Resection of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

GAME-SCORE predicts pathological and radiological response to chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Genetic And Morphological Evaluation (GAME) score is the newest prognostic model for patient with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). Pathological and radiological responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are key factors for prognostic stratification of these patients. The present study aims to evaluate the GAME-score's ability to predict pathological and radiologic responses to NAC.

METHODS

CRLM patients who underwent liver resection after NAC from January 2010 to December 2021 were categorized by GAME scores: low risk (LR, 0-1), moderate risk (MR, 2-3), and high risk (HR, ≥4). Correlations between groups and radiological/pathological features were analyzed. Poor pathological response was defined as Tumor Regression Grade 4-5.

RESULTS

Of 1054 liver resections for CRLMs, 448 were included. GAME scores were LR: 80 (18 %), MR: 228 (51 %), and HR: 140 (31 %). In this cohort, HR-GAME scores were associated with lower pathological response (LR: 67.1 %, MR: 74.9 %, HR: 82.6 %; p = 0.010). Radiologic progression occurred in 10 % of HR patients, significantly more than in LR (3.8 %) and MR (3.5 %) groups (p = 0.011). Multivariable analysis for independent predictors of pathological response confirmed HR-GAME (RR 1.843, p=0.025) along with age higher than 70 years (RR 2.111, p=0.022) and irinotecan-based NAC (RR 3.066, p < 0.001). For radiological progression disease after NAC, the HR-GAME score (RR 2.77, p=0.016) was the only independent predictor. HR-GAME scores were also associated with higher rates of mucinous differentiation (p = 0.021), satellitosis (p = 0.001), vascular invasion (p = 0.011), and perineural invasion (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

GAME score category should be considered into planning of therapeutic strategy of patients with CRLMs.

Analysis of the therapeutic effect and influencing factors on unresectable gastric cancer treated with conversion therapy

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in China, and with the extensive development of conversion therapy, the treatment of advanced unresectable gastric cancer (AUGC) patients has ushered in a new dawn. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of conversion therapy in AUGC patients and explored the relevant factors affecting the efficacy.

Method

We collected information from GC patients who received conversion therapy from this center and designed a retrospective study.

Results

We collected relevant clinical data from 160 patients with AUGC. A total of 120 patients who underwent routine R0 resection were identified as conversion cases. A total of 25 patients (15.6%) achieved pCR, 92 patients (57.5%) achieved objective response rate (ORR), 140 patients (87.5%) achieved disease control rate (DCR), and 20 cases (12.5%) observed tumor progression. There were 86 patients who achieved pathological downgrading, with a total downgrading rate of 53.8%. Among the 160 patients, 37 patients (23.1%) had postoperative complications of varying degrees. A total of 72 patients (45.0%) had tumor recurrence/progression at the end of follow-up. The last chemotherapy and surgery (CST) (OR = 1.046, 95% CI 1.013-1.081, p = 0.006), tumor invasion (OR = 32.096, 95% CI 5.091-202.349, p < 0.001), and distant metastasis (OR = 7.050, 95% CI 1.888-26.323, p = 0.004) were independent factors influencing the efficacy of conversion therapy.

Conclusion

Conversion therapy may have a good therapeutic efficacy for AUGC, and some clinical factors affect the efficacy response.

Classifying histopathological growth patterns for resected colorectal liver metastasis with a deep learning analysis

BACKGROUND

Histopathological growth patterns are one of the strongest prognostic factors in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. Development of an efficient, objective and ideally automated histopathological growth pattern scoring method can substantially help the implementation of histopathological growth pattern assessment in daily practice and research. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep-learning algorithm, namely neural image compression, to distinguish desmoplastic from non-desmoplastic histopathological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases based on digital haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides.

METHODS

The algorithm was developed using digitalized whole-slide images obtained in a single-centre (Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, the Netherlands) cohort of patients who underwent first curative intent resection for colorectal liver metastases between January 2000 and February 2019. External validation was performed on whole-slide images of patients resected between October 2004 and December 2017 in another institution (Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands). The outcomes of interest were the automated classification of dichotomous hepatic growth patterns, distinguishing between desmoplastic hepatic growth pattern and non-desmoplatic growth pattern by a deep-learning model; secondary outcome was the correlation of these classifications with overall survival in the histopathology manual-assessed histopathological growth pattern and those assessed using neural image compression.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and thirty-two patients, corresponding to 3.641 whole-slide images, were reviewed to develop the algorithm and 870 whole-slide images were used for external validation. Median follow-up for the development and the validation cohorts was 43 and 29 months respectively. The neural image compression approach achieved significant discriminatory power to classify 100% desmoplastic histopathological growth pattern with an area under the curve of 0.93 in the development cohort and 0.95 upon external validation. Both the histopathology manual-scored histopathological growth pattern and neural image compression-classified histopathological growth pattern achieved a similar multivariable hazard ratio for desmoplastic versus non-desmoplastic growth pattern in the development cohort (histopathology manual score: 0.63 versus neural image compression: 0.64) and in the validation cohort (histopathology manual score: 0.40 versus neural image compression: 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

The neural image compression approach is suitable for pathology-based classification tasks of colorectal liver metastases.

Successful intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma conversion surgery after administration of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor

We describe a case of a 47-year-old male patient with initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the right liver lobe with tumor thrombi extending from the right bile duct to the common and left bile ducts. Conventional chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for 19 months resulted in progressive disease. Subsequently, a comprehensive genome profile revealed fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 rearrangement, and hence, pemigatinib administration was initiated. After 6 months of pemigatinib therapy, significant shrinking of the tumor and disappearance of the tumor thrombi in the common and left bile duct were observed. Subsequently, the patient underwent conversion surgery, resulting in successful radical resection of the tumor. The patient has been disease-free for 7 months.

Evolution and current trends in the management of colorectal cancer liver metastasis

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a major cause of cancer-related death, with a 5-year relative overall survival of up to 20%. The liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC), with about 50% of CRC patients metastasizing to their liver over the course of their disease. Complete liver resection is the primary modality of treatment for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM), with an overall 5-year survival rate of up to 58%. However, only 15% to 20% of patients with CRLM are deemed suitable for resection at presentation. For unresectable diseases, the median survival of patients remains low even with the best chemotherapy. In recent decades, the management of CRLM has continued to evolve with the expansion of resection criteria, novel targeted systemic therapies, and improved locoregional therapies. However, due to the heterogeneity of the CRC patient population, the optimal evaluation of treatment options for CRLM remains complex. Therefore, effective management requires a multidisciplinary team to help define resectability and devise a personalized treatment approach, from the initial diagnosis to the final treatment.

