Prophylactic intravenous bolus ephedrine for elective Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia:

Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section commonly causes maternal hypotension. This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared methods to prevent hypotension in women receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. We selected randomised controlled trials that compared an intervention to prevent hypotension with another intervention or inactive control by searching MEDLINE and Embase, Web of Science to December 2018. There was no language restriction. Two reviewers extracted data on trial characteristics, methods and outcomes. We assessed risk of bias for individual trials (Cochrane tool) and quality of evidence (GRADE checklist). We assessed 109 trials (8561 women) and 12 different methods that resulted in 30 direct comparisons. Methods ranked by OR (95%CI) from most effective to least effective were: metaraminol 0.11 (0.04-0.26); norepinephrine 0.13 (0.06-0.28); phenylephrine 0.18 (0.11-0.29); leg compression 0.25 (0.14-0.43); ephedrine 0.28 (0.18-0.43); colloid given before induction of anaesthesia 0.38 (0.24-0.61); angiotensin 2, 0.12 (0.02-0.75); colloid given after induction of anaesthesia 0.52 (0.30-0.90); mephentermine 0.09 (0.01-1.30); crystalloid given after induction of anaesthesia 0.78 (0.46-1.31); and crystalloid given before induction of anaesthesia 1.16 (0.76-1.79). Phenylephrine caused maternal bradycardia compared with control, OR (95%CI) 0.23 (0.07-0.79). Ephedrine lowered umbilical artery pH more than phenylephrine, standardised mean difference (95%CI) 0.78 (0.47-1.49). We conclude that vasopressors should be given to healthy women to prevent hypotension during caesarean section with spinal anaesthesia.

Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

BACKGROUND

Maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. It can be associated with nausea or vomiting and may pose serious risks to the mother (unconsciousness, pulmonary aspiration) and baby (hypoxia, acidosis, neurological injury).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of prophylactic interventions for hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (9 August 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, including full texts and abstracts, comparing interventions to prevent hypotension with placebo or alternative treatment in women having spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. We excluded studies if hypotension was not an outcome measure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data from eligible studies. We report 'Summary of findings' tables using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 126 studies involving 9565 participants. Interventions were to prevent maternal hypotension following spinal anaesthesia only, and we excluded any interventions considered active treatment. All the included studies reported the review's primary outcome. Across 49 comparisons, we identified three intervention groups: intravenous fluids, pharmacological interventions, and physical interventions. Authors reported no serious adverse effects with any of the interventions investigated. Most trials reported hypotension requiring intervention and Apgar score of less than 8 at five minutes as the only outcomes. None of the trials included in the comparisons we describe reported admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Crystalloid versus control (no fluids)Fewer women experienced hypotension in the crystalloid group compared with no fluids (average risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.98; 370 women; 5 studies; low-quality evidence). There was no clear difference between groups in numbers of women with nausea and vomiting (average RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.91; 1 study; 69 women; very low-quality evidence). No baby had an Apgar score of less than 8 at five minutes in either group (60 babies, low-quality evidence). Colloid versus crystalloidFewer women experienced hypotension in the colloid group compared with the crystalloid group (average RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.80; 2105 women; 28 studies; very low-quality evidence). There were no clear differences between groups for maternal hypertension requiring intervention (average RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.09 to 4.46, 3 studies, 327 women;very low-quality evidence), maternal bradycardia requiring intervention (average RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.79, 6 studies, 509 women; very low-quality evidence), nausea and/or vomiting (average RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.13, 15 studies, 1154 women, I² = 37%; very low-quality evidence), neonatal acidosis (average RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.15 to 4.52, 6 studies, 678 babies; very low-quality evidence), or Apgar score of less than 8 at five minutes (average RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.05, 11 studies, 826 babies; very low-quality evidence). Ephedrine versus phenylephrineThere were no clear differences between ephedrine and phenylephrine groups for preventing maternal hypotension (average RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.18; 401 women; 8 studies; very low-quality evidence) or hypertension (average RR 1.72, 95% CI 0.71 to 4.16, 2 studies, 118 women, low-quality evidence). Rates of bradycardia were lower in the ephedrine group (average RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.64, 5 studies, 304 women, low-quality evidence). There was no clear difference in the number of women with nausea and/or vomiting (average RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.49, 4 studies, 204 women, I² = 37%, very low-quality evidence), or babies with neonatal acidosis (average RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.07 to 12.00, 3 studies, 175 babies, low-quality evidence). No baby had an Apgar score of less than 8 at five minutes in either group (321 babies; low-quality evidence). Ondansetron versus controlOndansetron administration was more effective than control (placebo saline) for preventing hypotension requiring treatment (average RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83; 740 women, 8 studies, low-quality evidence), bradycardia requiring treatment (average RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.87; 740 women, 8 studies, low-quality evidence), and nausea and/or vomiting (average RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.51; 653 women, 7 studies, low-quality evidence). There was no clear difference between the groups in rates of neonatal acidosis (average RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.09; 134 babies; 2 studies, low-quality evidence) or Apgar scores of less than 8 at five minutes (284 babies, low-quality evidence). Lower limb compression versus controlLower limb compression was more effective than control for preventing hypotension (average RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.78, 11 studies, 705 women, I² = 65%, very low-quality evidence). There was no clear difference between the groups in rates of bradycardia (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.56, 1 study, 74 women, very low-quality evidence) or nausea and/or vomiting (average RR 0.42 , 95% CI 0.14 to 1.27, 4 studies, 276 women, I² = 32%, very-low quality evidence). No baby had an Apgar score of less than 8 at five minutes in either group (130 babies, very low-quality evidence). Walking versus lyingThere was no clear difference between the groups for women with hypotension requiring treatment (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.21, 1 study, 37 women, very low-quality evidence).Many included studies reported little to no information that would allow an assessment of their risk of bias, limiting our ability to draw meaningful conclusions. GRADE assessments of the quality of evidence ranged from very low to low. We downgraded evidence for limitations in study design, imprecision, and indirectness; most studies assessed only women scheduled for elective caesarean sections.External validity also needs consideration. Readers should question the use of colloids in this context given the serious potential side effects such as allergy and renal failure associated with their administration.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

