Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with infusional 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (de Gramont regimen) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter phase II study

Elderly Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Tolerability and Activity of Chemotherapy

Aims and Background

Colorectal cancer is the most common gastrointestinal tumor in Western countries and is increasing in elderly patients. In recent years, new treatments based on the use of 5-fluorouracil associated with oxaliplatin or CPT-11 have shown promising activity. The aim of the present study was to analyze the tolerability and activity of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin or CPT-11 in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients aged 70 years or older with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 in bolus and 600 mg/m2 in a 22-hr continuous infusion on days 1-2) plus folinic acid (100 mg/m2) associated to oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on day 1, FOLFOX regimen) or CPT-11 (180 mg/m2 on day 1, FOLFIRI regimen), every 14 days.

Results

Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 76 years (range, 70-82) were treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. We observed a partial response in 8/29 (27.6%), stable disease in 11/29 (37.9%) and progressive disease in 10/29 (34.5%). Median survival was 21 months; 1-year survival probability was 89.8%. Grade III leukopenia was observed in 2/29 (7%) patients and grade III diarrhea in 1/29 patients. No other grade III-IV toxicity was observed.

Conclusions

FOLFOX and FOLFIRI appear to be active and well tolerated regimens for elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Irinotecan- and 5-fluorouracil-induced intestinal mucositis: insights into pathogenesis and therapeutic perspectives

PURPOSE

Intestinal mucositis and diarrhea are common manifestations of anticancer regimens that include irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and other cytotoxic drugs. These side effects negatively impact therapeutic outcomes and delay subsequent cycles of chemotherapy, resulting in dose reductions and treatment discontinuation. Here, we aimed to review the experimental evidence regarding possible new targets for the management of irinotecan- and 5-FU-related intestinal mucositis.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. No publication time limit was set for article inclusion.

RESULTS

Here, we found that clinical management of intestinal mucositis and diarrhea is somewhat ineffective at reducing symptoms, possibly due to a lack of specific targets for modulation. We observed that IL-1β contributes to the apoptosis of enterocytes in mucositis induced by 5-FU. However, 5-FU-related mucositis is far less thoroughly investigated with regard to specific molecular targets when compared to irinotecan-related disease. Several studies have proposed that a correlation exists between the intestinal microbiota, the enterohepatic recirculation of active metabolites of irinotecan, and the establishment of mucositis. However, as reviewed here, this association seems to be controversial. In addition, the pathogenesis of irinotecan-induced mucositis appears to be orchestrated by interleukin-1/Toll-like receptor family members, leading to epithelial cell apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-1β, IL-18, and IL-33 and the receptors IL-1R, IL-18R, ST2, and TLR-2 are potential therapeutic targets that can be modulated to minimize anticancer agent-associated toxicity, optimize cancer treatment dosing, and improve clinical outcomes. In this context, the pathogenesis of mucositis caused by other anticancer agents should be further investigated.

Elective palliative resection of incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: who really benefits from it?

PURPOSE

Despite the encouraging results of chemotherapy in patients affected by incurable colorectal cancer (CRC), surgical resection of a primitive tumor is still a common approach worldwide. The identification of prognostic factors related to short survival (<6 months) may allow excluding from resective surgery those who may not benefit from it.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 15 variables in a population of 71 patients undergoing nonemergency palliative primary resections of incurable CRC, including patients' demographics and clinical/histopathological characteristics of the tumor.

RESULTS

No variables were related to perioperative mortality (8.5% overall). A multivariate analysis revealed that older age (≥80 years) and metastasis to more than 25% of the lymph nodes were associated with survival (4 and 6 months, respectively). Mucoid adenocarcinoma therefore tends to be associated with the prognosis (P = 0.070).

CONCLUSIONS

An elderly age tends to be a contraindication to an elective primary tumor resection in patients affected by incurable CRC. Massive lymph node involvement and mucoid adenocarcinoma should also be considered before planning major colonic surgery.

Palliative resection of colorectal cancer: does it prolong survival?

