1
|
Pasqual E, Turner MC, Gracia-Lavedan E, Casabonne D, Benavente Y, Chef IT, Maynadié M, Cocco P, Staines A, Foretova L, Nieters A, Boffetta P, Brennan P, Cardis E, de Sanjose S. Association of ionizing radiation dose from common medical diagnostic procedures and lymphoma risk in the Epilymph case-control study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235658. [PMID: 32649712 PMCID: PMC7351167 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Medical diagnostic X-rays are an important source of ionizing radiation (IR) exposure in the general population; however, it is unclear if the resulting low patient doses increase lymphoma risk. We examined the association between lifetime medical diagnostic X-ray dose and lymphoma risk, taking into account potential confounding factors, including medical history. The international Epilymph study (conducted in the Czech-Republic, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and Spain) collected self-reported information on common diagnostic X-ray procedures from 2,362 lymphoma cases and 2,465 frequency-matched (age, sex, country) controls. Individual lifetime cumulative bone marrow (BM) dose was estimated using time period-based dose estimates for different procedures and body parts. The association between categories of BM dose and lymphoma risk was examined using unconditional logistic regression models adjusting for matching factors, socioeconomic variables, and the presence of underlying medical conditions (atopic, autoimmune, infectious diseases, osteoarthritis, having had a sick childhood, and family history of lymphoma) as potential confounders of the association. Cumulative BM dose was low (median 2.25 mGy) and was not positively associated with lymphoma risk. Odds ratios (ORs) were consistently less than 1.0 in all dose categories compared to the reference category (less than 1 mGy). Results were similar after adjustment for potential confounding factors, when using different exposure scenarios, and in analyses by lymphoma subtype and by type of control (hospital-, population-based). Overall no increased risk of lymphoma was observed. The reduced ORs may be related to unmeasured confounding or other sources of systematic bias.We found little evidence that chronic medical conditions confound lymphoma risk and medical radiation associations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Pasqual
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Michelle C. Turner
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Esther Gracia-Lavedan
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Delphine Casabonne
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Unit of Infections and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yolanda Benavente
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Unit of Infections and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Isabelle Thierry Chef
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Marc Maynadié
- Registre des Hémopathies Malignes de Côte d’Or INSERM U 1231, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté et CHU Dijon-Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Pierluigi Cocco
- Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Occupational Health Section, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Anthony Staines
- School of Nursing and Human Science, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and MF MU, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Alexandra Nieters
- Centre of Chronic Immunodeficiency, Molecular Epidemiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Paolo Boffetta
- Tisch Cancer Institute and Institute for Translational Epidemiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Paul Brennan
- IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Elisabeth Cardis
- Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Silvia de Sanjose
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Unit of Infections and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fontana RC, Pasqual E, Miller DL, Simon SL, Cardis E, Thierry-Chef I. Trends in Estimated Thyroid, Salivary Gland, Brain, and Eye Lens Doses From Intraoral Dental Radiography Over Seven Decades (1940 TO 2009). HEALTH PHYSICS 2020; 118:136-148. [PMID: 31634260 PMCID: PMC6940029 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to support retrospective dose estimation for epidemiological studies by providing estimates of historical absorbed organ doses to the brain, lens of the eye, salivary glands, and thyroid from intraoral dental radiographic examinations performed from 1940 to 2009. We simulated organ doses to an adult over 10 y time periods from 1940 to 2009, based on commonly used sets of x-ray machine settings collected from the literature. Simulations to estimate organ dose were performed using personal computer x-ray Monte Carlo software. Overall, organ doses were less than 1 mGy for a single intraoral radiograph for all decades. From 1940 to 2009, doses to the brain, eye lens, salivary glands, and thyroid decreased by 86, 96, 95, and 89%, respectively. Of these four organs, the salivary glands received the highest doses, with values decreasing from about 0.23 mGy in the 1940s to 0.025 mGy in the 2000s for a single intraoral radiograph. Based on simulations using collected historical data on x-ray technical parameters, improvements in technology and optimization of the technical settings used to perform intraoral dental radiography have resulted in a decrease in absorbed dose to the brain, eye lens, salivary glands, and thyroid over the period from 1940 to 2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - D L Miller
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - S L Simon
