1
|
Naqvi SAH, Farhan M, Ahmad M, Kiran R, Fatima N, Shahbaz M, Akram M, Sathiya Seelan JS, Ali A, Ahmad S. Deciphering fungicide resistance in Phytophthora: mechanisms, prevalence, and sustainable management approaches. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2024; 40:302. [PMID: 39150639 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-024-04108-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
The genus Phytophthora contains more than 100 plant pathogenic species that parasitize a wide range of plants, including economically important fruits, vegetables, cereals, and forest trees, causing significant losses. Global agriculture is seriously threatened by fungicide resistance in Phytophthora species, which makes it imperative to fully comprehend the mechanisms, frequency, and non-chemical management techniques related to resistance mutations. The mechanisms behind fungicide resistance, such as target-site mutations, efflux pump overexpression, overexpression of target genes and metabolic detoxification routes for fungicides routinely used against Phytophthora species, are thoroughly examined in this review. Additionally, it assesses the frequency of resistance mutations in various Phytophthora species and geographical areas, emphasizing the rise of strains that are resistant to multiple drugs. The effectiveness of non-chemical management techniques, including biological control, host resistance, integrated pest management plans, and cultural practices, in reducing fungicide resistance is also thoroughly evaluated. The study provides important insights for future research and the development of sustainable disease management strategies to counter fungicide resistance in Phytophthora species by synthesizing current information and identifying knowledge gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Atif Hasan Naqvi
- Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Farhan
- Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Ahmad
- Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan
| | - Rafia Kiran
- Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan
| | - Noor Fatima
- Department of Botany, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, 44444, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Shahbaz
- Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Muhammad Akram
- Department of Botany, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Jaya Seelan Sathiya Seelan
- Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Amjad Ali
- Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Sivas University of Science and Technology, 58140, Sivas, Turkey
| | - Salman Ahmad
- Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, 40100, Punjab, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Runno-Paurson E, Agho CA, Nassar H, Hansen M, Leitaru K, Hallikma T, Cooke DEL, Niinemets Ü. The Variability of Phytophthora infestans Isolates Collected from Estonian Islands in the Baltic Sea. PLANT DISEASE 2024; 108:1645-1658. [PMID: 38127634 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-07-23-1399-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge of a pathogen's genetic variability and population structure is of great importance to effective disease management. In this study, 193 isolates of Phytophthora infestans collected from three Estonian islands were characterized over 3 years using simple sequence repeat (SSR) marker data complemented by information on their mating type and resistance to metalaxyl. In combination with SSR marker data from samples in the neighboring Pskov region of Northwest Russia, the impact of regional and landscape structure on the level of genetic exchange was also examined. Among the 111 P. infestans isolates from Estonian islands, 49 alleles were detected among 12 SSR loci, and 59 SSR multilocus genotypes were found, of which 64% were unique. The genetic variation was higher among years than that among islands, as revealed by the analysis of molecular variance. The frequency of metalaxyl-resistant isolates increased from 9% in 2012 to 30% in 2014, and metalaxyl resistance was most frequent among A1 isolates. The test for isolation by distance among the studied regions was not significant, and coupled with the absence of genetic differentiation, the result revealed gene flow and the absence of local adaptation. The data are consistent with a sexual population in which diversity is driven by an annual germination of soilborne oospores. The absence of shared genotypes over the years has important implications when it comes to the management of diseases. Such population diversity can make it difficult to predict the nature of the outbreak in the coming year as the genetic makeup is different for each year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Runno-Paurson
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Collins A Agho
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Helina Nassar
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Merili Hansen
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Kätlin Leitaru
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Tiit Hallikma
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Ülo Niinemets
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agho CA, Śliwka J, Nassar H, Niinemets Ü, Runno-Paurson E. Machine Learning-Based Identification of Mating Type and Metalaxyl Response in Phytophthora infestans Using SSR Markers. Microorganisms 2024; 12:982. [PMID: 38792811 PMCID: PMC11124124 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12050982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans is the causal agent of late blight in potato. The occurrence of P. infestans with both A1 and A2 mating types in the field may result in sexual reproduction and the generation of recombinant strains. Such strains with new combinations of traits can be highly aggressive, resistant to fungicides, and can make the disease difficult to control in the field. Metalaxyl-resistant isolates are now more prevalent in potato fields. Understanding the genetic structure and rapid identification of mating types and metalaxyl response of P. infestans in the field is a prerequisite for effective late blight disease monitoring and management. Molecular and phenotypic assays involving molecular and phenotypic markers such as mating types and metalaxyl response are typically conducted separately in the studies of the genotypic and phenotypic diversity of P. infestans. As a result, there is a pressing need to reduce the experimental workload and more efficiently assess the aggressiveness of different strains. We think that employing genetic markers to not only estimate genotypic diversity but also to identify the mating type and fungicide response using machine learning techniques can guide and speed up the decision-making process in late blight disease management, especially when the mating type and metalaxyl resistance data are not available. This technique can also be applied to determine these phenotypic traits for dead isolates. In this study, over 600 P. infestans isolates from different populations-Estonia, Pskov region, and Poland-were classified for mating types and metalaxyl response using machine learning techniques based on simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. For both traits, random forest and the support vector machine demonstrated good accuracy of over 70%, compared to the decision tree and artificial neural network models whose accuracy was lower. There were also associations (p < 0.05) between the traits and some of the alleles detected, but machine learning prediction techniques based on multilocus SSR genotypes offered better prediction accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collins A. Agho
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Jadwiga Śliwka
- Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute—National Research Institute in Radzików, Department of Potato Genetics and Parental Lines, Platanowa Str. 19, 05-831 Młochów, Poland
| | - Helina Nassar
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Ülo Niinemets
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
- Estonian Academy of Sciences, Kohtu 6, 10130 Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Eve Runno-Paurson
- Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51006 Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vogel G, Gore MA, Smart CD. Genome-Wide Association Study in New York Phytophthora capsici Isolates Reveals Loci Involved in Mating Type and Mefenoxam Sensitivity. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2021; 111:204-216. [PMID: 32539639 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-20-0112-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora capsici is a soilborne oomycete plant pathogen that causes severe vegetable crop losses in New York (NY) state and worldwide. This pathogen is difficult to manage, in part due to its production of long-lasting sexual spores and its tendency to quickly evolve fungicide resistance. We single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyped 252 P. capsici isolates, predominantly from NY, in order to conduct a genome-wide association study for mating type and mefenoxam sensitivity. The population structure and extent of chromosomal copy number variation in this collection of isolates were also characterized. Population structure analyses showed isolates largely clustered by the field site where they were collected, with values of FST between pairs of fields ranging from 0.10 to 0.31. Thirty-three isolates were putative aneuploids, demonstrating evidence for having up to four linkage groups present in more than two copies, and an additional two isolates appeared to be genome-wide triploids. Mating type was mapped to a region on scaffold 4, consistent with previous findings, and mefenoxam sensitivity was associated with several SNP markers at a novel locus on scaffold 62. We identified several candidate genes for mefenoxam sensitivity, including a homolog of yeast ribosome synthesis factor Rrp5, but failed to locate near the scaffold 62 locus any subunits of RNA polymerase I, the hypothesized target site of phenylamide fungicides in oomycetes. This work expands our knowledge of the population biology of P. capsici and provides a foundation for functional validation of candidate genes associated with epidemiologically important phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Vogel
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - Michael A Gore
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - Christine D Smart
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ayala-Usma DA, Danies G, Myers K, Bond MO, Romero-Navarro JA, Judelson HS, Restrepo S, Fry WE. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Markers Associated with Mycelial Growth (at 15, 20, and 25°C), Mefenoxam Resistance, and Mating Type in Phytophthora infestans. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2020; 110:822-833. [PMID: 31829117 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-06-19-0206-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Phenotypic diversity among individuals defines the potential for evolutionary selection in a species. Phytophthora infestans epidemics are generally thought to be favored by moderate to low temperatures, but temperatures in many locations worldwide are expected to rise as a result of global climate change. Thus, we investigated variation among individuals of P. infestans for relative growth at different temperatures. Isolates of P. infestans came from three collections: (i) individual genotypes recently dominant in the United States, (ii) recently collected individuals from Central Mexico, and (iii) progeny of a recent sexual recombination event in the northeastern United States. In general, these isolates had optimal mycelial growth rates at 15 or 20°C. However, two individuals from Central Mexico grew better at higher temperatures than did most others and two individuals grew relatively less at higher temperatures than did most others. The isolates were also assessed for mefenoxam sensitivity and mating type. Each collection contained individuals of diverse sensitivities to mefenoxam and individuals of the A1 and A2 mating type. We then searched for genomic regions associated with phenotypic diversity using genotyping-by-sequencing. We found one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with variability in mycelial growth at 20°C, two associated with variability in mycelial growth at 25°C, two associated with sensitivity to mefenoxam, and one associated with mating type. Interestingly, the SNPs associated with mefenoxam sensitivity were found in a gene-sparse region, whereas the SNPs associated with growth at the two temperatures and mating type were found both at more gene-dense regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A Ayala-Usma
- Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
- Max Planck Tandem Group in Computational Biology, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - G Danies
- Department of Design, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - K Myers
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A
| | - M O Bond
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A
- Department of Botany, University of Hawaii, Mānoa, HI, U.S.A
| | - J A Romero-Navarro
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A
| | - H S Judelson
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA, U.S.A
| | - S Restrepo
- Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - W E Fry
- Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang W, Liu X, Han T, Li K, Qu Y, Gao Z. Differential Potential of Phytophthora capsici Resistance Mechanisms to the Fungicide Metalaxyl in Peppers. Microorganisms 2020; 8:microorganisms8020278. [PMID: 32085491 PMCID: PMC7074702 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Metalaxyl is one of the main fungicides used to control pepper blight caused by Phytophthora capsici. Metalaxyl resistance of P. capsici, caused by the long-term intense use of this fungicide, has become one of the most serious challenges facing pest management. To reveal the potential resistance mechanism of P. capsici to fungicide metalaxyl, a metalaxyl-resistant mutant strain SD1-9 was obtained under laboratory conditions. The pathogenicity test showed that mutant strain SD1-9 had different pathogenicity to different host plants with or without the treatment of metalaxyl compared with that of the wild type SD1. Comparative transcriptome sequencing of mutant strain SD1-9 and wild type SD1 led to the identification of 3845 differentially expressed genes, among them, 517 genes were upregulated, while 3328 genes were down-regulated in SD1-9 compared to that in the SD1. The expression levels of 10 genes were further verified by real-time RT-PCR. KEGG analysis showed that the differentially expressed genes were enriched in the peroxisome, endocytosis, alanine and tyrosine metabolism. The expression of the candidate gene XLOC_020226 during 10 life history stages was further studied, the results showed that expression level reached a maximum at the zoospores stage and basically showed a gradually increasing trend with increasing infection time in pepper leaves in SD1-9 strain, while its expression gradually increased in the SD1 strain throughout the 10 stages, indicated that XLOC_020226 may be related to the growth and pathogenicity of P. capsici. In summary, transcriptome analysis of plant pathogen P. capsici strains with different metalaxyl resistance not only provided database of the genes involved in the metalaxyl resistance of P. capsici, but also allowed us to gain novel insights into the potential resistance mechanism of P. capsici to metalaxyl in peppers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiyan Wang
- College of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 West of Changjiang Road, Hefei 230036, China; (W.W.); (X.L.); (K.L.); (Y.Q.)
- School of Life Sciences, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 West of Changjiang Road, Hefei 230036, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- College of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 West of Changjiang Road, Hefei 230036, China; (W.W.); (X.L.); (K.L.); (Y.Q.)
| | - Tao Han
- School of Horticulture Landscape Architecture, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, East Section of Hualan Avenue, Xinxiang 453003, China;
| | - Kunyuan Li
- College of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 West of Changjiang Road, Hefei 230036, China; (W.W.); (X.L.); (K.L.); (Y.Q.)
| | - Yang Qu
- College of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 West of Changjiang Road, Hefei 230036, China; (W.W.); (X.L.); (K.L.); (Y.Q.)
