Autologous versus allogeneic transfusion in aortic surgery: a multicenter randomized clinical trial

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety and availability of transfused donor blood have prompted research into a range of techniques to minimise allogeneic transfusion requirements. Cell salvage (CS) describes the recovery of blood from the surgical field, either during or after surgery, for reinfusion back to the patient.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of CS in minimising perioperative allogeneic red blood cell transfusion and on other clinical outcomes in adults undergoing elective or non-urgent surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases and two clinical trials registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews from 2009 (date of previous search) to 19 January 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs assessing the use of CS compared to no CS in adults (participants aged 18 or over, or using the study's definition of adult) undergoing elective (non-urgent) surgery only.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 106 RCTs, incorporating data from 14,528 participants, reported in studies conducted in 24 countries. Results were published between 1978 and 2021. We analysed all data according to a single comparison: CS versus no CS. We separated analyses by type of surgery. The certainty of the evidence varied from very low certainty to high certainty. Reasons for downgrading the certainty included imprecision (small sample sizes below the optimal information size required to detect a difference, and wide confidence intervals), inconsistency (high statistical heterogeneity), and risk of bias (high risk from domains including sequence generation, blinding, and baseline imbalances). Aggregate analysis (all surgeries combined: primary outcome only) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if there is a reduction in the risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS (risk ratio (RR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.72; 82 RCTs, 12,520 participants). Cancer: 2 RCTs (79 participants) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for mortality, blood loss, infection, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). There were no analysable data reported for the remaining outcomes. Cardiovascular (vascular): 6 RCTs (384 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for most outcomes. No data were reported for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cardiovascular (no bypass): 6 RCTs (372 participants) Moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is probably a reduction in risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97; 3 RCTs, 169 participants). Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a difference for volume transfused, blood loss, mortality, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hospital length of stay (LOS). There were no analysable data reported for thrombosis, DVT, pulmonary embolism (PE), and MACE. Cardiovascular (with bypass): 29 RCTs (2936 participants) Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be a reduction in the risk of allogeneic transfusion with CS, and suggests there may be no difference in risk of infection and hospital LOS. Very low- to moderate-certainty evidence means we are uncertain whether there is a reduction in volume transfused because of CS, or if there is any difference for mortality, blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, wound complication, thrombosis, DVT, PE, MACE, and MI, and probably no difference in risk of stroke. Obstetrics: 1 RCT (1356 participants) High-certainty evidence shows there is no difference between groups for mean volume of allogeneic blood transfused (mean difference (MD) -0.02 units, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.04; 1 RCT, 1349 participants). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be no difference for risk of allogeneic transfusion. There were no analysable data reported for the remaining outcomes. Orthopaedic (hip only): 17 RCTs (2055 participants) Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if CS reduces the risk of allogeneic transfusion, and the volume transfused, or if there is any difference between groups for mortality, blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, prosthetic joint infection (PJI), thrombosis, DVT, PE, stroke, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for MACE and MI. Orthopaedic (knee only): 26 RCTs (2568 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if CS reduces the risk of allogeneic transfusion, and the volume transfused, and whether there is a difference for blood loss, re-operation for bleeding, infection, wound complication, PJI, DVT, PE, MI, MACE, stroke, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for mortality and thrombosis. Orthopaedic (spine only): 6 RCTs (404 participants) Moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is probably a reduction in the need for allogeneic transfusion with CS (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.63; 3 RCTs, 194 participants). Very low- to moderate-certainty evidence suggests there may be no difference for volume transfused, blood loss, infection, wound complication, and PE. There were no analysable data reported for mortality, re-operation for bleeding, PJI, thrombosis, DVT, MACE, MI, stroke, and hospital LOS. Orthopaedic (mixed): 14 RCTs (4374 participants) Very low- to low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain if there is a reduction in the need for allogeneic transfusion with CS, or if there is any difference between groups for volume transfused, mortality, blood loss, infection, wound complication, PJI, thrombosis, DVT, MI, and hospital LOS. There were no analysable data reported for re-operation for bleeding, MACE, and stroke.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In some types of elective surgery, cell salvage may reduce the need for and volume of allogeneic transfusion, alongside evidence of no difference in adverse events, when compared to no cell salvage. Further research is required to establish why other surgeries show no benefit from CS, through further analysis of the current evidence. More large RCTs in under-reported specialities are needed to expand the evidence base for exploring the impact of CS.

Decreased Transfusion Requirements with Use of Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution in Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVES

Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is an operative blood conservation technique involving the removal and storage of patient blood after induction of anesthesia, while maintaining normovolemia with crystalloid and/or colloid replacement. Developed and used predominately in cardiac surgery, ANH has been applied to the vascular surgery population but data regarding impact on transfusion requirements in this population is limited. The objective of this study is to compare transfusion requirements and coagulopathy in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (oAAA) employing ANH to those receiving only product replacement as clinically indicated.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients undergoing elective oAAA at a quaternary aortic referral center from 2017-2019. Those eligible for ANH, no active cardiac ischemia, no valvular disease, normal LV/RV function, CKD < stage 3, HCT > 38%, normal coagulation profile, were included in the study. Patient demographics and characteristics were collected as were operative variables including extent of aneurysm, clamp site, visceral/renal ischemia time, operative time, and transfusion requirements. Post-operative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed. Patients with and without ANH were matched and compared. Continuous measures were analyzed with Wilcoxon rank sum tests and t-tests.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 209 oAAA were performed, 76 patients met inclusion criteria; 27 patients underwent ANH while 49 did not. Patients with ANH had less PRBC transfusion intraoperative (Median [25^th,75^th]: 0 [0,1] vs. 1[0,2] units, p=0.02), at 24 hours(0[0,1] vs. 1[0,2] units, p=0.008), at 48 hours (0[0,1] vs. 1[0,2], p=0.007) and throughout the admission (0[0,1] vs. 2[0,2], p=0.011). There was no difference in intraoperative platelet or cryoprecipitate transfusions. At 48-hours, ANH had significantly higher platelet counts (142 ±35.8 vs. 124±37.6 x10(3)/mcL, p=0.044), lower PTT, and lower INR. There was no difference in MI, RTOR, or mortality (1 death overall). ANH patients had shorter LOS (7.0±2.7 vs 8.8±4.8 days, p=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

ANH during oAAA results in less intraoperative and post-operative PRBC with improved coagulation parameters and a shorter hospital LOS.

