A double-blind study of adjunctive sertraline in haloperidol-stabilized patients with chronic schizophrenia

Sense and non-sense of polypharmacy: increasing efficacy, decreasing compliance?

The objective in managing patients with schizophrenia is to provide effective control of symptoms and enable the patient to reintegrate into society. Pharmacotherapy should, therefore, aim to provide optimum symptom control with minimal side effects using a simple dosage regimen. Ideally, this would be achieved through the use of a single agent. Some patients are successfully managed with a single antipsychotic drug, but it is often necessary or thought to be necessary to use a combination of agents to provide effective treatment. One European survey reported that most patients receive two to three psychotropic agents on average, but at least 5-22% receive five or more agents [53]. Unfortunately, the addition of more agents increases the risk of drug interactions, adverse events and non-compliance. This is amplified by the paucity of evidence-based medicine currently available to guide physicians in the use of combinations of agents, and the tendency of polypharmaceutical practice to be mostly driven by personal preference, clinical experience and marketing. This article therefore briefly looks at the feasibility of using various drug classes as adjunctive therapy in patients with schizophrenia.

Efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation of continued antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressant augmentation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia.

METHODS

Systematic literature search (PubMed/MEDLINE/PsycINFO/Cochrane Library) from database inception until 10/10/2017 for randomized, double-blind, efficacy-focused trials comparing adjunctive antidepressants vs. placebo in schizophrenia.

RESULTS

In a random-effects meta-analysis (studies = 42, n = 1934, duration = 10.1 ± 8.1 weeks), antidepressant augmentation outperformed placebo regarding total symptom reduction [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.57 to -0.17, P < 0.001], driven by negative (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI = -0.44-0.06, P = 0.010), but not positive (P = 0.190) or general (P = 0.089) symptom reduction. Superiority regarding negative symptoms was confirmed in studies augmenting first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) (SMD = -0.42, 95% CI = -0.77, -0.07, P = 0.019), but not second-generation antipsychotics (P = 0.144). Uniquely, superiority in total symptom reduction by NaSSAs (SMD = -0.71, 95% CI = -1.21, -0.20, P = 0.006) was not driven by negative (P = 0.438), but by positive symptom reduction (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI = -0.77, -0.09, P = 0.012). Antidepressants did not improve depressive symptoms more than placebo (P = 0.185). Except for more dry mouth [risk ratio (RR) = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.04-2.36, P = 0.03], antidepressant augmentation was not associated with more adverse events or all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

For schizophrenia patients on stable antipsychotic treatment, adjunctive antidepressants are effective for total and particularly negative symptom reduction. However, effects are small-to-medium, differ across antidepressants, and negative symptom improvement seems restricted to the augmentation of FGAs.

Treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia and complex mental health needs - A national clinical guideline

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The Danish Health and Medicines Authority assembled a group of experts to develop a national clinical guideline for patients with schizophrenia and complex mental health needs. Within this context, ten explicit review questions were formulated, covering several identified key issues.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed stepwise for each review question to identify relevant guidelines, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. The quality of the body of evidence for each review question was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Clinical recommendations were developed on the basis of the evidence, assessment of the risk-benefit ratio, and perceived patient preferences.

RESULTS

Based on the identified evidence, a guideline development group (GDG) recommended that the following interventions should be offered routinely: antipsychotic maintenance therapy, family intervention and assertive community treatment. The following interventions should be considered: long-acting injectable antipsychotics, neurocognitive training, social cognitive training, cognitive behavioural therapy for persistent positive and/or negative symptoms, and the combination of cognitive behavioural therapy and motivational interviewing for cannabis and/or central stimulant abuse. SSRI or SNRI add-on treatment for persistent negative symptoms should be used only cautiously. Where no evidence was available, the GDG agreed on a good practice recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of this guideline in daily clinical practice can facilitate good treatment outcomes within the population of patients with schizophrenia and complex mental health needs. The guideline does not cover all available interventions and should be used in conjunction with other relevant guidelines.

Randomized Controlled Trials of Add-On Antidepressants in Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Despite adequate treatment with antipsychotics, a substantial number of patients with schizophrenia demonstrate only suboptimal clinical outcome. To overcome this challenge, various psychopharmacological combination strategies have been used, including antidepressants added to antipsychotics.

