Tocilizumab as a potential therapeutic option for children with severe, refractory juvenile localized scleroderma

Non-invasive imaging and clinical skin scores in juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether in juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS), non-invasive imaging can differentiate affected from non-affected skin and whether imaging correlates with a validated skin score [Localised Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT)].

METHODS

A total of 25 children with JLS were recruited into a prospective study and a single 'target' lesion was selected. High-frequency ultrasound (HFUS, measuring skin thickness), infrared thermography (IRT, skin temperature), laser Doppler imaging (LDI, skin blood flow) and multispectral imaging (MSI, oxygenation) were performed at four sites: two of affected skin (centre and inner edge of lesion) and two of non-affected skin (1 cm from the edge of the lesion 'outer' and contralateral non-affected side) at four visits at 3 month intervals.

RESULTS

Differences between affected and non-affected skin were detected with all four techniques. Compared with non-affected skin, affected skin was thinner (P < 0.001), with higher temperature (P < 0.001-0.006), perfusion (P < 0.001-0.039) and oxygenation (P < 0.001-0.028). Lesion skin activity (LoSCAT) was positively correlated with centre HFUS [r = 0.32 (95% CI 0.02, 0.61), P = 0.036] and negatively correlated with centre LDI [r = -0.26 (95% CI -0.49, -0.04), P = 0.022]. Lesion skin damage was positively correlated with centre and inner IRT [r = 0.43 (95% CI 0.19, 0.67), P < 0.001 and r = 0.36 (95% CI 0.12, 0.59), P = 0.003, respectively] and with centre and inner LDI [r = 0.37 (95% CI 0.05, 0.69), P = 0.024 and r = 0.41 (95% CI 0.08, 0.74), P = 0.015, respectively].

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive imaging can detect differences between affected and non-affected skin in JLS and may help to differentiate between activity (thicker, less well-perfused skin) and damage (thinner, highly perfused skin).

S2k guideline: Diagnosis and therapy of localized scleroderma

The updated S2k guideline deals with the diagnosis and therapy of localized scleroderma (LoS). LoS represents a spectrum of sclerotic skin diseases in which, depending on the subtype and localisation, structures such as adipose tissue, muscles, joints, and bones may also be affected. Involvement of internal organs or progression to systemic sclerosis does not occur. LoS can be classified into four main forms: limited, generalized, linear, and mixed forms, with some additional subtypes. For cases of limited skin involvement, the guideline primarily recommends therapy with topical corticosteroids. UV therapy can also be recommended. In subtypes with severe skin or musculoskeletal involvement, systemic therapy with methotrexate is recommended. During the active phase of the disease, systemic glucocorticosteroids can be used additionally. In cases of methotrexate and steroid refractory courses, contraindications, or intolerance, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid, or abatacept can be considered as second-line systemic therapies. In the case of linear LoS, autologous adipose-derived stem cell transplantation can also be performed for correcting soft tissue defects.

S2k‐Leitlinie: Diagnostik und Therapie der zirkumskripten Sklerodermie

Die vorliegende aktualisierte S2k‐Leitlinie befasst sich mit der Diagnostik und der Therapie der zirkumskripten Sklerodermie (ZS). Diese umfasst ein Spektrum sklerotischer Erkrankungen der Haut mit, je nach Subtyp und Lokalisation, möglicher Beteiligung von hautnahen Strukturen wie Fettgewebe, Muskulatur, Gelenke und Knochen. Ein Befall innerer Organe oder ein Übergang in eine systemische Sklerodermie treten nicht auf. Eingeteilt werden kann die ZS in die vier Hauptformen der limitierten, generalisierten, linearen und gemischten Form. Teilweise existieren weitere Unterformen. Bei limitiertem Hautbefall empfiehlt die Leitlinie primär eine Therapie mit topischen Kortikosteroiden. Eine UV‐Therapie kann ebenfalls sinnvoll sein. Bei Subtypen mit schwerem Hautbefall oder muskuloskelettalem Befall wird eine systemische Therapie mit Methotrexat empfohlen. In der aktiven Phase der Erkrankung können ergänzend systemische Glukokortikosteroide eingesetzt werden. Bei MTX‐ und Steroid‐refraktären Verläufen, Kontraindikation oder Unverträglichkeit sollten Mycophenolat‐Mofetil, Mycophenolsäure oder Abatacept als Systemtherapie der zweiten Wahl eingesetzt werden. Bei einer linearen ZS kann zudem eine autologe Fettstammzelltransplantation zur Korrektur von Weichteildefekten erfolgen.