While interventions such as crystalloids, colloids, ephedrine, phenylephrine, ondansetron, or lower leg compression can reduce the incidence of hypotension, none have been shown to eliminate the need to treat maternal hypotension in some women. We cannot draw any conclusions regarding rare adverse effects associated with use of the interventions (for example colloids) due to the relatively small numbers of women studied.

Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters and the Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology present an updated report of the Practice Guidelines for Obstetric Anesthesia.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Effects of sitting up for five minutes versus immediately lying down after spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery on fluid and ephedrine requirement; a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Patient position after spinal anesthesia has had variable effects on blood pressure and ephedrine requirements. The aim of this study was to determine the effects that sitting the patient up for five minutes after spinal anesthesia would have on intraoperative fluid and ephedrine requirements.

METHODS

The study included 120 women at term gestation who were scheduled for Cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. After anesthetic administration, the women were randomized either to sit up for five minutes then lie down (Group S) or to lie down immediately (Group L) to a tilted supine position. A blinded observer recorded sensory block level, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, ephedrine and fluid requirements, adverse events, and time to motor recovery (modified Bromage score of 2).

RESULTS

Group S had a lower intraoperative sensory block height than Group L [T4 (1) vs T2 (1), respectively; P < 0.001]; Group S also required less ephedrine (8% vs 47%, respectively; P < 0.001), received less fluid [709 (59) mL vs 789 (90) mL, respectively; P < 0.001], and experienced less nausea and vomiting (5% vs 22%, respectively; P = 0.014) and shortness of breath (3% vs 28%, respectively; P < 0.001) intraoperatively. In Group S, the odds of requiring ephedrine were 0.09 compared with 0.89 in Group L (odds ratio 0.10). There were no differences in systolic blood pressure (P = 0.127) or heart rate (P = 0.831) over time between groups. Time to a modified Bromage score of 2 was longer in Group S than in Group L [101 (15) min vs 88 (14) min, respectively; P < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Sitting the patient up for five minutes rather than laying the patient down immediately after spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery decreased intraoperative sensory block height, ephedrine and fluid requirements, and intraoperative nausea, vomiting, and shortness of breath without affecting systolic blood pressure or the success of the anesthetic. However, the method resulted in delayed postoperative motor recovery.

[Prophylaxis for hypotension during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a randomized trial comparing hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 to ephedrine]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for scheduled or emergency cesarean section, but the prevalence of hypotension is high in this setting. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of a colloid (6% hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 130/0.4) to ephedrine for preventing hypotension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing elective or emergency cesarean section (in non-life-threatening situations) were enrolled. Patients were randomized to 3 groups for prophylaxis. The first ephedrine group received 5 mg of ephedrine intravenously (EPHE-5); the second ephedrine group received 10 mg of the drug intravenously (EPHE-10); and the HES group received 500 mL of HES 130/0.4 in rapid infusion n 15 minutes. We recorded systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate after 10 minutes in the operating room and 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after injection of the anesthetic. We also assessed the sensory and motor blockades on both sides 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 minutes after injection. Neonatal status was assessed by Apgar score and umbilical cord blood gas analysis.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients, 33 in each ephedrine group and 30 in the HES group, were enrolled. Blood pressure decreased similarly in all 3 groups (36% EPHE-5 group, 36% EPHE-10 group and 40% HES group); no significant between-group differences were observed. Nor were there significant differences in the percentages of patients requiring bolus doses of ephedrine to treat hypotension (23% in the HES group vs 33% in the EPHE-5 group and 27% in the EPHE-10 group) or in the cumulative doses of ephedrine. Neonatal status was also similarly satisfactory in all 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HES 130/0.4 is as useful for hypotension prophylaxis as 5-mg or 10-mg intravenous doses of ephedrine. HES 130/0.4 might be a substitute for sympathomimetic agents if adverse effects are predicted or contraindications to the use of such drugs are present.

Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients

BACKGROUND

Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section may cause hypotension, jeopardizing the foetus and its mother. We aimed to identify the spectrum of definitions of hypotension used in the scientific literature. In a second part, we applied these definitions to a prospective cohort in order to evaluate the effect of different definitions on the incidence of hypotension.

METHODS

A systematic literature search in PubMed was performed from 1999 to 2009 with the search terms 'hypotension' and 'caesarean section'. Consecutive parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were included in a prospective study.

RESULTS

Sixty-three eligible publications (7120 patients) were retrieved, revealing 15 different definitions of hypotension. A decrease below 80% baseline and the combined definition of a blood pressure below 100 mmHg or a decrease below 80% baseline were the two most frequent definitions, found in 25.4% and 20.6% of the papers, respectively. When applying the spectrum of definitions to a prospective cohort, the incidences of hypotension varied between 7.4% and 74.1%. The incidence increased from 26.7% to 38.5% when using a value below 75% of baseline instead of below 70% of baseline.

CONCLUSION

There is not one accepted definition of hypotension in the scientific literature. The incidence of hypotension varies depending on the chosen definition. Even minor changes of the definition cause major differences in the frequency of hypotension. This makes it difficult to compare studies on interventions to treat/prevent hypotension and probably hampers progress in this area of research.

Effects of Fluid Preload (Crystalloid or Colloid) Compared with Crystalloid Co-Load Plus Ephedrine Infusion on Hypotension and Neonatal Outcome during Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Delivery

Preload with crystalloid or colloid solution is widely recommended for the prevention of maternal hypotension during spinal anaesthesia. A combination of simultaneous rapid crystalloid infusion with vasopressor has also been suggested. This study tested the hypothesis that ephedrine infusion with crystalloid loading at spinal anaesthesia would reduce hypotension and alter neonatal outcome compared with fluid preloading.

One hundred and twenty women undergoing elective caesarean delivery were randomly allocated to one of three groups to receive rapid infusion of lactated Ringer's solution (20 ml.kg-1, n=40) or 4% succinylated gelatin solution (500 ml, n=40) before spinal anaesthesia or an ephedrine infusion (1.25 mg.minute-1) plus lactated Ringer's solution (1000 ml, n=40) after spinal anaesthesia. The incidence of hypotension (moderate and severe) and the ephedrine dose used to treat hypotension were compared. Neonatal outcome was assessed using Apgar scores and umblical venous and arterial blood gas analysis.

The frequency of moderate or severe hypotension was lower in the ephedrine group than in the crystalloid or colloid preload group (10% vs 51% and 38%; 5% vs 21% and 23% respectively, P <0.05). The incidence of nausea was significantly different between the crystalloid preload and ephedrine group. Umbilical blood gas analysis and Apgar scores were similar in all groups.

A combination of an ephedrine infusion at 1.25 mg.minute-1 with a crystalloid co-load was more effective than fluid preloading with crystalloid or colloid in the prevention of moderate and severe hypotension.

Interventions at caesarean section for reducing the risk of aspiration pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Aspiration pneumonitis is a syndrome resulting from the inhalation of gastric contents. The incidence in obstetric anaesthesia has fallen, largely due to improved anaesthetic techniques and the increased use of regional anaesthesia at caesarean section. However, aspiration pneumonitis is still a cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, and it is important to use effective prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether interventions given prior to caesarean section reduce the risk of aspiration pneumonitis in women with an uncomplicated pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (April 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials were included. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion, assessed risk of bias and carried out data extraction. Data entry was checked.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two studies, involving 2658 women, are included, all having a caesarean section under general anaesthesia. The studies covered a number of comparisons, but were mostly small and of unclear or poor quality.When compared to no treatment or placebo, there was a significant reduction in the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 with antacids (risk ratio (RR) 0.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.32, two studies, 108 women), H(2) antagonists (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.18, two studies, 170 women) and proton pump antagonists (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.46, one study 80 women). H(2) antagonists were associated with a reduced the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 at intubation when compared with proton pump antagonists (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.97, one study, 120 women), but compared with antacids the findings were unclear. The combined use of 'antacids plus H(2) antagonists' was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of intragastric pH < 2.5 at intubation when compared with placebo (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, one study, 89 women) or compared with antacids alone (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.92, one study, 119 women).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The quality of the evidence was poor, but the findings suggest that the combination of antacids plus H(2) antagonists was more effective than no intervention, and superior to antacids alone in preventing low gastric pH. However, none of the studies assessed potential adverse effects or substantive clinical outcomes. These findings are relevant for all women undergoing caesarean section under general anaesthesia.

