR) and robust 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with telemedicine visits within 90 days of therapy initiation.

RESULTS

Overall, among 3412 women with mBC, 751 (22%) patients had telemedicine visits following therapy initiation, with lower risks observed among older women (<50 years: 24%; 50-64 years: 22%; 65-74 years: 21%; ≥75 years: 20%). Greater telemedicine use was observed among Asian women (35%) compared to White (21%), Black (18%), and Hispanic (21%) women. Fewer telemedicine visits occurred in Southern (12%) and Midwestern (17%) states versus Northeastern (37%) or Western (36%) states. In multivariable models, women ages ≥75 years had significantly lower risks of telemedicine visits (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.95) compared to ages <50 years. Compared to patients in Northeastern states, women in Midwestern (RR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.37-0.57) and Southern (RR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.26-0.37) states had significantly lower risks of telemedicine visits; but not women in Western states (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.12). No statistically significant differences in telemedicine use were found between racial groups in overall multivariable models.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of community cancer practices, older mBC patients and those living in Southern and Midwestern states were less likely to have telemedicine visits. Preferences for communication and delivery of care may have implications for measurement of exposures and endpoints in pharmacoepidemiologic studies of cancer patients.

Systemic Anticancer Therapy at the End of Life-Changes in Usage Pattern in the Immunotherapy Era

This cohort study evaluates the rate of systemic anticancer therapy use among patients dying of cancer.

Racial inequities in second-line treatment and overall survival among patients with metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Black women in the USA have a higher incidence and mortality of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) than White women, while Hispanic women have lower rates. Previous studies have focused on first-line (1L) treatment, but little is known about racial differences in treatment beyond 1L and their impact on outcomes.

METHODS

This analysis utilized data from an electronic health record derived de-identified database and included patients with HR+HER2- mBC initiating 2L treatment (including CDK4/6-inhibitor [CDKi]-based, endocrine monotherapy, everolimus combination therapy, and chemotherapy and other systemic therapies) between 2/3/2015 and 7/31/2021. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was defined as time from 2L initiation to death. Multinomial logistic regression assessed the likelihood of 2L treatment between race/ethnicity groups. Median rwOS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and adjusted hazard ratios were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among all patients who received 2L, non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic/Latino patients were less likely to receive 2L CDKi compared to non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (36%, 39% vs 42%, respectively). Median rwOS was 20.4, 37.6, and 25.3 months, in NHB, Hispanic/Latino and NHW patients, respectively. The rwOS remained poorer among NHB patients after adjustment (HR = 1.16; p = 0.009). In stratified analysis, adjusted rwOS was similar between NHB and NHW patients among those who received 1L CDKi.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that among patients with HR+HER2- mBC, NHB patients had worse survival beyond front-line setting, mainly among the subset of women who did not receive CDKi at 1L. This inequities in rwOS between race/ethnicity groups was not observed among patients who received 1L CDKi.

Barriers to and facilitators of opioid prescribing by dentists in the United States: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Dentists in the United States frequently prescribe opioids for dental-related pain, although evidence shows superior efficacy of nonopioids for pain management. A national sample of US dentists was interviewed to understand the barriers and facilitators to opioid prescribing.

METHODS

Semistructured one-on-one telephone interviews were conducted with dentists sampled from the 6 regions of The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Responses were coded into the domains of the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Model of Behavior. Potential behavior change interventions were identified for targeted themes.

RESULTS

Seventy-three interviews were qualitatively analyzed. Most of those interviewed were general dentists (86.3%) and on average (SD) were in practice for 24.3 (13.0) years. Ten themes were identified within the Capability, Opportunity and Motivation Model of Behavior. Dentists' knowledge of opioid risk, ability to identify substance use disorder behavior, and capability of communicating pain management plans to patients or following clinic policies or state and federal regulations were linked with judicious opioid prescribing. Dentists reported prescribing opioids if they determined clinical necessity or feared negative consequences for refusing to prescribe opioids.

CONCLUSIONS

Dentists' opioid decision making is influenced by a range of real-world practice experiences and patient and clinic factors. Education and training that target dentists' knowledge gaps and changes in dentists' practice environment can encourage effective communication of pain management strategies with patients and prescribing of nonopioids as first-line analgesics while conserving opioid use.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Identified knowledge gaps in dentistry can be targets for education, clinical guidelines, and policy interventions to ensure safe and appropriate prescribing of opioids.

Serious opioid-related adverse outcomes associated with opioids prescribed by dentists

ABSTRACT

Although nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs are superior to opioids in dental pain management, opioids are still prescribed for dental pain in the United States. Little is known about the serious adverse outcomes of short-acting opioids within the context of dental prescribing. The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse outcomes and persistent opioid use (POU) after opioid prescriptions by dentists, based on whether opioids were overprescribed or within recommendations. A cross-sectional analysis of adults with a dental visit and corresponding opioid prescription (index) from 2011 to 2018 within a nationwide commercial claims database was conducted. Opioid overprescribing was defined as >120 morphine milligram equivalents per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess adverse outcomes (emergency department visits, hospitalizations, newly diagnosed substance use disorder, naloxone administration, or death within 30 days from index) and POU (≥1 prescription 4-90 days postindex). Predicted probabilities are reported. Of 633,387 visits, 2.6% experienced an adverse outcome and 16.6% had POU. Adverse outcome risk was not different whether opioids were overprescribed or within recommendations (predicted probability 9.0%, confidence interval [CI]: 8.0%-10.2% vs 9.1%, CI: 8.1-10.3), but POU was higher when opioids were overprescribed (predicted probability 27.4%, CI: 26.1%-28.8% vs 25.2%, CI: 24.0%-26.5%). Visits associated with mild pain and those with substance use disorders had the highest risk of both outcomes. Findings from this study demonstrate that dental prescribing of opioids was associated with adverse outcomes and POU, even when prescriptions were concordant with guidelines. Additional efforts are required to improve analgesic prescribing in dentistry, especially in groups at high risk of opioid-related adverse outcomes.

