Creating a learning environment to produce competent residents: the roles of culture and context

Peer mentorship and professional identity formation: an ecological systems perspective

BACKGROUND

Mentoring can help shape how medical students think, feel, and act as physicians. Yet, the mechanism in which it influences this process of professional identity formation (PIF) remains poorly understood. Through the lens of the ecological systems theory, this study explores the interconnected and dynamic system of mentoring relationships and resources that support professional development and growth within the Palliative Medicine Initiative (PMI), a structured research peer mentoring program.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of transcripts of semi-structured interviews with peer mentors and mentees and a review of their mentoring diaries was conducted to explore the impact of participation in a longitudinal peer mentoring program on both mentees and peer mentors on their personal and professional development through the lens of the mentoring ecosystem model. The Systematic Evidence-Based Approach was adapted to analyze the data via content and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen mentees and peer mentors participated and described a supportive community of practice within the research program, with discrete micro-, meso-, and macro-environments that are dynamic, reflexive, and interconnected to form a mentoring ecosystem. Within this ecosystem, reflection is fostered, and identity work is done-ultimately shaping and refining self-concepts of personhood and identity.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the nuances and complexities of mentorship and supports the role of the mentoring ecosystem in PIF. A deeper understanding of the multiple factors that converge to facilitate the professional development of mentees can help educators develop and implement structured peer mentorship programs that better support reflective practice and identity work.

Prenatal Care Utilization Challenges and Facilitators for a Growing Latino Community in the Midwest

BACKGROUND

Latina women are less likely to start prenatal care in the first trimester and to attend the recommended amount of prenatal visits compared to their non-Latina white counterparts.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess challenges and facilitators to first-trimester prenatal care (FTPNC) and prenatal care utilization (PNCU) in a Midwestern urban area with a growing immigrant Latino community.

METHODS

This study used a mixed-method approach based on the Theoretical Domains Framework. Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals that worked in birth centers, clinics, or hospitals that provided prenatal care (PNC) services for Latina women. Eight focus groups and quantitative surveys were conducted with Latina women and their supporters in Kansas City metropolitan area.

RESULTS

FTPNC was challenged by women's immigrant status, lack of healthcare coverage due to immigrant status, and complexity of Medicaid application. PNCU was challenged by the cost of PNC when diagnosed with gestational diabetes, lack of healthcare coverage, PNC literacy, late access to gynecologists/obstetricians, inadequate interpretation services, transportation, and mental health distress. Meanwhile, FTPNC was facilitated by social support and connectedness. PNCU was facilitated by Spanish-proficient providers and interpreters, effective nonverbal communication and education techniques, and pregnancy prevention access and education.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Results from this study highlight important targets to improve PNC for Latina women. Participants called for various types of support to address identified challenges, ranging from information on social media about PNC services to broader efforts such as building trust from the community toward PNC providers and making PNC services affordable for women with gestational diabetes.

Barriers and Facilitators to Pediatric Resident Education in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study

Objective Local resident evaluations of the pediatric emergency department (ED) declined over the last five years. Sparse literature exists on resident perspectives of educational experiences. This study explored the barriers and facilitators to resident education in the Pediatric ED. Methods This qualitative study utilized focus groups at a large pediatric training hospital. Trained facilitators performed semi-structured interviews prompting discussion of resident experiences in the pediatric ED. One pilot and six focus groups (38 pediatric residents) achieved data saturation. Sessions were audio recorded, de-identified and transcribed by a professional service. Three authors (CJ, JM, SS) analyzed the transcripts independently using line-by-line coding. Following code agreement, authors identified central themes drawing on grounded theory. Results Six categories emerged: (1) ED environment, (2) consistent goals, expectations, and resources, (3) ED workflow, (4) preceptor accessibility, (5) resident growth and development, (6) ED preconceived notions. Residents value a respectful work environment despite the chaotic nature of the ED. They need clear goals and expectations with a strong orientation. Autonomy, open communication and shared decision-making allow residents to feel like team members. Residents gravitate toward welcoming, available preceptors that enthusiastically teach. More ED environment exposure increases comfort and efficiency and helps develop medical decision-making skills. Residents admit ED preconceptions and personality traits affect performance. Conclusion Residents self-identified barriers and facilitators to ED education. Educators must provide a safe and open learning environment, clear rotation expectations and goals, consistent positivity supporting shared decision making, and allow residents autonomy to build their practice styles.

Lived Experiences of Mistreatment in a General Surgery Residency

OBJECTIVE

Explore the lived experiences of General Surgery residents to identify how they perceive, define mistreatment, and which factors can contribute to or mitigate mistreatment within the Clinical Learning Environment.

DESIGN

This is a phenomenological study conducted during 2019-2020 using Giorgi's psychological descriptive phenomenology methodology. Researcher bias, trustworthiness, and triangulation were addressed using bracketing, check-ins with program leadership, comparisons to resident survey, and team consensus based on Consensual Qualitative Research.

SETTING

General Surgery Residency program at Long School of Medicine, UT Health San Antonio, Texas.

PARTICIPANTS

All residents in the general surgery program were invited to participate (n= 66, 43% female and 63% non-Hispanic). Specific demographic and identifying data for each participant was not collected. Approximately 50 (76% of program) residents from General Surgery participated.

RESULTS

We were able to identify four themes that helped to delineate the lived experience of residents including program cultural factors, resident internal processing, and perceived effects of mistreatment by the residents. The resulting psychological structure and conceptual framework help clarify the interrelations between the themes and the Clinical Learning Environment. The scenarios discussed were adapted and depersonalized to use as prompts for the Forum Theater intervention. This project set out to explore resident's lived experiences and allow the data to reveal the main outcomes. The data was coded and analyzed following strict guidelines from descriptive psychological phenomenology and Consensual Qualitative Research with the aim of informing a later experiential intervention based on Forum Theater.

CONCLUSIONS

The lived experience of general surgery residents helped identify cultural factors and behaviors that contribute to and/or mitigate mistreatment providing information to plan interventions at the resident and faculty level. Mitigating or stopping mistreatment can improve the Clinical Learning Environment and hence, the quality of training.

Resources for clinical learning environment orientation

INTRODUCTION

Each clinical learning environment (CLE) requires learners to navigate a different set of complex interactions to engage in safe patient care while learning from real patients. Orientation forms the foundation for learning, yet CLE models in the literature are primarily written for an educator audience and practical advice for orienting learners to a new CLE is limited. To address this gap, we designed resources to support both supervisors and learners in the orientation process.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We reviewed the CLE literature to select critical content for orientation and interviewed high performing residents to identify their best practices. We synthesized the literature and resident interviews into a visually appealing and easy to digest infographic designed to simultaneously remind teachers of the critical areas to cover in orientation and empower learners to ask about them. We integrated these principles into an online module for Graduate Medical Education onboarding and surveyed users about how well they could meet the module learning objectives.

RESULTS

We organized the literature review and resident advice regarding questions learners should ask about a new CLE into the typical question categories (why, who, what, when, where, and how) and described strategies for orientation to each category. Our infographic has been incorporated into CLE orientation for multiple types of learners at our institution. After completing the orientation module, 112/124(90%) residents indicated that they could, 'Orient yourself or a learner to a clinical learning environment using orientation questions' moderately to extremely well.

DISCUSSION

We developed resources that can be used by educators to create orientation materials and by learners to ensure they understand important features, resources, and expectations in a new CLE. Because the foundational principles of CLE apply to a variety of clinical settings and learner types, the resources may be broadly applicable.

"We're all going through it": impact of an online group coaching program for medical trainees: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Trainees in graduate medical education are affected by burnout at disproportionate rates. Trainees experience tremendous growth in clinical skills and reasoning, however little time is dedicated to metacognition to process their experiences or deliberate identity formation to create individualized definitions of success and wellbeing. The purpose of this study was to understand the perspectives and experiences of trainees who participated in a 6-month, web-based, group coaching program for women residents in training.