METHODS

To analyze the efficacy of add-on antidepressants for the treatment of negative, positive, cognitive, depressive, and antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal symptoms in schizophrenia, published randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of adjunctive antidepressants in schizophrenia were reviewed using the following parameters: baseline clinical characteristics and number of patients, their on-going antipsychotic treatment, dosage of the add-on antidepressants, duration of the trial, efficacy measures, and outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 36 randomized controlled trials reported in 41 journal publications (n=1582). The antidepressants used were the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, duloxetine, imipramine, mianserin, mirtazapine, nefazodone, reboxetin, trazodone, and bupropion. Mirtazapine and mianserin showed somewhat consistent efficacy for negative symptoms and both seemed to enhance neurocognition. Trazodone and nefazodone appeared to improve the antipsychotics-induced extrapyramidal symptoms. Imipramine and duloxetine tended to improve depressive symptoms. No clear evidence supporting selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors' efficacy on any clinical domain of schizophrenia was found. Add-on antidepressants did not worsen psychosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a substantial number of randomized controlled trials, the overall efficacy of add-on antidepressants in schizophrenia remains uncertain mainly due to methodological issues. Some differences in efficacy on several schizophrenia domains seem, however, to exist and to vary by the antidepressant subgroups--plausibly due to differences in the mechanisms of action. Antidepressants may not worsen the course of psychosis. Better designed, larger, and longer randomized controlled trials are needed.

Role of Haloperidol in Palliative Medicine

Haloperidol is a butyrophenone neuroleptic agent characterized as a high-affinity dopamine antagonist, originally used for the treatment of schizophrenia. Awareness of the role dopamine plays in many symptoms in palliative care, such as nausea, vomiting, and delirium, has led to the use of dopamine antagonists such as haloperidol for the treatment of these symptoms in the palliative care setting. Listed as 1 of the 25 important drugs in palliative care, haloperidol can be administered by multiple routes and can be given without dose alteration in the setting of both renal and hepatic insufficiency. Haloperidol is extensively metabolized in the liver, with CYP3A4 the chief cytochrome oxidase responsible for metabolism. This article will review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and current uses of haloperidol in palliative medicine. There will be an examination of the evidence base for the use of haloperidol in palliative medicine.

Efficacy of antidepressants in treating the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia continues to be a major clinical issue.

AIMS

To analyse the efficacy of add-on antidepressants for the treatment of negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia.

METHOD

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of antidepressants and placebo on the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia, measured through standardised rating scales. Outcome was measured as standardised mean difference between end-of-trial and baseline scores of negative symptoms.

RESULTS

There were 23 trials from 22 publications (n = 819). The antidepressants involved were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mirtazapine, reboxetine, mianserin, trazodone and ritanserin; trials on other antidepressants were not available. The overall standardised mean difference was moderate (-0.48) in favour of antidepressants and subgroup analysis revealed significant responses for fluoxetine, trazodone and ritanserin.

CONCLUSIONS

Antidepressants along with antipsychotics are more effective in treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia than antipsychotics alone.

Escitalopram in the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Antidepressant medication treatment has been associated with improvement in negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of escitalopram for the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Under double-blind conditions, 40 patients with chronic schizophrenia were randomized to add-on treatment with escitalopram (up to 20mg) or placebo for 10weeks. The primary outcome measures were the scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-negative subscale and the Social Functioning Scale (SFS). Secondary outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-total and positive scales, the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). Of 40 patients, 36 completed the study and another 2 were excluded after 8weeks due to side effects. Thus, 38 patients (19 on both treatment arms) were considered in the efficacy analysis. The reduction in the PANSS negative subscale score was 5% for escitalopram and 10% for placebo (NS). There were no significant inter-group differences in primary and secondary endpoints. Escitalopram was well tolerated, but was not more effective than placebo in the treatment of negative symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Further work in this field is needed to determine whether some subgroups of patients with negative symptoms may nevertheless respond to antidepressant medications.

