A model of a nucleus 24 cochlear implant fitting protocol based on the electrically evoked whole nerve action potential

Remote Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry: Technique and Results in Cochlear Implant Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Present results with remote intraoperative neural response telemetry (NRT) during cochlear implantation (CI) and its usefulness in overcoming the inefficiency of in person NRT.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Tertiary academic otology practice.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing primary or revision CI, both adult and pediatric, were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Remote intraoperative NRT performed by audiologists using a desktop computer to control a laptop in the operating room. Testing was performed over the hospital network using commercially available software. A single system was used to test all three FDA-approved manufacturers' devices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Success rate and time savings of remote NRT.

RESULTS

Out of 254 procedures, 252 (99.2%) underwent successful remote NRT. In two procedures (0.7%), remote testing was unsuccessful, and required in-person testing to address technical issues.Both failed attempts were due to hardware failure (OR laptop or headpiece problems). There was no relation between success of the procedure and patient/surgical factors such as difficult anatomy, or the approach used for inner ear access. The audiologist time saved using this approach was considerable when compared with in-person testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Remote intraoperative NRT testing during cochlear implantation can be performed effectively using standard hardware and remote-control software. Especially important during the Covid-19 pandemic, such a procedure can reduce in-person contacts, and limit the number of individuals in the operating room. Remote testing can provide additional flexibility and efficiency in audiologist schedules.

Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults Using Bimodal Hearing Configurations

Clinics are treating a growing number of patients with greater amounts of residual hearing. These patients often benefit from a bimodal hearing configuration in which acoustic input from a hearing aid on 1 ear is combined with electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant on the other ear. The current guidelines aim to review the literature and provide best practice recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of individuals with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who may benefit from bimodal hearing configurations. Specifically, the guidelines review: benefits of bimodal listening, preoperative and postoperative cochlear implant evaluation and programming, bimodal hearing aid fitting, contralateral routing of signal considerations, bimodal treatment for tinnitus, and aural rehabilitation recommendations.

Mapping Cochlear Duct Length to Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials in Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Objective measurements may assist in indicating cochlear implants and in predicting outcomes of cochlear implantation surgery. Using electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP), information about the function of the auditory nerve can be obtained by analyzing responses to electrical stimulation transmitted and derived by the recording electrode. The aim of this study was to determine whether ECAP characteristics differ depending on the stimulated intracochlear region and the size of the cochlea.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University Medical center, tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery between 2015 and 2018.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation with FLEXsoft electrode arrays (length 31.5 mm, 12 stimulating channels).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The cochlear duct length (CDL) and the cochlear coverage (CC) were measured using a new computed tomography-based software and correlated to the postoperative speech performance. Additionally, ECAP were measured and associated to the CDL.

RESULTS

A total of 59 ears of 53 cochlear implant users with a mean age of 63.6 (SD 14.9) years were included. The mean estimated CDL was 35.0 (SD 2.2) mm. The mean CC was 90.3% (SD 5.5%). A total of 4,873 ECAP were measured. A statistically significant, moderate, negative correlation between the ECAP slope and the site of stimulation was found (r = -0.29, 95% confidence interval: -0.32 to -0.27, p < 0.0001). No correlation between the CC and the speech performance was found (r = -0.08, 95% confidence interval: -0.33 to 0.18 p = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

ECAP slopes seem to be a reliable tool to identify the electrode's position inside the cochlea and also showed correlations to the anatomy of the patient. A combination of objective measurements such as anatomical parameters and ECAPs are helpful to assist the postoperative fitting and are promising tools to improve patient care.

The Precision of eCAP Thresholds Derived From Amplitude Growth Functions

OBJECTIVE

An amplitude growth function (AGF) shows the amplitude of an electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) as a function of the stimulation current. AGFs can be used to derive the eCAP threshold, which represents the minimum amount of current needed to elicit a measurable eCAP. eCAP thresholds have been widely used clinically to, for example, assist with sound processor programming. However, no eCAP precision has been included to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the precision of eCAP thresholds and determine whether they are precise enough for clinical use.

