Early psychological stress after forearm nerve injuries: a predictor for long-term functional outcome and return to productivity

Comparison of Functionality Level, Disability and Quality of Life in Subjects with Peripheral Nerve Repair in the Upper Extremity

Background

Peripheral nerve damage is a very important factor in patients' quality of life and functionality for various reasons. We aimed to compare the functionality level, disability and quality of life in subjects with peripheral nerve repair in the upper extremity.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with nerve injuries in 2019. Among those patients, Eighty-five were selected as the sample. The instruments used in this study included the health-related quality of life standard questionnaire (SF-36), and the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-38). Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 22 and one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests.

Results

Results of the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the disability score in the groups of patients was not significant. In addition, according to the results of the one-way ANOVA test, the quality of life score was not significant among the patient groups.

Conclusion

Considering that peripheral nerve damage has a significant impact on patients' quality of life and functionality, apart from more research on the subject, it is necessary to provide support for patients to improve their quality of life.

Preinjury Social Determinants of Health Disparities Predict Postinjury Psychosocial Conditions in Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries

BACKGROUND

Adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries (TBPIs) are life-altering events that can have detrimental effects on a patient's quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To examine how social determinants of health (SDOH) disparities influence the risk of developing new psychosocial conditions after TBPIs in previously psychiatric-naïve patients.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and June 2019, a retrospective analysis was performed using PearlDiver's Mariner, an all-payer claims database, to create 3 cohorts: TBPI disparity cohort: patients with TBPI and presence of at least 1 SDOH disparity before injury, TBPI without disparity cohort: patients with TBPI and the absence of any SDOH disparity, and control cohort: patients without TBPIs.

RESULTS

The matched population analyzed in this study consisted of 1176 patients who were equally represented in the TBPI disparity cohort (n = 392, 33.33%), TBPI without disparity cohort (n = 392, 33.33%), and control cohort (n = 392, 33.33%). A total of 301 patients developed any psychosocial condition with 4 years of their injury. Patients in the TBPI disparity cohort had significantly higher rates of developing any psychosocial condition (31.12%, P < .0005), depression (22.70%, P = .0032), anxiety (18.62%, P = .0203), drug abuse (7.91%, P = .0060), and alcohol abuse (4.85%, P = .03499) when compared with the other cohorts. Furthermore, the disparity cohort carried a significantly increased risk of developing any psychosocial condition (hazard ratio 1.42, 95% CI 1.09-1.86). The rates of suicide attempt, post-traumatic stress disorder, and divorce did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

TBPI patients with SDOH disparities are at increased risk of developing new-onset psychosocial conditions, such as depression, anxiety, drug abuse, and alcohol abuse. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III.

Factors affecting orthosis adherence after acute traumatic hand tendon repairs: A prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Custom-made orthoses are used to prevent contractures and reinjury of tissues such as tendon rupture after traumatic tendon repairs. Despite their wide usage in hand rehabilitation, orthosis adherence is usually an overlooked problem.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study aims to evaluate the possible factors affecting the orthosis adherence in patients with acute traumatic tendon repairs.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Two hundred twelve patients with acute traumatic hand tendon repair were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated on the third day postoperatively and at three weeks. All patients were told to wear their orthosis 24 h a day for three weeks and allowed to take it off to wash the hand carefully once a day. Adherence was measured as fully adherent, partially adherent, and nonadherent. Factors that may affect orthosis adherence were evaluated according to the five dimensions of the multidimensional adherence model including socioeconomic, condition-related, treatment-related, patient-related, and health-care system-related factors. The Modified Hand Injury Severity Scale was used to assess the severity of the injury. Depression and anxiety symptoms were evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed for orthosis adherence.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three patients were analyzed. Forty-four (33.1%) patients were fully adherent with the prescribed orthosis, whereas 67 (50.4%) were partially adherent and 22 (16.5%) were nonadherent. Higher depression symptoms caused orthosis nonadherence [odds ratio = 1.2 (95% confidence interval = 1.1-1.3), P = .001] and partial adherence [odds ratio = 1.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.0-1.2), P = .01].

CONCLUSIONS

Among our patients with acute traumatic tendon repair, only one-third of the patients were fully adherent with the orthosis wear program. Depression in the very acute period of injury impaired orthosis adherence.

Quality of Life and Psychosocial Factors as Predictors of Pain Relief Following Nerve Surgery

Background: Peripheral nerve injuries may result in pain, disability, and decreased quality of life (QoL). Pain is an incompletely understood experience and is associated with emotional and behavioral qualities. We hypothesized that pain following peripheral nerve surgery could be predicted by changes in emotions or QoL postoperatively. Methods: Using prospectively collected data, a retrospective study design was used to evaluate the relationships among pain, QoL, and psychosocial factors in patients who underwent peripheral nerve surgery. Patients completed questionnaires rating pain; impact of pain on QoL, sadness, depression, frustration, anger, and hopefulness before surgery; and each postoperative follow-up visit. Multilevel modeling was used to assess the concurrent and lagged relationships between pain and psychosocial factors. Results: Increased pain was concurrently associated with decreased hopefulness (P = .001) and increased the impact on QoL, sadness, depression, and anger (P < .001). In lagged analyses, the impact on QoL and anger prospectively predicted pain (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively). Pain predicted subsequent scores of QoL, sadness, depression, anger, and hopefulness (P < .01). Having an upper limb nerve injury and self-report of "no comment for childhood trauma" were predictors of postsurgical pain. Conclusion: Psychosocial measures and pain are reciprocally related among patients who underwent surgery for peripheral nerve injuries or compression. Our study provides evidence of the important relationships among psychosocial factors, pain, and outcome and identifies treatment targets following nerve surgery.

