Drug-induced liver disease

The application of cytokeratin-18 as a biomarker for drug-induced liver injury

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a frequent and dangerous adverse effect faced during preclinical and clinical drug therapy. DILI is a leading cause of candidate drug attrition, withdrawal and in clinic, is the primary cause of acute liver failure. Traditional diagnostic markers for DILI include alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Yet, these routinely used diagnostic markers have several noteworthy limitations, restricting their sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in diagnosing DILI. Consequently, new biomarkers for DILI need to be identified.A potential biomarker for DILI is cytokeratin-18 (CK18), an intermediate filament protein highly abundant in hepatocytes and cholangiocytes. Extensively researched in a variety of clinical settings, both full length and cleaved forms of CK18 can diagnose early-stage DILI and provide insight into the mechanism of hepatocellular injury compared to traditionally used diagnostic markers. However, relatively little research has been conducted on CK18 in preclinical models of DILI. In particular, CK18 and its relationship with DILI is yet to be characterised in an in vivo rat model. Such characterization of CK18 and ccCK18 responses may enable their use as translational biomarkers for hepatotoxicity and facilitate management of clinical DILI risk in drug development. The aim of this review is to discuss the application of CK18 as a biomarker for DILI. Specifically, this review will highlight the properties of CK18, summarise clinical research that utilised CK18 to diagnose DILI and examine the current challenges preventing the characterisation of CK18 in an in vivo rat model of DILI.

G protein β5-ATM complexes drive acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity

Excessive ingestion of the common analgesic acetaminophen (APAP) leads to severe hepatotoxicity. Here we identify G protein β5 (Gβ₅), elevated in livers from APAP overdose patients, as a critical regulator of cell death pathways and autophagic signaling in APAP-exposed liver. Liver-specific knockdown of Gβ₅ in mice protected the liver from APAP-dependent fibrosis, cell loss, oxidative stress, and inflammation following either acute or chronic APAP administration. Conversely, overexpression of Gβ₅ in liver was sufficient to drive hepatocyte dysfunction and loss. In hepatocytes, Gβ₅ depletion ameliorated mitochondrial dysfunction, allowed for maintenance of ATP generation and mitigated APAP-induced cell death. Further, Gβ₅ knockdown also reversed impacts of APAP on kinase cascades (e.g. ATM/AMPK) signaling to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a master regulator of autophagy and, as a result, interrupted autophagic flux. Though canonically relegated to nuclear DNA repair pathways, ATM also functions in the cytoplasm to control cell death and autophagy. Indeed, we now show that Gβ₅ forms a direct, stable complex with the FAT domain of ATM, important for autophosphorylation-dependent kinase activation. These data provide a viable explanation for these novel, G protein-independent actions of Gβ₅ in liver. Thus, Gβ₅ sits at a critical nexus in multiple pathological sequelae driving APAP-dependent liver damage.

Iron loading exerts synergistic action via a different mechanistic pathway from that of acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury in mice

Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a major cause of drug-induced acute liver failure. In such cases, free iron is released from lysosomes and is transported to mitochondria where it plays a pivotal role in APAP-induced liver injury. We previously reported that ascorbic acid (Asc) markedly mitigates APAP-induced hepatic damage in aldehyde reductase (Akr1a)-knockout (KO) mice that produce about 10% Asc as wild-type (WT) mice. However, the issue of the protective mechanism of Asc in association with the status of iron remains ambiguous. To gain additional insights into this issue, we examined effects of APAP (500 mg/kg) on female KO mice under conditions of iron loading. While the KO mice without AsA supplementation were more sensitive to APAP toxicity than the WT mice, FeSO₄ loading (25 mg/kg) to WT mice aggravated the hepatic injury, which was a similar extent to that of the KO mice. Supplementation of Asc (1.5 mg/ml in the drinking water) ameliorated KO mice irrespective of iron status but did not change the iron-mediated increase in the lethality in the WT mice. Hepatic cysteine and glutathione levels declined to similar extents in all mouse groups at 3 h irrespective of the iron status and largely recovered at 18 h after the APAP treatment when liver damage was evident. Asc prominently mitigated APAP toxicity in KO mice irrespective of the iron status but had no effect on the synergistic action of iron and APAP in the WT mice, suggesting that the mechanism for the deteriorating action of loaded iron is different from that of APAP toxicity.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Biomarkers, Requirements, Candidates, and Validation

The hepatotoxicity of drugs is the main cause of drug withdrawal from the pharmaceutical market and interruption of the development of new molecules. Biomarkers are useful in several situations. In case of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI), biomarkers can be used to confirm liver damage, its severity, prognosis, confirm drug causality, or define the type of DILI. In this review, we will first present the currently used biomarkers and candidate biomarkers for the future. The current biomarkers are certainly very helpful including with the assistance of diagnostic method such the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method, but provide a limited information for the early detection of liver injury, the role of specific drug and the prediction of DILI. Some biomarkers are promising but they are not yet available for routine use. Studies are still needed to confirm their interest, particularly in comparison to Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method.

