Grapevine Red Blotch Virus Is Transmitted by the Three-Cornered Alfalfa Hopper in a Circulative, Nonpropagative Mode with Unique Attributes

Two Distinct Genotypes of Spissistilus festinus (Say, 1830) Reproduce and Differentially Transmit Grapevine Red Blotch Virus

Two phenotypically similar but genetically distinct genotypes of Spissistilus festinus (Say, 1830) (Hemiptera: Membracidae), a pest of legume crops in Southern United States and a vector of grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) in California vineyards, exist. No information is available on whether the two S. festinus genotypes, i.e., California (CA) and Southeastern (SE), are sexually compatible or whether the SE genotype can transmit GRBV. In this study, we established mixed mating S. festinus pairs for which the F1 offspring varied phenotypically compared with the offspring of same genotype pairs but acquired GRBV isolate NY175 at similar rates (p = 0.96) and with a similar viral genome copy number (p = 0.34). Likewise, rates of GRBV acquisition were alike for the two parental CA (58%, 61/105) and SE (61%, 65/106) genotypes (p = 0.74), though the GRBV copy number in the salivary glands was overall significantly higher for SE than CA individuals (p = 0.02). Furthermore, the GRBV transmission rate was significantly higher for the SE genotype (89%, 16/18) than the CA genotype (50%, 8/16) (p = 0.04). These results revealed the existence of two sexually compatible S. festinus genotypes with distinct GRBV transmission abilities, suggesting the need to study GRBV ecology in Southeastern United States and areas where the two genotypes might co-exist.

Monitoring the Spread of Grapevine Viruses in Vineyards of Contrasting Agronomic Practices: A Metagenomic Investigation

This study investigated the transmission of grapevine viruses, specifically grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) and grapevine Pinot gris virus (GPGV), in vineyards in Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada. Forty sentinel vines that were confirmed free of GRBV and GPGV by both high-throughput sequencing (HTS) and endpoint polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were introduced to two vineyards (one organic and one conventional) that were heavily infected with both GRBV and GPGV. Four months post-introduction, the sentinel vines were relocated to a phytotron. The HTS results from 15 months post-introduction revealed a widespread infection of GPGV among the sentinel vines but did not detect any GRBV. The GPGV infection rate of sentinel vines in the organic vineyard (13/18) was higher than in the conventional vineyard (1/19). The possibility of an alternative viral reservoir was assessed by testing the most abundant plants in between rows (Medicago sativa, Trifolium repens, Cirsium arvense and Taraxacum officinale), perennial plants in border areas (Fraxinus americana, Ulmus americana, Rhamnus cathartica) and wild grape (unknown Vitis sp.). The HTS result showed that cover crops and perennial plants did not harbor any grapevine viruses, while 4/5 wild grapes tested positive for GPGV but not GRBV. A pairwise sequence identity analysis revealed high similarities between the GPGV isolates found in the established vines on the vineyard and the newly contracted GPGV isolates in the sentinel vines, implicating a recent transmission event. This work provides novel insights into the spread of grapevine viruses in Niagara Region and is also the first direct proof of the spread of GPGV in natural vineyard conditions in North America.

Distinct Red Blotch Disease Epidemiological Dynamics in Two Nearby Vineyards

Grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) causes red blotch disease and is transmitted by the three-cornered alfalfa hopper, Spissistilus festinus. GRBV isolates belong to a minor phylogenetic clade 1 and a predominant clade 2. Spatiotemporal disease dynamics were monitored in a 1-hectare 'Merlot' vineyard planted in California in 2015. Annual surveys first revealed disease onset in 2018 and a 1.6% disease incidence in 2022. Ordinary runs and phylogenetic analyses documented significant aggregation of vines infected with GRBV clade 1 isolates in one corner of the vineyard (Z = -4.99), despite being surrounded by clade 2 isolates. This aggregation of vines harboring isolates from a non-prevalent clade is likely due to infected rootstock material at planting. GRBV clade 1 isolates were predominant in 2018-2019 but displaced by clade 2 isolates in 2021-2022, suggesting an influx of the latter isolates from outside sources. This study is the first report of red blotch disease progress immediately after vineyard establishment. A nearby 1.5-hectare 'Cabernet Sauvignon' vineyard planted in 2008 with clone 4 (CS4) and 169 (CS169) vines was also surveyed. Most CS4 vines that exhibited disease symptoms one-year post-planting, likely due to infected scion material, were aggregated (Z = -1.73). GRBV isolates of both clades were found in the CS4 vines. Disease incidence was only 1.4% in non-infected CS169 vines in 2022 with sporadic infections of isolates from both clades occurring via secondary spread. Through disentangling GRBV infections due to the planting material and S. festinus-mediated transmission, this study illustrated how the primary virus source influences epidemiological dynamics of red blotch disease.