Predictors of functional outcome after peripheral nerve injury and compression

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION

Upper-extremity peripheral nerve injuries can impact long-term pain, work performance, and disability, yet there are few studies evaluating treatment outcomes for a large sample of patients with varying peripheral nerve pathology.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to identify outcomes of care and predictors of disability and health status in adults with peripheral nerve injuries.

METHODS

We explored medical records from 364 patients treated by a plastic surgeon over a three-year period. Descriptive and inferential statistics compared the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Short-Form 8, and routine intake data between baseline and discharge, diagnosis, and intervention group. Multivariate linear regression models predicted disability, work disability, and physical and mental health at discharge.

RESULTS

We found significant improvements in disability, work disability, pain, depression, and stress. Health status changed minimally. Disability decreased most in patients who were working and who had symptoms fewer than six months. Outcomes were not statistically different between surgical and nonsurgical patients. Disability was the highest in patients with brachial plexus injuries. Multivariate models predicted 35 to 55% of the variance in the outcome measures. Factors that were highly predictive of functional outcomes included work status, household management, pain, depression, stress, and difficulty sleeping.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with peripheral nerve injuries experience improved pain and disability whether treated surgically or nonsurgically. Maintaining engagement in meaningful home and work roles may improve outcomes. Helping patients manage pain remains important, along with combatting stress, depression, and sleep deprivation.

Beyond the Knife-Reviewing the Interplay of Psychosocial Factors and Peripheral Nerve Lesions

Peripheral nerve injuries are a common clinical problem. They not only affect the physical capabilities of the injured person due to loss of motor or sensory function but also have a significant impact on psychosocial aspects of life. The aim of this work is to review the interplay of psychosocial factors and peripheral nerve lesions. By reviewing the published literature, we identified several factors to be heavily influenced by peripheral nerve lesions. In addition to psychological factors like pain, depression, catastrophizing and stress, social factors like employment status and worker's compensation status could be identified to be influenced by peripheral nerve lesions as well as serving as predictors of functional outcome themselves, respectively. This work sheds a light not only on the impact of peripheral nerve lesions on psychosocial aspects of life, but also on the prognostic values of these factors of functional outcome. Interdisciplinary, individualized treatment of patients is required to identify patient at risk for adverse outcomes and provide them with emotional support when adapting to their new life situation.

Factors Associated with a Recommendation for Operative Treatment for Fracture of the Distal Radius

Background  Evidence suggests that there is substantial and unexplained surgeon-to-surgeon variation in recommendation of operative treatment for fractures of the distal radius. We studied (1) what factors are associated with recommendation for operative treatment of a fracture of the distal radius and (2) which factors are rated as the most influential on recommendation of operative treatment. Methods  One-hundred thirty-one upper extremity and fracture surgeons evaluated 20 fictitious patient scenarios with randomly assigned factors (e.g., personal, clinical, and radiologic factors) for patients with a fracture of the distal radius. They addressed the following questions: (1) Do you recommend operative treatment for this patient (yes/no)? We determined the influence of each factor on this recommendation using random forest algorithms. Also, participants rated the influence of each factor-excluding age and sex- on a scale from 0 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important). Results  Random forest algorithms determined that age and angulation were having the most influence on recommendation for operative treatment of a fracture of the distal radius. Angulation on the lateral radiograph and presence or absence of lunate subluxation were rated as having the greatest influence and smoking status and stress levels the lowest influence on advice to patients. Conclusions  The observation that-other than age-personal factors have limited influence on surgeon recommendations for surgery may reflect how surgeon cognitive biases, personal preferences, different perspectives, and incentives may contribute to variations in care. Future research can determine whether decision aids-those that use patient-specific probabilities based on predictive analytics in particular-might help match patient treatment choices to what matters most to them, in part by helping to neutralize the influence of common misconceptions as well as surgeon bias and incentives. Level of Evidence  There is no level of evidence for the study.

Anxiety Symptoms After Orthopedic Injury: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Millions of Americans are injured each year, with 75% suffering orthopedic injuries. Those with orthopedic injury often experience postinjury symptoms, such as anxiety, that negatively influence long-term outcomes. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate (1) the prevalence of anxiety symptoms chronologically in relation to time of orthopedic injury, (2) the associations of anxiety symptoms with other symptoms in individuals with orthopedic injury, and (3) the associations between anxiety symptoms and functional performance and mental health outcomes in individuals with orthopedic injury.

METHODS

The databases CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid PsycInfo, Ovid Embase, ProQuest, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on June 25, 2020. Studies were selected for review if (1) participants were 16 years or older, (2) the prevalence of anxiety symptoms was listed, (3) anxiety symptoms were assessed using a validated instrument, (4) the study was published in English, and (5) more than 50% of the participants suffered orthopedic injury to the appendicular skeleton or pelvic ring.

RESULTS

Anxiety symptoms were present in 11.5%-55.9% of individuals up to 10 years after orthopedic injury and often co-occurred with those of depression, pain, and posttraumatic stress disorder to negatively influence functional performance and mental health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Anxiety symptoms post-orthopedic injury are highly prevalent and persistent. Anxiety symptoms are associated with other distressing symptoms and influence long-term outcomes. These findings highlight the need to screen for and treat anxiety symptoms following orthopedic injury and may help in designing future self-management interventions.

Outcomes and Return to Work Following Complex Nerve Lacerations in the Volar Forearm in an Underserved Spanish-Speaking Population

Purpose

Lacerations to the ulnar and median nerve in the volar forearm have demonstrated considerable long-term clinical and socioeconomic impacts on patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of complex volar forearm lacerations involving one or more major peripheral nerves in an economically disadvantaged patient population.

