1
|
Arraras JI, Giesinger J, Shamieh O, Bahar I, Koller M, Bredart A, Costantini A, Greimel E, Sztankay M, Wintner LM, de Sousa MC, Ishiki H, Kontogianni M, Wolan M, Kikawa Y, Lanceley A, Gioulbasanis I, Harle A, Zarandona U, Kulis D, Kuljanic K. An international field study for the reliability and validity of the EORTC communication questionnaire EORTC QLQ-COMU26. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2024; 22:87. [PMID: 39385305 PMCID: PMC11465687 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02298-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EORTC Quality of Life Group has developed a questionnaire to evaluate cancer patients' perception of their communication with healthcare professionals (HCPs): the EORTC QLQ-COMU26. In this study we test the validity and reliability of this novel measure in an international and culturally diverse sample of cancer patients. METHODS Cancer patients completed the following EORTC questionnaires at two time points (before and during treatment): the QLQ-COMU26 (including a debriefing questionnaire), the QLQ-C30, and specific IN-PATSAT32 scales. These data were used to assess: the cross-cultural applicability, acceptability, scale structure, reliability, convergent/divergent validity, known-groups validity, and responsiveness to change of the QLQ-COMU26. RESULTS Data were collected from 498 patients with various cancer diagnoses in 10 European countries, Japan, Jordan and India (overall 5 cultural regions). At most, only 3% of patients identified an item as confusing and 0.6% as upsetting, which indicates that the questionnaire was clear and did not trigger negative emotional responses. Confirmatory factor analysis and multi-trait scaling confirmed the hypothesised QLQ-COMU26 scale structure comprising six multi-item scales and four single items (RMSEA = 0.025). Reliability was good for all scales (internal consistency > 0.70; test-retest reliability > 0.85). Convergent validity was supported by correlations of ≥ 0.50 with related scales of the IN-PATSAT32 and correlations < 0.30 with unrelated QLQ-C30 scales. Known-groups validity was shown according to sex, education, levels of anxiety and depression, satisfaction with communication, disease stage and treatment intention, professional evaluated, and having a companion during the visit. The QLQ-COMU26 captured changes over time in groups that were defined based on changes in the item of satisfaction with communication. CONCLUSION The EORTC QLQ-COMU26 is a reliable and valid measure of patients' perceptions of their communication with HCPs. The EORTC QLQ-COMU26 can be used in daily clinical practice and research and in various cancer patient groups from different cultures. This questionnaire can help to improve communication between patients and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ignacio Arraras
- Oncology Departments, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, Pamplona, 31008, Spain.
| | - Johannes Giesinger
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Iqbal Bahar
- Cachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Silchar, India
| | - Michael Koller
- Centre for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Anne Bredart
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, SHARE - SHs And Outcome Research Team, Institut Curie and City University, Paris, France
| | - Anna Costantini
- S. Psycho-Oncology Service, Sant'Andrea Universitary Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Monika Sztankay
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lisa M Wintner
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marina Carreiro de Sousa
- Universidade Dos Açores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
- Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | | | | | | | - Anne Lanceley
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Gioulbasanis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Animus Kyanus Stavros General Clinic, Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Uxue Zarandona
- Oncology Departments, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdiSNA), Irunlarrea 3, Pamplona, 31008, Spain
| | - Dagmara Kulis
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Odumegwu JN, Chavez-Yenter D, Goodman MS, Kaphingst KA. Associations between subjective social status and predictors of interest in genetic testing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:1201-1212. [PMID: 38700724 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01878-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic testing for gene mutations which elevate risk for breast cancer is particularly important for women diagnosed at a young age. Differences remain in access and utilization to testing across social groups, and research on the predictors of interest in genetic testing for women diagnosed at a young age is limited. METHODS We examined the relationships between subjective social status (SSS) and variables previously identified as possible predictors of genetic testing, including genome sequencing knowledge, genetic worry, cancer worry, health consciousness, decision-making preferences, genetic self-efficacy, genetic-related beliefs, and subjective numeracy, among a cohort of women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. RESULTS In this sample (n = 1,076), those who had higher SSS had significantly higher knowledge about the limitations of genome sequencing (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.01-1.21) and significantly higher informational norms (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.19-3.14) than those with lower SSS. Similarly, education (OR = 2.75; 95% CI = 1.79-4.22), health status (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.44-3.31) were significant predictors among higher SSS women compared to lower SSS women in our multivariate analysis. Lower SSS women with low self-reported income (OR = 0.13; 95% CI = 0.08-0.20) had lower odds of genetic testing interest. Our results are consistent with some prior research utilizing proxy indicators for socioeconomic status, but our research adds the importance of using a multidimensional indicator such as SSS to examine cancer and genetic testing predictor outcomes. CONCLUSION To develop interventions to improve genetic knowledge, researchers should consider the social status and contexts of women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age (or before 40 years old) to ensure equity in the distribution of genetic testing benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan N Odumegwu