The mitochondrial negative regulator MCJ is a therapeutic target for acetaminophen-induced liver injury

Acetaminophen (APAP) is the active component of many medications used to treat pain and fever worldwide. Its overuse provokes liver injury and it is the second most common cause of liver failure. Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to APAP-induced liver injury but the mechanism by which APAP causes hepatocyte toxicity is not completely understood. Therefore, we lack efficient therapeutic strategies to treat this pathology. Here we show that APAP interferes with the formation of mitochondrial respiratory supercomplexes via the mitochondrial negative regulator MCJ, and leads to decreased production of ATP and increased generation of ROS. In vivo treatment with an inhibitor of MCJ expression protects liver from acetaminophen-induced liver injury at a time when N-acetylcysteine, the standard therapy, has no efficacy. We also show elevated levels of MCJ in the liver of patients with acetaminophen overdose. We suggest that MCJ may represent a therapeutic target to prevent and rescue liver injury caused by acetaminophen.

Drug-induced liver injury: Do we know everything?

Interest in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has dramatically increased over the past decade, and it has become a hot topic for clinicians, academics, pharmaceutical companies and regulatory bodies. By investigating the current state of the art, the latest scientific findings, controversies, and guidelines, this review will attempt to answer the question: Do we know everything? Since the first descriptions of hepatotoxicity over 70 years ago, more than 1000 drugs have been identified to date, however, much of our knowledge of diagnostic and pathophysiologic principles remains unchanged. Clinically ranging from asymptomatic transaminitis and acute or chronic hepatitis, to acute liver failure, DILI remains a leading causes of emergent liver transplant. The consumption of unregulated herbal and dietary supplements has introduced new challenges in epidemiological assessment and clinician management. As such, numerous registries have been created, including the United States Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network, to further our understanding of all aspects of DILI. The launch of LiverTox and other online hepatotoxicity resources has increased our awareness of DILI. In 2013, the first guidelines for the diagnosis and management of DILI, were offered by the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology, and along with the identification of risk factors and predictors of injury, novel mechanisms of injury, refined causality assessment tools, and targeted treatment options have come to define the current state of the art, however, gaps in our knowledge still undoubtedly remain.

The pathogenesis of drug-induced liver injury

Drugs can induce liver injury when taken as an over-dose, or even at therapeutic doses in susceptible individuals. Although severe drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a relatively uncommon clinical event, it is a potentially life threatening adverse drug reaction and is the most common indication for the drug withdrawal. Areas covered: However, the diagnosis of DILI remains a significant challenge, because the establishment of causality is very difficult, and the histopathologic findings of DILI may be indistinguishable from those of other hepatic disorders, such as viral and alcoholic hepatitis. In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances in identification of serologic markers of diagnosis and prognosis, etiologic factors for susceptibility and diagnostic evaluation of DILI, with a focus on its pathogenic mechanisms and the role of liver biopsy. Expert commentary: Further studies of divergent research platforms, using a systems biology approach such as genomics and transcriptomics, may provide a deeper understanding of human drug metabolism and the causes, risk factors, and pathogenesis of DILI.

Drug Induced Liver Injury: Review with a Focus on Genetic Factors, Tissue Diagnosis, and Treatment Options

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but potentially life threatening adverse drug reaction. DILI may mimic any morphologic characteristic of acute or chronic liver disease, and the histopathologic features of DILI may be indistinguishable from those of other causes of liver injury, such as acute viral hepatitis. In this review article, we provide an update on causative agents, clinical features, pathogenesis, diagnosis modalities, and outcomes of DILI. In addition, we review results of recently reported genetic studies and updates on pharmacological and invasive treatments.

Safety overview of FDA-approved medications for the treatment of the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Parkinson's disease (PD) is among the most common of the neurodegenerative disorders. Treatment is primarily focused on correcting neurotransmitter imbalances. Several classes of medication are available for this purpose.

