Impact of baseline polymorphisms in RT and protease on outcome of highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected African patients

Changes in Primary HIV-1 Drug Resistance Due to War Migration from Eastern Europe

In recent years, especially as a result of war in Ukraine, enormous movements of migration to Poland from eastern European countries have been reported, including people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). We have conducted multi-center, prospective study, which aimed to establish HIV-1 subtype and assess the presence of primary drug resistance mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors in antiretroviral treatment naïve patients. The clinical trial recruited 117 individuals during 2 years period (2020-2022). The prevalence of HIV-1 subtype A was statistically significantly more frequent in Ukrainian, and HIV-1 subtype B in Polish patients (p < 0.05). Drug resistance mutations were detected in 44% of all cases and the comparison of presence of mutations in the analyzed groups, as well as in the subgroups of subtype A and B HIV-1 has not revealed any significant differences (p > 0.05), nevertheless Polish patients had multidrug resistance mutations more frequent (p < 0.05). The results from our trial show no increased risk of transmission of multidrug resistant HIV strains in our cohort of Ukrainian migrants.Clinical trials. Gov number NCT04636736; date of registration: November 19, 2020.

Virological suppression in children and adolescents is not influenced by genotyping, but depends on optimal adherence to antiretroviral therapy

Objective

To evaluate the virological outcomes in children and adolescents infected with HIV-1 in Salvador, Bahia according to genotyping results.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the rates of virological suppression of children and adolescents submitted to HIV-1 genotyping test from January/2008 to December/2012. The participants were followed in the two referral centers for pediatric AIDS care, in Salvador, Brazil. Resistance mutations, drug sensitivity profiles, and viral subtypes were analyzed using the Stanford HIV-1 Drug Resistance Database. Adherence was estimated by drugs withdrawal at pharmacies of the two sites.

Results

101 subjects were included: 35 (34.6%) were drug-naïve, and the remaining 66 were failing ART. In drug-naïve group, 3 (8.6%), presented with NNRTIs resistance mutations, along with polymorphic mutations to PIs in most (82.8%) of them. Among the failing therapy group, we detected a high frequency (89.4%) of resistance mutations to PIs, NRTI (84.8%), and NNRTI (59.1%). Virological suppression after introduction/modification of genotyping-guided ART was achieved only for patients (53.1%) with drug withdrawal over 95%. Main detected HIV-1 subtypes were B (67.3%), F (7.9), C (1.9%), and recombinant forms (22.9%).

Conclusions

Despite the use of genotyping tests in guidance of a more effective antiretroviral regimen, poor adherence to ART seems to be the main determinant of low virological suppression rate for children and adolescents, in Salvador, Brazil.

Mutations and Polymorphisms Associated with Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-1C-Infected African Patients

To detect and characterize polymerase gene ( pol) polymorphisms and mutation patterns in HIV-1C-infected Batswana patients treated with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, samples from AIDS patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were sequenced for the region encompassing the entire HIV-1 protease (PR) and the first 335 amino acids of reverse transcriptase (RT). Amongst the 16 patients treated with antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, eight started HAART regimens containing didanosine, stavudine and nevirapine (ddI/d4T/NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) (arm A) while the others started with zidovudine (AZT) and lamivudine (3TC) given together as combivir (CBV) with either NVP or EFV as arm B. Arm B is the first line regimen currently provided by the Botswana ARV national programme. Greater efficacy, in terms of treatment duration, was observed in patients in arm B (14 months) as compared with patients in arm A (9 months); P<0.05, n=8. Appearance of the M184V mutation in the arm B patients coincided with a rebound of viral load (VL) (4.3 +0.1 log10 RNA copies/ml) and a significantly improved immunological parameter (ΔCD4=207.0 +48.1 cells/μl; P<0.05). Interestingly, patients developing the M184V mutation preferentially harboured polymorphisms Q174K and/or I178L located in close proximity to pol position 184. The M184V mutation occurred following a clear clinical benefit consisting of increased CD4 cell counts and lower plasma viral loads. Primary mutations known to be associated with NNRTI and NRTI resistance for HIV-1B were observed in 10 of the 16 treated patients.

HIV-1 Subtype C Drug-Resistance Background among ARV-Naive Adults in Botswana

Current HIV-1 antiretroviral (ARV) drug resistance knowledge is limited to HIV-1 subtype B (HIV-1B). We addressed whether unique genetic and phenotypic properties of HIV-1 subtype C (HIV-1C), southern Africa's most prevalent subtype, may foment earlier and/or distinct resistance mutations. Population-level HIV-1C genotypes were evaluated with respect to drug resistance prevalence before Botswana's public ARV treatment programme began. Viruses were genotyped from 11 representative districts of northern and southern Botswana, and consensus sequences from these 71 individuals and 51 previously reported sequences from HIV-positive blood donors were constructed. Phylogenetic analysis classified all 71 sequences but one, which exhibited pol gene mosaicism, as HIV-1C. The protease and reverse transcriptase coding region had no detectable known primary mutations associated with HIV-1B protease inhibitor (PI) drug resistance. Secondary mutations associated with PI drug resistance were found in all sequences. Several HIV-1C—specific polymorphic sites were found across the pol gene. Northern and southern Botswana viral sequences showed no significant differences from each other. Population genotyping shows that, without countrywide ARV treatment, HIV-1C—infected Batswana harbour virtually no primary mutations known to confer resistance to the three major HIV-1B ARV drug classes. Some secondary PI mutations and polymorphic sites in the protease enzyme necessitate continuous population monitoring, particularly after introduction of countrywide ARV treatment in Botswana. Although its PI resistance development rate and kinetics are not known, our data may suggest increased susceptibility and readiness of HIV-1C to develop resistance under drug pressure when the PI class of drugs is used.

HIV-1 genetic variation and drug resistance development

Up until 10 years ago, basic and clinical HIV-1 research was mainly performed on HIV-1 subtype B that predominated in resource-rich settings. Over the past decade, HIV-1 care and therapy has been scaled up substantially in Latin America, Africa and Asia. These regions are largely dominated by non-B subtype infections, and especially the African continent is affected by the HIV pandemic. Insight on the potency of antiviral drugs and regimens as well as on the emergence of drug resistance in non-B subtypes was lacking triggering research in this field, also partly driven by the introduction and spreading of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in Europe. The scope of this article was to review and discuss the state-of-the-art on the impact of HIV-1 genetic variation on the in vitro activity of antiviral drugs and in vivo response to antiviral therapy; as well as on the in vitro and in vivo emergence of drug resistance.

Minor protease inhibitor mutations at baseline do not increase the risk for a virological failure in HIV-1 subtype B infected patients

Background

Minor protease inhibitor (PI) mutations often exist as polymorphisms in HIV-1 sequences from treatment-naïve patients. Previous studies showed that their presence impairs the antiretroviral treatment (ART) response. Evaluating these findings in a larger cohort is essential.

Methods

To study the impact of minor PI mutations on time to viral suppression and time to virological failure, we included patients from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study infected with HIV-1 subtype B who started first-line ART with a PI and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Cox regression models were performed to compare the outcomes among patients with 0 and ≥1 minor PI mutation. Models were adjusted for baseline HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count, sex, transmission category, age, ethnicity, year of ART start, the presence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor mutations, and stratified for the administered PIs.