| | - Zhimou Gao
- College of Plant Protection, Anhui Agricultural University, 130 West of Changjiang Road, Hefei 230036, China; (W.W.); (X.L.); (K.L.); (Y.Q.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-0551-65786322
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Matić S, Gilardi G, Gisi U, Gullino ML, Garibaldi A. Differentiation of Pythium spp. from vegetable crops with molecular markers and sensitivity to azoxystrobin and mefenoxam. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2019; 75:356-365. [PMID: 29888848 DOI: 10.1002/ps.5119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Revised: 05/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pythium species attack various vegetable crops causing seed, stem and root rot, and 'damping-off' after germination. Pythium diseases are prevalently controlled by two classes of fungicides, QoIs with azoxystrobin and phenlyamides with mefenoxam as representatives. The present study aimed to test the sensitivity of six Pythium species from different vegetable crops to azoxystrobin and mefenoxam and differentiating species based on ITS, cytochrome b and RNA polymerase I gene sequences. RESULTS The inter- and intra-species sensitivity to azoxystrobin was found to be stable, with the exception of one Pythium paroecandrum isolate, which showed reduced sensitivity and two cytochrome b amino acid changes. For mefenoxam, the inter-species sensitivity was quite variable and many resistant isolates were found in all six Pythium species, but no RNA polymerase I amino acid changes were observed in them. ITS and cytochrome b phylogenetic analyses permitted a clear separation of Pythium species corresponding to globose- and filamentous-sporangia clusters. CONCLUSION The results document the necessity of well-defined chemical control strategies adapted to different Pythium species. Since the intrinsic activity of azoxystrobin among species was stable and no resistant isolates were found, it may be applied without species differentiation, provided it is used preventatively to also control highly aggressive isolates. For a reliable use of mefenoxam, precise identification and sensitivity tests of Pythium species are crucial because its intrinsic activity is variable and resistant isolates may exist. Appropriate mixtures and/or alternation of products may help to further delay resistance development. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slavica Matić
- AGROINNOVA - Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agro-environmental Sector, Università di Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
| | - Giovanna Gilardi
- AGROINNOVA - Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agro-environmental Sector, Università di Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
| | - Ulrich Gisi
- AGROINNOVA - Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agro-environmental Sector, Università di Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
| | - Maria Lodovica Gullino
- AGROINNOVA - Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agro-environmental Sector, Università di Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
- Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences (DISAFA), Università di Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
| | - Angelo Garibaldi
- AGROINNOVA - Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agro-environmental Sector, Università di Torino, Grugliasco (TO), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen F, Zhou Q, Xi J, Li DL, Schnabel G, Zhan J. Analysis of RPA190 revealed multiple positively selected mutations associated with metalaxyl resistance in Phytophthora infestans. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2018; 74:1916-1924. [PMID: 29457681 DOI: 10.1002/ps.4893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Revised: 02/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metalaxyl is a phenylamide fungicide, introduced for oomycete management in the 1970s. RPA190 gene has been reported to be associated with metalaxyl resistance, although other genes may also be involved in the process. This study assessed the evolutionary association of amino acid (AA) mutations in RPA190 with metalaxyl resistance in Phytophthora infestans. RESULTS All isolates from Yunnan were resistant to metalaxyl with multiple AA mutations in RPA190. Two main evolutionary pathways were found in metalaxyl resistance: in one pathway, RPA190 from sensitive isolates (SAA) underwent a single type AA mutation at position 1476, changing from valine to glycine (V1476G); the second pathway involved multiple steps of point mutations. In a phylogenetic tree, nucleotide sequences of the gene clustered into six clades largely corresponding to AA isoform groups. Among the clusters, sequences carrying mutations V1476G and P980S formed two independent clades; other clades shared a common mutation of F382Y. All three mutations together with another two were shown to be under positive selection and the number of AA mutations in an isolate was positively correlated with EC50 values. CONCLUSION Multiple mutations such as V1476G, P980S, and F382Y in RPA190 contribute to metalaxyl resistance, and resistance to metalaxyl can emerge in at least two independent pathways in P. infestans. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengping Chen
- Key Lab for Biopesticide and Chemical Biology, Ministry of Education, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Qian Zhou
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jing Xi
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Dong-Liang Li
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Guido Schnabel
- Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| | - Jiasui Zhan
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Plant Virology, Institute of Plant Virology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leesutthiphonchai W, Vu AL, Ah-Fong AMV, Judelson HS. How Does Phytophthora infestans Evade Control Efforts? Modern Insight Into the Late Blight Disease. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2018; 108:916-924. [PMID: 29979126 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-18-0130-ia] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
The infamous oomycete Phytophthora infestans has been a persistent threat to potato and tomato production worldwide, causing the diseases known as late blight. This pathogen has proved to be remarkably adept at overcoming control strategies including host-based resistance and fungicides. This review describes the features of P. infestans that make it such a daunting challenge to agriculture. These include a stealthy lifestyle that helps P. infestans evade plant defenses, effectors that suppress host defenses and promote susceptibility, profuse sporulation with a short latent period that enables rapid dissemination, and a genome structure that promotes the adaptive evolution of P. infestans by fostering genetic diversity. Nevertheless, there is reason to be optimistic that accumulated knowledge about the biology of P. infestans and its hosts will lead to improved management of late blight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea L Vu
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside 92521
| | - Audrey M V Ah-Fong
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside 92521
| | - Howard S Judelson
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside 92521
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Miao J, Dong X, Lin D, Wang Q, Liu P, Chen F, Du Y, Liu X. Activity of the novel fungicide oxathiapiprolin against plant-pathogenic oomycetes. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2016; 72:1572-7. [PMID: 26577849 DOI: 10.1002/ps.4189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2015] [Revised: 11/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oxathiapiprolin was the first of the piperidinyl thiazole isoxazoline class of fungicides to be discovered and developed by DuPont in 2007. Although oxathiapiprolin has been reported to have high activity against plant-pathogenic oomycetes, such as Peronospora belbahrii, Phytophthora nicotianae and Ph. capsici, little is known about its effectiveness against other plant-pathogenic oomycetes and its protective and curative properties. RESULTS Oxathiapiprolin exhibited substantial inhibitory activity against all of the plant-pathogenic oomycetes tested, with EC90 values ranging from 0.14 to 3.36 × 10(-3) µg mL(-1) , except the Pythium species Py. aphanidermatum and Py. deliense. Furthermore, doses as low as 10 µg mL(-1) were found to inhibit zoospore release and motility in Ph. capsici, while the mycelial development and sporangial production of Pseudoperonospora cubensis were restrained by an EC50 of 3.10 × 10(-4) and 5.17 × 10(-4) µg mL(-1) respectively. It was also found that oxathiapiprolin exhibited both protective and curative activity against the development of Ph. capsici infection in pepper plants under greenhouse conditions and in field tests. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that the novel fungicide oxathiapiprolin exhibits strong inhibitory activity against a range of agriculturally important plant-pathogenic oomycetes, including Phytophthora spp., Peronophythora litchii, Plasmopara viticola, Pe. parasitica, Ps. cubensis and Py. ultimum. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianqiang Miao
- Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Xue Dong
- Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Lin
- Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Qiushi Wang
- Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Pengfei Liu
- Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| | - Furu Chen
- Institute of Plant Protection, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fujian, China
| | - Yixin Du
- Institute of Plant Protection, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fujian, China
| | - Xili Liu
- Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matson MEH, Small IM, Fry WE, Judelson HS. Metalaxyl Resistance in Phytophthora infestans: Assessing Role of RPA190 Gene and Diversity Within Clonal Lineages. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 105:1594-600. [PMID: 26551315 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-05-15-0129-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Prior work has shown that the inheritance of resistance to metalaxyl, an oomycete-specific fungicide, is complex and may involve multiple genes. Recent research indicated that a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the gene encoding RPA190, the largest subunit of RNA polymerase I, confers resistance to metalaxyl (or mefenoxam) in some isolates of the potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Using both DNA sequencing and high resolution melt assays for distinguishing RPA190 alleles, we show here that the SNP is absent from certain resistant isolates of P. infestans from North America, Europe, and Mexico. The SNP is present in some members of the US-23 and US-24 clonal lineages, but these tend to be fairly sensitive to the fungicide based on artificial media and field test data. Diversity in the level of sensitivity, RPA190 genotype, and RPA190 copy number was observed in these lineages but were uncorrelated. Controlled laboratory crosses demonstrated that RPA190 did not cosegregate with metalaxyl resistance from a Mexican and British isolate. We conclude that while metalaxyl may be used to control many contemporary strains of P. infestans, an assay based on RPA190 will not be sufficient to diagnose the sensitivity levels of isolates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E H Matson
- First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521; and second and third authors: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - Ian M Small
- First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521; and second and third authors: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - William E Fry
- First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521; and second and third authors: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - Howard S Judelson
- First and fourth authors: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521; and second and third authors: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cohen Y, Van den Langenberg KM, Wehner TC, Ojiambo PS, Hausbeck M, Quesada-Ocampo LM, Lebeda A, Sierotzki H, Gisi U. Resurgence of Pseudoperonospora cubensis: The Causal Agent of Cucurbit Downy Mildew. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 105:998-1012. [PMID: 25844827 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-11-14-0334-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The downy mildew pathogen, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, which infects plant species in the family Cucurbitaceae, has undergone major changes during the last decade. Disease severity and epidemics are far more destructive than previously reported, and new genotypes, races, pathotypes, and mating types of the pathogen have been discovered in populations from around the globe as a result of the resurgence of the disease. Consequently, disease control through host plant resistance and fungicide applications has become more complex. This resurgence of P. cubensis offers challenges to scientists in many research areas including pathogen biology, epidemiology and dispersal, population structure and population genetics, host preference, host-pathogen interactions and gene expression, genetic host plant resistance, inheritance of host and fungicide resistance, and chemical disease control. This review serves to summarize the current status of this major pathogen and to guide future management and research efforts within this pathosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yigal Cohen
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kyle M Van den Langenberg
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Todd C Wehner
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter S Ojiambo
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mary Hausbeck
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lina M Quesada-Ocampo
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Aleš Lebeda
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Helge Sierotzki
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ulrich Gisi
- First author: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 52100, Israel; second and third authors: Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fourth and sixth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695; fifth author: Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1312; seventh author: Palacký University, Faculty of Science, Department of Botany, 78371 Olomouc, Czech Republic; eighth and ninth authors: Syngenta Crop Protection AG, CH-4432 Stein, Switzerland; and ninth author: Department of Environmental Sciences, Institute of Botany, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fry WE, Birch PRJ, Judelson HS, Grünwald NJ, Danies G, Everts KL, Gevens AJ, Gugino BK, Johnson DA, Johnson SB, McGrath MT, Myers KL, Ristaino JB, Roberts PD, Secor G, Smart CD. Five Reasons to Consider Phytophthora infestans a Reemerging Pathogen. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 105:966-81. [PMID: 25760519 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-15-0005-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Phytophthora infestans has been a named pathogen for well over 150 years and yet it continues to "emerge", with thousands of articles published each year on it and the late blight disease that it causes. This review explores five attributes of this oomycete pathogen that maintain this constant attention. First, the historical tragedy associated with this disease (Irish potato famine) causes many people to be fascinated with the pathogen. Current technology now enables investigators to answer some questions of historical significance. Second, the devastation caused by the pathogen continues to appear in surprising new locations or with surprising new intensity. Third, populations of P. infestans worldwide are in flux, with changes that have major implications to disease management. Fourth, the genomics revolution has enabled investigators to make tremendous progress in terms of understanding the molecular biology (especially the pathogenicity) of P. infestans. Fifth, there remain many compelling unanswered questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W E Fry
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - P R J Birch
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - H S Judelson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - N J Grünwald
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - G Danies
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - K L Everts
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - A J Gevens
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - B K Gugino
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - D A Johnson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - S B Johnson
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - M T McGrath
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - K L Myers
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - J B Ristaino
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - P D Roberts
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - G Secor
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| | - C D Smart
- First, fifth, and twelfth authors: Cornell University, Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, 334 Plant Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14850; second author: Division of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 4DA, UK; third author: Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Riverside 92521; fourth author: Horticultural Crops Research Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, 3420 NW Orchard Ave., Corvallis, OR 97330; sixth author: Plant Pathology Department, University of Maryland, 27664 Nanticoke Rd., Salisbury 21801; seventh author: University of Wisconsin Department of Plant Pathology, 1630 Linden Dr., Madison 53706-1598; eighth author: Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 219 Buckhout Lab, University Park 16802; ninth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, PO Box 646430, Pullman; tenth author: University of Maine Cooperative Extension, 57 Houlton Road, Presque Isle 04769; eleventh author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Long Island Horticultural Research & Extension Center, Riverhead, NY 11901-1098; thirteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, Room 2419 Gardner Hall, NC State University, Raleigh 27695; fourteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, 2685 SR 29 N, Immokalee 34142-9515; fifteenth author: Department of Plant Pathology, North Dakota State University, 328 Walster Hall, Dept. 7660, PO Box6050, Fargo 58108-6050; and sixteenth author: Section of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Barton Lab, NYSAES, 630 West North Street, Geneva, NY 14456
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Childers R, Danies G, Myers K, Fei Z, Small IM, Fry WE. Acquired Resistance to Mefenoxam in Sensitive Isolates of Phytophthora infestans. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2015; 105:342-9. [PMID: 25226526 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-05-14-0148-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The systemic fungicide mefenoxam has been important in the control of late blight disease caused by Phytophthora infestans. This phenylamide fungicide has a negative effect on the synthesis of ribosomal RNA; however, the genetic basis for inherited field resistance is still not completely clear. We recently observed that a sensitive isolate became tolerant after a single passage on mefenoxam-containing medium. Further analyses revealed that all sensitive isolates tested (in three diverse genotypes) acquired this resistance equally quickly. In contrast, isolates that were "resistant" to mefenoxam in the initial assessment (stably resistant) did not increase in resistance upon further exposure. However, there appeared to be a cost associated with acquired resistance in the initially sensitive isolates, in that isolates with acquired resistance grew more slowly on mefenoxam-free medium than did the same isolates that had never been exposed to mefenoxam. The acquired resistance of the sensitive isolates declined slightly with subsequent culturing on medium free of mefenoxam. To investigate the mechanism of acquired resistance, we employed strand-specific RNA sequencing. Many differentially expressed genes were genotype specific, but one set of genes was differentially expressed in all genotypes. Among these were several genes (a phospholipase "Pi-PLD-like-3," two ATP-binding cassette superfamily [ABC] transporters, and a mannitol dehydrogenase) that were up-regulated and whose function might contribute to a resistance phenotype.