Effect of intraoperative autologous transfusion techniques on perioperative hemoglobin level in idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion: A prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Massive blood loss during posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis remains a significant risk for patients. There is no consensus on the benefit of acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) or intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to one of two groups. Group A received ANH and ICS during operation, while group B received only ICS. Patients' age, sex, height, weight, body blood volume, number of fusion level, Cobb angle, number of screws, duration of surgery, and skin incision length were recorded. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels were obtained preoperatively and postoperatively (0 h and 24 h).

RESULTS

There were 22 patients in each group. There was no significant difference in total blood loss. The perioperative decrease in hemoglobin levels between preoperation and postoperation 24 h (group A 2.79 ± 1.15 and group B 2.76 ± 1.00) showed no significant difference ( p = 0.93). Group A observed a larger decrease in hemoglobin levels at postoperative 0 h relative to preoperative level (2.57 ± 0.82 g/dl), followed by a smaller decrease within the next 24 h (0.22 ± 1.33 g/dl). Group B showed a continued drop in hemoglobin levels of similar magnitude at postoperation 0 h (1.60 ± 0.67 g/dl) and within the next 24 h (1.16 ± 0.78 g/dl). One patient from group B received 1 unit of allogenic blood transfusion ( p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ANH to ICS in posterior spinal fusion surgery for AIS resulted in a similar decrease in hemoglobin levels between preoperative values and at 24 h postoperatively.

Effects of a targeted blood management programme on allogeneic blood transfusion in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of a dedicated cell salvage practitioner team on blood loss and allogeneic transfusion in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery.

BACKGROUND

Cell salvage reduces allogeneic transfusion in AAA surgery, but is commonly performed by the anaesthetic nurse. At our hospital, a dedicated patient blood management practitioner is present for all elective open AAA repairs.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Data were collected on 171 AAA patients operated on at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford over a 3-year period, looking at the Patient Blood Management processes, including: blood loss, cell salvage, near-patient testing (thrombelastography) and transfusion rates of allogeneic blood products.

RESULTS

Blood loss ranged from 3-108% of estimated blood volume (EBV) (median 25% = 1500 mL). In seven patients who lost 70-110% of their EBV, none reached the thrombelastography intervention threshold for R time (11 min) or MA (48 mm) despite such massive blood loss. Overall, only 7/171 (4%) patients received intra-operative allogeneic blood, all of whom had a mean baseline haemoglobin concentration < 106 g L^-1 (median 98, range 95-105 g L^-1 ). In terms of other blood products, only 4/171 (2·3%) received one unit of platelets each intra-operatively. None received FFP or cryoprecipitate.

CONCLUSIONS

Such low levels of allogeneic transfusion have not been reported previously. We hypothesise that this is due to the additional blood management contributions of the specialised cell salvage practitioners and collaboration with the rest of the vascular surgical team. These results support the development of pre-operative anaemia clinics. Overall the service runs at a profit to the trust.

Can Hospital Transfusion Committees Change Transfusion Practice?

Blood and blood products are commonly over-used in hospital practice. We investigated whether the introduction of a red-cell transfusion trigger (haemoglobin <8 g dL–1) influenced transfusion practice in surgery. Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs, n=400), total hip replacements (n=107), colectomies (n=85) and transurethral prostatectomies (TURPs, n=158) were reviewed over two periods of six months, before and after the introduction of the policy by the local hospital transfusion committee.

After introduction of the policy, the proportion of patients transfused fell from 57% to 45% with CABGs (P=0.02) and from 52% to 26% with hip replacements (P=0.006); for colectomies and TURPs there was no change. Hospital stay did not increase in any of the groups. In the second period, haemoglobin concentration on discharge was lower after total hip replacement, by a mean (95% CI) of 0.7 (0.3–1.2) g dL–1 (P=0.002) and after colectomy, by a mean of 0.6 (0.1–1.1) g dL–1 (P=0.03).

Although other factors cannot be excluded, we suggest that the reductions in red-cell transfusion were in large part attributable to the new transfusion policy.

Intraoperative blood salvage may shorten the lifespan of red blood cells within 3 days postoperatively: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) recovers most lost blood, and is widely used in the clinic. It is unclear why IBS does not reduce long-term postoperative requirements for red blood cells (RBCs), and 1 possibility is that IBS affects RBC lifespan.

METHODS

Prospectively enrolled patients who underwent spine, pelvic, or femur surgery not involving allogeneic RBC transfusion were grouped based on whether they received IBS or not. Volumes of blood lost and of RBCs salvaged during surgery were recorded. Total blood cell counts, levels of plasma-free hemoglobin, and CD235a-positive granulocytes were determined perioperatively.

RESULTS

Although intraoperative blood loss was higher in the IBS group (n = 45) than in the non-IBS group (n = 52) (P < .001), hemoglobin levels were similar between groups (P = .125) at the end of surgery. Hemoglobin levels increased in non-IBS patients (4 ± 11 g/L), but decreased in IBS patients (-7 ± 12 g/L) over the first 3 postoperative days. Nadir hemoglobin levels after surgery were higher in the non-IBS group (107 ± 12 g/L) than in the IBS group (91 ± 12 g/L). Salvaged RBC volume correlated with hemoglobin decrease (r = 0.422, P = .004). In multivariate analysis, salvaged RBC volume was an independent risk factor for hemoglobin decrease (adjusted odds ratio 1.002, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.004, P = .008). Flow cytometry showed the numbers of CD235a-positive granulocytes after surgery to be higher in the IBS group than in the non-IBS group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

IBS may shorten the lifespan of RBCs by triggering their engulfment upon re-infusion (China Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-OCH-14005140).

Blood transfusion and coagulation management

Despite impressive progress in surgical technique, aortic surgery is still associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality. One of the most important contributors to this phenomenon is the triad of bleeding, anemia, and transfusion. All three factors are known to influence the outcome of aortic surgery to a great extent. However, over the last few years a multidisciplinary, multimodal concept has been established, which enables the physician to avoid bleeding, anemia, and transfusion as much as possible. The concept of "patient blood management" combines several established measures with the potential to improve perioperative outcome. This chapter describes these measures with regard to aortic surgery and assesses their respective efficacy.

Minorities are less likely to receive autologous blood transfusion for major elective orthopaedic surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgeons commonly arrange for patients to perform autologous blood donation before elective orthopaedic surgery. Understanding sociodemographic patterns of use of autologous blood transfusion can help improve quality of care and cost containment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought to determine whether there were (1) racial disparities, (2) insurance-based disparities, or (3) income-based disparities in autologous blood use. Additionally, we evaluated the combined effect of (4) race and insurance and (5) race and income on autologous blood use, and we compared ratios of autologous with allogeneic blood use.