Results

We included 1199 patients of whom 944 (78.7%) received a boosted PI. Minor PI mutations associated with the administered PI were common: 41.7%, 16.1%, 4.7% and 1.9% had 1, 2, 3 or ≥4 mutations, respectively. The time to viral suppression was similar between patients with 0 (reference) and ≥1 minor PI mutation (multivariable hazard ratio (HR): 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0–1.3], P = .196). The time to virological failure was also similar (multivariable HR:.9 [95% CI:.5–1.6], P = .765). In addition, the impact of each single minor PI mutation was analyzed separately: none was significantly associated with the treatment outcome.

Conclusions

The presence of minor PI mutations at baseline has no effect on the therapy outcome in HIV infected individuals.

Virologic failure of protease inhibitor-based second-line antiretroviral therapy without resistance in a large HIV treatment program in South Africa

BACKGROUND

We investigated the prevalence of wild-type virus (no major drug resistance) and drug resistance mutations at second-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) failure in a large HIV treatment program in South Africa.

METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

HIV-infected patients ≥ 15 years of age who had failed protease inhibitor (PI)-based second-line ART (2 consecutive HIV RNA tests >1000 copies/ml on lopinavir/ritonavir, didanosine, and zidovudine) were identified retrospectively. Patients with virologic failure were continued on second-line ART. Genotypic testing for drug resistance was performed on frozen plasma samples obtained closest to and after the date of laboratory confirmed second-line ART failure. Of 322 HIV-infected patients on second-line ART, 43 were adults with confirmed virologic failure, and 33 had available plasma for viral sequencing. HIV-1 RNA subtype C predominated (n = 32, 97%). Mean duration on ART (SD) prior to initiation of second-line ART was 23 (17) months, and time from second-line ART initiation to failure was 10 (9) months. Plasma samples were obtained 7(9) months from confirmed failure. At second-line failure, 22 patients (67%) had wild-type virus. There was no major resistance to PIs found. Eleven of 33 patients had a second plasma sample taken 8 (5.5) months after the first. Median HIV-1 RNA and the genotypic resistance profile were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE

Most patients who failed second-line ART had wild-type virus. We did not observe evolution of resistance despite continuation of PI-based ART after failure. Interventions that successfully improve adherence could allow patients to continue to benefit from second-line ART therapy even after initial failure.

In vitro susceptibility and virological outcome to darunavir and lopinavir are independent of HIV type-1 subtype in treatment-naive patients

BACKGROUND

The effect of HIV type-1 (HIV-1) subtype on in vitro susceptibility and virological response to darunavir (DRV) and lopinavir (LPV) was studied using a broad panel of primary isolates, and in recombinant clinical isolates from treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients in the Phase III trial, AntiRetroviral Therapy with TMC114 ExaMined In naive Subjects (ARTEMIS).

METHODS

Patients received DRV/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily (n=343) or LPV/ritonavir (LPV/r) 800/200 mg total daily dose (n=346), plus a fixed daily dose of emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

RESULTS

DRV demonstrated high antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 major group (M) and outlier group (O) primary isolates in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with a median 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) of 0.52 nM. Most (61%) patients in ARTEMIS harboured HIV-1 subtype B; other prevalent subtypes were C (13%) and CRF01_AE (17%); 9% harboured other subtypes. Median EC(50) values (interquartile range) for DRV were 1.79 nM (1.3-2.6) for subtype B, 1.12 nM (0.8-1.4) for C and 1.27 nM (1.0-1.7) for CRF01_AE. Virological response to DRV/r (HIV-1 RNA<50 copies/ml [intent-to-treat, time-to-loss of virological response algorithm]) was 81%, 87% and 85% for patients with subtype B, C and CRF01_AE infections, respectively. Similar results were observed in the LPV/r treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro susceptibility to DRV was comparable across HIV-1 subtypes in a broad panel of primary isolates and in recombinant clinical isolates. Once daily DRV/r 800/100 mg and LPV/r 800/200 mg were highly effective in ARTEMIS irrespective of the HIV-1 subtype studied, confirming their broad anti-HIV-1 activity.

Evolution of HIV-1 in a patient population failing multiple-drug therapy

To understand the evolutionary pathway of the multi-drug-resistant virus HIV-1 under drug-induced selection pressure, plasma from seven patients from baseline to different intervals post-treatment failure were used in RT-PCR protocols. Multiple clones were sequenced for each time point. Drug-resistant mutations were detected in five patients. Phylogenetic analysis showed that at different time points, viral sequences clustered separately and formed independent lineages. Genetic diversity decreased from 1.59 to 0.55, whereas non-synonymous/synonymous mutation ratios increased from 0.067 to 0.118, respectively. These data suggest that the virus population changed dynamically and clustered in a time point-specific manner whereas genetic diversity decreased consistently.

Transmitted drug resistance in nonsubtype B HIV-1 infection

HIV-1 nonsubtype B variants account for the majority of HIV infections worldwide. Drug resistance in individuals who have never undergone antiretroviral therapy can lead to early failure and limited treatment options and, therefore, is an important concern. Evaluation of reported transmitted drug resistance (TDR) is challenging owing to varying definitions and study designs, and is further complicated by HIV-1 subtype diversity. In this article, we discuss the importance of various mutation lists for TDR definition, summarize TDR in nonsubtype B HIV-1 and highlight TDR reporting and interpreting challenges in the context of HIV-1 diversity. When examined carefully, TDR in HIV-1 non-B protease and reverse transcriptase is still relatively low in most regions. Whether it will increase with time and therapy access, as observed in subtype-B-predominant regions, remains to be determined.

Drug resistance differences among HIV types and subtypes: a growing problem

Although HIV-1 subtype B accounts for only 10% of worldwide HIV infections, almost all knowledge regarding antiretroviral (ARV) drug development and viral resistance is based on this subtype. More recently, an increasing body of evidence suggests that distinct HIV genetic variants possess different biological properties, including susceptibility and response to ARVs. In this review, we will summarize recent in vitro and in vivo studies reporting such differences. In general terms, infections with most HIV variants respond well to ARVs, but minor differences in susceptibility, in the emergence and selection of subtype-specific drug resistance mutations and in the acquisition of similar mutations over the period of ARV exposure have been reported. Such differences impact on drugresistance interpretation algorithms, which are mostly based on inference from sequence information. Despite the differences observed, clinical response to ARV therapy among subjects infected with distinct HIV variants is effective, and the dissemination of ARV access in developing countries where non-B subtypes prevail should not be delayed.

Natural polymorphisms in HIV-1 protease: impact on effectiveness of a first-line lopinavir-containing antiretroviral therapy regimen

Mutations on HIV protease lead to resistance to protease inhibitors. However, resistance development may be different according to primary, secondary or polymorphic mutations. The present study was designed to assess the impact of natural protease mutations on the effectiveness of a first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), and secondarily, their effect on the initial viral load (VL). The study was conducted in 175 HIV-1-infected patients, who initiated a first-line lopinavir/r-containing ART regimen and who had an available genotype resistance testing before initiating therapy. We assessed the association between mutations (prevalence > or = 10%) and the initial VL. We assessed the association between mutations and ART effectiveness using two surrogate markers: the slope of VL decrease at 1 month and the time to VL undetectability. For the 175 patients, the initial median VL was 4.94 log(10) copies/ml [interquartile range: 4.44-5.47] and the initial median CD4 lymphocyte count, 219/microl [129-296]. Eighteen mutations had a prevalence > or = 10%. At 1 month, the median VL decrease was 2.35 log(10) copies/ml [1.76-2.82]. The median time to VL undetectability was 128 days [91-196]. No mutation was associated significantly with the initial VL, the slope of VL decrease at 1 month or the time to VL undetectability. This study of antiretroviral-naive patients showed that protease polymorphisms had no impact on the effectiveness of a lopinavir/r-containing ART regimen. However, polymorphisms may affect ART effectiveness differently in other populations, such as ART-experienced patients and/or patients treated with protease inhibitors other than the one used here.