DESIGN

The study is retrospective, and the data comprised 826 AGFs, intraoperatively measured in 111 patients implanted with a HiRes90K cochlear implant (Advanced Bionics). For each AGF, the eCAP threshold was determined using two commonly used methods: linear extrapolation (LE) toward the x axis and detection of the last visible (LV) eCAP. Subsequently, the threshold confidence interval (TCI) of each eCAP threshold was calculated to serve as a metric for precision, whereby a larger TCI means a lower precision or reliability. Additionally, the eCAP thresholds results were compared with most recent behavioral fitting thresholds (T profile) to put the eCAP threshold analysis in clinical context. Thereby, the association between eCAP and behavioral thresholds was calculated, both for all subjects together (group analysis) and, in contrast to previous studies, within individual subjects.

RESULTS

Our data show that the TCIs were larger with the LE method than with the LV method. The eCAP thresholds estimated by the LE method were systematically smaller than those estimated by the LV method, while the LE thresholds with the smallest TCIs correlated best with the LV thresholds. Correlation analysis between eCAP and behavioral thresholds revealed correlation coefficients of r = 0.44 and r = 0.54 for the group analysis of LE and LV thresholds, respectively. Within individual subjects, however, the correlation coefficients varied from approximately -1 to +1 for both LE and LV thresholds. Further analysis showed that across subjects, the behavioral thresholds fell within the TCIs of the eCAP threshold profiles.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that eCAP thresholds have an uncertainty that can be estimated using TCIs. The size of the TCI depends on several factors, for example, the threshold estimation method and measurement conditions, but it is often larger than one would expect when just looking at the threshold values. Given these large TCIs, future research on eCAP thresholds should be accompanied by a measure of precision to correctly apply eCAP thresholds in clinical practice. Comparing our eCAP threshold results with T profiles indicates that the eCAP thresholds are possibly not precise enough to predict T profiles.

Stimulation parameters differ between current anti-modiolar and peri-modiolar electrode arrays implanted within the same child

OBJECTIVE

To compare stimulation parameters of peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar electrode arrays using two surgical approaches.

METHODS

Impedance, stimulation thresholds, comfortably loud current levels, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds were compared between 2 arrays implanted in the same child at 5 time points: surgery, activation/day 1, week 1, and months 1 and 3. The peri-modiolar array was implanted via cochleostomy in all children (n = 64), while the anti-modiolar array was inserted via a cochleostomy in 43 children and via the round window in 21 children.

RESULTS

The anti-modiolar array had significantly lower impedance, but required higher current levels to elicit thresholds, comfort, electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds than the peri-modiolar array across all time points, particularly in basal electrodes (p < 0.05). The prevalence of open electrodes was similar in anti-modiolar (n = 5) and peri-modiolar (n = 3) arrays.

CONCLUSION

Significant but clinically acceptable differences in stimulation parameters between peri-modiolar and anti-modiolar arrays persisted four months after surgery in children using bilateral cochlear implants. The surgical approach used to insert the anti-modiolar array had no overall effect on outcomes.

Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array

Background

The standard electrode array for the MED-EL MAESTRO cochlear implant system is 31 mm in length which allows an insertion angle of approximately 720°. When fully inserted, this long electrode array is capable of stimulating the most apical region of the cochlea. No investigation has explored Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) recordings in this region with a large number of subjects using a commercially available cochlear implant system. The aim of this study is to determine if certain properties of ECAP recordings vary, depending on the stimulation site in the cochlea.

Methods

Recordings of auditory nerve responses were conducted in 67 subjects to demonstrate the feasibility of ECAP recordings using the Auditory Nerve Response Telemetry (ART™) feature of the MED-EL MAESTRO system software. These recordings were then analyzed based on the site of cochlear stimulation defined as basal, middle and apical to determine if the amplitude, threshold and slope of the amplitude growth function and the refractory time differs depending on the region of stimulation.

Results

Findings show significant differences in the ECAP recordings depending on the stimulation site. Comparing the apical with the basal region, on average higher amplitudes, lower thresholds and steeper slopes of the amplitude growth function have been observed. The refractory time shows an overall dependence on cochlear region; however post-hoc tests showed no significant effect between individual regions.