METHODS

Better Together Physician Coaching is a six-month, self-paced, online, asynchronous, coaching program with multiple components including live coaching calls, unlimited written coaching, and self-study modules. Semi-structured interviews of seventeen participants of Better Together from twelve GME programs within a single institution in Colorado were conducted from May to June of 2021. All identified as women and had participated in a 6-month coaching program. Both inductive and deductive methods were used in collecting and analyzing the data with an aim to understand learners' perceptions of the coaching program, including "how and why" the coaching program affected training experiences and wellbeing.

RESULTS

Three main themes emerged as benefits to the coaching program from the data: 1) practicing metacognition as a tool for healthy coping 2) building a sense of community, and 3) the value of a customizable experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Female trainees who participated in a group coaching program expressed that they found value in learning how to cope with stressors through metacognition-focused coaching. They also described that building a community and being able to customize the experience were positive aspects of the program.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05280964 . Date of registration: March 15th 2022. Retrospectively registered. URL of trial registry record.

Improving the Obstetrics and Gynecology Learning Environment Through Faculty Development

INTRODUCTION

The learning environment is shaped by both formal and hidden curricula. Faculty play a critical role in the learning environment but may not be prepared to address the hidden curriculum. This workshop teaches faculty how to manage the hidden curriculum's challenges.

METHODS

Medical students' end-of-clerkship evaluations revealed low ratings in the domains of feedback, respectful interactions, professional language use, and empathy. We created a virtual 60-minute case-based faculty development workshop to highlight the role of faculty in improving the learning environment. A preworkshop survey was emailed to participants. At the workshop, following a brief introduction, participants were divided into groups to discuss the cases and develop strategies to improve the learning environment. A postworkshop survey was used to assess the workshop.

RESULTS

Sixty faculty members attended the seminar. Fifty-seven percent completed a preworkshop survey, and 33% completed the postworkshop survey. After the workshop, more faculty felt well prepared to engage students and residents. The majority of participants (85%) reported being more aware of issues around the learning environment. Most (85%) felt that their interactions with medical students would change in a positive way after the workshop. Ninety percent agreed the workshop was relevant to their needs, 70% agreed they learned a new skill in the workshop, and 80% committed to creating an inclusive learning environment after the workshop.

DISCUSSION

This workshop was well received by participants and was associated with an improvement in learning environment ratings. Faculty development seminars are an efficient tool to improve the learning environment.

Flying Solo: Effectiveness of Attendingless Family-Centered Rounds on Improving Resident Autonomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires that residents demonstrate increasing autonomy during their training. Although residents report a better educational environment with hospitalists present during family-centered rounds (FCRs), there is a concern that attending presence may reduce resident autonomy. We aim to determine the effect of FCRs without an attending during rounds on senior residents' sense of autonomy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, preintervention-postintervention study at 5 children's hospitals to evaluate the effect of rounding without an attending on senior residents' self-efficacy, using a questionnaire developed by using Bandura's principles of self-efficacy and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones. Questions addressed skills of diagnosis and/or management, communication, teaching, and team management. We compared preintervention and postintervention results using paired t tests and Wilcoxon rank tests. One-way analysis of variance tests were used to compare means among >2 groups.

RESULTS

116 (82% response rate) of 142 eligible senior residents completed the questionnaire, which yielded a high reliability (α = 0.80) with a 1-factor score. The average composite score of self-efficacy significantly improved after intervention compared with the preintervention score (66.71 ± 6.95 vs 60.91 ± 6.82; P < .001). Additional analyses revealed meaningful improvement of each individual item postintervention. The highest gain was reported in directing bedside teaching (71.8% vs 42.5%; P < .001) and answering learner questions on rounds (70.7% vs 47.0%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting FCRs without an attending increases resident reported self-efficacy regarding core elements of patient care and team leadership. In future studies, researchers should examine the impact of rounding without the attending on other stakeholders, such as students, interns, patients and/or families.

Evaluation of the urology residency training program in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the satisfaction of urology residents with the Saudi Board of Urology (SBU) Training Program and identifies areas of weakness and strength to improve the educational environment, surgical competency, and overall satisfaction of urology residents with the program.

METHODS

We administered an electronic self-made questionnaire that included two sections. One comprised demographic data (age, gender, weight, height, marital status, level of training, city of training, and center of training), while the other concerned SBU evaluation (satisfaction with different aspects of training, such as ways of assessment, mentors' feedback, surgical competency, research, and strengths and weaknesses of SBU).

RESULTS

The overall satisfaction of urology residency program was 28.8% while 44.2% of residents had a neutral response. The highest level of satisfaction with clinical and surgical practice was among graduates (56.9%) and Riyadh residents (45.1%). Furthermore, good work/life balance received the lowest level of satisfaction (5.2%) among senior residents, while good clinical experience received the highest level (62.7%) among the graduates. Residents reported a high exposure in endourology and pediatric urology, while transplant, reconstructive, and neurourology had the lowest exposure. Forty-two percent of respondents undertook research during their residency training, but most respondents (54%) did not publish any research papers during their training. Sixty-two percent of graduates felt that their training program did not prepare them adequately to perform well on the board examinations.

CONCLUSION

Our results confirmed that satisfaction of residents with the urology program process is variable according to the city of training. Having high satisfaction level in some cities reflects the improvement of urology training program after restructuring. We identified new areas in need of improvement, namely lack of mentorship, clear and formal assessment process, and variation of training process between central and peripheral programs.

Mediation effects of clinical practice stress between clinical education environment and satisfaction with clinical practice

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify the possible correlations of 'satisfaction with clinical practice (SA)' with 'clinical learning environment (EN)' and 'clinical practice stress (ST).' We searched for the mediating effect of 'clinical practice stress' on 'satisfaction with clinical practice' when the clinical learning environment influences 'satisfaction with clinical practice.'

METHODS

This research investigated 208 medical and nursing students attending the school of medicine and nursing in Korea. The total number of nursing students was 135 (64.9%); 73 medical students participated (35.1%). We used the Korean-Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment in 24 questions for EN, ST scale in 24 questions, and SA scale in 10 questions. We performed measurement structural equation model analysis to identify a path of the model.

RESULTS

Medical students had significantly higher levels of ST. EN had a significant negative correlation with ST and a significant positive correlation with SA. The ST had a significant negative correlation with SA. The results of the goodness of fit index have fulfilled the criteria of goodness of fit. There was a significant mediating effect of ST on SA when EN influences SA.

CONCLUSION

The clinical learning environment affected satisfaction with the clinical practice directly or indirectly mediated by clinical practice stress. Therefore, educational institutes should try to increase satisfaction with clinical practice by continuously monitoring and improving the clinical learning environment in addition to taking measures for decreasing the clinical practice stress.

Comparison of the Perspectives of Medical Students and Residents on the Surgery Learning Environment

BACKGROUND

The learning environment plays a critical role in learners' satisfaction and outcomes. However, we often lack insight into learners' perceptions and assessments of these environments. It can be difficult to discern learners' expectations, making their input critical. When medical students and surgery residents are asked to evaluate their teachers, what do they focus on?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Open-ended comments from medical students' evaluations of residents and attending surgeons and from residents' evaluations of attendings during the 2016-2017 academic year were analyzed. Content analysis was used, and codes derived from the data. A matrix of theme by learner role was created to distinguish differences between medical student and resident learners. Subthemes were grouped based on similarity into high-order themes.