Bayesian network analyses of resistance pathways against efavirenz and nevirapine

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the role of novel mutations selected by treatment with efavirenz or nevirapine, and investigate the influence of HIV-1 subtype on nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nNRTI) resistance pathways.

DESIGN

By finding direct dependencies between treatment-selected mutations, the involvement of these mutations as minor or major resistance mutations against efavirenz, nevirapine, or coadministrated nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is hypothesized. In addition, direct dependencies were investigated between treatment-selected mutations and polymorphisms, some of which are linked with subtype, and between NRTI and nNRTI resistance pathways.

METHODS

Sequences from a large collaborative database of various subtypes were jointly analyzed to detect mutations selected by treatment. Using Bayesian network learning, direct dependencies were investigated between treatment-selected mutations, NRTI and nNRTI treatment history, and known NRTI resistance mutations.

RESULTS

Several novel minor resistance mutations were found: 28K and 196R (for resistance against efavirenz), 101H and 138Q (nevirapine), and 31L (lamivudine). Robust interactions between NRTI mutations (65R, 74V, 75I/M, and 184V) and nNRTI resistance mutations (100I, 181C, 190E and 230L) may affect resistance development to particular treatment combinations. For example, an interaction between 65R and 181C predicts that the nevirapine and tenofovir and lamivudine/emtricitabine combination should be more prone to failure than efavirenz and tenofovir and lamivudine/emtricitabine.

CONCLUSION

Bayesian networks were helpful in untangling the selection of mutations by NRTI versus nNRTI treatment, and in discovering interactions between resistance mutations within and between these two classes of inhibitors.

Significance of variation within HIV, EBV, and KSHV subtypes

Since their initial transmission to humans, viruses have diversified extensively through recombination and mutation. The presence of intra- and inter-individual viral diversity influences disease progression, drug resistance, and therapy and presumably explains the conflicting results in many studies, including the failure of peptide-based vaccination strategies. Although HIV is a small RNA virus, coinfection with large DNA viruses, notably the oncogenic gamma-herpesviridae human herpesvirus-8 and Epstein Barr virus, is common. This coinfection occurs secondary to immunosuppression and shared transmission routes with high-risk predisposing behavior. In addition, all 3 of these viruses can lead to chronic infections, long periods of latency, and reactivation characterized by pain and suffering. The efficient targeting of their genetic diversity represents one of the major challenges in their control, both in prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. An understanding of diversity will help delineate whether population-specific vaccine strategies are necessary.

Expected response to protease inhibitors of HIV-1 non-B subtype viruses according to resistance algorithms

The expected effectiveness of protease inhibitors was assessed according to the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS), Rega and Stanford 2007 resistance algorithms in 93 and 87 antiretroviral therapy-naive patients, respectively, infected with B and non-B subtype viruses. Either B or non-B subtypes were considered fully susceptible to protease inhibitors, except to tipranavir/ritonavir, for which the 2007 ANRS algorithm scored non-B subtypes as naturally resistant when this algorithm was extended to these subtypes.

Clinical impact of HIV-1 subtype: are there important differences?

The enormous genetic diversity of HIV-1 is a major challenge to vaccine development and may have important clinical consequences. HIV-1 group M predominates globally, with nine subtypes, several sub-subtypes and over 30 circulating recombinant forms that may exhibit differences with respect to transmissibility, pathogenicity and development of antiretroviral resistance. Subtype D appears to be more virulent than other subtypes, in particular subtype A. Subtype C may be less virulent and more transmissible, although the evidence for this is inconclusive. All group M non-B subtypes appear to be equally susceptible to combination antiretroviral therapy, but development of resistance mutations may vary significantly between subtypes. Further research into the clinical implications of HIV-1 diversity is crucial for effective HIV-1 prevention and treatment.

Genetic polymorphisms and resistance mutations of HIV type 2 in antiretroviral-naive patients in Burkina Faso

Natural polymorphisms in the pol gene of HIV-2 may influence the susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs and the choice of treatment. We collected samples in centers for anonymous HIV testing in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, in patients supposedly naive for any antiretroviral treatment. Eighty-four samples were first tested as HIV-2 positive in Burkina Faso and then shipped to Brussels, Belgium, for confirmation of the serological status and plasma viral load. Fifty-two samples were confirmed as HIV-2 positive in Belgium. Twelve others were HIV-1 positive and 20 were dually reactive. Twenty-one of HIV-2 confirmed samples had an HIV-2 plasma viral load higher than 1000 copies/ml. These viruses were sequenced in the protease and reverse trancriptase genes and 17 sequences of the pol gene were obtained. Highly polymorphic positions were identified in protease and RT genes. Two samples harbored known resistance mutations: M184V RT mutation in one and Q151M with M184V in the other. Phylogenetic analysis showed that viruses in Burkina Faso did not cluster separately from published sequences from neighboring countries. The two resistant strains were unrelated. Our findings imply either that resistant viruses are circulating in Burkina Faso or that some individuals take unsupervised treatment. Both hypotheses present problems.

Transmitted Resistance: An Overview and Its Potential Relevance to the Management of HIV-Infected Persons in Resource-Limited Settings

Transmitted resistance has become an important clinical problem in developed countries with long histories of antiretroviral use. In resource-limited settings, it is a foreseeable, if not insidiously emerging, issue. Any transmission route or currently approved antiretroviral drug may be involved. The clinical relevance of polymorphisms that commonly occur at sites known to be associated with resistance, and peculiarities of the non-B subtypes, are incompletely understood. Adverse clinical consequences that have been demonstrated with transmitted resistance include an increased risk of failing initial therapy and further development of resistance. Although treatment outcomes can be optimized by baseline resistance testing and virologic monitoring, these are impractical in most resource-limited settings at this time. The scale and impact of transmitted resistance can probably be reduced by comprehensive prevention and management strategies. Equally germane are epidemiological and clinical studies to extend understanding of the dynamics, clinical implications, and management of transmitted resistance.

Impact of genetic variation of HIV-1 on drug resistance development

HIV is a particularly diverse virus and can be classified into different types, groups and subtypes. Most of the current knowledge is based on HIV-1 subtype B, which is responsible for the first recognized epidemic, mainly spreading in the developed world, while the other subtypes are responsible for the major part of the pandemic, primarily in the developing world. Interest in the so-called ‘non-B’ subtypes is increasing, with treatment programs expanding to include Africa and Asia. According to several recent studies, differences exist between subtypes regarding drug susceptibility, resistance development and therapy response. Currently, conclusions are often based on too few patients or samples, and the use of different resistance assays and analysis methods makes it difficult to compare results. A common mistake is to pool subtypes and recombinants together as ‘non-B subtypes’, although they differ among each other as much as they differ from subtype B. Europe, with large epidemics of subtype B and several non-B subtypes in similar patient populations, is well placed to take the lead in this research field.