New trends in surgery for colorectal liver metastasis

By presenting the most up-to-date findings and incorporating the latest evidence, this article seeks to present a comprehensive guide for navigating the complexities inherent in the management of colorectal liver metastasis. It aims to serve as a valuable resource offering clinicians and healthcare professionals an understanding of the diverse modalities and approaches available for treating this challenging and multifaceted disease. In an era of rapidly evolving medical knowledge, this article examines the latest insights to make informed decisions in the realm of colorectal liver metastasis management. The article does not only highlight the up-to-date knowledge but also provides the evidence for existing therapeutic strategies. This practical tool provides evidence-based recommendations to clinicians, thereby contributing to the ongoing advancement of effective treatment strategies for this challenging disease.

Outcomes of Hepatic Artery-Based Therapies and Systemic Multiagent Chemotherapy in Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (UCRLM) includes locoregional and systemic therapy. A comprehensive analysis capturing long-term outcomes of these treatment options has not been performed.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled outcomes of hepatic artery infusion with systemic chemotherapy (HAI-S), transarterial chemoembolization with systemic chemotherapy (TACE-S), transarterial radioembolization with systemic chemotherapy (TARE-S), doublet (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI), and triplet chemotherapy (FOLFOXIRI).

METHODS

Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), rate of conversion to resection (CTR), and response rate (RR).

RESULTS

A total of 32, 7, 9, and 14 publications were included in the HAI-S, TACE-S, and TARE-S chemotherapy arms. The 6/12/24/36-month OS estimates for HAI-S, TACE-S, TARE-S, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI were 97%/80%/54%/35%, 100%/83%/40%/14%, 82%/61%/34%/21%, 96%/83%/53%/36%, and 96%/93%/72%/55%. Similarly, the 6/12/24/36-month PFS estimates were 74%/44%/19%/14%, 66%/20%/9%/3%, 57%/23%/10%/3%, 69%/30%/12%/7%, and 88%/55%/18%/11%. The corresponding CTR and RR rates were 31, 20%, unmeasurable (TARE-S), 35, 53; and 49, 45, 45, 50, 80%, respectively. The majority of chemotherapy studies included first-line therapy and liver-only metastases, whereas most HAI-S studies were pretreated. On subgroup analysis in first-line setting with liver-only metastases, the HAI-S arm had comparable outcomes to FOLFOXIRI and outperformed doublet chemotherapy regimens. Although triplet chemotherapy appeared to outperform other arms, high toxicity and inclusion of potentially resectable patients must be considered while interpreting results.

CONCLUSIONS

HAI-S and multiagent chemotherapy are effective therapies for UCRLM. To make definitive conclusions, a randomized trial with comparable patient characteristics and line of therapy will be required. The upcoming EA2222 PUMP trial may help to address this question.

Stage IV Rectal Cancer and Timing of Surgical Approach

Liver metastases are seen in at least 60% of patients with colorectal cancer at some point during the course of their disease. The management of both primary and liver disease is uniquely challenging in rectal cancer due to competing treatments and complex sequence of treatments depending on the clinical presentation of disease. Recently, several novel concepts are shaping new treatment paradigms, including changes in timing, sequence, and duration of therapies combined with potential deescalation of treatment components. Overall, the treatment of this clinical scenario mandates multidisciplinary evaluation and personalization of care; however, there is still considerable debate regarding the timing of liver metastasectomy in the context of the overall treatment plan. Herein, we will discuss the current literature on management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, current treatment approaches with respect to chemotherapy, and role of hepatic artery infusion therapy.

FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab as conversion therapy for unresectable RAS/BRAF wild-type left-sided colorectal cancer with liver-limited metastases: a prospective dual-center pilot study

Purpose

To explore the efficacy and safety of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab regimen as conversion therapy for patients with unresectable RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal liver-limited metastases (CLM).

Patients and methods

This was a dual-center, phase II trial with the rate of no evidence of disease (NED) achieved as the primary endpoint. All enrolled patients with initially unresectable left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type colorectal liver-limited metastases received a modified FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab regimen as conversion therapy.

Results

Between October 2019 and October 2021, fifteen patients were enrolled. Nine patients (60%) achieved NED. The overall response rate (ORR) was 92.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 9 (95% CI: 0-20.7) months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.0 months (95% CI: 5.7-20.5), and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The most frequently occurring grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (20%), peripheral neurotoxicity (13.3%), diarrhea (6.7%), and rash acneiform (6.7%).

Conclusion

The FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab regimen displayed tolerable toxicity and promising anti-tumor activity in terms of the rate of NED achieved and response rate in patients with initially unresectable left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type CLM. This regimen merits further investigation.

Liver regeneration after portal and hepatic vein embolization improves overall survival compared with portal vein embolization alone: mid-term survival analysis of the multicentre DRAGON 0 cohort

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year overall survival after simultaneous portal (PVE) and hepatic vein (HVE) embolization versus PVE alone in patients undergoing liver resection for primary and secondary cancers of the liver.

METHODS

In this multicentre retrospective study, all DRAGON 0 centres provided 3-year follow-up data for all patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE, and were included in DRAGON 0 between 2016 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was undertaken to assess 3-year overall and recurrence/progression-free survival. Factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 199 patients were included from 7 centres, of whom 39 underwent PVE/HVE and 160 PVE alone. Groups differed in median age (P = 0.008). As reported previously, PVE/HVE resulted in a significantly higher resection rate than PVE alone (92 versus 68%; P = 0.007). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in the PVE/HVE group (median survival not reached after 36 months versus 20 months after PVE; P = 0.004). Univariable and multivariable analyses identified PVE/HVE as an independent predictor of survival (univariable HR 0.46, 95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.76; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Overall survival after PVE/HVE is substantially longer than that after PVE alone in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours.

Preoperative chemotherapy in upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases: New elements for an old dilemma?

The use of preoperative or "neoadjuvant" chemotherapy (NAC) has long been controversial for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2023 guidelines on metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate a combination of surgical/technical and oncologic/prognostic criteria as the two determinants for allocating patients to NAC or upfront hepatectomy. However, surgical and technical criteria have evolved, and oncologic prognostic criteria date from the pre-modern chemotherapy era and lack prospective validation. The traditional literature is interpreted as not supporting the use of NAC because several studies fail to demonstrate a benefit in overall survival (OS) compared to upfront surgery; however, OS may not be the most appropriate endpoint to consider. Moreover, the commonly quoted studies against NAC contain many limitations that may explain why NAC failed to demonstrate its value. The query of the recent literature focused primarily on other aspects than OS, such as surgical technique, the impact of side effects of chemotherapy, the histological growth pattern of metastases, or the detection of circulating tumor DNA, shows data that support a more widespread use of NAC. These should prompt a critical reappraisal of the use of NAC, leading to a more precise selection of patients who could benefit from it.

Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.

An attempt to establish and apply global benchmarks for liver resection of malignant hepatic tumors

BACKGROUND

Benchmarking is a process of continuous self-evaluation and comparison with best-in-class hospitals to guide quality improvement initiatives. We sought to define global benchmarks relative to liver resection for malignancy and to assess their achievement in hospitals in the United States.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or colorectal or neuroendocrine liver metastases between 2000 and 2019 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Propensity score matching was conducted to balance baseline characteristics between open and minimally invasive approaches. Best-in-class hospitals were defined relative to the achievement rate of textbook oncologic outcomes and case volume. Benchmark values were established relative to best-in-class institutions. The achievement of benchmark values among hospitals in the National Cancer Database was then assessed.