BACKGROUND

It is still a matter of debate as to whether resective surgery of the primary tumor may prolong the survival of patients affected by incurable colorectal cancer (CRC). The main goal of this retrospective study, carried out on patients not undergoing any therapy other than surgery, was to quantify the benefit of primary tumor removal in patients with differently presenting incurable CRC.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty consecutive patients were operated on for incurable CRC (83 undergoing resective and 47 non-resective procedures). With the purpose of comparing homogenous populations and of identifying patients who may benefit from primary tumor resection, the patients were classified according to classes of disease, based on the "metastatic pattern" and the "resectability of primary tumor."

RESULTS

In patients with "resectable" primary tumors, resective procedures are associated with longer median survival than after non-resective ones (9 months vs 3). Only patients with distant spread without neoplastic ascites/carcinosis benefit from primary tumor removal (median survival: 9 months vs 3). Morbidity and mortality of resective procedures is not significantly different from that of non-resective surgery, either in the population studied or in any of the groups considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative resection of primary CRC should be pursued in patients with unresectable distant metastasis (without carcinomatosis), and, intraoperatively, whenever the primary tumor is technically resectable.

Sequential administration of 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11) at relapse versus CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal carcinoma. A phase III randomized study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the differences in the sequence of administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) followed by irinotecan (CPT-11), or CPT-11 followed by 5-FU/LV in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with ACC were allocated to the following treatment groups: group A, a bolus of 20 mg/m(2) LV and 425 mg/m(2) 5-FU for 5 days until progression/relapse, and upon progression treatment with weekly CPT-11 (100 mg/m(2)), and group B, CPT-11 followed at progression/relapse by 5-FU/LV at the same doses and schedules as in group A.

RESULTS

120 patients were randomized to receive one of the two treatment sequences and their pretreatment characteristics were equally balanced between treatment arms. No statistically significant difference was found in the objective response rate to CPT-11 (p = 0.45); partial response (PR) was 23.3% for group A patients and 33.3% for group B. Following documented progression and second line treatment there was a significant difference between the response rate in group A (23.3%) and group B where no patients were found to respond to second-line treatment with 5-FU/LV (p = 0.024). The median overall survival was 42.0 weeks (range, 36.6-47.4 weeks) for group A and 32.0 weeks (range, 28.2-35.8 weeks) for group B. The median time to progression for patients in group A following first-line 5-FU/LV was 18 weeks (range, 10-36 weeks) and 12 weeks (range, 10-16 weeks) for group B following first-line CPT-11 (p = 0.0005). Toxicity, according to WHO, was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Treating patients with CPT-11 upon progression to 5-FU/LV treatment seems to be superior to the opposite sequence. We used these treatments as sequential monotherapies (at progression/relapse), and the best results are gained when 5-FU/LV is followed by CPT-11 at disease progression or relapse.

Weekly irinotecan plus UFT and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced colorectal cancer

We evaluated the antitumoral efficacy and safety of CPT-11 125 mg/m2 (weekly 90 min i.v. infusion; days 1, 8 and 15) combined with UFT (oral combination of tegafur and uracil) 200 mg/m2/day plus leucovorin (LV) 45 mg/m2/day (both divided into three separate oral doses every 8 h, days 1-21) every 4 weeks as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Fifty-three patients > or =18 years old with histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced CRC and bidimensionally measurable disease were enrolled. Three patients (6%) showed CR and 8 patients (15%) showed PR (ORR = 21% (95% CI, 10-32). Stable disease was reported in 19 patients (36%) [tumor control rate = 57% (95% CI, 43-70)]. The median time to progression and overall survival were 7.9 and 18.2 months, respectively (1-year rate = 74%; 2-years rate = 26%). CPT-11/UFT/LV treatment was well tolerated: the most reported grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (11% of patients) and delayed diarrhea (28% of patients). No significant differences in response rate, survival or toxicity were found between younger (< or =65 years) and older patients (> 65 years). Weekly CPT-11 plus UFT/LV was found effective and safe as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic CRC. The addition of CPT-11 to UFT/LV doubled the response rate compared to the results previously reported with UFT/LV, while myelosuppression remained low.