HIV resistance and the developing world

Rollout of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited countries has been identified as a global public health priority. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment in the industrialised world is routinely accompanied by regular virological monitoring. By contrast, the implementation of ART in resource-limited settings requires use of standard first- and second-line therapy. One major consequence is the likely emergence of high-level resistance during first-line therapy since most people will stay on a virologically failing regimen for longer periods, potentially compromising the efficacy of second-line therapy. The evidence regarding resistance to triple-drug ART relates to the time at which virological failure occurs in populations from developed countries, with little data from resource-poor contexts where monitoring strategies, HIV subtypes and drug combinations are likely to differ.

Management of advanced HIV disease with no other complications in women and in Africans

The number of patients who present with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease [defined as a helper lymphocyte (CD4) count <50 cells/mm3 or the presence of an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining illness] is increasing. In the USA during 1994-1999, a relatively stable proportion of 43% of people diagnosed with HIV infection were tested late in the infection (had AIDS diagnosed within 1 year of diagnosis). A recent review of newly diagnosed infections in 2003 found that 301/977 (31%) of patients in the UK and Ireland presented late (<200 CD4 cells/mm3). Before a diagnosis is made, patients with advanced disease do not benefit from antiretroviral therapy and may continue to transmit the infection to others. Furthermore, when antiretroviral therapy is initiated in patients with CD4 counts of 201-350 cells/mm(3), the risk of death is lower than when treatment is started at lower CD4 cell counts. With the increasing prevalence of HIV in women and African immigrants, some doctors are concerned that different management approaches need to be used in these groups. This article reviews the evidence and some clinical scenarios for patients with advanced disease without complications and women and Africans who may present with advanced HIV disease. The aim is to offer practical advice on therapeutic options for treatment-naïve patients who present with advanced HIV disease on the basis of available clinical evidence.

Analysis of polymorphism in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes of HIV type 1 CRF02-AG subtypes from drug-naive patients from Saint-Etienne, France

SUMMARY

: The proportion of non-B HIV-1 variants is increasing in Western Europe. The impact of the high polymorphism in the protease and reverse transcriptase genes, as recently described for CRF02-AG isolates of African origin, on antiretroviral resistance is still disputed. We first examined the polymorphism of these genes in CRF02-AG strains recovered from drug-naive patients followed at the University Hospital of Saint-Etienne in France, most of these of French origin and harboring a clonal strain as elicited by phylogenic analysis. The first plasma sample detected positive from 31 CRF02-AG and 23 B strains was used to compare sequences with their respective subtype consensus strain. The overall number of mutations was dramatically higher for CRF02-AG strains than for B strains in both protease and reverse transcriptase genes (P < 0.0001 and 0.009, respectively). In addition, no statistically significant difference in the number of therapeutic failures, mean CD4 cell count, and viral load was observed between 22 and 45 patients infected with CRF02-AG or B strains, respectively, during a mean treatment period of 25.5 months. Even if no striking antiretroviral failure linked to this polymorphism was observed during short-term follow-up, its impact on long-term therapy will have to be extensively evaluated in patients infected by non-B HIV-1 variants.

Subtype-specific patterns in HIV Type 1 reverse transcriptase and protease in Oyo State, Nigeria: implications for drug resistance and host response

As the use of antiretroviral therapy becomes more widespread across Africa, it is imperative to characterize baseline molecular variability and subtype-specific peculiarities of drug targets in non-subtype B HIV-1 infection. We sequenced and analyzed 35 reverse transcriptase (RT) and 43 protease (PR) sequences from 50 therapy-naive HIV-1-infected Nigerians. Phylogenetic analyses of RT revealed that the predominant viruses were CRF02_AG (57%), subtype G (26%), and CRF06_cpx (11%). Six of 35 (17%) individuals harbored primary mutations for RT inhibitors, including M41L, V118I, Y188H, P236L, and Y318F, and curiously three of the six were infected with CRF06_cpx. Therefore, CRF06_cpx drug-naive individuals had significantly more drug resistance mutations than the other subtypes (p = 0.011). By combining data on quasisynonymous codon bias with the influence of the differential genetic cost of mutations, we were able to predict some mutations, which are likely to predominate by subtype, under drug pressure. Some subtype-specific polymorphisms occurred within epitopes for HLA B7 and B35 in the RT, and HLA A2 and A*6802 in PR, at positions implicated in immune evasion. Balanced polymorphism was also observed at predicted serine-threonine phosphorylation sites in the RT of subtype G viruses. The subtype-specific codon usage and polymorphisms observed suggest the involvement of differential pathways for drug resistance and host-driven viral evolution in HIV-1 CRF02_AG, subtype G, and CRF06_cpx, compared to subtype B. Subtype-specific responses to HIV therapy may have significant consequences for efforts to provide effective therapy to the populations infected with these HIV-1 subtypes.

Investigation of Baseline Susceptibility to Protease Inhibitors in HIV-1 Subtypes C, F, G and Crf02_Ag

Objective

To compare baseline susceptibility to protease inhibitors among HIV-1 isolates of subtypes C, F, G and CRF02_AG, and to identify polymorphisms that determine the differences in susceptibility.

Methods

A total of 42 samples of drug-naive patients infected with subtypes G ( n=19), CRF02_AG ( n=10), F ( n=6) and C ( n=7) were phenotyped and genotyped with the Antivirogram and the ViroSeq 2.0 genotyping system, respectively. A Bayesian network approach was used for a preliminary analysis of the collected data and the dependencies indicated by the network were statistically confirmed.

Results

CRF02_AG samples were found to be more susceptible to nelfinavir and ritonavir than other subtypes. Hypersusceptibility to these drugs was associated with the 70R polymorphism. 37D/S/T was associated with reduced susceptibility to indinavir and 89M with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir. Susceptibility to tipranavir was the lowest among the subtype F samples and the highest for subtype G samples, with samples carrying 57R being more susceptible than samples carrying 57K.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that there are baseline susceptibility differences between subtypes and these differences are due to naturally occurring polymorphisms in these subtypes. The predictive value for phenotype of these polymorphisms was even valid in subtypes where these polymorphisms are less prevalent. Taking into account such polymorphisms should improve current algorithms for interpretation of genotyping results in a subtype-independent way.

Genotypic drug resistance interpretation algorithms display high levels of discordance when applied to non-B strains from HIV-1 naive and treated patients

Genotypic drug resistance interpretation algorithms have been developed on patients infected with HIV-1 subtype B to interpret complex patterns of mutations. As non-B strains are characterised by the natural presence of several resistance-related mutations, we examined to what extent this might result in interalgorithm discordances in naive and treated patients. We compared the prediction by three algorithms (ANRS, Stanford and Rega) of drug susceptibilities to diverse HIV-1 strains from 272 naive and 156 treated patients. In naive patients, higher levels of interalgorithm discordance were observed for predictions of protease inhibitor (0.60-39%) than for predictions of reverse transcriptase inhibitor susceptibility (0-4%). The main reason for discordant protease inhibitor interpretation was the presence of resistance mutations that were natural protease polymorphisms. In contrast, in the treated patients, more interalgorithm discordances were observed for predictions of reverse transcriptase inhibitor (5-48%) than protease inhibitor susceptibilities (10-31%). Discordances were related to disagreement between the intermediate and susceptible scores, the intermediate and resistant scores and the interpretations of complex mutation patterns, related to cross-resistance and antagonistic interactions.

Susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs of CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG, and subtype C viruses from untreated patients of Africa and Asia: comparative genotypic and phenotypic data

Non-B HIV-1 viruses are predominant in developing countries where access to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) is progressively being intensified. It is important to obtain more data on the susceptibility of these viruses to available ARVs. CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG, and subtype C strains of HIV-1 obtained from untreated patients from Vietnam, Cote d'Ivoire, and India were analyzed for their in vitro susceptibility to NRTIs, NNRTIs, PIs, and an entry inhibitor (T-20) using a recombinant viral assay (PHENOSCRIPT). The corresponding viruses, which had been previously sequenced in reverse transcriptase (RT), protease (prot), plus envelope (env) C2/V3 genes and had therefore been fully characterized, were further sequenced in env HR1 + HR2 regions. CRF01_AE isolates are sensitive to NRTIs and NNRTIs with the exception of one isolate that exhibits a decreased susceptibility to NNRTIs associated with a I135T substitution in RT. CRF02_AG and subtype C viruses are sensitive to NRTIs and NNRTIs but some CRF02_AG isolates tend to be resistant to abacavir, potentially related to associated substitutions of RT at positions 123 (D123N) plus 135 (I135V). Whereas all but one CRF01_AE isolates are fully susceptible to PIs, some CRF02_AG and, more frequently, some subtype C isolates are resistant to atazanavir. The role of substitutions in prot at positions of secondary resistance mutations 20, 36, 63, and 82 is raised with a potentially crucial role of the V82I substitution. Finally, all viruses tested, regardless of the CRF or subtype, are fully susceptible to T-20.

Natural polymorphism in protease and reverse transcriptase genes and in vitro antiretroviral drug susceptibilities of non-B HIV-1 strains from treatment-naive patients

BACKGROUND

Most studies on antiretroviral (ARV) resistance of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have been done on subtype B which only represent a limited proportion of infections worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

Understand baseline susceptibilities to ARVs in non-B strains.

METHODS

To explore in greater detail possible intrinsic resistance to antiretroviral drugs in non-B subtypes, phenotypic resistance was tested in 35 non-B (A, D, F, G, J; CRF02, 06, 09, 11, 13) HIV-1 isolates obtained from ARV treatment naive patients. The panel includes strains with an increasing number of minor mutations in the protease gene and/or with atypical mutations at positions associated with resistance in protease and RT.

RESULTS

We detected phenotypic resistance (fold-change values equal or superior to biological test cut-offs (BCO) in 14 of the 35 strains, 4 strains had decreased in vitro susceptibility to more than one drug. However, it is important to note that in most cases the increased fold-changes were close to the BCOs. Phenotypic resistance was observed against each of the three ARV drug classes: ritonavir (n=3), nelfinavir (n=2), saquinavir (n=2), zidovudine (n=2), stavudine (n=1), didanosine (n=1); delavirdine (n=6), efavirenz (n=1) and nevirapine (n=1). Some mutations could be associated with decreased in vitro susceptibility: 1 of 3 strains only with mutations M46I/L in protease, 1/2 A98S, K101N, V108I, V179I, and P236L in reverse transcriptase. Interestingly, the presence of an increasing number of minor mutations in the protease gene was not associated with decreased in vitro susceptibility to protease inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

It is necessary to continue phenotypic studies on non-subtype B strains to identify the role of all polymorphisms present in protease and RT genes and to optimize interpretation algorithms. Data obtained from large, diverse populations of HIV-1 infected individuals is critical for defining and standardizing the quantification of resistance (phenotypic and genotypic testing).

Discordances between interpretation algorithms for genotypic resistance to protease and reverse transcriptase inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus are subtype dependent

The major limitation of drug resistance genotyping for human immunodeficiency virus remains the interpretation of the results. We evaluated the concordance in predicting therapy response between four different interpretation algorithms (Rega 6.3, HIVDB-08/04, ANRS [07/04], and VGI 8.0). Sequences were gathered through a worldwide effort to establish a database of non-B subtype sequences, and demographic and clinical information about the patients was gathered. The most concordant results were found for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (93%), followed by protease inhibitors (84%) and nucleoside RT inhibitor (NRTIs) (76%). For therapy-naive patients, for nelfinavir, especially for subtypes C and G, the discordances were driven mainly by the protease (PRO) mutational pattern 82I/V + 63P + 36I/V for subtype C and 82I + 63P + 36I + 20I for subtype G. Subtype F displayed more discordances for ritonavir in untreated patients due to the combined presence of PRO 20R and 10I/V. In therapy-experienced patients, subtype G displayed a lot of discordances for saquinavir and indinavir due to mutational patterns involving PRO 90 M and 82I. Subtype F had more discordance for nelfinavir attributable to the presence of PRO 88S and 82A + 54V. For the NRTIs lamivudine and emtricitabine, CRF01_AE had more discordances than subtype B due to the presence of RT mutational patterns 65R + 115 M and 118I + 215Y, respectively. Overall, the different algorithms agreed well on the level of resistance scored, but some of the discordances could be attributed to specific (subtype-dependent) combinations of mutations. It is not yet known whether therapy response is subtype dependent, but the advice given to clinicians based on a genotypic interpretation algorithm differs according to the subtype.

Antiviral efficacy and resistance in patients on antiretroviral therapy in Kigali, Rwanda: the real-life situation in 2002

Our study aimed to complete the published data on ARV therapy in Africa by describing the baseline situation in Rwanda before the launch of a large ARV programme (ESTHER). Prescription habits, frequency and reasons for treatment interruptions but also antiviral efficay, resistance to ARVs and genotypic variability of the viruses present in Rwanda were analysed. Among the 233 patients included in the study, it appeared that a vast majority (91%) were under triple therapy and that half of them had experienced at least one treatment interruption caused mainly by drug shortage or financial difficulties. Among 60 blood samples analysed, 26 were in virological failure with a viral load above 1000 RNA copies/ml and 11 presented major drug resistance mutations. Finally, virological failure could mainly be explained by the high frequency of treatment interruptions but also by the emergence of drug resistance mutations. Consequently the major objective for the ESTHER programme to improve the situation in Rwanda will be to reduce the drug shortage and facilitate the financial accessibility of the treatments.

K65R and Y181C are less prevalent in HAART-experienced HIV-1 subtype A patients

The vast majority of HIV-1 infections globally are caused by subtype A or C, although little is known about their drug resistance profiles. We found that HAART-experienced patients infected with subtype A had a lower prevalence of K65R and Y181C than those with subtypes B or C, despite similar exposure to antiretroviral agents that select for these mutations. If confirmed, this information may be important in the planning of antiretroviral regimens in patients infected with HIV-1 subtype A.

High sequence conservation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase under drug pressure despite the continuous appearance of mutations

To define the extent of sequence conservation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase (RT) in vivo, the first 320 amino acids of RT obtained from 2,236 plasma-derived samples from a well-defined cohort of 1,704 HIV-1-infected individuals (457 drug naïve and 1,247 drug treated) were analyzed and examined in structural terms. In naïve patients, 233 out of these 320 residues (73%) were conserved (<1% variability). The majority of invariant amino acids clustered into defined regions comprising between 5 and 29 consecutive residues. Of the nine longest invariant regions identified, some contained residues and domains critical for enzyme stability and function. In patients treated with RT inhibitors, despite profound drug pressure and the appearance of mutations primarily associated with resistance, 202 amino acids (63%) remained highly conserved and appeared mostly distributed in regions of variable length. This finding suggests that participation of consecutive residues in structural domains is strictly required for cooperative functions and sustainability of HIV-1 RT activity. Besides confirming the conservation of amino acids that are already known to be important for catalytic activity, stability of the heterodimer interface, and/or primer/template binding, the other 62 new invariable residues are now identified and mapped onto the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme. This new knowledge could be of help in the structure-based design of novel resistance-evading drugs.