- Department of Biostatistics, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Chavez-Yenter
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Cancer Control & Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Department of Biostatistics, NYU School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Cancer Control & Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tercyak KP, DeMarco TA, Schneider KA, Luta G, Isaacs C, Garber JE, Sleiman MM, Yockel MR, Peshkin BN. Results of a randomized controlled trial of a decision support intervention for disclosing maternal BRCA genetic test results to children and adolescents. PEC INNOVATION 2023; 2:100129. [PMID: 37214493 PMCID: PMC10194096 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective Evaluate the impact of a targeted family communication intervention for mothers undergoing genetic counseling and testing (GCT) for BRCA gene alterations. Methods Following BRCA GCT, mothers (N = 204; M age = 45 y) were randomized to either a control condition (self-help print materials) or intervention (printed decision support guide, based on behavioral decision making theory in health care) for supporting choices about disclosing maternal genetic test results to children and adolescents. Behavioral assessments were administered prior to maternal GCT and after receipt of results: primary outcomes were maternal disclosure to children and parent-child communication quality. Results Mothers in the intervention were > 2x likely to disclose their BRCA test results to their children compared to those in the control condition (odds ratio [OR] = 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06, 5.10; p = .04). This effect was moderated by children's ages: mothers of preteens (<13 y) assigned to the intervention were >3x likely to disclose their results (OR = 3.74, 95% CI = 1.49, 9.41; p = .005). In adjusted models, intervention was also associated with favorable changes in the quality of parent-child communication (95% CI = 0.30, 9.00; p < .05). Conclusion Decision support improves parent-child communication outcomes about GCT for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Innovation This trial is among the first to empirically evaluate the outcomes of a behavioral intervention to support family communication of maternal BRCA risk information to children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth P. Tercyak
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - George Luta
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Marcelo M. Sleiman
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mary Rose Yockel
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Beth N. Peshkin
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buller H, Ferrell BR, Paice JA, Glajchen M, Haythorn T. Interprofessional communication training to address spiritual aspects of cancer care. J Health Care Chaplain 2023; 29:399-411. [PMID: 35853097 PMCID: PMC9850499 DOI: 10.1080/08854726.2022.2097781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Effective communication is essential for palliative care clinicians to provide quality spiritual care to cancer patients. Despite attention to spiritual needs having the potential to positively impact a patient's quality of life, clinicians continue to report a lack of confidence in addressing a patient's spiritual distress. This article addresses the development of a 3-day train-the-trainer communication cancer education program (ICC: Interprofessional Communication Curriculum) organized by the 8 domains of the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care. The main objectives of ICC are to train adult oncology clinicians (nurses, social workers, and chaplains) in communication skills across all aspects of palliative care and to help prepare them to provide communication skills training to their colleagues at their home institutions. ICC participants attend in dyads consisting of differing disciplines and create 3 goals for implementing institutional change. To date, 126 participants (69 teams) have attended an ICC training. Pre-course survey results identified spiritual care as participants' least effective area of communication. Immediate post-course evaluation data revealed the spiritual care module and its subsequent lab session as the most useful sessions to participant's practice. Data from the 6-and-12-months post-course follow-up revealed participant's quality improvement projects focused heavily on improving spiritual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley Buller
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Pop Sci Bldg 173, Duarte CA 91010
| | - Betty R. Ferrell
- Division of Nursing Research and Education, City of Hope National Medical Center
| | - Judith A. Paice
- Cancer Pain Program, Division, Hematology-Oncology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
| | | | - Trace Haythorn
- Association for Clinical Pastoral Education (ACPE), 55 Ivan Allen Jr. Boulevard, Suite 835, Atlanta, GA 30308
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hult A, Lundgren E, Fröjd C, Lindam A, Jangland E. Patient complaints about communication in cancer care settings: Hidden between the lines. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 114:107838. [PMID: 37295042 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate patient complaints in cancer care settings reported to patient advisory committees (PACs) and describe the frequency and content of communication failures across all reports. METHODS Content analysis, with a summative approach, was applied to cancer care complaints (2016-2020) by 692 patients to PACs in one Swedish healthcare region. RESULTS More than half the patients reported communication failures. Patients reported not receiving proper information, not being listened to, and being treated disrespectfully or impersonally. Communication failures occurred in different stages of the patients' cancer care, from diagnostic workup to end-of-life. Compared with the results of the PACs, communication failures were underreported, and were often combined with complaints in other categories. CONCLUSIONS Communication failures are hidden "between the lines" and do not appear clearly in existing reporting systems. Healthcare must utilize the knowledge conveyed by patient complaints and create conditions and environments that support healthcare providers in delivering person-centered care. PRACTICE IMPLICATION A summary picture of patients' complaints in Swedish cancer care is provided. These results could be used to further improve the patient complaint system. Above all, the results could serve as a "wake-up call" about the importance of communication and a valuable resource in improving cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Hult
