Bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells infusion in therapy refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients

Fostering tissue engineering and regenerative medicine to treat musculoskeletal disorders in bone and muscle

The musculoskeletal system, which is vital for movement, support, and protection, can be impaired by disorders such as osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and muscular dystrophy. This review focuses on the advances in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, specifically aimed at alleviating these disorders. It explores the roles of cell therapy, particularly Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells (ADSCs), biomaterials, and biomolecules/external stimulations in fostering bone and muscle regeneration. The current research underscores the potential of MSCs and ADSCs despite the persistent challenges of cell scarcity, inconsistent outcomes, and safety concerns. Moreover, integrating exogenous materials such as scaffolds and external stimuli like electrical stimulation and growth factors shows promise in enhancing musculoskeletal regeneration. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive studies and adopting innovative techniques together to refine and advance these multi-therapeutic strategies, ultimately benefiting patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Diseases

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) modulate immune responses and maintain self-tolerance. Their trophic activities and regenerative properties make them potential immunosuppressants for treating autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. MSCs are drawn to sites of injury and inflammation where they can both reduce inflammation and contribute to tissue regeneration. An increased understanding of the role of MSCs in the development and progression of autoimmune disorders has revealed that MSCs are passive targets in the inflammatory process, becoming impaired by it and exhibiting loss of immunomodulatory activity. MSCs have been considered as potential novel cell therapies for severe autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases, which at present have only disease modifying rather than curative treatment options. MSCs are emerging as potential therapies for severe autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. Clinical application of MSCs in rare cases of severe disease in which other existing treatment modalities have failed, have demonstrated potential use in treating multiple diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, myocardial infarction, liver cirrhosis, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and COVID-19 pneumonia. This review explores the biological mechanisms behind the role of MSCs in autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases. It also covers their immunomodulatory capabilities, potential therapeutic applications, and the challenges and risks associated with MSC therapy.

Synovial fluid mesenchymal progenitor cells from patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis demonstrate limited self-renewal and chondrogenesis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a heterogeneous group of inflammatory diseases affecting joints with a prevalence of one in a thousand children. There is a growing body of literature examining the use of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (MPCs) for the treatment of adult and childhood arthritis, however, we still lack a clear understanding of how these MPC populations are impacted by arthritic disease states and how this could influence treatment efficacy. In the current study we examined the immunophenotyping, self-renewal ability and chondrogenic capacity (in vitro and in vivo) of synovial derived MPCs from normal, JIA and RA joints. Synovial MPCs from JIA patients demonstrated reduced self-renewal ability and chondrogenic differentiation capacity. Furthermore, they did not induce cartilage regeneration when xenotransplanted in a mouse cartilage injury model. Synovial MPCs from JIA patients are functionally compromised compared to MPCs from normal and/or RA joints. The molecular mechanisms behind this loss of function remain elusive. Further study is required to see if these cells can be re-functionalized and used in cell therapy strategies for these JIA patients, or if allogenic approaches should be considered.

Allogeneic vs. autologous mesenchymal stem/stromal cells in their medication practice

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC)-based therapeutics is already available for treatment of a range of diseases or medical conditions. Autologous or allogeneic MSCs obtained from self or donors have their own advantages and disadvantages in their medical practice. Therapeutic benefits of using autologous vs. allogeneic MSCs are inconclusive. Transplanted MSCs within the body interact with their physical microenvironment or niche, physiologically or pathologically, and such cells in a newly established tissue microenvironment may be impacted by the pathological harmful environmental factors to alter their unique biological behaviors. Meanwhile, a temporary microenvironment/niche may be also altered by the resident or niche-surrounding MSCs. Therefore, the functional plasticity and heterogeneity of MSCs caused by different donors and subpopulations of MSCs may result in potential uncertainty in their safe and efficacious medical practice. Acknowledging a connection between MSCs' biology and their existing microenvironment, donor-controlled clinical practice for the long-term therapeutic benefit is suggested to further consider minimizing MSCs potential harm for MSC-based individual therapies. In this review, we summarize the advantages and disadvantages of autologous vs. allogeneic MSCs in their therapeutic applications. Among other issues, we highlight the importance of better understanding of the various microenvironments that may affect the properties of niche-surrounding MSCs and discuss the clinical applications of MSCs within different contexts for treatment of different diseases including cardiomyopathy, lupus and lupus nephritis, diabetes and diabetic complications, bone and cartilage repair, cancer and tissue fibrosis.