Collapse
|
15
|
Randall E, Young V, Sierotzki H, Scalliet G, Birch PRJ, Cooke DEL, Csukai M, Whisson SC. Sequence diversity in the large subunit of RNA polymerase I contributes to Mefenoxam insensitivity in Phytophthora infestans. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2014; 15:664-76. [PMID: 24521429 PMCID: PMC6638662 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.12124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Phenylamide fungicides have been widely used for the control of oomycete-incited plant diseases for over 30 years. Insensitivity to this chemical class of fungicide was recorded early in its usage history, but the precise protein(s) conditioning insensitivity has proven difficult to determine. To determine the genetic basis of insensitivity and to inform strategies for the cloning of the gene(s) responsible, genetic crosses were established between Mefenoxam sensitive and intermediate insensitive isolates of Phytophthora infestans, the potato late blight pathogen. F1 progeny showed the expected semi-dominant phenotypes for Mefenoxam insensitivity and suggested the involvement of multiple loci, complicating the positional cloning of the gene(s) conditioning insensitivity to Mefenoxam. Instead, a candidate gene strategy was used, based on previous observations that the primary effect of phenylamide compounds is to inhibit ribosomal RNA synthesis. The subunits of RNA polymerase I (RNApolI) were sequenced from sensitive and insensitive isolates and F1 progeny. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) specific to insensitive field isolates were identified in the gene encoding the large subunit of RNApolI. In a survey of field isolates, SNP T1145A (Y382F) showed an 86% association with Mefenoxam insensitivity. Isolates not showing this association belonged predominantly to one P. infestans genotype. The transfer of the 'insensitive' allele of RPA190 to a sensitive isolate yielded transgenic lines that were insensitive to Mefenoxam. These results demonstrate that sequence variation in RPA190 contributes to insensitivity to Mefenoxam in P. infestans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Randall
- Cell and Molecular Sciences, James Hutton Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, DD2 5DA, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Céspedes MC, Cárdenas ME, Vargas AM, Rojas A, Morales JG, Jiménez P, Bernal AJ, Restrepo S. Physiological and molecular characterization of Phytophthora infestans isolates from the Central Colombian Andean Region. Rev Iberoam Micol 2012; 30:81-7. [PMID: 23036748 DOI: 10.1016/j.riam.2012.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2012] [Revised: 07/27/2012] [Accepted: 09/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late blight, caused by Phytophthora infestans, is one of the most devastating diseases found in potato and tomato crops worldwide. In Colombia it also attacks other important crops: cape gooseberry and tree tomato. The knowledge of the pathogen population is determinant to effectively design control strategies. AIMS To determine the physiological and molecular characteristics of a set of Colombian P. infestans isolates. METHODS Strains isolated from Cundinamarca and Boyacá were examined for the level of resistance to mefenoxam and cymoxanil. Virulence was tested for all strains and crosses between A1 mating type, from different hosts, and the Colombian A2 mating type were tested for the production and viability of oospores in different substrates. Additionally, the molecular diversity of the avirulence gene Avr3a, the β-tubulin gene, and two single copy genes showing RxLR motif, was assessed. RESULTS We found all levels of mefenoxam sensitivity, with 48% of the strains resistant. A high diversity of races was detected and the population was genetically clonal. Colombian strains had the possibility of sexual reproduction. CONCLUSIONS These results will help in optimizing the use of fungicides and deployment of resistance as control strategies and will contribute to broader studies on diversity of this pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María C Céspedes
- Laboratorio de Micología y Fitopatología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, DC, Colombia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Heesch S, Cho GY, Peters AF, Le Corguillé G, Falentin C, Boutet G, Coëdel S, Jubin C, Samson G, Corre E, Coelho SM, Cock JM. A sequence-tagged genetic map for the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus provides large-scale assembly of the genome sequence. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2010; 188:42-51. [PMID: 20456050 DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03273.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
• Ectocarpus siliculosus has been proposed as a genetic and genomic model for the brown algae and the 214 Mbp genome of this organism has been sequenced. The aim of this project was to obtain a chromosome-scale view of the genome by constructing a genetic map using microsatellite markers that were designed based on the sequence supercontigs. • To map genetic markers, a segregating F(2) population was generated from a cross between the sequenced strain (Ec 32) and a compatible strain from northern Chile. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis indicated a significant degree of polymorphism (41%) between the genomes of these two parental strains. Of 1,152 microsatellite markers that were selected for analysis based on their location on long supercontigs, their potential as markers and their predicted ability to amplify a single genomic locus, 407 were found to be polymorphic. • A genetic map was constructed using 406 markers, resulting in 34 linkage groups. The 406 markers anchor 325 of the longest supercontigs on to the map, representing 70.1% of the genome sequence. • The Ectocarpus genetic map described here not only provides a large-scale assembly of the genome sequence, but also represents an important tool for future genetic analysis using this organism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Heesch
- UPMC Univ. Paris 06, The Marine Plants and Biomolecules Laboratory, UMR 7139, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, BP74, 29682 Roscoff Cedex, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gent DH, Nelson ME, Grove GG. Persistence of Phenylamide Insensitivity in Pseudoperonospora humuli. PLANT DISEASE 2008; 92:463-468. [PMID: 30769683 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-92-3-0463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Downy mildew, caused by Pseudoperonospora humuli, is an important disease of hop in most production regions in the northern hemisphere. Insensitivity to phenylamide fungicides was detected in isolates of P. humuli in production regions in Oregon and Idaho in 1992, and these fungicides since have been used on a limited basis. In this study, the prevalence of phenylamide insensitivity among isolates of P. humuli collected from 2005 to 2007 in the northwestern United States was quantified using a leaf disk assay with a discriminating dose (25 μg/ml) of either metalaxyl or mefenoxam with inoculum derived from 201 systemically infected diseased shoots (basal spikes) collected from 6, 10, and 11 hop yards in Idaho, Washington, and Oregon, respectively. A subset of 47 basal spike isolates and 42 monosporic isolates collected from two yards in Idaho and nine yards in Oregon during 2006 and 2007 were assayed using a dilution series of metalaxyl to determine the effective dose that inhibited 50% of the incidence of sporulation (ED50). Insensitivity to