1
|
Koutp A, Hauer G, Leitner L, Kaltenegger L, Fischerauer S, Clar C, Reinbacher P, Schittek G, Leithner A, Sadoghi P. Less Induction Time and Postoperative Pain Using Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia With or Without the Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:904-909. [PMID: 37852447 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our aim was to analyze anesthetic induction time and postoperative pain using spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia with or without the use of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) in total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that spinal anesthesia would be beneficial with respect to induction time and postoperative pain and that PNBs would complement this effect. METHODS Patients were stratified according to demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA), and opioid intake and divided into: (A) general anesthesia without PNB; (B) general anesthesia with PNB; (C) spinal anesthesia without PNB; and (D) spinal anesthesia with PNB. Endpoints were anesthetic induction time, opioid consumption, and pain. Of 559 patients, 348 (62.3%) received general anesthesia (consisting of group A with 46 and group B with 302 patients), and 211 (37.7%) spinal anesthesia (consisting of group C with 117 and group D with 94 patients). RESULTS We observed significantly lower total opioid intake 48 hours postoperative when applying spinal anesthesia by 2.08 mg (P < .05) of intravenous morphine-equivalent, and a reduction of 7.0 minutes (P < .05) until skin incision. The application of a PNB achieved a reduction of piritramide intake of 3.59 mg (P < .05) 48 hours postoperative and lengthened induction time by 8.5 minutes (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Statistically shorter anesthetic induction times without clinical relevance, but lower postoperative opioid dosages with clinical relevance were observed for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia. The additional application of PNBs led to a lower need for opioids and lower pain levels in the early postoperative phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Koutp
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Georg Hauer
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Lukas Leitner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Lucas Kaltenegger
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Fischerauer
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Clemens Clar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Patrick Reinbacher
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gregor Schittek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andreas Leithner
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Patrick Sadoghi
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soeding P, Morris A, Soeding A, Hoy G. Effect of intravenous magnesium on post-operative pain following Latarjet shoulder reconstruction. Shoulder Elbow 2024; 16:46-52. [PMID: 38435030 PMCID: PMC10902413 DOI: 10.1177/17585732231158805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Background Single injection ropivacaine interscalene anesthesia (ISA) is frequently used in Latarjet reconstruction to enhance post-operative analgesia. A potential limitation is the occurrence of severe rebound pain on block resolution. We investigated the effect of intravenous magnesium on post-operative pain, particularly at the transition of block resolution to multimodal analgesia. Methods Elective patients (n = 40) having Latarjet open shoulder reconstruction were randomised to receive either intravenous magnesium sulphate 50 mg/kg (M) or normal saline (S) before induction. Post-operatively, a standardised analgesic regimen was used, and post-operative pain was recorded using a verbal numerical rating assessment (VNRA) score. Requirement for injected opioid analgesia was recorded. Results ISA provided longstanding analgesia in all patients with block duration slightly prolonged in the magnesium group (16.7(1.0) (S), 17.8(1.3) h (M), p = 0.049). Magnesium resulted in less rebound pain following ISA resolution (VNRA 4.0 (0.6) M, 6.2 (0.8) S, p = 0.03) and lower pain intensity at 24 h. Four patients had nausea and two required rescue opioid injection. Conclusion Magnesium before Latarjet surgery results in less rebound pain following ropivacaine block and improves post-operative analgesia. Magnesium may be indicated in major upper limb surgery, where significant pain intensity is anticipated. Level of evidence Treatment study; Randomised blinded; Level 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Soeding
- FANZCA Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alex Morris
- The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Adam Soeding
- Department of Preventative Medicine, The Alfred Centre Monash University, Prahran, Australia
| | - Gregory Hoy
- Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Monash University Department of Surgery, Windsor, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li S, Chen W, Feng L, Guo X. Optimal analgesic regimen for total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial and network meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:57. [PMID: 38216998 PMCID: PMC10785537 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04451-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clinical approaches to analgesia following total shoulder arthroplasty include liposomal bupivacaine, local infiltration analgesia, single-shot interscalene block, and continuous interscalene block. However, the best method remains contentious. This study conducts a network meta-analysis comparing these four methods, aiming to identify the most effective analgesic approach. METHODS Randomized controlled trials on analgesic regimens for total shoulder arthroplasty were identified through searches of PUBMED, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, covering their inception through November 2023. Network meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15.1, and the Cochrane Handbook version 5.1.0 risk of bias tool was employed for quality assessment of the literature. RESULTS Twelve randomized controlled trials were included, comprising 1537 patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty. The interventions compared were ssISB, cISB, LIA, and LB. Regarding the quality of the literature, four studies were deemed low risk, one high risk, and seven moderate risk. The network meta-analysis revealed that in terms of VAS scores in the PACU, the ssISB group was the most effective, followed by cISB and LB, with LIA being the least effective. This pattern continued in VAS scores on the first and second postoperative days. Regarding morphine consumption, the cISB group showed the most significant reduction in the PACU and on the first postoperative day, while the LIA group performed best in total postoperative morphine consumption. The shortest average hospital stay was noted in the cISB group. CONCLUSION The ssISB method excels in controlling early postoperative pain, particularly during the PACU stage and early postoperative period. Additionally, the cISB method is notable for reducing postoperative morphine consumption and shortening average hospital stays. While the LIA method ranks first in reducing total morphine consumption, it is weaker in pain control. The LB method is underwhelming across most assessment parameters. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate analgesic strategies for different postoperative recovery phases and provide valuable insights for clinicians to optimize postoperative pain management. Furthermore, they suggest a need for future research to explore the specific application and effectiveness of these methods in varying clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiye Li
- Pain Department of Hezhou People's Hospital, Hezhou, China
| | - Wenjie Chen
- Pain Department of Hezhou People's Hospital, Hezhou, China.
| | - Liang'en Feng
- Spine and Orthopaedic Department of Hezhou People's Hospital, Hezhou, China
| | - Xu Guo
- Pain Department of Hezhou People's Hospital, Hezhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Et T, Basaran B, Bilge A, Yarımoğlu R, Korkusuz M, Tülüce İ. Rebound pain after interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: a randomized clinical trial of the effect of different multimodal analgesia regimens. Ann Saudi Med 2023; 43:339-347. [PMID: 38071444 PMCID: PMC11182429 DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rebound pain is characterized by sudden, significant acute postoperative pain occurring after the resolution of inter-scalene block (ISB); it affects the quality of recovery postoperatively. Dexamethasone increases ISB resolution time and decreases opioid consumption and the incidence of rebound pain. OBJECTIVE Evaluate whether multimodal analgesia including intravenous dexamethasone administration with preoperative ISB reduces the incidence of rebound pain. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING Tertiary university hospital. SAMPLE SIZE 60 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who underwent shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were assigned randomly to two different multimodal analgesia protocols. Thirty patients received 5 mg IV dexamethasone with non-steroid, paracetamol, and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, while the control patients received the same regimen and ISB with 15 mL 0.5% bupivacaine without dexamethasone. Postoperative opioids were given to any patient on demand. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Effect of IV dexamethasone on pain score and incidence of rebound pain after ISB resolution and postoperative opioid consumption at 0-48 hours, numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) scores, sleep scale scores, and quality of recovery-15 scores (QoR-15). RESULTS The incidence of rebound pain was lower in the dexamethasone group than in the control group (73.3% and 30%, respectively, P=.001). NPRS scores after ISB resolution were lower in the dexamethasone group (5 ([4-7]), 8 ([5.75-8]), P<.001, respectively). Those who received IV dexamethasone had less sleep disturbances (P<.001) and higher QoR-15 on day 1 (P<.001) and day 7 (P=.020) postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS IV dexamethasone added to the ISB block resulted in a lower incidence of rebound pain. In addition, better results were obtained in postoperative sleep quality and QoR-15. LIMITATIONS Single-center study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayfun Et
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Betul Basaran
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Aysegul Bilge
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Rafet Yarımoğlu
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Korkusuz
- From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, Karaman, Turkey
| | - İbrahim Tülüce
- From the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Karaman Training and Research Hospital, Karaman, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen FR, Quan T, Ramamurti P, Sadur A, Tabaie S, Zimmer ZR. The association between anesthesia type and postoperative outcomes in patients receiving primary total shoulder arthroplasty. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2023; 33:2813-2819. [PMID: 36802033 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03494-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There has been interest to investigate optimal anesthetic techniques for primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). In this study, we investigate if there are differences in postoperative complications in patients receiving (1) regional alone; (2) general alone; and (3) regional plus general anesthesia for primary TSA. METHODS Patients undergoing primary TSA from 2014 to 2018 were identified in a national database. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts: general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, and general anesthesia combined with regional anesthesia. Thirty-day complications were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Of 13,386 total patients undergoing TSA, 9079 patients (67.8%) had general anesthesia, 212 (1.6%) had regional anesthesia, and 4095 (30.6%) had general anesthesia combined with regional anesthesia. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the general anesthesia group and the regional anesthesia group. Following adjustment, an increased risk of extended length of hospital stay was seen in the combined general and regional anesthesia group compared to those who only had general anesthesia (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION General versus regional versus general plus regional anesthesia have no difference in postoperative complications in patients receiving primary total shoulder arthroplasty. However, addition of regional anesthesia to general anesthesia is associated with increased length of stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank R Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 I Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA
| | - Theodore Quan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 I Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA
| | - Pradip Ramamurti
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Alana Sadur
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 I Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
| | - Sean Tabaie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zachary R Zimmer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 I Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Finneran JJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for analgesia following painful ambulatory surgery: a review with focus on recent developments in infusion technology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2023; 36:525-532. [PMID: 37552018 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Continuous peripheral nerve blocks (cPNB) decrease pain scores and opioid consumption while improving patient satisfaction following ambulatory surgery. This review focuses on the history and evolution of ambulatory cPNBs, recent developments in infusion technology that may prolong the duration of analgesia, optimal choice of cPNB for various surgical procedures, and novel analgesic modalities that may prove to be alternatives or supplements to cPNBs. RECENT FINDINGS The primary factor limiting the duration of an ambulatory cPNB is the size of the local anesthetic reservoir. Recent evidence suggests the use of automated boluses, as opposed to continuous infusions, may decrease the rate of consumption of local anesthetic and, thereby, prolong the duration of analgesia. Utilizing a long-acting local anesthetic (e.g. ropivacaine) for initial block placement and an infusion start-delay timer may further increase this duration. SUMMARY Patients undergoing painful ambulatory surgery are likely to have less pain and require fewer opioid analgesics when receiving a cPNB for postoperative analgesia. Advances in electronic pumps used for cPNBs may increase the duration of these benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Finneran
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bloc S, Alfonsi P, Belbachir A, Beaussier M, Bouvet L, Campard S, Campion S, Cazenave L, Diemunsch P, Di Maria S, Dufour G, Fabri S, Fletcher D, Garnier M, Godier A, Grillo P, Huet O, Joosten A, Lasocki S, Le Guen M, Le Saché F, Macquer I, Marquis C, de Montblanc J, Maurice-Szamburski A, Nguyen YL, Ruscio L, Zieleskiewicz L, Caillard A, Weiss E. Guidelines on perioperative optimization protocol for the adult patient 2023. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2023; 42:101264. [PMID: 37295649 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2023.101264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The French Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine [Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR)] aimed at providing guidelines for the implementation of perioperative optimization programs. DESIGN A consensus committee of 29 experts from the SFAR was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. METHODS Four fields were defined: 1) Generalities on perioperative optimization programs; 2) Preoperative measures; 3) Intraoperative measures and; 4) Postoperative measures. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer a number of questions formulated according to the PICO model (population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out using predefined keywords according to PRISMA guidelines and analyzed using the GRADE® methodology. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE® methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method. As the GRADE® methodology could have been fully applied for the vast majority of questions, the recommendations were formulated using a "formalized expert recommendations" format. RESULTS The experts' work on synthesis and application of the GRADE® method resulted in 30 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and ten a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). For one recommendation, the GRADE methodology could not be fully applied, resulting in an expert opinion. Two questions did not find any response in the literature. After two rounds of rating and several amendments, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Strong agreement among the experts was obtained to provide 30 recommendations for the elaboration and/or implementation of perioperative optimization programs in the highest number of surgical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Bloc
- Clinical Research Department, Ambroise Pare Hospital Group, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France.