Consensus statement on the diagnosis and treatment of sclerosing diseases of the skin, Part 1: Localized scleroderma, systemic sclerosis and overlap syndromes

The term 'sclerosing diseases of the skin' comprises specific dermatological entities, which have fibrotic changes of the skin in common. These diseases mostly manifest in different clinical subtypes according to cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement and can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from each other. The present consensus provides an update to the 2017 European Dermatology Forum Guidelines, focusing on characteristic clinical and histopathological features, diagnostic scores and the serum autoantibodies most useful for differential diagnosis. In addition, updated strategies for the first- and advanced-line therapy of sclerosing skin diseases are addressed in detail. Part 1 of this consensus provides clinicians with an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of localized scleroderma (morphea), and systemic sclerosis including overlap syndromes.

Recent Advances in Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis and Morphea

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and morphea are autoimmune sclerosing diseases that cause significant morbidity, and in the case of SSc, mortality. The pathogenesis of both SSc and morphea share vascular dysfunction, auto-reactive T cells and Th2-associated cytokines, such as interleukin 4, and overproduction of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ). TGFβ stimulates fibroblast collagen and extra-cellular matrix production. Although morphea and SSc have similar pathogenic pathways and histological findings, they are distinct diseases. Recent advances in treatment of morphea, skin sclerosis in SSc, and interstitial lung disease in SSc are focused on targeting known pathogenic pathways.

Connective tissue nevus misdiagnosed as juvenile localized scleroderma

BACKGROUND

Connective tissue nevi (CTN) are congenital hamartomas caused by excessive proliferation of dermis components. In children, CTN can mimic juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS), an immune mediated skin disorder that requires aggressive immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVES

Aim of our study was to describe a series of pediatric patients with CTN misdiagnosed as JLS and the discerning characteristics between the two conditions.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of children referred to our Center during the last two decades for JLS who received a final diagnosis of CTN. Clinical, laboratory, histopathological and instrumental data (MRI and thermography) were collected and compared with those with JLS.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with mean age at onset 4.6 years entered the study. All came to our Center with a certain diagnosis of JLS (n = 15) or suspected JLS (n = 2). The indurated skin lesions were flat and resembled either circumscribed morphea or pansclerotic morphea. In 14 patients (82.4%) they were mainly localized at the lower limbs and in three (17.6%) at the upper limbs. No patient had laboratory inflammatory changes or positive autoantibodies. Skin biopsies confirmed the diagnosis of CTN: non-familial collagenoma in eleven (64.7%), mixed CTN in four (23.5%) and familial CTN in two (11.8%). Mean age at final diagnosis was 9.5 years, with a mean diagnostic delay of 4.8 years (range 1-15 years). Sixteen patients underwent musculoskeletal MRI that was normal in all except two who showed muscle perifascial enhancement. Thermography was normal in all patients. At our first evaluation, eleven patients (64.7%) were on systemic treatment (methotrexate 11, corticosteroids 7, biologics 2), three (17.6%) on topical corticosteroids and three untreated.

CONCLUSIONS

CTN can be misdiagnosed as JLS and therefore aggressively treated with prolonged and inappropriate immunosuppression. The absence of inflammatory appearance of the skin lesions, normal instrumental and laboratory findings and the accurate evaluation of skin biopsy are crucial to address the right diagnosis.

Systemic therapy in juvenile localized scleroderma

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare sclerosing disorder of childhood which can result in permanent morbidity and functional disability, if not effectively treated. Treatment should be started in the inflammatory phase before the development of any complication and/or damage.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we will discuss how to assess disease activity and damage in JLS, and propose an escalation plan for systemic treatment, according to a treat-to-target concept. We will discuss the definition of inactive disease and how and when to discontinue medications.

