The effect of propofol on human gastric and colonic muscle contractions. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1246-1249. [PMID: 10553844 DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199911000-00031]

Comparison of the effects of intravenous propofol and inhalational desflurane on the quality of early recovery after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective, randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

We compared early recovery outcomes between living kidney donors who received total intravenous (IV) propofol versus inhalational desflurane during hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy.

DESIGN

A single-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Study participants were enrolled between October 2019 and February 2020. A total of 80 living donors were randomly assigned to an intravenous propofol group (n=40) or a desflurane group (n=40).

INTERVENTION

Propofol group received intravenous propofol and desflurane group received desflurane, as a maintenance anaesthetic.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The quality of postoperative functional recovery was primarily assessed using the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40K) questionnaire on postoperative day 1. Secondarily, ambulation, pain score, rescue analgesics, complications and total hospital stay were assessed postoperatively.

RESULTS

Our study population included 35 males and 45 females. The mean age was 46±13 years. The global QoR-40K score (161 (154-173) vs 152 (136-161) points, respectively, p=0.001) and all five subdimension scores (physical comfort, 49 (45-53) vs 45 (42-48) points, respectively, p=0.003; emotional state, 39 (37-41) vs 37 (33-41) points, respectively, p=0.005; psychological support, 30 (26-34) vs 28 (26-32) points, respectively, p=0.04; physical independence, 16 (11-18) vs 12 (8-14) points, respectively, p=0.004; and pain, 31 (28-33) vs 29 (25-31) points, respectively, p=0.021) were significantly higher in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group. The early ambulation success rate and numbers of early and total steps were higher, but the incidence of nausea/vomiting was lower, in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group. The total hospital stay after surgery was shorter in the intravenous propofol group than the desflurane group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous propofol may enhance the quality of postoperative recovery in comparison to desflurane in living kidney donors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

KCT0004365.

Combination of propofol and dezocine to improve safety and efficacy of anesthesia for gastroscopy and colonoscopy in adults: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Gastroscopy and colonoscopy are important and common endoscopic methods for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal and colorectal diseases. However, endoscopy is usually associated with adverse reactions such as nervousness, nausea, vomiting, choking cough, and pain. Severe discomfort, such as vomiting, coughing, or body movement, may lead to aggravation of a pre-existing condition or even interruption of examination or treatment, especially in some critically ill patients with physiological dysfunction (e.g., cardiovascular or respiratory disease). The optimal methods for inducing analgesia and sedation in endoscopy are areas of ongoing debate; nevertheless, determining an appropriate regimen of sedation and analgesia is important.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of propofol combined with dezocine, sufentanil, or fentanyl in painless gastroscopy and colonoscopy.

METHODS

Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups for anesthesia: intravenous dezocine, sufentanil, fentanyl, or saline. Propofol was administered intravenously for induction and maintenance of anesthesia.

RESULTS

The dosage of propofol in the dezocine group was significantly lower than those in other groups (P < 0.01). Bispectral index and Steward score (0-6 points, an unresponsive, immobile patient whose airway requires maintenance to a fully recovered patient) after eye opening in the dezocine group were significantly higher than those in other groups (P < 0.01). Awakening time and postoperative pain score (0-10 points, no pain to unbearable pain) in the dezocine group were significantly lower than those in other groups (P < 0.01). Mean arterial pressure and pulse oxygen saturation in the dezocine group were significantly more stable at various time points (before dosing, disappearance of eyelash reflex, and wakeup) than those in other groups (P < 0.01). The rates of hypopnea, jaw thrust, body movements, and usage of vasoactive drugs in the dezocine group were significantly lower than those in other groups (P < 0.01). Additionally, the rates of reflex coughing, nausea, and vomiting were not statistically different between the four groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of propofol and dezocine can decrease propofol dosage, reduce the risk for the development of inhibitory effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, increase analgesic effect, decrease body movement, shorten awakening time, and improve awakening quality.

General versus spinal anesthesia with different forms of sedation in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: Results of a prospective, randomized study

AIM

To assess the impact of spinal anesthesia (SpA) combined with three different forms of conscious sedation on intraoperative and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for organ confined prostate cancer (pCa).

METHODS

A total of 121 consecutive patients with pCa undergoing RRP were randomized into four groups. They were randomized as follows: group 1 (general anesthesia: 34 patients), group 2 (lumbar 2 to lumbar 3 interspace SpA with diazepam as sedative agent: 28), group 3 (SpA with propofol: 30), and group 4 (SpA with midazolam: 29). Intraoperative and perioperative parameters were collected.