- Department of Surgical Sciences (EL), Nursing Research (AH, CL, EJ), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Ewa Lundgren
- Department of Surgical Sciences (EL), Nursing Research (AH, CL, EJ), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Camilla Fröjd
- Department of Surgical Sciences (EL), Nursing Research (AH, CL, EJ), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Lindam
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Unit of Research, Education and Development, Östersund Hospital, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Eva Jangland
- Department of Surgical Sciences (EL), Nursing Research (AH, CL, EJ), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
LeBaron V, Flickinger T, Ling D, Lee H, Edwards J, Tewari A, Wang Z, Barnes LE. Feasibility and acceptability testing of CommSense: A novel communication technology to enhance health equity in clinician-patient interactions. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231184991. [PMID: 37456129 PMCID: PMC10338668 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231184991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Quality patient-clinician communication is paramount to achieving safe and compassionate healthcare, but evaluating communication performance during real clinical encounters is challenging. Technology offers novel opportunities to provide clinicians with actionable feedback to enhance their communication skills. Methods This pilot study evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of CommSense, a novel natural language processing (NLP) application designed to record and extract key metrics of communication performance and provide real-time feedback to clinicians. Metrics of communication performance were established from a review of the literature and technical feasibility verified. CommSense was deployed on a wearable (smartwatch), and participants were recruited from an academic medical center to test the technology. Participants completed a survey about their experience; results were exported to SPSS (v.28.0) for descriptive analysis. Results Forty (n = 40) healthcare participants (nursing students, medical students, nurses, and physicians) pilot tested CommSense. Over 90% of participants "strongly agreed" or "agreed" that CommSense could improve compassionate communication (n = 38, 95%) and help healthcare organizations deliver high-quality care (n = 39, 97.5%). Most participants (n = 37, 92.5%) "strongly agreed" or "agreed" they would be willing to use CommSense in the future; 100% (n = 40) "strongly agreed" or "agreed" they were interested in seeing information analyzed by CommSense about their communication performance. Metrics of most interest were medical jargon, interruptions, and speech dominance. Conclusion Participants perceived significant benefits of CommSense to track and improve communication skills. Future work will deploy CommSense in the clinical setting with a more diverse group of participants, validate data fidelity, and explore optimal ways to share data analyzed by CommSense with end-users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Ling
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Hansung Lee
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - James Edwards
- University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Anant Tewari
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Zhiyuan Wang
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Laura E Barnes
- University of Virginia School of Engineering & Applied Science, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park SY, Kim Y, Kim S, Katapodi MC. Informational needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants: A systematic review and content analysis. Genet Med 2022; 25:100001. [PMID: 36549594 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.100001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Personalized information is paramount to patient-centered communication and decision-making regarding risk management in hereditary cancer syndromes. This systematic review identified information needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants and compared findings based on gender (women vs men) and clinical characteristics (patients with cancer vs previvors and BRCA heterozygotes vs untested relatives). METHODS We screened 8115 studies identified from databases and citation searching. The quality of selected studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Narrative synthesis was conducted based on content analysis. RESULTS From 18 selected studies including 1063 individuals, we identified 9 categories of information needs. Risk of bias in the selected studies was moderate. Men, untested relatives, and racial and ethnic minorities were underrepresented. Frequently required information was personalized cancer risk and risk-reducing strategies, including decision-making, family implications of hereditary cancers, psychological issues, and cascade testing. Subgroup analyses showed that information needs depended on gender, personal cancer history, and cascade testing in relatives. CONCLUSION We identified comprehensive and detailed informational needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants and gaps in international guidelines. Needs for personalized information varied based on gender, health, and genetic testing status. Findings of this study have implications for genetic counseling, tailoring educational materials, and personalizing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Young Park
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoonjoo Kim