METHODS

Of the more than 3,500,000 patients undergoing major elective orthopaedic surgery identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2008 and 2011, 2.4% received autologous blood transfusion and 12% received allogeneic blood transfusion. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the influence of race, insurance status, and income on autologous blood use.

RESULTS

Compared with white patients, Hispanic patients had lower odds of autologous blood use for elective hip (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69-0.82) and knee arthroplasties (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75). Black patients had lower odds of receiving autologous blood transfusion for hip arthroplasty (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83). Compared with the privately insured, uninsured and publicly insured patients were less likely to receive autologous blood for total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion. Patients with low and medium income were less likely to have autologous blood transfusion for total joint arthroplasty and spinal fusion compared with high-level income earners. Even at comparable income and insurance levels with whites, Hispanic and black patients tended to be less likely to receive autologous blood transfusion. Ratios of autologous to allogeneic blood use were lower among minority patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Historically disadvantaged populations receive fewer autologous blood transfusions for elective orthopaedic surgery. Whether the differential use is attributable to patient preference or unequal access to this practice should be investigated further.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prognostic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Allogeneic blood transfusions and postoperative infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Up to 70% of patients who undergo total hip or total knee arthroplasty receive blood transfusions. Using data from more than 12,000 patients assessed in the Phase-III RECORD (Regulation of Coagulation in Orthopedic Surgery to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism) studies, we investigated whether allogeneic blood transfusion increases the risk of postoperative infection compared with autologous blood transfusion or no transfusion.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of the pooled RECORD data stratified patients into three groups according to the type of blood transfusion that they received: no transfusion (n = 6313), autologous blood transfusion (n = 1902), and allogeneic blood transfusion with or without autologous blood transfusion (n = 3962). The types of postoperative infection were recorded and included lower or upper respiratory tract and lung infection, bone and joint infection, wound inflammation or infection, urinary tract infection, and other infections.

RESULTS

The rates of infection in patients receiving no transfusion or autologous blood transfusion were similar; therefore, data from these two groups were combined. The rate of any infection was 9.9% (392 of 3962) in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion and 7.9% (646 of 8215) in patients not receiving allogeneic blood transfusion with or without autologous blood transfusion (p = 0.003). The rates of lower or upper respiratory tract and lung infection (2.1% [eighty-five of 3962] versus 1.3% [109 of 8215]; p = 0.002) and of wound inflammation or infection (2.4% [ninety-four of 3962] versus 1.7% [138 of 8215]; p = 0.046) were significantly higher in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion compared with patients not receiving allogeneic blood transfusion. When comparing patients who had received allogeneic blood transfusion with those who had not received allogeneic blood transfusion, the rates of bone and joint infection (0.4% [fourteen of 3962] versus 0.2% [eighteen of 8215]; p = 0.056), of urinary tract infection (3.1% [123 of 3962] versus 2.5% [209 of 8215]; p = 0.551), and of other infections (3.0% [120 of 3962] versus 2.7% [225 of 8215]; p = 0.308) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of any infection, lower or upper respiratory tract and lung infection, and wound inflammation or infection were significantly increased after elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty in patients receiving allogeneic blood transfusion compared with those receiving autologous blood transfusion or no blood transfusion.

An analysis of the influence of intra-operative blood salvage and autologous transfusion on reducing the need for allogeneic transfusion in elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND

An intra-operative cell salvage machine, commonly known as a "cell saver", aspirates, washes, and filters patient's blood during an operation so that the blood can be returned to the patient's circulation instead of being discarded. This procedure could significantly reduce the risks related to the use of allogeneic blood and blood products in surgery. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of intra-operative cell salvage on reducing the need for allogeneic blood in patients with asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm undergoing elective repair of the aneurysm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from the clinical records of patients who underwent elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Two groups were formed: the "cell saver" group, in which intra-operative cell salvage was used, and the control group, in which a cell saver was not used.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with the use of a cell saver, while 32 underwent the same operation without cell salvage. We found a significant association between use of the cell saver and a reduced need for allogeneic blood in these patients. Operations performed with the use of a cell saver lasted, on average, less time than those performed without it. The difference between pre-operative and post-operative haemoglobin levels was significantly greater in the group of patients who underwent repair with the use of a cell saver than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The use of a cell saver in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair significantly reduces the need for intra-operative use of allogeneic blood.

Blood conservation strategies in orthopedic surgeries: A review

In orthopedics management of surgical blood loss is an important aspect which has evolved along with modern surgeries. Replacement of lost blood by transfusion alone is not the answer as was considered earlier. Complications like infection and immune reaction due to blood transfusion are a major concern. Today numerous techniques are available in place of allogenic blood transfusion which can be employed safely and effectively. In this article we have reviewed these techniques, their merits and demerits.

Reduction in Allogeneic Blood Products With Routine Use of Autotransfusion in Open Elective Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background and objectives:

Concern about allogeneic blood product cost and complications has prompted interest in blood conservation techniques. Intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT) is currently not used routinely by vascular surgeons in open elective infrareanl abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The objective of this study is to review our experience with IAT and its impact on blood transfusion.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients treated electively over a 4-year period and compared 2 strategy related to IAT, routine use IAT (rIAT) versus on-demand IAT (oIAT). Outcomes measured were number of units of allogeneic red blood cells and autologous red blood cells transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively, preoperative, postoperative, and discharge hemoglobin levels; postoperative infections; length of postoperative intensive care stay; and length of hospital stay. T-independent and Fisher exact test were used.

Results:

A total of 212 patients were included, 38 (18%) in the rIAT and 174 (82%) in the oIAT. Groups were similar except for an inferior creatinine and a superior mean aneurysm diameter for the rIAT group. Patients in the rIAT group had a lower rate of transfusion (26% vs 54%, P = .002) and a lower mean number of blood unit transfused (0.8 vs 1.8, P = .048). These findings were still more significant for AAA larger than 60 mm (18% rIAT vs 62% oIAT, P = .0001). Postoperative hemoglobin was superior in the rIAT group (107 vs 101 g/L, P = .01). Mean postoperative intensive care length of stay was shorter for the rIAT group (1.1 vs 1.8 days, P = .01). No difference was noted for infection, mortality, or hospital length of stay.

Conclusion:

The rIAT reduced the exposure to allogeneic blood products by more than 50%, in particular for patients with AAA larger than 60 mm. These results support the use of rIAT for open elective infrarenal AAA repair.