RESULTS

Two overarching themes were Creating a positive environment for learning by modeling professional behaviors and Intentionally engaging learners in training and educational opportunities. Medical students and residents made similar comments for the subthemes of appropriate demeanor, tone and dialog, respect, effective direct instruction, feedback, debriefing, giving appropriate levels of autonomy, and their expectations as team members on a service. Differences existed in the subthemes of punctuality, using evidence, clinical knowledge, efficiency, direct interactions with patients, learning outcomes, and career decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty development efforts should target professional communication, execution of teaching skills, and relationships among surgeons, other providers, and patients. Attendings should make efforts to discuss their approach to clinical decision making and patient interactions and help residents and medical students voice their opinions and questions through trusting adult learner-teacher relationships.

Are we generating more assessments without added value? Surgical trainees' perceptions of and receptiveness to cross-specialty assessment

INTRODUCTION

Competency-based medical education (CBME) hinges on robust assessment. However, integrating regular workplace-based assessment within demanding and sometimes chaotic clinical environments remains challenging. Many faculty lack assessment expertise, and some programs lack the infrastructure and faculty numbers to fulfill CBME's mandate. Recognizing this, we designed and implemented an assessment innovation that trains and deploys a cadre of faculty to assess in specialties outside their own. Specifically, we explored trainees' perceptions of and receptiveness to this novel assessment approach.

METHODS

Within Western University's Surgical Foundations program, 27 PGY‑1 trainees were formatively assessed by trained non-surgeons on a basic laparoscopic surgical skill. These assessments did not impact trainees' progression. Four focus groups were conducted to gauge residents' sentiments about the experience of cross-specialty assessment. Data were then analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

While a few trainees found the experience motivating, more often trainees questioned the feedback they received and the practicality of this assessment approach to advance their procedural skill acquisition. What trainees wanted were strategies for improvement, not merely an assessment of performance.

DISCUSSION

Trainees' trepidation at the idea of using outside assessors to meet increased assessment demands appeared grounded in their expectations for assessment. What trainees appeared to desire was a coach-someone who could break their performance into its critical individual components-as opposed to an assessor whose role was limited to scoring their performance. Understanding trainees' receptivity to new assessment approaches is crucial; otherwise training programs run the risk of generating more assessments without added value.

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Instruction in Adult Rheumatology Fellowship Programs

OBJECTIVE

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in rheumatology in the US has advanced by way of promotion of certifications and standards of use and inclusion of core fellowship curriculum. In order to inform endeavors for curricular integration, the objectives of the present study were to assess current program needs for curricular incorporation and the teaching methods that are being employed.

METHODS

A needs-assessment survey (S1) was sent to 113 rheumatology fellowship program directors. For programs that taught MSUS, a curriculum survey (S2) was sent to lead faculty. Programs were stratified according to program size and use of a formal written curriculum.

RESULTS

S1 (108 of 113 respondents; response rate 96%) revealed that 94% of programs taught MSUS, with 41% having a curriculum. Curricular implementation was unaffected by program size. Formal curricular adoption of MSUS was favored by 103 directors (95.3%), with 65.7% preferring such adoption to be optional. S2 (74 of 101 respondents; response rate 73%) showed that 41% of programs utilized a formal curriculum. Multiple teaching strategies were used, with content that was generally similar. Use of external courses, including the Ultrasound School of North American Rheumatologists course, was prevalent. Fewer barriers were noted compared to past surveys, but inadequate time, funding, and number of trained faculty still remained. Lack of divisional interest (P = 0.046) and interest of fellows (P = 0.012) were noted among programs without a formal curriculum.

CONCLUSION

MSUS is taught by a significantly larger number of rheumatology fellowship programs today. Multiple teaching strategies are used with common content, and barriers still remain for some programs. Most program directors favor inclusion of a standardized MSUS curriculum, with many favoring inclusion to be optional.

Linking hospital culture to the training performance of residents: The roles of leader-member exchange and transactional leadership style

BACKGROUND

Hospital culture is a crucial aspect of residents' training. However, the mechanisms related to stakeholder culture (SC) and teacher-resident interaction remain unclear. The study investigated the relationship between hospital culture and training performance of residents. Also, it explored the mediating effect of teacher-resident exchange and the moderating effect of the teacher's transactional leadership style within a Chinese context.

METHODS

Based on stakeholder and leadership member exchange theories, we constructed a composite model. Data were collected from 296 residents from five tertiary hospitals in China. Hierarchical moderated regression analyses were used to test the hypotheses.

RESULTS

(a) Both the employee-orientation culture (EOC) (β = .14, P ≤ .05) and patient-orientation culture (POC) (β = .47, P ≤ .001) in the hospital were significantly related to residents' training performance. (b) Teacher-resident exchange fully mediated the relationship between EOC and training performance and partially mediated the relationship between POC and training performance. (c) The moderating role of transactional leadership style (TLS) in the relationship between EOC and leader-member exchange (LMX) (β = -.17, P ≤ .05) was negative; it was not significant in the interaction between POC and TLS (β = .06, P > .1).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that trainers should consider the value of multiple cultures and ensure balance among stakeholders rather than focusing on a single one. Furthermore, a positive interaction improves teacher-student relationship and training performance. Most importantly, educational departments should pay attention to establishing assessment tools, using rewards and incentives in residents' training.

Team up! Linking teamwork effectiveness of clinical teaching teams to residents' experienced learning climate

Background: Supportive learning climates are key to ensure high-quality residency training. Clinical teachers, collaborating as teaching team, have an important role in maintaining such climates since they are responsible for residency training. Successful residency training is dependent on effective teamwork within teaching teams. Still, it remains unclear whether this team effort benefits residents' perceptions of the learning climate. We, therefore, investigated to what extent teamwork effectiveness within teaching teams is associated with (1) the overall learning climate, and (2) its affective, cognitive and instrumental facets?Methods: This study used a web-based platform to collect data in clinical departments in the Netherlands from January 2014 to May 2017. Teamwork effectiveness was measured with the TeamQ questionnaire, administered amongst clinical teachers. The learning climate was measured with the D-RECT, applied amongst residents. Associations were analyzed using multilevel models and multivariate general linear models.Results: Teamwork effectiveness was positively associated with the overall learning climate as well as with the affective and the instrumental facets of the learning climate. No significant associations were found with the cognitive facet.Conclusion: Effective teamwork within teaching teams benefits learning climates in postgraduate medical education. Therefore, departments aiming to improve their learning climate should target teamwork within teaching teams.

The Struggle Is Real: How Residents Learn to Provide High-Value, Cost-Conscious Care

Phenomenon: Rising healthcare expenditures threaten the accessibility and affordability of healthcare systems. Research has demonstrated that teaching (junior) physicians to deliver high-value, cost-conscious care can be effective when learning is situated in a supportive environment. This study aims to offer insight into how residents learn to provide high-value, cost-conscious care in the workplace and how the postgraduate training environment influences this learning. Approach: Six homogeneous focus groups were held between August 2015 and July 2016 with 36 residents from six residency programs (dermatology, n = 5; elderly care, n = 8; family medicine, n = 5; internal medicine, n = 6; orthopedic surgery, n = 6; surgery, n = 6). An iterative grounded theory approach was used to analyze the qualitative data. Findings: Influential factors in learning of high-value, cost-conscious care delivery operated on three levels: individual resident, training program, and the workplace. On the individual level, we discerned three types of beliefs regarding HV3C. At the training program level, perceived determinants of learning included resident-supervisor interactions, involvement in decision-making over time, and exposure to variation in care delivery. At the workplace level, learning depended on the availability of professional healthcare expertise and the presence of institutional policy. Insights: Residents struggle to seize high-value, cost-conscious care learning opportunities in the workplace setting. Both residency training programs and workplaces can contribute to creating these learning opportunities. An important starting point is being aware of the different personal beliefs of residents and the approaches to high-value, cost-conscious care on the level of the training program and workplace.