Mirtazapine add-on therapy in the treatment of schizophrenia with atypical antipsychotics: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Schizophrenia is a multifaceted illness with positive, negative and cognitive symptom domains. Standard treatments often focus on positive symptoms and may not adequately relieve other symptoms. Previous studies have suggested a role for mirtazapine in schizophrenia, particularly in negative symptoms. This study investigates the efficacy of adding mirtazapine to treatment as usual to alleviate the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

METHODS

In a 6 week, double-blind clinical trial, participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and currently being treated with atypical antipsychotic medication were randomised to adjunctive treatment with mirtazapine (30 mg/day) or placebo. The primary outcome measure was improvement in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Measures of cognition, collected at baseline and week 6 only, were analysed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model. All other outcome measures were analysed using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Forty participants were recruited to the study with equal numbers randomised to each treatment arm. There was no significant difference between mirtazapine and placebo treated participants for improvement in PANSS scores or any of the secondary outcome measures at any stage during the 6-week trial.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial does not confirm previous research supporting the use of mirtazapine adjunctive to atypical antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia.

Clozapine and co-prescribed psychotropics: a short report

Clozapine is the drug of choice in treatment resistant schizophrenia. It reduces hospitalizations. Patients on clozapine are often co-prescribed other psychotropics. This report looks at a sample of twenty patients on clozapine. It finds that almost two thirds were on a psychotropic along with clozapine. Eight individuals were on an antidepressant; seven on an antipsychotic and five were on co-prescribed valproate. The clinical implications are discussed and a need to look at health services involving clozapine is suggested.

On the relationship of atypical and low-dose conventional antipsychotics with akathisia in a clinical patient population

Metabolic side-effects of atypical antipsychotics have led to concern about their relative safety compared with low doses of conventional neuroleptics. Akathisia is an often misdiagnosed side-effect, which leads to non-compliance and sometimes even exacerbation of psychosis or suicidal behaviour. In fact, little is known about the differences between antipsychotic drugs in clinical practice, since only as few as 20% of patients may be eligible for studies comparing antipsychotic medications with each other. The aim of this study was to find out if the use of conventional antipsychotics is associated with an increased risk of akathisia (compared with atypical antipsychotics) even when low doses of conventional antipsychotics are used. The Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale was used to evaluate akathisia in 100 outpatients on antipsychotic medication. Conventional antipsychotics were associated with an increased risk of akathisia compared with atypical antipsychotics, although the chlorpromazine equivalent doses of conventional antipsychotics were lower than those of the atypicals. An additional akathisia-provoking effect of SSRIs could not be ruled out. The results suggest favouring atypical antipsychotic medication in patients who may easily develop akathisia.

The pharmacological importance of cytochrome CYP3A4 in the palliation of symptoms: review and recommendations for avoiding adverse drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug interactions are major causes of morbidity, hospitalizations, and mortality. The greatest risk of drug interactions occurs through in the cytochrome system. CYP3A4, the most prevalent cytochrome, accounts for 30-50% of drugs metabolized through type I enzymes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Palliative patients received medications for symptoms and co-morbidities, many of which are substrate, inhibitors, or promoters of CYP3A4 activity and expression. A literature review on CYP3A4 was performed pertinent to palliative medicine.

DISCUSSION

In this state of the art review, we discuss the CYP3A4 genetics, and kinetics and common medications, which are substrates or inhibitor/promoters of CYP3A4.

CONCLUSION

We made some recommendations for drug choices to avoid clinically important drug interaction.

Pharmacological treatment of primary negative symptoms in schizophrenia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of primary negative symptoms is important because their presence is associated with poor outcome.

AIMS

To systematically review all studies dealing with the efficacy of pharmacological agents on primary negative symptoms.

METHOD

A comprehensive search of the relevant literature was undertaken using electronic database, reference lists and personal contact.

RESULTS

There is a lack of standardized research designs. Amisulpride is the most extensively studied drug with respect to efficacy against primary negative symptoms. At low doses it demonstrates a consistent, modest effect compared to placebo, though not to conventional antipsychotics and has yet to be tested against other atypicals. Evidence from multiple studies that used simple statistical analyses and inclusion criteria for patients with primary negative symptoms does not support a direct effect for clozapine. Path-analysis studies support the direct effects of risperidone, olanzapine, sertindole and aripiprazole, however, different statistical analyses of the same risperidone study produced conflicting results and the direct effects of olanzapine were not confirmed in selected patients with primary negative symptoms. There are no studies supporting the use of ziprasidone or quetiapine. The effects of typical antipsychotics on primary negative symptoms are inconclusive and likely to depend on drug dosages. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), mirtazepine and NMDA agonists show early promise but require further study. Novel agents such as selegiline, naltrexone, dehydroepiandrosterone, galantamine, Ginkgo, nitric oxide, L-deprenyl and pergolide show positive effects on general negative symptoms but remain untested against primary negative symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies using standardized selective inclusion criteria and controlling for chronicity are needed. Research guidelines are discussed.