RESULTS

Among 2,624 patients treated at 20 centers, a majority underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1,609, 61.3%), followed by colorectal liver metastases (n = 650, 24.8%), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (n = 299, 11.4%), and neuroendocrine liver metastases (n = 66, 2.5%). Notably, 1,947 (74.2%) patients achieved a textbook oncologic outcome. After propensity score matching, 6 best-in-class hospitals with the highest textbook oncologic outcome rates (≥75.0%) were identified. Benchmark values were calculated for margin positivity (≤11.7%), 30-day readmission (≤4.1%), 30-day mortality (≤1.6%), minor postoperative complications (≤24.7%), severe complications (≤12.4%), and failure to achieve the textbook oncologic outcome (≤22.8%). Among the National Cancer Database hospitals, global benchmarks for margin positivity, 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, severe complications, and textbook oncologic outcome failure were achieved in 62.9%, 27.1%, 12.1%, 7.1%, and 29.3% of centers, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These global benchmarks may help identify hospitals that may benefit from quality improvement initiatives, aiming to improve patient safety and surgical oncologic outcomes.

Perioperative Chemotherapy is Associated with Superior Overall Survival in Patients with Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

The sequence of localized and systemic treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains debated. Our objective is to analyze the effect of treatment sequence on overall survival (OS) in patients with CRLM using a large cancer database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The national cancer database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed between 2004 and 2016. OS was analyzed using standard univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

We identified 72,376 patients with synchronous CRLM, of whom 43,039 had liver-only metastases. Patients with liver-only CRLM had a median OS of 18.9 months, versus those with CRLM plus extrahepatic sites (11.3 months). In patients with liver-only CRLM, resection of both the primary and metastatic site was associated with median OS 38.9 months versus 30.2 months after resection of the metastatic site alone, and resection of the primary tumor alone (22.3 months, all p < 0.001). Receipt of perioperative chemotherapy correlated with a median OS of 44.7 months versus preoperative chemotherapy only (38.4 months) or postoperative chemotherapy only (27.9 months, all p < 0.001). Patients who received chemotherapy alone had a median OS of 16.4 months versus those who underwent resection without chemotherapy (9.5 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals a correlation between perioperative chemotherapy and superior OS in patients with liver-only CRLM, and shows that resection of the metastatic site was linked to better OS. Despite obvious cohort heterogeneity, the data can support a resection approach with additional, preferably peri- or preoperative systemic therapy for patients with CRLM.

Case Report: Stereotactic body radiation treatment for immunotherapy escaped oligometastatic progression in cutaneous melanoma and merkel cell carcinoma

Oligometastatic progression represents a unique manifestation of tumor immune-escape that can lead to disease progression during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). The diagnosis and further optimal management of oligometastatic progression through ICI remains unclear. Diagnostic challenges include practical limitations due to the anatomical sites of oligometastatic progression, such as the para-aortic region, where traditional tissue biopsy carries high risk, and circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) could aid in diagnosis and disease monitoring as a supplement to surveillance imaging. In this report, we describe two cases of one patient with metastatic melanoma and the other with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) who were treated with ICI and later developed localized resistance due to oligometastatic progression. We further highlight our experience using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a salvage approach to treat the oligometastatic progression. In addition, we describe the temporal and dynamic relationship of circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) prior to, during and after SBRT, which highly suggested the diagnosis without obtaining a histological specimen. Our cases highlight a potential role for SBRT in the management of oligometastatic progression. However, large prospective trials are essential to confirm the utility of this approach.

Case Report: Camrelizumab combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in the treatment of advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report and literature review

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is one of the most common invasive malignant tumors, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Currently, radical surgical resection is the preferred treatment for ICC. However, most patients are only diagnosed at an advanced stage and are therefore not eligible for surgery. Herein, we present a case of advanced ICC in which radical surgery was not possible due to tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery. Six treatment cycles with a gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen combined with camrelizumab immunotherapy achieved a partial response and successful tumor conversion, as tumor invasion of the second porta hepatis and right hepatic artery was no longer evident. The patient subsequently underwent successful radical surgical resection, including hepatectomy, caudate lobe resection, and cholecystectomy combined with lymph node dissection. Cases of patients with advanced ICC undergoing surgical resection after combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy are rare. The GEMOX regimen combined with camrelizumab demonstrated favorable antitumor efficacy and safety, suggesting that it might be a potential feasible and safe conversion therapy strategy for patients with advanced ICC.

Hepatic arterial infusion in combination with systemic chemotherapy in patients with hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II study - (NCT05103020) - study protocol

BACKGROUND

Although 80% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) experience liver metastases, only 10-25% undergo resection at the time of diagnosis. Even in initially unresectable conditions, if appropriate treatment is provided, such as surgical conversion through a combination of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (sys-CT), better overall survival can be expected. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of HAI oxaliplatin in combination with sys-CT plus targeted therapy in patients with unresectable CRC with liver-only metastasis.

METHODS

This is a single-center, randomized, open-label phase II trial (NCT05103020). Patients with untreated CRC, who have liver-only metastases and for whom liver resection is potentially possible but deemed infeasible at the time of initial diagnosis by a multidisciplinary team, will be eligible. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the combined HAI oxaliplatin and modified systemic 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus targeted therapy group or the systemic FOLFIRI plus targeted therapy group. Both regimens will be repeated every 2 weeks for a total of 12 cycles. The primary objective of this study is to compare the rate of conversion to liver resection. The surgical conversion rate is expected to increase by 25% with HAI oxaliplatin in combination with sys-CT plus targeted therapy (40% in the experimental arm versus 15% in the control arm) (power, 80%; two-sided alpha-risk, 5%). The secondary objectives include overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of HAI oxaliplatin in combination with sys-CT plus targeted therapy as first-line treatment from the initial diagnosis in patients with unresectable CRC with liver-only metastasis, aiming to significantly increase the surgical conversion rate.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT05103020). Trial registration date: November 2, 2021.

Survival outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer with synchronous liver only metastasis

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer with synchronous liver-only metastasis is managed with a multimodal approach, however, optimal sequencing of modalities remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all consecutive rectal or colon cancer cases with synchronous liver-only metastasis was conducted from the South Australian Colorectal Cancer Registry from 2006 to 2021. This study aimed to investigate how order and type of treatment modality affects overall survival.