Establishing a Mutually Respectful Environment in the Workplace: A Toolbox for Performance Excellence

Most health care professionals spend a substantial amount of their time at the workplace. Our interactions with team members can define our daily experiences, impact our work performance, and influence our overall job satisfaction. Over the last years, how we interact with colleagues and patients has changed with the introduction of social media, a tenser political climate, and an evolving health care system. In oncology, a team can be composed of medical students, clinicians, and support and administrative staff within a heavy emotional environment where some of our patients are facing the risk of early mortality and most are dealing with the unmeasurable burden of cancer. Many of these factors can increase the risk for professionalism lapses. We discuss common challenges faced in the practice of cancer care, including the generational gap between medical trainees and senior members, gender disparities, and microaggressions. Microaggressions represent verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities that communicate hostile, derogatory, and negative slights that insult a target person or group. Microaggressions should not be accepted as the norm in the workplace. It is essential to recognize these negative behaviors and manage them effectively to reduce or even prevent the long-term toxicities that these behaviors can bring to the workplace environment. Ultimately, we must acknowledge that these issues exist and remember that education and collaboration are the pillars of an inclusive workplace. We owe such efforts to our patients who deserve good care, to our partners in the care of patients so that they feel supported and included, and to ourselves.

Protecting youth from gang membership: Individual and school-level emotional competence

The current study examined the association between adolescent emotional competence, operationalized and measured at both the individual and the school levels, and gang membership. The study involved a sample of 12,040 students (51.4% females; mean = 16.9 years) participating in the biennial state department of education coordinated California Healthy Kids Survey, which assesses a range of adolescent health-related behaviors. Hierarchical linear modeling indicated that higher levels of individual emotional competence were associated with a lower likelihood of identifying as a gang member. Moreover, a stronger negative association between emotional competence and identifying as a gang member was found when emotional competence was operationalized at the school level. Implications include the role of schools in promoting emotional regulation, empathy, and behavioral regulation of their entire student body as part of an overall strategy to reduce individual student's attraction to gangs.

Residents' perspective on professionalism in the learning environment

All accrediting organizations for medical education in the US require teaching hospitals to ensure the learning environment fosters professionalism behaviors of trainees and faculty. This study analyzes the learning environment of professionalism from the perspective of residents. An on-line anonymous survey that explored the learning climate of professionalism was sent to all residents at the University of Virginia in 2013-14. Residents rated their personal commitment, their residency program's, and the institution's commitment to demonstrating professionalism behaviors, described professionalism education, reasons for not participating in curricular offerings, the quality of role modeling, and barriers to professionalism. Nearly half the residents completed the survey (47%, N = 365/771). Residents rated their personal commitment and commitment of their residency program significantly greater than the institution's commitment to demonstrating professionalism.(p < 0.001) They noted only 25% of faculty modeled these behaviors all the time; and more than half stated poor role modeling impacted their attitudes about the importance of professionalism. Other areas in need of improvement include communicating with patients with cultural differences, and inter-professional teamwork. Despite accreditation requirements for learning environments, residency curricula, and faculty development programs to promote professionalism, residents perceive their commitment to professionalism greater than the institution where they work.

Contextualizing Work-Based Assessments of Faculty and Residents: Is There a Relationship Between the Clinical Practice Environment and Assessments of Learners and Teachers?

PURPOSE

Competence is bound to context, yet seldom is environment explicitly considered in work-based assessments. This study explored faculty and residents' perspectives of the environment during internal medicine clinical teaching unit (CTU) rotations, the extent that each group accounts for environmental factors in assessments, and relationships between environmental factors and assessments.

METHOD

From July 2014 to June 2015, 212 residents and 54 faculty across 5 teaching hospitals at University of Toronto rated their CTU environment using a novel Practice Environment Rating Scale (PERS) matched by block and hospital. Faculty-PERS data were paired to In-Training Evaluation Reports (ITERs) of residents supervised during each block, and Resident-PERS data to Resident Assessment of Teaching Effectiveness (RATE) scores of the same faculty. Differences between perceptions and assessments were tested using repeated-measures MANOVAs, ANOVAs, and correlations.

RESULTS

One-hundred sixty-four residents completed the PERS; residents rated the CTU environment more positively than faculty (3.91/5 vs. 3.29, P < .001). Residents were less likely to report considering environmental factors when assessing faculty (2.70/5) compared with faculty assessing residents (3.40, P < .0001), d = 1.2. Whereas Faculty-PERS ratings did not correlate with ITER scores, Resident-PERS ratings had weak to moderate correlations with RATE scores (overall r = 0.27, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Residents' perceptions of the environment had small but significant correlations with assessments of faculty. Faculty's perceptions did not affect assessments of residents, potentially because they reported accounting for environmental factors. Understanding the interplay between environment and assessment is essential to developing valid competency judgments.

Psychological Safety and Support: Assessing Resident Perceptions of the Clinical Learning Environment

BACKGROUND

Assessments of the clinical learning environment could allow early interventions to improve graduate medical education. To date, measurement tools for this have not been identified.

OBJECTIVE

We established the concurrent validity of 2 instruments that assess cultural facets of the clinical learning environment by correlating them with external program evaluation data.

METHODS

In 2017 we surveyed residents across 19 training programs on their perceptions of organizational support by using the Short Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS), and psychological safety by using the Psychological Safety Scale (PSS). Data were aggregated to the program level and correlated with results from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Resident Survey.

RESULTS

Of 511 residents, 322 (63%) completed the survey, and 496 of 516 residents (96%) completed the ACGME Resident Survey. Perceived organizational support correlated positively with overall program evaluation score (r = 0.75, P < .001); faculty (r = 0.72, P < .001); evaluation (r = 0.73, P < .001); educational content (r = 0.52, P = .022); and resources domains (r = 0.55, P =  .014). Psychological safety had a positive correlation with overall program evaluation (r = 0.57, P = .011); faculty (r = 0.50, P = .028); and evaluation (r = 0.62, P < .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The SPOS and PSS correlated with key ACGME Resident Survey domains. Programs showing greater support of residents were likely to show more positive ratings on program evaluation metrics. Teaching institutions may benefit from actively monitoring and improving aspects of their learning environment through internal assessments.

Resident Vitality in 34 Programs at 14 Academic Health Systems: Insights for Educating Physicians and Surgeons for the Future

OBJECTIVE

To clarify our understanding of how the culture of residency training influences the well-being of residents, this study reports on the vitality of residents at 34 programs across the United States and identifies characteristics of the programs, institutions and residents that are associated with high resident vitality.

DESIGN

In 2014 to 2015, residents nationally were surveyed using the validated C - Change Resident Survey. The survey assessed residents' vitality and 12 other dimensions that characterize residents' perspectives of the culture of the residency training programs: Self-efficacy, Institutional/program support, Relationships/inclusion/trust, Values alignment, Ethical/moral distress, Respect, Leadership aspirations, Mentoring, Work-life integration, Gender equity, Racial/ethnic minority equity, and self-assessed Competencies. Multilevel models were used to assess vitality within and across programs, and examine predictors including resident, program, and institution characteristics.

PARTICIPANTS

Two thousand four hundred and fifty-two residents from 11 General Surgery, 12 Internal Medicine, and 11 Pediatrics programs at 14 U.S. academic health systems.

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred and eight residents responded (70% response rate). The mean Vitality score was 3.6 (range 1-5, where values of 4-5 represent high Vitality). There was wide variation among the 34 programs in the percent of residents who had high Vitality scores, ranging from 17% to 71%. However, the average Vitality scores within specialty (Surgery, Medicine, and Pediatrics) were not significantly different. The strongest predictors of Vitality were Work-life integration, Relationships/inclusion/trust, Institutional/program support, Res?>pect, Values alignment, and Ethical/moral distress, which together accounted for 50% of vitality variance. Individual demographics accounted for just 3% of variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitality is an essential component of resident well-being, and within each specialty there are programs that have excelled in promoting a culture of high vitality. Our findings suggest that we should test interventions to enhance resident vitality by focusing greater attention on providing institutional support, aligning individual and institutional values, integrating work and personal life, and facilitating relationships, inclusiveness and trust.