Antidepressants for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Negative symptoms are common in people with schizophrenia and are often difficult to treat with antipsychotic drugs. Treatment often involves the use of various add-on medications such as antidepressants.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effects of the combination of antipsychotic and antidepressant drug treatment for management of negative symptoms in schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (January 2004). We also contacted authors of included studies in order to identify further trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials comparing antipsychotic and antidepressant combinations with antipsychotics alone for the treatment of prominent negative symptoms in schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychoses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Working independently, we selected and critically appraised studies, extracted data and analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Where possible and appropriate we calculated the relative risk RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI), with the number needed to treat (NNT).

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies (all short-term, total N=190). We found no significant difference for 'leaving the study early for any reason' between the antipsychotic plus antidepressant combination and the control group (n=90, 3 RCTs, RR 3.0 CI 0.35 to 26.04). Leaving early due to adverse events (n=64, 2 RCTs, RR 5.0 CI 0.26 to 97.0) and leaving the study early due to inefficacy (n=34, 1 RCT, RR 3.0 CI 0.13 to 68.84) also showed no significant difference between the two treatment groups. In terms of clinical response, participants treated with the antipsychotic plus antidepressant medications showed a statistically significant greater improvement (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -1.0 CI -1.61 to -0.39) and showed a significantly lower severity at endpoint (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -0.9 CI -1.55 to -0.25) on the Clinical Global Impression Scale than those treated with antipsychotics alone. More people allocated to combination therapy had a clinically significant improvement in negative symptoms compared with those given antipsychotics and placebo (n=60, 2 RCTs, RR 0.56 CI 0.32 to 0.97, NNT 3 CI 3 to 34). Significant differences in favour of the combination therapy were seen in different aspects of negative symptoms: 'affective flattening' (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -7.0 CI -10.37 to -3.63), 'alogia' (n=26, 1 RCT, WMD -3.00 CI -5.14 to -0.86) and 'avolition' (n=30, 1 RCT, WMD -3.0 CI -5.04 to -0.96). No statistically significant difference was found between treatment groups in regards to the outcome 'at least one adverse event' (n=84, 2 RCTs, RR 1.80 CI 0.66 to 4.90). For movement disorders and other adverse effects, no statistically significant differences were found in any of the studies that provided usable data on these outcomes. There are no data at all on outcomes such as compliance, cost, social and cognitive functioning, relapse, recurrence of negative symptoms, rehospitalisation or quality of life. There are no medium or long term data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The combination of antipsychotics and antidepressants may be effective in treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia, but the amount of information is currently too limited to allow any firm conclusions. Large, pragmatic, well-designed and reported long term trials are justified.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia

These guidelines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This second part of the guidelines covers the long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Intérêt des antidépresseurs chez le patient schizophrène présentant un syndrome dépressif

INTRODUCTION

Depression is common in people with schizophrenia and is associated with substantial morbidity explaining also the considerable attention and recognition of this entity as suggested by the inclusion of the post-psychotic depression in DSM IV and ICD 10. The prevalence of this disorder varies according to the type of approach used (range between 7% to 75%). Prescription of antidepressants plus antipsychotic treatment is frequent in clinical practice (11 to 43%).

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic and metabolic interactions have been identified. The cytochrome P450 has been identified as being implicated in the metabolism of most psychotropics, mainly through the CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 isoenzymes. Tricyclic antidepressants are likely to increase chlorpromazine plasma levels. Similarly, antipsychotics such as perphenazine, chlorpromazine or haloperidol can increase antidepressant plasma levels, through the inhibition of CYP 450 isoenzymes (CYP2D6). Most of the Specific Serotonin Recapture Inhibitors (SSRIs) are likely to inhibit one or several CYP450 isoenzymes. The inhibition is moderate to marked for CYP1A2 (fluvoxamine and fluoxetine), CYP2C19 (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline), CYP2D6 (paroxetine, fluoxetine and sertraline), and CYP3A4 (fluvoxamine, fluoxetine and sertraline). In the US, one-fourth of psychiatrists report the use of depression-rating scales in schizophrenic patients. Non specific scales (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or Beck Depression Inventory) are the most commonly used in spite of the fact that these scales do not allow the distinction of depressive from negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients.