EXPERT OPINION

Before starting treatment, it is extremely important to assess baseline disease activity for treatment response to be adequately checked. Moreover, the activity of the extra cutaneous involvement is an important part of the assessment. Patients should be treated in the 'therapeutic window,' before significant fibrosis results. Most patients should receive systemic treatments; in these patients, Methotrexate should be used as the first-line disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). However, methotrexate intolerance or non-response is an issue, and these patients should be proposed a treatment escalation according to results of latest studies. Future research can develop better prognostic markers to help to guide our decision.

Morphea: The 2023 update

Morphea, also known as localized scleroderma, is a chronic inflammatory connective tissue disorder with variable clinical presentations, that affects both adults and children. It is characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the skin and underlying soft tissue, in certain cases even of the surrounding structures such as fascia, muscle, bone and central nervous system. While the etiology is still unknown, many factors may contribute to disease development, including genetic predisposition, vascular dysregulation, T_H1/T_H2 imbalance with chemokines and cytokines associated with interferon-γ and profibrotic pathways as well as certain environmental factors. Since the disease may progress to permanent cosmetic and functional sequelae, it is crucial to properly assess the disease activity and to initiate promptly the adequate treatment, thus preventing subsequent damage. The mainstay of treatment is based on corticosteroids and methotrexate. These, however, are limited by their toxicity, especially if applied long-term. Furthermore, corticosteroids and methotrexate often do not sufficiently control the disease and/or the frequent relapses of morphea. This review presents the current understanding of morphea by discussing its epidemiology, diagnosis, management and prognosis. In addition, it will describe recent pathogenetic findings, thus proposing potential novel targets for therapeutic development in morphea.

Treatment of juvenile localized scleroderma: current recommendations, response factors, and potential alternative treatments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is a chronic autoimmune and fibrosing disease associated with a high risk for functional impairment. Antifibrotic options are limited, so current treatment strategies are focused on disease activity control. Pediatric rheumatologists are in consensus on the need to treat with systemic immunosuppressants, in particular, methotrexate. However, more than 30% of patients fail initial methotrexate treatment. This review provides an update on current management and reviews reports on potential alternative treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

An overview of current treatment recommendations and its efficacy are discussed. Recent studies have identified several factors associated with likelihood of treatment response. These include time to initiation of treatment, certain subtypes, and extracutaneous involvement. Findings from recent reports of alternative systemic immunomodulators, including biologic medications, will be summarized.

SUMMARY

Methotrexate treatment has greatly improved outcome for most jLS patients but a substantial portion have refractory cutaneous and/or extracutaneous disease. Treatment response factors are being identified, which could lead to improved management strategies. Recent studies provide further support on mycophenolate mofetil as an alternative treatment. Data on biologic therapies is encouraging, with data suggesting efficacy for many extracutaneous manifestations but more studies are needed to evaluate these and other options for jLS.

Immune-Related Uncommon Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of oncology, and has become standard of care in multiple cancer types in front or late lines of therapy, with some longstanding responses and outstanding results. Notwithstanding, its use has brought a totally unique spectrum of adverse events, characterized by a myriad of diverse manifestations affecting nearly every organ and system of the body, including the endocrine, nervous, cardiac, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. Uncommon adverse events, defined as those occurring in less than 1% of patients, comprise an even more heterogeneous group of diseases that are being seen more recurrently as the use of immune check-point inhibitors increases and indications spread in different tumor types and stages. Here, we comprehensively review some uncommon, but exceedingly important, immune-related adverse events, with special emphasis in the clinical approach and diagnostic workup, aiming to reunite the evidence published previously, allowing an increase in awareness and knowledge from all specialists implicated in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Pediatric morphea state-of-the-art literature review: Reframing morphea as a systemic disease

Pediatric morphea is an inflammatory, fibrosing dermatologic disorder. Although morphea may be localized to the skin and subcutaneous tissues, differentiating it from systemic sclerosis, there is increasing evidence that morphea is a manifestation of a systemic inflammatory process, with the potential to involve many organ systems. Given the potential risk for irreversible sequelae, pediatric morphea should be treated early and aggressively. Long-term disease monitoring is essential.

Preliminary evidence on abatacept safety and efficacy in refractory juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept treatment for refractory juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) in a retrospective study.