| | - Pascal Alfonsi
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Paris Descartes, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, F-75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
| | - Anissa Belbachir
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, UF Douleur, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, APHP.Centre, Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marc Beaussier
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université de Paris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Bouvet
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sébastien Campion
- AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire APHP-Sorbonne Université, site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, F-75013 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS1158 Neurophysiologie Respiratoire Expérimentale et Clinique, F-75005 Paris, France
| | - Laure Cazenave
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Groupe Jeunes, French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), 75016 Paris, France
| | - Pierre Diemunsch
- Unité de Réanimation Chirurgicale, Service d'Anesthésie-réanimation Chirurgicale, Pôle Anesthésie-Réanimations Chirurgicales, Samu-Smur, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 1, Avenue Molière, 67098 Strasbourg Cedex, France
| | - Sophie Di Maria
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Guillaume Dufour
- Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU de Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Fabri
- Faculty of Economics, Management & Accountancy, University of Malta, Malta
| | - Dominique Fletcher
- Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Service d'Anesthésie, 9, Avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Marc Garnier
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Périopératoire Rive Droite, Paris, France
| | - Anne Godier
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | | | - Olivier Huet
- CHU de Brest, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest, France
| | - Alexandre Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Paul Brousse Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Villejuif, France
| | | | - Morgan Le Guen
- Paris Saclay University, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Foch Hospital, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Frédéric Le Saché
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique Drouot Sport, Paris, France; DMU DREAM Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Macquer
- Bordeaux University Hospitals, Bordeaux, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - Constance Marquis
- Clinique du Sport, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Médipole Garonne, 45 rue de Gironis - CS 13 624, 31036 Toulouse Cedex 1, France
| | - Jacques de Montblanc
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | | | - Yên-Lan Nguyen
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Department, Cochin Academic Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Laura Ruscio
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Paris-Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; INSERM U 1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Saint-Aubin, Île-de-France, France
| | - Laurent Zieleskiewicz
- Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, C2VN, France
| | - Anaîs Caillard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire La Cavale Blanche Université de Bretagne Ouest, Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Department, Brest, France
| | - Emmanuel Weiss
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP, Nord, Clichy, France; University of Paris, Paris, France; Inserm UMR_S1149, Centre for Research on Inflammation, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Elmer DA, Coleman JR, Renwick CM, Amato PE, Werner BC, Brockmeier SF, Slee AE, Hanson NA. Comparing bupivacaine alone to liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine in interscalene blocks for total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 48:1-6. [DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2022-103997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
IntroductionInterscalene brachial plexus blocks are a commonly performed procedure to reduce pain following total shoulder arthroplasty. Liposomal bupivacaine has been purported to prolong the duration of brachial plexus blocks for up to 72 hours; however, there has been controversy surrounding the analgesic benefits of this drug. Our hypothesis was that an interscalene block performed with bupivacaine alone would be non-inferior to a combination of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine with respect to opioid consumption following total shoulder arthroplasty.MethodsSubjects presenting for primary total shoulder arthroplasty were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an ultrasound-guided, single-injection interscalene block with either a combination of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine (LB group) or bupivacaine without additive (Bupi group). The primary outcome of this study was 72-hour postoperative cumulative opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents) with a non-inferiority margin of 22.5 mg. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, patient satisfaction with analgesia and patient reported duration of sensory block.ResultsSeventy-six subjects, 38 from the Bupi group and 38 from the LB group, completed the study. Analysis of the primary outcome showed a 72-hour cumulative geometric mean oral morphine equivalent consumption difference of 11.9 mg (95% CI −6.9 to 30.8) between groups (calculated on the log scale). This difference constitutes approximately 1.5 tablets of oxycodone over 3 days. No secondary outcomes showed meaningful differences between groups.DiscussionInterscalene brachial plexus blocks performed with bupivacaine alone did not demonstrate non-inferiority compared to a mixture of liposomal bupivacaine plus bupivacaine with regards to 72-hour cumulative opioid consumption following total shoulder arthroplasty. However, the difference between groups did not appear to be clinically meaningful.
Collapse
|
9
|
Puzzitiello RN, Moverman MA, Pagani NR, Menendez ME, Salzler MJ. Current Status Regarding the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. HSS J 2022; 18:428-438. [PMID: 35846253 PMCID: PMC9247601 DOI: 10.1177/15563316211019398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons have begun to transition total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to the outpatient setting in order to contain costs and reallocate resources. PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient TSA by assessing associated complication rates, clinical outcomes, and total treatment charges. METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases were queried in March 2020 for studies on outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria were (1) a study population undergoing TSA, (2) discharge on the day of surgery, and (3) inclusion of at least 1 reported outcome. RESULTS Of 20 studies identified that met inclusion criteria, 14 were comparative studies involving an inpatient control group, 2 of which were matched by age and comorbidities. The remaining studies used control groups consisting of inpatient TSAs who were older or more medically infirm according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. The combined average age of the outpatient and inpatient groups was 66.5 and 70.1 years, respectively. Patients who underwent outpatient TSA had similar rates of readmissions, emergency department visits, and perioperative complications in comparison to inpatients. Patients also reported comparably high levels of satisfaction with outpatient procedures. Four economic analyses demonstrated substantial cost savings with outpatient TSA in comparison to inpatient surgery. CONCLUSION In carefully selected patients, outpatient TSA appears to be equally safe but less resource intensive than inpatient arthroplasty. Nonetheless, there remains a need for larger prospective studies to decisively characterize the relative safety of outpatient TSA among patients with similar baseline health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard N. Puzzitiello
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA,Richard N. Puzzitiello, MD, Department of
Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine,
Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| | - Michael A. Moverman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas R. Pagani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mariano E. Menendez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew J. Salzler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
King HE, Ricketts D, Roper T, Phadnis J. Few UK vascular centres offer a fully NICE-compliant supervised exercise programme: a national audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2022; 104:130-137. [PMID: 34982604 PMCID: PMC9246563 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To determine the current (pre-COVID-19) provision of supervised exercise training (SET) for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in UK Vascular Centres. METHODS Hospital Trusts delivering vascular care to patients with PAD were identified from the National Vascular Registry and asked to complete an online questionnaire on their provisions for SET. If a centre offered SET, they were asked questions to determine whether the programme was compliant with NICE guidelines and the difficulties they faced delivering the service. If centres did not offer SET, they were asked what obstacles prevented them implement SET. RESULTS Of the 78 UK vascular centres, 59 (76%) responded and were included in the audit. Of these, 27 (46%) were able to offer SET but only 21 (36%) could offer it to all their patients with PAD. Only four (6.8%) offered SET that was fully compliant with current NICE guidelines. Reasons identified included insufficient funding, lack of resource and poor patient compliance. CONCLUSIONS The benefits of SET are well established yet the availability of the service in the UK is poor. The reasons for this are readily identified but have not yet been overcome. Research on novel methods of delivering supervised exercise that mitigates existing barriers, such as home exercise with remote monitoring, should be prioritised to facilitate optimal management for our patients with PAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- HE King
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - T Roper
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sun LY, Basireddy S, Gerber LN, Lamano J, Costouros J, Cheung E, Boublik J, Horn JL, Tsui BCH. Continuous interscalene versus phrenic nerve-sparing high-thoracic erector spinae plane block for total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth 2022; 69:614-623. [PMID: 35237953 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02216-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The high-thoracic erector spinae plane block (HT-ESPB) has been reported as an effective analgesic modality for the shoulder region without phrenic nerve palsy. The goal of this study was to compare the HT-ESPB as a phrenic nerve-sparing alternative to an interscalene block for total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS Thirty patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty at Stanford Health Care (Palo Alto, CA, USA) were enrolled in a double-blind randomized controlled trial. We randomized 28 patients to receive either an interscalene or HT-ESPB perineural catheter preoperatively; 26 patients were included in the final analysis. The study was powered for the primary outcome of incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Other outcome measures included incentive spirometry volume, brachial plexus motor and sensory exams, adverse events, pain scores, and opioid consumption. RESULTS The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis in the HT-ESPB catheter group was significantly lower than in the interscalene catheter group (0/12, 0% vs 14/14, 100%; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in pain scores and opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents) between the interscalene and HT-ESPB groups through postoperative day (POD) 2. Nevertheless, the mean (standard deviation) point estimates for opioid consumption for the HT-ESPB group were higher than for the interscalene group in the PACU (HT-ESPB: 24.8 [26.7] mg; interscalene: 10.7 [21.7] mg) and for POD 0 (HT-ESPB: 20.5 [25.0] mg; interscalene: 6.7 [12.0] mg). In addition, cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was significantly higher at POD 0 (PACU through POD 0) in the HT-ESPB group (45.3 [39.9] mg) than in the interscalene group (16.6 [21.9] mg; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that continuous HT-ESPB can be a phrenic nerve-sparing alternative to continuous interscalene brachial plexus blockade, although the latter provided superior opioid-sparing in the immediate postoperative period. This was a small sample size study, and further investigations powered to detect differences in analgesic and quality of recovery score endpoints are needed. STUDY REGISTRATION www. CLINICALTRIALS gov (NCT03807505); registered 17 January 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Y Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Lynn Ngai Gerber
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Rm H3580, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Jason Lamano
- Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, USA
| | - John Costouros
- Institute for Joint Restoration, Dearborn & Associates, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Emilie Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, USA