Methods

In this study, a retrospective analysis of 61 patients who sustained lacerations to the median nerve, ulnar nerve, or both with volar wrist lacerations was performed. Each patient’s preinjury and postinjury occupation, dominant extremity, and demographic variables were evaluated. Sensation recovery, motor recovery, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, visual analog scale scores, cold intolerance, and return to work were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after the injury.

Results

Patients with isolated median nerve injuries demonstrated improved motor recovery compared with patients with isolated ulnar nerve injuries. Patients with combined nerve injuries had worse sensation recovery and motor recovery, and lower rates of return to work than either group of patients with isolated nerve injuries. Manual laborers had worse motor recovery and lower rates of return to work than did patients who were office workers.

Conclusions

Patients with combined median and ulnar nerve injuries have worse functional recovery and lower rates of return to work than do patients with isolated median or isolated ulnar nerve injuries at 1 year. Manual laborers demonstrated worse functional recovery and lower rates of return to work compared with office workers at 1 year.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Patients' views on early sensory relearning following nerve repair-a Q-methodology study

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION

Early sensory relearning where the dynamic capacity of the brain is used has been shown to improve sensory outcome after nerve repair. However, no previous studies have examined how patients experience early sensory relearning.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To describe patient's views on early sensory relearning.

METHODS

Statements' scores were analyzed by factor analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven consecutive adult patients with median and/or ulnar nerve repair who completed early sensory relearning were included. Three factors were identified, explaining 45% of the variance: (1) "Believe sensory relearning is meaningful, manage to get an illusion of touch and complete the sensory relearning"; (2) "Do not get an illusion of touch easily and need support in their sensory relearning" (3) "Are not motivated, manage to get an illusion of touch but do not complete sensory relearning".

DISCUSSION

Many patients succeed in implementing their sensory relearning. However, a substantial part of the patient population need more support, have difficulties to create illusion of touch, and lack motivation to complete the sensory relearning. To enhance motivation and meaningfulness by relating the training clearly to everyday occupations and to the patient's life situation is a suggested way to proceed.

CONCLUSION

The three unique factors indicate motivation and sense of meaningfulness as key components which should be taken into consideration in developing programs for person-centered early sensory relearning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

A Population-Based Assessment of Depression and Anxiety in Patients With Brachial Plexus Injuries

PURPOSE

Reactive depression and anxiety are common after major life changes such as brachial plexus injuries (BPI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for coded depression and coded anxiety among patients with BPI using a national database of commercial insurance claims.

METHODS

We used the Truven MarketScan database from 2007 to 2013 to identify commercially insured patients aged 18 to 64 years who underwent BPI surgery. For comparison, a control group without BPI was frequency-matched 10:1 by age group, sex, number of provider visits, and length of insurance enrollment. Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes and pharmacy claims, we identified coded depression and coded anxiety in the 12 months before and 12 months after BPI surgery. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine risk factors for coded depression or coded anxiety, adjusting for known risk factors for depression or anxiety (eg, alcohol, substance abuse).

RESULTS

We identified 1,843 patients with BPI and 18,430 controls. Within the 12 months preceding surgery, coded depression and coded anxiety were present in 38% and 42%, respectively, of the BPI group; both were present in 25% and either was present in 54%. The rate of new-onset/postoperatively coded depression among patients with BPI was 142.1/1,000 person-years (12%) and of new-onset/postoperatively coded anxiety was 273.6/1,000 person-years (20%). Patients with BPI were significantly more likely than controls to develop new-onset/postoperatively coded depression (hazard ratio = 1.3; confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.5) and new-onset/postoperatively coded anxiety (HR = 2.1 [CI, 1.8-2.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing BPI surgery have a high prevalence of coded depression and coded anxiety in the 12 months before surgery and are at higher risk for developing new-onset/postoperatively coded depression and coded anxiety within 1 year after surgery. These findings can be used by BPI surgeons to inform perioperative counseling, guide emotional recovery from injury, and facilitate coordinated or colocated care with mental health professionals.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

Atypical sensory processing pattern following median or ulnar nerve injury - a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Due to brain plasticity a transection of a median or ulnar nerve results in profound changes in the somatosensory areas in the brain. The permanent sensory deprivation after a peripheral nerve injury might influence the interaction between all senses. The aim of the study was to investigate if a median and/or ulnar nerve injury gives rise to a changed sensory processing pattern. In addition we examined if age at injury, injured nerve or time since injury influence the sensory processing pattern.

METHODS

Fifty patients (40 men and 10 women, median age 43) operated due to a median and/or ulnar nerve injury were included. The patients completed the Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile questionnaire, which includes a comprehensive characterization on how sensory information is processed and how an individual responds to multiple sensory modalities. AASP categorizes the results into four possible Quadrants of behavioral profiles (Q1-low registration, Q2-sensory seeking, Q3-sensory sensitivity and Q4-sensory avoiding). The results were compared to 209 healthy age and gender matched controls. Anova Matched Design was used for evaluation of differences between the patient group and the control group. Atypical sensory processing behavior was determined in relation to the normative distribution of the control group.

RESULTS

Significant difference was seen in Q1, low registration. 40% in the patient group scored atypically in this Quadrant compared to 16% of the controls. No correlation between atypical sensory processing pattern and age or time since injury was seen.

CONCLUSION

A peripheral nerve injury entails altered sensory processing pattern with increased proportion of patients with low registration to sensory stimulus overall. Our results can guide us into more client centered rehabilitation strategies.

The impact of psychological factors on recovery from injury: a multicentre cohort study

PURPOSE

Unintentional injuries have a significant long-term health impact in working age adults. Depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder are common post-injury, but their impact on self-reported recovery has not been investigated in general injury populations. This study investigated the role of psychological predictors 1 month post-injury in subsequent self-reported recovery from injury in working-aged adults.