LITERATURE FINDINGS

Due to these limitations, more specific assessment tools for depressive symptoms in schizophrenia are required. Two specific scales for assessing depressive symptoms in schizophrenic patients have been constructed and validated. The Calgary Depression Scale (CDS) is a nine item scale, each item scored from 0 to 3. This scale was derived from the HDRS and the Present State Examination. Factor analysis showed that the CDS is unidimensional, has high internal consistency, and significant strong correlation with scores on the HDRS, Beck and BPRS depression scales. The CDS has been validated in different languages (Brazilian, Danish, French...). It has been shown that there is no overlap between negative or extrapyramidal and depressive symptoms assessed by the PDS in schizophrenic patients. The Psychotic Depression Scale (PDS) is a 32 item scale derived from the HDRS, PANSS, CPRS and AMDP, each item being rated from 0 to 7. A principal component analysis of the PDS items using a Varimax rotation disclosed 8 orthogonal components that account for 71% of the variance. These components involved the following dimensions : depressive mood, inhibition, vegetative signs, paranoid signs, strangeness of thought, inverse vegetative signs, guilt feelings and cognitive signs. The analysis revealed that the 'depressive mood' factor of the PDS was correlated with the 'depressive' factor and was slightly correlated with the cognitive factor of the PANSS. This first factor was not correlated with either the "negative" factor of the PANSS, or the Positive or Excitement factor of the PANSS. Hence, this PDS, factor distinguished depressive signs from negative symptoms. Due to their metrologic properties, specific scales should be preferred. However, only one open trial (of an antipsychotic) and two double blind controlled trials (one comparison of 2 antipsychotics and one comparison of an cholinesterase inhibitor versus placebo) have been published using the CDS. Likewise, only one double blind controlled trial using the PDS (comparison of 2 antipsychotics) has been published. No study of the effect of antidepressants in depressed schizophrenic patients has been published, using either the CDS or the PDS assessment criteria.

DISCUSSION

These specific scales are rarely used in clinical practice. Only about 1% of the US psychiatrists reported the use of the Calgary Depression Scale. Several open clinical trials have assessed the efficacy of antidepressant agents added to antipsychotic in patients with schizophrenia. They have produced inconsistent results but have suffered from methodological limits (short duration of the studies, non homogeneous inclusion criteria, heterogeneous assessment methods...). Due to the lack of a reference drug, double blind placebo-controlled trial are necessary. A recent meta-analysis has been performed on results of trials that have investigated the clinical efficacy of antidepressant medication (either tricyclics, SSRIs or others) in the treatment of depression in schizophrenic patients. In a subset of 5 trials (209 patients), the proportion improved in the antidepressant group was 26% (95% CI 10 to 42) higher than in the placebo group. The estimated number needed to treat was 4. In a subgroup of 6 studies (267 patients), the standardized mean difference on the HDRS score was -0.27 (95% CI - 0.7 to -0.2). There was no evidence that antidepressant treatment induced a deterioration of psychotic symptoms in these trials.

CONCLUSION

The results provide weak evidence for the efficacy of antidepressants in patients with schizophrenia and depression. Today, the only SSRI tested in the treatment of depression in schizophrenic patients is sertraline. One study led to positive results. Since the meta-analysis, one additional study has been performed comparing sertraline to placebo. No difference between the 2 treatment groups was demonstrated but the power of the trial was rather low. Further research is required to determine the best approach towards treating depression in patients with schizophrenia, with clinical trials performed for longer periods, using appropriate assessment criteria such as depressive symptoms and quality of life.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, Part 1: acute treatment of schizophrenia

These guide lines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBO). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of schizophrenia, as well as the management of the acute phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Antidepressants as add-on treatment to antipsychotics for people with schizophrenia and pronounced negative symptoms: a systematic review of randomized trials