RESULTS

Data of over 5000 cases were analysed (n = 5244), 1420 cases had liver-only metastasis. There were a greater number of colon than rectal primaries (N = 1056 versus 364). Colonic resection was the preferred initial treatment for the colon cohort (60%). In the rectal cohort, 30% had upfront resection followed by 27% that had chemo-radiotherapy as 1st line therapy. For the colon cohort, there was an improved 5-year survival with surgical resection as initial treatment compared to chemotherapy (25% versus 9%, P < 0.001). In the rectal cohort, chemo-radiotherapy as the initial treatment was associated with an improved 5-year survival compared to surgery or chemotherapy (40% versus 26% versus 19%, P = 0.0015). Patients who were able to have liver resection had improved survival, with 50% surviving over 5 years compared to 12 months in the non-resected group (P < 0.001). Primary rectal KRAS wildtype patients who underwent liver resection and received Cetuximab had significantly worse outcomes compared to KRAS wildtype patients who did not (P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

Where surgery is possible, resection of liver metastasis and primary tumour improved overall survival. Further research is required on the use of targeted treatments in patients undergoing liver resection.

Surgery of Colorectal Liver Metastases Involving the Inferior Vena Cava: A Systematic Review

Combined hepatic and inferior vena cava (IVC) resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) involving the IVC. Most of the existing data come from case reports or small case series. In this paper, a systematic review based on the PICO strategy was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Papers from January 1980 to December 2022 were searched in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library databases. Articles considered for inclusion had to present data on simultaneous liver and IVC resection for CRLM and report surgical and/or oncological outcomes. From a total of 1175 articles retrieved, 29, including a total of 188 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 58.3 ± 10.8 years. The most frequent techniques used were right hepatectomy ± caudate lobe for hepatic resections (37.8%), lateral clamping (44.8%) for vascular control, and primary closure (56.8%) for IVC repair. The thirty-day mortality reached 4.6%. Tumour relapse was reported in 65.8% of the cases. The median overall survival (OS) was 34 months (with a confidence interval of 30-40 months), and the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS were 71.4%, 19.8%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the absence of prospective randomized studies, which are difficult to perform, IVC resection seems to be safe and feasible.

Two stage hepatectomy (TSH) versus ALPPS for initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although numerous comparisons between conventional Two Stage Hepatectomy (TSH) and Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) have been reported, the heterogeneity of malignancies previously compared represents an important source of selection bias. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between TSH and ALPPS to treat patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

Main electronic databases were searched using medical subject headings for CRLM surgically treated with TSH or ALPPS. Patients treated for primary or secondary liver malignancies other than CRLM were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 335 patients from 5 studies were included. Postoperative major complications were higher in the ALPPS group (relative risk [RR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.06, I² = 0%), while no differences were observed in terms of perioperative mortality (RR 1.53, 95% CI 0.64-3.62, I² = 0%). ALPPS was associated with higher completion of hepatectomy rates (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09-1.61, I² = 85%), as well as R0 resection rates (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.13-2.30, I² = 40%). Nevertheless, no significant differences were achieved between groups in terms of overall survival (OS) (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68-1.27, I² = 52%) and disease-free survival (DFS) (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.47-2.49, I² = 54%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

ALPPS and TSH to treat CRLM seem to have comparable operative risks in terms of mortality rates. No definitive conclusions regarding OS and DFS can be drawn from the results.

Survival improvement for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer over twenty years

Over the past two decades of successive clinical trials in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), the median overall survival of both control and experimental arms has steadily improved. However, the incremental change in survival for metastatic CRC patients not treated on trial has not yet been quantified. We performed a retrospective review of 1420 patients with de novo metastatic CRC who received their primary treatment at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC) from 2004 through 2019. Median OS was roughly stable for patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2012 (22.6 months) but since has steadily improved for those diagnosed in 2013 to 2015 (28.8 months), and 2016 to 2019 (32.4 months). Likewise, 5-year survival rate has increased from 15.7% for patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2006 to 26% for those diagnosed from 2013 to 2015. Notably, survival improved for patients with BRAFV600E mutant as well as microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) tumors. Multivariate regression analysis identified surgical resection of liver metastasis (HR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.19-0.37), use of immunotherapy (HR = 0.44, 95% CI, 0.29-0.67) and use of third line chemotherapy (regorafenib or trifluridine/tipiracil, HR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.58-0.95), but not year of diagnosis (HR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.98-1), as associated with better survival, suggesting that increased use of these therapies are the drivers of the observed improvement in survival.

Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Multimodal Therapy

Despite a steady decline in incidence and mortality rates, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second most common cancer diagnosis in women and the third most common in men worldwide. Notably, the liver is recognized as the most common site of CRC metastasis, and metastases to the liver remain the primary driver of disease-specific mortality for patients with CRC. Although hepatic resection is the backbone of curative-intent treatment, management of CRLM has become increasingly multimodal during the last decade and includes the use of downstaging chemotherapy, ablation techniques, and locoregional therapy, each of which are reviewed herein.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus S-1 versus gemcitabine, cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer (KHBO1401- MITSUBA)

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been the standard palliative chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). No randomized clinical trials have been able to demonstrate the survival benefit over GC during the past decade. In our previous phase II trial, adding S-1 to GC (GCS) showed promising efficacy and we aimed to determine whether GCS could improve overall survival compared with GC for patients with advanced BTC.

METHODS

We performed a mulitcenter, randomized phase III trial across 39 centers. Enrolled patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either the GCS or GC arm. The GCS regimen comprised gemcitabine (1000 mg/m² ) and cisplatin (25 mg/m² ) infusion on day 1 and 80 mg/m² of S-1 on days 1-7 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and adverse events (AEs). This study is registered with Clinical trial identification: NCT02182778.

RESULTS

Between July 2014 and February 2016, 246 patients were enrolled. The median OS and 1-year OS rate were 13.5 months and 59.4% in the GCS arm and 12.6 months and 53.7% in the GC arm, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.628-0.996; P = .046 [stratified log-rank test]). Median PFS was 7.4 months in the GCS arm and 5.5 months in the GC arm (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.577-0.970; P = .015). RR was 41.5% in the GCS arm and 15.0% in the GC arm. Grade 3 or worse AEs did not show significant differences between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

GCS is the first regimen which demonstrated survival benefits as well as higher RR over GC in a randomized phase III trial and could be the new first-line standard chemotherapy for advanced BTC. To exploit the advantage of its high RR, GCS is now tested in the neoadjuvant setting in a randomized phase III trial for potentially resectable BTC.