METHODS

A multicentre cohort study was performed to evaluate jLS subjects treated with abatacept with follow-up for 12 months to maximum of 24 months. Assessments at 6-month intervals included skin activity measures and physician global assessment of activity (PGA-A). Descriptive statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen subjects were studied with median age of 13.4 years, the majority had linear scleroderma subtype, and musculoskeletal involvement. All had previously failed MTX and/or mycophenolate mofetil treatment and glucocorticoids. Abatacept was added to the subject's maintenance DMARD treatment; 13 also received glucocorticoids at start of abatacept. No serious adverse events occurred. Skin activity and PGA-A scores declined in nearly all by 6 months and continued to improve from 6 to 12 months. At 12 months, 15 (83%) subjects were considered responders, two (11%) treatment failures, and one dropped out for adverse event. Response was sustained for 11 (61%) subjects to 18 months and eight (44%) to 24 months. Overall, four (22%) subjects were treatment failures and three (16.7%) discontinued abatacept for adverse event. Active musculoskeletal problems improved in most affected subjects. Ten subjects were able to discontinue initial glucocorticoid and six concomitant DMARD treatment.

CONCLUSION

Abatacept was found to be safe and effective for jLS subjects refractory to standard of care treatment. Subjects experienced improvement in both skin and musculoskeletal activity. Prospective studies should be performed to more fully evaluate abatacept's efficacy.

Mycophenolate mofetil for methotrexate-resistant juvenile localized scleroderma

OBJECTIVES

To investigate safety and efficacy of MMF in patients with severe or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma.

METHODS

Consecutive juvenile localized scleroderma patients undergoing systemic treatment were included in a retrospective longitudinal study. Patients treated with MMF because they were refractory or intolerant to MTX (MMF-group) were compared with responders to MTX (MTX-group). Disease activity was assessed by Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool and thermography. Disease course was established on the number of relapses and treatment changes. Relapse-free survival was examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

MMF and MTX groups included 22 and 47 patients, respectively. No significant difference in demographics, follow-up duration and treatment before diagnosis was observed between groups. The most represented clinical subtypes in the MMF-group were pansclerotic morphea and mixed subtype (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029, respectively), and linear scleroderma of the face in the MTX-group (P = 0.048). MMF was started because of MTX resistance (18 patients), relapse during MTX tapering/withdrawal (3 patients) and anaphylaxis to MTX (1 patient). After mean 9.4 years of follow-up, 90.9% of patients on MMF and 100% of those on MTX had inactive disease. No significant difference in relapse-free survival between the groups was found (P = 0.066, log-rank test), although MMF likely induced more persistent remission. MMF was well tolerated and combination of MMF and MTX did not increase its efficacy.

CONCLUSION

The present study adds strong evidence on the efficacy and tolerance of MMF in severe and/or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma. Further controlled studies are needed to prove its efficacy as first line treatment.

Does tocilizumab have a role in dermatology? A review of clinical applications, its adverse side effects and practical considerations

Tocilizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to the interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor which was first approved for use in refractory rheumatoid arthritis almost a decade ago. Since then, its use has expanded to a number of rheumatological and inflammatory conditions. In dermatology, off-label use of tocilizumab has been reported to be efficacious in morphoea, systemic sclerosis, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, graft-versus-host disease, pyoderma gangrenosum, Behcet's disease, Schnitzler's syndrome, sarcoidosis, and cutaneous adverse reactions. That being said, the evidence demonstrating tocilizumab's efficacy in dermatology is predominantly low-level case-based evidence, and one must consider the potential for publication bias. In this review we will discuss the reported clinical applications of tocilizumab in dermatology, mechanisms of action, and the range of associated adverse effects (both cutaneous and non-cutaneous) that can occur. Additionally, we will discuss the role of tocilizumab in the management of COVID-19.

Frontal Linear Scleroderma (en coup de sabre): A Case Report

En coup de sabre is an unusual variant of localized scleroderma characterized by its distinct location involving the frontoparietal region of the forehead and scalp. The authors describe a rare case of en coup de sabre in a 3-year-old boy whose disease onset was at 12 months of age. This article presents the clinical manifestations of continuous changes in the lesion photographed over time. The clinical presentation, laboratory results, and radiological findings together with a brief discussion of the management of the disease are discussed.