Conclusions

Obtaining ECAP recordings is also possible in the most apical region of the cochlea. However, differences can be observed depending on the region of the cochlea stimulated. Specifically, significant higher ECAP amplitude, lower thresholds and steeper amplitude growth function slopes have been observed in the apical region. These differences could be explained by the location of the stimulating electrode with respect to the neural tissue in the cochlea, a higher density, or an increased neural survival rate of neural tissue in the apex.

Trial registration

The Clinical Investigation has the Competent Authority registration number DE/CA126/AP4/3332/18/05.

Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users

OBJECTIVE

This study had three main goals. The first goal was to assess the extent to which neural adaptation varied across cochlear implant users. The second goal was to determine whether adaptation at the level of the auditory nerve was correlated with word recognition ability. The third goal was to determine whether peripheral neural adaptation had an impact on the relationship between the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and MAP levels.

DESIGN

Neural response telemetry software was used to record the ECAP in 21 Nucleus cochlear implant users. A series of 110 ECAP recordings were made over a 5-min period at three different stimulation rates: 15, 80, and 300 Hz. The stimulation levels used to record this series of responses were held constant at or near the level the subject identified as his or her maximum comfort level (C-level) for the 300-Hz stimulation rate. Consistent decreases in ECAP amplitude as measured from the beginning to the end of the 5-min stimulation interval were interpreted as evidence of neural adaptation. Regression analysis procedures were then used to assess the relationship between neural adaptation and word recognition.

RESULTS

Significant levels of adaptation were observed for all 21 subjects at stimulation rates of 80 and 300 Hz. Little or no adaptation was observed over the 5-min recording period when the 15-Hz rate was used. The amount of adaptation was greatest at the 300-Hz rate and varied substantially across cochlear implant users. No relationship between the amount of adaptation and word recognition was found. Neither was the degree of adaptation shown to influence the relationship between ECAP thresholds recorded at low rates and the levels used to program the speech processor.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implant users experienced varying degrees of long-term adaptation in response to continuous electrical stimulation. The effects of adaptation on the ECAP were apparent even at stimulation rates as low as 80 Hz. Although variations in the amount of adaptation are likely to reflect cross-subject differences in the status of the auditory nerve, no predictable relationship was found between these physiologic measures of peripheral neural function and either word recognition or the relationship between ECAP thresholds and MAP levels.

Advances in cochlear implant telemetry: evoked neural responses, electrical field imaging, and technical integrity

During the last decade, cochlear implantation has evolved into a well-established treatment of deafness, predominantly because of many improvements in speech processing and the controlled excitation of the auditory nerve. Cochlear implants now also feature telemetry, which is highly useful to monitor the proper functioning of the implanted electronics and electrode contacts. Telemetry can also support the clinical management in young children and difficult cases where neural unresponsiveness is suspected. This article will review recent advances in the telemetry of the electrically evoked compound action potential that have made these measurements simple and routine procedures in most cases. The distribution of the electrical stimulus itself sampled by "electrical field imaging" reveals general patterns of current flow in the normal cochlea and gross abnormalities in individual patients; models have been developed to derive more subtle insights from an individual electrical field imaging. Finally, some thoughts are given to the extended application of telemetry, for example, in monitoring the neural responses or in combination with other treatments of the deaf ear.

AutoNRT™: An automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus® Freedom™ cochlear implant via machine intelligence

OBJECTIVE

AutoNRT is an automated system that measures electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds from the auditory nerve with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. ECAP thresholds along the electrode array are useful in objectively fitting cochlear implant systems for individual use. This paper provides the first detailed description of the AutoNRT algorithm and its expert systems, and reports the clinical success of AutoNRT to date.

METHODS

AutoNRT determines thresholds by visual detection, using two decision tree expert systems that automatically recognise ECAPs. The expert systems are guided by a dataset of 5393 neural response measurements. The algorithm approaches threshold from lower stimulus levels, ensuring recipient safety during postoperative measurements. Intraoperative measurements use the same algorithm but proceed faster by beginning at stimulus levels much closer to threshold. When searching for ECAPs, AutoNRT uses a highly specific expert system (specificity of 99% during training, 96% during testing; sensitivity of 91% during training, 89% during testing). Once ECAPs are established, AutoNRT uses an unbiased expert system to determine an accurate threshold. Throughout the execution of the algorithm, recording parameters (such as implant amplifier gain) are automatically optimised when needed.