Proinflammatory cytokines and complement activation in salvaged blood from abdominal aortic aneurism surgery and total hip replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Levels of proinflammatory mediators in unwashed salvaged blood from abdominal aortic aneurism (AAA) surgery are unknown. We hypothesized that there are higher levels of these mediators in unwashed blood salvaged in AAA surgery compared to hip replacement surgery.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten patients scheduled for AAA surgery (Group A) and 10 patients for total hip replacement surgery (Group H) were included. Blood samples from the autotransfusion set were obtained during surgery and arterial samples before, during, and 6 hours after surgery. Determination of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, activated complement 3 (C3a), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were performed. Salvaged blood was not retransfused.

RESULTS

Levels (median [range]) of IL-8 in blood in the salvage system were higher in Group A versus Group H (215.3 [22.5-697.2] vs. 35.3 [16.7-66.6] pg/mL; p = 0.002). Higher levels of IL-6 were also seen in Group A versus Group H (60.0 [52.6-62.2] vs. 42.34 [19.4-62.2] pg/mL; p = 0.049). Levels of IL-6 in blood sampled during surgery were approximately fivefold higher in Group A versus Group H (p = 0.023), whereas approximately 70% higher levels of C3a were observed in Group H versus Group A (p = 0.021). Postoperative concentrations of IL-1β (p = 0.002), IL-6 (p = 0.001), and IL-8 (0.005) were higher in Group A versus Group H.

CONCLUSION

Salvaged blood in AAA surgery contains substantially higher levels of proinflammatory mediators compared to blood in total hip replacement surgery.

Laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection with intraoperative splenic blood salvage

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative blood salvage can reduce or avoid perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Salvaging the blood in the portal hypertension-induced enlarged spleen becomes an issue of concern during devascularization surgery because an enlarged spleen accommodates a large red cell pool. We report 20 cases of laparoscopic splenectomy and azygoportal disconnection and present the advantages of the use of intraoperative splenic blood salvage during the procedure.

METHODS

A total of 20 cirrhotic patients with esophagogastric variceal bleeding refractory to treatment with β-blockers and endoscopic therapy were studied. Laparoscopic splenectomy with azygoportal disconnection was performed. During the procedure, an intraoperative autologous blood salvage device recovered the splenic blood. The perioperative data were recorded from various viewpoints.

RESULTS

The operative time was 3.1 ± 0.3 h and the blood loss was 70.5 ± 32.5 ml. The weight of the excised and morcellated spleen was 826.0 ± 155.1 g. The volume of autotransfused blood was 541.0 ± 150.4 ml. No patient received a perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. There were no significant complications either intraoperatively or postoperatively. The hemoglobin value increased from 9.3 ± 0.8 to 11.5 ± 1.1 g/dl at postoperative day 1 (p < 0.01). During a postoperative follow-up period of 18.0 ± 9.0 months for 18 patients, neither esophageal variceal bleeding nor encephalopathy recurred.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic splenectomy with azygoportal disconnection is a feasible, effective, and safe surgical method for the treatment of bleeding portal hypertension. Intraoperative splenic blood salvage can avoid the risk associated with allogeneic transfusion during the procedure, with an advantage of significantly increased postoperative hemoglobin levels.

[The "Seville" Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion. Sociedades españolas de Anestesiología (SEDAR), Medicina Intensiva (SEMICYUC), Hematología y Hemoterapia (AEHH), Transfusión sanguínea (SETS) Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH)]

The Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion (AABT) has been drawn up by a panel of experts from 5 scientific societies. The Spanish Societies of Anesthesiology (SEDAR), Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), Hematology and Hemotherapy (AEHH), Blood Transfusion (SETS) and Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) have sponsored and participated in this Consensus Document. Alternatives to blood transfusion have been divided into pharmacological and non-pharmacological, with 4 modules and 12 topics. The main objective variable was the reduction of allogenic blood transfusions and/or the number of transfused patients. The extent to which this objective was achieved by each AABT was evaluated using the Delphi method, which classifies the grade of recommendation from A (supported by controlled studies) to E (non-controlled studies and expert opinion). The experts concluded that most of the indications for AABT were based on middle or low grades of recommendation, "C", "D", or "E", thus indicating the need for further controlled studies.

Is use of a Continuous Autotransfusion System beneficial in emergency abdominal aortic aneursym (AAA) surgery?

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic blood products have become a limited and expensive resource. The Continuous Autotransfusion System (CATS) has been promoted as a method for reducing the need for allogeneic blood transfusion. This study was undertaken to ascertain whether the use of CATS in emergency open AAA surgery has any benefits.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients undergoing emergency open AAA surgery in our center during a 5-year period (between July 2004 and July 2009). Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained vascular database, and data were obtained from patient records.

RESULTS

CATS was used in 69 emergency open AAA repairs. The median total blood loss was 3,500 mL (range: 751-13,796 mL) but the median volume of packed red blood cells produced by CATS was only 493 mL (~ 2 U). An average of 7 U (range: 0-19 U) of bank blood was still used despite the availability of CATS. The mean hemoglobin 24 hours postoperatively was 10.3 g/dL (6.4-14.1) with a hematocrit of 0.30.

CONCLUSION

The use of CATS in emergency AAA surgery does not seem to reduce the use of allogeneic blood transfusion. This may be because of over transfusion, as reflected by relatively high postoperative hemoglobin levels.

Does use of intraoperative cell-salvage delay recovery in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic surgery?

A best evidence topic in vascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the use of intraoperative cell-salvage (ICS) leads to negative outcomes in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic surgery? Altogether 305 papers were found using the reported search, of which 10 were judged to represent the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers were tabulated. None of the 10 papers included in the analysis demonstrated that ICS use led to significantly higher incidence of cardiac or septic postoperative complications. Similarly, length of intensive treatment unit (ITU) or hospital stay and mortality in elective abdominal aortic surgery were not adversely affected. Indeed two trials actually show a significantly shorter hospital stay after ICS use, one a shorter ITU stay and another suggests lower rates of chest sepsis. Based on these papers, we concluded that the use of ICS does not cause increased morbidity or mortality when compared to standard practise of transfusion of allogenic blood, and may actually improve some clinical outcomes. As abdominal aortic surgery inevitably causes significant intraoperative blood loss, in the range of 661-3755 ml as described in the papers detailed in this review, ICS is a useful and safe strategy to minimise use of allogenic blood.