METHODS

A multicentre cohort study was conducted of 668 unintentionally injured adults admitted to five UK hospitals followed up at 1, 2, 4 and 12 months post-injury. Logistic regression explored relationships between psychological morbidity 1 month post-injury and self-reported recovery 12 months post-injury, adjusting for health, demographic, injury and socio-legal factors. Multiple imputations were used to impute missing values.

RESULTS

A total of 668 adults participated at baseline, 77% followed up at 1 month and 63% at 12 months, of whom 383 (57%) were included in the main analysis. Multiple imputation analysis included all 668 participants. Increasing levels of depression scores and increasing levels of pain at 1 month and an increasing number of nights in hospital were associated with significantly reduced odds of recovery at 12 months, adjusting for age, sex, centre, employment and deprivation. The findings were similar in the multiple imputation analysis, except that pain had borderline statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression 1 month post-injury is an important predictor of recovery, but other factors, especially pain and nights spent in hospital, also predict recovery. Identifying and managing depression and providing adequate pain control are essential in clinical care post-injury.

Psychological consequences of traumatic upper limb peripheral nerve injury: A systematic review

Introduction

Traumatic upper limb peripheral nerve injuries significantly impact individuals’ function and ability to return to work. Patients with peripheral nerve injury experience ongoing psychological impairments for which they are not routinely treated. The aim of this review was to investigate the psychological consequences of traumatic upper limb peripheral nerve injury.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED, BNI, the Cochrane libraries and grey literature up to October 2015 was undertaken. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Eligibility criteria comprised: adults or adolescents with traumatic upper limb peripheral nerve injury using any measurement of psychological well-being.

Results

Six studies ( n = 245) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality varied widely. Evidence of post-traumatic stress disorder at one month, which decreased over time, was reported in three studies. Two studies found a statistically significant correlation between the early presence of post-traumatic stress disorder and reduction in function at 12 or more months. Limited information was available on anxiety, depression and mental quality of life. Combined nerve injuries (in two studies) had significantly higher levels of post-traumatic stress disorder, at one month, compared to those with an isolated nerve injury.

Conclusion

There is some evidence of early post-traumatic stress disorder following traumatic upper limb peripheral nerve injury, which may have an impact on functional outcome. However, high-quality studies using prospective cohorts are required to further evaluate the psychological aspects associated with this traumatic injury.

Pain, Disability in Daily Activities and Work Participation in Patients with Traumatic Hand Injury

Traumatic hand injuries are represented in a large proportion of the patients treated at the out-patient department of occupational therapy in the VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam. Most of the patients are referred to occupational therapy by specialists in the hospital. Information about the course of traumatic hand injuries regarding performance of daily activities is still limited. Research, focused on problems experienced by patients with hand injuries, may contribute to a better understanding of the course and rehabilitation of traumatic hand injuries.

This article is a report of a cross-sectional observational study with the objective to:

1) describe the impact of traumatic injuries of the hand on daily activities and work participation six months after injury

2) to analyse the impact of demographic characteristics and type and severity of the injury on pain and ability to perform daily activities, and

3) to analyse the impact of demographic characteristics and type and severity of the injury on work participation and time off work (TOW).

Fifty-eight patients completed a questionnaire six months after injury. The Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was used to evaluate disability in daily activities. A Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used to evaluate pain. Patients showed a mean DASH score of 22.5 (±19.3). The experience of pain and ethnicity were predictors of disability (p<0.001). The average TOW was 10.3 weeks (± 8.3). There was a significant difference (p=0.005) in TOW between Dutch patients (7.6 ± 5.8) and patients of another ethnicity (20.0 ± 8.9). Despite the reported disabilities in performing daily activities, almost all patients (91%) returned to their occupations within six months after hand injury. It is suggested that, for optimal rehabilitation, it may be necessary to focus more attention on the cultural background of the patients and the problems experienced in daily activities. Integration of evaluative instruments in hand therapy practice is advocated to guide therapy sessions, to measure outcome and to anticipate long-term problems in daily activities in an early stage of treatment.

Enhanced early sensory outcome after nerve repair as a result of immediate post-operative re-learning: a randomized controlled trial

We assessed the use of guided plasticity training to improve the outcome in the first 6 months after nerve repair. In a multicentre randomized controlled trial, 37 adults with median or ulnar nerve repair at the distal forearm were randomized to intervention, starting the first week after surgery with sensory and motor re-learning using mirror visual feedback and observation of touch, or to a control group with re-learning starting when reinnervation could be detected. The primary outcome at 3 and 6 months post-operatively was discriminative touch (shape texture identification test, part of the Rosen score). At 6 months, discriminative touch was significantly better in the early intervention group. Improvement of discriminative touch between 3 and 6 months was also significantly greater in that group. There were no significant differences in motor function, pain or in the total score. We conclude that early re-learning using guided plasticity may have a potential to improve the outcomes after nerve repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.

Imaging assessment of gunshot wounds

Gunshot injuries occur when someone is shot by a bullet or other sort of projectile from a firearm. Wounds are generally classified as low velocity (less than 609.6m/s) or high velocity (more than 609.6m/s). Those with higher velocity may be expected, on this basis, to dissipate more energy into surrounding tissue as they are slow and cause more tissue damage, but this is only a very approximate guide. However, these terms can be misleading; more important than velocity is the efficiency of energy transfer, which is dependent on the physical characteristics of the projectile, as well as the kinetic energy, stability, entrance profile and path traveled through the body, and the biological characteristics of the tissues injured. Hemodynamically stable patients and patients who stabilized after simple immediate resuscitation were evaluated with a careful history and physical examination. A routine x-ray is performed in patients with gunshot wounds. Indication for total body computed tomography (CT) is based on the presence of signs and symptoms of vascular damage at clinical examination. Patients are immediately transferred in the operating room for surgery if more serious injuries that require immediate surgical care are not diagnosed, or hemostasis may be preliminary reached in the emergency room. Hemodynamically stable patients with no history and clinical examination showing suspected vascular damage are allowed in the radiology department for obtaining a total body CT scan with intravenous contrast medium and then transferred to the surgical ward trauma for observation. After 24 hours without the complications, patient can be discharged. CT is the procedure of choice to identify hemorrhage, air, bullet, bone fragments, hemothorax, nerve lesion, musculoskeletal lesions, and vessels injuries and is useful for assessing medicolegal aspects as trajectory and the anatomical structures at risk.