RESULTS

In a study that included 29 intraoperative and 29 postoperative subjects (a total of 418 electrodes), AutoNRT determined a threshold in 93% of cases where a human expert also determined a threshold. When compared to the median threshold of multiple human observers on 77 randomly selected electrodes, AutoNRT performed as accurately as the 'average' clinician.

CONCLUSIONS

AutoNRT has demonstrated a high success rate and a level of performance that is comparable with human experts. It has been used in many clinics worldwide throughout the clinical trial and commercial launch of Nucleus Custom Sound Suite, significantly streamlining the clinical procedures associated with cochlear implant use.

A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant

CONCLUSIONS

Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values (EIVs) in children using the Clarion cochlear implant (CI) programmed with CIS strategy stabilized after 3 months of implant use. The data presented here may be useful as a general guideline for the programming of infants and young children and may further be of help for the identification of patients who fall outside the "average" range.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changes in electrical stimulation levels, i.e. threshold (T) levels, comfortable (M) levels, dynamic range (DR), and EIVs during the first 18 months of implant use, in children using the Clarion CI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The maps of 18 pre-lingual children (mean age at implantation 4.2 years; range 1-8), using the Enhanced Bipolar 1.2 or Bipolar standard electrode with the S-Series speech processor programmed with CIS strategy, were examined at five time points: connection, and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-initial stimulation. T levels, M levels, DR and EIVs were analyzed according to four cochlear segments: apical, apical-medial, medial-basal, and basal.

RESULTS

During the first 3 months of implant use T levels increased to some extent, whereas M levels and DR increased significantly. From 3 months and through the entire follow-up, T and M levels as well as DR were stable. EIVs of current carrying electrodes decreased significantly from connection to the 3-month visit; thereafter a stabilization of values was evident. Electrical stimulation levels and EIVs did not differ among the cochlear segments during the entire follow-up.

Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implant: a one year follow-up

The present study was designed to follow changes in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values (EIV) in children using the Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implant (CI) during the first 12 months of implant use. The maps of 24 prelingually deaf children implanted at a mean age of 5.9 years (range 1-15.9 years) using the TEMPO+ speech processor programmed with CIS+ strategy were examined at five time points: initial stimulation, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-initial stimulation. Most comfortable levels (M) and electrode impedance values (EIV) were analyzed according to three cochlear segments: apical, medial, and basal. Results indicated a significant increase in M levels until the 3-month time point, thereafter stabilization was evident. Furthermore, M levels in the apical segment were lower than those in the medial and basal segments. EIV decreased from initial stimulation to the 3-month time point and was then stable through the study follow up. Interestingly, the finding of higher EIV in the apical segment may be attributed to the physical characteristics of the Med-El electrode. In conclusion, the pattern of stabilization of M levels found in the present study is similar to that reported for children using other devices. The data presented here may be useful as a guideline for programming M levels and monitoring EIV in infants and young children. They may further help clinicians to identify those children that fall outside the 'typical' range.

Telemetria de resposta neural intra-operatória em usuários de implante coclear

A possibilidade de realizar o implante coclear em crianças pequenas torna necessário o uso de medidas objetivas para auxiliar a programação do processador de fala. Telemetria é a propriedade que permite, no Nucleus 24®, a obtenção do potencial de ação composto evocado do VIII par (EAP) utilizando o implante como instrumento de estimulação e gravação para o estudo das propriedades neurais remanescentes. OBJETIVO: Descrever a utilização do sistema de telemetria para a gravação do EAP, caracterizando as respostas obtidas e a sua prevalência na condição intraoperatória. FORMA DE ESTUDO: clínico com coorte transversal. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Medidas das impedâncias dos eletrodos e do EAP em um grupo de 17 indivíduos usuários do implante Nucleus 24® durante a cirurgia. Análise das respostas de acordo com a etiologia, o tempo de duração da surdez e a posição dos eletrodos dentro da cóclea. RESULTADOS: Maior prevalência nos eletrodos apicais e limiares mais elevados nos casos de meningite e otosclerose. CONCLUSÃO: A telemetria é eficiente para a verificação da integridade dos eletrodos na condição intraoperatória e para a gravação do EAP, apresentando alta prevalência na população estudada.