Comparison of potency of ephedrine and mephentermine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in caesarean section

The dosages and potency of intravenous mephentermine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension are not available in English literature. This study was designed to determine the minimum effective dose (ED50) of mephentermine and to compare its potency with that of ephedrine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension in parturients undergoing caesarean section. Dixon's up-down method of sequential allocation was used for vasopressor doses. Following administration of spinal anaesthesia, patients received a prophylactic infusion with 50 mg infused over a period of 30 minutes as the initial dose and dose intervals of 5 mg, of either ephedrine or mephentermine. The ED50 of ephedrine was 25.0 mg (95% CI 15.5 to 40.4 mg). For mephentermine, the up-down method was abandoned due to the success of the minimum dose possible but the ED50 appeared to be less than 5 mg. In conclusion, the minimum effective dose of mephentermine is much less than that of ephedrine for prevention of post-spinal hypotension. Another trial with a lower starting dose and smaller dose interval of mephentermine is required to determine the potency ratio of mephentermine and ephedrine.

Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section

BACKGROUND

Maternal hypotension, the most frequent complication of spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section, can be associated with severe nausea or vomiting which can pose serious risks to the mother (unconsciousness, pulmonary aspiration) and baby (hypoxia, acidosis and neurological injury).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of prophylactic interventions for hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (November 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing interventions to prevent hypotension with placebo or alternative treatment in women having spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed eligibility and methodological quality of studies, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 75 trials (a total of 4624 women). Crystalloids were more effective than no fluids (relative risk (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60 to 1.00; one trial, 140 women, sequential analysis) and colloids were more effective than crystalloids (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.89; 11 trials, 698 women) in preventing hypotension following spinal anaesthesia at caesarean section. No differences were detected for different doses, rates or methods of administering colloids or crystalloids. Ephedrine was significantly more effective than control (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.78; seven trials, 470 women) or crystalloid (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.96; four trials, 293 women) in preventing hypotension. No significant differences in hypotension were seen between ephedrine and phenylephrine (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.44; three trials, 97 women) and phenylephrine was more effective than controls (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.45; two trials, 110 women). High rates or doses of ephedrine may increase hypertension and tachycardia incidence. Lower limb compression was more effective than control (no leg compression) (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.90; seven trials, 399 women) in preventing hypotension, although different methods of compression appeared to vary in their effectiveness. No other comparisons between different physical methods such as position were shown to be effective, but these trials were often small and thus underpowered to detect true effects should they exist.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

While interventions such as colloids, ephedrine, phenylephrine or lower leg compression can reduce the incidence of hypotension, none have been shown to eliminate the need to treat maternal hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. No conclusions can be drawn regarding rare adverse effects due to the relatively small numbers of women studied.

Intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean section under regional anesthesia

Nausea and vomiting during regional anesthesia for cesarean section are very common and unpleasant events. They cause significant distress to the patient and also interfere with the surgical procedure. They have multiple etiologies, which include hypotension, vagal hyperactivity, visceral pain, i.v. opioid supplementation, uterotonic agents and motion. The obstetric anesthesia literature has addressed these causative factors for nausea and vomiting individually, making it difficult for the anesthesiologists to have a comprehensive understanding of these important complications. This review highlights the anesthetic and non-anesthetic causes of intraoperative nausea and vomiting during regional anesthesia for cesarean section and the appropriate prophylactic and therapeutic management. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting can be best prevented by controlling hypotension, optimizing the use of neuraxial and i.v. opioids, improving the quality of block, minimizing surgical stimuli and judicious administration of uterotonic agents. Although prophylactic antiemetics have been advocated during cesarean sections, strict adherence to these practices can effectively lower the incidence of intraoperative nausea and vomiting without the requirement of antiemetic agents. Antiemetics, therefore, should be reserved for the prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients and for the treatment of nausea and vomiting not responding to routine measures.

Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia and simultaneous intravenous bolus of combined phenylephrine and ephedrine versus ephedrine for cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery can produce adverse maternal symptoms and neonatal acid-base effects. Single-agent prophylaxis, most notably with ephedrine, does not reliably prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension; recently, however, the prophylactic use of phenylephrine with ephedrine as an infusion was observed to be effective. We postulated that this combination, when given as an intravenous bolus for prophylaxis and rescue treatment, could be similarly effective.

METHOD

Forty-three term parturients were randomized to receive a bolus of ephedrine 10 mg +/- phenylephrine 40 microg (groups E and EP, respectively) simultaneously with spinal anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure below 100 mmHg or a decrease of 20% from a baseline value. Rescue boluses comprised of ephedrine 5 mg +/- phenylephrine 20 microg.