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sadakane A, Landes RD, Sakata R, Nagano J, Shore RE, Ozasa K. Medical Radiation Exposure among Atomic Bomb Survivors: Understanding its Impact on Risk Estimates of Atomic Bomb Radiation. Radiat Res 2019; 191:507-517. [PMID: 30925137 DOI: 10.1667/rr15054.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
There have been some concerns about the influence of medical X rays in dose-response analysis of atomic bomb radiation on health outcomes. Among atomic bomb survivors in the Life Span Study, the association between atomic bomb radiation dose and exposures to medical X rays was investigated using questionnaire data collected by a mail survey conducted between 2007-2011, soliciting information on the history of computed tomography (CT) scans, gastrointestinal fluoroscopy, angiography and radiotherapy. Among 12,670 participants, 76% received at least one CT scan; 77%, a fluoroscopic examination; 23%, an angiographic examination; and 8%, radiotherapy. Descriptive and multivariable-adjusted analyses showed that medical X rays were administered in greater frequencies among those who were exposed to an atomic bomb radiation dose of 1.0 Gy or higher, compared to those exposed to lower doses. This is possibly explained by a greater frequency in major chronic diseases such as cancer in the ≥1.0 Gy group. The frequency of medical X rays in the groups exposed to 0.005-0.1 Gy or 0.1-1.0 Gy did not differ significantly from those exposed to <0.005 Gy. An analysis of finer dose groups under 1 Gy likewise showed no differences in frequencies of medical X rays. Thus, no evidence of material confounding of atomic bomb effects was found. Among those exposed to atomic bomb doses <1 Gy, doses were not associated with medical radiation exposures. The significant association of doses ≥1 Gy with medical radiation exposures likely produces no substantive bias in radiation effect estimates because diagnostic medical X-ray doses are much lower than the atomic bomb doses. Further information on actual medical X-ray doses and on the validity of self-reports of X-ray procedures would strengthen this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuko Sadakane
- a Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Reid D Landes
- b Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Science, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Ritsu Sakata
- a Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Jun Nagano
- c Department of Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Roy E Shore
- d Department of New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Kotaro Ozasa
- a Department of Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boulton F. Ionising radiation and childhood leukaemia revisited. Med Confl Surviv 2019; 35:144-170. [PMID: 30821174 DOI: 10.1080/13623699.2019.1571684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Increased incidences of childhood acute leukaemia were noted among survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In Western societies, Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia has a distinct epidemiology peaking at 3 years old. Exposure to ionising radiation is an established hazard but it is difficult to gauge the precise risk of less than 100 mSv. Since 1983 significant leukaemia incidences have been reported among families residing near nuclear installations. The target cells (naïve neonatal lymphocytes) get exposed to multiple xenobiotic challenges and undergo extraordinary proliferation and physiological somatic genetic change. Population movements and ionising radiation are considered taking account of updated understanding of radiation biology, cancer cytogenetics and immunological diversity. Double Strand Breaks in DNA arise through metabolic generation of Reactive Oxygen Species, and nearly always are repaired; but mis-repairs can be oncogenic. Recombinant Activating Gene enzymes in rapidly dividing perinatal pre-B lymphocytes being primed for antibody diversity are targeted to Signal Sequences in the Immunoglobulin genes. off target pseudo-sequences may allow RAG enzymes to create autosomal DSBs which, when mis-repaired, become translocated oncogenes. Immunogens acting by chance at crucial stages may facilitate this. In such circumstances, oncogenic DSBs from ionising radiation are less likely to be significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Boulton
- Medact , London , UK.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton , Southampton , UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Melo DR, Miller DL, Chang L, Moroz B, Linet MS, Simon SL. Organ Doses From Diagnostic Medical Radiography-Trends Over Eight Decades (1930 to 2010). HEALTH PHYSICS 2016; 111:235-55. [PMID: 27472750 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000000524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
This study provides a retrospective assessment of doses to 13 organs for the most common radiographic examinations conducted between the 1930s and 2010, taking into account typical technical parameters used for radiography during those years. This study is intended to be a resource on changes in medical diagnostic radiation exposure over time with a specific purpose of supporting retrospective epidemiological studies of radiation health risks. The authors derived organ doses to the brain, esophagus, thyroid, red bone marrow, lungs, breast, heart, stomach, liver, colon, urinary bladder, ovaries, and testes based on 14 common radiographic procedures and compared, when possible, with doses reported in the literature. These dose estimates were based on radiographic exposure parameters described in textbooks widely used by radiologic technologists in training from 1939 to 2010. The derived estimated doses presented here are believed to be representative of typical organs for an average-size adult who might be considered to be similar to the reference person. There were large variations in organ doses noted among the different types of radiographic examinations. Doses were highest in organs within the area imaged and next highest in organs in close proximity to the area imaged. Estimated organ doses have declined substantially [overall 22-fold (±38)] over time as a consequence of changes in technology, imaging protocols and protective measures. For some examinations, only slight differences were observed in doses for the decades of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s due to minor changes in technical parameters. Substantial dose reductions were observed in the 1990s and 2000s.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dunstana R Melo