Factors predicting sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the factors associated with sensory and motor recovery after the repair of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries.

DATA SOURCES:

The online PubMed database was searched for English articles describing outcomes after the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries in humans with a publication date between 1 January 1990 and 16 February 2011.

STUDY SELECTION:

The following types of article were selected: (1) clinical trials describing the repair of median, ulnar, radial, and digital nerve injuries published in English; and (2) studies that reported sufficient patient information, including age, mechanism of injury, nerve injured, injury location, defect length, repair time, repair method, and repair materials. SPSS 13.0 software was used to perform univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and to investigate the patient and intervention factors associated with outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Sensory function was assessed using the Mackinnon-Dellon scale and motor function was assessed using the manual muscle test. Satisfactory motor recovery was defined as grade M4 or M5, and satisfactory sensory recovery was defined as grade S3⁺ or S4.

RESULTS:

Seventy-one articles were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that repair time, repair materials, and nerve injured were independent predictors of outcome after the repair of nerve injuries (P < 0.05), and that the nerve injured was the main factor affecting the rate of good to excellent recovery.

CONCLUSION:

Predictors of outcome after the repair of peripheral nerve injuries include age, gender, repair time, repair materials, nerve injured, defect length, and duration of follow-up.

How well do we report on compensation systems in studies of return to work: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Occupational injury and work-related disability is a significant public health problem. For published research to provide a collective knowledge base for return to work (RTW) policy and practice, features of the compensation system relevant to the research must be described clearly. The level of the reporting on compensation system features is yet to be established. The aim of the present study was to synthesize the evidence for the reporting on compensation systems in prognostic studies of RTW following work-related injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Ovid Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published 1996-2011. Included studies were prognostic studies of RTW or work disability following work-related acute traumatic injuries.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 952 articles; 37 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were based on clinical practice; eight studies were based on administrative data. Only two studies reported seven or more compensation features and two studies reported four to six. The majority of studies (19/37) did not report on any aspect of the compensation system that study participants were interacting with. The most common information reported was the extent of coverage at the population level (7/37) and the availability of wage replacement entitlements (7/37). The name of the compensation system was provided in 5 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall reporting on compensation systems in prognostic studies of RTW needs to be improved if research evidence is to inform policy and practice. Compensation system features that could be reported are provided.

The correlation of neurophysiological findings with clinical and functional status in patients following traumatic nerve injury

In this study, we aimed to determine whether there is a correlation between the electrodiagnostic findings and the functional status, muscle strength and sensibility in patients with traumatic nerve injury to the wrists. We assessed 50 patients at a mean of 11.6 months (SD 5.85) (range 6-25) after nerve injury. Sensibility was assessed by monofilament testing. Motor function was evaluated by assessing the manual muscle grade of the abductor pollicis brevis and abductor digiti minimi muscles. Function was evaluated by the Sollerman Hand Function Test. The amplitudes of the compound muscle action potential and the sensory nerve action potential were determined by electroneuromyography. While the compound muscle action potential and sensory nerve action potential amplitudes had significant correlation with muscle grade and Semmes Weinstein Monofilament tests, there was no correlation with the functional scores.

Consequences and adaptation in daily life - patients' experiences three decades after a nerve injury sustained in adolescence

Background

To explore the patients’ experiences during the three decades following repair of a nerve injury in the forearm and its consequences for daily life. Strategies that were used to facilitate adaptation were also investigated.

Methods

Fifteen participants with a complete median and/or ulnar nerve injury repaired in the ages from 13–20 years were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. The median follow-up time was 31 years (range 23–40). The participants were asked to describe the past and present symptoms of the injured hand, the consequences of the injury for daily life, personal qualities and support from others. In addition, they were asked to describe strategies used to facilitate adaptation. The interviews were subjected to content analysis.

Results

The nerve injury lead to sensory and motor deficits in the injured hand, as well as sensitivity to cold and secondary back problems. Emotional reactions to trauma and symptoms related to post-traumatic stress disorder were described, as well as how they managed to cope with such reactions. There was a noticeable impact on education, leisure, professional or domestic life for some, while others could continue by changing e.g. their performance pattern. The participants’ life roles and relations were also affected. Both emotion- and problem-based strategies were used to manage challenges in daily life.

Conclusions

The present qualitative study can help us to provide the patient with honest and realistic information about what to expect after a nerve injury at forearm level, without eliminating hope. Emotional reactions to trauma should be identified and dealt with. In addition, health-care professionals can promote a variety of coping mechanisms to facilitate daily living for the injured patients.