RESULTS

For groups E and EP, respectively, the incidence of hypotension was 80% vs. 95% (P=0.339), with the mean number of rescue boluses being 3.85+/-3.7 and 3.05+/-1.7 and the mean umbilical artery pH being 7.246+/-0.081 vs. 7.244+/-0.106. All comparisons were not significant (NS).

CONCLUSION

The combination of ephedrine and phenylephrine given as an intravenous bolus at the doses selected is not superior to ephedrine alone in preventing or treating hypotension in healthy parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.

Prophylactic effects of systemic oral ephedrine in spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during transurethral prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the prophylactic effects of systemic oral ephedrine in spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during transurethral prostatectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists Grade II and III patients scheduled for spinal anesthesia were randomized into one of two groups. Patients in Group I (n = 30) received oral ephedrine 50 mg in addition to premedication whilst those in Group II (n = 30) received only premedication 30 min before spinal anesthesia. Pre-infusion values were measured in order to obtain baseline readings after oral ephedrine administration in Group I and after premedication in Group II. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before and after infusion, during and 5 min after spinal anesthesia and intraoperatively. Hypotension was defined as SAP <100 mmHg and <20% of baseline value. Hypotension was treated with 3 mg ephedrine and bradycardia was corrected with atropine 0.5 mg, given as an i.v. bolus.

RESULTS

SAP values were significantly lower in Group II during the spinal anesthesia, post-spinal and intraoperative periods (p < 0.0001). Fifteen patients received ephedrine in Group II and seven in Group I. Supplemental ephedrine was used at doses of 3.42 +/- 0.97 mg in Group I and 8.86 +/- 1.24 mg in Group II. The incidence of hypotension was halved in Group I compared to Group II (23.33% vs 50%, p = 0.003). Six patients received atropine in Group II because of severe bradycardia. Mean HR values were lower in Group II than Group I during the spinal anesthesia, post-spinal and intraoperative periods.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a prophylactic oral dose of ephedrine 50 mg is effective for minimizing and managing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during transurethral prostatectomy.

Factors determining the duration of tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery: a single-centre sequential patient audit

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The study was designed to identify those factors associated with early tracheal extubation following cardiac surgery. Previous studies have tended to concentrate on surgery for coronary artery bypass or on other selected cohorts.

METHODS

Sequential cohort analysis of 296 unselected adult cardiac surgery patients was performed over 3 months.

RESULTS

In total, 39% of all patients were extubated within 6 h, 89% within 24 h and 95% within 48 h. Delayed extubation (>6 h after surgery) appeared unrelated to age, gender, body mass index, a previous pattern of angina or myocardial infarction, diabetes, preoperative atrial fibrillation, and preoperative cardiovascular assessment, as well as other factors. Delayed tracheal extubation was associated with poor left ventricular, renal and pulmonary function, a high Euroscore, as well as the type, duration and urgency of surgery. Early extubation (<6 h) was not associated with a reduced length of stay in either the intensive care unit or in hospital compared with patients who were extubated between 6 and 24 h. In these groups, it is presumed that organizational and not clinical factors appear to be responsible for a delay in discharge from intensive care. Patients who were extubated after 24 h had a longer duration of hospital stay and a greater incidence of postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were not adversely affected by early tracheal extubation.

CONCLUSIONS

In an unselected sequential cohort, both patient- and surgery-specific factors may be influential in determining the duration of postoperative ventilation of the lungs following cardiac surgery. In view of the changing nature of the surgical population, regular re-evaluation is useful in reassessing performance.

Injection pain of rocuronium and vecuronium is evoked by direct activation of nociceptive nerve endings

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Rocuronium and, to a lesser extent, vecuronium can induce burning sensations associated with withdrawal reactions during administration. Dermal microdialysis in human and electrophysiological recordings of nociceptors in mouse skin were used to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of pain induction.

METHODS

Microdialysis catheters were inserted intradermally into the forearm of 10 volunteers and were perfused with two different concentrations of rocuronium and vecuronium (1 and 10 mg mL(-1)) or a control. Dialysis samples were taken every 15 min and analysed for protein, histamine, tryptase and bradykinin content. Pain intensity was rated on a numerical scale of 0-10. In a parallel design, activation of cutaneous nociceptors was assessed directly in a skin-nerve in vitro preparation of the mouse hind paw. The receptive fields of identified single C-nociceptors (n = 12) were superfused with rocuronium or vecuronium solutions (10 mg mL(-1)) at physiological pH.