- *Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (DCEG), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (now at Melohill Technology, Rockville, MD); †Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD; ‡DCEG, NCI, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laborde-Castérot H, Laurier D, Caër-Lorho S, Etard C, Acker A, Rage E. Chest X-ray screening examinations among French uranium miners: exposure estimation and impact on radon-associated lung cancer risk. Occup Environ Med 2014; 71:611-8. [PMID: 25017574 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical surveillance of uranium miners can include periodic chest X-ray examinations. This study aimed to assess the X-ray exposure due to occupational health monitoring in the French cohort of uranium miners, and to test whether consideration of this additional radiation exposure impacts the excess risk of lung cancer death associated with radon exposure. METHOD X-ray exposure due to occupational health monitoring was estimated retrospectively based on review of a sample of miners' medical records and bibliographic data. Four exposure scenarios were designed, differing in their assumptions about the type of procedures performed, their frequency, and the lung dose delivered. Radon exposure and lung doses from exposure to α-particle emitters and external γ rays have previously been individually assessed. Exposure-risk and dose-risk relations were estimated by Poisson regression with a linear excess relative risk (ERR) model. RESULTS The cohort included 5086 miners with a mean follow-up duration of 30.1 years. The mean number of chest X-ray examinations ranged from 15.1 in the lowest to 34 in the highest-exposure scenario, and produced a mean cumulative lung dose ranging from 4.6 to 34.2 mGy. The role of occupation-related imaging screening X-ray procedures in total equivalent lung dose appeared insignificant compared to α-emitter exposure. X-ray exposure was not associated with lung cancer mortality risk. The ERR associated with radon remained significantly positive when X-ray exposure was included in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS X-ray exposure did not confound the exposure-risk relation between radon and lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hervé Laborde-Castérot
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), PRP-HOM, SRBE, LEPID, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre, Occupational Health Unit, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Laurier
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), PRP-HOM, SRBE, LEPID, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Sylvaine Caër-Lorho
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), PRP-HOM, SRBE, LEPID, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Cécile Etard
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), PRP-HOM, SER, UEM, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | | | - Estelle Rage
- Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), PRP-HOM, SRBE, LEPID, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL, Kleinerman R, Lee C, Rajaraman P, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62:75-100. [PMID: 22307864 PMCID: PMC3548988 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 227] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The 600% increase in medical radiation exposure to the US population since 1980 has provided immense benefit, but increased potential future cancer risks to patients. Most of the increase is from diagnostic radiologic procedures. The objectives of this review are to summarize epidemiologic data on cancer risks associated with diagnostic procedures, describe how exposures from recent diagnostic procedures relate to radiation levels linked with cancer occurrence, and propose a framework of strategies to reduce radiation from diagnostic imaging in patients. We briefly review radiation dose definitions, mechanisms of radiation carcinogenesis, key epidemiologic studies of medical and other radiation sources and cancer risks, and dose trends from diagnostic procedures. We describe cancer risks from experimental studies, future projected risks from current imaging procedures, and the potential for higher risks in genetically susceptible populations. To reduce future projected cancers from diagnostic procedures, we advocate the widespread use of evidence-based appropriateness criteria for decisions about imaging procedures; oversight of equipment to deliver reliably the minimum radiation required to attain clinical objectives; development of electronic lifetime records of imaging procedures for patients and their physicians; and commitment by medical training programs, professional societies, and radiation protection organizations to educate all stakeholders in reducing radiation from diagnostic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha S Linet
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7238, USA.