The Three-Cornered Alfalfa Hopper, Spissistilus festinus, Is a Vector of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus in Vineyards

Spissistilus festinus (Hemiptera: Membracidae) transmit grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV, Grablovirus, Geminiviridae) in greenhouse settings; however, their role as a vector of GRBV in vineyards is unknown. Following controlled exposures of aviruliferous S. festinus for two weeks on infected, asymptomatic vines in a California vineyard in June and a 48 h gut clearing on alfalfa, a nonhost of GRBV, approximately half of the released insects tested positive for GRBV (45%, 46 of 102), including in the salivary glands of dissected individuals (11%, 3 of 27), indicating acquisition. Following controlled exposures of viruliferous S. festinus for two to six weeks on GRBV-negative vines in vineyards in California and New York in June, transmission of GRBV was detected when two S. festinus were restricted to a single leaf (3%, 2 of 62 in California; 10%, 5 of 50 in New York) but not with cohorts of 10-20 specimens on entire or half shoots. This work was consistent with greenhouse assays in which transmission was most successful with S. festinus exposed to a single leaf (42%, 5 of 12), but rarely occurred on half shoots (8%, 1 of 13), and never on entire shoots (0%, 0 of 18), documenting that the transmission of GRBV is facilitated through the feeding of fewer S. festinus on a restricted area of grapevine tissue. This work demonstrates S. festinus is a GRBV vector of epidemiological importance in vineyards.

Phenotyping grapevine red blotch virus and grapevine leafroll-associated viruses before and after symptom expression through machine-learning analysis of hyperspectral images

INTRODUCTION

Grapevine leafroll-associated viruses (GLRaVs) and grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) cause substantial economic losses and concern to North America's grape and wine industries. Fast and accurate identification of these two groups of viruses is key to informing disease management strategies and limiting their spread by insect vectors in the vineyard. Hyperspectral imaging offers new opportunities for virus disease scouting.

METHODS

Here we used two machine learning methods, i.e., Random Forest (RF) and 3D-Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), to identify and distinguish leaves from red blotch-infected vines, leafroll-infected vines, and vines co-infected with both viruses using spatiospectral information in the visible domain (510-710nm). We captured hyperspectral images of about 500 leaves from 250 vines at two sampling times during the growing season (a pre-symptomatic stage at veraison and a symptomatic stage at mid-ripening). Concurrently, viral infections were determined in leaf petioles by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assays using virus-specific primers and by visual assessment of disease symptoms.

RESULTS

When binarily classifying infected vs. non-infected leaves, the CNN model reaches an overall maximum accuracy of 87% versus 82.8% for the RF model. Using the symptomatic dataset lowers the rate of false negatives. Based on a multiclass categorization of leaves, the CNN and RF models had a maximum accuracy of 77.7% and 76.9% (averaged across both healthy and infected leaf categories). Both CNN and RF outperformed visual assessment of symptoms by experts when using RGB segmented images. Interpretation of the RF data showed that the most important wavelengths were in the green, orange, and red subregions.

DISCUSSION

While differentiation between plants co-infected with GLRaVs and GRBV proved to be relatively challenging, both models showed promising accuracies across infection categories.