RESULTS

In accordance with clinical observations, microdialysis of rocuronium (10 mg mL(-1)) induced sharp burning pain (NRS 4.1 +/- 1.8), whereas vecuronium given in the usual clinical concentration (1 mg mL(-1)) induced only minor pain sensations (NRS 0.6 +/- 1.3). At equimolar concentrations, pain sensation and concomitant mediator release evoked by both drugs were similar. No correlations were found between pain rating and mediator release. In the in vitro preparation, C-fibres showed a consistent excitatory response with rapid onset after stimulation with vecuronium as well as rocuronium (differences not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

The algogenic effect of aminosteroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs can be attributed to a direct activation of C-nociceptors.

Anaesthetic strategies to reduce perioperative blood loss in paediatric surgery

In adults, a number of measures to reduce perioperative blood loss have been established. These techniques serve to reduce patients' exposure to homologous blood. Most adults are concerned with this issue especially since many patients became infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during the 1980s through exposure to blood components. While blood-saving strategies are widely used in adults, they are mostly neglected in infants. However, it is these young patients with their whole life in front of them who, it could be argued, would benefit especially from any potentially avoidable infection (HIV, hepatitis, etc.) or immunological complications. In infants and small children, these blood-sparing techniques may not be as effective as in adults and technical limitations may prevent their application. However, some of these measures can be used and may serve to prevent or reduce exposure to homologous blood. In the following review, blood-saving techniques established in adults are described and their applicability for paediatric patients discussed.

Effects of propofol on the systolic and diastolic performance of the postischaemic, reperfused myocardium in rabbits

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The effect of propofol on myocardial dysfunction during ischaemia and reperfusion is controversial yet important because of its frequent use in cardiac anaesthesia. Although animal studies suggest a free radical-scavenging potential, the cardioprotective properties of propofol have not been demonstrated consistently in vivo. Previous studies focused on systolic function while diastolic function may be a more sensitive marker of ischaemic injury. The main aim was to document the effect of propofol on diastolic function in isolated, blood perfused rabbit hearts subjected to moderate global ischaemia and reperfusion.

METHODS

Propofol 168 micromol L(-1), or the equivalent of its vehicle, Intralipid, was administered to 34 paced parabiotic Langendorff blood-perfused isolated rabbit hearts before and after 30 min of global normothermic ischaemia. Recovery of systolic function was quantified with the maximum rate of rise of left ventricular pressure. Diastolic performance was assessed using the time constant of the decline in left ventricular pressure (tau) and chamber stiffness (VdP/dV at 12 mmHg).

RESULTS

Recovery of systolic function during reperfusion was comparable in the two groups. There was no difference in left ventricular pressure between the two groups at any time during the experiments. Chamber stiffness increased significantly during ischaemia and reperfusion in the control group (from 34 +/- 9 to 54 +/- 8 mmHg during ischaemia, and 43 +/- 5 mmHg after 30 min reperfusion; mean +/-95% confidence interval) but not in the propofol-treated group (29 +/- 5, 36 +/- 8 and 30 +/- 8 at baseline, ischaemia and 30 min reperfusion, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol has no protective effect on active relaxation or on systolic function in the present model, but it reduces ischaemic and postischaemic chamber stiffness.

Effects of bupivacaine used with sevoflurane on the rhythm and contractility in the isolated rat heart

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The effects of sevoflurane on bupivacaine cardiotoxicity are mainly attributed to systemic effects. The purpose of this study was to investigate the direct myocardial effects of sevoflurane on bupivacaine toxicity.

METHODS

Hearts of 30 Wistar albino rats were isolated and mounted on a Langendorff apparatus perfused by modified Tyrode solution. Experimental groups were: a sevoflurane group (Group S, n = 10)--following baseline and 20 min (Stage 1) recordings, sevoflurane was added in doses of 1.4% (1 MAC) and 2.8% (2 MAC). In the two bupivacaine groups, bupivacaine 5 micromol (Group B5, n = 10) and bupivacaine 10 micromol (Group B10, n = 10) was added to the solution at Stage 1, and sevoflurane was added to the system as in Group S. Haemodynamic variables, i.e. heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, left ventricular systolic pressure, contractility (+dp/dtmax), relaxation, time to reach peak systolic pressure, change in left ventricular diastolic pressure from baseline, and rate-pressure product were recorded.

RESULTS

In Group S, there was no change in cardiac rhythm. In bupivacaine groups, severe rhythm disturbances occurred and both the PR intervals and QRS complexes were prolonged significantly. All contractility variables deteriorated and the rate-pressure product decreased by 67-90% with the addition of bupivacaine. In all groups, 2 MAC sevoflurane lowered +dp/dtmax further.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane does not have any untoward effect on bupivacaine-induced cardiotoxicity in clinically relevant doses in the isolated rat heart.