AREAS COVERED

A Medline search was performed to gather information about the safety of the medications approved for the treatment of the motor symptoms of PD. This was supplemented with additional articles obtained from online sources and information provided by the FDA and the manufacturers. The focus of this review is the side-effect and safety profiles of carbidopa/levodopa, dopamine agonists, selective monoamine oxidase inhibitors, catechol-o-methyltransferase inhibitors, anticholinergics and amantadine.

EXPERT OPINION

Though serious side-effects may occur, as a group, the medications used for the treatment of PD motor symptoms tend to produce side-effects that are mild to moderate in nature, and that primarily reflect the focus on dopaminergic therapies. Care plans for Parkinson's patients should be approached based on the needs of the individual as disease presentation, lifestyle, level of disability, concurrent disease states and the presence of non-motor symptoms make each case unique. Patients and caregivers must have realistic expectations about the use of PD medications.

Immunohistochemical expression of caspase-3, caspase-5, caspase-7 and apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (APAF-1) in the liver and kidney of rats exposed to zoledronic acid (ZOL) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates (BPs) like zoledronic acid (ZOL) are widely used for the treatment of different diseases such as osteoporosis, metastatic bone diseases and hypercalcaemia. However, the effects of BPs on apoptosis of the liver and kidney after treatment are unclear. Furthermore, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is an angiogenic molecule, which plays an important role in angiogenesis and tissue repair. The present study investigated the expression of caspase-3, -5, -7 and apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (APAF-1) in the liver and kidney of rats treated with ZOL and bFGF.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated the expression of caspase-3, -5, -7 and apoptotic protease-activating factor-1 (APAF-1) in the liver and kidney of rats treated with ZOL and bFGF.

ANIMALS AND METHODS

An animal model with 32 male Sprague Dawley rats was used. The effects of ZOL and bFGF on liver and kidney with the expressions of different apoptosis markers were studied histopathologically and immunohistochemically. Data were analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, Kruskal-Wallis and Bonnferroni-Dunn tests.

RESULTS

The main microscopic findings were mononuclear cell infiltrations around the bile ducts, binuclear and markedly enlarged hepatocytes (cytomegaly) and mitotic figures in the liver of rats treated with ZOL only. Immunohistochemically, both APAF-1 and caspase-3, -5 and -7 expressions were found elevated significantly (P < 0.05) in the liver and kidney of these rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that ZOL treatment increased while bFGF treatment decreased apoptosis significantly in the liver and kidney of Sprague Dawley rats.

CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

The addition of bFGF to ZOL treatment of various diseases might reduce the ZOL effects.

Risk factors for development of cholestatic drug-induced liver injury: inhibition of hepatic basolateral bile acid transporters multidrug resistance-associated proteins 3 and 4

Impaired hepatic bile acid export may contribute to development of cholestatic drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRP) 3 and 4 are postulated to be compensatory hepatic basolateral bile acid efflux transporters when biliary excretion by the bile salt export pump (BSEP) is impaired. BSEP inhibition is a risk factor for cholestatic DILI. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between MRP3, MRP4, and BSEP inhibition and cholestatic potential of drugs. The inhibitory effect of 88 drugs (100 μM) on MRP3- and MRP4-mediated substrate transport was measured in membrane vesicles. Drugs selected for investigation included 50 BSEP non-inhibitors (24 non-cholestatic; 26 cholestatic) and 38 BSEP inhibitors (16 non-cholestatic; 22 cholestatic). MRP4 inhibition was associated with an increased risk of cholestatic potential among BSEP non-inhibitors. In this group, for each 1% increase in MRP4 inhibition, the odds of the drug being cholestatic increased by 3.1%. Using an inhibition cutoff of 21%, which predicted a 50% chance of cholestasis, 62% of cholestatic drugs inhibited MRP4 (P < 0.05); in contrast, only 17% of non-cholestatic drugs were MRP4 inhibitors. Among BSEP inhibitors, MRP4 inhibition did not provide additional predictive value of cholestatic potential; almost all BSEP inhibitors were also MRP4 inhibitors. Inclusion of pharmacokinetic predictor variables (e.g., maximal unbound concentration in plasma) in addition to percent MRP4 inhibition in logistic regression models did not improve cholestasis prediction. Association of cholestasis with percent MRP3 inhibition was not statistically significant, regardless of BSEP-inhibition status. Inhibition of MRP4, in addition to BSEP, may be a risk factor for the development of cholestatic DILI.