Real world use of radiation for newly diagnosed brain metastases in ALK-positive lung cancer receiving a first line ALK inhibitor

PURPOSE

Management paradigms now allow systemic targeted drugs before central nervous system (CNS)-directed radiotherapy (RT) in selected asymptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM). We aim to quantify how novel targeted agents with improved CNS activity, such as second-generation ALK inhibitors (e.g. alectinib), might impact the role of CNS-directed RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective, observational, real world patterns of care study used a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified longitudinal database. A random sample of patients with ALK+ advanced NSCLC and BM on first-line ALK-inhibitor monotherapy between January 1, 2014 and August 31, 2019 were included. Using an index date of the first instance of BM, the outcome was brain-directed local treatment within four months. Trends over time were reported and tested using multivariable modified Poisson regression with robust error variance, including an indicator of in or after 2017 (when alectinib was approved).

RESULTS

Of 352 patients, 146 had BM. 104 received CNS-directed local therapy and 42 did not. The majority (89.4%) were treated with RT alone. Of those receiving RT, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) monotherapy was the most common (53%) followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone (39%). On multivariable analysis, those patients who had their first BM in or after 2017 had a decreased rate of receiving local BM treatment versus those prior to 2017 with an adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.95; p=0.026). We found no change in the proportion of BM treated with WBRT in or after 2017 vs before (aIRR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.24-2.06; p = 0.517).

CONCLUSIONS

We found decreasing use of CNS-directed RT in patients with NSCLC with new BM on first-line ALK inhibitors. Clinical outcomes for these patients require continued investigation as physicians may be increasingly comfortable deferring upfront local therapy for BM in lieu of novel targeted agents with improved CNS activity.

Trends in Opioid Prescribing by General Dentists and Dental Specialists in the U.S., 2012-2019

INTRODUCTION

Evidence suggests that U.S. dentists prescribe opioids excessively. There are limited national data on recent trends in opioid prescriptions by U.S. dentists. In this study, we examined trends in opioid prescribing by general dentists and dental specialists in the U.S. from 2012 to 2019.

METHODS

Dispensed prescriptions for oral opioid analgesics written by dentists were identified from IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Data from January 2012 through December 2019. Autoregressive integrated moving average and joinpoint regression models described monthly population-based prescribing rates (prescriptions/100,000 individuals), dentist-based prescribing rates (prescriptions/1,000 dentists), and opioid dosages (mean daily morphine milligram equivalents/day). All analyses were performed in 2020.

RESULTS

Over the 8 years, dentists prescribed >87.2 million opioid prescriptions. Population- and dentist-based prescribing rates declined monthly by -1.97 prescriptions/100,000 individuals (95% CI= -9.98, -0.97) and -39.12 prescriptions/1,000 dentists (95% CI= -58.63, -17.65), respectively. Opioid dosages declined monthly by -0.08 morphine milligram equivalents/day (95% CI= -0.13, -0.04). Joinpoint regression identified 4 timepoints (February 2016, May 2017, December 2018, and March 2019) at which monthly prescribing rate trends were often decreasing in greater magnitude than those in the previous time segment.

CONCLUSIONS

Following national trends, dentists became more conservative in prescribing opioids. A greater magnitude of decline occurred post 2016 following the implementation of strategies aimed to further regulate opioid prescribing. Understanding the factors that influence prescribing trends can aid in development of tailored resources to encourage and support a conservative approach by dentists, to prescribing opioids.

Abstract 738: Increasing uptake of direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients initiating immunomodulatory drug-based regimens, 2010 to 2017

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) which results in greater morbidity and mortality in MM patients. Several MM treatments including receiving immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), cytotoxic chemotherapy, and high-dose dexamethasone also increase VTE risk. Clinical guidelines recommend thromboprophylactic regimens to mitigate the risk of VTE in MM patients. However, practices vary with respect to medications used for thromboprophylaxis, ranging from prescribing of aspirin to anticoagulant regimens with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and warfarin. We aimed to describe patterns of warfarin- and DOAC-based thromboprophylaxis in newly diagnosed MM patients initiating IMiD-based treatment.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of MM patients using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental databases. We included newly diagnosed MM patients initiating IMiD-based treatment between 2010 and 2017 with continuous health plan enrollment 12 months prior to and following diagnosis. We collected information on comorbidities, VTE risk factors and other MM therapies. The primary outcome of interest was initiating thromboprophylaxis with warfarin or DOAC within 90 days of treatment initiation. We evaluated prescribing trends over time and characteristics associated with DOAC- or warfarin-based thromboprophylaxis, we used univariate and multivariate multinomial logistic regression models comparing these two forms of thromboprophylaxis to those who did not receive thromboprophylaxis.