Effect of the neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 7-nitroindazole on the righting reflex ED50 and minimum alveolar concentration during sevoflurane anaesthesia in rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine the effect of acute and chronic administration of 7-nitroindazole, a selective neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, on the righting reflex ED50 and the minimum alveolar concentration during sevoflurane anaesthesia in rats.

METHODS

7-Nitroindazole was acutely (0, 50 and 100 mg kg(-1)) and chronically (0 and 150 mg kg(-1) day(-1), 4 days) administered to rats. After the preparation, the minimum alveolar concentration and the righting reflex ED50 were measured. The concentration of cGMP in the brain, cerebellum and spinal cord was also measured.

RESULTS

Acute administration reduced the minimum alveolar concentration (50 mg kg(-1), 58.8% (95% CI: 50.3-67.3%) of the baseline value, P < 0.01; 100 mg kg(-1), 55.8 (46.9-64.7), P < 0.01) and the righting reflex ED50 (50 mg kg(-1), 27.2 (17.2-37.2), P < 0.01; 100 mg kg(-1), 14.3 (6.6-22.0), P < 0.01). Chronic administration did not reduce the minimum alveolar concentration; however, it reduced the righting reflex ED50 (65.3 (52.9-77.7), P < 0.01). Overall, the reduction in minimum alveolar concentration in the acute and chronic protocol did not correlate with that of the righting reflex ED50. 7-Nitroindazole (100 mg kg(-1), acute) reduced the cGMP concentration within the cerebellum by 55.4%; however, it did not decrease concentrations in the brain or spinal cord.

CONCLUSIONS

Different mechanisms are responsible for the observed alterations to the minimum alveolar concentration and the righting reflex ED50 following treatment with 7-nitroindazole. The nitric oxide-cGMP pathway might play a less important role in the determination of minimum alveolar concentration than the righting reflex ED50.

Suprascapular nerve block or a piroxicam patch for shoulder tip pain after day case laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The reported incidence of shoulder tip pain following laparoscopic surgery varies from 35 to 63%. This study evaluated the analgesic efficacy of either performing a prophylactic suprascapular nerve block with bupivacaine or applying a piroxicam patch to the skin over both shoulders for the relief of shoulder tip pain after laparoscopy.

METHODS

Sixty healthy informed female patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (a) a control group (n = 20), no treatment; (b) a suprascapular nerve block group (n = 20) in which a bilateral suprascapular nerve block was performed before induction of anaesthesia with 5 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine; and (c) a piroxicam patch group (n = 20) in which a 48 mg piroxicam patch on the skin of each shoulder was applied before induction of anaesthesia. All patients received a total intravenous anaesthesia technique with propofol, fentanyl and vecuronium. Shoulder tip and wound pain were recorded on a visual analogue pain scale at five time intervals for 24 h after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 80% of patients in the control group, 75% in the suprascapular nerve block group and 45% in the piroxicam patch group complained of shoulder tip pain during the recording period (P < 0.05). The scores for shoulder tip pain in the piroxicam patch group were significantly lower compared with the control group at 3, 6 and 12 h, and compared with the suprascapular nerve block group at 6 and 12 h. The need for analgesics was also significantly lower in the piroxicam patch group compared with the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic piroxicam patches are effective and safe for the relief of shoulder tip pain after laparoscopy. Bilateral suprascapular nerve block is not effective in this setting.

Treatment of hiccup during general anaesthesia or sedation: a qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Acute hiccup is a minor complication that can occur during sedation or general anaesthesia. The disorder can disturb the surgical field, might interfere with lung ventilation or could hamper diagnostic procedures. The objective was to perform a systematic search for interventions aimed at treating hiccup occurring during anaesthesia or sedation.

METHODS

A systematic search for reports describing interventions to treat hiccup in conjunction with anaesthesia was carried out (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane-Library, manual screening of reference lists and review articles, up to December 2001). Search terms were 'hiccup', 'singultus' or 'hiccough'.

RESULTS

Twenty-six reports involving approximately 581 patients focused on hiccup remedies in the anaesthesia setting. Only one report was substantiated by a randomized controlled trial. This investigated methylphenidate 10 mg intravenously in 51 patients, which did not show a beneficial effect compared with placebo. Hiccup was a self-limiting phenomenon. Case series and case reports focused on various systemically applied drugs in 12 reports, stimulating techniques (e.g. pharyngeal stimulation) in seven, topical applied remedies (e.g. intranasal ice-cold water) in four, and ventilation techniques (e.g. continuous positive pressure ventilation) in two.

CONCLUSIONS

A large variety of interventions have been proposed for the treatment of hiccup during anaesthesia and sedation. However, perioperative treatment is still based on empirical findings and no treatment is 'evidence-based'. Thus, no valid recommendations for the treatment of hiccup can be derived. Uncontrolled observations are inadequate to establish treatment efficacy.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new propofol prodrug GPI 15715 in rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We studied the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GPI 15715 (Aquavan injection), a new water-soluble prodrug metabolized to propofol by hydrolysis.