mefenoxam was detected in 31 of 74 (41.9%) basal spikes collected from 13 hop yards. Insensitivity to the related compound metalaxyl was detected in 52 of 80 (65%) spikes collected from nine hop yards, including four hop yards in Washington. Log ED50 values ranged from -2.25 to 2.67 for basal spike isolates and -2.27 to 2.98 for monosporic isolates and had a similar distribution. Log ED50 values for monosporic isolates and entire basal spike isolates were significantly associated. However, the slope of the regression line was less than 1, indicating that the log ED50 values obtained from entire basal spike isolates were greater than the corresponding log ED50 values obtained from a monosporic isolate obtained from that spike. This research suggests that insensitivity to phenylamide fungicides is a stable phenotype in P. humuli. Management of downy mildew should rely on measures other than these fungicides in yards or regions where phenylamide insensitivity is prevalent, which is now known to include certain hop yards in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, and Oregon State University, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Corvallis 97331
| | - Mark E Nelson
- Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| | - Gary G Grove
- Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser 99350
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rubin E, Cohen Y. An Improved Method for Infecting Tomato Leaves or Seedlings with Oospores of Phytophthora infestans Used to Investigate F1 Progeny. PLANT DISEASE 2006; 90:741-749. [PMID: 30781233 DOI: 10.1094/pd-90-0741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
An improved, soil-free laboratory method was developed to induce late blight infection in detached tomato leaves or tomato seedlings with in vivo-produced oospores of Phytophthora infestans. Oospores were produced in detached tomato leaves infected with an inoculum mixture of A1 and A2 isolates. The infected leaves were homogenized in distilled water. The homogenates were exposed to two cycles of drying and wetting to kill sporangia, zoospores, and mycelia and, thereafter, mixed with perlite and water. Tomato leaves or seed were floated on the perlite mixture in petri dishes and incubated for up to 30 days. Results from 13 experiments showed that, in dishes containing oospores, 96 of 820 leaflets (11.7%) developed late blight lesions within 6 to 30 days; whereas, in 3 experiments with seedlings, 12 of 1,400 plants (0.9%) were blighted within 17 to 26 days. No late blight developed in leaflets or seedlings maintained in dishes containing homogenates of the control leaves infected with either A1 or A2 inoculum. In all, 234 single-sporangium F1 isolates recovered from 24 leaf lesions produced by four crosses and 27 isolates recovered from 12 seedlings infected with two crosses were examined for sensitivity to metalaxyl and mating type. Results showed that, although the parent isolates were either S (sensitive) or R (resistant) to metalaxyl, most F1 progeny isolates exhibited various levels of intermediate resistance to metalaxyl. Most isolates belonged to either the A1 or the A2 mating type, depending on the cross and lesion. However, some isolates belonged to the unusual mating type A1A2 or were sterile. Current experiments are intended to elucidate the virulence and aggressiveness of these F1 progenies to tomato. This improved method may facilitate our understanding of the role of in vivo-produced oospores in the epidemiology of late blight in tomato.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgenia Rubin
- Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Yigal Cohen
- Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Judelson HS, Senthil G. Investigating the role of ABC transporters in multifungicide insensitivity in Phytophthora infestans. MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY 2006; 7:17-29. [PMID: 20507425 DOI: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00256.x-i1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Isolates of the oomycete Phytophthora infestans exhibit a wide range of intrinsic sensitivities to fungicides, which potentially influences the application rates of chemicals needed to control potato late blight. To help understand what determines such levels of sensitivity, a genetic approach was employed which followed the segregation of sensitivities to structurally diverse fungicides such as metalaxyl and trifloxystrobin. Progeny exhibited broad distributions of sensitivity phenotypes, consistent with the behaviour of a quantitative trait. Measurements of the inhibition of strains by seven fungicides revealed that basal sensitivities to metalaxyl and trifloxystrobin, and to cymoxanil and dimethomorph, correlated at the 95% confidence level. These compounds have distinct modes of action, suggesting the involvement of a multifungicide efflux phenomenon mediated by ABC transporters. To determine whether such proteins contribute to variation in sensitivity, 41 full transporters and 13 half transporters were identified from P. infestans and their mRNA levels compared in strains exhibiting higher or lower sensitivities to fungicides. No correlation was observed between the expression of any ABC transporter and fungicide sensitivity. Other genes, or variation in the activities of the transporters, may therefore explain the differences between strains. Five ABC transporters were induced by several fungicides in strains with both higher and lower sensitivities to fungicides, which probably reflects the existence of a network for protecting against natural and artificial toxins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard S Judelson
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Reis A, Ribeiro FHS, Maffia LA, Mizubuti ESG. Sensitivity of Brazilian Isolates of Phytophthora infestans to Commonly Used Fungicides in Tomato and Potato Crops. PLANT DISEASE 2005; 89:1279-1284. [PMID: 30791305 DOI: 10.1094/pd-89-1279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Isolates of the US-1 and BR-1 clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans, collected from tomato and potato fields of two main producing regions of Brazil (south and southeast), were tested for sensitivity to the systemic fungicide metalaxyl, plus the three protectant fungicides mancozeb, chlorothalonil, and cymoxanil. For metalaxyl, one agar test and two leaf-disc tests were carried out. For all tests, metalaxyl insensitive (I), intermediately insensitive (II), and sensitive (S) isolates were detected. There was no association among metalaxyl sensitivity and region, lineage, or host. In the agar test, 35.0% of 210 isolates were classified as I, 36.0% as II, and 29.0% as S. US-1 isolates were classified as 36.1% I, 30.6% II, and 33.3% S. BR-1 isolates were 33.3% I, 23.8% II, and 42.9% S. In leaf-disc test 1 (240 isolates tested), 24.3% were classified as I, 35.0% as II, and 40.7% as S. Isolates of US-1 were 21.0% I, 39.8% II, and 39.2% S, whereas BR-1 isolates were 36.0% I, 20.0% II, and 44.0% S. In leaf-disc test 2 (96 isolates tested), which was based on an effective dose for 50% sporulation inhibition (ED50), most isolates were either I (44.8%) or II (51.0%), and only three (4.2%) were S. The US-1 isolates were 46.0% I, 51.0% II, and 3.0% S. Isolates of the BR-1 lineage were 45.0% I, 52.0% II, and 3.0% S. For mancozeb, the ED50 for 53 of 59 isolates was below 1.0 μg/ml. No isolate grew on medium amended with more than 100 μg of chlorothalonil/ml and the ED50 for 38 of 50 isolates was below 1.0 μg/ml. For cymoxanil, the ED50 for all 47 isolates tested was below 1 μg/ml. There is no evidence of resistance of resistance of P. infestans to protectant fungicides commonly used in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailton Reis
- Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa-MG, Brazil
| | - Fabiana H S Ribeiro
- Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa-MG, Brazil
| | - Luiz A Maffia
- Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa-MG, Brazil
| | - Eduardo S G Mizubuti
- Departamento de Fitopatologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-000, Viçosa-MG, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Peters RD, Clark RJ, Coffin AD, Sturz AV, Lambert DH, Miller JS. Limited Genetic Diversity in North American Isolates of Phytophthora erythroseptica Pathogenic to Potato Based on RAPD Analysis. PLANT DISEASE 2005; 89:380-384. [PMID: 30795453 DOI: 10.1094/pd-89-0380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Pink rot of potato (Solanum tuberosum), caused by Phytophthora erythroseptica, is found wherever potatoes are grown, and in the last decade, it has reemerged as an economically important disease in Canada and the United States. A selection of isolates of P. erythroseptica from major potato-growing regions in North America, namely Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick, Canada, and Maine and Idaho, U.S.A., was assessed for genetic diversity with randomly chosen decanucleotide primers which were used to amplify regions of DNA to reveal polymorphisms among templates (random amplified polymorphic DNA [RAPD]). The isolates varied in their geographic origin as well as in their sensitivity to mefenoxam, as determined by an in vitro assay. In three separate RAPD screens (I, II, and III) with 23 isolates of P. erythroseptica chosen from a larger collection, 1,410, 369, and 316 robust, scorable bands were amplified, respectively. However, among the bands amplified in screens I, II, and III, only 3, 1, and 3 bands, respectively, were polymorphic. When three primers yielding polymorphisms were used to screen 106 isolates from Prince Edward Island and New Brunswick, or a representative collection of 32 isolates from Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, Maine, and Idaho, no major variation was discovered. RAPD markers were not correlated with geographic origin or mefenoxam sensitivity of the isolates. From an evolutionary standpoint, the absence of genetic diversity among the isolates of P. erythroseptica we examined may be attributable to the relatively recent introduction of a small founding population of the pathogen in North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rick D Peters
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Crops and Livestock Research Centre, 440 University Ave., Charlottetown, PEI C1A 4N6 Canada
| | - Rod J Clark
- PEI Dept. of Agriculture and Forestry, Plant Health Research & Diagnostics, P.O. Box 1600, Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N3 Canada
| | - Albert D Coffin
- PEI Dept. of Agriculture and Forestry, Plant Health Research & Diagnostics, P.O. Box 1600, Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N3 Canada
| | - Antony V Sturz
- PEI Dept. of Agriculture and Forestry, Plant Health Research & Diagnostics, P.O. Box 1600, Charlottetown, PEI C1A 7N3 Canada
| | - David H Lambert
- Dept. of Applied Ecology and Environmental Science, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Room 9, Orono, ME 04469-5722 U.S.A
| | - Jeff S Miller
- University of Idaho, Dept. of Plant, Soil and Entomological Sciences, P.O. Box 870, Aberdeen, ID 83210-0870 U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van der Lee T, Testa A, Robold A, van 't Klooster J, Govers F. High-density genetic linkage maps of Phytophthora infestans reveal trisomic progeny and chromosomal rearrangements. Genetics 2005; 167:1643-61. [PMID: 15342505 PMCID: PMC1470988 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.029652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Detailed analysis of the inheritance of molecular markers was performed in the oomycete plant pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Linkage analysis in the sexual progeny of two Dutch field isolates (cross 71) resulted in a high-density map containing 508 markers on 13 major and 10 minor linkage groups. The map showed strong clustering of markers, particularly of markers originating from one parent, and dissimilarity between the parental isolates on linkage group III in the vicinity of the mating-type locus, indicating a chromosomal translocation. A second genetic map, constructed by linkage analysis in sexual progeny of two Mexican isolates (cross 68), contained 363 markers and is thus less dense than the cross 71 map. For some linkage groups the two independent linkage maps could be aligned, but sometimes markers appeared to be in a different order, or not linked at all, indicating chromosomal rearrangements between genotypes. Graphical genotyping showed that some progeny contained three copies of a homologous linkage group. This trisomy was found for several linkage groups in both crosses. Together, these analyses suggest a genome with a high degree of flexibility, which may have implications for evolution of new races and resistance development to crop protection agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theo van der Lee
- Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen University, and Graduate School of Experimental Plant Sciences, 6709 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Samen FMAE, Secor GA, Gudmestad NC. Variability in Virulence Among Asexual Progenies of Phytophthora infestans. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2003; 93:293-304. [PMID: 18944339 DOI: 10.1094/phyto.2003.93.3.293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT One hundred two single zoospore isolates of Phytophthora infestans, derived asexually from four parental isolates of US-8 genotype and one isolate of US-1 genotype, were characterized for their virulence phenotypes to determine changes in virulence during asexual reproduction. Potato differentials, each containing a major gene for resistance to P. infestans (R1 to R11), were used to characterize the virulence patterns. Isolates were also characterized for mating type, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (Gpi) banding pattern, and DNA fingerprints using probe RG57 to determine any genotypic changes in the single zoospore isolates. A subset of these single zoospore isolates was tested for response to mefenoxam to determine any shifts in sensitivity. Results showed that single zoospore isolates derived from parent PI-1 (US-8, 11 isolates) were identical to their parental virulence. Isolates derived from parent PI-191 (US-8, 29 isolates) showed some differences in virulence, mainly toward R8 and R9. Isolates derived from parent PI-126 (US-8, 14 isolates) demonstrated a higher level of virulence diversity. Isolates derived from parents PI-52 (US-1, 28 isolates) and PI-105 (US-8, 20 isolates) showed the highest level of virulence variability among the single zoospore isolates. Mating type, Gpi banding pattern, and DNA fingerprints for the single zoospore isolates were, in most cases, identical to the parental isolates. Single zoospore isolates showed different levels of sensitivity to mefenoxam. Virulence and other genetic changes during asexual reproduction are likely to play a major role in changing the race structure of P. infestans populations. This continuous change in the race structure is a serious problem and now poses a new challenge for utilization of race-specific resistance to manage late blight of potato.