- Department of Nursing, College of Healthcare Sciences, Far East University, Eumseong-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sue Kim
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Maria C Katapodi
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yoon HY, You KH, Kwon JH, Kim JS, Rha SY, Chang YJ, Lee SC. Understanding the Social Mechanism of Cancer Misinformation Spread on YouTube and Lessons Learned: Infodemiological Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e39571. [PMID: 36374534 PMCID: PMC9699593 DOI: 10.2196/39571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A knowledge gap exists between the list of required actions and the action plan for countering cancer misinformation on social media. Little attention has been paid to a social media strategy for disseminating factual information while also disrupting misinformation on social media networks. Objective The aim of this study was to, first, identify the spread structure of cancer misinformation on YouTube. We asked the question, “How do YouTube videos play an important role in spreading information about the self-administration of anthelmintics for dogs as a cancer medicine for humans?” Second, the study aimed to suggest an action strategy for disrupting misinformation diffusion on YouTube by exploiting the network logic of YouTube information flow and the recommendation system. We asked the question, “What would be a feasible and effective strategy to block cancer misinformation diffusion on YouTube?” Methods The study used the YouTube case of the self-administration of anthelmintics for dogs as an alternative cancer medicine in South Korea. We gathered Korean YouTube videos about the self-administration of fenbendazole. Using the YouTube application programming interface for the query “fenbendazole,” 702 videos from 227 channels were compiled. Then, videos with at least 50,000 views, uploaded between September 2019 and September 2020, were selected from the collection, resulting in 90 videos. Finally, 10 recommended videos for each of the 90 videos were compiled, totaling 573 videos. Social network visualization for the recommended videos was used to identify three intervention strategies for disrupting the YouTube misinformation network. Results The study found evidence of complex contagion by human and machine recommendation systems. By exposing stakeholders to multiple information sources on fenbendazole self-administration and by linking them through a recommendation algorithm, YouTube has become the perfect infrastructure for reinforcing the belief that fenbendazole can cure cancer, despite government warnings about the risks and dangers of self-administration. Conclusions Health authorities should upload pertinent information through multiple channels and should exploit the existing YouTube recommendation algorithm to disrupt the misinformation network. Considering the viewing habits of patients and caregivers, the direct use of YouTube hospital channels is more effective than the indirect use of YouTube news media channels or government channels that report public announcements and statements. Reinforcing through multiple channels is the key.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ho Young Yoon
- Division of Communication and Media, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Han You
- Department of Media and Communication Studies, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Hye Kwon
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- Daejeon Regional Cancer Center, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Sun Kim
- Division of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong-Si, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Rha
- Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Jung Chang
- Division of Cancer Control and Policy, National Cancer Center Korea, Department of Cancer Control and Population Health, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Cheol Lee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Michael N, Gorelik A, Georgousopoulou E, Sulistio M, Tee P, Hauser K, Kissane D. Patient-caregiver communication concordance in cancer-refinement of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool in an Australian sample. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:7387-7396. [PMID: 35612665 PMCID: PMC9385757 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07163-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to expand the international psychometric validation of the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF) within a sample of Australian cancer patients. METHODS Survey data from 181 cancer patient-caregiver dyads ≥ 18 years of age with solid or haematological cancers were analysed (85.4% response rate). Spearman's rho was used to examine the correlation between CCAT-P and CCAT-F scores and weighted kappa the agreement between them. Exploratory factor analysis using scree plot and Kaiser-Guttman criteria was conducted to evaluate the scale structure. Cronbach's α and Pearson correlation coefficients were used to measure internal consistency and concurrent validity respectively. RESULTS Mean scores were the following: CCAT-P 46.2 (9.8), CCAT-F 45.7 (9.4), and CCAT-PF 24.1 (8.0). We confirmed the poor concordance between patient and caregiver reporting of items in the CCAT-PF, with all but two items having weighted kappa values < 0.20 and Spearman's rho < 0.19. We derived a three-factor solution, disclosure, limitation of treatment, and treatment decision making, with reliability ranging from Cronbach's α = 0.43-0.53. The CCAT-P and CCAT-F showed strong correlations with preparation for decision-making (CCAT-P: r = 0.0.92; CCATF: r = 0.0.93) but were weakly associated with patient/caregiver distress related with having difficult conversations on future care planning. CONCLUSION Preliminary validation of the CCAT-PF in the Australian setting has shown some similar psychometric properties to previously published studies, further supporting its potential utility as a tool to assess patient-caregiver dyadic communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12620001035910 12/10/2020 retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Michael
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia , NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia.