Precision surgery for colorectal liver metastases: Current knowledge and future perspectives

Precision surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) includes optimal selection of both the patient and surgery. Initial attempts of using clinical risk scores to identify patients for whom technically feasible surgery is oncologically futile failed. Since then, patient selection for single-stage hepatectomy followed three distinct approaches, all of which incorporated biomarkers. The BRAF V600E mutation, the G12V KRAS variant, and the triple mutation of RAS, TP53, and SMAD4 appear to be the most promising, but none can be used in isolation to deny surgery in otherwise resectable cases. Combining biomarkers with clinicopathologic factors that predict poor prognosis may be used to select patients for surgery, but external validation and matched analyses with medically treated counterparts are needed. Patient selection for special surgical procedures (two-stage hepatectomy [TSH], Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein Ligation for staged hepatectomy [ALPPS], and liver transplant [LT]) has been recently refined. Specifically, BRAF mutations and right-sided laterality have been proposed as separate contraindications to LT. A similar association of right-sided laterality, particularly when combined with RAS mutations, with very poor outcomes has been observed for ALPPS and has been suggested as a biologic contraindication. Data are scarce for TSH but RAS mutations may portend very poor survival following TSH completion. The selection of the best single-stage hepatectomy (optimal margin and type of resection) based on biomarkers remains debated, although there is some evidence that RAS may play a significant role. Lastly, although there are currently no criteria to select among the three special techniques based on their efficacy or appropriateness in different settings, RAS mutational status may be used to select patients for TSH, while right-sided tumor in conjunction with a RAS mutation may be a contraindication to LT and ALPPS.

Immunotherapy for metastatic liver disease from colorectal carcinoma: case series from the Middle East

Immunotherapy poses new considerations and alterations to the management of metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC), where chemotherapy achieves complete radiological response but yields complete pathological response in few patients only. Immunotherapy may be superior in the conversion of unresectable disease to resectable liver lesions from mCRC and downsizing borderline lesions for more feasible resectability and achieving complete pathologic response, with the potential for cure and to alter current, established guidelines for surgical resection with a shift from chemotherapy. We present two patients with hepatic lesions from mCRC characterized by deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) which were unresectable after traditional chemotherapy but were converted to resectable lesions with a complete histopathological response following immunotherapy. Complete histopathologic response and radiologic regression or disappearance of liver lesions was observed in patients with dMMR mCRC after pembrolizumab. Immunotherapy exhibits notable potential for cure, achieving complete, successful surgical resection and improving prognosis.

Impact of perioperative chemotherapy on survival outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver

Aim: Compare overall survival (OS) between adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and analyze the effect of chemotherapy on OS. Materials & methods: National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma with isolated liver metastases between 2004 and 2016. We evaluated the OS and chemotherapy effect using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable cox regression analyses. Results: Total 6883 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and liver metastases were included, of which 6042 patients were treated with surgery and chemotherapy and 841 patients were treated with surgery only. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better OS compared with patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion: Patients with colorectal cancer with isolated liver metastases who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy had better OS compared with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable advanced biliary tract cancer treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy: a case report and literature review

Recently, the number of reports describing patients with initially unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) who underwent resection in the form of conversion surgery is increasing. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) combination therapy has been reported to significantly prolong the median survival time from 8.1 to 11.7 months compared with conventional gemcitabine therapy in patients with unresectable BTC. We report the case of a patient with unresectable BTC who underwent conversion surgery with a partial response to GC combination therapy. A 78-year-old woman was diagnosed with unresectable BTC with invasion of the right hepatic artery by lymph node metastasis and liver metastases. The patient received GC combination therapy. After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, the patient achieved a partial response. The radiological findings revealed a marked shrinkage in the primary lesion and the disappearance of lymph node and liver metastases. Therefore, the patient underwent conversion surgery, including biliary tract resection and regional lymph node dissection. For postoperative follow-up, the patient was monitored without receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient had not exhibited recurrence during the 12-month follow-up period. We report the case of a patient with unresectable BTC who underwent conversion surgery with a partial response to GC combination therapy.

Limited Effect of Perioperative Systemic Therapy in Patients Selected for Repeat Local Treatment of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the potential benefit of perioperative systemic therapy on overall and progression-free survival after repeat local treatment in patients suffering from recurrent colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM).

Background

The optimal treatment strategy in patients with recurrent CRLM needs to be clarified, in particular for those suffering from early recurrence of CRLM.

Methods

In this multicenter observational cohort study, consecutive patients diagnosed with recurrent CRLM between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively identified in 4 academic liver surgery centers. Disease-free interval after initial local treatment of CRLM was categorized into recurrence within 6, between 6 and 12, and after 12 months. Perioperative systemic therapy consisted of induction, (neo)adjuvant, or combined regimens. Overall and progression-free survival after repeat local treatment of CRLM were analyzed by multivariable Cox regression analyses, resulting in adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).

Results

Out of 303 patients included for analysis, 90 patients received perioperative systemic therapy for recurrent CRLM. Favorable overall (aHR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.75) and progression-free (aHR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.78) survival were observed in patients with a disease-free interval of more than 12 months. No significant difference in overall and progression-free survival was observed in patients receiving perioperative systemic therapy at repeat local treatment of CRLM, stratified for disease-free interval, previous exposure to chemotherapy, and RAS mutation status.

Conclusions

No benefit of perioperative systemic therapy was observed in overall and progression-free survival after repeat local treatment of recurrent CRLM.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery for Resectable Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: a Multicenter, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is widely used, but its efficacy lacks clear evidence. This retrospective cohort study investigated the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) compared to upfront surgery for CRLM.

METHODS

Data from patients with resectable CRLM were analyzed. Short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis were analyzed using propensity score matching. CRLM was stratified according to the H-classification (H1 and H2), and the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy was analyzed in each group.

RESULTS

We analyzed 599 cases that were matched into an NAC group (n = 136) and an upfront surgery group (n = 136). The proportion of synchronous metastases, H2-classification, and postoperative chemotherapy rate did not differ between the groups. Overall survival (OS) after initial treatment was significantly worse in the NAC group than in the upfront surgery group (P = 0.029). The 5-, 7-, and 10-year OS rates for H1 patients were significantly better in the upfront surgery group than in the NAC group (64%, 51%, and 44% vs. 50%, 31%, and 18%, respectively) (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with resectable CRLM should undergo upfront surgery, because NAC did not improve OS after initial treatment in these patients.

Recipient and Donor Outcomes After Living-Donor Liver Transplant for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases

Question

What are the estimated overall and recurrence-free survival outcomes after living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) in patients with liver-confined, unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM)?

Findings

In this cohort study of 10 adults with CRLM who received LDLT, Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free and overall survival at a median follow-up of 1.5 years were 62% and 100%, respectively. Perioperative outcomes for both recipients and donors were consistent with established benchmarks.

Meaning

The results suggest that LDLT may be a viable treatment option for select patients with unresectable CRLMs with favorable tumor biology.

Importance

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death, and nearly 70% of patients with this cancer have unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs). Compared with chemotherapy, liver transplant has been reported to improve survival in patients with CRLMs, but in North America, liver allograft shortages make the use of deceased-donor allografts for this indication problematic.

Objective

To examine survival outcomes of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) for unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study included patients at 3 North American liver transplant centers with established LDLT programs, 2 in the US and 1 in Canada. Patients with liver-confined, unresectable CRLMs who had demonstrated sustained disease control on oncologic therapy met the inclusion criteria for LDLT. Patients included in this study underwent an LDLT between July 2017 and October 2020 and were followed up until May 1, 2021.

Exposures

Living-donor liver transplant.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Perioperative morbidity and mortality of treated patients and donors, assessed by univariate statistics, and 1.5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free and overall survival for transplant recipients.