| | - Jan Boublik
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Rm H3580, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Jean Louis Horn
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Rm H3580, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Ban C H Tsui
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Rm H3580, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Judkins BL, Hao KA, Wright TW, Jones BK, Boezaart AP, Tighe P, Vasilopoulos T, Horodyski M, King JJ. Early reduction in postoperative pain is associated with improved long-term function after shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective case series. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2022; 33:1023-1030. [PMID: 35286469 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-022-03242-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mixed modalities are frequently utilized in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to control pain, improve patient satisfaction, reduce narcotics use and facilitate earlier discharge. We investigate the relationship between early postoperative pain control and long-term functional outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS A retrospective review identified 294 patients (314 shoulders) who underwent anatomic or reverse TSA and received a continuous cervical paravertebral nerve block perioperatively. Opioid and non-opioid analgesics were also available to the patients in an "as needed" capacity to augment perioperative pain control. In addition to demographic and surgical characteristics, the impact on functional outcomes of relative pain (i.e., a patient's subjective pain relative to the entire cohort), pain gradient (i.e., the slope of a patient's subjective pain), and opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively were assessed. Shoulder function was assessed using validated outcome measures collected at 2 year follow-up. Outcomes were measured using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons questionnaire (ASES), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), SPADI-130, Raw and Normalized Constant Score, SST-12 and UCLA score. RESULTS Patients younger than 65, females, reverse TSA, revisions, and preoperative opioid users had worse functional outcomes. On univariate analysis, increased pain perioperatively (> 50% percentile relative pain) was associated with decreased function at 2 years when analyzed with all seven outcome scores (P < .001 for all), reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using the Constant Score. On multivariate analysis, increased pain in the first 24 h postoperatively (assessed on a continuous scale) was independently associated with worse ASES, SPADI, and SPADI-130 scores. Intraoperative ketamine administration and opioid consumption in the 24 h postoperative period did not influence long-term shoulder function. CONCLUSION Patients reporting reduced pain after TSA demonstrated improved shoulder function with the Constant score at 2 years postoperatively in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Larger-scale investigation may be warranted to see if this is true for other functional outcome measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, treatment study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Judkins
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Prisma Health - Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Kevin A Hao
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Braden K Jones
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Andre P Boezaart
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.,Lumina Health Pain Medicine Collaborative, Surrey, UK
| | - Patrick Tighe
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - MaryBeth Horodyski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA
| | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Institute, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e233-e241. [PMID: 34644715 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Changes in healthcare policy have driven many hospital-based surgeries to the outpatient environment. Multiple studies have shown outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a safe alternative to the inpatient setting. This systematic review evaluates patient selection, perioperative protocols, complications, costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes of outpatient TSA and compares these with their inpatient counterparts. METHODS The Emnbase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases were queried on April 30, 2020, for outpatient TSA studies, identifying 232 articles, with 21 meeting inclusion criteria. This involved 25,808 and 231,408 patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient TSA, respectively. Failed same-day discharge, readmissions, revision surgeries, cost, and complications among outpatient TSA were aggregated when raw numbers were available. Statistical significance for comparisons among outpatient and inpatient TSA within individual studies was alpha = 0.05. RESULTS Ten studies evaluated same-day discharge rate, with 440 of 446 patients (98.7%) meeting the goals. Fourteen studies evaluated readmissions, revision surgeries, and complications, with readmissions in 238 of 6,133 patients (3.9%), revision surgeries in 32 of 1,484 patients (2.1%), and complications in 376 of 4,977 patients (7.6%). Readmission rates were similar between inpatients and outpatients, with only one study finding more readmissions after inpatient TSA. Complications were more common in inpatient TSA in five studies. Outpatient TSA demonstrated a charge reduction of $25,509 to $53,202 per patient, and patient satisfaction after outpatient TSA was "good to excellent" in more than 95% of patients. Patient selection for outpatient TSA used patient age, medical comorbidities, social support, living proximity to location of surgery, and lack of preoperative opioid use. DISCUSSION Outpatient TSA in appropriately selected patients is a safe and cost-effective alternative to inpatient TSA. However, the literature is limited to national database or small retrospective studies. Large prospective, cohort studies are necessary to further assess differences in complication profiles between outpatient and inpatient TSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV; systematic review.
Collapse
|
14
|
Allahabadi S, Cheung EC, Hodax JD, Feeley BT, Ma CB, Lansdown DA. Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2022; 5:24715492211028025. [PMID: 34993380 PMCID: PMC8492032 DOI: 10.1177/24715492211028025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Recent reports have shown that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA) may be a safe alternative to inpatient management in appropriately selected patients. The purpose was to review the literature reporting on outpatient SA. Methods A systematic review of publications on outpatient SA was performed. Included publications discussed patients who were discharged on the same calendar day or within 23 hours from surgery. Articles were categorized by discussions on complications, readmissions, and safety, patient selection, pain management strategies, cost effectiveness, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Results Twenty-six articles were included. Patients undergoing outpatient SA were younger and with a lower BMI than those undergoing inpatient SA. Larger database studies reported more medical complications for patients undergoing inpatient compared to outpatient SA. Articles on pain management strategies discussed both single shot and continuous interscalene blocks with similar outcomes. Both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction following outpatient SA, and cost analysis studies demonstrated significant cost savings for outpatient SA. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, outpatient SA can be a safe, cost-saving alternative to inpatient care and may lead to high satisfaction of both patients and physicians, though further studies are needed to clarify appropriate utilization of outpatient SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Allahabadi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Edward C Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jonathan D Hodax
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Chunbong B Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xiao M, Cohen SA, Cheung EV, Freehill MT, Abrams GD. Pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:2638-2647. [PMID: 34284094 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain management after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can be challenging. Given the variety of pain management options available, the purpose of this investigation was to systematically review the literature for randomized controlled trials reporting on pain control after shoulder arthroplasty. We sought to determine which modalities are most effective in managing postoperative pain and reducing postoperative opioid use. METHODS A systematic review was performed using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for Level I-II randomized controlled trials that compared interventions for postoperative pain control after TSA. Pain control measures included nerve blocks and nerve block adjuncts, local injections, patient-controlled analgesia, oral medications, and other modalities. The 2 primary outcome measures were pain level measured on a 0-10 visual analog scale and opioid use. The risk of study bias and methodologic quality were analyzed using The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Network meta-analyses were performed for visual analog scale pain scores at postsurgical time points and opioid use using a frequentist approach and random-effects model, with heterogeneity quantified using the I2 statistic. Treatments were ranked using the P score, and statistical significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS The initial search yielded 2391 articles (695 duplicates, 1696 screened, 53 undergoing full-text review). Eighteen articles (1358 shoulders; 51% female patients; mean age range, 65-73.7 years; 4 studies with low risk of bias, 12 with some risk, and 2 with high risk) were included and analyzed. At 4 and 8 hours postoperatively, patients receiving local liposomal bupivacaine (LB) injection (P < .001 for 4 and 8 hours) or local ropivacaine injection (P < .001 for 4 hours and P = .019 for 8 hours) had significantly more pain compared with patients who received either a continuous interscalene block (cISB) or single-shot interscalene block (ssISB). No differences in opioid use (at P < .05) were detected between modalities. The P scores of treatments demonstrated that ssISBs were most favorable at time points < 24 hours, whereas pain at 24 and 48 hours after surgery was best managed with cISBs or a combination of an ssISB with a local LB injection. CONCLUSION Interscalene blocks are superior to local injections alone at managing pain after TSA. Single-shot interscalene blocks are optimal for reducing early postoperative pain (< 24 hours), whereas pain at 24-48 hours after surgery may be best managed with cISBs or a combination of an ssISB with a local LB injection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Xiao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Samuel A Cohen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Emilie V Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael T Freehill
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Abrams
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vaughan BN, Bartone CL, McCarthy CM, Answini GA, Hurford WE. Ultrasound-Guided Continuous Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Are Associated with Reduced Opioid Consumption and Length of Stay for Open Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215022. [PMID: 34768541 PMCID: PMC8584924 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study tested the hypothesis that continuous bilateral erector spinae plane blocks placed preoperatively would reduce opioid consumption and improve outcomes compared with standard practice in open cardiac surgery patients. Patients who received bilateral continuous erector spinae plane blocks for primary open coronary bypass, aortic valve, or ascending aortic surgery were compared to a historical control group. Patients in the block group received a 0.5% ropivacaine bolus preoperatively followed by a 0.2% ropivacaine infusion begun postoperatively. No other changes were made to the perioperative care protocol. The primary outcome was opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were time to extubation and length of stay. Twenty-eight patients received continuous erector spinae plane blocks and fifty patients served as historic controls. Patients who received blocks consumed less opioids, expressed as oral morphine equivalents, both intraoperatively (34 ± 17 vs. 224 ± 125 mg) and during their hospitalization (224 ± 108 vs. 461 ± 185 mg). Patients who received blocks had shorter times to extubation (126 ± 87 vs. 257 ± 188 min) and lengths of stay in the intensive care unit (35 ± 17 vs. 58 ± 42 h) and hospital (5.6 ± 1.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.6 days). Continuous erector spinae plane blocks placed prior to open cardiac surgical procedures reduced opioid consumption, time to extubation, and length of stay compared to a standard perioperative pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian N. Vaughan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-513-258-6313
| | - Cheryl L. Bartone
- The Christ Hospital Health Network, Heart and Vascular Services, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA; (C.L.B.); (C.M.M.); (G.A.A.)