Medical students' views of clinical environments

BACKGROUND

Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments (CLEs) is immensely important in medical education. Objective indicators of the quality of the CLE can be used to measure learner perceptions and to inform educational improvements; however, many established tools were not designed for use in clinical settings and are not theoretically grounded. Our aim was to apply a new tool to the new context of a UK setting to explore the perceptions of senior medical students in a number of different CLEs. Monitoring the quality of clinical learning environments is immensely important in medical education METHODS: The four-factor Undergraduate Clinical Education Environment Measure (UCEEM) was translated into English, and used to gather final-year medical students' perceptions of four different specialties they had rotated through: Emergency Medicine (EM), General Surgery (GS), Medicine for the Elderly (ME), and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G). The UCEEM was distributed in paper form. Students were asked to complete it in relation to two of the four specialties.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

Year-5 medical students (n = 132) returned a completed UCEEM. For opportunities to learn in and through work experience EM was reported the most positively. ME was perceived to be the most prepared for student entry. Students reported being well received by staff and made to feel part of the team within GS, EM and ME, but less so in O&G.

DISCUSSION

UCEEM appears to be a useful tool for evaluating medical student perceptions of CLEs. Theoretically robust, UCEEM is straightforward to administer and to score. It has the potential to be used by time-pressured educators to collect baseline and comparative data for evaluation and improvement purposes.

Assessing the Culture of Residency Using the C - Change Resident Survey: Validity Evidence in 34 U.S. Residency Programs

BACKGROUND

A practical instrument is needed to reliably measure the clinical learning environment and professionalism for residents.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and present evidence of validity of an instrument to assess the culture of residency programs and the clinical learning environment.

DESIGN

During 2014-2015, we surveyed residents using the C - Change Resident Survey to assess residents' perceptions of the culture in their programs.

PARTICIPANTS

Residents in all years of training in 34 programs in internal medicine, pediatrics, and general surgery in 14 geographically diverse public and private academic health systems.

MAIN MEASURES

The C - Change Resident Survey assessed residents' perceptions of 13 dimensions of the culture: Vitality, Self-Efficacy, Institutional Support, Relationships/Inclusion, Values Alignment, Ethical/Moral Distress, Respect, Mentoring, Work-Life Integration, Gender Equity, Racial/Ethnic Minority Equity, and self-assessed Competencies. We measured the internal reliability of each of the 13 dimensions and evaluated response process, content validity, and construct-related evidence validity by assessing relationships predicted by our conceptual model and prior research. We also assessed whether the measurements were sensitive to differences in specialty and across institutions.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 1708 residents completed the survey [internal medicine: n = 956, pediatrics: n = 411, general surgery: n = 311 (51% women; 16% underrepresented in medicine minority)], with a response rate of 70% (range across programs, 51-87%). Internal consistency of each dimension was high (Cronbach α: 0.73-0.90). The instrument was able to detect significant differences in the learning environment across programs and sites. Evidence of validity was supported by a good response process and the demonstration of several relationships predicted by our conceptual model.

CONCLUSIONS

The C - Change Resident Survey assesses the clinical learning environment for residents, and we encourage further study of validity in different contexts. Results could be used to facilitate and monitor improvements in the clinical learning environment and resident well-being.

The Culture of Academic Medicine: Faculty Behaviors Impacting the Learning Environment

OBJECTIVE

The culture of academic medical institutions impacts trainee education, among many other faculty and patient outcomes. Disrespectful behavior by faculty is one of the most challenging and common problems that, left unattended, disrupts healthy work and learning environments. Conversely, a respectful environment facilitates learning, creates a sense of safety, and rewards professionalism. The authors developed surveys and an intervention in an effort to better understand and improve climate concerns among health sciences faculty at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), a research-intense, public, academic medical center.

METHODS

An online "climate survey" of all UC San Diego health sciences faculty was conducted in 2011-2012. A strategic campaign to address the behavioral issues identified in the initial survey was subsequently launched. In 2015, the climate was re-evaluated in order to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 478 faculty members (223 women, 235 men, 35 % of faculty) completed the baseline survey, reporting relatively low levels of observed sexual harassment (7 %). However, faculty reported concerning rates of other disruptive behaviors: derogatory comments (29 %), anger outbursts (25 %), and hostile communication (25 %). Women and mid-level faculty were more likely to report these behavioral concerns than men and junior or senior colleagues. Three years after an institutional strategy was initiated, 729 faculty members (50 % of the faculty) completed a follow-up survey. The 2015 survey results indicate significant improvement in numerous climate factors, including overall respectful behaviors, as well as behaviors related to gender.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to enhance a culture of respect in the learning environment, institutions can effectively engage academic leaders and faculty at all levels to address disruptive behavior and enhance positive climate factors.

Does Psychological Safety Impact the Clinical Learning Environment for Resident Physicians? Results From the VA's Learners' Perceptions Survey

BACKGROUND

Psychological safety (PS) is the perception that it is safe to take interpersonal risks in the work environment. In teaching hospitals, PS may influence the clinical learning environment for trainees.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed whether resident physicians believe they are psychologically safe, and if PS is associated with how they rate satisfaction with their clinical learning experience.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Learners' Perceptions Survey (LPS) of residents who rotated through a Department of Veterans Affairs health care facility for academic years 2011-2014. Predictors of PS and its association with resident satisfaction were adjusted to account for confounding and response rate biases using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

The 13 044 respondents who completed the LPS (30% response rate) were comparable to nonpediatric, non-obstetrics-gynecology residents enrolled in US residency programs. Among respondents, 11 599 (89%) agreed that ". . . members of the clinical team of which I was part are able to bring up problems and tough issues." Residents were more likely to report PS if they were male, were in a less complex clinical facility, in an other medicine or psychiatry specialty, or cared for patients who were aged, had multiple illnesses, or had social supports. Nonpsychiatric residents felt safer when treating patients with no concurrent mental health diagnoses. PS was strongly associated with how residents rated their satisfaction across 4 domains of their clinical learning experience (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

PS appears to be an important factor in resident satisfaction across 4 domains that evaluators of graduate medical education programs should consider when assessing clinical learning experiences.

The good doctor - strong and persevering

BACKGROUND

In today’s society, doctors are confronted with a number of opposing interests, from other colleagues, patients and employers. The development and regulation of the medical profession have been widely studied. However, less research has been devoted to the doctors’ own perception of what it means to be a good doctor.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We conducted eight focus-group interviews and three individual interviews among senior consultants and specialty registrars in the areas of surgery, psychiatry and internal medicine in two different hospitals. Total N = 48, of which 56  % were women. The interviews were analysed with the aid of systematic text condensation.

RESULTS

«Professional dedication» demonstrated through «a high degree of attendance in the workplace» and «a high work capacity» were key topics for good doctors. Having a «high work capacity» was defined as being willing to go to great lengths, work overtime and work effectively. The senior consultants perceived their job as doctors more as a «lifestyle», while the specialty registrars more frequently regarded their work as a «job».

INTERPRETATION

Norwegian hospital doctors wish to appear dedicated to their profession. They can demonstrate this by showing great willingness to work intensively and effectively with patients, while also going to great lengths to be available beyond normal working hours.

It depends on your perspective: Resident satisfaction with operative experience

INTRODUCTION

Resident satisfaction is a key performance metric for surgery programs; we studied factors influencing resident satisfaction in operative cases, and the concordance of faculty and resident perceptions on these factors.