Increased risk of early virological failure in non-European HIV-1-infected patients in a Dutch cohort on highly active antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare early and late responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in European and non-European HIV-1 infected patients in a Dutch cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the response to HAART of 216 previously treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients using the University Medical Centre Utrecht HIV database. African (n=51), Asian (n=7), and Central/South American (n=6) patients were classified as non-European, and others as European (n=152). Early failure was defined as a viral load that remained above 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL after 6 months of treatment with HAART. Late-phase failure was determined in patients who were successfully treated in the early phase and was defined as two consecutive viral load measurements above 400 copies/mL, a new AIDS-defining event or death.

RESULTS

In the early phase, four of 152 (2.6%) European and eight of 64 (12.5%) non-European patients failed HAART. A significant increased risk of virological failure in the early phase of treatment was observed for non-Europeans as compared to Europeans (odds ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.1-20.2). Low serum drug levels in the absence of resistant virus were often seen at the time of early failure. No difference in late-phase failure was observed between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.6; 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-European patients had a 4.6 times higher risk of virological failure than their European counterparts in the first 6 months of treatment with HAART. This failure seemed to be associated with low serum drug levels at the time of failure. However, if HAART was successful in the early phase, response rates in the late phase were similar for Europeans and non-Europeans.

Distinct Patterns of Emergence and Fading of K103N and Y181C in Women With Subtype A vs. D After Single-Dose Nevirapine

BACKGROUND

The HIVNET 012 trial in Uganda demonstrated that single-dose nevirapine (NVP) can prevent HIV-1 mother-to-child transmission. NVP resistance (NVPR) mutations were detected in 25% of women 6 to 8 weeks after NVP, with a higher rate of NVPR in women with subtype D than A. This study examined emergence and fading of specific NVPR mutations in women with these subtypes.

METHODS

Plasma HIV-1 was analyzed with the ViroSeq genotyping system (Celera Diagnostics, Alameda, CA). Genotypes were obtained from paired samples collected 7 days and 6 to 8 weeks after NVP from 140 women, 83 with subtype A and 57 with subtype D.

RESULTS

The rate of NVPR was similar in women with subtype A vs. D at 7 days but was higher in subtype D than A at 6 to 8 weeks. The higher rate of NVPR in subtype D was explained by at least 2 factors: Y181C faded from detection at a greater rate in women with subtype A (odds ratio = 3.06; 95% CI, 1.04, 8.90) and K103N accumulated at a greater rate in women with subtype D (odds ratio = 1.74; 95% CI, 0.62, 4.87).

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-1 subtype influences selection and fading of HIV-1 variants with specific drug resistance mutations after antiretroviral drug exposure.

HIV‐1 Proteases from Drug‐Naive West African Patients Are Differentially Less Susceptible to Protease Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Now that highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is being initiated on a large scale in West Africa, it remains controversial whether protease inhibitors (PIs), originally designed and tested against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtype B, are equally effective against the non-B subtypes that are prevalent in West African countries. In this study, we investigated whether Ghanaian HIV-1 isolates, as representatives of West African isolates, are susceptible to PIs.

METHODS

We first generated an HIV-1 protease cassette vector proviral DNA carrying a luciferase gene, which allows patient-derived HIV-1 proteases to be inserted and to be subjected to both genotypic and phenotypic assays. HIV-1 protease genes derived from 39 treatment-naive Ghanaian patients were used in this experiment as representatives of West African strains. The cloned patient-derived HIV-1 protease genes were first sequenced and then genetically compared. Phenotypic analysis was performed with Ghanaian HIV-1 protease-chimeric viruses in the presence of 6 different PIs. Structural models of HIV-1 protease homodimers were constructed by the molecular modeling software.

RESULTS

Genetic analysis of cloned patient-derived HIV-1 protease genes indicated that most of the Ghanaian HIV-1 proteases are placed as subtype CRF02_AG strains, which are phylogenetically distant from subtype B strains, and that Ghanaian HIV-1 proteases do not harbor known major mutations influencing drug resistance but commonly carry 2-3 minor mutations. Phenotypic analysis performed with HIV-1 protease-recombinant viruses in the presence of 6 different PIs revealed that Ghanaian HIV-1 proteases are differentially less susceptible to the PIs. In support of this finding of differential susceptibility, structural analysis showed a significant distortion of nelfinavir, but not of amprenavir, in the Ghanaian protease pocket, suggesting nelfinavir might be less insertable into the Ghanaian protease than into the protease of subtype B.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide implications for the combination of PIs during the introduction of HAART into West Africa.

Impact of frequent natural polymorphisms at the protease gene on the in vitro susceptibility to protease inhibitors in HIV-1 non-B subtypes

BACKGROUND

Naturally-occurring polymorphisms at the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease which have been associated to resistance to protease inhibitors (PIs) in clade B viruses are frequently found in non-B subtypes, with unknown clinical significance.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the susceptibility of non-B viruses to different PIs.

STUDY DESIGN

Plasma samples from 58 drug-naive individuals infected with HIV-1 non-B subtypes (2A, 22C, 2D, 1F, 29G and 2J) defined by phylogenetic analyses of the protease gene were tested using a phenotypic assay (PhenoSense, ViroLogic, South San Francisco, CA, USA). Twenty of them were further analyzed with another assay (Antivirogram, Virco, Mechelen, Belgium). All 58 non-B viruses harbored amino acid substitutions associated with reduced PI susceptibility in clade B (positions 10, 20, 36, 63, 70, 77 and 82).

RESULTS

Using PhenoSense-HIV assay, all but two individuals harbored viruses completely susceptible to all six PIs tested (indinavir (IDV), ritonavir (RTV), saquinavir (SQV), nelfinavir (NFV), amprenavir (APV), lopinavir (LPV)). The two viruses with reduced susceptibility belonged to clade G. The first virus, which had K20I, M36I and V82I, showed 2.9-fold decreased susceptibility to APV, while the second virus showed 3.9-fold decreased susceptibility to both NFV and RTV, with amino acid substitutions K20I, M36I, L63P and V82I. Of note, several other viruses displayed the same constellation of mutations but without showing any reduced susceptibility, suggesting that these polymorphisms per se do not affect PI susceptibility.

CONCLUSION

PI susceptibility in HIV-1 non-B viruses seems to be preserved despite the presence of polymorphic changes which have been associated to PI resistance in clade B viruses.