Results

Of 91 evaluated patients, 10 (11%) underwent LDLT (6 [60%] male; median age, 45 years [range, 35-58 years]). Among the 10 living donors, 7 (70%) were male, and the median age was 40.5 years (range, 27-50 years). Kaplan-Meier estimates for recurrence-free and overall survival at 1.5 years after LDLT were 62% and 100%, respectively. Perioperative morbidity for both donors and recipients was consistent with established standards (Clavien-Dindo complications among recipients: 3 [10%] had none, 3 [30%] had grade II, and 4 [40%] had grade III; donors: 5 [50%] had none, 4 [40%] had grade I, and 1 had grade III).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study’s findings of recurrence-free and overall survival rates suggest that select patients with unresectable, liver-confined CRLMs may benefit from total hepatectomy and LDLT.

Conversion surgery following gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy for initially unresectable gallbladder cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a case report

Background

Conversion surgery, which is defined as chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery, may improve survival of patients with initially unresectable advanced biliary tract cancer, including gallbladder cancer. However, there are few reports on conversion surgery for advanced gallbladder cancer.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with initially unresectable gallbladder cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis. She underwent gemcitabine plus cisplatin therapy for 9 months. Extended cholecystectomy, resection of the extrahepatic bile duct with regional lymph node dissection, and total omentectomy were then performed as conversion surgery. The patient has survived without recurrence for 19 months postoperatively (31 months after the initial diagnosis) while continuing chemotherapy.

Conclusions

This case suggests that conversion surgery for advanced gallbladder cancer is effective and may be curative for locally advanced disease and distant metastasis such as peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Patient-centered developments in colon- and rectal cancer with a multidisciplinary international team: From translational research to national guidelines

Rarely, scientific developments centered around the patient as a whole are published. Our multidisciplinary group, headed by gastrointestinal surgeons, applied this research philosophy considering the most important aspects of the diseases "colon- and rectal cancer" in the long-term developments. Good expert cooperation/knowledge at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU) were applied in several phase III trials for multimodal treatments of primary tumors (MMT) and metastatic diseases (involving nearly 2000 patients and 64 centers), for treatment individualization of MMT and of metastatic disease, for psycho-oncology/quality of life involving the patients' wishes, and for disease prevention. Most of the targets initially were heavily rejected/discussed in the scientific communities, but now have become standards in treatments and national guidelines or are topics in modern translational research protocols involving molecular biology for e.g., "patient centered individualized treatment". In this context we also describe the paths we had to tread in order to realize our new goals, which at the end were highly beneficial for the patients from many points of view. This description is also important for students and young researchers who, with an actual view on our recent developments, might want to know how medical progress was achieved.

From conventional two-stage hepatectomy to ALPPS: Fifteen years of experience in a hepatobiliary surgery unit

BACKGROUND

Hepatectomy in patients with large tumor load may result in postoperative liver failure and associated complications due to excessive liver parenchyma removal. Conventional two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique are possible solutions to this problem. Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is the most frequent indication, and there is a need to assess outcomes for both techniques to improve surgical and long-term oncological outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective study was designed to compare TSH with ALPPS in patients with initially unresectable bilateral liver tumors between January 2005 and January 2020. ALPPS was performed from January 2012 onwards as the technique of choice. Long-term overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated as primary outcome in CRLM patients. Postoperative morbidity, mortality and liver growth in all patients were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 38 staged hepatectomies were performed: 17 TSH and 21 ALPPS. Complete resection rate was 76.5% (n = 13) in the TSH group and 85.7% (n = 18) in the ALPPS group (P = 0.426). Overall major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a) (stage 1 + stage 2) was 41.2% (n = 7) in TSH and 33.3% (n = 7) in ALPPS patients (P = 0.389), and perioperative 90-day mortalities were 11.8% (n = 2) vs. 19.0% (n = 4) in each group, respectively (P = 0.654). Intention-to-treat OS rates at 1 and 5 years in CRLM patients for TSH (n = 15) were 80% and 33%, and for ALPPS (n = 17) 76% and 35%, respectively. DFS rates at 1 and 5 years were 36% and 27% in the TSH group vs. 33% and 27% in the ALPPS group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ALPPS is an effective alternative to TSH in bilateral affecting liver tumors, allowing higher resection rate, but patients must be carefully selected. In CRLM patients similar long-term OS and DFS can be achieved with both techniques.

Survival after secondary liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: Comparing data of three prospective randomized European trials (LICC, CELIM, FIRE-3)

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with liver-limited disease (LLD) have a chance of long-term survival and potential cure after hepatic metastasectomy. However, the appropriate postoperative treatment strategy is still controversial. The CELIM and FIRE-3 studies demonstrated that secondary hepatic resection significantly improved overall survival (OS). The objective of this analysis was to compare these favorable outcome data with recent results from the LICC trial investigating the antigen-specific cancer vaccine tecemotide (L-BLP25) as adjuvant therapy in mCRC patients with LLD after R0/R1 resection. Data from mCRC patients with LLD and secondary hepatic resection from each study were analyzed for efficacy outcomes based on patient characteristics, treatment and surveillance after surgery. In LICC, 40/121 (33%) patients, in CELIM 36/111 (32%) and in FIRE-3-LLD 29/133 (22%) patients were secondarily resected, respectively. Of those, 31 (77.5%) patients in LICC and all patients in CELIM were R0 resected. Median disease-free survival after resection was 8.9 months in LICC, 9.9 months in CELIM. Median OS in secondarily resected patients was 66.1 months in LICC, 53.9 months in CELIM and 56.2 months in FIRE-3-LLD. Median age was about 5 years less in LICC compared to CELIM and FIRE-3. Secondarily resected patients of LICC, CELIM and FIRE-3 showed an impressive median survival with a tendency for improved survival for patients in the LICC trial. A younger patient cohort but also more selective surgery, improved resection techniques, deep responses and a close surveillance program after surgery in the LICC trial may have had a positive impact on survival.

The evolution of surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A persistent challenge to improve survival

Only a few decades ago, the opinion that colorectal liver metastases were a palliative diagnosis changed. In fact, previously, the prevailing view was strongly resistant against resecting colorectal liver metastases. Constant technical improvement of liver surgery and, much later, effective chemotherapy allowed for a successful wider application of surgery. The clinical use of portal vein embolization was the starting signal of regenerative liver surgery, where insufficient liver volume can be expanded to an extent where safe resection is possible. Today, a number of these techniques including portal vein ligation, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and bi-embolization (portal and hepatic vein) can be successfully used to address an insufficient future liver remnant in staged resections. It turned out that the road to success is embedding surgery in a well-orchestrated oncological concept of controlling systemic disease. This concept was the prerequisite that meant liver transplantation could enter the treatment strategy for colorectal liver metastases, ending up with a 5-year overall survival of 80% in highly selected cases. In particular, techniques combining principles of 2-stage hepatectomy and liver transplantation, such as "resection and partial liver segment 2-3 transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy" (RAPID) are on the rise. These techniques enable the use of partial liver grafts with primarily insufficient liver volume. All this progress also prompted a number of innovative local therapies to address recurrences ultimately transferring colorectal liver metastases from instantly deadly into a chronic disease in some cases.