Results: In a cohort of 6227 MM patients initiating IMiD-based regimens, the median age was 62 years and 43% were female. Over the entire study period, warfarin-based thromboprophylaxis was more prevalent relative to DOACs (10.5% vs. 6.9%). However, we observed a trend of increasing adoption of DOAC thromboprophylaxis from 2.4% of patients in 2010 to 12.7% in 2017; and the use of warfarin thromboprophylaxis consistently declined over time from 16.5% of patients in 2010 to 3.2% in 2017. In multivariable analyses, trends associated with increasing or decreasing odds of thromboprophylaxis with these agents were robust after adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics including VTE risk factors and other MM treatment (DOAC: OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.28-1.44 and warfarin: OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.86).

Conclusions: Over the study period, our findings indicate that DOAC-based thromobprophylaxis regimens were increasingly used over warfarin-based treatment in newly diagnosed commercially insured MM patients initiating IMiD therapy. Further research is needed to determine whether these patterns are associated with differences in clinical outcomes.

Citation Format: Abdullah I. Abdelaziz, Karen Sweiss, Pritesh R. Patel, Brian C-H Chiu, Gregory S. Calip. Increasing uptake of direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients initiating immunomodulatory drug-based regimens, 2010 to 2017 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 738.

Abstract 3669: Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment with bone-modifying agents among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

Introduction: There are racial/ethnic disparities in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, including differences in the use of novel agents, stem cell transplantation, and supportive therapies such as bone-modifying agents (BMAs). BMAs reduce the frequency of fractures and skeletal-related pain, and some evidence suggests that more recently approved agents (i.e., denosumab) confer greater progression-free survival benefits than older agents (i.e., bisphosphonates). Here we describe disparities in the initiation of BMA use and uptake of denosumab among newly diagnosed MM patients by race/ethnicity.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. This analysis included adults (≥ 18 years) newly diagnosed with MM between January 2018 and September 2021 who initiated first-line therapy. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were determined using structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction. Cumulative incidence functions accounting for competing risks were used to estimate the initiation of BMA use within 90 days before the start of first-line MM therapy and 30 days post. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for differences in the receipt of denosumab versus bisphosphonates alone (zoledronic acid or pamidronate) among patients who initiated BMA use.

Results: Among 4460 newly diagnosed MM patients, 52% were White, 17% were Black, 7% were Latinx, and 2% were Asian. Overall, 2208 (50%) initiated BMA treatment, and utilization differed across racial/ethnic groups with higher rates observed among Asian (55%), White (51%), and Latinx (50%) patients compared to Black patients (44%) (P=0.023). Among patients that initiated BMAs, 53% received denosumab and 47% received bisphosphonates alone. Compared to White patients, Black (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83-1.36) and Asian (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44-1.53) patients had similar odds of receiving denosumab, whereas Latinx patients had significantly lower odds of receiving denosumab (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79).

Conclusion: Among newly diagnosed MM patients, approximately half initiated BMAs. Substantial racial/ethnic disparities exist. For example, Black patients were less likely to receive any BMAs, and, even when treated, Latinx patients were less likely to receive denosumab. Future research should determine whether these treatment disparities impact progression-free and overall survival in real-world MM data.

Citation Format: Jenny S. Guadamuz, Rebecca Rohrer, Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Brian C.-H. Chiu, Pritesh R. Patel, Karen Sweiss, Erlene Seymour, Douglas Sborov, Gregory S. Calip. Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment with bone-modifying agents among newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3669.

Abstract 3668: Socioeconomic disparities in healthcare utilization and overall survival among patients with cancer: Application of area-level socioeconomic status in a nationwide electronic health record-derived database

Introduction: While lower socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with worse cancer outcomes, most electronic health records (EHRs) lack documentation of SES. Here we apply an area-level SES measure to an EHR-derived database to evaluate representativeness according to SES. We then examine socioeconomic disparities in the timeliness of healthcare utilization (biomarker testing and systemic treatment) and overall survival (OS) in 3 common cancers.

Methods: This retrospective study uses the nationwide Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database of cancer patients who have clinical activity between January 2011-August 2021. Census block group data from the American Community Survey (2015-2019) was used to measure SES per the Yost Index (incorporating income, home values, rental costs, poverty, blue-collar employment, unemployment, and education information). SES quintiles were determined from the US population and then applied to patients based on their residential addresses. Our database included 2,067,644 cancer patients from community practices. Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC, n=51,596), metastatic breast cancer (mBC, n=18,268), and multiple myeloma (MM, n=8,246) were sampled and followed from advanced, metastatic, or initial diagnosis date, respectively. Differences were evaluated using Χ2 tests for categorical variables and log-rank tests for Kaplan-Meier survivor functions.

Results: Compared to the US population, our database of cancer patients has a similar SES distribution (differences &lt;3%), capturing cancer patients living in the most (Q1) and least affluent areas (Q5) of the country. Yet, among the 1.5% of cancer patients who participated in clinical trials, only 15.2% lived in the least affluent areas. aNSCLC and mBC patients living in the least affluent areas were less likely to receive biomarker testing within 30 days of index diagnosis than those in the most affluent areas (59.4% vs. 68.7%; 74.9% vs. 81.0%, both p&lt;.01). Similar patterns were observed in receipt of systemic treatment within 60 days of index diagnosis (aNSCLC: 58.9% vs. 64.9%; mBC: 76.0% vs. 80.1%, both p&lt;.01). No differences in healthcare utilization were observed among MM patients. Patients in the least affluent areas had lower median OS (months) than those in the most affluent areas (aNSCLC: 10.8 [95% CI: 10.4-11.3] vs. 12.2 [95% CI: 11.8-12.7]; mBC: 28.0 [95% CI: 26.6-29.5] vs. 34.5 [95% CI: 33.1-36.9], MM: 57.4 [95% CI: 53.5-61.5] vs. 67.5 [95% CI: 62.5-76.4]; all p&lt;.01).