Alternative procedures for reducing allogeneic blood transfusion in elective orthopedic surgery

Perioperative blood loss is a major problem in elective orthopedic surgery. Allogeneic transfusion is the standard treatment for perioperative blood loss resulting in low postoperative hemoglobin, but it has a number of well-recognized risks, complications, and costs. Alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion include preoperative autologous donation and intraoperative salvage with postoperative autotransfusion. Orthopedic surgeons are often unaware of the different pre- and intraoperative possibilities of reducing blood loss and leave the management of coagulation and use of blood products completely to the anesthesiologists. The goal of this review is to compare alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion from an orthopedic and anesthesia point of view focusing on estimated costs and acceptance by both parties.

Cell salvage as part of a blood conservation strategy in anaesthesia

The use of intraoperative cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion has become an important method of blood conservation. The main aim of autologous transfusion is to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and its associated complications. Allogeneic blood transfusion has been associated with increased risk of tumour recurrence, postoperative infection, acute lung injury, perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative low-output cardiac failure, and increased mortality. We have reviewed the current evidence for cell salvage in modern surgical practice and examined the controversial issues, such as the use of cell salvage in obstetrics, and in patients with malignancy, or intra-abdominal or systemic sepsis. Cell salvage has been demonstrated to be safe and effective at reducing allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in adult elective surgery, with stronger evidence in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. Prolonged use of cell salvage with large-volume autotransfusion may be associated with dilution of clotting factors and thrombocytopenia, and regular laboratory or near-patient monitoring is required, along with appropriate blood product use. Cell salvage should be considered in all cases where significant blood loss (>1000 ml) is expected or possible, where patients refuse allogeneic blood products or they are anaemic. The use of cell salvage in combination with a leucocyte depletion filter appears to be safe in obstetrics and cases of malignancy; however, further trials are required before definitive guidance may be provided. The only absolute contraindication to the use of cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion is patient refusal.

Intravenous fluids for abdominal aortic surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgery on the abdominal aorta to treat aneurysms or occlusive disease is a major undertaking which requires intensive physiological support and fluid management. Blood products are often used but the main fluid replacement is with crystalloids or colloids. For years there has been controversy over which fluid is optimal and a number of studies have examined the subject. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2000 and previously updated in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of different non-blood replacement fluids used in abdominal aorta procedures with a view to identifying the optimal fluid for use.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group searched their Specialised Register (August 2009) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 3) for publications describing randomised controlled trials of non-blood replacement fluids in abdominal aortic surgery. In addition, the reference lists from retrieved trials were screened for further information about trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of at least one specific non-blood fluid used for replacement therapy in operations on, and confined to, the abdominal aorta.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and then entered into the Review Manager software where statistical analyses were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-eight trials involving 1589 patients were included. Patients undergoing aortic surgery had various physiological parameters measured before and after their operation (these were cardiac, respiratory, haematological, and biochemical). Patients were randomised to a fluid type. This review demonstrated that no single fluid affects any outcome measure significantly more than another fluid across a range of outcomes. The death rate in these studies was 2.45% (39 patients).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite the confirmed beneficial effects of colloids in this review, further studies are still required. There are no studies examining the effects of combination fluid therapy. The primary research outcome was death, for which results were limited; therefore, future studies should pay more attention to short-term outcomes such as minimising the need for allogenic blood transfusion, complications (organ failure), and length of stay in both the intensive care unit and hospital.

Intraoperative Cell Salvage versus Allogeneic Transfusion during Abdominal Aortic Surgery: Clinical and Financial Outcomes

The objective of this study was to assess the clinical and financial outcomes of intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) during abdominal aortic surgery. In this study, 90 patients were operated on with the use of ICS (group 1, prospective) and 90 patients without ICS (group 2, historical control). According to the type of operation, the patients were subdivided into three consecutive 30-patient subgroups (1, aortoiliac occlusive disease [AOD]; 2, elective abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA]; or 3, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm [RAAA]). Transfusion requirements and postoperative complications were recorded. The total amounts of perioperatively transfused allogeneic blood were higher in all patient subgroups that underwent surgery without ICS ( p = .0032). In the ICS group, 50% of AOD patients and 60% of elective AAA patients received no allogeneic transfusions. There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications in any group examined. ICS significantly reduced the necessity for allogeneic transfusions during abdominal aortic surgery. ICS use was most valuable in urgent situations with high blood losses, such as RAAA, for which only small amounts of allogeneic blood were initially available. In patients with more than 3 units of autologous blood reinfused, this method was cost effective.

Perioperative anemia in the elderly

Anemia is characterized by less than the normal number of red blood cells (RBCs) (as a result of underproduction, increased loss, or destruction) or decreased quantity of hemoglobin (Hgb) in the blood, thereby reducing the blood's oxygen-carrying capacity.

Implementation of the Continuous AutoTransfusion System (C.A.T.S) in open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: an observational comparative cohort study

The use of the Continuous AutoTransfusion System (C.A.T.S; Fresenius Hemotechnology, Bad Homburg v.d.H., Germany), which conserves allogenic blood, is reported in 187 patients having abdominal aortic aneurysm repair during a 9-year period. Patients were allocated to C.A.T.S if a Haemovigilance technician was available. A mean of 685 mL of retrieved blood was reinfused in 101 patients receiving C.A.T.S; 61% required 2 U or less. All control patients required 3 U or more of allogenic blood. Allogenic transfusion in C.A.T.S patients decreased significantly (P < .0001). Mean intensive care unit stay was significantly reduced in C.A.T.S patients (P = .042). Mean postoperative hospital stay was 18 days for C.A.T.S group and 25 days in control patients (P = .014). The respective 30-day mortality was 12% versus 19% (P = .199). The C.A.T.S markedly reduced the amount of blood transfused, was associated with reduced intensive care unit and postoperative hospital stay, and was cost-effective.

Transfusion of blood products and nosocomial infection in surgical patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liberal transfusion of blood products may be associated with a worse clinical outcome, including in-hospital mortality. This review focuses on the mechanisms by which transfusions may result in an increased risk of bacterial infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

The association between blood transfusion and worse outcome has been attributed to suppression of the recipient's immune function, the so called transfusion-related immunomodulation effect, as well as changes that may occur as blood ages. Despite several attempts to identify the mechanism by which transfusion worsens outcomes, this mechanism, as well as the role of leukoreduction in the mitigation of transfusion-related immunomodulation, have yet to be demonstrated. Bacterial contamination of the blood supply has become a serious problem in the past 20 years, and is currently the second leading cause of transfusion-associated death. Since the implementation of specific platelet transfusion protocols, the incidence of morbidity and mortality caused by infected platelet units appears to be markedly reduced.

SUMMARY

Transfusion of blood and blood products can be life-saving interventions. Consequences of transfusion may ultimately result in worse outcomes. More research will be required in order to identify indications and practices that optimize outcomes of surgical patients who require a blood transfusion.

Alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusions

Inherent risks and increasing costs of allogeneic transfusions underline the socioeconomic relevance of safe and effective alternatives to banked blood. The safety limits of a restrictive transfusion policy are given by a patient's individual tolerance of acute normovolaemic anaemia. latrogenic attempts to increase tolerance of anaemia are helpful in avoiding premature blood transfusions while at the same time maintaining adequate tissue oxygenation. Autologous transfusion techniques include preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD), acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH), and intraoperative cell salvage (ICS). The efficacy of PAD and ANH can be augmented by supplemental iron and/or erythropoietin. PAD is only cost-effective when based on a meticulous donation/transfusion plan calculated for the individual patient, and still carries the risk of mistransfusion (clerical error). In contrast, ANH has almost no risks and is more cost-effective. A significant reduction in allogeneic blood transfusions can also be achieved by ICS. Currently, some controversy regarding contraindications of ICS needs to be resolved. Artificial oxygen carriers based on perfluorocarbon (PFC) or haemoglobin (haemoglobin-based oxygen carriers, HBOCs) are attractive alternatives to allogeneic red blood cells. Nevertheless, to date no artificial oxygen carrier is available for routine clinical use, and further studies are needed to show the safety and efficacy of these substances.

Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM): an update

Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT)-related immunomodulation (TRIM) encompasses the laboratory immune aberrations that occur after ABT and their established or purported clinical effects. TRIM is a real biologic phenomenon resulting in at least one established beneficial clinical effect in humans, but the existence of deleterious clinical TRIM effects has not yet been confirmed. Initially, TRIM encompassed effects attributable to ABT by immunomodulatory mechanisms (e.g., cancer recurrence, postoperative infection, or virus activation). More recently, TRIM has also included effects attributable to ABT by pro-inflammatory mechanisms (e.g., multiple-organ failure or mortality). TRIM effects may be mediated by: (1) allogeneic mononuclear cells; (2) white-blood-cell (WBC)-derived soluble mediators; and/or (3) soluble HLA peptides circulating in allogeneic plasma. This review categorizes the available randomized controlled trials based on the inference(s) that they permit about possible mediator(s) of TRIM, and examines the strength of the evidence available for relying on WBC reduction or autologous transfusion to prevent TRIM effects.

Transfusion requirements and outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery using intra-operative cell salvage

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) is the recovery, anticoagulation, filtration and reinfusion of blood lost during surgery. The aim of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of ICS in emergency and elective abdominal aortic surgery.

METHODS

This study reviews volumes of blood loss, blood salvaged with ICS, allogenic blood requirements, and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery using ICS.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery are included. Supplemental allogenic blood was not required in 45/79 (57%) of all patients. Transfusion with allogenic blood was not necessary in 41/63 (66%) of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. ICS was associated with no major complications.

CONCLUSION

ICS is a safe procedure and substantially reduces the need for blood transfusion in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. It may substantially alleviate shortages of allogenic blood and should be part of the armamentarium of vascular units.

Red blood cell transfusions in patients undergoing lower extremity artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The purpose of this study was to search predictors of red blood cell transfusions in peripheral vascular surgical patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All the patients who undergone infrainguinal bypass surgery at Helsinki University Hospital in the year 2000 were included. Of 266 records 261 (98%) were available for data review. Multiple stepwise regression model was created to identify independent predictors of blood use.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

174 (67%) of the patients received red blood cell transfusion. The lowest measured mean (SD) haemoglobin was 94 (11) g/l intraoperatively and 92 (+/- 10) g/l on the first two postoperative days. The median (range) number of units was 3 (1-19). Multivariate analysis showed that high age (p = 0.019), small body surface area (p = 0.017), low preoperative haemoglobin (p < 0.001), blood loss (p < 0.001), long lasting surgery (p<0.001), reoperation (p=0.018), femoro-distal reconstruction (p=0.048) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.023) increased the risk to receive red blood cell transfusion. The frequent use of antithrombotic medication (72% of the patients) did not significantly increase red blood cell administration. The generous use of red blood cells despite relative safe haemoglobin levels indicates a need for a standardized multidisciplinary transfusion strategy in this patient population. Otherwise, most of the predictors for red blood cell administration were nonmodifiable.

Acute normovolemic hemodilution in moderate blood loss surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusion are increasingly recognized. More blood is cross-matched for moderate blood loss surgery than any other indication. The role of acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) as a blood transfusion strategy was evaluated in a prospective randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 155 patients undergoing elective hip surgery were randomly assigned to either "ANH" (n = 78) or "standard transfusion" (n = 77). ANH on induction of anesthesia was to a target hemoglobin (Hb) level of 110 g per L with return of autologous blood on wound closure. Allogeneic blood was prescribed by an objective transfusion trigger based on an Hb level of less than 80 g per L. Transfusion requirements and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Allogeneic transfusion was necessary in 22 (29%) standard transfusion patients and 15 (19%) ANH (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.28-1.3; p = 0.23) with 63 and 33 units transfused, respectively (p = 0.1). Significant postoperative complications occurred in 30 (38%) standard transfusion patients compared with 14 (18%) of those randomly assigned to ANH (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.14-0.65; p = 0.009). The major difference between the groups was the frequency of infective complications.

CONCLUSION

Despite modest allogeneic transfusion requirements in hip surgery, ANH reduced postoperative complications.

Pneumonia as a complication of blood product transfusion in the critically ill: Transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM)

BACKGROUND

An increased risk of postoperative infection (including pneumonia) attributable to the receipt of allogeneic blood transfusion has been investigated as a possible manifestation of transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM) in 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and approximately 40 observational studies.

OBJECTIVES

This review categorizes RCTs and observational studies with regard to the inference that they permit about possible mediators of TRIM-allogeneic white cells (WBCs), WBC-derived soluble mediators, and/or allogeneic plasma-and examines whether the totality of the clinical evidence supports an association between allogeneic blood transfusion and postoperative infection.

RESULTS

When all available studies are considered together in meta-analyses, three types of studies show no increased risk of postoperative infection in association with allogeneic blood transfusion: a) RCTs comparing recipients of buffy-coat-reduced and prestorage-filtered, WBC-reduced allogeneic red cells; b) RCTs comparing recipients of allogeneic and autologous blood; and c) observational studies comparing patients transfused before and after implementation of WBC reduction. RCTs comparing recipients of nonbuffy-coat-reduced and WBC-reduced red blood cells may point to a TRIM effect, but they cannot yet be subjected to formal meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

No overwhelming clinical evidence has been presented to establish the existence of a TRIM effect that relates allogeneic blood transfusion to postoperative infection.