Nucleotide and amino acid polymorphisms at drug resistance sites in non-B-subtype variants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

We have compared nucleotide substitutions and polymorphisms at codons known to confer drug resistance in subtype B strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with similar substitutions in viruses of other subtypes. Genotypic analysis was performed on viruses from untreated individuals. Nucleotide and amino acid diversity at resistance sites was compared with a consensus subtype B reference virus. Among patients with non-subtype B infections, polymorphisms relative to subtype B were observed at codon 10 in protease (PR). These included silent substitutions (CTC-->CTT, CTA, TTA) and an amino acid mutation, L10I. Subtype A viruses possessed a V179I substitution in reverse transcriptase (RT). Subtype G viruses were identified by silent substitutions at codon 181 in RT (TAT-->TAC). Similarly, subtype A/G viruses were identified by a substitution at position 67 in RT (GAC-->GAT). Subtype C was distinguished by silent substitutions at codons 106 (GTA-->GTG) and 219 (AAA-->AAG) in RT and codon 48 (GGG-->GGA) in PR. Variations relative to subtype B were seen at RT position 215 (ACC-->ACT) for subtypes A and A/E. These substitutions and polymorphisms reflect different patterns of codon usage among viruses of different subtypes. However, the existence of different subtypes may only rarely affect patterns of drug resistance-associated mutations.

Identification of the minimal conserved structure of HIV-1 protease in the presence and absence of drug pressure

OBJECTIVE

To define the extent of amino acid protease (PR) conservation in vivo in the absence and presence of pharmacological pressure in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

Plasma-derived complete protein PR sequences from a well-defined cohort of 1096 HIV-1 infected individuals (457 drug-naive and 639 under antiretroviral therapy including PR-inhibitors) were obtained and analysed, and are discussed in a structural context.

RESULTS

In naive patients, the PR sequence showed conservation (< 1% variability) in 68 out of 99 (69%) residues. Five large conserved regions were observed, one (P1-P9) at the N-terminal site, another (E21-V32) comprised the catalytic active-site, a third (P44-V56) contained the flap, a fourth contained the region G78-N88, and another (G94-F99) contained the C-terminal site. In PR-inhibitor treated patients, the appearance of mutations primarily associated with drug resistance determined a decrease of amino acid invariance to 45 out of 99 residues (45% conservation). The overall degree of enzyme conservation, when compared to the PR sequences in drug-naive patients, was preserved at the N- and C-terminal regions, whereas the other large conserved areas decreased to smaller domains containing, respectively, the active-site residues D25-D29, the tip of the flap G49-G52, and the G78-P81 and G86-R87 turns.

CONCLUSIONS

Amino acid conservation in HIV PR can be minimally present in 45 residues out of 99. Identification of these invariable residues, with crucial roles in dimer stability, protein flexibility and catalytic activity, and their mapping on the three-dimensional structure of the enzyme will help guide the design of novel resistance-evading drugs.

The evolution of HIV and its consequences

Since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic in 1981, HIV-1 has demonstrated an amazing ability to mutate. HIV-1 was introduced into the human population in the early to mid twentieth century in central Africa. During ensuing decades, this extraordinary mutational capacity has resulted in the circulation of HIV-1 strains that are quite different from one another, yet still remarkably pathogenic. The potential impact of this viral diversity on treatment, monitoring,and vaccine development is discussed.

Genetic variation at NNRTI resistance-associated positions in patients infected with HIV-1 subtype C

OBJECTIVE

Genetic differences between subtypes of HIV-1, even when not associated with key resistance mutations, are known to affect baseline susceptibility to specific antiretroviral drugs and resistance-development pathways. We studied the prevalence and patterns of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-associated mutations in HIV-1 subtype C-infected patients.

METHOD

We analysed the genetic variation at sites associated with NNRTI and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in subtype C- versus B-infected patients, both drug-naive and -experienced. We extended the comparison to subtype B records from the Stanford database.

RESULTS

A total of 150 subtype B and 341 subtype C-infected patients were studied. No significant differences were found in treatment and clinical parameters between the groups. In NNRTI-naive patients, changes in NNRTI positions were present in 9.3% of subtype B- versus 33.1% of subtype C-infected patients (P < 0.001). Differences were seen in both drug-naive (subtype B, 10.0% versus subtype C, 50.1%; P < 0.021) and drug-experienced NNRTI-naive patients (subtype B, 9.0% versus subtype C, 23.8%; P < 0.001). In NNRTI experienced patients, the number of A98G/S changes was significantly higher in subtype C patients treated with either efavirenz or nevirapine (P < 0.0001), and V106M was higher in efavirenz-treated subtype C-infected patients (P < 0.0001). The average mutation rates were 1.26 and 1.67 per patient for subtypes B and C, respectively (P = 0.036). The frequency of nucleoside associated mutations, but not M184V, in treated patients was significantly higher in subgroup B-infected patients (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these data indicate that genetic variation at NNRTI resistance-associated positions such as V106M and A98S is substantially greater in subtype C-infected patients than in subtype B-infected patients. The natural structure of each subtype probably affects the frequency and pattern of drug resistance mutations selected under treatment.

Comparison of Drug Resistance Mutations and Their Interpretation in Patients Infected With Non-B HIV-1 Variants and Matched Patients Infected With HIV-1 Subtype B

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prevalence of mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs and their interpretation in patients infected with non-B HIV-1 variants versus HIV-1subtype B-infected patients with similar treatment regimens.

METHODS

The reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease genes of HIV-1 were sequenced, and subtypes were determined by phylogenetic analysis. Each sequence belonging to a non-B variant was matched with a sequence belonging to subtype B. Patterns of resistance mutations were interpreted in terms of drug resistance using the HIV db algorithm.

RESULTS

RT mutations M41L, L210W, and, to a lesser extent, T215Y were less prevalent in patients infected with non-B variants. This lower prevalence was associated with subtypes A (A1/A2), C, F (F1/F2), and CRF06_cpx. A lower prevalence of high-level resistance to zidovudine was also observed in patients infected with these HIV-1 variants. In the protease gene, differences between patients infected with B or non-B strains were mainly observed for mutations playing a minor role in drug resistance and known to occur mainly as a natural polymorphism in non-B strains: K20R/M/I, M36I, L63P, A71V/T, and V77I. Interpretation of genotypes using the HIV db algorithm indicated that resistance to saquinavir, ritonavir, indinavir, and amprenavir was more frequently a high-level resistance for subtype B and an intermediate-level resistance for non-B variants, but this difference was only significant for amprenavir.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the genetic diversity of HIV-1 does not play a major role in the development of resistance to antiretroviral drugs.

Effects of potent antiretroviral therapy on the immune activation marker soluble CD27 in patients infected with HIV-1 subtypes A-D

HIV-1 genetic subtypes might have a different impact on disease progression and response to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Few data are available on the immune activation profile in patients with different HIV-1 subtypes. We have tested by ELISA the plasma levels of an immune activation marker, soluble CD27 (sCD27), in a cohort of 64 patients infected with HIV-1 subtypes A-D, at baseline and after 1 year of virologically successful ART. Plasma sCD27 was significantly higher in the whole HIV-1-infected population as compared to healthy subjects [522 U/ml (188-1,307) vs. 285 U/ml (174-397), P < 0.001]. Among the four different HIV-1 subtypes, patients with subtype C virus had significantly higher plasma sCD27 [684 U/ml, (188-1228)] as compared to patients with subtype A [428 U/ml (247-1307), P < 0.05] and B [454 (211-925), P < 0.05]. After 1 year of ART, plasma sCD27 significantly decreased in all groups but patients with subtype C viruses had the largest reduction of sCD27 from baseline. The data indicate that a similar immune activation profile is present in patients infected with HIV-1 subtypes A, B, and D and that in presence of successful ART these subtypes respond similarly in terms of immune activation. Intriguingly, subtype C infection seems to be associated with higher levels of plasma sCD27, suggesting that HIV-1 genetic subtype C may have a different impact on disease outcome and response to therapy.