| | - Thomas L Slovis
- Chief, Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI
| | - Donald L Miller
- Acting Chief, Diagnostic Devices Branch, Division of Mammography Quality and Radiation Program Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD
| | - Ruth Kleinerman
- Epidemiologist, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Investigator, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Preetha Rajaraman
- Investigator, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
- Senior Investigator, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pogoda JM, Nichols PW, Ross RK, Stram DO, Thomas DC, Preston-Martin S. Diagnostic radiography and adult acute myeloid leukaemia: an interview and medical chart review study. Br J Cancer 2011; 104:1482-6. [PMID: 21522150 PMCID: PMC3101931 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2010] [Revised: 02/10/2011] [Accepted: 03/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aetiology of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is not well understood, perhaps because of its distinct subtypes. High-dose ionising radiation is a known risk factor, but less is known about risk from low-dose exposure such as from diagnostic radiography. METHODS Subjects were 412 matched case-control pairs. Ten-year subject histories of diagnostic radiography were based on interview and medical records. RESULTS There was no convincing association between AML risk and ionising radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging procedures, either for AML overall or for any AML subtype. CONCLUSION The association between diagnostic radiography and AML risk remains uncertain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Pogoda
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles CA 90089, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bhatti P, Yong LC, Doody MM, Preston DL, Kampa DM, Ramsey MJ, Ward EM, Edwards AA, Ron E, Tucker JD, Sigurdson AJ. Diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased chromosome translocations: evidence from three studies. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2010; 49:685-92. [PMID: 20602108 PMCID: PMC3075914 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-010-0307-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2009] [Accepted: 06/07/2010] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Controversy regarding potential health risks from increased use of medical diagnostic radiologic examinations has come to public attention. We evaluated whether chromosome damage, specifically translocations, which are a potentially intermediate biomarker for cancer risk, was increased after exposure to diagnostic X-rays, with particular interest in the ionizing radiation dose-response below the level of approximately 50 mGy. Chromosome translocation frequency data from three separately conducted occupational studies of ionizing radiation were pooled together. Studies 1 and 2 included 79 and 150 medical radiologic technologists, respectively, and study 3 included 83 airline pilots and 50 university faculty members (total = 155 women and 207 men; mean age = 62 years, range 34-90). Information on personal history of radiographic examinations was collected from a detailed questionnaire. We computed a cumulative red bone marrow (RBM) dose score based on the numbers and types of X-ray examinations reported with 1 unit approximating 1 mGy. Poisson regression analyses were adjusted for age and laboratory method. Mean RBM dose scores were 49, 42, and 11 for Studies 1-3, respectively (overall mean = 33.5, range 0-303). Translocation frequencies significantly increased with increasing dose score (P < 0.001). Restricting the analysis to the lowest dose scores of under 50 did not materially change these results. We conclude that chromosome damage is associated with low levels of radiation exposure from diagnostic X-ray examinations, including dose scores of approximately 50 and lower, suggesting the possibility of long-term adverse health effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parveen Bhatti
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yong LC, Sigurdson AJ, Ward EM, Waters MA, Whelan EA, Petersen MR, Bhatti P, Ramsey MJ, Ron E, Tucker JD. Increased frequency of chromosome translocations in airline pilots with long-term flying experience. Occup Environ Med 2008; 66:56-62. [PMID: 19074211 DOI: 10.1136/oem.2008.038901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chromosome translocations are an established biomarker of cumulative exposure to external ionising radiation. Airline pilots are exposed to cosmic ionising radiation, but few flight crew studies have examined translocations in relation to flight experience. METHODS We determined the frequency of translocations in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of 83 airline pilots and 50 comparison subjects (mean age 47 and 46 years, respectively). Translocations were scored in an average of 1039 cell equivalents (CE) per subject using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) whole chromosome painting and expressed per 100 CE. Negative binomial regression models were used to assess the relationship between translocation frequency and exposure status and flight years, adjusting for age, diagnostic x ray procedures, and military flying. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the adjusted mean translocation frequency of pilots and comparison subjects (0.37 (SE 0.04) vs 0.38 (SE 0.06) translocations/100 CE, respectively). However, among pilots, the adjusted translocation frequency was significantly associated with flight years (p = 0.01) with rate ratios of 1.06 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.11) and 1.81 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.82) for a 1- and 10-year incremental increase in flight years, respectively. The adjusted rate ratio for pilots in the highest compared to the lowest quartile of flight years was 2.59 (95% CI 1.26 to 5.33). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggests that pilots with long-term flying experience may be exposed to biologically significant doses of ionising radiation. Epidemiological studies with longer follow-up of larger cohorts of pilots with a wide range of radiation exposure levels are needed to clarify the relationship between cosmic radiation exposure and cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L C Yong
- Industrywide Studies Branch, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, R-15, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sigurdson AJ, Bhatti P, Preston DL, Doody MM, Kampa D, Alexander BH, Petibone D, Yong LC, Edwards AA, Ron E, Tucker JD. Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists. Cancer Res 2008; 68:8825-31. [PMID: 18974125 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The U.S. population has nearly one radiographic examination per person per year, and concern about cancer risks associated with medical radiation has increased. Radiologic technologists were surveyed to determine whether their personal cumulative exposure to diagnostic X-rays was associated with increased frequencies of chromosome translocations, an established radiation biomarker and possible intermediary suggesting increased cancer risk. Within a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists, 150 provided a blood sample for whole chromosome painting and were interviewed about past X-ray examinations. The number and types of examinations reported were converted to a red bone marrow (RBM) dose score with units that approximated 1 mGy. The relationship between dose score and chromosome translocation frequency was assessed using Poisson regression. The estimated mean cumulative RBM radiation dose score was 49 (range, 0-303). After adjustment for age, translocation frequencies significantly increased with increasing RBM dose score with an estimate of 0.004 translocations per 100 cell equivalents per score unit (95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.007; P < 0.001). Removing extreme values or adjustment for gender, cigarette smoking, occupational radiation dose, allowing practice X-rays while training, work with radioisotopes, and radiotherapy for benign conditions did not affect the estimate. Cumulative radiation exposure from routine X-ray examinations was associated independently with increased chromosome damage, suggesting the possibility of elevated long-term health risks, including cancer. The slope estimate was consistent with expectation based on cytogenetic experience and atomic bomb survivor data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice J Sigurdson
- Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bhatti P, Doody MM, Preston DL, Kampa D, Ron E, Weinstock RW, Simon S, Edwards AA, Sigurdson AJ. Increased frequency of chromosome translocations associated with diagnostic x-ray examinations. Radiat Res 2008; 170:149-55. [PMID: 18666821 DOI: 10.1667/rr1422.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2008] [Accepted: 04/30/2008] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Informative studies of cancer risks associated with medical radiation are difficult to conduct owing to low radiation doses, poor recall of diagnostic X rays, and long intervals before cancers occur. Chromosome aberrations have been associated with increased cancer risk and translocations are a known radiation biomarker. Seventy-nine U.S. radiologic technologists were selected for blood collection, and translocations were enumerated by whole chromosome painting. We developed a dose score to the red bone marrow for medical radiation exposure from X-ray examinations reported by the technologists that they received as patients. Using Poisson regression, we analyzed translocations in relation to the dose scores. Each dose score unit approximated 1 mGy. The estimated mean cumulative red bone marrow radiation dose score was 42 (range 1-265). After adjustment for age, occupational radiation, and radiotherapy for benign conditions, translocation frequencies significantly increased with increasing red bone marrow dose score with an estimate of 0.007 translocations per 100 CEs per score unit (95% CI, 0.002 to 0.013; P = 0.01). Chromosome damage has been linked with elevated cancer risk, and we found that cumulative radiation exposure from medical X-ray examinations was associated with increased numbers of chromosome translocations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parveen Bhatti