Tocilizumab and its usage for skin diseases

The monoclonal anti-IL6 receptor antibody called Tocilizumab is widely used by rheumatologists for joint diseases. Its application in dermatology has mainly concerned scleroderma and Systemic Sclerosis in the last years. The most varied skin diseases treated with tocilizumab, such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Behcet's Syndrome, Lupus, and the already mentioned scleroderma up to multi-organ syndromes with skin involvement will be discussed. At the same time, there have been several side reactions to the drug involving the skin forcing careful skin monitoring during treatment. Despite the evidence currently available in the appropriate literature, there is no formal recommendation for any of these diseases to use Tocilizumab for therapeutic purposes. The aim of this review was to collect all the main evidence on the use and involvement of the drug in dermatological practice in order to stimulate further research or hypothesize on possible therapeutic options.

Tocilizumab therapy in juvenile systemic sclerosis: a retrospective single centre pilot study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) as a treatment option of juvenile systemic sclerosis (JSS). Nine JSS patients were assigned to a TCZ, additionally to conventional treatment (steroids, methotrexate, mycophenolate-mofetil). The modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS), carbon-monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO), thorax high-resolution tomography (HRCT), patient global assessment (PGA) and Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis Severity (J4S) score were used to explore the efficacy of treatment. Nine JSS patients were treated with TCZ with a median treatment duration of 10 (1-21) months. Nine patients (77.8%) had radiologically confirmed improvement on thorax HRCT, 7 (77.8%) had decreased PGA (mean pre-treatment PGA 3.7 vs. 2.3 post-treatment PGA 2), 6 (66.7%) had increased DLCO (mean pre-treatment DLCO 69.14% vs. post-treatment DLCO 79.50%) after the TCZ treatment. In all patients mRSS and the J4S decreased: 26.1 vs. 19.7 and 8.2 vs. 4.7, respectively. Changes in mRSS, DLCO, PGA and J4S were statistically significant: p = 0.012, 0.04, 0.026 and 0.007, respectively. All patients tolerated well TCZ treatment. JSS is a rare condition characterized with skin fibrosis and internal organ involvement. Tocilizumab represents a potential treatment option for patients unresponsive to conventional treatment. Long-term prospective studies with higher number of patients are needed to provide more relevant data.

Treatment in Juvenile Scleroderma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of scleroderma in children is challenging since little is known about its pathogenesis. Herein, we review the most recent evidence regarding the treatment of juvenile scleroderma.

RECENT FINDINGS

According to the recent recommendations for Pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE), systemic treatment in localized scleroderma is needed when there is a risk for disability, such as in generalized or pansclerotic morphea and progressive linear scleroderma. In juvenile systemic sclerosis, the introduction of the severity score, J4S, has standardized the assessment of the patients in the daily practice and allowed a more tailored therapeutic approach. Since, to date, no clinical trial is available in JSSc, due to its rarity, the treatment is based on adults' experience. The recent recommendations for juvenile scleroderma represent an important instrument to standardize the treatment approach, confirm the role of methotrexate, and open new windows for effective experimental treatments, such as mycophenolate mofetil and biological agents, for severe or refractory cases.

Overview of Juvenile localized scleroderma and its management

BACKGROUND

Juvenile localized scleroderma (JLS) is a rare pediatric disease characterized by inflammation and skin thickening. JLS is associated with deep tissue and extracutaneous involvement that often results in functional impairment and growth disturbances. This article provides an overview of the disease with a focus on active features and treatment.

DATA SOURCES

We searched databases including PubMed, Elsevier and MedLine and Wanfang, reviewing publications from 2013 to 2019. Selected earlier publications were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Linear scleroderma is the most common JLS subtype. Several lines of evidence suggest that JLS is an autoimmune disease. Extracutaneous involvement is common and can present before the onset of skin disease. Multiple skin features are associated with disease activity, and activity can also manifest as arthritis, myositis, uveitis, seizures, and growth impairment. Systemic immunosuppressive treatment, commonly methotrexate with or without glucocorticoids, greatly improves outcome and is recommended for treating JLS patients with active disease and moderate or higher severity. Long term monitoring is needed because of the disease's chronicity and the high frequency of relapses off of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

JLS is associated with a risk for disabling and disfiguring morbidity for the growing child. Identifying active disease is important for guiding treatment, but often difficult because of the paucity of markers and lack of a universal skin activity feature. More studies of JLS pathophysiology are needed to allow the identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Comparative effectiveness treatment studies are also needed to work towards optimizing care and outcome.