Evaluation of Alfalfa Fields and Pastures as Sources of Spissistilus festinus (Hemiptera: Membracidae): Quantification of Reproductive and Nutritional Parameters

The threecornered alfalfa hopper (Spissistilus festinus) is a pest of grapevine, with damage caused by transmission of grapevine red blotch virus. Because grapevine is not a preferred host of the threecornered alfalfa hopper, abundance in vineyards depends on proximity to source habitats and presence of preferred hosts in vineyard understories. The potential for alfalfa fields and pastures in the Central Valley of California to serve as sources of threecornered alfalfa hopper was evaluated by quantifying parameters associated with threecornered alfalfa hopper reproductive and nutritional status. Laboratory studies determined that the threecornered alfalfa hopper is synovigenic, emerging as an adult prior to initiation of oogenesis and that females have multiple rounds of egg production. Alfalfa fields, irrigated pastures, and vineyards were sampled monthly. Adults were observed year-round in alfalfa fields and pastures, with populations peaking in fall. Gravid females were observed from February through November. While rare, adult threecornered alfalfa hoppers were collected from 2 of 4 sampled vineyards. In spring, adults were observed in samples collected from vineyard ground cover. In fall, adults were observed in samples collected from vineyard ground cover and foliage samples. Samples collected from pastures and vineyards were male biased, whereas equal numbers of males and females were observed in alfalfa fields. Adults collected from alfalfa fields were larger, heavier, and had greater estimated energetic reserves than adults collected from pastures. Adults collected from vineyards were of above average size and had relatively high estimated energetic reserves. Results suggest that alfalfa fields are more likely to serve as sources of threecornered alfalfa hoppers than irrigated pastures and that differences in male and female behavior may affect rates of pathogen transmission.

Analysis of the genome of grapevine red blotch virus and related grabloviruses indicates diversification prior to the arrival of Vitis vinifera in North America

In this study 163 complete whole-genome sequences of the emerging pathogen grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV; genus Grablovirus, family Geminiviridae) were used to reconstruct phylogenies using Bayesian analyses on time-tipped (heterochronous) data. Using different combinations of priors, Bayes factors identified heterochronous datasets (3×200 million chains) generated from strict clock and exponential tree priors as being the most robust. Substitution rates of 3.2×10^-5 subsitutions per site per year (95% HPD 4.3-2.1×10^-5) across the whole of the GRBV genome were estimated, suggesting ancestral GRBV diverged from ancestral wild Vitis latent virus 1 around 9 000 years ago, well before the first documented arrival of Vitis vinifera in North America. Whole-genome analysis of GRBV isolates in a single infected field-grown grapevine across 12 years identified 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms none of which were fixed substitutions: an observation not discordant with the in silico estimate. The substitution rate estimated here is lower than those estimated for other geminiviruses and is the first for a woody-host-infecting geminivirus.

Increasing the activities of protective enzymes is an important strategy to improve resistance in cucumber to powdery mildew disease and melon aphid under different infection/infestation patterns

Powdery mildew, caused by Sphaerotheca fuliginea (Schlecht.) Poll., and melon aphids (Aphis gossypii Glover) are a typical disease and insect pest, respectively, that affect cucumber production. Powdery mildew and melon aphid often occur together in greenhouse production, resulting in a reduction in cucumber yield. At present there are no reports on the physiological and biochemical effects of the combined disease and pest infection/infestation on cucumber. This study explored how cucumbers can regulate photosynthesis, protective enzyme activity, and basic metabolism to resist the fungal disease and aphids. After powdery mildew infection, the chlorophyll and free proline contents in cucumber leaves decreased, while the activities of POD (peroxidase) and SOD (superoxide dismutase) and the soluble protein and MDA (malondialdehyde) contents increased. Cucumber plants resist aphid attack by increasing the rates of photosynthesis and basal metabolism, and also by increasing the activities of protective enzymes. The combination of powdery mildew infection and aphid infestation reduced photosynthesis and basal metabolism in cucumber plants, although the activities of several protective enzymes increased. Aphid attack after powdery mildew infection or powdery mildew infection after aphid attack had the opposite effect on photosynthesis, protective enzyme activity, and basal metabolism regulation. Azoxystrobin and imidacloprid increased the contents of chlorophyll, free proline, and soluble protein, increased SOD activity, and decreased the MDA content in cucumber leaves. However, these compounds had the opposite effect on the soluble sugar content and POD and CAT (catalase) activities. The mixed ratio of the two single agents could improve the resistance of cucumber to the combined infection of powdery mildew and aphids. These results show that cucumber can enhance its pest/pathogen resistance by changing physiological metabolism when exposed to a complex infection system of pathogenic microorganisms and insect pests.