METHODS

Resident and faculty were separately queried on satisfaction immediately following operative cases. Statistical significance of the associations between resident and faculty satisfaction and case-related factors were tested by Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Residents and faculty were very satisfied in 56/87 (64%) and 36/87 (41%) of cases respectively. Resident satisfaction was associated with their perceived role as surgeon (p < 0.04), performing >50% of the case (p < 0.01), autonomy (p < 0.03), and PGY year 4-5(p < 0.02). Faculty taking over the case was associated with both resident and faculty dissatisfaction. Faculty satisfaction was associated with resident preparation (p < 0.01), faculty perception of resident autonomy (p < 0.01), and faculty familiarity with resident's skills (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Resident and faculty satisfaction are associated with the resident's competent performance of the case, suggesting interventions to optimize resident preparation for a case or faculty's ability to facilitate resident autonomy will improve satisfaction with OR experience.

Professional identity formation in the transition from medical school to working life: a qualitative study of group-coaching courses for junior doctors

BACKGROUND

The transition from student to medical doctor is challenging and stressful to many junior doctors. To practice with confidence and professionalism the junior doctors have to develop a strong professional identity. Various suggestions on how to facilitate formation of professional identity have been offered including the possible positive effect of group-coaching courses. The purpose of this study was to explore how group-coaching might facilitate professional identity formation among junior doctors in the transition period.

METHODS

Group-coaching courses comprising three whole-day sessions and five 2 h sessions during a period of 4 months were offered to junior doctors in the first years after graduation. The purpose was to support the participants' professional development, ability to relate to patients, relatives and staff and career development. The coaches in this study had a background as health professionals combined with coaching educations. Data was obtained through observations, open-ended questionnaires and interviews. A generic thematic analysis was applied.

RESULTS

Forty-five doctors participated in six coaching groups. The three main themes emerging in the sessions were: Adoption to medical culture, career planning, and work/life-balance. The junior doctors found the coaching intervention highly useful in order to cope with these challenges. Furthermore, the group was a forum where the junior doctors could share thoughts and feelings with colleagues without being afraid that this would endanger their professional career. Many found new ways to respond to everyday challenges mainly through a new awareness of patterns of thinking and feeling.

CONCLUSIONS

The participants found that the group-coaching course supported their professional identity formation (thinking, feeling and acting as a doctor), adoption to medical culture, career planning and managing a healthy work/life-balance. Further studies in different contexts are recommended as well as studies using other methods to test the results of this qualitative study.

Validation of the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) in a sample of 731 Greek residents

Background

The Greek version of the Postgraduate Hospital Educational Environment Measure (PHEEM) was evaluated to determine its psychometric properties, i.e., validity, internal consistency, sensitivity and responsiveness to be used for measuring the learning environment in Greek hospitals.

Methods

The PHEEM was administered to Greek hospital residents. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was used to evaluate the fit of Structural Equation Models. Content validity was addressed by the original study. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory (to test the set of underlying dimensions suggested by the original study) and exploratory (to explore the dimensions needed to explain the variability of the given answers) factor analysis using Varimax rotation. Convergent validity was calculated by Pearson’s correlation coefficient regarding the participant’s PHEEM score and participant’s overall satisfaction score of the added item “Overall, I am very satisfied with my specialization in this post”. Sensitivity was checked by comparing good versus poor aspects of the educational environment and by satisfied versus unsatisfied participants.

Results

A total of 731 residents from 83 hospitals and 41 prefectures responded to the PHEEM. The original three-factor model didn’t fit better compared to one factor model that is accounting for 32 % of the variance. Cronbach’s α was 0.933 when assuming one-factor model. Using a three-factor model (autonomy, teaching, social support), Cronbach’s α were 0.815 (expected 0.830), 0.908 (0.839), 0.734 (0.793), respectively. The three-factor model gave an RMSEA value of 0.074 (90 % confidence interval 0.071, 0.076), suggesting a fair fit. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between total PHEEM and global satisfaction was 0.765. Mean question scores ranged from 19.0 (very poor) to 73.7 (very good), and mean participant scores from 5.5 (very unsatisfied) to 96.5 (very satisfied).

Conclusions

The Greek version of PHEEM is a valid, reliable, and sensitive instrument measuring the educational environment among junior doctors in Greek hospitals and it can be used for evidence-based SWOT analysis and policy.

Institution and Specialty Contribute to Resident Satisfaction With Their Learning Environment and Workload

BACKGROUND

This large, multi-institutional study examines the relative contribution of residency specialty and institution to resident satisfaction with their learning environment and workload.

METHOD

Survey responses from 798 residents were linked to institution (N = 20) and specialty (N = 10) and to characteristics of individual residency programs (N = 126) derived from the FREIDA Online database. Hierar chical linear modeling was used to estimate relative contributions of these factors to resident satisfaction with workload and learning environment.

RESULTS

Institution had greater influence than specialty on resident ratings of satisfaction with their workload and learning environment. Institution and specialty accounted for more variance in satisfaction with workload than with the learning environment. There is evidence that characteristics of a given residency program in a given institution have additional impact beyond these main effects. However, characteristics of institutions or programs, such as program selectivity, off-duty periods, or number of faculty, did not explain statistically significant amounts of variance in resident satisfaction ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to quantify the degree to which institution and specialty contribute to differences in resident perceptions of their learning environment and workload. Although organizational and institutional cultures are presumed to influence the learning environment, estimating the size of these influences requires a multi-institutional and multispecialty dataset, such as this one. These results suggest that there is empirical justification for institutional interventions to improve the learning environment.

Considering Research Outcomes as Essential Tools for Medical Education Decision Making

As medical educators face the challenge of incorporating new content, learning methods, and assessment techniques into the curriculum, the need for rigorous medical education research to guide efficient and effective instructional planning increases. When done properly, well-designed education research can provide guidance for complex education decision making. In this Commentary, the authors consider the 2015 Research in Medical Education (RIME) research and review articles in terms of the critical areas in teaching and learning that they address. The broad categories include (1) assessment (the largest collection of RIME articles, including both feedback from learners and instructors and the reliability of learner assessment), (2) the institution's impact on the learning environment, (3) what can be learned from program evaluation, and (4) emerging issues in faculty development. While the articles in this issue are broad in scope and potential impact, the RIME committee noted few studies of sufficient rigor focusing on areas of diversity and diverse learners. Although challenging to investigate, the authors encourage continuing innovation in research focused on these important areas.

Creating learning momentum through overt teaching interactions during real acute care episodes

Clinical supervisors fulfill a dual responsibility towards patient care and learning during clinical activities. Assuming such roles in today's clinical environments may be challenging. Acute care environments present unique learning opportunities for medical trainees, as well as specific challenges. The goal of this paper was to better understand the specific contexts in which overt teaching interactions occurred in acute care environments. We conducted a naturalistic observational study based on constructivist grounded theory methodology. Using participant observation, we collected data on the teaching interactions occurring between clinical supervisors and medical trainees during 74 acute care episodes in the critical care unit of two academic centers, in Toronto, Canada. Three themes contributed to a better understanding of the conditions in which overt teaching interactions among trainees and clinical supervisors occurred during acute care episodes: seizing emergent learning opportunities, coming up against challenging conditions, and creating learning momentum. Our findings illustrate how overt learning opportunities emerged from certain clinical situations and how clinical supervisors and trainees could purposefully modify unfavorable learning conditions. None of the acute care episodes encountered in the critical care environment represented ideal conditions for learning. Yet, clinical supervisors and trainees succeeded in engaging in overt teaching interactions during many episodes. The educational value of these overt teaching interactions should be further explored, as well as the impact of interventions aimed at increasing their use in acute care environments.