Toxicology and safety of COMT inhibitors

The development of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors for the adjunct treatment to levodopa and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) inhibitors in Parkinson's disease started in the late 1950s. The first-generation inhibitors were associated with toxic properties: they induced convulsions, or they were toxic to the liver. None of them was taken into clinical use. The second-generation inhibitors entacapone and tolcapone have now been in clinical use for over a decade, and some new inhibitors are under development. The main adverse events in the use of entacapone and tolcapone are dopaminergic and dependent of the concomitant use of levodopa, but the symptoms are generally moderate or mild. Among the non-dopaminergic adverse events, diarrhea is the most prominent one induced by both entacapone and tolcapone. In clinical use, entacapone has been safe, but tolcapone is under strict regulations on liver enzyme monitoring, since in the early years, a few hepatotoxicity cases appeared, three of them with fatal outcome. The mechanism behind tolcapone-induced liver toxicity has been evaluated both in vitro and in vivo, but no clear answer exists at the moment. In the regulatory animal studies, both inhibitors have been safe with no reported toxicity. Also nebicapone, the latest of the second-generation inhibitors in clinical trials has shown some liver enzyme elevations in human subjects. New inhibitors with a structure differing from nitrocatechols are under development. No safety concerns have been reported connected to COMT inhibiton as such. COMT knockout mice are fertile without any pathologies due to the total COMT inhibition.

Development of a High-Throughput Human HepG2 Dual Luciferase Assay for Detection of Metabolically Activated Hepatotoxicants and Genotoxicants

Hepatic toxicity remains a major concern for drug failure; therefore, a thorough examination of chemically induced liver toxicity is essential for a robust safety evaluation. Current hypotheses suggest that the metabolic activation of a drug to a reactive intermediate is an important process. In this article, we describe a new high-throughput GADD45β reporter assay developed for assessing potential liver toxicity. Most importantly, this assay utilizes a human cell line and incorporates metabolic activation and thus provides significant advantage over other comparable assays used to determine hepatotoxicity. Our assay has low compound requirement and relies upon 2 reporter genes cotransfected into the HepG2 cells. The gene encoding Renilla luciferase is fused to the CMV promoter and provides a control for cell numbers. The firefly luciferase gene is fused to the GADD45β promoter and used to report an increase in DNA damage. A dual luciferase assay is performed by measuring the firefly and Renilla luciferase activities in the same sample. Results are expressed as the ratio of the 2 luciferase activities; increases over the control are interpreted as evidence of stress responses. This mammalian dual luciferase reporter has been characterized with, and without, metabolic activation using positive and negative control agents. Our data demonstrate that this assay provides for an assessment of potential toxic metabolites, is adaptable to a high-throughput platform, and yields data that accurately and reproducibly detect hepatotoxicants.

Cancer chemotherapy II: atypical hepatic injuries

Although chemotherapy generally is accompanied by regular testing for liver enzyme abnormalities, atypical reactions may occur that escape ordinary detection, because hepatocyte injury is not the primary event. The presence of fatty liver, mitochondrial changes, and even biliary abnormalities can be associated with normal or nearly normal liver enzyme levels. This article discusses unique aspects of liver damage associated with cancer chemotherapy. These unique reactions merit special attention and a special vigilance from clinicians.

Hepatotoxicity induced by alendronate therapy

Here we describe a 47-year-old postmenopausal woman who had been taking alendronate 70 mg/week for osteoporosis. After two months of alendronate therapy, she developed hepatotoxicity, and no other etiological factors for this besides the alendronate were apparent. After the alendronate therapy was discontinued, the patient's hepatic enzyme levels slowly returned to normal. Hepatotoxicity due to alendronate therapy is a rare but possible adverse effect.

Hepatotoxicity of anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs: ultrastructural aspects

With the increasing incidence of drug-induced liver disease, attempts are being made to better understand the mechanisms behind these frequently life-endangering reactions. Analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs are a major group exhibiting hepatotoxicity. We review research relating to these reactions, focusing on ultrastructural findings, which may contribute to the comprehension and possible avoidance of drug-induced liver disease. We also present some original observations on clinical material and cultured cells exposed to acetaminophen alone or in combination with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine or the P-glycoprotein inhibitor verapamil.

Drug-induced liver disease

This year's review has been divided into five sections: The first describes the natural history of drug-induced liver disease, the second discusses the issue of placebo-related increases in liver-associated enzymes, the third describes agents newly reported to cause hepatic injury, the fourth discusses new reports of hepatic injury from established drugs, and the final section reviews the burgeoning field of hepatoprotection with clinical and experimental examples of agents used in the prevention and treatment of drug-induced liver disease, with acetaminophen as the major example.