| | - Catherine M. McCarthy
- The Christ Hospital Health Network, Heart and Vascular Services, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA; (C.L.B.); (C.M.M.); (G.A.A.)
| | - Geoffrey A. Answini
- The Christ Hospital Health Network, Heart and Vascular Services, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA; (C.L.B.); (C.M.M.); (G.A.A.)
| | - William E. Hurford
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mancel L, Van Loon K, Lopez AM. Role of regional anesthesia in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2021; 34:616-625. [PMID: 34325463 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols and interventional locoregional anesthesia (LRA) techniques continuously evolve. This review outlines the latest recommendations for the use of regional anesthesia in ERAS protocols and emerging interventional analgesia techniques. RECENT FINDINGS Research in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has led to a refinement of the traditional techniques and the introduction of a number of new approaches to complement ERAS strategies. The efficacy and versatility of LRA enable its use in an increasing number of ERAS indications. SUMMARY The implementation of ERAS protocols in different surgical procedures reduces overall complications and recovery time. Multimodal analgesia strategies with regional anesthesia techniques are some of the key interventions contributing to the improvement in postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leander Mancel
- Department of Anesthesiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Opioid requirements in primary versus revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2021; 32:1509-1515. [PMID: 34559303 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03121-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the inpatient pain medication use of patients who had a revision shoulder arthroplasty procedure performed and compare them to a cohort of patients who had a primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) performed to determine whether revision shoulder arthroplasty requires more pain medication.. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing revision arthroplasty (n = 75) and primary rTSA (n = 340). Inpatient medication records were reviewed to tabulate the visual analog pain (VAS) all narcotic medication use, and total morphine equivalent units (MEUs) were calculated for the duration of the inpatient stay. RESULTS There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative narcotic pain medication use, tobacco use, postoperative VAS scores or hospital length of stay. There were no predictors of total postoperative MEUs identified. Overall, patients in the revision arthroplasty group received significantly less total MEUs than those in the primary rTSA group, 134.96 MEUs vs. 69.79 MEUs, respectively (p < .0005). CONCLUSION The perceived notion that revision shoulder arthroplasty is more painful may cause providers to be more inclined to increase narcotic use, or use more invasive pain control techniques. Based on these data, we found that revision shoulder arthroplasty did not require an increased opioid requirement, longer length of stay or increase VAS, suggesting that these patients can often be managed similarly to primary rTSA.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ilfeld BM, Plunkett A, Vijjeswarapu AM, Hackworth R, Dhanjal S, Turan A, Cohen SP, Eisenach JC, Griffith S, Hanling S, Sessler DI, Mascha EJ, Han Y, Boggs JW, Wongsarnpigoon A, Gelfand H. Percutaneous Neuromodulation of the Brachial Plexus and Sciatic Nerve for the Treatment of Acute Pain Following Surgery: Secondary Outcomes From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. Neuromodulation 2021; 26:638-649. [PMID: 34343394 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We recently reported that percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS or "neuromodulation") decreased pain and opioid consumption within the first two weeks following ambulatory surgery. However, the anatomic lead locations were combined for the analysis, and benefits for each location remain unknown. We therefore now report the effects of percutaneous PNS for brachial plexus and sciatic nerve leads separately. MATERIALS AND METHODS Before surgery, leads were implanted percutaneously to target the brachial plexus (N = 21) for rotator cuff repair or sciatic nerve (N = 40) for foot/ankle surgery, followed by a single injection of local anesthetic. Postoperatively, subjects were randomized in a double masked fashion to 14 days of electrical stimulation (N = 30) or sham/placebo (N = 31) using an external pulse generator. The primary outcome of interest was opioid consumption and pain scores evaluated jointly. Thus, stimulation was deemed effective if superior on either outcome and at least noninferior on the other. RESULTS For brachial plexus leads, during the first seven postoperative days pain measured with the numeric rating scale in participants given active stimulation was a median [interquartile range ] of 0.8 [0.5, 1.6] versus 3.2 [2.7, 3.5] in patients given sham (p < 0.001). For this same group, opioid consumption in participants given active stimulation was 10 mg [5, 20] versus 71 mg [35, 125] in patients given sham (p = 0.043). For sciatic nerve leads, pain scores for the active treatment group were 0.7 [0, 1.4] versus 2.8 [1.6, 4.6] in patients given sham (p < 0.001). During this same period, participants given active stimulation consumed 5 mg [0, 30] of opioids versus 40 mg [20, 105] in patients given sham (p = 0.004). Treatment effects did not differ statistically between the two locations. CONCLUSIONS Ambulatory percutaneous PNS of both the brachial plexus and sciatic nerve is an effective treatment for acute pain free of systemic side-effects following painful orthopedic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.,Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Anthony Plunkett
- Department of Anesthesiology, Womack Army Medical Center, Fayetteville, NC, USA
| | | | - Robert Hackworth
- Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sandeep Dhanjal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Alparslan Turan
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Departments of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James C Eisenach
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Scott Griffith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Steven Hanling
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Columbia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Daniel I Sessler
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Edward J Mascha
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Yanyan Han
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.,Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Harold Gelfand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (Neuromodulation) for Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Sham-controlled Pilot Study. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:95-110. [PMID: 33856424 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation is an analgesic technique involving the percutaneous implantation of a lead followed by the delivery of electric current using an external pulse generator. Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation has been used extensively for chronic pain, but only uncontrolled series have been published for acute postoperative pain. The current multicenter study was undertaken to (1) determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol for a subsequent clinical trial and (2) estimate the treatment effect of percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation on postoperative pain and opioid consumption. METHODS Preoperatively, an electrical lead was percutaneously implanted to target the sciatic nerve for major foot/ankle surgery (e.g., hallux valgus correction), the femoral nerve for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, or the brachial plexus for rotator cuff repair, followed by a single injection of long-acting local anesthetic along the same nerve/plexus. Postoperatively, participants were randomized to 14 days of either electrical stimulation (n = 32) or sham stimulation (n = 34) using an external pulse generator in a double-masked fashion. The dual primary treatment effect outcome measures were (1) cumulative opioid consumption (in oral morphine equivalents) and (2) mean values of the "average" daily pain scores measured on the 0 to 10 Numeric Rating Scale within the first 7 postoperative days. RESULTS During the first 7 postoperative days, opioid consumption in participants given active stimulation was a median (interquartile range) of 5 mg (0 to 30) versus 48 mg (25 to 90) in patients given sham treatment (ratio of geometric means, 0.20 [97.5% CI, 0.07 to 0.57]; P < 0.001). During this same period, the average pain intensity in patients given active stimulation was a mean ± SD of 1.1 ± 1.1 versus 3.1 ± 1.7 in those given sham (difference, -1.8 [97.5% CI, -2.6 to -0.9]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation reduced pain scores and opioid requirements free of systemic side effects during at least the initial week after ambulatory orthopedic surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
|
21
|
Ali I, Gupta HO, Khazzam M, Thomas GL, Vattigunta S, Shi BY, Jenkins SG, Srikumaran U. Do local liposomal bupivacaine and interscalene nerve block provide similar pain control after shoulder arthroplasty? A dual-center randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:S145-S152. [PMID: 33894365 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interscalene nerve block (INB) has become a popular technique for shoulder anesthesia. However, INB is associated with complication rates as high as 20%. Local liposomal bupivacaine (LLB) is an alternative to INB that potentially offers extended pain control with fewer adverse effects. METHODS We conducted a dual-center randomized controlled trial of 108 participants who were treated with LLB (n = 54) or INB (n = 54) to control pain after shoulder arthroplasty. We assessed visual analog scale pain scores at 6-hour intervals from 6 to 96 hours postoperatively and at the first postoperative visit. We assessed opioid medication consumption intraoperatively and on days 1, 2, 3, and 4 postoperatively, as well as the duration of hospital and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stays. RESULTS At 6 hours postoperatively, the mean visual analog scale pain score was lower in the INB group (2.9 ± 3.1) than in the LLB group (5.1 ± 2.9, P < .01). The INB group consumed less opioid medication during the first 24 hours postoperatively (18 ± 12 morphine milligram equivalents) than did the LLB group (36 ± 48 morphine milligram equivalents, P = .01). The PACU stay was shorter in the INB group (102 ± 53 minutes) compared with the LLB group (139 ± 77 minutes, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Compared with LLB, INB provides better pain control immediately after shoulder arthroplasty as evidenced by shorter PACU stays, lower pain scores at 6 hours postoperatively, and less opioid medication consumption during the first 24 hours postoperatively. However, no differences in outcomes were observed between groups beyond 24 hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Ali