Putting performance in context: the perceived influence of environmental factors on work-based performance

INTRODUCTION

Context shapes behaviours yet is seldom considered when assessing competence. Our objective was to explore attending physicians' and trainees' perceptions of the Internal Medicine Clinical Teaching Unit (CTU) environment and how they thought contextual factors affected their performance.

METHOD

29 individuals recently completing CTU rotations participated in nine level-specific focus groups (2 with attending physicians, 3 with senior and 2 with junior residents, and 2 with students). Participants were asked to identify environmental factors on the CTU and to describe how these factors influenced their own performance across CanMEDS roles. Discussions were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory.

RESULTS

Five major contextual factors were identified: Busyness, Multiple Hats, Other People, Educational Structures, and Hospital Resources and Policies. Busyness emerged as the most important, but all factors had a substantial perceived impact on performance. Participants felt their performance on the Manager and Scholar roles was most affected by environmental factors (mostly negatively, due to decreased efficiency and impact on learning).

CONCLUSIONS

In complex workplace environments, numerous factors shape performance. These contextual factors and their impact need to be considered in observations and judgements made about performance in the workplace, as without this understanding conclusions about competency may be flawed.

Creating an environment for patient safety and teamwork training in the operating theatre: A quasi-experimental study

INTRODUCTION

Positive safety and a teamwork climate in the training environment may be a precursor for successful teamwork training. This pilot project aimed to implement and test whether a new interdisciplinary and team-based approach would result in a positive training climate in the operating theatre.

METHOD

A 3-day educational module for training the complete surgical team of specialist nursing students and residents in safe teamwork skills in an authentic operative theatre, named Co-Op, was implemented in a university hospital. Participants' (n=22) perceptions of the 'safety climate' and the 'teamwork climate', together with their 'readiness for inter-professional learning', were measured to examine if the Co-Op module produced a positive training environment compared with the perceptions of a control group (n=11) attending the conventional curriculum.

RESULTS

The participants' perceptions of 'safety climate' and 'teamwork climate' and their 'readiness for inter-professional learning' scores were significantly higher following the Co-Op module compared with their perceptions following the conventional curriculum, and compared with the control group's perceptions following the conventional curriculum.

CONCLUSION

The Co-Op module improved 'safety climate' and 'teamwork climate' in the operating theatre, which suggests that a deliberate and designed educational intervention can shape a learning environment as a model for the establishment of a safety culture.

Clinical learning environment measurement for medical trainees at transitions: relations with socio-cultural factors and mental distress

BACKGROUND

Measuring clinical learning environment is crucial for the quality improvement of medical education, especially for medical trainees at transition stages. Medical education in Taiwan is shaped by multiple socio-cultural influences. The aims of this study were to construct an instrument for measuring clinical learning environment in alignment with the local socio-cultural factors and medical training settings, and further investigate the relationship between the quality of the clinical learning environment and the status of mental distress among medical trainees.

METHODS

Participants consisted of 189 medical trainees (62 interns, 52 postgraduate year one (PGY1) residents, and 75 senior residents). Instruments included a designed 40-item Clinical Learning Environment Questionnaire (CLENQ) and a five-item Brief Symptoms Rating Scale (BSRS-5) for evaluating mental distress. Constructs of CLENQ were examined using factor analysis. Correlations were calculated between BSRS-5 and CLENQ across the three levels of medical trainees.

RESULTS

Factor analysis of CLENQ yielded five factors- I: Teaching (13 items), II: Workload (7 items), III: Relationship pressure (9 items), IV: Organisational support (4 items) and V: Mutual trust (6 items). Intern trainees reported the lower total CLENQ scores in comparison to PGY1 and senior resident trainees. Mental distress using BSRS-5 was negatively correlated with total CLENQ scores and several key factors in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study using CLENQ has identified five major factors of clinical learning environment that are closely linked with our local socio-cultural factors and medical training settings. Medical trainee's mental distress status was negatively correlated with the quality of CLENQ. These findings have socio-cultural relevance and medical contextual significance and might be applicable to other countries. It warrants further study to investigate the impact of clinical learning environment improvement on the medical trainee's mental distress and performance.

Content and timing of feedback and reflection: a multi-center qualitative study of experienced bedside teachers

BACKGROUND

Competency-based medical education increasingly recognizes the importance of observation, feedback, and reflection for trainee development. Although bedside rounds provide opportunities for authentic workplace-based implementation of feedback and team-based reflection strategies, this relationship has not been well described. The authors sought to understand the content and timing of feedback and team-based reflection provided by bedside teachers in the context of patient-centered bedside rounds.

METHODS

The authors conducted a thematic analysis qualitative study using transcripts from audio-recorded, semi-structured telephone interviews with internal medicine attending physicians (n= 34) identified as respected bedside teachers from 10 academic US institutions (2010-2011).

RESULTS

Half of the respondents (50%) were associate/full professors, with an average of 14 years of academic experience. In the context of bedside encounters, bedside teachers reported providing feedback on history-taking, physical-examination, and case-presentation skills, patient-centered communication, clinical decision-making, leadership, teaching skills, and professionalism. Positive feedback about physical-exam skills or clinical decision-making occurred during encounters, positive or constructive team-based feedback occurred immediately following encounters, and individualized constructive feedback occurred in one-on-one settings following rounding sessions. Compared to less frequent, emotionally-charged events, bedside teachers initiated team-based reflection on commonplace "teachable moments" related to patient characteristics or emotions, trainee actions and emotions, and attending physician role modeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside teachers use bedside rounds as a workplace-based method to provide assessment, feedback, and reflection, which are aligned with the goals of competency-based medical education. Embedded in patient-centered activities, clinical teachers should be encouraged to incorporate these content- and timing-related feedback and reflection strategies into their bedside teaching.

Learning culture and feedback: an international study of medical athletes and musicians

OBJECTIVES

Feedback should facilitate learning, but within medical education it often fails to deliver on its promise. To better understand why feedback is challenging, we explored the unique perspectives of doctors who had also trained extensively in sport or music, aiming to: (i) distinguish the elements of the response to feedback that are determined by the individual learner from those determined by the learning culture, and (ii) understand how these elements interact in order to make recommendations for improving feedback in medical education.

METHODS

Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 doctors or medical students who had high-level training and competitive or performance experience in sport (n = 15) or music (n = 12). Data were analysed iteratively using constant comparison. Key themes were identified and their relationships critically examined to derive a conceptual understanding of feedback and its impact.

RESULTS

We identified three essential sources of influence on the meaning that feedback assumed: the individual learner; the characteristics of the feedback, and the learning culture. Individual learner traits, such as motivation and orientation toward feedback, appeared stable across learning contexts. Similarly, certain feedback characteristics, including specificity, credibility and actionability, were valued in sport, music and medicine alike. Learning culture influenced feedback in three ways: (i) by defining expectations for teachers and teacher-learner relationships; (ii) by establishing norms for and expectations of feedback, and (iii) by directing teachers' and learners' attention toward certain dimensions of performance. Learning culture therefore neither creates motivated learners nor defines 'good feedback'; rather, it creates the conditions and opportunities that allow good feedback to occur and learners to respond.

CONCLUSIONS

An adequate understanding of feedback requires an integrated approach incorporating both the individual and the learning culture. Our research offers a clear direction for medicine's learning culture: normalise feedback; promote trusting teacher-learner relationships; define clear performance goals, and ensure that the goals of learners and teachers align.

Acquisition and retention of basic pathophysiological knowledge in psychiatry

OBJECTIVE

An important and yet underexplored issue in medical education concerns the extent to which students retain early taught theoretical knowledge during subsequent stages of their academic schooling. This study aimed to assess the degree to which medical students retain basic pathophysiological knowledge on biological psychiatry across different stages of medical education.