RESULTS

The present study showed that muscle relaxation throughout RRP was not different in the four groups; bleeding was significantly (P = 0.04) lower with SpA, regardless of the form of sedation. Group 3 patients reported the best postoperative oxygen saturation percentage by pulse oximetry and sedation score (P = 0.02; d.f. = 3 and P < 0.0001; d.f. = 3, respectively), the shortest waiting time in the postoperative holding area (P < 0.001; d.f. = 3), the lowest pain on postoperative day 1 (P = 0.0004; d.f. = 3), and the highest frequency of first flatus passage (P = 0.0001; d.f. = 3). A higher number of group 4 patients were able to carry out unassisted ambulation (P < 0.0001; d.f. = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Conscious sedation coupled with SpA is a safe, reliable and effective procedure for patients undergoing RRP. The use of propofol as sedative agent offers several advantages both over other types of conscious sedation and general anesthesia.

Volatile anesthetics evoke prolonged changes in the proteome of the left ventricule myocardium: defining a molecular basis of cardioprotection?

BACKGROUND

Volatile anesthetics can alter cardiac gene and protein expression. Of those underlying molecular changes in gene and protein expression in the myocardium after exposure to volatile anesthetics that have been identified, some of them have been related to cardioprotection.

METHODS

We used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry to identify changes in the protein expression of the left ventricle myocardium of anesthesized rats. We maintained anesthesia for 3 h using isoflurane, sevoflurane or desflurane, respectively, at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and dissected the left ventricular myocardium either immediately or 72 h after the end of anesthesia.

RESULTS

We found changes of at least twofold in 106 proteins of the more than 1.600 protein spots discriminated in each gel. These differentially expressed proteins are associated with functions in glycolysis, mitochondrial respiration and stress response. No obvious difference could be observed between the patterns of differential expression of the three volatile anesthetics.

CONCLUSION

We provide the first study of post-anesthetic protein expression profiles associated with three common volatile anesthetics. These volatile anesthetics promote a distinct change in the myocardial protein expression profile, whereby changes in the expression pattern still exist 72 h after anesthesia. These proteome changes are closely related to cardioprotection and ischemic preconditioning, indicating a common functional signaling of volatile anesthestics.

Gene expression of pulmonary cytokines after sevoflurane or thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs

BACKGROUND

Volatile anaesthetics have diverse inflammatory effects on the lungs. They increase gene expression of some pro-inflammatory cytokines in alveolar macrophages whereas in alveolar type II cells they seem to decrease secretion and gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines. We have previously detected increased leukotriene C4, nitrate and nitrite concentrations in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid after sevoflurane anaesthesia. In the current study, we measured gene expression of inflammatory cytokines in the lung tissue and plasma concentrations of cytokines in pigs after thiopentone or sevoflurane anaesthesia.

METHODS

Sixteen pigs were randomly selected to receive either a continuous thiopentone infusion (control group, n = 8) or sevoflurane (n = 8) at 4.0% inspiratory concentration (1.5 MAC) in air for 6 h. Tissue samples were collected at the end of the study for measurement of gene expression of inflammatory cytokines. Blood samples were collected during anaesthesia for measurement of plasma cytokine concentrations.

RESULTS

Compared with thiopentone anaesthesia, lower gene expression of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) in lung tissue was observed after sevoflurane anaesthesia. Of measured cytokines IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 only plasma concentrations of IL-6 could be measured during the study without a difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Lower gene expression of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta was found in the intact porcine lung tissue after sevoflurane anaesthesia compared with thiopentone anaesthesia. Clinical significance of this finding is unknown.

STAT4 is a critical mediator of early innate immune responses against pulmonary Klebsiella infection

Bacterial pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. An effective innate immune response is critical for the clearance of bacteria from the lungs. IL-12, a key T1 cytokine in innate immunity, signals through STAT4. Thus, understanding how STAT4 mediates pulmonary immune responses against bacterial pathogens will have important implications for the development of rational immunotherapy targeted at augmenting innate immunity. We intratracheally administered Klebsiella pneumoniae to wild-type BALB/c and STAT4 knockout (STAT4-/-) mice. Compared with wild-type controls, STAT4-/- mice had decreased survival following intratracheal Klebsiella administration, which was associated with a higher lung and blood bacterial burden. STAT4-/- animals also displayed impaired pulmonary IFN-gamma production and decreased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including the ELR- CXC chemokines IFN-gamma-inducible protein-10 and monokine induced by IFN-gamma. Although total lung leukocyte populations were similar between STAT4-/- and wild-type animals following infection, alveolar macrophages isolated from infected STAT4-/- mice had decreased production of proinflammatory cytokines, including IFN-gamma, compared with infected wild-type mice. The intrapulmonary overexpression of IFN-gamma concomitant with the systemic administration of IFN-gamma partially reversed the immune deficits observed in STAT4-/- mice, resulting in improved bacterial clearance from the blood. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that STAT4 is required for the generation of an effective innate host defense against bacterial pathogens of the lung.