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hari Om Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Khazzam
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Geneva L Thomas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Saisanjana Vattigunta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Brendan Y Shi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sabrina G Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Uma Srikumaran
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ilfeld BM, Gelfand H, Dhanjal S, Hackworth R, Plunkett A, Turan A, Vijjeswarapu AM, Cohen SP, Eisenach JC, Griffith S, Hanling S, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Pragmatic Effectiveness Trial of a Nonpharmacologic Alternative for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 21:S53-S61. [PMID: 33313729 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an analgesic modality involving the insertion of a lead through an introducer needle followed by the delivery of electric current after needle withdrawal. This modality has been used extensively to treat chronic pain, but only small series have been published involving postoperative pain. The ultimate objective of this study is to determine the postoperative effects of percutaneous PNS following moderately to severely painful ambulatory surgery within a real-world clinical practice setting. The primary hypothesis is that surgical pain and opioid consumption during the initial 7 days after surgery will be reduced by percutaneous PNS compared with usual and customary analgesia (dual primary outcome measures). DESIGN A multicenter pragmatic effectiveness trial. We are randomizing participants having painful orthopedic surgical procedures of the upper and lower extremity to receive 14 days of either 1) electrical stimulation or 2) sham in a double-masked fashion. End points are being assessed at various time points over 12 postoperative months. SUMMARY The postoperative experience will be much improved if percutaneous PNS provides potent analgesia while concurrently decreasing opioid requirements following painful surgery. Because this modality can be administered for up to 60 days at home, it may provide postoperative analgesia that outlasts surgical pain yet has relatively few risks and, unlike opioids, has no systemic side effects or potential for abuse, addiction, and overdose. Percutaneous PNS has the potential to revolutionize postoperative analgesia as it has been practiced for the past century. This study will inform key stakeholders regarding an evidence-based nonpharmacologic approach to the management of postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Ilfeld
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Harold Gelfand
- Department of Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sandeep Dhanjal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Robert Hackworth
- Department of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Anthony Plunkett
- Department of Anesthesiology, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, Fayetteville, North Carolina
| | - Alparslan Turan
- Department of General Anesthesiology and Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alice M Vijjeswarapu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Steven P Cohen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James C Eisenach
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Scott Griffith
- Department of Anesthesiology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Steven Hanling
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Columbia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Edward J Mascha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel I Sessler
- Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hattrup SJ, Chung AS, Rosenfeld DM, Misra L, Koyyalamudi V, Ritz ML, Tokish JM. Liposomal bupivacaine interscalene nerve block in shoulder arthroplasty is not superior to plain bupivacaine: a double-blinded prospective randomized control trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:587-598. [PMID: 33045330 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interscalene brachial plexus blocks are a common modality used to provide adjunctive pain relief with shoulder replacement surgery. In 2018, the Federal Drug Administration approved the use of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for such nerve blocks. We sought to evaluate whether this formulation of bupivacaine would provide superior pain relief for shoulder replacement patients over standard bupivacaine alone. Our hypotheses were that in the LB cohort the average postoperative pain score over the first 72 hours would be significantly lower, time to block cessation would be longer, total opioid consumption would be lower, and the average patient satisfaction score regarding their pain management would be higher. MATERIALS AND METHODS A randomized, double-blinded study was designed comparing primary shoulder replacement surgery after an interscalene block with 25 mL of 0.5% plain bupivacaine vs. 133 mg of LB with 7.5 mL of 0.5% and 7.5 mL of 0.25% plain bupivacaine. A total of 104 patients were included in the study, with an equal number in each study arm. Patients' visual analog pain scores (VAPS) were followed for their inpatient stay, first 3 full outpatient days, and at a 3-week follow-up. Use of opioid medication was recorded for the same intervals and converted to morphine milligram equivalents. The time to first opioid rescue was documented, as well as the patients' satisfaction with their pain management at both the 3-day and 3-week intervals. RESULTS No clinically relevant advantage to the use of LB over plain bupivacaine was found. During the second postoperative day, the mean VAPS was 2.4 with LB vs. 3.3 in the standard cohort (P = .0409). The only other statistically significant finding was a higher VAPS with LB during the third full day home compared with standard bupivacaine (4.0 vs. 2.8, respectively, P = .0197). Both of these differences were less than the minimal clinically important difference of 2 for the VAPS. Analysis of the VAPS for the first and third postoperative days, the first and second full days home, and at 3 weeks revealed no significant difference. Similarly, there was no significant difference in time to first opioid rescue, total morphine milligram equivalent use, and patient satisfaction with pain management. CONCLUSION When used for an interscalene block to provide adjunctive pain relief in shoulder replacement surgery, the addition of LB to plain bupivacaine provides no additional clinically important benefit to the patient's pain experience over standard bupivacaine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven J Hattrup
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | - Andrew S Chung
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Lopa Misra
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Matthew L Ritz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - John M Tokish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Incidence and effects of postoperative migration of interscalene catheter tips placed using ultrasound-guided anterior and posterior approaches. J Anesth 2021; 35:175-183. [PMID: 33416994 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02888-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) provides analgesia after shoulder surgery. However, even a catheter securely fixed at the insertion site may be susceptible to migration, precluding the block from working consistently. We examined to see if catheter tip migration would occur with no catheter-at-skin change after anterior and posterior approaches to CISB in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, and compared the incidence rate and pain scores between approaches and between catheters with and without tip migration, respectively. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to receive CISB using either anterior or posterior approach. Catheter tip was observed using a cross-sectional view. The rates of catheter tip migration with no catheter-at-skin change at 24 h after the two approaches were calculated and compared, and pain scores were compared between catheters with and without tip migration after each approach. RESULTS Fifty-four patients were analyzed. Catheter tip migration occurred at 24 h at a similar rate after both approaches (anterior approach 40.7% versus posterior approach 33.3%, p = 0.78). Worst pain score was significantly higher for 24 h in patients whose catheter tip had migrated as compared with those whose catheter had not migrated after anterior (median [IQR] 53 [42-73] versus 18 [0-50], p = 0.003) and posterior approaches (median [IQR] 63 [57-81] versus 29 [3-47], p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION In patients undergoing shoulder surgery, an interscalene catheter tip can migrate after both anterior and posterior approaches at a similar rate, even if the catheter insertion length is not changed. The tip migration does decrease the analgesic effect of CISB.
Collapse
|
25
|
Chan JJ, Cirino CM, Vargas L, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, Mazumdar M, Galatz LM, Cagle PJ. Peripheral nerve block use in inpatient and outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a population-based study evaluating utilization and outcomes. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 45:818-825. [DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundPeripheral nerve block (PNB) is an effective pain management option after shoulder arthroplasty with increasing popularity over the past decade. Large-scale US data in shoulder arthroplasties are lacking, especially regarding impacts on opioid utilization. This population-based study aimed to evaluate PNB utilization patterns and their effect on outcomes after inpatient and outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the nationwide Premier Healthcare claims database (2006–2016). This study includes n=94 787 and n=3293 inpatient and outpatient (total, reverse and partial) shoulder arthroplasty procedures. Multivariable mixed-effects models estimated associations between PNB use and opioid utilization in oral morphine equivalents and cost of hospitalization/stay. For the inpatient group, additional outcome measures were length of stay (LOS), admission to a skilled nurse facility, 30-day readmission, combined complications and naloxone use (as a proxy for opioid-related complications). We report OR (or % change for continuous variables) and 95% CIs.ResultsOverall, PNB was used in 19.1% (n=18 144) and 20.8% (n=685) of inpatient and outpatient shoulder arthroplasties, respectively, with an increasing trend for inpatient procedures. PNB utilization was consistently associated with lower (up to −14.0%, 95% CI −15.4% to −12.5% decrease, with median 100 and 90 oral morphine equivalents for inpatient and outpatient procedures) opioid utilization on the day of surgery with more potent effects seen for inpatient shoulder arthroplasties. Other outcomes were minimally impacted.DiscussionIn this first national study on PNB use in shoulder arthroplasty, we found increasing PNB use among specifically, inpatient procedures, resulting in particularly reduced opioid use on the day of surgery. While our findings may support PNB use in shoulder arthroplasty, its current low utilization and trends towards more outpatient procedures necessitate continuous monitoring of more extensive benefits.