The aim of our meta-analysis was to review the evidence base for the efficacy and safety of antipsychotic and antidepressant combinations in the treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses. Randomized controlled trials comparing the combination of antidepressants and antipsychotics with antipsychotics alone for patients with pronounced negative symptoms in schizophrenia were searched for by accessing the register of randomized controlled trials of the Cochrane Schizophrenia group. The studies identified were independently inspected and their quality assessed by two reviewers. The principal outcome of interest was the reduction of negative symptoms. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the relative risk and continuous data were analyzed using standardized mean differences, both specified with 95% confidence intervals. It was possible to include seven trials (n = 202) examining antidepressants as add-on to antipsychotics in this review. Except for one study, all included studies used first generation antipsychotics. While there was often merely a trend in favour of augmentation of antipsychotics with antidepressants in the small single studies, the meta-analytic combination resulted in a statistically significant superiority in the outcome reduction of negative symptoms as a whole. Statistically significant differences between groups in terms of specific subscores of the SANS were found, but the results were inconsistent. The combination of antipsychotics and antidepressants may be more effective in treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia than antipsychotics alone, but this finding needs to be corroborated by further large trials.

Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor augmentation in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia

Negative symptoms are core features of schizophrenia that respond poorly to first-generation antipsychotics and present a major obstacle in rehabilitation. Patients may be somewhat more responsive to clozapine and second-generation antipsychotics but even then, considerable impairment remains. This paper reviews the use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) augmentation of antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues particular to the study of negative symptoms are also discussed. Current evidence indicates that at least two SSRIs, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, can ameliorate primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenic patients treated with first-generation antipsychotics. Onset of improvement may be detected within 2 weeks of starting treatment. The combination is well-tolerated, although as antipsychotic drug concentrations may rise, close monitoring of drug doses and possibly drug concentrations is needed. So far, evidence regarding SSRI augmentation of second-generation antipsychotics is limited and in view of the increasing use of these newer agents, controlled studies are urgently needed. SSRI augmentation may be a useful addition to the treatment of schizophrenic patients with persistent negative symptoms. The paradoxical findings that both clozapine, a serotonin antagonist, and an SSRI antidepressant added to antipsychotics, can improve negative symptoms suggests that these pharmacologically distinct treatments may share common final mechanisms. A better understanding of these mechanisms can shed light on the pathogenesis of negative symptoms and provide new targets for drug development.

Combination treatments for schizophrenia

Combination treatments, especially combinations of antipsychotics, are used frequently for schizophrenia, despite a paucity of evidence regarding their safety and efficacy. Because the literature basis is weak and expert recommendations are largely lacking, providers should be vigilant in documenting improved outcomes for patients thought to benefit from combination treatments. Target symptoms that have been studied include psychosis, cognitive deficits, and negative symptoms. The strongest evidence is for augmentation of clozapine with another antipsychotic or with electroconvulsive therapy for persistent positive symptoms. Combination treatments for cognitive deficits and negative symptoms are being actively investigated, but current evidence is insufficient to recommend available agents for these components of schizophrenia. It is important that appropriate monotherapies be given adequate trials before resorting to combination therapies.

Evidence-based treatment for schizophrenia

Taken together, the research on what treatments help people with schizophrenia point to the value of treatment programs that combine medications with a range of psychosocial services. Provision of such packages of services likely reduces the need for crisis-oriented care hospitalizations and emergency room visits and enables greater recovery. For most people with schizophrenia, the combination of psychopharmacological and psychosocial interventions improves outcomes. Several psychosocial treatments have demonstrated efficacy. These include family intervention, supported employment, assertive community treatment, skills training, and CBT. In the same way that psychopharmacologic management must be tailored individually to the needs and preferences of the patient, so too should the selection of psychosocial treatments. At the very least, all people with schizophrenia should be provided with education about their illness. Beyond illness education, all of the recommended psychosocial interventions would be used rarely during any one phase of illness for an individual. Some psychosocial treatments share treatment components, and patients have different clinical and social needs at different points in their illness course. Knowledge regarding how best to combine treatments to optimize outcomes is scarce.

