Early visual processing during binocular rivalry studied with visual evoked potentials

Probing the mechanisms of probe-mediated binocular rivalry

Binocular rivalry occurs when incompatible images are presented simultaneously but separately to each eye. Perceptual dominance reverses over time such that one image temporarily dominates perception, while the other image is suppressed. Prior research has shown that briefly-presented probes modulate perception such that probes presented to the suppressed eye tend to produce shorter percept durations relative to when probes are presented to the dominant eye. This pattern suggests that probes strengthen the competitive strength of the image over which they appear. However, it remains unclear whether probe-modulated effects on binocular rivalry are equivalent across the visual field, in particular as a function of whether probes appear within the region of interocular conflict (i.e on-object) or outside the region of interocular conflict (i.e. off-object). We tested this by manipulating whether probes appeared on-object or off-object. We replicate prior work showing that suppressed-eye probes produce shorter percept durations relative to dominant-eye probes. Critically, however, we show that percept duration also varies as a function of whether probes appear on vs. off the rivalry objects; that is, differences in percept duration between suppressed-eye and dominant-eye probes were much larger for on-object than off-object probes. Importantly, however, the difference between suppressed-eye and dominant-eye probes was still significant for off-object probes. Together these results suggest dynamic mechanisms at work in probe-mediated rivalry, such that on-object probe effects are larger relative to smaller, yet reliable off-object effects.

Regulating the Access to Awareness: Brain Activity Related to Probe-related and Spontaneous Reversals in Binocular Rivalry

Research on the neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) has implicated an assortment of brain regions, ERP components, and network properties associated with visual awareness. Recently, the P3b ERP component has emerged as a leading NCC candidate. However, typical P3b paradigms depend on the detection of some stimulus change, making it difficult to separate brain processes elicited by the stimulus itself from those associated with updates or changes in visual awareness. Here we used binocular rivalry to ask whether the P3b is associated with changes in awareness even in the absence of changes in the object of awareness. We recorded ERPs during a probe-mediated binocular rivalry paradigm in which brief probes were presented over the image in either the suppressed or dominant eye to determine whether the elicited P3b activity is probe or reversal related. We found that the timing of P3b (but not its amplitude) was closely related to the timing of the report of a perceptual change rather than to the onset of the probe. This is consistent with the proposal that P3b indexes updates in conscious awareness, rather than being related to stimulus processing per se. Conversely, the probe-related P1 amplitude (but not its latency) was associated with reversal latency, suggesting that the degree to which the probe is processed increases the likelihood of a fast perceptual reversal. Finally, the response-locked P3b amplitude (but not its latency) was associated with the duration of an intermediate stage between reversals in which parts of both percepts coexist (piecemeal period). Together, the data suggest that the P3b reflects an update in consciousness and that the intensity of that process (as indexed by P3b amplitude) predicts how immediate that update is.

Event-related potential correlates of sound organization: early sensory and late cognitive effects

We tested whether incoming sounds are processed differently depending on how the preceding sound sequence has been interpreted by the brain. Sequences of a regularly repeating three-tone pattern, the perceived organization of which spontaneously switched back and forth between two alternative interpretations, were delivered to listeners. Occasionally, a regular tone was exchanged for a slightly or moderately lower one (deviants). The electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded while listeners continuously marked their perception of the sound sequence. We found that for both the regular and the deviant tones, the early exogenous P1 and N1 amplitudes varied together with the perceived sound organization. Percept-dependent effects on the late endogenous N2 and P3a amplitudes were only found for deviant tones. These results suggest that the perceived sound organization affects sound processing both by modulating what information is extracted from incoming sounds as well as by influencing how deviant sound events are evaluated for further processing.

On the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence

During binocular rivalry visual consciousness fluctuates between two dissimilar monocular images. We investigated the role of attention in this phenomenon by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) when binocular-rivalry stimuli were attended with when they were unattended. Stimuli were dichoptic, orthogonal gratings that yielded binocular rivalry and dioptic, identically oriented gratings that yielded binocular fusion. Events were all possible orthogonal changes in orientation of one or both gratings. We had two attention conditions: In the attend-to-grating condition, participants had to report changes in perceived orientation, focussing their attention on the gratings. In the attend-to-fixation condition participants had to report changes in a central fixation target, taking attention away from the gratings. We found, surprisingly, that attending to rival gratings yielded a smaller ERP component (the N1, from 160–210 ms) than attending to the fixation target. To explain this paradoxical effect of attention, we propose that rivalry occurs in the attend-to-fixation condition (we found an ERP signature of rivalry in the form of a sustained negativity from 210–300 ms) but that the mechanism processing the stimulus changes is more adapted in the attend-to-grating condition than in the attend-to-fixation condition. This is consistent with the theory that adaptation gives rise to changes of visual consciousness during binocular rivalry.

Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location

Responses to stimuli are faster when the stimulus location spatially corresponds to the required response (standard Simon effect). Recently, a similar effect has been observed with monocular stimuli. Responses were faster when the response location and the stimulated eye corresponded (monocular Simon effect). It has been suggested that distinct mechanisms may underlie these two Simon effects. Here, we attempted to study these two mechanisms simultaneously. For mean reaction time, a finding of perfect additivity was obtained. These behavioral data coupled with surface electrophysiological measures support the view that two different mechanisms contribute independently to the monocular and standard Simon effect.

Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing

Directing attention to one of two superimposing surfaces composed of dot fields rotating in opposing directions facilitates processing of brief translations of the attended surface [Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., & Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials. Journal of Cognition and Neuroscience, 10(1), 137-151]. Here we used ERP recordings to investigate the mechanisms of endogenous attentional selection of such competing dot surfaces under conditions of dichoptic viewing (one surface to each eye) and monocular viewing (both surfaces to one eye). Under dichoptic conditions, which induced binocular rivalry, translations of the attended surface presented to one eye elicited enhanced visual P1 and N1 ERP components relative to translations of the unattended surface presented to the other eye. In comparison, during monocular viewing the attended surface translations elicited a significantly larger N1 component in the absence of any P1 modulation. These results indicate that processing of the attended surface is biased at an earlier level in extrastriate visual cortex under conditions of inter-ocular versus intra-ocular competition.

Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study

When their two eyes are presented with radically different images, observers report a fluctuation in perception between those images. This phenomenon, i.e. that only one image dominates the percept at a time, is termed binocular rivalry. Consequently, when rivalrous stimulation is changed into non-rivalrous stimulation, it depends on the image that has been currently dominant whether a change in perception occurs (incompatible change) or not (compatible change). That is, the perceptual experience differs although the physical input is the same, namely the stimulus of one eye has been changed. In the event-related brain potential (ERP) to compatible and incompatible changes we found differences as early as in the P1-N1-range, suggesting that in humans the binocular rivalry phenomenon is already (partly) resolved in extrastriate visual areas latest. Moreover, similar results were obtained with steady and flickering stimulus presentation showing that the processes involved in dealing with competing visual input do not depend critically on stimulus presentation mode.

Both monocular and binocular signals contribute to motion rivalry

There is an ongoing debate on whether binocular rivalry involves competition among monocular cells or binocular cells. We investigated this issue psychophysically with two specially designed test stimuli. One test stimulus contained monocular motion signals but greatly reduced binocular motion signals, while the other contained binocular motion signals but no monocular motion signals. For comparison, we also employed a normal rivalrous control containing both monocular and binocular motion signals, and a non-rivalrous flicker-noise control with neither monocular nor binocular motion signals. We found that binocular rivalry for the two test stimuli was significantly reduced compared with the normal rivalrous control, but not completely eliminated compared with the non-rivalrous control. Therefore, both monocular and binocular motion signals appear to contribute to motion rivalry, suggesting that motion rivalry must involve competition among both monocular and binocular cells.

MEG alpha activity decrease reflects destabilization of multistable percepts

Multistable stimuli offer the possibility to investigate visual awareness, since they evoke spontaneous alternations between different perceptual interpretations of the same stimulus and, therefore, allow to dissociate perceptual from stimulus-driven mechanisms. In the present study, we used an ambiguous motion paradigm and compared endogenous reversals of perceived motion direction which occur spontaneously during constant ambiguous stimulation with exogenous reversals that were induced externally by changes of stimulation. Contrasting the two conditions allowed to investigate processes that trigger endogenous reversals, since the related activity should be absent in the exogenous reversal condition. We employed ambiguous dot patterns which can easily be transformed to present two stable motion directions in order to induce exogenous pattern reversals. Whole-head MEG was recorded from 10 subjects. We analyzed event-related fields (ERFs) and oscillatory activity in the alpha and gamma ranges. The results showed P300-like slow waves in response to both endogenous and exogenous reversals reflecting the conscious recognition of pattern reversals. Analyses in the gamma-band did not reveal any significant modulations. The alpha activity showed different time courses for endogenous and exogenous reversals. While the exogenous alpha activity decreased in temporal relation to the pattern reversal, the endogenous alpha activity displayed a continuous decrease starting in the time interval preceding the reversal. This time course of the endogenous alpha activity is consistent with a bottom-up approach to figure reversals, since it reflects a process of destabilization of the actual percept until a switch of visual awareness occurs.

Electrical activity in primary visual area due to interocular suppression

Under binocular rivalry conditions, evoked potentials to lower hemifield stimulation are more positive for the dominant than for the suppressed eye between 100 and 300 ms. However, this pattern reverses when the upper hemifield is stimulated, suggesting a neural source in V1 for this endogenous potential (rivalry-related potential, RRP). Here we investigated the functional significance of the RRP using an interocular suppression procedure. We replicated the RRP polarity reversal for upper versus lower hemifield stimulation and showed that the RRP reflects differences in processing during dominance and suppression and not shifts in dominance.

Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry

During binocular rivalry, two incompatible monocular images compete for perceptual dominance, with one pattern temporarily suppressed from conscious awareness. We measured fMRI signals in early visual cortex while subjects viewed rival dichoptic images of two different contrasts; the contrast difference served as a 'tag' for the neuronal representations of the two monocular images. Activity in primary visual cortex (V1) increased when subjects perceived the higher contrast pattern and decreased when subjects perceived the lower contrast pattern. These fluctuations in V1 activity during rivalry were about 55% as large as those evoked by alternately presenting the two monocular images without rivalry. The rivalry-related fluctuations in V1 activity were roughly equal to those observed in other visual areas (V2, V3, V3a and V4v). These results challenge the view that the neuronal mechanisms responsible for binocular rivalry occur primarily in later visual areas.

Psychophysiological studies of unattended information processing

The article describes the general methods and some of the results obtained in the Psychophysiology Laboratory of the University of La Coruña. The paper covers our research on the Simon effect and accessory effect, although it is not a review of the literature. The research strategy we followed is built around the use of lateralized motor potentials recorded from scalp. These measures allow observing the way responses are selected and when they are selected, providing an invaluable tool to study response interference and to split reaction time into two halves. The research on the Simon effect concludes that interference during response selection is critical in the Simon effect but it is dubious whether this process should be considered as automatic and stimulus-driven, as is widely accepted. The experiments with the accessory effect indicate that facilitation is produced before response selection is over, which ends a long controversy about the locus of the accessory effect.