Collapse
|
26
|
Harris C, Ignatowicz A, Lasserson DS. What are physiotherapists and occupational therapists doing in services that replace acute hospital admission? A systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 2020; 74:e13462. [PMID: 31830350 DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alternatives to acute hospital admission are required to accommodate the increasing pressures on health services. Since physiotherapists and occupational therapists are integral to inpatient teams, they may also be integral to admission replacement services, and thus their roles in these services merit investigation. AIMS Primarily to determine the presence and roles of physiotherapists and occupational therapists in services replacing acute hospital admission. The secondary outcome is to determine the impact of therapists in such services. METHODS Five electronic databases were searched, with keywords related to therapy, discharge, and admission replacement. Inclusion criteria were that studies explicitly described at least one therapist role within a service replacing acute hospital admissions. Two authors independently reviewed all potentially eligible studies. Two reviewers independently assessed data extracted from included studies into a standardized data extraction form. RESULTS Fifteen studies (3 Hospital at Home, 12 Early Supported Discharge) were included. Both clinical (eg, exercise prescription) and non-clinical (eg, organization and study outcome assessments) therapist roles were described in different admission substitution services. Some roles were only reported among teams, not individually ascribed to therapists. CONCLUSIONS The roles of therapists in services that replace hospital admission are rarely described in detail, with wide variation in reported roles, including across service types and patient populations. This review could not determine the impact of individual therapists on patient or service-level outcomes. Future studies need to more clearly define therapist roles and impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciara Harris
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Daniel S Lasserson
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Borakati A, Ali A, Nagaraj C, Gadikoppula S, Kurer M. Day case vs inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis. World J Orthop 2020; 11:213-221. [PMID: 32405470 PMCID: PMC7206195 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Day case total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a novel approach, not widely practiced in Europe. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients comparing elective day case and inpatient TSAs in our United Kingdom centre.
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of day case TSA compared to standard inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS All patients undergoing TSA between January 2017 and July 2018 were included. Outcome measures were: Change in abduction and extension 3 mo postoperatively; 30-d postoperative adverse events and re-admissions in day case and inpatient groups. We also conducted an economic evaluation of outpatient arthroplasty. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to adjust for demographic and operative covariates.
RESULTS Fifty nine patients were included, 18 d cases and 41 inpatients. There were no adverse events or re-admissions at 30 d postoperatively in either group. There were no significant differences in adjusted flexion (mean difference 16.4, 95%CI: 17.6-50.5, P = 0.337) or abduction (mean difference: 13.2, 95%CI: 18.4-44.9, P = 0.405) postoperatively between groups. Median savings with outpatient arthroplasty were £529 (interquartile range: 247.33-789, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION Day case TSA is a safe, effective procedure, with significant cost benefit. Wider use may be warranted in the United Kingdom and beyond, with potential for significant cost savings and improved efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Borakati
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital and University College London, London NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
| | - Asad Ali
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom
| | - Chetana Nagaraj
- Department of Anaesthesia, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom
| | - Srinivas Gadikoppula
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Kurer
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, London N18 1QX, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ferré F, Pommier M, Laumonerie P, Ferrier A, Menut R, Bosch L, Balech V, Bonnevialle N, Minville V. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound‐guided anterior vs. posterior suprascapular nerve block: a double‐blind, randomised control trial. Anaesthesia 2020; 75:499-508. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.14978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F. Ferré
- Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - M. Pommier
- Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - P. Laumonerie
- Département d'Orthopédie Traumatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - A. Ferrier
- Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - R. Menut
- Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - L. Bosch
- Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - V. Balech
- Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - N. Bonnevialle
- Département d'Orthopédie Traumatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| | - V. Minville
- Département d'Anesthésie Réanimation Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse Purpan Hôpital Riquet Université Toulouse 3‐Paul Sabatier Toulouse France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Regional anaesthesia for surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139:1731-1741. [PMID: 31392408 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03253-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Regional anaesthesia (RA) is often used in shoulder surgery because it provides adequate postoperative analgesia and may enhance the patient outcome. RA reduces overall opioid consumption and is frequently used in enhanced recovery programs to decrease hospital stay. However, there is very limited literature confirming these advantages in the surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures. This paper reviews the current literature on the use of RA in pain management after surgical repair of these fractures and evaluates the effect of RA on the functional outcome, length of stay in hospital, and health care expenditure. MATERIALS AND METHODS The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to March 1, 2018. Studies investigating the use of RA in the management of proximal humerus fractures were included. RESULTS Eleven studies (containing 1872 patients) were eligible for inclusion. The analgesic effect of RA was investigated in eight studies that confirmed its pain-relieving ability. Two studies measured functionality and length of hospitalization and suggested that RA improved function and shortened the stay in hospital. Nine papers mentioned side effects associated with RA while three articles claim that RA decreases the incidence of adverse events associated with general anaesthesia. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review suggests that RA is a good option for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing surgical repair of a proximal humerus fracture and is associated with fewer adverse events, a shorter recovery time, and a better functional outcome than those achieved by general anaesthesia alone. However, given the limited amount of data available, conclusions need to be made with caution and prospective studies are needed in the future.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) focuses on optimizing each element on a treatment pathway and encouraging the patient to actively engage in his or her recovery and rehabilitation. It requires collaboration across a multidisciplinary team and has been successful in improving patient outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and costs for a wide range of surgical procedures, including musculoskeletal surgeries such as total hip and total knee replacement. PURPOSE To examine the application of ERAS concepts to total shoulder replacement (TSR) surgery. METHODS Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England on LOS for TSR surgery were examined, and a review of literature on the use of ERAS concepts in TSR was undertaken. RESULTS Analysis of HES data suggested scope for improvement in reducing LOS. A review of the literature found some evidence of the use of ERAS concepts, particularly in multimodal pain management. CONCLUSIONS Future research is now required for ERAS procedure-specific components for TSR surgery.
Collapse
|
31
|
Seering MS, Bayman EO, Wong CA, Ranganath YS, Marian AA. Comparison of the effect of three different adjuvants on the analgesic duration of single injection interscalene brachial plexus block: a prospective, randomized, triple blinded clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2019; 44:rapm-2018-100201. [PMID: 31308262 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Use of regional anesthesia can result in faster recovery and better patient satisfaction. Addition of perineural adjuncts to local anesthetics may improve the duration of analgesia, but there is a paucity of data comparing them in a single randomized trial. We compared the effects of three adjuncts clonidine, dexamethasone, and buprenorphine, on the duration of analgesia of interscalene brachial plexus block. METHODS 160 patients, undergoing elective shoulder surgery, were randomized to four groups to receive an interscalene block with one of the following solutions: ropivacaine alone, ropivacaine with clonidine 75 µg, ropivacaine with dexamethasone 8 mg, or ropivacaine with buprenorphine 300 µg. The primary outcome variable was the duration of analgesia; secondary outcome measures were time to onset of the block, and the duration of sensory and motor blocks. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in the total analgesia time among the four groups; p=0.11. The pairwise comparison in analgesic time and 99% CI were: control versus clonidine (-1.94 hours (-7.33 to 3.12)), control versus dexamethasone (-4.16 hours (-9.50 to 0.58)) and control versus buprenorphine (-1.1 hours (-5.34 to 3.23)). There was no differences in block set-up time, or total sensory and motor block duration among the groups. CONCLUSION There was no significant improvement in the duration of analgesia with addition of any of the three adjuncts to interscalene blocks. However, there was a larger than expected variability in patient response, hence the study may have been underpowered for the primary outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda S Seering
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Emine O Bayman
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Cynthia A Wong
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Anil A Marian
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bojaxhi E, Lumermann LA, Mazer LS, Howe BL, Ortiguera CJ, Clendenen SR. Interscalene brachial plexus catheter versus single-shot interscalene block with periarticular local infiltration analgesia for shoulder arthroplasty. Minerva Anestesiol 2019; 85:840-845. [DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.19.13387-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
33
|
Hasan SS, Rolf RH, Sympson AN, Eten K, Elsass TR. Single-Shot Versus Continuous Interscalene Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2019; 3:e014. [PMID: 31588420 PMCID: PMC6738550 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-19-00014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Continuous catheter infusion of local anesthetics extends the efficacy of regional anesthesia after prosthetic shoulder surgery. Our purpose was to compare continuous interscalene block (CIB) with single-shot interscalene block, and the hypothesis was these would offer similar safety and efficacy in patients with prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS Seventy-six patients were randomized to ropivacaine single-shot interscalene block or CIB after prosthetic shoulder arthroplasty. Postoperative pain scores and opioid use, hospital length of stay (LOS), adverse events, and catheter tip withdrawal were recorded. RESULTS Pain scores (P = 0.010) and opioid use (P = 0.003) on the first postoperative day were lower in the CIB group, but there was no difference in LOS. Adverse events were more common in the CIB group and 10% of catheters pulled out prematurely. CONCLUSION Opioid use and pain levels during first postoperative day are clinically less after CIB, but this did not shorten LOS. The benefits of CIB may not justify the higher cost and complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer S Hasan
- Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Hasan), MercyHealth/Cincinnati SportsMedicine and Orthopaedic Center; the Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Rolf), Beacon Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine; the TriHealth Hatton Research Institute (Ms. Sympson), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; the Good Samaritan Hospital Orthopedic Center of Excellence (Ms. Eten), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; and the Anesthesiology (Dr. Elsass), Seven Hills Anesthesia, LLC, TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Robert H Rolf
- Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Hasan), MercyHealth/Cincinnati SportsMedicine and Orthopaedic Center; the Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Rolf), Beacon Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine; the TriHealth Hatton Research Institute (Ms. Sympson), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; the Good Samaritan Hospital Orthopedic Center of Excellence (Ms. Eten), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; and the Anesthesiology (Dr. Elsass), Seven Hills Anesthesia, LLC, TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Alexandra N Sympson
- Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Hasan), MercyHealth/Cincinnati SportsMedicine and Orthopaedic Center; the Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Rolf), Beacon Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine; the TriHealth Hatton Research Institute (Ms. Sympson), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; the Good Samaritan Hospital Orthopedic Center of Excellence (Ms. Eten), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; and the Anesthesiology (Dr. Elsass), Seven Hills Anesthesia, LLC, TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Kathryn Eten
- Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Hasan), MercyHealth/Cincinnati SportsMedicine and Orthopaedic Center; the Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Rolf), Beacon Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine; the TriHealth Hatton Research Institute (Ms. Sympson), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; the Good Samaritan Hospital Orthopedic Center of Excellence (Ms. Eten), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; and the Anesthesiology (Dr. Elsass), Seven Hills Anesthesia, LLC, TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Thomas R Elsass
- Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Hasan), MercyHealth/Cincinnati SportsMedicine and Orthopaedic Center; the Orthopaedic Surgery (Dr. Rolf), Beacon Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine; the TriHealth Hatton Research Institute (Ms. Sympson), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; the Good Samaritan Hospital Orthopedic Center of Excellence (Ms. Eten), TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital; and the Anesthesiology (Dr. Elsass), Seven Hills Anesthesia, LLC, TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ardon AE, Prasad A, McClain RL, Melton MS, Nielsen KC, Greengrass R. Regional Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesiologists. Anesthesiol Clin 2019; 37:265-287. [PMID: 31047129 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Proper pain control is critical for ambulatory surgery. Regional anesthesia can decrease postoperative pain, improve patient satisfaction, and expedite patient discharge. This article discusses the techniques, clinical pearls, and potential pitfalls associated with those blocks, which are most useful in an ambulatory perioperative setting. Interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, axillary, paravertebral, erector spinae, pectoralis, serratus anterior, transversus abdominis plane, femoral, adductor canal, popliteal, interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee, and ankle blocks are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto E Ardon
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, USA.