Conclusion: Lower SES was associated with reduced clinical trial participation, less timely healthcare utilization, and worse OS. Making SES available in real-world data can support the development of inclusive clinical trials and inform interventions to reduce cancer care disparities.

Citation Format: Jenny S. Guadamuz, Xiaoliang Wang, Jeremy Snider, James Walters, Rebecca A. Miksad, Gregory S. Calip. Socioeconomic disparities in healthcare utilization and overall survival among patients with cancer: Application of area-level socioeconomic status in a nationwide electronic health record-derived database [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3668.

Abstract 3630: Impact of socioeconomic status on the risk of contralateral breast cancer among Asian/Pacific Islander subgroups

Introduction: Breast cancer survivors have an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), among whom minority breast cancer patients are at increased risk of this adverse outcome. Studies evaluating CBC risk by race/ethnicity frequently aggregate Asian/Pacific Islanders (API) into a single group or exclude them. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the risk of CBC among subgroups of API breast cancer survivors.

Method: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of women ages 18+ years diagnosed with unilateral Stage I-III breast cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Census Tract-level SES and Rurality Database (2000-2016). Women included in the study received cancer-directed surgery and the primary outcome of interest was asynchronous CBC occurring. SES was classified using the Yost index, a validated time-dependent composite score with the 1st quintile representing the lowest and 5th quintile being the highest SES. API women were categorized into Chinese, Japanese, Filipina, Hawaiian, Korean, Vietnamese, Indian/Pakistani, and other Asian/Pacific Islanders. We determined overall associations between SES and the risk of CBC using Fine and Gray regression models accounting for competing risks comparing API women to Non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. Multivariable adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and stratified by API subgroups.

Results: From a cohort of 44,362 API female breast cancer patients included, one quarter of the cohort were Filipina (25%), 18% were Chinese, 14% were Japanese, 8% were Indian/Pakistani, and 17% were other API. API women living in the lowest SES areas were more likely to be uninsured or have Medicaid coverage (21% vs. 6%) and have Stage lll first primary breast cancer (14% vs. 10%) compared to API women living in the highest SES areas. Overall, API breast cancer patients as an aggregate group did not have significantly increased risk of CBC compared to NHW patients. In stratified subgroups, risk estimates for CBC were higher among Chinese women (SHR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.41), Filipina (SHR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23-1.52), and Hawaiian women (SHR 1.67, 95% CI 1.37-2.08) when compared to NHW women after adjusting for demographics and baseline clinical characteristics. Lower SES was not associated with increased CBC risk among API women overall. However, the risk of CBC is significantly lower among Chinese and Vietnamese women and higher among Filipina women who lived in areas lower SES quintile compared to women who lived in area with the highest SES quintile when examining impact of SES within API subgroups.

Conclusion: Chinese, Filipina, and Hawaiian women have higher risk of CBC when compared to NHW. When disaggregated API women into subgroups, the impact of SES on the risk of CBC differs significantly across API subgroups.

Citation Format: Hsiao- Ching Huang, Jenny S. Guadamuz, Kent F. Hoskins, Naomi Y. Ko, Gregory S. Calip. Impact of socioeconomic status on the risk of contralateral breast cancer among Asian/Pacific Islander subgroups [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3630.

Appropriateness of Antibiotic Prophylaxis Before Dental Procedures, 2016-2018

INTRODUCTION

Prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis is common yet unnecessary for many dental visits. In this analysis, our objective was to assess whether the appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis has improved over time.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using dental visits from 2016 to 2018 (data analyzed in 2021) using medical and prescriptions claims data of patients from the U.S. with commercial dental insurance. Antibiotic prophylaxis was defined as a ≤2 days' supply prescription dispensed within 7 days before a dental visit. Appropriateness of prophylaxis was defined on the basis of the manipulation of the gingiva/tooth periapex or oral mucosa perforation in patients with appropriate cardiac diagnoses. Associations between patient and visit characteristics and appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis were assessed using multiple Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Unnecessary antibiotic prophylaxis was highly prevalent in this cohort, ranging from 77.0% in 2016 to 78.5% in 2018. In the adjusted analysis, factors associated with unnecessary antibiotic prophylaxis included younger age, female sex, geographic region, rurality, type of antibiotic, and certain dental procedures. The factors associated with the highest risk of unnecessary prophylaxis in the adjusted analysis were orthodontic procedures and having a history of a prosthetic joint. Notably, the risk of unnecessary antibiotic prophylaxis decreased over time in the adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Unnecessary prescription of antibiotic prophylaxis by dentists continues to be common. Antimicrobial stewardship strategies are needed to improve prescribing by dentists.

Impact of socioeconomic status and rurality on cancer-specific survival among women with de novo metastatic breast cancer by race/ethnicity

PURPOSE

There are approximately 150,000 women living with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in the United States. Disparities in de novo mBC incidence and mortality exist across race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and rurality. However, how SES and rurality independently impact mBC outcomes across different racial/ethnic groups is not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of SES and rurality on cancer-specific mortality among women with mBC by race/ethnicity.

