A kinetic model identifies phosphorylated estrogen receptor-α (ERα) as a critical regulator of ERα dynamics in breast cancer

Vitamin D and Systems Biology

The biological actions of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) have been investigated intensively for over 100 years and has led to the identification of significant insights into the repertoire of its biological actions. These were initially established to be centered on the regulation of calcium transport in the colon and deposition in bone. Beyond these well-known calcemic roles, other roles have emerged in the regulation of cell differentiation processes and have an impact on metabolism. The purpose of the current review is to consider where applying systems biology (SB) approaches may begin to generate a more precise understanding of where the VDR is, and is not, biologically impactful. Two SB approaches have been developed and begun to reveal insight into VDR biological functions. In a top-down SB approach genome-wide scale data are statistically analyzed, and from which a role for the VDR emerges in terms of being a hub in a biological network. Such approaches have confirmed significant roles, for example, in myeloid differentiation and the control of inflammation and innate immunity. In a bottom-up SB approach, current biological understanding is built into a kinetic model which is then applied to existing biological data to explain the function and identify unknown behavior. To date, this has not been applied to the VDR, but has to the related ERα and identified previously unknown mechanisms of control. One arena where applying top-down and bottom-up SB approaches may be informative is in the setting of prostate cancer health disparities.

The high methylation level of a novel 151-bp CpG island in the ESR1 gene promoter is associated with a poor breast cancer prognosis

BACKGROUND

The ESR1 gene suffers methylation changes in many types of cancers, including breast cancer (BC), the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women that is also present in men. Methylation at promoter A of ESR1 is the worse prognosis in terms of overall survival; thus, the early detection, prognostic, and prediction of therapy involve some methylation biomarkers.

METHODS

Therefore, our study aimed to examine the methylation levels at the ESR1 gene in samples from Mexican BC patients and its possible association with menopausal status.

RESULTS

We identified a novel 151-bp CpG island in the promoter A of the ESR1 gene. Interestingly, methylation levels at this CpG island in positive ERα tumors were approximately 50% less than negative ERα or control samples. Furthermore, methylation levels at ESR1 were associated with menopausal status. In postmenopausal patients, the methylation levels were 1.5-fold higher than in premenopausal patients. Finally, according to tumor malignancy, triple-negative cancer subtypes had higher ESR1 methylation levels than luminal/HER2+ or luminal A subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that methylation at this novel CpG island might be a promising prognosis marker.

RSK2 Maintains Adult Estrogen Homeostasis by Inhibiting ERK1/2-Mediated Degradation of Estrogen Receptor Alpha

In response to estrogens, estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), a critical regulator of homeostasis, is degraded through the 26S proteasome. However, despite the continued presence of estrogen before menopause, ERα protein levels are maintained. We discovered that ERK1/2-RSK2 activity oscillates during the estrous cycle. In response to high estrogen levels, ERK1/2 is activated and phosphorylates ERα to drive ERα degradation and estrogen-responsive gene expression. Reduction of estrogen levels results in ERK1/2 deactivation. RSK2 maintains redox homeostasis, which prevents sustained ERK1/2 activation. In juveniles, ERK1/2-RSK2 activity is not required. Mammary gland regeneration demonstrates that ERK1/2-RSK2 regulation of ERα is intrinsic to the epithelium. Reduced RSK2 and enrichment in an estrogen-regulated gene signature occur in individuals taking oral contraceptives. RSK2 loss enhances DNA damage, which may account for the elevated breast cancer risk with the use of exogenous estrogens. These findings implicate RSK2 as a critical component for the preservation of estrogen homeostasis.

Ludwik et al. find that ERK1/2-RSK2 activity oscillates with each reproductive cycle. The estrogen surge activates ERK1/2, which phosphorylates estrogen receptor alpha to drive estrogen responsiveness. Active RSK2 acts as a brake on the estrogen response by maintaining redox homeostasis. Oral contraceptive use correlates with disruption of ERK1/2-RSK2 regulation.

DNA methylation and expression of estrogen receptor alpha in fathead minnows exposed to 17α-ethynylestradiol

The gene expression response thought to underlie the negative apical effects resulting from estrogen exposure have been thoroughly described in fish. Although epigenetics are believed to play a critical role translating environmental exposures into the development of adverse apical effects, they remain poorly characterized in fish species. This study investigated alterations of DNA methylation of estrogen receptor alpha (esr1) in brain and liver tissues from 8 to 10 month old male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) after a 2d exposure to either 2.5 ng/L or 10 ng/L 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2). Changes in the patterns of methylation were evaluated using targeted deep sequencing of bisulfite treated DNA in the 5' region of esr1. Methylation and gene expression were assessed at 2d of exposure and after a 7 and 14d depuration period. After 2d EE2 exposure, males exhibited significant demethylation in the 5' upstream region of esr1 in liver tissue, which was inversely correlated to gene expression. This methylation pattern reflected what was seen in females. No gene body methylation (GBM) was observed for liver of exposed males. Differential methylation was observed for a single upstream CpG site in the liver after the 14d depuration. A less pronounced methylation response was observed in the upstream region in brain tissue, however, several CpGs were necessarily excluded from the analysis. In contrast to the liver, a significant GBM response was observed across the entire gene body, which was sustained until at least 7d post-exposure. No differential expression was observed in the brain, limiting functional interpretation of methylation changes. The identification of EE2-dependent changes in methylation levels strongly suggests the importance of epigenetic mechanisms as a mediator of the organismal response to environmental exposures and the need for further characterization of the epigenome. Further, differential methylation following depuration indicates estrogenic effects persist well after the active exposure, which has implications for the risk posed by repeated exposures..

Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors Governing the Transcriptional Regulation of ESR1

Transcriptional regulation of ESR1, the gene that encodes for estrogen receptor α (ER), is critical for regulating the downstream effects of the estrogen signaling pathway in breast cancer such as cell growth. ESR1 is a large and complex gene that is regulated by multiple regulatory elements, which has complicated our understanding of how ESR1 expression is controlled in the context of breast cancer. Early studies characterized the genomic structure of ESR1 with subsequent studies focused on identifying intrinsic (chromatin environment, transcription factors, signaling pathways) and extrinsic (tumor microenvironment, secreted factors) mechanisms that impact ESR1 gene expression. Currently, the introduction of genomic sequencing platforms and additional genome-wide technologies has provided additional insight on how chromatin structures may coordinate with these intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms to regulate ESR1 expression. Understanding these interactions will allow us to have a clearer understanding of how ESR1 expression is regulated and eventually provide clues on how to influence its regulation with potential treatments. In this review, we highlight key studies concerning the genomic structure of ESR1, mechanisms that affect the dynamics of ESR1 expression, and considerations towards affecting ESR1 expression and hormone responsiveness in breast cancer.

Estrogen receptor α regulates the expression of syndecan-1 in human breast carcinoma cells

Breast cancer (BC) is the primary cause of cancer-related mortality among women. Patients who express the estrogen receptor (ER), which mediates the tumorigenic effects of estrogens, respond to antihormonal therapy. Loss of ER expression or acquired resistance to E2 is associated with aggressive malignant phenotypes, which lead to relapse. These BC subtypes overexpress syndecan-1 (SDC1), a transmembrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan that mediates angiogenesis as well as the proliferation and invasiveness of cancer cells. We showed here that the activation of ER-alpha (ERα) by estrogens induces downregulation of SDC1 expression in ER(+) MCF7 cells but not in T47D cells. Loss of ERα expression, induced by RNA interference or a selective ER downregulator, led to subsequent SDC1 overexpression. E2-dependent downregulation of SDC1 expression required de novo protein synthesis and was antagonized by treatment with BAY 11-7085, an irreversible inhibitor of IκBα phosphorylation, which inhibits the activation of NFκB. Downregulation of SDC1 expression required ERα and activation of IKK, but was independent to downstream transcriptional regulators of NFκB. BAY 11-7085 prevented E2-mediated phosphorylation of ERα on Ser118, increasing its proteasomal degradation, suggesting that IKK stabilized E2-activated ERα, leading to subsequent downregulation of SDC1 expression. Our results showed that sustained ER signaling inhibits SDC1 expression. Such antagonism elucidates the inverse correlation between SDC1 and ER expression in ER(+) BC as well as the overexpression of SDC1 in hormone receptor-negative BC subtypes with the most aggressive phenotypes. These results identify SDC1 as an attractive therapeutic target for BC as well as for other endocrine-associated cancers.

The estrogen receptor-alpha S118P variant does not affect breast cancer incidence or response to endocrine therapies

PURPOSE

Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) is a therapeutic target of ER-positive (ER+) breast cancers. Although ER signaling is complex, many mediators of this pathway have been identified. Specifically, phosphorylation of ER at serine 118 affects responses to estrogen and therapeutic ligands and has been correlated with clinical outcomes in ER+ breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that a newly described germline variant (S118P) at this residue would drive cellular changes consistent with breast cancer development and/or hormone resistance.

METHODS

Isogenic human breast epithelial cell line models harboring ER S118P were developed via genome editing and characterized to determine the functional effects of this variant. We also examined the frequency of ER S118P in a case-control study (N = 536) of women with and without breast cancer with a familial risk.

RESULTS

In heterozygous knock-in models, the S118P variant demonstrated no significant change in proliferation, migration, MAP Kinase pathway signaling, or response to the endocrine therapies tamoxifen and fulvestrant. Further, there was no difference in the prevalence of S118P between women with and without cancer relative to population registry databases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the ER S118P variant does not affect risk for breast cancer or hormone therapy resistance. Germline screening and modification of treatments for patients harboring this variant are likely not warranted.

Hypoxia induced phosphorylation of estrogen receptor at serine 118 in the absence of ligand

The estrogen receptor (ER) plays an important role in breast cancer development and progression. Hypoxia modulates the level of ERα expression and induces ligand-independent transcriptional activation of ERα, which is closely related with the biology of breast carcinomas. Since phosphorylation itself affects the transcriptional activity and stabilization of ERα, we examined changes in ERα phosphorylation under hypoxic conditions. Hypoxia induced phosphorylation of ERα at serine residue 118 (S118) in the absence of estrogen through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK1/2 pathway. Cell proliferation was significantly decreased under normoxia or hypoxia when ERα harboring the S118A mutation was overexpressed. Our previous studies showed that ER degradation is the most prominent phenomenon under hypoxia. E2-induced ER protein downregulation is dependent on phosphorylation of S118. However, hypoxia-induced ERα degradation did not involve S118 phosphorylation. Our study implies the existence of a differential mechanism between E2 and hypoxia-mediated ERα protein degradation. Understanding the mechanistic behavior of ER under hypoxia will likely facilitate understanding of endocrine therapy resistance and development of treatment strategies for breast cancer.