| | - Arun Prasad
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Mc L 2-405, 399, Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Robert Lewis McClain
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - M Stephen Melton
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box #3094, Stop #4, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Karen C Nielsen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box #3094, Stop #4, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Roy Greengrass
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes and discusses the history of continuous catheter blockade (CCB), its current applications, clinical considerations, economic benefits, potential complications, patient education, and best practice techniques. RECENT FINDINGS Regional catheters for outpatient surgery have greatly impacted acute post-operative pain management and recovery. Prior to development, options for acute pain management were limited to the use of opioid pain medications, NSAIDS, neuropathic agents, and the like as local anesthetic duration of action is limited to 4-8 h. Moreover, delivery of opioids post-operatively has been associated with respiratory and central nervous depression, development of opioid use disorder, and many other potential adverse effects. CCB allows for faster recovery time, decreased rates of opioid abuse, and better pain control in patients post-operatively. Outpatient surgical settings continue to focus on efficiency, quality, and safety, including strategies to prevent post-operative nausea, vomiting, and pain. Regional catheters are a valuable tool and help achieve all of the well-established endpoints of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). CCB is growing in popularity with wide indications for a variety of surgeries, and has demonstrated improved patient satisfaction, outcomes, and reductions in many unwanted adverse effects in the outpatient setting.
Collapse
|
36
|
Gendelberg D, Hassenbein S, Kim HM, Adhikary S, Armstrong A. Dry Catheter Technique in Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/2471549218799115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Interscalene regional anesthesia is effective for pain management but is not without complications. To determine whether postoperative neurologic findings were related to the surgery versus the regional catheter, we developed the dry catheter technique where patients could be examined after the surgery prior to dosing the catheter. The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of the dry catheter block in recognizing neurological deficits associated with regional anesthesia. Methods An interscalene catheter was placed but not started. After the surgery, a neurovascular examination was performed. If the examination was normal, the regional anesthesia was started. Throughout the patient’s hospitalization, pain levels were collected. Results A total of 125 shoulders were studied. There were 9 postoperative nerve-related complications. The patients experienced the most pain relief in the first 12 hours. Conclusion The dry catheter technique allows differentiation between complications associated with regional anesthesia versus those associated with the surgery. Although interscalene anesthesia provided effective pain control, we stopped using it because we felt its complication rate was too high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Gendelberg
- Department of Orthopaedics, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan Hassenbein
- Department of Orthopaedics, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - H. Mike Kim
- Department of Orthopaedics, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Sanjib Adhikary
- Department of Anesthesia, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - April Armstrong
- Department of Orthopaedics, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols depend on multidisciplinary care and should be peer-reviewed and data-driven. ERAS has reduced hospital length of stay and complications, simultaneously improving patient outcomes. ERAS protocol after shoulder arthroplasty features multidisciplinary collaboration among different perioperative services and multimodal analgesia with a focus on regional anesthesia. Despite success, adoption is not universal because ERAS protocols are resource intensive. They require clinicians invested in the success of these programs and patients who can take charge of their own health. Future protocols need to include quality of life and functional outcome measures to gauge success from the patient perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taras Grosh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Dulles 680, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Nabil M Elkassabany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Dulles 680, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sah AP, Liang K, Sclafani JA. Optimal Multimodal Analgesia Treatment Recommendations for Total Joint Arthroplasty. JBJS Rev 2018; 6:e7. [DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
39
|
Should continuous rather than single-injection interscalene block be routinely offered for major shoulder surgery? A meta-analysis of the analgesic and side-effects profiles. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120:679-692. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
|
40
|
Abstract
Pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty demands a multidisciplinary approach with collaboration between patients, surgeon, and anesthetist. A multimodal approach with preemptive medication, regional blockade, local anesthetics, and a combination of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, tramadol, and gabapentinoids postoperatively leads to pain control and patient satisfaction. Assessment of patients' expectations constitutes a vital aspect of the preoperative patient evaluation. Educating and psychologically preparing patients reduces postoperative pain. Patients with anxiety and depression, preoperative narcotic use, and medical comorbidities are at an increased risk for suboptimal pain control. Minimizing narcotic use decreases opioid-related adverse effects and facilitates productive rehabilitation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason L Codding
- The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 925 Chestnut Street, 5th floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Charles L Getz
- The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 925 Chestnut Street, 5th floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
Acute pain medicine services influence many different aspects of postoperative recovery and function. Here, we discuss the various stakeholders of an acute pain medicine service, review the direct and indirect impact on said stakeholders, review the shared and competing interests between acute pain medicine programs and various payer systems, and discuss how APM services can help service lines align with the interests of the recent CMS Innovations Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chancellor F Gray
- Division of Adult Arthroplasty and Joint Reconstruction, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation
| | - Cameron Smith
- Division of Acute Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Yury Zasimovich
- Division of Acute Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Patrick J Tighe
- Division of Acute Pain Medicine and Regional Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Guay J, Johnson RL, Kopp S. Nerve blocks or no nerve blocks for pain control after elective hip replacement (arthroplasty) surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 10:CD011608. [PMID: 29087547 PMCID: PMC6485776 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011608.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that over 300,000 total hip replacements are performed each year in the USA. For European countries, the number of hip replacement procedures per 100,000 people performed in 2007 varied from less than 50 to over 250. To facilitate postoperative rehabilitation, pain must be adequately treated. Peripheral nerve blocks and neuraxial blocks have been proposed to replace or supplement systemic analgesia. OBJECTIVES We aimed to compare the relative effects (benefits and harms) of the different nerve blocks that may be used to relieve pain after elective hip replacement in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 12, 2016), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) (1946 to December Week 49, 2016), Embase (Ovid SP) (1980 to December week 49, 2016), CINAHL (EBSCO host) (1982 to 6 December 2016), ISI Web of Science (1973 to 6 December 2016), Scopus (from inception to December 2016), trials registers, and relevant web sites. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in adults undergoing elective primary hip replacement and comparing peripheral nerve blocks to any other pain treatment modality. We applied no language or publication status restrictions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Data were extracted independently by two review authors. We contacted study authors. MAIN RESULTS We included 51 RCTs with 2793 participants; of these 45 RCTs (2491 participants: peripheral nerve block = 1288; comparators = 1203) were included in meta-analyses. There are 11 ongoing studies and three awaiting classification.Compared to systemic analgesia alone, peripheral nerve blocks reduced: pain at rest on arrival in the postoperative care unit (SMD -1.12, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.56; 9 trials, 429 participants; equivalent to 3.2 on 0 to 10 scale; moderate-quality evidence); risk of acute confusional status: risk ratio (RR) 0.10 95% CI 0.02 to 0.54; 1 trial, 225 participants; number needed to treat for additional benefit (NNTB) 12, 95% CI 11 to 22; very low-quality evidence); pruritus (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.70; 2 trials, 259 participants for continuous peripheral nerve blocks; NNTB 4 (95% CI 4 to 8); very low-quality evidence); hospital length of stay (SMD -0.75, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.48; very low-quality evidence; 2 trials, 249 participants; equivalent to 0.75 day). Participant satisfaction increased (SMD 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89; low-quality evidence; 5 trials, 363 participants; equivalent to 2.4 on 0 to 10 scale). We did not find a difference for the number of participants walking on postoperative day one (very low-quality evidence). Two nerve block-related complications were reported: one local haematoma and one delayed persistent paresis.Compared to neuraxial blocks, peripheral nerve blocks reduced the risk of pruritus (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.58; 6 trials, 299 participants; moderate-quality evidence; NNTB 6 (95% CI 5 to 9). We did not find a difference for pain at rest on arrival in the postoperative care unit (moderate-quality evidence); number of nerve block-related complications (low-quality evidence); acute confusional status (very low-quality evidence); hospital length of stay (low quality-evidence); time to first walk (low-quality evidence); or participant satisfaction (high-quality evidence).We found that peripheral nerve blocks provide better pain control compared to systemic analgesia with no major differences between peripheral nerve blocks and neuraxial blocks. We also found that peripheral nerve blocks may be associated with reduced risk of postoperative acute confusional state and a modest reduction in hospital length of stay that could be meaningful in terms of cost reduction considering the increasing numbers of procedures performed annually. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared to systemic analgesia alone, there is moderate-quality evidence that peripheral nerve blocks reduce postoperative pain, low-quality evidence that patient satisfaction is increased and very low-quality evidence for reductions in acute confusional status, pruritus and hospital length of stay .We found moderate-quality evidence that peripheral nerve blocks reduce pruritus compared with neuraxial blocks.The 11 ongoing studies, once completed, and the three studies awaiting classification may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Guay
- University of SherbrookeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of MedicineSherbrookeQuebecCanada
| | - Rebecca L Johnson
- Mayo Clinic College of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine200 First Street SWRochesterMNUSA55905
| | - Sandra Kopp
- Mayo Clinic College of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine200 First Street SWRochesterMNUSA55905
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