METHODS

Nine adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (398 +/- 31 g) received a bolus dose of 40 mg GPI 15715. The plasma concentrations of GPI 15715 and propofol were determined from arterial blood samples, and the pharmacokinetics of both compounds were investigated using compartment models whereby the elimination from the central compartment of GPI 15715 was used as drug input for the central compartment of propofol. Pharmacodynamics were assessed using the median frequency of the EEG power spectrum.

RESULTS

A maximum propofol concentration of 7.1 +/- 1.7 microg mL(-1) was reached 3.7 +/- 0.2 min after bolus administration. Pharmacokinetics were best described by two-compartment models. GPI 15715 showed a short half-life (2.9 +/- 0.2 and 23.9 +/- 9.9 min), an elimination rate constant of 0.18 +/- 0.01 min(-1) and a central volume of distribution of 0.25 +/- 0.02 L kg(-1). For propofol, the half-life was 1.9 +/- 0.1 and 45 +/- 7 min, the elimination rate constant was 0.15 +/- 0.02 min(-1) and the central volume of distribution was 2.3 +/- 0.6 L kg(-1). The maximum effect on the electroencephalogram (EEG)--EEG suppression for >4 s--occurred 6.5 +/- 1.2 min after bolus administration and baseline values of the EEG median frequency were regained 30 min later. The EEG effect could be described by a sigmoid Emax model including an effect compartment (E0 = 16.9 +/- 7.9 Hz, EC50 = 2.6 +/- 0.8 microg mL(-1), ke0 = 0.35 +/- 0.04 min(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with known propofol formulations, propofol from GPI 15715 showed a longer half-life, an increased volume of distribution, a delayed onset, a sustained duration of action and a greater potency with respect to concentration.

High-affinity block of voltage-operated rat IIA neuronal sodium channels by 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol, a propofol analogue

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Propofol is a phenol derivative (2,6 di-isopropylphenol) with a unique effect profile including activating effects on GABA(A) and blocking effects on voltage-operated sodium channels. If the substituents in the 2- and the 6-positions are replaced by tert-butyl groups, the resulting phenol derivative, 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol, despite being a close structural propofol analogue, completely lacks GABA(A) receptor effects. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effects of 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol on voltage-operated neuronal sodium channels in order to determine whether and, if so, how these structural changes alter the sodium channel-blocking effect seen with propofol.

METHODS

Whole-cell sodium inward currents through heterologously expressed rat type IIA sodium channels were recorded in the absence and presence of definite concentrations of 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol and propofol.

RESULTS

When applied at concentrations > or = 30 micromol, 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol completely and irreversibly blocked sodium inward currents. The blockade equilibrium time was about 2 min. A partial washout was possible only if the application was stopped before the equilibrium of the blockade was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

2,6 Di-tert-butylphenol exerts a high-affinity block of neuronal sodium channels. Apparently, the slight structural differences of 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol in comparison with propofol--which account for the lack of GABA(A) receptor effects--enhance its voltage-operated sodium channel-blocking effects. As 2,6 di-tert-butylphenol is much more potent than most sodium channel blockers in clinical use, it might be of interest in the development of local anaesthetics.

Effects of rolipram, pimobendan and zaprinast on ischaemia-induced dysrhythmias and on ventricular cyclic nucleotide content in the anaesthetized rat

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the haemodynamic, electrophysiological and pharmacodynamic effects of three selective inhibitors of the different isoenzyme forms of phosphodiesterase (PDE) on ischaemia-induced dysrhythmias in the anaesthetized rat. The drugs used were pimobendan, a selective PDE III inhibitor, rolipram, a selective PDE IV inhibitor, and zaprinast, a selective PDE V inhibitor.

METHODS

The coronary artery was occluded 15 min after commencing drug administration, and myocardial ischaemia was maintained for 30 min during which the heart rate and mean arterial pressure were recorded. cAMP and cGMP were determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with rolipram decreased the duration of ventricular tachycardia without any change in the incidences of dysrhythmias or the mortality rate. This drug did not modify ventricular content of adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) or guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP). Pimobendan (1 mg kg(-1) + 0.1 mg kg(-1) min) decreased the duration of ventricular tachycardia. This dose of pimobendan and zaprinast (1 mg kg(-1) + 0.1 mg kg(-1) min(-1)) increased the incidence rate of ventricular fibrillation following coronary artery ligation and the mortality rate. Moreover, both drugs increased cGMP in the ventricle.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated that pimobendan and zaprinast increased the incidence of dysrhythmias and the mortality rate, which was accompanied by an increase in the ventricular content of cGMP. Rolipram decreased the duration of ventricular tachycardia without a change in the cyclic nucleotide content or in the mortality rate.