Clinical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Synchronous Resectable Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Purpose

The survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to surgical resection in colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRCLM) patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare overall outcome of CRCLM patients who underwent NAC followed by surgical resection versus surgical treatment first.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 429 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases who underwent simultaneous liver resection between January 2008 and December 2016. Using propensity score matching, overall outcome between 60 patients who underwent NAC before surgical treatment and 60 patients who underwent surgical treatment first was compared.

Results

Before propensity score matching, metastatic cancer tended to involve a larger number of liver segments and the primary tumor size was bigger in the NAC group than in the primary resection group, so that a larger percentage of patients in the NAC group underwent major hepatectomy (P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, demographic features and pathologic outcomes showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. In addition, there was no significant difference in short-term recovery outcomes such as postoperative morbidity (P = 0.603) and oncologic outcome, including 3-year overall survival rate (P = 0.285) and disease-free survival rate (P = 0.730), between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

NAC prior to surgical treatment in CRCLM is considered a safe treatment that does not increase postoperative morbidity, and its impact on oncologic outcome was not inferior.

Intra-arterial therapy for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional trans-arterial chemoembolization (cTACE), drug-eluting embolic trans-arterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A search was conducted on EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science for prospective non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to 20^th June 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SR), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), while two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RR) and conversion-to-resection rates (CRR).

RESULTS

71 prospective non-randomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond first line, DEE-TACE+SCT (n=152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95%-CI: 22.5-29.1) months and 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95%-CI: 21.8-25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE+SCT appears to consistently have the highest pooled survival rates at 1-year (81.9%) and 2-years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015-2020). DEE-TACE+SCT and HAI+SCT had the highest pooled-RRs of 56.7% (I²=0.90) and 62.6% (I²=0.87) respectively and pooled-CRRs of 35.5% (I²=0.00) and 30.3% (I²=0.80) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Albeit significant heterogeneity, paucity of high-quality evidence and the non-comparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE+SCT may have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.

Parenchyma-sparing vessel-guided major hepatectomy: nonsense or new paradigm in liver surgery?

Advanced liver surgery.

Efficacy of modified bevacizumab-XELOX therapy in Japanese patients with stage IV recurrent or non-resectable colorectal cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been conducted for patients with non-resectable colorectal cancer; however, few reports of a systematic approach to NAC exist. At our hospital, bevacizumab with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (B-mab XELOX) has been used as chemotherapy for Stage IV colorectal cancer since 2014. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAC with a molecular-targeting agent for Stage IV colorectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective, single-institute analysis was performed including 27 patients with advanced recurrent cancer following primary tumor resection and 43 patients with non-resectable tumors and remote metastasis. At the time of resection, 17 were receiving chemotherapy. All 70 patients received at least 3 cycles of B-mab XELOX (total: 920 cycles). We determined the 1-year progression-free survival (1Y-PFS), 1-year overall survival (1Y-OS), 3Y-PFS, 3Y-OS, and number of treatment cycles. The objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, and adverse events were assessed. The number of chemotherapy cycles, survival time, and R0 surgery rate were determined for patients who underwent RO conversion surgery.

Results

The 1Y-PFS was 28.5% [median survival time (MST): 7.4 months], 1Y-OS was 76.6% (MST not reached), 3Y-PFS was 5.5% (MST: 7.4 months), and 3Y-OS was 26.4% (MST: 25.2 months). The mean and median number of cycles of B-mab XELOX was 13.1 and 10.5, respectively. The objective response rate was 28.6%, and the clinical benefit rate was 58.6%. Grade 1 or Grade 2 adverse events occurred in 60 patients (85.7%); however, they all resolved without intervention. A single Grade 4 event (perforation of the primary tumor) occurred in 1 patient (1.4%). RO conversion surgery was performed in 7 patients (10.0%; primary + liver in 2 patients, primary + lung in 1 patient, liver in 3 patients, and primary in 1 patient). These patients received 3 to 10 cycles preoperatively (mean: 7.3; median: 6.5). R0 surgery was achieved in 5 of the 7 patients (71.4%). Postoperative survival ranged from 1 to 26 months (MST: 8 months).

Conclusions

This modified regimen was safe and effective in Japanese patients, and a high quality of life/quality-adjusted life-year was achieved. To further evaluate PFS and OS, more patients are being investigated.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Pumps: What the Radiologist Needs to Know

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) entails the surgical implantation of a subcutaneous pump to deliver chemotherapeutic agents directly to the liver in the setting of primary or secondary liver cancer. The purpose of HAI chemotherapy is to maximize hepatic drug concentrations while minimizing systemic toxicity, facilitating more effective treatment. HAI is used in combination with systemic chemotherapy and can be considered in several clinical scenarios, including adjuvant therapy, conversion of unresectable disease to resectable disease, and unresectable disease. Radiologists are key members of the multidisciplinary team involved in the selection and management of these patients with complex liver disease. As these devices begin to be used at more sites across the country, radiologists should become familiar with the guiding principles behind pump placement, expected imaging appearances of these devices, and potential associated complications. The authors provide an overview of HAI therapy, with a focus on the key imaging findings associated with this treatment that radiologists may encounter. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Conversion Therapy of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Is Associated with Improved Prognosis and Verified by a Case of Patient-Derived Organoid

Simple Summary

The first core tip of this study is that we summarized the experience of conversion therapy of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) in a single center and found conversion therapy could provide a significant improvement in the overall survival of patients with IHCC. Previous studies mainly focused on case reports and case series, and our research provided more evidence for the efficacy of conversion therapy in IHCC. The second is that we established the organoid of IHCC for drug screening and firstly verified the results of drug screening tests in cancer organoid were consistent with the levels of efficacy observed in the patient from whom it was derived. Cancer organoid is a promising technology for conversion therapy according to our study but more organoids are still needed.

Abstract

This study was performed to determine the efficacy of conversion therapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and explore the feasibility of cancer organoid to direct the conversion therapy of IHCC. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed in this study and cancer organoids were established using tissues obtained from two patients. A total of 42 patients with IHCC received conversion therapy, 9 of whom were downstaged successfully, and another 157 patients were initially resectable. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the successfully downstaged patients had a significantly improved overall survival compared to those in whom downstaging was unsuccessful (p = 0.017), and had a similar overall survival to that of initially resectable patients (p = 0.965). The IHCC organoid was successfully established from one of two obtained tissues. Routine hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistological staining found the organoid retained the histopathological characteristics of the original tissues. Whole exome sequencing results indicated the IHCC organoid retained appropriately 87% of the variants in the original tissue. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel exhibited the strongest inhibitory effects on the cancer organoid as determined using drug screening tests, consistent with the levels of efficacy observed in the patient from whom it was derived. This study indicates that conversion therapy could improve the survival of patients with IHCC despite its low success rate, and it may be directed by cancer organoids though this is merely a proof of feasibility.