Sensory recovery outcome after digital nerve repair in relation to different reconstructive techniques: meta-analysis and systematic review

Good clinical outcome after digital nerve repair is highly relevant for proper hand function and has a significant socioeconomic impact. However, level of evidence for competing surgical techniques is low. The aim is to summarize and compare the outcomes of digital nerve repair with different methods (end-to-end and end-to-side coaptations, nerve grafts, artificial conduit-, vein-, muscle, and muscle-in-vein reconstructions, and replantations) to provide an aid for choosing an individual technique of nerve reconstruction and to create reference values of standard repair for nonrandomized clinical studies. 87 publications including 2,997 nerve repairs were suitable for a precise evaluation. For digital nerve repairs there was practically no particular technique superior to another. Only end-to-side coaptation had an inferior two-point discrimination in comparison to end-to-end coaptation or nerve grafting. Furthermore, this meta-analysis showed that youth was associated with an improved sensory recovery outcome in patients who underwent digital replantation. For end-to-end coaptations, recent publications had significantly better sensory recovery outcomes than older ones. Given minor differences in outcome, the main criteria in choosing an adequate surgical technique should be gap length and donor site morbidity caused by graft material harvesting. Our clinical experience was used to provide a decision tree for digital nerve repair.

Treatment of penetrating trauma of the extremities: ten years' experience at a Dutch level 1 trauma center

Background

A selective non-operative management (SNOM) has found to be an adequate and safe strategy to assess and treat patients suffering from penetrating trauma of the extremities (PTE). With this SNOM comes a strategy in which adjuvant investigations or interventions are not routinely performed, but based on physical examination only.

Methods

All subsequent patients presented with PTE at a Dutch level I trauma center from October 2000 to June 2011 were included in this study. In-hospital and long-term outcome was analysed in the light of assessment of these patients according to the SNOM protocol.

Results

A total of 668 patients (88.2% male; 33.8% gunshot wounds) with PTE presented at the Emergency Department of a level 1 traumacenter, of whom 156 were admitted for surgical treatment or observation. Overall, 22 (14%) patients that were admitted underwent exploration of the extremity for vascular injury. After conservative observation, two (1.5%) patients needed an intervention to treat (late onset) vascular complications. Other long-term extremity related complications were loss of function or other deformity (n = 9) due to missed nerve injury, including 2 patients with peroneal nerve injury caused by delayed compartment syndrome treatment.

Conclusion

A SNOM protocol for initial assessment and treatment of PTE is feasible and safe. Clinical examination of the injured extremity is a reliable diagnostic 'tool' for excluding vascular injury. Repeated assessments for nerve injuries are important as these are the ones that are frequently missed and result in long-term disability. Level of evidence: II / III, retrospective prognostic observational cohort study Key words Penetrating trauma, extremity, vascular injury, complications.

The presence and impact of stress reactions on disability among patients with arm injury

This study explores the prevalence and types of stress reactions and their impact on self-perceived disability among arm-hand-injured patients. It tested the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between stress reactions after traumatic hand injury and arm-specific disability. In a prospective cohort of 24 patients, stress reactions were measured using the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R), and arm-specific disability was measured using the QuickDASH, an average of 7.5 months (range: 1.5-33 months) after injury. Type of injury, length of time since injury, and gender did not influence scores on the IES-R or the QuickDASH. The IES-R subscales of intrusion and hyperarousal correlated with QuickDASH scores (intrusion: r=0.57, p=0.004; hyperarousal: r=0.45, p=0.029). These findings suggest that the patient may require attention to learn how to engage in the therapy process while experiencing stress reactions.

A systematic review of early prognostic factors for return to work following acute orthopaedic trauma

INTRODUCTION

Acute orthopaedic trauma is a major contributor to the global burden of disease. This study aims to synthesise and summarise current knowledge concerning prognostic factors for return to work and duration of work disability following acute orthopaedic trauma.

METHODS

A systematic review of prognostic studies was performed. The Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL and AMED electronic databases were searched for studies between 1985 and May 2009. Included studies were longitudinal, reported results with multivariate statistical analyses appropriate to prognostic studies, comprised persons employed at the time of the injury, included prognostic factors measured proximal to the injury and focused on upper and lower extremity injuries.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 980 studies of which 15 met the inclusion criteria and were rated for methodological quality. Analysis focused on the 14 factors considered in more than one study. There was limited evidence for the role of any factor as a predictor of return to work. There is strong evidence for level of education and blue collar work and moderate evidence for self-efficacy, injury severity and compensation as prognostic factors for the duration of work disability. Significant methodological issues were encountered in the course of the review that limited interpretation of the evidence and the conclusions that could be drawn from the findings.

CONCLUSION

People who have sustained acute orthopaedic trauma regardless of severity experience difficulties in returning to work. Due to the lack of factors considered in more than one cohort, the results of this review are inconclusive. The review highlights the need for more prospective studies that are methodologically rigorous, have larger sample sizes and considers a comprehensive range of factors.

Effect of upper extremity nerve damage on activity participation, pain, depression, and quality of life

PURPOSE

To explore the relationship between upper extremity nerve damage and activity participation, pain, depression, and perceived quality of life.

METHODS

A total of 49 patients with upper extremity nerve damage completed standardized measures of activity participation, pain, depression, and quality of life. We analyzed scores for all subjects and for 2 diagnostic groups: patients with compressive neuropathy and patients with nerve injury (laceration, tumor, and brachial plexus injury), and explored predictors of overall quality of life.