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology 2007; 246:434-43. [PMID: 18056857 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2462070256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To prospectively determine the radiation dose to the organs of the body during standard bilateral two-view mammography by using Monte Carlo simulations and a phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS A modified version of the Cristy mathematic anthropomorphic phantom was implemented in the Geant4 Monte Carlo tool kit to simulate the conditions present in screen-film and digital mammography. The breast was simulated with compression in both the craniocaudal and the mediolateral oblique views. X-rays were tracked from the source until their absorption in the body or in the detector or their exit from the simulation limits, with recording of all the intermediate interactions in the body. The simulation was performed with x-rays of energy ranging from 6 to 35 keV to obtain results for clinically relevant spectra. The ratio of dose to an organ in the body per unit glandular dose to the breast, denoted the relative organ dose (ROD), was computed. The effect of using a body protective shield was also investigated. RESULTS The organs that received an ROD of 0.10% or higher in at least one view and one spectrum were the contralateral breast, ipsilateral eye and eye lens, heart, ipsilateral lung, and thymus. Among the organs, the maximum ROD was 0.62%. The maximum ROD for the bone surfaces was 2.36% and that for the red bone marrow was 0.56%. The highest ROD measured for the uterus or fetus at the first trimester was less than 10(-5). CONCLUSION The radiation dose to all tissues other than the breast is extremely low. The dose to the first-trimester fetus is minimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Sechopoulos
- Department of Radiology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bhatti P, Preston DL, Doody MM, Hauptmann M, Kampa D, Alexander BH, Petibone D, Simon SL, Weinstock RM, Bouville A, Yong LC, Freedman DM, Mabuchi K, Linet MS, Edwards AA, Tucker JD, Sigurdson AJ. Retrospective biodosimetry among United States radiologic technologists. Radiat Res 2007; 167:727-34. [PMID: 17523852 DOI: 10.1667/rr0894.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2006] [Accepted: 01/31/2007] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Measurement of chromosome translocations in peripheral blood lymphocytes has been used to quantify prior exposure to ionizing radiation, including for workers exposed to low, chronic doses. We assessed translocation frequencies in a subset of U.S. radiologic technologists to substantiate ionizing radiation dose estimates developed for 110,418 technologists who worked between 1916 and 1984. From 3,441 cohort members known to have begun working before 1950, we selected a sample of 152, stratified by estimated cumulative dose, over-sampling from higher-dose categories and excluding persons with a prior cancer diagnosis, a personal or family history of chromosomal instability disorders, or a current history of smoking. Estimates of film-badge dose ranged from less than 10 cSv to more than 30 cSv. Blood samples, obtained in 2004, were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) whole chromosome painting by simultaneously labeling chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 in red and 3, 5 and 6 in green. Translocations were scored in 1800 well-spread metaphase cells and expressed per 100 cell equivalents (CE) per person. Linear Poisson regression models with allowance for overdispersion were used to assess the relationship between estimated occupational red bone marrow absorbed dose in cGy and translocation frequency, adjusted for age, gender and estimated red bone marrow absorbed dose score from personal diagnostic procedures. We observed 0.09 excess translocations per 100 CE per cGy red bone marrow dose (95% CI: -0.01, 0.2; P = 0.07), which is similar to the expected estimate based on previous cytogenetic studies (0.05 excess translocations per 100 CE per cGy). Despite uncertainty in the estimates of occupational red bone marrow absorbed doses, we found good general agreement between the doses and translocation frequencies, lending support to the credibility of the dose assessment for this large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parveen Bhatti
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