METHODS

We conducted a large, population-based retrospective cohort study in women aged 18 + years diagnosed with de novo mBC using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Census Tract-level SES and Rurality Database (2000-2015). Associations between SES/rurality and cancer-specific mortality were determined using Fine and Gray regression models. Subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by race/ethnicity and hormone receptor (HR) status were calculated.

RESULTS

A cohort of 33,976 women were included with the majority being White (67%), 17% Black, 0.4% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 6% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 10% Latina/Hispanic. We observed the greatest increased risk of BC mortality among Black women with HR-negative mBC residing in neighborhoods with lower SES (lowest versus highest quintile: SHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.00-1.90) and in rural areas compared to urban areas (SHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59).

CONCLUSION

Overall, BC-specific survival among women with de novo mBC differs by race/ethnicity, with the greatest adverse impacts of SES and rurality affecting Black women with HR-negative disease.

Impact of time to distant recurrence on breast cancer-specific mortality in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive early-stage breast cancer (BC) have five-year survival rates of > 90% but remain at serious risk for developing distant metastases beyond five years from diagnosis. This retrospective cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries to examine associations between distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) and risk of BC-specific mortality following distant relapse. The analysis includes 1,057 women with second primary stage IV BC who were initially diagnosed with AJCC stages I–III HR-positive BC between1990 and 2016. Overall, 65% of women had a preceding DRFI of ≥ 5 years. Five-year BC-specific survival following development of distant recurrence was 52% for women with DRFI ≥ 5 years compared to 31% in women with DRFI of < 5 years. In multivariable analyses, risks of cancer-specific mortality following distant recurrence were lower in women with DRFI of 5 years or more (subdistribution hazard ratio = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58–0.89, p = 0.002). The results of this study may inform patient-clinician discussions surrounding prognosis and treatment selection among HR-positive patients who develop a distant recurrence of disease.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Treatment Patterns for Patients With Metastatic Solid Cancer in the United States

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to delays in patients seeking care for life-threatening conditions; however, its impact on treatment patterns for patients with metastatic cancer is unknown. We assessed the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on time to treatment initiation (TTI) and treatment selection for patients newly diagnosed with metastatic solid cancer.

METHODS

We used an electronic health record-derived longitudinal database curated via technology-enabled abstraction to identify 14 136 US patients newly diagnosed with de novo or recurrent metastatic solid cancer between January 1 and July 31 in 2019 or 2020. Patients received care at approximately 280 predominantly community-based oncology practices. Controlled interrupted time series analyses assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic period (April-July 2020) on TTI, defined as the number of days from metastatic diagnosis to receipt of first-line systemic therapy, and use of myelosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

The adjusted probability of treatment within 30 days of diagnosis was similar across periods (January-March 2019 = 41.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 32.2% to 51.1%; April-July 2019 = 42.6%, 95% CI = 32.4% to 52.7%; January-March 2020 = 44.5%, 95% CI = 30.4% to 58.6%; April-July 2020 = 46.8%, 95% CI= 34.6% to 59.0%; adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences = 1.4%, 95% CI = -2.7% to 5.5%). Among 5962 patients who received first-line systemic therapy, there was no association between the pandemic period and use of myelosuppressive therapy (adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences = 1.6%, 95% CI = -2.6% to 5.8%). There was no meaningful effect modification by cancer type, race, or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite known pandemic-related delays in surveillance and diagnosis, the COVID-19 pandemic did not affect TTI or treatment selection for patients with metastatic solid cancers.

Understanding Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Uptake and Outcomes Following Multigene Prognostic Testing in Early Breast Cancer: The Promise of Real-World Data

In the past decades, multigene prognostic testing, such as Oncotype DX (ODX), has been increasingly used to inform treatment decisions for patients with early-stage breast cancer. This advance in precision oncology has increased existing concerns about differential access to genomic testing across racial and ethnic groups. The investigation by Moore and colleagues, analyzing real-world data from the National Cancer Database, shows that patients of color with breast cancer were less likely to receive ODX testing and Black patients were more likely to have a high risk Recurrence Score (RS) compared with White patients. This study emphasizes that the appropriate adoption of ODX testing is critical to promote equitable cancer care for patients with breast cancer. The reported associations on overall survival across specific racial and ethnic groups provided here give additional insight to the known associations between the ODX RS and outcomes of distant recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Analyses of contemporary, real-world data from diverse populations with long-term follow-up should continue to keep pace with the expansion of precision breast cancer care to better understand and mitigate potentially widening inequities in genomic testing. See related article by Moore et al., p. 821.

The association between physical health-related quality of life, physical functioning, and risk of contralateral breast cancer among older women

BACKGROUND

Physical limitations prior to cancer diagnosis may lead to suboptimal health outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate the impacts of poor physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and physical functioning (PF) on the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC).