Is biological therapy in systemic sclerosis the answer?

Systemic sclerosis is a systemic fibrosing disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with no universally accepted disease-modifying therapy. Significant advances in the understanding of systemic sclerosis in recent years have guided the exploration of biological drugs in systemic sclerosis. In this narrative review, we summarize the published literature on biologic therapies in systemic sclerosis. A double-blind randomized trial, and an open label trial of tocilizumab (which antagonizes the interleukin 6 receptor), identified potential benefits in skin and lung fibrosis in systemic sclerosis; however, these differences failed to attain statistical significance. Two open-label trials compared rituximab (which depletes B lymphocytes) to conventional treatment/ cyclophosphamide in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD), and revealed significant improvements in lung functions and skin disease with rituximab. Significant observational data also support the use of rituximab in skin, lung, muscle and joint manifestations of systemic sclerosis. Abatacept (which blocks T lymphocyte activation) has demonstrated utility for skin and joint disease in systemic sclerosis; a recent clinical trial failed to demonstrate benefits in improving skin thickness compared to placebo. Agents targeting type I interferons, interleukin 17 pathway, CD19 and plasma cells hold promise in systemic sclerosis; however, high-quality evidence is lacking. The results of different ongoing clinical trials targeting B lymphocytes, T lymphocytes, various cytokines (interleukins 6, 17, 4, 13, IL-1α), platelet-derived growth factor receptor, proteasome, integrins or oncostatin M may help guide future therapeutic regimens with biological agents in systemic sclerosis.

Update on the Systemic Treatment of Pediatric Localized Scleroderma

Juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) is an orphan disease that can lead to cosmetic disfiguration and orthopedic problems. Two recent publications review the current recommendations regarding diagnosis, assessment, follow up and treatment of pediatric localized scleroderma cases, both of which suggest the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool as an important instrument to assess activity and damage. This review focuses on the systemic treatment of jLS. Systemic treatment includes synthetic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Systemic therapy is indicated if the lesion crosses any joint, or leads to potential cosmetic disfiguration or orthopedic problems. The only controlled trial of systemic treatment has shown the efficacy of methotrexate, which is the first choice of treatment. It appears superior to phototherapy according to a recently published meta-analysis. In case of methotrexate intolerance, mycophenolate mofetil is an option. In case of methotrexate nonresponse, addition of mycophenolate mofetil, tocilizumab or abatacept seems to be effective. Future treatment options derived and extrapolated from adult trials regarding treatment of skin involvement of systemic scleroderma or fibrosis are promising, as the final pathway in the skin seems to be similar in both diseases.

Diagnosis and management of linear scleroderma in children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Linear scleroderma is the most common subtype of localized scleroderma (LoS) in children. It can be associated with extracutaneous manifestations and long-term sequelae. Thus, appropriate diagnosis and management are key to improve the prognosis. In this review, we summarize the most relevant recent publications for the diagnosis, evaluation of disease activity and adequate management of patients with linear scleroderma.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are specific clinical features that indicate activity in LoS; dermoscopy and Wood's lamp may be useful. Summarizing, scoring methods seem to provide the most adequate assessment of LoS; but several biomarkers that correlate with activity have been studied: E-selectin and IL-2 receptor, CD34+ dermal dendritic cells and Th/Th1 immunophenotype with decreased T helper (Th2), T regulatory (Tregs), B and natural killer (NK) cells. Recent studies propose hydroxychloroquine monotherapy and tocilizumab as potential therapeutic options.

SUMMARY

Clinical evaluation, both physical exam and history, is the most important aspect in diagnosing and assessing activity of linear scleroderma. Clinical scoring methods may be most useful for evaluation of activity; eventually, other biomarkers could be relevant in clinical practice. For most patients with linear scleroderma, the first choice of treatment is methotrexate, but physical therapy, plastic surgery and/or orthopedic management are key to improve residual limitations and quality of life. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/MOP/A35.

Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile localised scleroderma

In 2012, a European initiative called Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) was launched to optimise and disseminate diagnostic and management regimens in Europe for children and young adults with rheumatic diseases. Juvenile localised scleroderma (JLS) is a rare disease within the group of paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRD) and can lead to significant morbidity. Evidence-based guidelines are sparse and management is mostly based on physicians' experience. This study aims to provide recommendations for assessment and treatment of JLS. Recommendations were developed by an evidence-informed consensus process using the European League Against Rheumatism standard operating procedures. A committee was formed, mainly from Europe, and consisted of 15 experienced paediatric rheumatologists and two young fellows. Recommendations derived from a validated systematic literature review were evaluated by an online survey and subsequently discussed at two consensus meetings using a nominal group technique. Recommendations were accepted if ≥80% agreement was reached. In total, 1 overarching principle, 10 recommendations on assessment and 6 recommendations on therapy were accepted with ≥80% agreement among experts. Topics covered include assessment of skin and extracutaneous involvement and suggested treatment pathways. The SHARE initiative aims to identify best practices for treatment of patients suffering from PRDs. Within this remit, recommendations for the assessment and treatment of JLS have been formulated by an evidence-informed consensus process to produce a standard of care for patients with JLS throughout Europe.

Multi-centre national audit of juvenile localised scleroderma: describing current UK practice in disease assessment and management

OBJECTIVE

To describe current United Kingdom practice in assessment and management of patients with juvenile localised scleroderma (JLS) compared to Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES) scleroderma working party recommendations.

METHODS

Patients were included if they were diagnosed with JLS and were under the care of paediatric rheumatology between 04/2015-04/2016. Retrospective data was collected in eleven UK centres using a standardised proforma and collated centrally.

RESULTS

149 patients were included with a median age of 12.5 years. The outcome measures recommended by the PRES scleroderma working party were not utilised widely. The localised scleroderma cutaneous assessment tool was only used in 37.6% of patients. Screening for extracutaneous manifestations did not meet recommendations that patients with head involvement have regular screening for uveitis and baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain: only 38.5% of these patients were ever screened for uveitis; 71.2% had a MRI brain. Systemic treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologics was widely used (96.0%). In keeping with the recommendations, 95.5% of patients were treated with methotrexate as first-line therapy. 82.6% received systemic corticosteroids and 34.2% of patients required two or more DMARDs/biologics, highlighting the significant treatment burden. Second-line treatment was mycophenolate mofetil in 89.5%.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variation in assessment and screening of patients with JLS but a consistent approach to systemic treatment within UK paediatric rheumatology. Improved awareness of PRES recommendations is required to ensure standardised care. As recommendations are based on low level evidence and consensus opinion, further studies are needed to better define outcome measures and treatment regimens for JLS.

Off-label use of tocilizumab to treat non-juvenile idiopathic arthritis in pediatric rheumatic patients: a literature review

Tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 (IL-6) agent, is indicated as a treatment for several autoimmune or inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). IL-6 plays roles in both immune system dysregulation and inflammation, and thus efforts to extend the utility of tocilizumab in patients with autoinflammatory conditions are ongoing. Here, we survey the literature on the off-label use of tocilizumab in patients with juvenile-onset rheumatic diseases including juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), juvenile dermatomyositis (DM), vasculitis, juvenile scleroderma, and other autoinflammatory diseases. There is no real evidence that tocilizumab is useful for patients with SLE and juvenile DM, but several cases of childhood Takayasu arteritis have experienced promising outcomes. In juvenile-onset scleroderma, for which no therapy that can halt disease progression is available, tocilizumab may stop progression and the associated functional impairment. Tocilizumab prevents systemic inflammation in patients with Kawasaki's disease, but may develop coronary aneurysms. Tocilizumab has been used to treat several pediatric autoinflammatory diseases, including JIA-associated uveitis and Castleman's disease. Further work in larger populations is necessary to confirm the effects of tocilizumab in patients with pediatric rheumatic diseases.