METHODS

A cross-sectional investigation was conducted using a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) of objective pathophysiological knowledge taught in a course given to second-year students, supplemented by questions measuring subjective interest and attributed importance to the content taught. Comparisons (ANOVA with post hoc Tukey tests) were carried out among five groups (n = 417): baseline (freshmen), pre-intervention group (second-year students attending the first day of the course), immediate tested group (second-year students on the final day of the course), 1-year delayed tested group (third-year students), and 3-years delayed tested group (interns).

RESULTS

In comparison to the baseline and pre-intervention groups, the other three groups that received teaching displayed significantly better levels of knowledge (p < 0.0001). Differently, scores of interest and attributed importance were higher in the pre-intervention group relative to all other groups that were tested after having been given the course (p < 0.005). There were no significant associations between knowledge retention, attributed importance, and interest within pre-intervention or post-intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The only modest loss of knowledge over time indicates that a large proportion of early taught content is retained throughout the later years of medical education. Nevertheless, retained knowledge does not seem to be associated with subjective interest and attributed importance to such early taught content.

Why supervisors should promote feedback-seeking behaviour in medical residency

BACKGROUND

Individual disposition of goal orientation and situational factors of the working context, both generate and modulate motives to seek feedback.

AIM

We looked for correlations between feedback-seeking and individual goal orientation, motives or concerns of feedback-seeking, working context of medical residents. We focussed on how promotion of feedback-seeking by supervisors and educational environment influenced motives and behaviours of feedback-seeking in residents.

METHODS

Web-based administration of a Likert-type composite questionnaire to residents of a tertiary care teaching hospital in Switzerland and mini-interviews.

RESULTS

Fifty-six (45%) of 125 residents completed the questionnaire. After multiple regression analysis promotion of feedback-seeking through supervisors remained the sole predictor correlating with feedback-seeking through inquiry (R(2) = 16) and the motive of self-improvement (R(2) = 0.30). This predictor was also associated with reduced concerns of ego-protection (R(2) = 0.14) and impression-defence (R(2) = 0.18). Performance-avoid goal orientation was associated with concerns of impression-defence (R(2) = 0.36) and ego-protection (R(2) = 0.48). Women had significantly more concerns of ego-protection, residents with more than three years of experience more concerns of impression-defence. Disillusion that PG-training would ever improve, seemed the main reason to refuse participation

CONCLUSIONS

Promotion of feedback-seeking through supervisors combined with delivery of high quality feedback may guide residents towards seeking feedback for professional self-improvement.

Reframing clinical workplace learning using the theory of distributed cognition

In medicine, knowledge is embodied and socially, temporally, spatially, and culturally distributed between actors and their environment. In addition, clinicians increasingly are using technology in their daily work to gain and share knowledge. Despite these characteristics, surprisingly few studies have incorporated the theory of distributed cognition (DCog), which emphasizes how cognition is distributed in a wider system in the form of multimodal representations (e.g., clinical images, speech, gazes, and gestures) between social actors (e.g., doctors and patients) in the physical environment (e.g., with technological instruments and computers). In this article, the authors provide an example of an interaction between medical actors. Using that example, they then introduce the important concepts of the DCog theory, identifying five characteristics of clinical representations-that they are interwoven, co-constructed, redundantly accessed, intersubjectively shared, and substantiated-and discuss their value for learning. By contrasting these DCog perspectives with studies from the field of medical education, the authors argue that researchers should focus future medical education scholarship on the ways in which medical actors use and connect speech, bodily movements (e.g., gestures), and the visual and haptic structures of their own bodies and of artifacts, such as technological instruments and computers, to construct complex, multimodal representations. They also argue that future scholarship should "zoom in" on detailed, moment-by-moment analysis and, at the same time, "zoom out" following the distribution of cognition through an overall system to develop a more integrated view of clinical workplace learning.

Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback

CONTEXT

Although feedback is widely considered essential to learning, its actual influence on learners is variable. Research on responsivity to feedback has tended to focus on individual rather than social or cultural influences on learning. In this study, we explored how feedback is handled within different professional cultures, and how the characteristics and values of a profession shape learners' responses to feedback.

METHODS

Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, we conducted 12 focus groups and nine individual interviews (with a total of 50 participants) across three cultures of professional training in, respectively, music, teacher training and medicine. Constant comparative analysis for recurring themes was conducted iteratively.

RESULTS

Each of the three professional cultures created a distinct context for learning that influenced how feedback was handled. Despite these contextual differences, credibility and constructiveness emerged as critical constants, identified by learners across cultures as essential for feedback to be perceived as meaningful. However, the definitions of credibility and constructiveness were distinct to each professional culture and the cultures varied considerably in how effectively they supported the occurrence of feedback with these critical characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Professions define credibility and constructiveness in culturally specific ways and create contexts for learning that may either facilitate or constrain the provision of meaningful feedback. Comparison with other professional cultures may offer strategies for creating a productive feedback culture within medical education.

How core competencies are taught during clinical supervision: participatory action research in family medicine

OBJECTIVES

The development of professional competence is the main goal of residency training. Clinical supervision is the most commonly used teaching and learning method for the development of core competencies (CCs). The literature provides little information on how to encourage the learning of CCs through supervision. We undertook an exploratory study to describe if and how CCs were addressed during supervision in a family medicine residency programme.

METHODS

We selected a participatory action research design to engage participants in exploring their precepting practices. Eleven volunteer faculty staff and six residents from a large family medicine residency programme took part in a 9-month process which included three focus group encounters alternating with data gathering during supervision. We used mostly qualitative methods for data collection and analysis, with thematic content analysis, triangulation of sources and of researchers, and member checking.

RESULTS

Participants realised that they addressed all CCs listed as programme outcomes during clinical supervision, albeit implicitly and intuitively, and often unconsciously and superficially. We identified a series of factors that influenced the discussion of CCs: (i) CCs must be both known and valued; (ii) discussion of CCs occurs in a constant adaptation to numerous contextual factors, such as residents' characteristics; (iii) the teaching and learning of CCs is influenced by six challenges in the preceptor-resident interaction, such as residents' active engagement, and (iv) coherence with other curricular elements contributes to learning about CCs. Differences between residents' and preceptors' perspectives are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first descriptive study focusing on the teaching of CCs during clinical supervision, as experienced in a family medicine residency programme. Content and process issues were equally influential on the discussion of CCs. Our findings led to a representation of factors determining the teaching and learning of CCs in supervision, and suggest directions for research, for faculty development, and for interventions with learners.

Trainees' perceptions of patient safety practices: recounting failures of supervision

BACKGROUND

Ensuring that trainees receive appropriate clinical supervision is one proven method for improving patient safety outcomes. Yet, supervision is difficult to monitor, even more so during advanced levels of training. The manner in which trainees' perceived failures of supervision influenced patient safety practices across disciplines and various levels of training was investigated.

METHODS

A brief, open-ended questionnaire, administered to 334 newly hired interns, residents, and fellows, asked for descriptions of situations in which they witnessed a failure of supervision and their corresponding response.

RESULTS

Of the 265 trainees completing the survey, 73 (27.5%) indicated having witnessed a failure of supervision. The analysis of these responses revealed three types of supervision failures-monitoring, guidance, and feedback. The necessity of adequate supervision and its accompanying consequences were also highlighted in the participants responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study identify two primary sources of failures of supervision: supervisors' failure to respond to trainees' seeking of guidance or clinical support and trainees' failure to seek such support. The findings suggest that the learning environment's influence was sufficient to cause trainees to value their appearance to superiors more than safe patient care, suggesting that trainees' feelings may supersede patients' needs and jeopardize optimal treatment. The literature on the impact of disruptive behavior on patient care may also improve understanding of how intimidating and abusive behavior stifles effective communication and trainees' ability to provide optimal patient care. Improved supervision and communication within the medical hierarchy should not only create more productive learning environments but also improve patient safety.