METHODS

We performed a nested case-control study of women with invasive unilateral breast cancer (UBC) who did not receive prophylactic contralateral mastectomy using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare Health Outcomes Survey data resource. Among 2938 women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with first stage I-III UBC between 1997 and 2011, we identified 100 subsequent CBC cases and 915 matched controls without CBC using incidence density sampling without replacement. Pre-diagnosis physical HRQOL and PF were determined using Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form-36 (SF-36)/Veterans Rand 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) responses within 2 years prior to first UBC diagnosis. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Cases and controls were similar with respect to comorbidities, stage, surgery, and radiation treatments, but differed by hormone receptor status (ER/PR-negative, 23% and 11%, respectively) of first UBC. Cases had modestly lower mean pre-diagnosis physical HRQOL (- 1.8) and PF (- 2.2) scores. In multivariable models, we observed an increased CBC risk associated with low physical HRQOL (lowest vs. highest quartile, OR = 1.8; 95% CI 0.8-4.3), but CIs included 1.0. Low PF was associated with a 2.7-fold (95% CI 1.1-6.7) increased CBC risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that low physical HRQOL, specifically poor PF, is associated with CBC risk. Efforts to understand and minimize declines in PF post-breast cancer are well motivated.

Abstract P3-14-02: Racial/ethnic differences in the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients with an intermediate risk 21-gene recurrence score

Background: The Oncotype 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) is the most commonly ordered genomic biomarker used to inform decisions on adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. Representation of racial/ethnic minority patients in the population used to develop the assay was poor, with only 5% of study participants identified as Black. This raises concern about the accuracy of the RS in underrepresented populations. In earlier work (Hoskins et al, JAMA Oncology 2021), we showed that the RS has less prognostic accuracy in Black compared with non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. This finding is concerning in light of persistent racial disparities in breast cancer mortality. Here we examine the predictive accuracy of the RS according to race/ethnicity for identifying patients with ER+, axillary node-negative breast cancer who benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: We conducted a large, population-based retrospective cohort study of women 18+ years diagnosed with ER+, axillary node-negative breast cancer from 2004 to 2010 using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Oncotype DX Database (2004-2015). This analysis included women with a minimum of 7 yrs follow-up and an RS of 11-25, since this is the group with the most uncertainty regarding the benefit of chemotherapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from cancer registry data. Propensity score weighted Cox models determined the association between chemotherapy use and breast cancer death. Age, insurance status, tumor grade, tumor size, progesterone receptor status, and RS were included as predictors of the propensity score. Associations between chemotherapy use and breast cancer death were determined using overall, race/ethnicity, and age stratum-specific hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: The analysis included 22,693 NHW, 5,657 Black, and 3,348 Hispanic women. The overall result is consistent with the prospective TAILORx trial, showing greater benefit from chemotherapy in women under age 50. There is a greater reduction in the hazard of breast cancer death associated with chemotherapy use for Black (HR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.15, 0.66) and Hispanic (HR 0.07, 95% CI, 0.02, 0.31) compared with NHW women under age 50 (HR 0.43, 95% CI,0.32, 0.59). In models combining Black and NHW patients, an interaction term for race*chemotherapy was significant (p=0.022), indicating a differential association between chemotherapy use and breast cancer death according to race/ethnicity. Visual comparison of breast cancer mortality curves that plot 7-year breast cancer death rate as a function of the continuous RS, stratified by chemotherapy administration (yes/no), shows that the curves begin to diverge at a lower RS for Black (RS 17) compared with NHW women (RS 24). Conclusions: This observational study found that Black women under age 50 with ER+, axillary node-negative breast cancer and an RS of 11-25 derive significantly more benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy than NHW women. National practice guidelines do not recommend routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients in this risk category, indicating that many Black patients may be undertreated. Results need to be confirmed in prospective studies, but they suggest that RS cut-offs used to recommend adjuvant chemotherapy may need to be modified for racial/ethnic minority women.

Hazard of Breast Cancer Death (95% Confidence Interval)Race/EthnicityChemotherapyAll AgesAge &lt; 50Age 50+OverallYes0.71 (0.63, 0.81)0.32 (0.25, 0.41)1.01 (0.87, 1.18)NoRefRefRefNHWYes0.73 (0.62,0.84)0.43 (0.32, 0.59)0.87 (0.74, 1.04)NoRefRefRefBlackYes0.83 (0.60, 1.16)0.31 (0.15, 0.66)1.26 (0.84, 1.89)NoRefRefRefHispanicYes0.33 (0.20, 0.57)0.07 (0.02, 0.31)0.61 (0.33, 1.12)NoRefRefRef

Citation Format: Hsiao- Ching Huang, Gregory S. Calip, Jennifer Weiss, Yael Simons, V.K. Gadi, Oana C. Danciu, Garth H. Rauscher, Kent F. Hoskins. Racial/ethnic differences in the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients with an intermediate risk 21-gene recurrence score [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-14-02.

Abstract PO-097: Racial/ethnic disparities in the survival of HR+/HER2- early breast cancer using the CPS+EG scoring system