Pathogenesis and Treatment of Refractory Disease Courses in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Refractory Arthritis, Recurrent Macrophage Activation Syndrome and Chronic Lung Disease

Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a distinct and heterogeneous disease presently classified under the umbrella of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, with some patients following a monophasic remitting course, whereas others have persistent disease with chronic organ- and life-threatening complications. Although biologic therapies have revolutionized treatment, recent follow-up studies report significant numbers of children with persistently active disease on long term follow-up. This review focuses on refractory disease courses, specifically refractory arthritis, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with recurrent, or longstanding signs of macrophage activation syndrome, and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated with suspected, probable, or definite lung disease.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in paediatric rheumatic disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A small proportion of children affected by rheumatic diseases suffer from severe, progressive disease, resistant to conventional antirheumatic therapies and to biologic agents interfering with inflammatory cytokines, costimulatory molecules expressed on immune system cells and intracellular signalling pathways. Adding to the poor prognosis is a high risk from significant morbidity and mortality associated with long-term treatment with multiple, often combined anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents. Carefully selected patients from this unfortunate group may benefit from treatment with haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The majority of patients with severe paediatric rheumatic and autoinflammatory diseases treated with autologous and/or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation achieved long-term remission. However, the incidence of disease relapse and transplant related morbidity and mortality is still significant.

SUMMARY

Careful patient and donor selection, timing of the transplant earlier in the course of disease rather than the 'last resort' and choosing the most suitable conditioning regimen for each individual patient are the major factors favouring successful outcome. Close co-operation between the patients, their family, and involved medical teams is essential.

Summarizing current refractory disease definitions in rheumatoid arthritis and polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To identify how refractory disease (or relevant terminology variations) in RA and polyarticular JIA (polyJIA) is defined and establish the key components of such definitions.

METHODS

Searches were undertaken of English-language articles within six medical databases, including manual searching, from January 1998 to March 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42019127142). Articles were included if they incorporated a definition of refractory disease, or non-response, in RA/polyJIA, with clear components to the description. Qualitative content analysis was undertaken to describe refractory disease in RA/polyJIA and classify each component within each definition.

RESULTS

Of 6251 studies screened, 646 met the inclusion criteria; 581 of these applied non-response criteria while 65 provided refractory disease definitions/descriptions. From the non-response studies, 39 different components included various disease activity measures, emphasizing persistent disease activity and symptoms, despite treatment with one or more biologic DMARD (bDMARD). From papers with clear definitions for refractory disease, 41 components were identified and categorized into three key themes: resistance to multiple drugs with different mechanisms of action, typically two or more bDMARDs; persistence of symptoms and disease activity; and other contributing factors. The most common term used was 'refractory' (80%), while only 16.9% reported explicitly how their definition was generated (e.g. clinical experience or statistical methods).

CONCLUSION

Refractory disease is defined as resistance to multiple drugs with different mechanisms of action by persistence of physical symptoms and high disease activity, including contributing factors. A clear unifying definition needs implementing, as the plethora of different definitions makes study comparisons and appropriate identification of patients difficult.

Uncharted waters: mesenchymal stem cell treatment for pediatric refractory rheumatic diseases; a single center case series

BACKGROUND

With the advent of innovative therapies including biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, children with rheumatic diseases are more likely to have improved outcomes. Despite these advances, some children do not respond, or they, or their parents fear adverse events and seek other alternatives. Increasingly, private companies are offering mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) as an alternative, which are described as natural therapies for rheumatic diseases, often insinuating them as a cure. MSC have immunomodulatory properties, and transplantation of these stem cells have been used to successfully treat immunologic conditions like graft-versus-host disease. Lately, MSC research in adult lupus has been encouraging, but the clinical trials are still underway and in most, MSC therapy is not a standalone treatment. This retrospective case series will highlight three cases of pediatric refractory autoimmune disease whose parents sought out and received MSC therapy as a self-decision without first seeking medical advice from our specialty. The three families felt that their children were improved and in two believed that their child was cured. MSC have the potential of beneficial immunomodulation and may be a powerful tool in the therapy of rheumatic disease, but well controlled clinical trials are necessary and should be designed and monitored by experts in childhood rheumatic disease.

CASE PRESENTATION

Three children with three different rheumatic diseases; systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease and juvenile idiopathic arthritis were under the care of pediatric rheumatology at a large, tertiary-care, teaching institution. Multiple non-biologic and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs failed to significantly decrease disease activity, and as a result, the families chose to undergo MSC therapy. After transplantation, all children improved per patient and parent report and tapered off conventional immunosuppressive drugs. No serious adverse events occurred in these three patients.