Collapse
|
25
|
Shattock RC. Phytophthora infestans: populations, pathogenicity and phenylamides. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE 2002; 58:944-950. [PMID: 12233186 DOI: 10.1002/ps.527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Isolates of Phytophthora infestans (Mont) de Bary (the potato and tomato late blight pathogen) resistant to phenylamides appeared in Europe and North America in the late 1970s and early 1990s respectively. Concurrent, but coincidentally, with both these events there were radical structural shifts in the pathogen populations as immigrant genotypes from Mexico displaced the indigenous populations. Both A1 and A2 mating type isolates are now present in blighted crops, permitting alternative inoculum via germinating sexually produced oospores to influence dynamics of late blight populations. Studies of inheritance of ploidy, host-specific pathogenicity, mating type and resistance to antibiotics and phenylamide fungicides have provided insight into mechanisms of variation in this potent pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard C Shattock
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bakonyi J, Láday M, Érsek T. Characterization of parental traits in somatic fusion progeny of Phytophthora infestans. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2002. [DOI: 10.1556/aphyt.37.2002.1-3.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
27
|
Parra G, Ristaino JB. Resistance to Mefenoxam and Metalaxyl Among Field Isolates of Phytophthora capsici Causing Phytophthora Blight of Bell Pepper. PLANT DISEASE 2001; 85:1069-1075. [PMID: 30823278 DOI: 10.1094/pdis.2001.85.10.1069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Incidence of Phytophthora blight in bell pepper fields that were sprayed for the first time with Ridomil Gold (mefenoxam) according to labeled recommendations was higher in North Carolina in 1997 than in previous years. Mefenoxam is the more active enantiomer contained in the racemic fungicide metalaxyl. A total of 150 isolates were obtained from 17 fields at eight grower locations. Among isolates from all locations, 30% were classified as sensitive, 10% as intermediate, and 59% were resistant to mefenoxam. Mefenoxam-resistant isolates were found in 82% of the fields sampled (14 of 17 fields). The proportion of resistant isolates in individual (fields ranged from 28 to 100%. The mean effective concentration (EC50) values for mefenoxam-sensitive isolates was 0.568 μg ml-1 (ranging from 0.12 to 1.1 μg ml-1), whereas the mean EC50 value for mefenoxam-resistant isolates was 366.5 μg ml-1 (ranging from 3 to 863 μg ml-1). The mean EC50 value for metalaxyl-sensitive isolates was 0.27 μg ml-1 (ranging from 0.00002 to 1.3 μg ml-1) and for metalaxyl-resistant isolates was 470.34 μg ml-1 (ranging from 10 to 966 μg ml-1). The greatest proportion of resistant isolates came from fields where mefenoxam was used alone rather than in combination with other fungicides. Both mating types were found among resistant isolates, suggesting that these isolates may persist in soil in subsequent years. Field isolates of Phytophthora capsici resistant to mefenoxam on pepper have not been reported previously and now pose new challenges for management of this important disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Parra
- Department of Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mayton H, Smart CD, Moravec BC, Mizubuti ESG, Muldoon AE, Fry WE. Oospore Survival and Pathogenicity of Single Oospore Recombinant Progeny from a Cross Involving US-17 and US-8 Genotypes of Phytophthora infestans. PLANT DISEASE 2000; 84:1190-1196. [PMID: 30832166 DOI: 10.1094/pdis.2000.84.11.1190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Oospores of Phytophthora infestans produced in vitro and in planta, from a cross between US-17 and US-8 genotypes, were exposed to a variety of environments and their survival was assessed. Additionally, the pathogenic characteristics of some resultant progeny isolates were assessed. Viability of oospores as measured by plasmolysis declined slightly over a period of 18 months whether they were stored in water at 4°C, in soil at 18°C, or in soil under natural field conditions. In comparison, viability as measured by germination was lower overall but appeared to increase after storage in soil. Oospores produced in planta were buried in the field in the fall of 1998, and were capable of infecting both tomato and potato leaflets when recovered in May 1999. Single oospore progeny (n = 53) from the in vitro cross were analyzed individually for genetic and pathogenicity characteristics. All 53 progeny tested for restriction fragment length polymorphisms with probe RG57 were hybrids. All but one progeny produced sporulating lesions on detached potato or tomato leaflets in growth chamber tests, but most lesions were smaller and developed more slowly than those produced by either parental isolate. In a further test of pathogenicity, under field conditions, none of a subset of 10 A2 progeny was capable of initiating a detectable epidemic in small plots of either potatoes or tomatoes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Mayton
- Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - C D Smart
- Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - B C Moravec
- Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - E S G Mizubuti
- Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - A E Muldoon
- Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| | - W E Fry
- Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
| |
Collapse
|