Background: The CPS+EG system, based on pretreatment clinical and post-treatment pathologic stage (CPS), estrogen receptor status (E), and tumor grade (G), has been used to refine estimations of prognosis in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, it is unclear if this tool effectively characterizes risk in all patient subgroups. Racial disparities exist in treatment and survival among women with early breast cancer, particularly among non-Hispanic Black women compared with non-Hispanic White women. Our objective was to describe racial disparities in the overall survival of women with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer across risk groups characterized by CPS+EG scores. Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database to perform a hospital-based, retrospective cohort study of breast cancer patients ages 18 years and older. Women diagnosed with first primary stages I-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer between 2010 and 2017 with complete clinical information to calculate a CPS+EG score were included. We grouped patients into four categories based on their CPS+EG score (0-1, 2, 3, and 4+). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and 95% CI for associations between the CPS+EG and overall survival. Results: A cohort of 758,424 women (mean [SD] age, 62.2 [12.5] years; median [interquartile range] follow-up of 50.7 [33.2-72.0] months) were included in the analysis. Our analysis included 614,210 (81.0%) non-Hispanic White, 67,794 (8.9%) non-Hispanic Black, 38,229 (5.0%) Hispanic, 26,956 (3.6%) Asian/Pacific Islander, and 11,235 (1.5%) women of other racial/ethnic groups. Within the total cohort, 412,734 (54.4%) patients had CPS+EG scores of 0-1, 216,726 (28.6%) had a score of 2, 91,656 (12.1%) had a score of 3, and 37,308 (4.92%) had a score of 4 or greater. A one-unit increase in CPS+EG score was associated with 1.45-times greater mortality risk (95% CI, 1.43-1.47; p&lt;0.001) in multivariate-adjusted models, which was consistent across racial/ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic Black women had a significantly increased hazard of death relative to non-Hispanic White women across all CPS+EG risk categories, with the greatest disparity observed among high (4 or greater) CPS+EG scores (adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI, 1.15-1.31). Conversely, Asian and Hispanic patients had a significantly lower hazard of death relative to non-Hispanic White patients across all groups; however, the difference attenuated as CPS+EG scores increased. Conclusions: In women with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer, the CPS+EG score is predictive of overall survival, regardless of race; however, a significant racial disparity between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women persists in survival across CPS+EG scores, particularly in those with advanced disease. The broader use of CPS+EG to characterize mortality risk among racial/ethnic minority patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer requires further investigation.

Citation Format: Kent A. Hanson, Kent F. Hoskins, Naomi Y. Ko, Gregory S. Calip. Racial/ethnic disparities in the survival of HR+/HER2- early breast cancer using the CPS+EG scoring system [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Conference: 14th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2021 Oct 6-8. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-097.

Health-related Quality of Life in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Analyses From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare Health Outcomes Survey

This study describes health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among older Medicare beneficiaries with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (eBC). Women aged ≥65 years diagnosed with stage I-III HR+ eBC between 1997 and 2014 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare Health Outcomes Survey Data Resource were included. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form Health Survey including physical/mental component summary (PCS/MCS) scores and subscales. Patient surveys  ≤ 24 months post-diagnosis were matched to non-cancer controls. Mean differences in HRQoL were compared using analysis of covariance. Among 1880 HR+ eBC patients versus 5640 matched non-cancer controls, eBC patients surveyed  ≤ 6 months post-diagnosis (n  =  530) scored lower on component scores (PCS mean difference  =  1.6 [95%CI: 0.6-2.6]; MCS mean difference  =  2.0 [95%CI: 1.0-3.0]) and multiple subscales. Among women surveyed 19 to 24 months post-diagnosis (n  =  402), mean differences in HRQoL were modest (PCS: 1.2 [95%CI: 0.1-2.4]; MCS: −1.5 [95%CI: −2.7 to −0.3]). Most differences in HRQoL following diagnosis of eBC did not indicate statistical significance or minimally important difference, emphasizing that preservation of HRQoL is an important and realistic goal among patients with eBC.

Trend in Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Utilization, Price, and Out-of-Pocket Costs in Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

PURPOSE

Treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved survival but is associated with significant financial burden. We measured the annual trend in TKI utilization, Medicare gross payment, and patient out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure from 2007 to 2016.

METHODS

We used SEER linked to Medicare part-D claims data to identify prevalent CML cases from 2007 to 2016. TKI utilization was measured as the proportion of cases with at least one TKI fill in each year. Average TKI gross payment and median per-member per-month OOP expenditure were calculated from claims data and plotted annually from 2007 to 2016. Year-to-year percent change in gross payment and OOP expenditure was compared with inflation indices.

RESULTS

The cohort included 3,189 CML cases with at least one TKI claim. The proportion of prevalent patients with a TKI fill in a year increased from 17.9% in 2007 to 52.8% in 2015. The average annual gross payment per 30-day supply of a TKI increased by an average of 12.8% throughout the period from $9,000 to $10,000 US dollars in 2016. There was no increasing trend in median OOP expenditure per 30-day supply, which varied between $450 and $600 US dollars.

CONCLUSION

Rising TKI use and TKI drug prices place considerable financial pressure on Medicare part-D insurers. Although there was no increasing trend in OOP expenditure, it may be burdensome for Medicare patients who are likely retired on a fixed income. Our findings support legislation that mitigates increasing drug prices to protect the Medicare system and its beneficiaries.

Associations between frailty and cancer-specific mortality among older women with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Frailty is assessed when making treatment decisions among older women with breast cancer (BC), which in turn impacts survival. We evaluated associations between pre-diagnosis frailty and risks of BC-specific and all-cause mortality in older women.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries ages ≥ 65 years with stage I-III BC using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare Health Outcome Survey Data Resource. Frailty was measured using the deficit-accumulation frailty index, categorized as robust, pre-frail, or frail, at baseline and during follow-up. Fine and Gray competing risk and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR) and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for BC-specific and all-cause mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 2411 women with a median age of 75 years at BC diagnosis, 49.5% were categorized as robust, 29.4% were pre-frail and 21.1% were frail. Fewer frail women compared to robust women received breast-conserving surgery (52.8% vs. 61.5%, frail vs. robust, respectively) and radiation (43.5% vs. 51.8%). In multivariable analyses, degree of frailty was not associated with BC-specific mortality (frail vs robust SHR 1.47, 95% CI 0.97-2.24). However, frail women with BC had higher risks of all-cause mortality compared to robust women with BC (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.84-2.92).