| | - Alex Gorelik
- Monash-Cabrini Department of Musculoskeletal Health and Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine (RMH), University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | | | - Merlina Sulistio
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia , NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia
| | - Patrick Tee
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia , NSW, Australia
| | - Katherine Hauser
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Kissane
- Supportive, Psychosocial and Palliative Care Research Department, Cabrini Health, 646 High Street, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia , NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne VIC, Australia
- Sacred Heart Health Service, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
McDonnell GA, Peshkin BN, DeMarco TA, Peterson SK, Arun BK, Miesfeldt S, O’Neill SC, Schneider K, Garber J, Isaacs C, Luta G, Tercyak KP. Long-Term Adaptation Among Adolescent and Young Adult Children to Familial Cancer Risk. Pediatrics 2022; 150:e2022056339. [PMID: 35859209 PMCID: PMC10646493 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-056339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to examine adolescent and young adult (AYA) children's long-term psychosocial and behavioral adaptation to disclosure of maternal BRCA-positive carrier status (BRCA+) to inform approaches for familial cancer risk communication, education, and counseling. METHODS Mothers underwent BRCA genetic testing 1 to 5 years earlier. Group differences in AYAs' self-reported outcomes were analyzed by maternal health and carrier status, and child age and sex. RESULTS A total of N = 272 AYAs were enrolled: 76.1% of their mothers were breast or ovarian cancer survivors and 17.3% were BRCA+. AYAs' cancer risk behavior (tobacco and alcohol use, physical activity) and psychologic distress levels did not vary by maternal status. In bivariate analyses, AYAs of cancer-surviving mothers believed themselves to be at greater risk for, and were more knowledgeable about, cancer than AYAs of mothers without cancer. AYAs of BRCA+ mothers were more concerned about cancer, held stronger beliefs about genetic risk, and placed a higher value on learning about genetics. In adjusted models, maternal cancer history (not BRCA+) remained associated with AYAs' greater perceptions of cancer risk (P = .002), and knowledge about cancer (P = .03) and its causes (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS Disclosing maternal BRCA+ status did not influence children's lifestyle behavior or adversely affect quality of life long term. AYAs of BRCA+ mothers were more aware of and interested in genetic risk information. Such families may benefit from support to promote open communication about genetic testing choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glynnis A. McDonnell
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Beth N. Peshkin
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Suzanne C. O’Neill
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Judy Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - George Luta
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Kenneth P. Tercyak
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Can Social Media Be Used as a Community-Building and Support Tool among Jewish Women Impacted by Breast and Ovarian Cancer? An Evidence-Based Observational Report. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 10:healthcare10010051. [PMID: 35052215 PMCID: PMC8775619 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10010051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
About 1 in 40 Ashkenazi Jewish women carry a deleterious mutation in BRCA1/2 genes, predisposing them to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC). Thus, efforts to prevent and control HBOC in the US must include sufficient outreach and education campaigns within and across the Jewish community. Social media (SM) is utilized in public health campaigns focused on cancer, but very little is known about the efficacy of those efforts when directed toward Jewish women at risk for (“previvors”) and affected by (“survivors”) HBOC. Here, we report on outcomes of a targeted SM campaign for this population, as led by a national not-for-profit HBOC advocacy organization. Mixed-methods data were obtained from n = 393 members of the community, including n = 20 key informants, and analyzed for engagement and satisfaction with its SM campaign and HBOC resources. Message recipients identified the SM campaign as helpful/meaningful (82%), of ‘newsworthy’ value (78%), and actionable/navigable (71%): interviews revealed that women were more likely to engage with SM if/when it featured stories relevant to their personal cancer experiences. SM is a valuable public health education tool to address the comprehensive cancer control and prevention needs of those previving and surviving with HBOC, including high-risk Jewish women.
Collapse
|