CONCLUSION

The three cases presented in this report reflect comparable beneficial outcomes and minimal risks published in adult studies. These were not controlled studies, however, and benefit was reported rather than documented. These cases suggest that MSC transplantation may prove a promising adjunctive treatment option; however, further research, development of standardized infusion therapy protocols, and well-designed monitored clinical trials are essential.

[Clinical characteristics and biological treatment of adult patient with juvenile idiopathic arthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical characteristics and biological treatment of juvenile Idiopathic arthritis (JIA) after adulthood.

METHODS

Selected 358 patients with previous medical history diagnosed by JIA who were hospitalized in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2019. Perform retrospective analysis of basic information, clinical symptoms, diagnostic indicators, treatment plans, outpatient follow-up (inpatients require outpatient follow-up treatment) and diagnosis and treatment process of 90 eligible cases included, and observe different ages and different courses of disease. The clinical characteristics of young and middle-aged idiopathic arthritis in adults and the outpatient situation of using biological agents for 6 months.

RESULTS

According to age, they were divided into ≤26 years old group (42 cases) and >26 years old group (48 cases). Under examination [rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), anti-neutrophil antibody (ANCA), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cell count (WBC), human leukocyte antigen-B27 (HLA-B27), complement 3 (C3), etc.], concurrent in terms of symptoms, treatment and prognosis, the ≤26-year-old group was generally lighter than the >26-year-old group; that was, the older the age, the heavier the onset of inflammation and other symptoms, the more complications, the worse the treatment effect, and the worse the prognosis, and there were statistical differences academic significance (P < 0.05). According to the course of disease, they were divided into ≤19 years group (46 cases) and >19 years group (44 cases). In terms of examination (RF, ANA, ANCA, ESR, CRP, IL-1β, IL-6, HGB, HLA-B27, C3, etc.), complications, treatment and prognosis, the course of disease ≤19 years group was compared with the disease course> 19 years group Overall mild; that was, the longer the course of the disease, the more severe the onset of symptoms such as inflammation, the more complications, the worse the treatment effect, and the worse the prognosis, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant. After 6 months of outpatient treatment with biological agents, it was found that biological agents could improve some of the patients' clinical symptoms and delay the further development of the disease. Compared with the non-biological agent treatment group (48 cases), the biological agent group (42 cases) benefited, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Through retrospective analysis, this article believes that although adult JIA is diagnosed as connective tissue disease, it has special clinical characteristics with the course of the disease and age. Therefore, it should be recommended to give special attention to JIA patients after adulthood, require regular medical treatment in the adult rheumatology department, according to the corresponding connective tissue disease or JIA diagnosis, and standard treatment; at the same time, pay attention to the history of JIA. In the comparison of biological and non-biological treatment, it is proved that biological treatment can effectively improve some of the clinical symptoms of JIA patients after adulthood. Therefore, it is recommended that biological treatment be used as soon as possible if economic conditions permit to delay the development of the disease.

Immune Pathogenesis of COVID-19 Intoxication: Storm or Silence?

Dysregulation of the immune system undoubtedly plays an important and, perhaps, determining role in the COVID-19 pathogenesis. While the main treatment of the COVID-19 intoxication is focused on neutralizing the excessive inflammatory response, it is worth considering an equally significant problem of the immunosuppressive conditions including immuno-paralysis, which lead to the secondary infection. Therefore, choosing a treatment strategy for the immune-mediated complications of coronavirus infection, one has to pass between Scylla and Charybdis, so that, in the fight against the "cytokine storm," it is vital not to miss the point of the immune silence that turns into immuno-paralysis.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells and Exosomes: Progress and Challenges

Due to their robust immunomodulatory capabilities, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as a cellular therapy for a number of human diseases. Part of the mechanism of action of MSCs is the production of extracellular vesicles (EVs) that contain proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids that transmit signals to recipient cells that change their biologic behavior. This review briefly summarizes the development of MSCs as a treatment for human diseases as well as describes our present understanding of exosomes; how they exert their effects on target cells, and how they are differentiated from other EVs. The current treatment paradigm for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) is discussed, and how MSCs and MSC derived exosomes are emerging as treatment options for treating patients after radiation exposure. Other conditions such as graft-versus-host disease and cardiovascular disease/stroke are discussed as examples to highlight the immunomodulatory and regenerative capacity of MSC-exosomes. Finally, a consideration is given to how these cell-based therapies could possibly be deployed in the event of a catastrophic radiation exposure event.