RESULTS

Participants had given up 21% of their previous daily activities; greater activity loss was reported in patients with nerve injury. Pain was moderate and 39% had signs of clinical depression. Physical and psychological quality of life ratings were below the norms. Activity loss was strongly associated with higher levels of depression and lower physical and psychological quality of life. Higher depression scores correlated strongly with lower overall quality of life. Greater pain correlated moderately with higher depression scores and weakly with quality of life; no statistical relationship was found between pain and physical quality of life. Activity participation and depression predicted 61% of the variance in overall quality of life in patients with nerve damage.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that hand surgeons and therapists caring for patients with nerve compression and nerve injury should discuss strategies to improve activity participation, and decrease pain and depression, to improve overall effect on quality of life throughout the recovery process. Depression screening and referral when indicated should be included in the overall treatment plan for patients with upper extremity nerve damage.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Application of infrared thermography for the analysis of rewarming in patients with cold intolerance

Cold intolerance is a serious long-term problem after injury to the ulnar and median nerves, and its pathophysiology is unclear. We investigated the use of infrared thermography for the analysis of thermoregulation after injury to peripheral nerves. Four patients with injuries to the ulnar nerve and four with injuries to the median nerve (4-12 years after injury) immersed their hands in water at 15 degrees C for 5 minutes, after which infrared pictures were taken at intervals of 2-4 minutes. The areas supplied by the injured nerves could be identified easily in the patients with symptoms of cold intolerance. At baseline temperature distribution of the hand was symmetrical, but after testing the injured side warmed up much slower. We concluded that the infrared profile of the temperature of the hand after immersion in cold water is helpful to assess thermoregulation after injury to peripheral nerves.

Impairment and disability after severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures

PURPOSE

Upper-extremity impairment evaluation is performed mostly by using guidelines provided by the American Medical Association (AMA). Recently, subjective disability tests, such as the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, have been developed that appreciate the limitations patients experience in everyday life. In this study, the correlation between impairment and disability was assessed after treatment for severe hand injuries with multiple phalangeal fractures, with adjustment for comorbidity and follow-up duration.

METHODS

The functional recovery of patients suffering severe hand trauma was evaluated using AMA impairment rating tests and DASH disability questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients with 228 phalangeal fractures were available for testing, with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years. No statistically significant correlation existed between the AMA impairment ratings for the hand and the DASH module scores. There were weak correlations between the AMA impairment ratings for the arm and total body and the DASH module function scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of a strong correlation emphasizes the clear distinction between impairment and disability. The inclusion of disability outcome measures in the evaluation of hand trauma regimens might help to expand the clinician's view to more individualized, activity-of-daily-living-oriented, treatment regimens.

Difference in Recovery Potential of Peripheral Nerves after Graft Repairs

OBJECTIVE:

To our knowledge, few studies have been published regarding differences in nerve recovery potentials. In this study, sensory and motor recovery potentials were compared between different nerves.

METHODS:

A prospective study of a homogenous group of 393 graft repairs of the median, ulnar, radial, tibial, peroneal, femoral, and musculocutaneous nerves, with the scoring of motor and sensory recoveries. Sensory and motor recovery potentials, defined on the basis of average scores and rates of useful recovery, were compared between the different nerves, and separately for high-, intermediate-, and low-level repairs.

RESULTS:

Sensory recovery potential was similar for all nerves tested (P &gt; 0.05), but motor recovery potential differed significantly. After high-level repairs, motor recovery potential was significantly better for the radial and tibial nerves (useful recovery in 66.7 and 54.5% of patients, respectively), than for the ulnar and peroneal nerves (useful recovery in 15.4 and 13.8% of patients, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). After intermediate-level repairs, motor recovery potential was better for the musculocutaneous, radial, and femoral nerves (useful recovery in 100, 98.3, and 87.5% of repairs, respectively), than for the tibial, median and ulnar nerves (useful recovery in 63.9, 52, and 43.6% of repairs, respectively; P &lt; 0.05). In addition, motor recovery potential was significantly the worst with peroneal nerve repairs (useful recovery in 15.2% of patients; P &lt; 0.05). After low-level repairs, motor recovery potential was similar for all nerves (useful recovery in the range of 88.9–100% of patients and in 56.3% of peroneal nerve repairs).

CONCLUSION:

Sensory recovery potential is similar for the median, ulnar, and tibial nerves. The expression of motor recovery potential depends on the repair level. With low- and high-level repairs, it does not stand out in an obvious way, but it is fully expressed with intermediate-level repairs, classifying nerves into three categories with excellent, moderate, and poor recovery potential.

Median and ulnar nerve injuries: a meta-analysis of predictors of motor and sensory recovery after modern microsurgical nerve repair

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to quantify variables that influence outcome after median and ulnar nerve transection injuries. The authors present a meta-analysis based on individual patient data on motor and sensory recovery after microsurgical nerve repair.

METHODS

From 130 studies found after literature review, 23 articles were ultimately included, giving individual data for 623 median or ulnar nerve injuries. The variables age, sex, nerve, site of injury, type of repair, use of grafts, delay between injury and repair, follow-up period, and outcome were extracted. Satisfactory motor recovery was defined as British Medical Research Council motor scale grade 4 and 5, and satisfactory sensory recovery was defined as British Medical Research Council grade 3+ and 4. For motor and sensory recovery, complete data were available for 281 and 380 nerve injuries, respectively.

RESULTS

Motor and sensory recovery were significantly associated (Spearman r = 0.62, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (< 16 years versus > 40 years: odds ratio, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 11.2), site (proximal versus distal: odds ratio, 0.46; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.20 to 1.10), and delay (per month: odds ratio, 0.94; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 0.98) were significant predictors of successful motor recovery. In ulnar nerve injuries, the chance of motor recovery was 71 percent lower than in median nerve injuries (odds ratio, 0.29; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.15 to 0.55). For sensory recovery, age (odds ratio, 27.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 9.4 to 77.6) and delay (per month: odds ratio, 0.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.98) were found to be significant predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this individual patient data meta-analysis, age, site, injured nerve, and delay significantly influenced prognosis after microsurgical repair of median and ulnar nerve injuries.

Missile-caused Ulnar Nerve Injuries: Outcomes of 128 Repairs

OBJECTIVE:

This prospective study presents repair results after missile-caused ulnar nerve ruptures as well as factors influencing the outcomes.