CONCLUSION

Among a cohort of older women with BC, higher degrees of frailty were associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality, but not BC-specific mortality. Future study should examine if preventing progression of frailty may improve all-cause mortality.

Population-based recurrence rates among older women with HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: Clinical risk factors, frailty status, and differences by race

BACKGROUND

Multiple independent risk factors are associated with the prognosis of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC), the most common BC subtype. This study describes U.S. population-based recurrence rates among older, resected women with HR+/HER2- early BC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of older women diagnosed with incident, invasive stages I-III HR+/HER2- BC who underwent surgery to remove the primary tumor using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Linked Database (2007-2015). SEER records and administrative health claims data were used to ascertain patient and tumor-specific characteristics, treatment, and frailty status. Cumulative incidences of BC recurrence were estimated using a validated algorithm for administrative claims data. Multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk models estimated adjusted subdistribution hazards ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for associations with BC recurrence risk.

RESULTS

Overall, 46,027 women age ≥65 years were included in our analysis. Over a median follow up of 7 years, 6531 women experienced BC recurrence with an estimated 3 and 5-year cumulative incidence rates of 10 % and 16 %, respectively. Higher 3- and 5-year cumulative incidences were observed in women with larger tumor size (5+ cm, 21 % and 28 %), lymph node involvement (4+ nodes, 27 % and 37 %), and with frail health status at diagnosis (13 % and 20 %). Independent of these clinical risk factors, Black, Hispanic and American Indian/Alaskan Native women had significantly increased BC recurrence risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of recurrence in HR+/HER2- early BC differs by several patient and clinical factors, including high-risk tumor characteristics. Racial differences in BC outcomes deserve continued attention from clinicians and policymakers.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on treatment patterns for US patients with metastatic solid cancer

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to delays in patients seeking care for life-threatening conditions; however, its impact on treatment patterns for patients with metastatic cancer is unknown. We assessed the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on time to treatment initiation (TTI) and treatment selection for patients newly diagnosed with metastatic solid cancer.

METHODS

We used an electronic health record-derived longitudinal database curated via technology-enabled abstraction to identify 14,136 US patients newly diagnosed with de novo or recurrent metastatic solid cancer between January 1 and July 31 in 2019 or 2020. Patients received care at ∼280 predominantly community-based oncology practices. Controlled interrupted time series analyses assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic period (April-July 2020) on TTI, defined as the number of days from metastatic diagnosis to receipt of first-line systemic therapy, and use of myelosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

The adjusted probability of treatment within 30 days of diagnosis [95% confidence interval] was similar across periods: January-March 2019 41.7% [32.2%, 51.1%]; April-July 2019 42.6% [32.4%, 52.7%]; January-March 2020 44.5% [30.4%, 58.6%]; April-July 2020 46.8% [34.6%, 59.0%]; adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences 1.4% [-2.7%, 5.5%]. Among 5,962 patients who received first-line systemic therapy, there was no association between the pandemic period and use of myelosuppressive therapy (adjusted percentage-point difference-in-differences 1.6% [-2.6%, 5.8%]). There was no meaningful effect modification by cancer type, race, or age.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite known pandemic-related delays in surveillance and diagnosis, the COVID-19 pandemic did not impact time to treatment initiation or treatment selection for patients with metastatic solid cancers.

Risk of fall-related injury and all-cause hospitalization of select concomitant central nervous system medication prescribing in older adult persistent opioid users: A case-time-control analysis

BACKGROUND

Concomitant use of central nervous system (CNS) medications frequently occurs in older adults with persistent opioid use. The risks of adverse outcomes associated with combinations of opioids, sedative hypnotics, or skeletal muscle relaxants have not been sufficiently described in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the overall and incremental risk of (1) fall-related injury and (2) all-cause hospitalization associated with sedative hypnotics and skeletal muscle relaxants among older persistent opioid users.

METHODS

A case-time-control study was conducted using administrative claims of adults ages ≥66 years with a history of persistent (≥90 days) opioid use. Cases included those with first (1) emergency department, hospital, or outpatient visit for a fall-related injury, or (2) all-cause hospitalization. Exposure to CNS medications prior to the case event versus earlier periods, and the risk associated with CNS drug class combinations and sequence of use, was estimated using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for time trends and time-varying covariates.

RESULTS

Among 140,101 older persistent opioid users, 20,723 experienced fall-related injury and 39,444 were hospitalized during follow-up. Skeletal muscle relaxant use was associated with an increased risk of fall-related injury (Odds ratio [OR] 1.28) and all-cause hospitalization (OR 1.11). Statistically significant associations were observed for the joint effects of interactions involving skeletal muscle relaxants on fall-related injury (with opioid: OR 1.25; with sedative hypnotic: OR 1.24), and interactions involving opioids on all-cause hospitalization (with sedative hypnotic: OR 1.10; with skeletal muscle relaxant: OR 1.17). The addition of a skeletal muscle relaxant to an opioid regimen was associated with a 25% increased risk of fall-related injury. Additions of other CNS medications did not have apparent incremental effects on the risk of all-cause hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

The excess risks of fall-related injury and hospitalization associated with various combinations of CNS medications among older persistent opioid users should be considered in therapeutic decision making. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.