Autologous blood transfusion in elective cardiac valve operations

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF STUDY

The aim of this study was to detect any outcome differences between patients who donated autologous blood versus nondonors undergoing nonemergent cardiac valve surgery. Of further interest was whether autologous donors required less allogeneic blood products overall than patients who did not donate.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study in which data were collected prospectively on 225 variables. Cases underwent nonemergent, cardiac valve surgery and donated autologous blood products (n = 40). Controls also had nonemergent, cardiac valve surgery but did not donate autologous blood products (n = 120). Cases were matched to controls 1:3 on age (+/-3 years), gender, and New York Heart Association Functional Classification. We controlled for 12 potential confounding variables and examined 17 outcomes of interest. To generate the unadjusted risks of each outcome, chi-square and t-tests were performed comparing cases and controls to each outcome of interest. Then logistic regression analysis investigated the adjusted risk between cases and controls and for the outcomes of interest, each controlling for the potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the cases and controls for 11 of the 12 possible confounding variables. Controls had significantly more chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. There were no significant differences between cases and controls for 13 of the 17 outcomes of interest. Autologous blood donors received more total packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (p = 0.0373) and more total fresh frozen plasma than controls (p = 0.0002). Fewer autologous blood donors required allogeneic packed red blood cell transfusion (p = 0.0134), and the total length of stay was shorter for autologous donors (p = 0.0782).

CONCLUSION

Four of the 17 outcomes of interest were different for patients who donated autologous blood versus those who did not. Our experience demonstrated that elective cardiac valve surgery can safely reduce (by 18.3%) the need for allogeneic PRBCs by utilizing preoperative autologous blood donation.

A prospective study investigating the cost effectiveness of intraoperative blood salvage during liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Adult orthotopic liver transplantation is associated with significant use of allogenic blood products, which places considerable demands on finite resources. This could be reduced by autologous red cell salvage use, and we evaluated its cost effectiveness in this prospective study.

METHODS

Intraoperative autotransfusion was used in 660 adult liver transplant patients between January 1997 and July 2002. These included 134 with acute liver failure, 62 retransplants, 90 alcohol-related, 183 viral, 98 cholestatic chronic liver diseases, and 93 with other etiologies.

RESULTS

The total volume of red blood cells transfused was 3641+/-315 ml, 2805+/-234 ml, 2603+/-443 ml, and 2785+/-337 ml for alcohol-related, viral, cholestatic, and others, respectively. Low preoperative hemoglobin was significantly associated with higher intraoperative transfusion requirements. Blood volumes transfused at retransplantation were significantly higher (7077+/-1110 ml vs. 2864+/-138 ml; P<0.001) than for acute liver failure and chronic liver disease. Autologous blood volumes transfused were similar in all diagnostic groups, but were significantly greater in retransplantation (2754+/-541 ml vs. 1524+/-77 ml; P<0.01). Venovenous bypass was significantly associated with higher transfusion requirements. Total savings per case were similar for all diagnostic groups but were greater in cases of retransplantation (864+/-222 pounds (1235+/-317 US dollars) vs. 238+/-24 pounds (340+/-34 US dollars; P<0.001). With the use of autologous transfusion over the study period, a cost saving of 131,901 pounds (188,618 US dollars) was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative red blood cell salvage and autologous transfusion is cost effective in adult liver transplantation. Currently, where optimum resource utilization and fiscal constraint are paramount in healthcare delivery, autologous transfusion is an important adjunct in liver transplantation.

Coagulation Disorders and Blood Product Use in Patients Undergoing Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) is associated with major blood loss, often exceeding the patient's intravascular volume, and complex intraoperative and postoperative coagulopathies necessitating large-volume transfusion of blood products. Abnormalities sufficient to cause thrombocytopenia or clinically important prolongation of clotting parameters are rarely present before surgery in elective aneurysms but are more common with ruptured aneurysms. The finding of intraoperative and postoperative deficiencies of clotting factors, along with thrombin generation and activation of the thrombolytic system, is reflective of massive blood losses, visceral ischemia, and massive transfusions. An aggressive strategy of transfusion of blood products is critical to the prevention of clinically significant coagulopathy during surgery. Adjuncts to reduce blood losses and blood product use include low-dose aprotinin or epsilon -aminocaproic acid, intraoperative blood salvaging, and acute normovolemic hemodilution. In TAAA repair, an average blood loss of 5000 to 6000 mL and average transfusion of allogeneic blood products of 50 to 60 U are to be anticipated.

Autologous Blood Transfusion in TRAM Breast Reconstruction:

Many centers continue to use preoperative donation of autologous blood as part of their reconstructive protocol for pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) breast reconstruction, despite the lack of support for this in the English language literature. This prospective study compares 3 groups of patients undergoing reconstruction with TRAM flaps using 3 different protocols in 3 different centers. Group 1 did not donate blood preoperatively. Group 2 donated 1 to 2 U preoperatively and received their blood intraoperatively or during the early postoperative period. Group 3 did not receive their autologous blood unless they displayed symptoms of hypovolemia or anemia postoperatively. There were no statistical differences between groups in age, length of stay, or number of unilateral versus bilateral procedures. Patients who did not donate autologous blood (group 1) had statistically significantly higher preoperative and postoperative day 3 hemoglobin levels than patients in the groups that did predonate. The authors conclude that preoperative autologous donation of blood does not confer any clinical advantage to patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction using pedicled TRAM flaps.

Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative autotransfusion in surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

Perioperative homologous blood transfusion (HBT) is associated with adverse reactions and risks transmission of infection. It has also been implicated as an immunosuppressive agent. Intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT) is a potential method of autologous transfusion.

Methods

This was a single-centre randomized clinical trial of IAT in surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Forty patients were randomized to IAT and 41 underwent surgery with HBT only. Patients in both groups received HBT to maintain haemoglobin levels above 8 g/dl. Transfusion requirements, and incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and infection, were compared.

Results

Significantly fewer patients in the IAT group required HBT (21 versus 31; P = 0·038) and the median blood requirement per patient was 2 units lower (P = 0·012). There was a higher incidence of chest infection (12 versus four patients; P = 0·049) and SIRS (20 versus nine patients; P = 0·020) in the HBT group. Risk of SIRS was related to aortic cross-clamp time in the IAT group only.

Conclusion

Use of autotransfusion effectively reduced the need for HBT and was associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative SIRS and infective complications.