Neural response telemetry measures in patients implanted with Nucleus 24®

Cochlear implantation has been recommended for children under 24 months of age. The use of objective measures is needed to help speech processor programming. The electrically evoked compound potential (EAP), which can be assessed by neural response telemetry (NRT), is one of those objective measures. Aim: to determine how often the EAP can be recorded by NRT system during surgery and to describe the responses. Study design: clinical with transversal cohort. Material and Method: the impedances and NRT were measured in a group of 17 Nucleus 24^® implant users. The responses were analyzed and compared to the etiology, hearing loss duration and electrode array position. Results: The EAP was easily recorded in the apical electrodes and, in otosclerosis and meningitis cases the EAP threshold was higher than in the other etiology cases. Conclusions: The NRT can be found in 82% of the cases during surgery. The responses obtained may vary according to etiology and the position of electrodes along the cochlea.

Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects

Multielectrode cochlear implants rely on differential stimulation of the cochlear nerve for presenting the brain with the spectral and timing information required to understand speech. In implant patients, the degree of overlap among cochlear nerve fibers stimulated by the different electrodes constitutes the electrode interaction. Electrode interaction degrades the spectral resolution of the implant's stimulus. We sought to define electrode interaction in a cohort of pediatric cochlear implant subjects as a function of both stimulus intensity and electrode location along the array. The 27 pediatric subjects that completed the study were implanted with either the Clarion Hi-Focus array with or without positioner, the Nucleus 24 Contour array, or the Nucleus 24 Straight array. All but two of the patients had congenital hearing loss, and none of the patients had meningitis prior to the onset of deafness. The cochlear nerve response was measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). A forward masking protocol was used such that a probe stimulus electrode remained fixed while a preceding masker was moved across the array. Electrode interaction was estimated by measuring the unmasked probe response minus the masked probe response. Three probe locations and three probe intensities were examined for each subject. At all probe locations, electrode interaction increased as probe intensity increased (p < 0.05). Interaction at the basal probe was less than that at either the middle or apical probe locations (p < 0.05), and significant correlation found between probe distance from the basal end of the array and electrode interaction (p < 0.001). These results demonstrate that in this cohort of pediatric subjects, electrode interaction depended on both stimulus intensity and probe location. Implications of these findings on future implant array design and current implant fitting strategies are discussed. The impact of electrode interaction on implant performance is yet to be elucidated.

Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting

OBJECTIVE

In cochlear implant recipients, the threshold of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) has been shown to correlate with the perceptual detection threshold and maximum comfortable loudness levels (respectively, T- and C-levels) used for implant programming. Our general objective was to model the relationship between ECAP threshold and T/C-levels by taking into account their relative changes within each subject. In particular, we were interested in investigating further the validity of ECAP threshold as a predictor of psychophysical levels, depending on intra-cochlear electrode location and time of testing (from 1 to 18 months post-implantation).

METHODS

A total of 370 ECAP thresholds, measured in 49 children, using a Nucleus 24 cochlear implant, were compared with the corresponding T- and C-levels obtained at the same visit, for the same electrode. Response profiles for the whole group of patients were modeled across four test electrodes spaced equally along the electrode array from base towards apex. A linear regression model was constructed and the quality of the ECAP threshold-based predictions was assessed by testing for correlation between measured and predicted psychophysics. Comparison was made with a more simplistic model (described here as the 'parallel profiles method') stipulating, within each subject, a 1 microA increase in psychophysical levels for every 1 microA increase in ECAP threshold.

RESULTS

Offset between ECAP threshold and psychophysics profiles was found to vary significantly along the electrode array for the T-, but not for the C-level. In contrast with the parallel profiles method, our regression model predicted, within each subject, an average increase of 0.23 microA (95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.28) in T-level for every 1 microA increase in ECAP threshold. This correction improved the quality of T-level prediction when our model was run using measured T-level and ECAP threshold from a reference electrode (r=0.77 vs. r=0.62). The shorter the distance between the electrode for which T-level was predicted and the one used as reference, the stronger the correlation between measured and predicted T-levels. In addition, poorer T-level predictions were obtained at the basal end of the array during the first 3 months post-implantation. In contrast to T-level, individual changes in C-level with ECAP threshold exhibited heterogeneous patterns across subjects so that no common coefficient could account for these changes. However, applying the parallel profiles method led to high-quality C-level prediction.