von Boetticher H, Hoffmann W. A model and reference data for retrospective dose assessment of organ doses (red bone marrow, lymphatic system) in diagnostic radiography and nuclear medicine, 1946-1995. HEALTH PHYSICS 2007; 92:315-31. [PMID: 17351496 DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000248478.18931.2d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Retrospective dosimetry for radiologic and nuclear medicine examinations has been a challenge both for individual patients and in epidemiologic studies. Methodological problems include the large range of patient exposures from radiologic examinations, which spans over three orders of magnitude, the considerable dose reduction over time for most types of examinations due to technical advancements, and the increasing concern for radiation protection and quality issues in radiologic practice. A three-step model for retrospective dosimetry for patient exposure is presented that allows determination of organ doses to the red bone marrow and the lymphatic tissue, respectively, for typical examinations over the time period 1946-1995. The model starts from a set of doses assuming ideal technical equipment and radiologic practice. Step II considers the advancement of technical equipment over the different decades since the introduction of medical radiology in the early 1940's. Step III refers to quality in radiologic routine and allows for adjustment for less-than-ideal standards of radiologic practice. Model parameters are derived from contemporary literature and a multitude of historical sources. Tables with reference data are provided that allow a straightforward application of the model in the context of analytic epidemiologic studies. Wherever possible, reference doses are based on dose area product to allow for easy adjustment to different settings and inclusion of prospective data. The model and the results can be readily extended to different countries with different technical advancement and standard of radiologic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H von Boetticher
- Institute for Radiology, Klinikum Links der Weser, Bremen, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pogoda JM, Katz J, McKean-Cowdin R, Nichols PW, Ross RK, Preston-Martin S. Prescription drug use and risk of acute myeloid leukemia by French-American-British subtype: results from a Los Angeles County case-control study. Int J Cancer 2005; 114:634-8. [PMID: 15609330 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Chemotherapy is a well-established risk factor for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but little is known about other prescription drugs and AML risk. We report data from a population-based Los Angeles County study in which 299 matched case-control pairs had complete data on prescription drug use and 88% of cases were subtyped according to the French-American-British (FAB) criteria. Cases were diagnosed between 1987 and 1994. Prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use for at least 4 weeks in the 2 to 10 years before diagnosis was associated with decreased risk (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval=0.3, 1.0; p=0.04) with dose-response most evident for FAB subtype M2 (OR = 0.6, CI: 0.1, 2.9 for duration < or =6 months; OR = 0.2, CI: 0.0, 1.6 for >6 months). For subtype M4, ORs increased with increasing duration of benzodiazepine use in the 2 to 10 years before diagnosis (OR = 1.5, CI: 0.3, 9.0 for < or =6 months vs. OR = 5.0, CI: 0.6, 42.8 for >6 months). These results suggest that prescription drugs other than chemotherapy may have FAB subtype-specific effects on AML risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice M Pogoda
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Department of Preventive Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Daniels RD, Kubale TL, Spitz HB. Radiation exposure from work-related medical X-rays at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard. Am J Ind Med 2005; 47:206-16. [PMID: 15712259 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous analyses suggest that worker radiation dose may be significantly increased by routine occupational X-ray examinations. Medical exposures are investigated for 570 civilian workers employed at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNS) at Kittery, Maine. The research objective was to determine the radiation exposure contribution of work-related chest X-rays (WRX) relative to conventional workplace radiation sources. METHODS Methods were developed to estimate absorbed doses to the active (hematopoietic) bone marrow from X-ray examinations and workplace exposures using data extracted from worker dosimetry records (8,468) and health records (2,453). Dose distributions were examined for radiation and non-radiation workers. RESULTS Photofluorographic chest examinations resulted in 82% of the dose from medical sources. Radiation workers received 26% of their collective dose from WRX and received 66% more WRX exposure than non-radiation workers. CONCLUSIONS WRX can result in a significant fraction of the total dose, especially for radiation workers who were more likely to be subjected to routine medical monitoring. Omission of WRX from the total dose is a likely source of bias that can lead to dose category misclassification and may skew the epidemiologic dose-response assessment for cancers induced by the workplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert D Daniels
- Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|