Prospective randomized controlled trial of acute normovolaemic haemodilution in major gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) remains uncertain because of a lack of well-designed prospective randomized controlled trials. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ANH on allogeneic transfusion, postoperative complications, and duration of stay.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery were randomized to a planned 3-unit ANH, or no ANH. Both groups underwent identical management including adherence to a transfusion protocol after surgery. Outcome measures included the number of patients receiving allogeneic blood, complications, and duration of stay.

RESULTS

380 patients were screened of which 160 were included in the study, median age was 62 yr (range 23-90), 'ANH' n=78, 'no ANH' n=82. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of patients receiving allogeneic blood 22/78 (28%) vs 25/82 (30%), the total number of allogeneic units transfused (90 vs 93), complication rate, or duration of stay. Haemodilution significantly increased anaesthetic time, median 55 (range 15-90) vs 40 min (range 17-80) (P<0.001). Significantly fewer patients in the ANH group experienced oliguria in the immediate postoperative period 37/78 (47%) vs 55/82 (67%) (P=0.012). The most significant factors affecting transfusion were blood loss, starting haemoglobin, and age. When compared with ASA-matched historical controls, the introduction of a transfusion protocol reduced the transfusion rate in colorectal patients from 136/333 (41%) to 37/138 (27%), P=0.004.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large pragmatic study, ANH did not affect allogeneic transfusion rate in major gastrointestinal surgery. Preoperative haemoglobin, blood loss, and transfusion protocol are the key factors influencing allogeneic transfusion.

Infectious and immunologic consequences of blood transfusion

Blood transfusions remain common practice in the critical care and surgical settings. Transfusions carry significant risks, including risks for transmission of infectious agents and immune suppression. Transmission of bacterial infections, although rare, is the most common adverse event with transfusion. The risk for transmission of viral infections has decreased over time, clearly because tests are becoming more sensitive in detecting certain viral infections such as hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV. Several immunomodulatory effects are thought to be related to transfusions, and these can result in cancer recurrence, mortality, and postoperative infections. Numerous studies have been performed to examine the role of leukoreduction in decreasing these transfusion-related complications but results remain contradictory. We review the infectious risks associated with blood transfusion and the most recent data on its immunologic effects, specifically on cancer recurrence, mortality, and postoperative infections in surgical patients. We also review the use of leukoreduction in blood transfusion and its role in preventing transfusion-transmitted infections and immunomodulatory complications.

Perioperative Blood Transfusion Is Predictive of Poststernotomy Surgical Site Infection: Marker for Morbidity or True Immunosuppressant?

To analyze risk factors for the development of adult poststernotomy surgical site infections (SSIs), we performed a retrospective case-control study at a tertiary care hospital. Case patients with poststernotomy SSI between June 1999 and January 2001 were matched to control subjects without poststernotomy SSI according to date of procedure and age. Data were collected on known SSI risk factors. Of 711 procedures, we identified 38 cases with SSI and 114 matched controls. Univariate analysis revealed that receipt of transfused blood (odds ratio [OR], 3.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-6.62), diabetes (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.27-6.59), length of stay before hospitalization (OR, 1.19 per day; 95% CI, 1.02-1.37 per day), and American Society of Anesthesia score (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.04-4.64) were significantly associated with SSI. Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.41-7.31) and diabetes (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.42-9.36) were predictors for SSI. The exact role of blood transfusion in the pathogenesis of SSI, whether as a direct immunosuppressant or a surrogate marker for morbidity, remains unresolved.

Strategies to reduce perioperative blood loss related to non-surgical bleeding

The treatment of critically ill patients has advanced markedly over the last decade. However, non-surgical bleeding of a diffuse nature from numerous tiny capillaries still remains a challenge. Once initiated, this type of bleeding may be troublesome and a vicious circle develops since it is not a single vessel contributing to this blood loss. The description 'non-surgical blood loss' is often given to this. This review describes a step-by-step approach for the treatment of non-surgical bleeding and includes various measures, such as desmopressin, blood components, antifibrinolytics, antithrombin III, prothrombin complex concentrates and factor XIII. While most non-surgical bleedings can be managed using the approach described here, a number of patients still continue to bleed. In these cases, the surgeon should re-evaluate the bleeding in terms of its surgical origin. If this can positively be excluded and if all of measures described fail to reduce or stop the bleeding, further treatment of such uncontrolled bleeding remains symptomatic.

Reducing Allogenic Blood Transfusions during Pediatric Cranial Vault Surgical Procedures:

Almost all patients who undergo major craniosynostosis corrections receive allogenic blood transfusions. This study of intraoperative blood salvage was undertaken in an attempt to further reduce the need for blood transfusions and to enhance the safety of these complex procedures. This prospective nonrandomized series included 60 consecutive children undergoing major cranial vault remodeling, primarily for treatment of craniosynostosis (single-suture and syndromic). A single craniofacial surgeon performed all operations, using a cell-saver equipped with a 55-cc pediatric bowl. The average age of the patients in this series was 4 years (33 of 60 patients were less than 18 months of age), and the average length of the surgical procedure was 196 minutes. Fifty-three percent were primary procedures and 47 percent were secondary. The mean estimated blood loss was 356 cc (19 cc/kg, or 28.5 percent of the estimated total blood volume). An average of 110 cc of cell-saver blood (range, 5 to 900 cc), or 7.8 percent of the patient's estimated total blood volume (approximately 15 percent, accounting for hemoconcentration of the cell-saver blood), was recycled for transfusion. No statistically significant factors (primary versus secondary procedure, diagnosis, age, or weight) were identified as predictive indicators for the use of this technology. Although 59 of 60 patients received transfusions, only 18 (30 percent) received allogenic blood (average, approximately 140 cc). There were no complications associated with the use of the cell-saver device. Use of the cell-saver during major craniosynostosis repair seemed to be safe and was associated with an extremely low allogenic blood transfusion rate.

The role of hospital transfusion committees in blood product conservation

Transfusion committees have been created in different countries to oversee all aspects of blood product transfusion within individual institutions. A fundamental role of hospital transfusion committees is to ensure appropriate blood product use by developing local policies, educating clinicians, and auditing blood use. Unfortunately, this task is hampered by the lack of universally accepted criteria for blood product transfusion. Several examples of specific interventions directed toward improving blood use have been described in the literature. Despite some limitations of these reports, largely because of shortfalls in study design, such interventions appear to be generally effective, but there is not enough evidence to recommend a specific course of action to ensure appropriate blood use. Notwithstanding such problems, a functional hospital transfusion committee can have a major impact on local rates of inappropriate transfusion.