Chemotherapy- and Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: Review of Preventive Strategies and Treatment

Oral mucositis is a frequently encountered and potentially severe complication associated with administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Although many pharmacologic interventions have been used for the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis, there is not one universally accepted strategy for its management. Most preventive and treatment strategies are based on limited, often anecdotal, clinical data. Basic oral hygiene and comprehensive patient education are important components of care for any patient with cancer at risk for development of oral mucositis. Nonpharmacologic approaches for the prevention of oral mucositis include oral cryotherapy for patients receiving chemotherapy with bolus 5-fluorouracil, and low-level laser therapy for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Chlorhexidine, amifostine, hematologic growth factors, pentoxifylline, glutamine, and several other agents have all been investigated for prevention of oral mucositis. Results have been conflicting, inconclusive, or of limited benefit. Treatment of established mucositis remains a challenge and focuses on a palliative management approach. Topical anesthetics, mixtures (also called cocktails), and mucosal coating agents have been used despite the lack of experimental evidence supporting their efficacy. Investigational agents are targeting the specific mechanisms of mucosal injury; among the most promising of these is recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor.

How aggressive should we be in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer?

PURPOSE

The prognosis for metastatic colorectal cancer is grave. Whether to perform surgical resection or palliative treatment remains controversial for this advanced disease. In this retrospective study, we collected data from patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer to identify prognostic factors for predicting selection criteria for surgical treatment in patients with metastatic disease.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients treated from 1992 to 1999 from the Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center Tumor Registry. Seventy-four patients were identified as having Stage IV disease at the time of diagnosis. Data concerning the patients' demographics, laboratory results, operative procedure, mortality, morbidity, and survival were collected. Independent variables and survival time were analyzed by the independent t-test method. The difference was considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Overall survival time for the patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer was 16.1 months. Survival in the curative resection group was significantly longer than that in the noncurative group (31.9 vs. 12.7; P < 0.016). The operative mortality and morbidity rates were 5.6 percent (4 of 71) and 21.1 percent (15 of 71), respectively. The two most common complications were leakage at the site of anastomosis and urinary tract infection. Based on these results, we conclude that patients older than 65 years, with metastases at multiple sites, intestinal obstruction, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level > or =500 ng/ml, lactate dehydrogenase > or =350 units/liter, hemoglobin <10 mg/dl, or hepatic parenchymal replacement by tumor >25 percent have poor prognosis for surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Whether to perform primary tumor resection in patients with asymptomatic Stage IV colorectal cancer remains controversial; however, the more aggressively we perform radical resection and metastasectomy to selected patients, the more survival benefits the patients obtain.

Perioperative complications in patients undergoing major liver resection with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Systemic chemotherapy is used increasingly prior to resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Previous reports have indicated an increased risk of perioperative complications associated with the use of systemic chemotherapy prior to resection. The purpose of this study was to investigate perioperative complications in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with or without CPT-11 within 6 months of major liver resection. A retrospective review of 108 patients undergoing major liver resection for colorectal metastases with curative intent from 1997 to 2002 was performed. Patient and tumor characteristics, perioperative parameters, and morbidity and mortality were measured. Forty-seven patients (44%) received no chemotherapy, 27 patients (25%) received systemic 5-FU/LV, and 34 (31%) received systemic 5-FU/LV/CPT-11. A significantly higher number of patients in the group treated with preoperative 5-FU/LV plus CPT-11 had multiple tumors. Patients in this group also tended to have smaller tumors, fewer complications, and a higher R0 margin resection rate, but these findings were not statistically significant. Median blood loss and length of hospital stay were also not significantly different. There were no perioperative deaths. We conclude that the use of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy and CPT-11 prior to major liver resection is not associated with increased morbidity or mortality. It may therefore provide a better therapeutic option, particularly in patients with multiple colorectal metastases.