Management of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: new treatment options

This article presents a systematic review of pharmacological treatment for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, based on MEDLINE searches from 1995 to September 2002 to identify pertinent clinical trials. The pharmacotherapy of negative symptoms in schizophrenia includes novel/atypical antipsychotics and classical antipsychotics, as well as antidepressants, glutamatergic compounds, antiepileptic drugs and estrogens. In the assessment of therapy for negative symptoms of schizophrenia, it is imperative that better studies of sound methodology are performed. In such studies, some important aspects to be considered include an accurate definition and assessment of negative symptoms (including well designed, valid and reliable rating scales), the differentiation between primary and secondary negative symptoms, an appropriate selection of standard comparators, adequate dosages of comparators (e.g. haloperidol dosages) and an overall optimal study design. Most of the available studies on treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia have focused on the atypical antipsychotics, while other potential candidates, mostly in the context of add-on therapy, have not been so intensively investigated. Atypical antipsychotics have been proven in placebo-controlled trials to be effective in treating negative symptoms of acute schizophrenic episodes. In many of the comparator studies, they showed efficacy in treating negative symptoms that was superior to that of typical antipsychotics. Data on stable, predominant negative symptoms in subchronic or chronic cases of schizophrenia, although limited, have demonstrated the efficacy of atypical antipsychotics. If the beneficial tolerability profile with respect to extrapyramidal symptoms is also taken into account during clinical decision making, the atypical antipsychotics should be preferred for the treatment of negative symptoms. It is also worth noting that the traditional antipsychotics have the risk of inducing negative symptoms in the context of akinesia. The benefits of add-on therapy with SSRIs or a glutamatergic compound are well documented. Estrogen add-on therapy seems promising. Other traditionally suggested approaches, such as comedication with an antiepileptic drug, lithium or beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, cannot generally be recommended on the basis of the available data.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor augmentation in the treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia

The treatment of negative symptoms of schizophrenia presents a major clinical challenge. This review examines the evidence pertaining to the efficacy, tolerability and safety of adding selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to antipsychotic agents in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues such as differentiating primary and secondary negative symptoms are discussed. The balance of available evidence indicates that at least some SSRIs, fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, can ameliorate primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia patients who are treated with typical antipsychotics. The combination is safe and well tolerated although, as antipsychotic drug concentrations may be elevated, attention to dose and drug monitoring should be considered as appropriate. The effect of SSRI augmentation of atypical antipsychotics requires further study. Combination with clozapine may require particular caution because of potential toxicity if serum clozapine levels rise steeply. SSRI augmentation may be a useful addition to the treatment of schizophrenia.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sertraline for depressive symptoms in patients with stable, chronic schizophrenia

There have been no studies specifically examining the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants for the symptoms of depression in schizophrenia. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of sertraline as a treatment for depressive symptoms in patients with stable, chronic schizophrenia. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used as the principal outcome measure and other measures of depressive symptoms as secondary outcome measures. Twenty-six patients were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial of sertraline and were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis (13 in each group). Eight patients in the sertraline group and 12 in the placebo group completed at least four weeks in the study and were considered to have had adequate treatment. On the ITT analysis, the mean score on the BDI fell 14.5% for the sertraline group and 5.6% for the placebo group (p > 0.05); the mean score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) fell 16.99% for the sertraline group and 8.3% for the placebo group (p > 0.05). When the analysis was repeated for those who had received adequate treatment, the mean BDI score fell by 28% for the sertraline group and 6% for the placebo group (p = 0.1); the mean HDRS score fell 31% for the sertraline group and 8.6% for the placebo group (p = 0.02). On the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale, 10 of the 13 patients on sertraline improved against four of the 13 in the placebo group (p = 0.05). Sertraline-treated patients showed a significant improvement on the anxiety/ depression subscale of the BPRS on ITT analysis (F = 10.1, p = 0.004). There was no significant effect on negative or positive symptoms. Sertraline was well tolerated. The results suggest that sertraline is useful as a treatment for depressive symptoms in schizophrenia.