METHODS:

Between 1991 and 1994, 128 casualties with missile-caused complete ulnar nerve injury were managed surgically in the Neurosurgical Department of the Belgrade Military Medical Academy. At least 4 years after surgery, we scored sensorimotor recovery, neurophysiological recovery, and patient judgment of the outcome. On the basis of the total score, we defined the final outcome as poor, insufficient, good, or excellent. The last two outcomes were considered to be successful.

RESULTS:

A successful outcome was obtained in 0% of high-level, 33.8% of intermediate-level, and 77.3% of low-level repairs (P&lt; 0.001). On average, the nerve defect, preoperative interval, and patient age were lower for patients with a successful outcome than for those with an unsuccessful outcome (P= 0.004, P= 0.032, and P= 0.003, respectively). Worsening of the outcome was related to nerve defect longer than 4.5 cm, preoperative interval longer than 5.5 months, and age older than 23 years (P= 0.002, P= 0.034, and P= 0.023, respectively). A successful outcome occurred in 48.8% of patients repaired with direct suture and in 41.2% of patients repaired with a nerve graft (P&gt; 0.05). A successful outcome also occurred 22.2% of combined ulnar-median nerve repairs and in 49.5% of isolated ulnar nerve repairs (P= 0.011). Repair level (P&lt; 0.001), preoperative interval (P= 0.001), length of the nerve defect (P&lt; 0.001), and associated median nerve rupture (P= 0.028) were independent predictors of a successful outcome.

CONCLUSION:

The outcome of ulnar nerve repair depends significantly on the repair level, preoperative interval, associated median nerve injury, length of the nerve defect, and age of the patient. High-level ulnar nerve repair is probably useless if performed in the classic manner.

Problems experienced during the first year of an acute traumatic hand injury - a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based nursing of patients with acute traumatic hand injuries treated at the hand-surgical clinic calls for knowledge about long-term implications.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate consequences of an acute traumatic hand injury during the first year after the accident. Specifically, the objectives were to investigate changes in the experience of physical and psychological problems over time, frequencies of remaining problems and the impact of the injury on work situation and life situation 1 year after the accident.

DESIGN

The study was prospective and followed the patients from the first weeks to 1 year after the accident.

METHOD

Ninety-one patients were assessed three times during the year. Each time the patients answered study-specific questions, the Impact of Event Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

RESULTS

Problems experienced decreased during the first 3 months but tended to remain unchanged during the rest of the year. In the 1-year follow-up, the majority of the patients experienced slight or moderate functional limitations in the hand, one-third had symptoms of trauma-related distress and one out of seven had troublesome pain. Half of the patients who had returned to work reported a worse work situation and 16% were still on the sick list. One-third of all patients considered their whole life situation to be worse as a result of the injury. Patients with amputations more often experienced a worse life situation. Blue-collar workers reported functional limitations and a worse life situation more often than white-collar workers.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute traumatic hand injuries requiring surgical treatment may experience problems, such as functional limitations, trauma-related distress and troublesome pain, with long-term implications for their work situation and life situation.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Caring for hand-injured patients should include, not only surgical treatment and other actions for restoring the function of the hand, but also preventive action and follow-up of trauma-related distress and pain.

Health-related quality of life following operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Although Weber type B ankle fractures are often considered benign with a good prognosis, evidence from observational studies suggests that 17% to 24% of such patients may have less satisfactory outcomes. Although the explanation for variability in outcomes remains unclear, previous studies of other surgical procedures have suggested nonsurgery-related causes account for much of the variability in outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate health-related quality of life in 30 patients with unstable ankle fractures who were otherwise healthy. Only patients from 2 university-affiliated hospitals sustaining unstable type B Weber injury patterns requiring surgery were eligible. Patients provided detailed baseline information regarding alcohol consumption, smoking habits, and educational level. Patients completed the short form 36 questionnaire and a visual analogue pain scale at regular follow-up intervals.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 51.6 years (SD 15.2 years), and 57% (17 out of 30) were male. The majority of fractures were the result of a fall (67%, 20 out of 30), and all were closed injuries. Almost half of all patients were smokers (47%, 14 out of 30), whereas 43% consumed alcohol on a weekly basis (13 out of 30). Forty-three percent of patients (13 out of 30) had obtained an elementary or high school level of education. Patients experienced significant improvements in all domains of the SF-36 questionnaire (P < 0.001), except general health, which remained essentially normal over the 24-month period. Study patients achieved scores similar to age-matched U.S. normative data across 6 of the 8 domains (Role Emotional, Social Function, Mental Health, Bodily Pain, Vitality, and General Health). However, patients' physical function and role physical scores remained significantly lower than US norms at 24 months (21.8 and 20.7 points lower on a 100-point scale, respectively; P < 0.001). Smoking history (P = 0.02), presence of a medial malleolar fracture (P = 0.02), and lower levels of education (P = 0.01) were significant independent predictors of lower physical function up to 3 months postoperation. Lower mental health domain scores were significantly associated with alcohol use (P = 0.02) and increasing age (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

As is the case in many other areas, social factors may be important determinants of outcome in patients with traumatic fractures. Optimal orthopedic care may involve attention to modifiable risk factors, including smoking and alcohol consumption.

A new model instrument for outcome after nerve repair

The Model instrument for outcome after nerve repair has so far proved valid and reliable. It supports the authors' hypothesis that the summary of specific limitations of body function agrees with patients' opinions on the impact of the nerve injury on ADL. These features together with its flexibility make the Model instrument for outcome after nerve repair a psychometrically sound and clinically useful diagnosis-specific outcome instrument for routine evaluation after nerve repair. An optimal choice in the future when assessing the outcome after nerve repair may be a combined use of this model and a more generic outcome instrument. Such a protocol would take into account specific body functions and well being in a wider perspective.