Association between imaging response and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

The association between the imaging response (structural or metabolic) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (neoCT) before colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and survival is unclear.

METHOD

A total of 201 patients underwent their first CRLM resection. A total of 94 (47%) patients were treated with neoCT. A multivariable, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between response groups.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analysis of the CT/MRI (n = 94) group showed no difference in survival (OS and PFS) in patients who had stable disease/partial response (SD/PR) or complete response (CR) versus patients who had progressive disease (PD) (OS: HR, 0.36 (95% CI: 0.11-1.19) p = .094, HR, 0.78 (95% CI: 0.13-4.50) p = .780, respectively), (PFS: HR, 0.70 (95% CI: 0.36-1.35) p = .284, HR, 0.51 (0.18-1.45) p = .203, respectively). In the FDG-PET group (n = 60) there was no difference in the hazard of death for patients with SD/PR or CR versus patients with PD for OS or PFS except for the PFS in the small CR subgroup (OS: HR, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.11-4.88) p = .759, HR, 1.21 (95% CI: 0.15-9.43) p = .857), (PFS: HR, 0.34% (95% CI: 0.09-1.22), p = .097, HR, 0.17 (95% CI: 0.04-0.62) p = .008, respectively).

CONCLUSION

There was no convincing evidence of association between imaging response to neoCT and survival following CRLM resection.

The Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Repeat Local Treatment of Recurrent Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The additive value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) prior to repeat local treatment of patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is unclear. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and an additional search in Google Scholar to find articles comparing repeat local treatment by partial hepatectomy and/or thermal ablation with versus without NAC. The search included randomized trials and comparative observational studies with univariate/multivariate analysis and/or matching as well as (inter)national guidelines assessed using the AGREE II instrument. The search identified 21,832 records; 172 were selected for full-text review; 20 were included: 20 comparative observational studies were evaluated. Literature to evaluate the additive value of NAC prior to repeat local treatment was limited. Outcomes of NAC were often reported as subgroup analyses and reporting of results was frequently unclear. Assessment of the seven studies that qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis showed conflicting results. Only one study reported a significant difference in overall survival (OS) favoring NAC prior to repeat local treatment. However, further analysis revealed a high risk for residual bias, because only a selected group of chemo-responders qualified for repeat local treatment, disregarding the non-responders who did not qualify. All guidelines that specifically mention recurrent disease (3/3) recommend repeat local treatment; none provide recommendations about the role of NAC. The inconclusive findings of this meta-analysis do not support recommendations to routinely favor NAC prior to repeat local treatment. This emphasizes the need to investigate the additive value of NAC prior to repeat local treatment of patients with recurrent CRLM in a future phase 3 randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Prognostic Value of the Site of Distant Metastasis and Surgical Interventions in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Studies on the prognostic significance of site-specific distant metastasis, multiple-site metastases, and the impact of surgery of the primary tumor and metastatic lesion on survival outcomes of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC) remain elusive. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the site of distant metastasis among patients with metastatic GC. Furthermore, the effect of surgery of the primary tumor and metastatic lesion on the prognosis of metastatic GC was also analyzed.

METHODS

The data of 4,221 eligible patients, who were diagnosed with metastatic GC between 2010 and 2015, were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between potential prognostic factors, including the site of metastasis and surgery, and survival of patients with metastatic GC. Overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences were assessed using the Log-rank test.

RESULTS

Out of the total 4,221 GC patients with definite organ metastases, 3312 patients had single-site metastasis while 909 patients had multiple-site metastases. GC patients with single-site metastasis of liver or lung exhibited better CSS and OS compared to those with bone metastasis. Furthermore, GC patients with liver metastasis benefited from surgery of both the primary and metastatic lesions, while those with lung metastasis benefited from surgery of metastasis resection only. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that GC patients with single-site metastasis, well-differentiated tumors, GC patients who underwent surgery of the primary tumor and those who received chemotherapy exhibited favorable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The site of metastasis was an independent prognostic factor for metastatic GC. Surgery had survival benefits in certain cases of metastatic GC; however, further studies are warranted to clarify these benefits in carefully selected patients.

The value of a dedicated multidisciplinary expert panel to assess treatment strategy in patients suffering from colorectal cancer liver metastases

BACKGROUND

For patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), local treatment is the only treatment with curative intent. The majority of patients with CRLM are however evaluated in multidisciplinary teams of colorectal cancer specialists often lacking expertise in local treatment of liver tumors. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the value of a dedicated multidisciplinary panel consisting of hepatobiliary surgeons and interventional radiologists for patients suffering from liver-only CRLM.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with liver-only CRLM in 2016 were identified in a tertiary referral hospital, and two of the referring hospitals in the Netherlands. Diagnostic imaging was independently reviewed by a panel of four hepatobiliary surgeons and two interventional radiologists to re-evaluate treatment strategy retrospectively. If two or more panelists assessed all lesions eligible for resection and/or ablation, patients were deemed eligible for local treatment with curative intent. Interrater reliability between hepatobiliary surgeons was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

Diagnostic imaging of 61 patients with liver-only metastases were reviewed. Local treatment strategies appeared feasible in 40/61 (65.6%) patients. Five out of 25 patients (20.0%) initially assigned to systemic therapy were deemed eligible for upfront local treatment with curative intent (p = 0.015). In this subgroup, interrater reliability between hepatobiliary surgeons was substantial (ICC: 0.704, 95% CI: 0.536-0.838, n = 25).

CONCLUSION

Assessment of treatment strategy by a dedicated multidisciplinary panel including liver experts may result in an increased number of patients eligible for potentially curative treatment and reduce undertreatment of patients suffering from liver-only CRLM.

Contemporary Imaging of the Surgically Placed Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Pump

Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy is a locoregional treatment strategy for hepatic malignancy involving placement of a surgically implanted pump or percutaneous port-catheter device into a branch of the hepatic artery. HAI has been used for metastatic colorectal cancer for decades but has recently attracted new attention because of its potential impact on survival, when combined with systemic therapy, in patients presenting with unresectable hepatic disease. Although various HAI device-related complications have been described, little attention has been given to their appearance on imaging. Radiologists are uniquely positioned to identify these complications given that patients receiving HAI therapy typically undergo frequent imaging and may have complications that are delayed or clinically unsuspected. Therefore, this article reviews the multimodality imaging considerations of surgically implanted HAI devices. The role of imaging in routine perioperative assessment, including the normal postoperative appearance of the device, is described. The imaging findings of potential complications, including pump pocket complications, catheter or arterial complications, and toxic or ischemic complications, are presented, with a focus on CT. Familiarity with the device and its complications will aid radiologists in playing an important role in the treatment of patients undergoing HAI therapy.