A prospective randomized controlled trial to identify the optimal postoperative pain management in shoulder arthroplasty: liposomal bupivacaine versus continuous interscalene catheter. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26:1810-1817. [PMID: 28844420 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Revised: 06/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shoulder arthroplasty is the fastest growing joint replacement surgery in the United States, and optimal postoperative pain management is critical to optimize outcomes for these surgeries. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has gained popularity for its potential to provide extended postoperative pain relief with possibly fewer side effects. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of LB compared with continuous interscalene nerve block (CISB) in terms of postoperative pain control, outpatient pain scores, and patient-reported and functional outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty surgery. METHODS A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial compared consecutive patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty treated with CISB vs. LB with a single bolus interscalene block. The primary outcome measures included pain assessment up to 24 hours after surgery; in addition, all doses and times of narcotics administered during the inpatient stay were recorded. Patient-reported outcome measures for pain, satisfaction, and functional outcomes were recorded postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 70 of 74 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty were included in the study. The LB group had equivalent narcotic use, pain scores, and time to first narcotic rescue compared with the CISB group within the first 24 hours (P > .05). The LB group had higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Penn Shoulder Score at final follow-up. There was an increased number of complications and cost for the CISB group. CONCLUSION This prospective randomized controlled trial demonstrated that LB provides excellent postoperative pain relief for shoulder arthroplasty patients. In addition, LB had fewer complications and lower cost, making it a promising addition to a multimodal pain regimen for shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
|
44
|
Chalmers PN, Salazar D, Fingerman ME, Keener JD, Chamberlain A. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus blockade is associated with reduced length of stay after shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017; 103:847-852. [PMID: 28688963 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 06/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Catheter-delivered continuous interscalene anesthesia has demonstrated improved pain control in randomized clinical trials. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the introduction of continuous catheter anesthesia was associated with a change in length of stay (LOS), readmission, rates of discharge home without home health or nursing services, or opioid administration. We hypothesized that the introduction of continuous catheter anesthesia would be associated with a decrease in LOS, readmission, non-home discharge, and opioid administration. METHODS During 2012, our center transitioned from ultrasound-guided single-dose interscalene regional anesthesia to combined single-dose anesthesia and additional continuous catheter anesthesia over 48-72hours. This retrospective chart review compared primary shoulder arthroplasties with single-dose anesthesia to those with continuous catheter anesthesia, after excluding the learning curve, with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS In total, 1697 patients met criteria, 41% with single-dose anesthesia and 59% with continuous catheter anesthesia. On univariate analysis, the continuous catheter group LOS was 2.2±0.7 day and single-dose group LOS was 2.5±0.8 days (P≤0.001). One day LOS's comprised 1% of the single-dose group and 27% of the continuous catheter group (P<0.001). Anesthesia type remained a significant predictor on multivariate analysis (P<0.001) Readmission at 30 and 90 days (P=0.091 and 0.576), and home discharge (P=0.456) were not different. Opioid administration was higher in the continuous catheter group on univariate analysis (P<0.001), but not on multivariate analysis (P=0.607). CONCLUSION In this retrospective review of 1697 primary shoulder arthroplasties performed at our high-volume, referral center, continuous catheter anesthesia was associated with reduced length of stay when compared to single-dose anesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P N Chalmers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA.
| | - D Salazar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - M E Fingerman
- Regional & Ambulatory Anesthesiology, Washington University Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - J D Keener
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - A Chamberlain
- Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Medical Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Huang Y, Chiu F, Webb CA, Weyker PD. Review of the evidence: best analgesic regimen for shoulder surgery. Pain Manag 2017; 7:405-418. [PMID: 28936915 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2017-0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Multimodal pain management has been advocated in patients experiencing acute pain after surgical procedures due to tissue damage and the subsequent inflammatory response. For patients undergoing shoulder surgeries, studies have definitively shown that interscalene blocks (ISBs) via single-injection or continuous infusion can reduce the total opioid consumption and can lower pain scores after surgery. In some cases, ISBs can be used as the sole anesthetic during shoulder surgeries and spare patients of receiving general anesthesia. However, clinicians should be fully aware of potential pulmonary complications of ISBs and weigh the risk-benefit ratio in patients with limited pulmonary reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Orthopedic & Regional Anesthesia, Columbia University Medical Center
| | - Felicia Chiu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Orthopedic & Regional Anesthesia, Columbia University Medical Center
| | - Christopher Aj Webb
- The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California.,Adjunct Assistant Clinical Professor. Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Care. University of California San Francisco School of Medicine
| | - Paul David Weyker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Divisions of Critical Care, Liver Transplant Anesthesia, Pain Medicine & Regional Anesthesia, Columbia University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Goldberg SF, Pozek JPJ, Schwenk ES, Baratta JL, Beausang DH, Wong AK. Practical Management of a Regional Anesthesia-Driven Acute Pain Service. Adv Anesth 2017; 35:191-211. [PMID: 29103573 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2017.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen F Goldberg
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 8290, Gibbon Building, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - John-Paul J Pozek
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 8290, Gibbon Building, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Eric S Schwenk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 8290, Gibbon Building, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
| | - Jaime L Baratta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 8290, Gibbon Building, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - David H Beausang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 8290, Gibbon Building, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Andrew K Wong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 8290, Gibbon Building, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Neel Desai
- Specialist Registrar in Anaesthetics, Department of Anaesthetics, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Guo C, Ma J, Ma X, Lu B, Wang Y, Tian A, Sun L, Wang Y, Dong B, Teng Y. Supraclavicular block versus interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: A meta-analysis of clinical control trials. Int J Surg 2017; 45:85-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 07/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
49
|
Ding DY, Mahure SA, Mollon B, Shamah SD, Zuckerman JD, Kwon YW. Comparison of general versus isolated regional anesthesia in total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis. J Orthop 2017; 14:417-424. [PMID: 28794581 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2017.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative anesthetic typically consists of either general anesthesia (GA) or isolated regional anesthesia (RA). METHODS A retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis on patients undergoing TSA was performed to determine differences between GA and RA in regard to patient population, complications, LOS and hospital readmission. RESULTS 4158 patients underwent TSA with GA or isolated RA. Propensity-matching resulted in 912 patients in each cohort. RA had lower overall in-hospital complications and greater homebound discharge disposition with lower 90-day readmission rates than GA. CONCLUSION After TSA, isolated RA was associated with lower in-hospital complications, readmission rates and odds of hospital readmission than GA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Y Ding
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, United States
| | - Siddharth A Mahure
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, United States
| | - Brent Mollon
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, United States
| | - Steven D Shamah
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, United States
| | - Joseph D Zuckerman
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, United States
| | - Young W Kwon
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, New York, NY 10003, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abildgaard JT, Lonergan KT, Tolan SJ, Kissenberth MJ, Hawkins RJ, Washburn R, Adams KJ, Long CD, Shealy EC, Motley JR, Tokish JM. Liposomal bupivacaine versus indwelling interscalene nerve block for postoperative pain control in shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26:1175-1181. [PMID: 28479257 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain management strategies following shoulder arthroplasty vary significantly. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is an extended-release delivery of a phospholipid bilayer encapsulating bupivacaine that can result in drug delivery up to 72 hours. Prior studies in lower extremity surgery demonstrated efficacy of LB in comparison to a single-shot peripheral nerve block; however, no study has investigated LB in a total shoulder arthroplasty population. Therefore, this study compared LB vs. an indwelling interscalene nerve block (IINB). METHODS This is a prospective, randomized study of 83 consecutive shoulder arthroplasty patients; 36 patients received LB and a "bridge" of 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 47 patients received an IINB. Postoperative visual analog scale pain levels, opiate consumption measured with oral morphine equivalents, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were recorded. Continuous variables were compared using an analysis of variance with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS Visual analog scale pain scores were statistically higher in the LB cohort immediately postoperatively in the postanesthesia care unit (7.25 vs. 1.91; P = .000) as well as for the remainder of postoperative day 0 (4.99 vs. 3.20; P = .005) but not for the remainder of admission. Opiate consumption was significantly higher among the LB cohort in the postanesthesia care unit (31.79 vs. 7.47; P = .000), on postoperative day 0 (32.64 vs. 15.04; P = .000), and for the total hospital admission (189.50 vs. 91.70, P = .000). Complication numbers and length of stay were not statistically different. CONCLUSION Use of an IINB provides superior pain management in the immediate postoperative setting as demonstrated by decreased narcotic medication consumption and lower subjective pain scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey T Abildgaard
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Keith T Lonergan
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Stefan J Tolan
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Michael J Kissenberth
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Richard J Hawkins
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Richard Washburn
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jay R Motley
- Department of Anesthesiology, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - John M Tokish
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville Health System, Greenville, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|