Transmission of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus by Spissistilus festinus [Say, 1830] (Hemiptera: Membracidae) between Free-Living Vines and Vitis vinifera 'Cabernet Franc'

Grapevine red blotch disease emerged within the past decade, disrupting North American vine stock production and vineyard profitability. Our understanding of how grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV), the causal agent of the disease, interacts with its Vitis hosts and insect vector, Spissistilus festinus, is limited. Here, we studied the capabilities of S. festinus to transmit GRBV from and to free-living vines, identified as first-generation hybrids of V. californica and V. vinifera ‘Sauvignon blanc’ (Vcal hybrids), and to and from V. vinifera ‘Cabernet franc’ (Vvin Cf) vines. The transmission rate of GRBV was high from infected Vcal hybrid vines to healthy Vcal hybrid vines (77%, 10 of 13) and from infected Vvin Cf vines to healthy Vcal hybrid vines (100%, 3 of 3). In contrast, the transmission rate of GRBV was low from infected Vcal hybrid vines to healthy Vvin Cf vines (15%, 2 of 13), and from infected Vvin Cf vines to healthy Vvin Cf vines (19%, 5 of 27). No association was found between transmission rates and GRBV titer in donor vines used in transmission assays, but the virus titer was higher in the recipient leaves of Vcal hybrid vines compared with recipient leaves of Vvin Cf vines. The transmission of GRBV from infected Vcal hybrid vines was also determined to be trans-stadial. Altogether, our findings revealed that free-living vines can be a source for the GRBV inoculum that is transmissible by S. festinus to other free-living vines and a wine grape cultivar, illustrating the interconnected roles of the two virus hosts in riparian areas and commercial vineyards, respectively, for virus spread. These new insights into red blotch disease epidemiology will inform the implementation of disease management strategies.

Grapevine Red Blotch Disease Etiology and Its Impact on Grapevine Physiology and Berry and Wine Composition

Grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) has become widespread in the United States since its identification in 2012. GRBV is the causative agent of grapevine red blotch disease (GRBD), which has caused detrimental economic impacts to the grape and wine industry. Understanding viral function, plant–pathogen interactions, and the effects of GRBV on grapevine performance remains essential to developing potential mitigation strategies. This comprehensive review examines the current body of knowledge regarding GRBV, to highlight gaps in the knowledge and potential mitigation strategies for grape growers and winemakers.

Use of Ground Covers to Control Three-Cornered Alfalfa Hopper, Spissistilus festinus (Hemiptera: Membracidae), and Other Suspected Vectors of Grapevine Red Blotch Virus

Grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) is the causal agent of grapevine red blotch disease, which affects wine grapes and leads to reduced crop yield and quality. The pathogen-plant-vector relationship of GRBV is not well understood; however, some possible vectors have been identified: Caladonus coquilletti (Van Duzee; Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), Colladonus reductus (Van Duzee; Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), Erythroneura spp., Melanoliarus sp. (Hemiptera: Cixiidae), Osbornellus borealis DeLong. & Mohr (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), Scaphytopius granticus (Ball; Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), Spissistilus festinus (Say). Of these species, S. festinus has been shown to transmit the virus to uninfected grapevines, making it of particular interest. Since the pathogen-plant-vector relationship of GRBV is not yet completely understood, pesticide use is not necessarily the best way to manage these possible vectors. Here we test if ground cover removal, by discing in spring, could reduce the activity of potential GRBV vectors. We show that S. festinus presence in the canopy was reduced in disc rows compared to just mowing the ground vegetation, whereas there were no differences in presence in the canopy between disc and mow rows of the other possible insect vectors. Erythroneura elegantula (Osborn; Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), a common pest of grapevines but not a candidate GRBV vector, was found to have higher densities in the canopy in disc rows compared to mow rows, an effect possibly mediated by changes in vine vigor associated with ground covers. We conclude that if S. festinus is a primary vector of GRBV, discing ground covers in early spring may be a viable way to reduce their presence in the vine canopy.