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The results suggest that covariation between ECAP thresholds and psychophysics plays a decisive role in the relationship of ECAP threshold with T-, but not with C-level. Therefore, our regression model and the parallel profiles method should both be used for predicting, respectively, the T- and the C-levels. Although the predictability of our regression model seems to be better for middle and apical electrodes, its utilization should be extended to basal electrodes after 6 months' implant use.

Toward a Battery of Behavioral and Objective Measures to Achieve Optimal Cochlear Implant Stimulation Levels in Children

OBJECTIVES

Children require audible and comfortable stimulation from their cochlear implants immediately after device activation. To accomplish this, a battery of objective measures may be needed that could include the electrically evoked stapedius reflex (ESR), compound action potential from the auditory nerve (ECAP), and/or auditory brain stem response (EABR). In the present study, the following specific research questions were asked: In children using cochlear implants, 1) Can the ECAP, EABR, and ESR be recorded at the time of cochlear implantation? 2) What is the feasibility of measuring the ECAP, EABR, and the ESR repeatedly without the use of sedation over the first year of implant use? 3) Do ECAP, EABR, and ESR thresholds or behavioral measures change over time? 4) What is the relation between ECAP, EABR, and ESR thresholds and behavioral measures of threshold and comfortably loud levels?

DESIGN

In 68 children, ECAP, EABR, and ESR responses as well as behavioral measures of stimulation threshold and maximum stimulation were recorded at regular intervals over the first year of implant use. In each child, responses were recorded to electrical pulses provided by three different electrodes along the implanted array. Visual inspections of the stapedius reflex (V-ESR) evoked by activation of the same three electrodes at the time of surgery were performed in an additional 20 children.

RESULTS

ECAP and EABR measures were obtained in more than 84% of electrodes tested and 89% of children tested both in the operating room at the time of implant surgery (OR) and after surgery in nonsedated children. ESRs were recorded by using immittance measures in more than 65% of electrodes tested and 67% of children tested by 3 mo of implant use, but this technique was less successful in the OR and during early stages of device use. V-ESRs and ECAP thresholds were higher in the OR than ESRs and ECAPs at postoperative recording times. EABR and ECAP thresholds did not significantly change over the first 6 and 12 mo of implant use, respectively, whereas ESR thresholds increased. Behavioral measures of threshold decreased over time, whereas maximum stimulation levels rose over time. Behavioral measures of threshold and loudness were highly correlated at all test times. ECAP, EABR, and behavioral measures were lower when evoked by an electrode at the apical end of the implanted array than by more basal electrodes. Behavioral thresholds could be predicted mainly by ECAP thresholds, whereas maximum stimulation levels could best be predicted by ESR thresholds; both were significantly affected by the age at implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of nonbehavioral measures can aid in the determination of useful cochlear implant stimulation levels, particularly in young children and infants with limited auditory experience. These measures can be made in the operating room and can be repeated after surgery when needed. Correction factors to predict threshold stimulation levels should be based on ECAP thresholds or EABR thresholds if necessary. Correction factors should be made for at least one apical and mid-array electrode, should take into account the age of the child, and may have to be revised during the first year of implant use. Maximum stimulation levels may be best determined by using the ESR.

NRT-based versus behavioral-based MAP: a comparison of parameters and speech perception in young children

The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of neural response telemetry (NRT)-based cochlear implant (CI) programming versus behavioral-based programming on electrical stimulation parameters (MAP) threshold (T) and comfortable (C) levels and speech perception abilities in young children, during the first year of implant use. Ten congenitally deaf children at the age of 12-39 months (mean age: 25.2 months) implanted with the Nucleus 24R(CS) CI participated in the study. The group was randomly divided into two: (1) NRT-based MAP group (n = 5) consisted of children who were programmed using intra-operative NRT measurements; (2) behavioral-based MAP group (n = 5) consisted of children who were programmed using the behavioral responses of the patients. MAP parameters as well as sound-field aided thresholds and speech perception abilities were compared between the two groups at consecutive programming sessions: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post initial stimulation. Results indicated no significant differences among NRT-based MAPs and behavioral-based MAPs. Although MAP profiles at initial stimulation differed in the apical region, these differences decreased with time. In addition, a gradual increase of T and C levels of NRT-based MAPs as well as those of behavioral-based MAPs was evident until the 1-month time point, thereafter stabilization occurred. Sound-field aided thresholds improved with time for both groups; however, they were found to be significantly better for the NRT-based MAP group. Despite these differences, speech perception abilities were comparable among groups at 12 months post initial stimulation. NRT-based programming was found to be significantly shorter than behavioral-based programming. In conclusion, for this small group of children, our findings support the use of NRT for programming of young children during the initial period after implantation.

Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize current thinking relative to clinical applications for the electrically evoked compound action potential and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response with the focus on works published between 1998 and 2003.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the period of this review, a considerable body of research has been published describing how the electrically evoked compound action potential can be measured and how the electrically evoked compound action potential may be used in the clinical treatment of cochlear implant patients. During this same period, there has been a decline in the number of studies reporting potential clinical applications for the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Perhaps the strongest clinical application for the electrically evoked compound action potential today is as a tool to facilitate the process of fitting the speech processor of the cochlear implant. This is particularly important for pediatric patients who may not be able to be programmed using traditional behavioral techniques. The accuracy of these predictions is discussed in addition to the limitations of the studies reviewed.

SUMMARY

The introduction of cochlear implants with the capability of measuring the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation from an intracochlear electrode has tremendous potential to impact clinical practice. Research into how best to use this information is ongoing.

Changes over time in electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to evaluate changes in psycho-electric parameters, i.e. threshold levels, comfortable levels, dynamic range, and electrode impedance values during the 1st year post-implantation, in children using the Nucleus 24M cochlear implant system.

METHODS

The maps of 25 pre-lingual children programmed with ACE strategy in Monopolar 1 + 2 mode were examined at five time points: connection, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-initial stimulation. Maps and electrode impedance values were analyzed according to three cochlear segments: basal, medial, and apical.

RESULTS

Significant elevations of thresholds, comfortable levels, and dynamic range were found during the first few months of implant use. Specifically, threshold increased and dynamic range widened until the 3 months visit, whereas comfortable levels continued to increase until the 6 months visit, thereafter levels stabilized. Electrode impedance values decreased significantly from connection to the 1-month visit thereafter a stabilization of values was evident. In addition, thresholds and comfortable levels were found to be significantly lower in the apical segment, whereas dynamic range and electrode impedance values did not differ among the cochlear segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant changes in psycho-electric parameters and electrode impedance values were evident during the first 6 months of implant use. Given the important role of an optimal map for speech perception, frequent programming sessions during the first few months of implant use are essential.

EAP recordings in ineraid patients--correlations with psychophysical measures and possible implications for patient fitting

OBJECTIVE

Objective measurements can be helpful for cochlear implant fitting of difficult populations, as for example very young children. One method, the recording of the electrically evoked compound action potential (EAP), measures the nerve recruitment in the cochlea in response to stimulation through the implant. For coding strategies implemented at a moderate stimulation rate of 250 pps per channel, useful correlations between EAP data and psychophysical data have been already found. With new systems running at higher rates, it is important to check these correlations again.

DESIGN

This study investigates the correlations between psychophysical data and EAP measures calculated from EAP amplitude growth functions. EAP data were recorded in 12 Ineraid subjects. Additionally, behavioral thresholds (THR) and maximum acceptable loudness levels (MAL) were determined for stimulation rates of 80 pps and 2,020 pps for each electrode.

RESULTS

Useful correlations between EAP data and psychophysical data were found at the low stimulation rate (80 pps). However, at the higher stimulation rate (2,020 pps) correlations were not significant. They were improved substantially, however, by introducing a factor that corrected for disparities due to temporal integration. Incorporation of this factor, which controls for the influence of the stimulation rate on the threshold, improved the correlations between EAP measures recorded at 80 pps and psychophysical MALs measured at 2,020 pps to better than r = 0.70.

CONCLUSIONS

EAP data as such can only be used to predict behavioral THRs or MCLs at low stimulation rates. To cope with temporal integration effects at higher stimulation rates, EAP data must be rate corrected. The introduction of a threshold-rate-factor is a promising way to achieve that goal. Further investigations need to be performed.