HIV type 1 pol gene diversity and archived nevirapine resistance mutation in pregnant women in Rwanda

This study aimed to find out whether genetic polymorphisms were present in positions potentially affecting susceptibility to antiretrovirals in non-B subtypes from HIV-1-infected patients in Rwanda. Viral pol gene diversity was investigated by direct sequencing in 43 treatment-naive women. In addition, 10 DNA sequences from uncultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed 6 weeks after a single dose of nevirapine (prevention of mother-to-child transmission program). Phylogenetic analyses have shown 34 subtype A1, 6 subtype C, and 2 subtype D strains. In addition, an A/C recombinant between the protease (PR) (subtype A1) and the reverse transcriptase (RT) (subtype C) was identified. In the PR coding region, high numbers of polymorphisms were found, including substitutions in secondary PR resistance sites. PR 35D, 36I, and 37N were always present within subtype A as were PR 93L in subtype C strains. PR 10I/V, 20R, 33F, and 77V were found in subtype A whereas PR 36I was highly prevalent in subtype C strains. The A/C recombinant displayed substitutions related to resistance (PR 10, 33, 36 and RT 118). One nevirapine resistance mutation (RT 181Y/C) was found in proviral DNA after 6 weeks. In conclusion, subtypes A and C are predominant in this cohort in Rwanda. Substitutions similar to secondary protease inhibitor resistance mutations are common before treatment whereas major resistance mutation may be archived after a single dose of nevirapine. Accordingly, the hypothesis of a genetic background effect in non-B strains has to be further addressed in programs of introduction of antivirals in Africa.

Drug resistance in non-subtype B HIV-1

Treatment of HIV-1 with antiretroviral therapy may select mutations in the pol gene associated with resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. To provide durable clinical benefit, emergence of drug resistance is countered by prescription of alternative drug regimens. Data on sequential treatments that are effective after virologic failure and the selection of drug resistance is largely confined to HIV-1 subtype B, the clade that has circulated in North America and Europe. However, HIV-1 subtype B currently accounts for only 12% of the estimated 40 million HIV infected individuals worldwide. The global HIV-1 epidemic includes infection with nine identified HIV-1 group M subtypes (A-K), as well as distinct sub-subtypes and numerous chimerical or recombinant forms. Increasing access to treatment of HIV-1 in the developing world and increasing non-subtype B infection through travel and migration pose new questions about the susceptibility and response of these diverse HIV-1 viruses to antiretroviral drugs. Here we review HIV diversity and the published literature on drug resistance, comparing the known resistance mutations in individuals infected with subtype B to the growing experience in the treatment of non-subtype B HIV-1 worldwide.

HIV/AIDS in Central Africa: pathogenesis, immunological and medical issues

The estimated worldwide prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections topped 52.5 million in June 2003, a mere 20 years after the aetiological agent was shown to be a sexually transmissible virus with a predilection for CD4+ T lymphocytes. More than 22 million people have died of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and the condition has in one generation become the most devastating and persistent epidemics in recorded history. More than two thirds of the world total of HIV-infected people live in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Central and Southern Africa at least 20% of the adult population is infected. As these adults die, they leave increasing numbers of orphans. Life expectancy at birth declined by 10 years per decade since the late 1980s to 50 years in the late 1990s, and in Botswana it is estimated to be as low as 33 years by 2010. The epidemic is increasing unabated and prospects for a curative or protective vaccine remain remote. The impact on HIV in Africa has been so profound that it influences political, economic, agriculture/food security, social, education, defence, science and health considerations. The medical and in particular immunology communities in Central Africa have the invidious challenge of on the one hand diagnosing the condition, monitoring its impact and contributing to treatment and management efforts. The science and clinical practice of immunology is challenged to find answers to the epidemic, perhaps including a vaccine. In this review we address the peculiarities of the HIV epidemic in Africa, its epidemiology and immunopathogenesis. We address the effect of the epidemic on individual patients, in their homes, workplaces and the knock-on effects on families and friends of the infected. Respective specialists discuss special groups (women, children) that are predominantly seen in Africa. We also discuss the impact of the epidemic on the clinical practice of medicine in general and challenges faced in the introduction of antiretroviral medicines. We also discuss options available for the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of HIV-infected patients in this region.

Stable prevalence of genotypic drug resistance mutations but increase in non-B virus among patients with primary HIV-1 infection in France

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of drug-resistant HIV-1 viral strains from patients presenting with primary infection in 1999-2000 and to survey the molecular epidemiology of these viruses circulating in France.

METHODS

Resistance mutations were detected by sequencing the reverse transcriptase and the protease genes in plasma samples from 249 individuals. Phylogenetic analysis was performed on the reverse transcriptase genes.

RESULTS

Ten per cent of patients [26/249; 95% confidence interval (CI) 7-15%] presented with virus mutations associated with resistance to at least one antiretroviral drug. The distribution of the resistance mutations was as follows: to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 19 (8%; 95% CI 5-12%) and to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in 10 (4%; 95% CI 2-7%). Primary resistance mutations to protease inhibitors were detected in 14 (6%; 95% CI 3-9%). Twelve patients (5%; 95% CI 3-8%) presented with virus harbouring mutations associated with resistance to two or three classes of antiretroviral drugs. The median HIV RNA in plasma at enrollment was lower in patients with one or more drug resistance mutations than in patients with no mutations (5.05 log versus 5.47 log, P = 0.05). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 19% (14-24%) of patients harboured HIV-1 non-B subtype strains; this proportion remained high when Caucasian patients only were considered (14%).

CONCLUSION

This study, performed within the French network on HIV-1 primary infection survey, revealed no change in the frequency of resistant viral strains over time, but showed an increasing prevalence of non-B subtypes overall and among Caucasian individuals.

Patterns of point mutations associated with antiretroviral drug treatment failure in CRF01_AE (subtype E) infection differ from subtype B infection

An increasing number of HIV-1-infected patients living in developing countries now have access to antiretroviral drugs. Information regarding the drug-resistant mutations of non-B subtype HIV-1 remains limited, however. The authors cross-sectionally compared patterns of the drug-resistant point mutations in patients infected with either subtype B or CRF01_AE (subtype E) among patients who acquired HIV by sexual transmission in Japan. Protease sequence data were available from 216 patients with a detectable level of RNA copies in plasma. Based on phylogenetic analysis of the protease and the C2V3 regions, 162 subtype B and 45 CRF01_AE cases were identified; 82 subtype B and 24 CRF01_AE patients had a treatment failure with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; and 69 subtype B and 19 CRF01_AE patients had a treatment failure with a protease inhibitor. Antiretroviral drug history was similar in subtype B-infected and CRF01_AE-infected patients. The mutations T69N and V75M in reverse transcriptase and L10F, K20I, L33I, and N88S in protease were seen more frequently in patients infected with CRF01_AE than in patients with subtype B. The mutations, D30N, A71V, and N88D were found exclusively in patients with subtype B. Most of the characteristic mutation patterns were associated with a history of receiving nelfinavir. The pattern of drug resistance mutations differs between the subtypes. Data derived from subtype B drug-resistant genotypes may not always be applicable to non-B subtypes.