Fluvoxamine augmentation in risperidone-resistant schizophrenia: an open trial

We investigated the efficacy and safety of augmenting risperidone with fluvoxamine for the treatment of residual positive and negative symptoms in patients with chronic schizophrenia who had shown an incomplete response to risperidone. A total of 30 patients completed the open trial over a 12-week period during which fluvoxamine was added to risperidone. The result from the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and Simpson-Angus extrapyramidal effects (S-A) scale were examined at baseline, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks of treatment. There were no significant differences in PANSS positive, negative and general psychopathology scores, or in S-A scale scores at any point during the treatment. These results suggest that fluvoxamine appears to be ineffective in augmenting the risperidone treatment response in chronic schizophrenic patients. Further controlled trials will be needed to confirm this observation.

Antidepressants for people with both schizophrenia and depression

BACKGROUND

Depressive symptoms, often of substantial severity, are found in 50% of newly diagnosed suffers of schizophrenia and 33% of people with chronic schizophrenia who have relapsed. Depression is associated with dysphoria, disability, reduction of motivation to accomplish tasks and the activities of daily living, an increased duration of illness and more frequent relapses.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical effects of antidepressant medication for the treatment of depression in people who also suffer with schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We undertook electronic searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (October 2000), ClinPsych (1988-2000), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2000), EMBASE (1980-2000) and MEDLINE (1966-2000). This was supplemented by citation searching, personal contact with authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials that compared antidepressant medication with placebo for people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were also suffering from depression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently selected and extracted. For homogeneous dichotomous data the fixed effects risk difference (RD), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, reviewers calculated weighted mean differences. Statistical tests for heterogeneity were also undertaken.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. All were small, and randomised fewer than 30 people to each group. Most included people after the most acute phase of psychosis and investigated a wide range of antidepressants. The quality of reporting varied a great deal. For the outcome of 'no important clinical response' antidepressants were significantly better than placebo (n=209, 5 RCTs, summary risk difference fixed effects -0.26, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.13, NNT 4 95% CI 3 to 8). The depression score at the end of the trial, as assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale (HAM-D), seemed to suggest that using antidepressants was beneficial, but this was only statistically significant when a fixed effects model was used (n=261, 6 RCTs, WMD fixed effects -2.2 95% CI -3.8 to -0.6; WMD random effects -2.1 95% CI -5.04 to 0.84). There was no evidence that antidepressant treatment led to a deterioration of psychotic symptoms in the included trials. Heterogeneous data on 'any adverse effect' are equivocal (n=110, 2 RCTs, RD fixed 0.11 CI -0.03 to 0.25, Chi square 7.5, df=1, p=0.0062). In one small study extrapyramidal adverse effects were reported less often by those allocated to antidepressant (n=52, 1 RCT, RD fixed -0.28 CI -0.5 to -0.04). Only about 10% of people left these studies by 12 weeks. There was no apparent difference between those allocated placebo and those given an antidepressant (n=426, 10 RCTs, RD fixed 0.04 CI -0.02 to 0.1).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the literature was of poor quality, and only a small number of trials made useful contributions. Though our results provide some evidence to indicate that antidepressants may be beneficial for people with depression and schizophrenia, the results, at best, are likely to overestimate the treatment effect, and, at worst, could merely reflect selective reporting of statistically significant results and publication bias. At present, there is no convincing evidence to support or refute the use of antidepressants in treating depression in people with schizophrenia. We need further well-designed, conducted and reported research to determine the best approach towards treating depression in people with schizophrenia.

Augmentation strategies in the treatment of schizophrenia

Use of augmenting agents in schizophrenia is a common practice in response to resistant symptoms or comorbid illness. Increasingly, clinicians are combining more than one antipsychotic agent, despite a lack of evidence from controlled studies to support this approach. A rationale can be made for adding higher-potency agents to clozapine in an attempt to optimize D2 dopamine receptor blockade, but this strategy requires further study before it should be adopted in clinical practice. Older reports have explored the use of antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and anxiolytics as augmenting agents. These agents appear to improve comorbid affective or anxiety symptoms, but earlier evidence of improvement in psychotic or negative symptoms has not been replicated consistently. Glutamatergic agents acting at the glycine coagonist site of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor, including glycine, d-cycloserine, and d-serine, have demonstrated impressive therapeutic effects for negative symptoms when added to conventional neuroleptic agents, but do not appear to enhance clozapine efficacy. Given the high rates of symptom persistence and disability associated with schizophrenia, the need for augmentation strategies is great, but no approach has clearly emerged as effective for a substantial portion of patients. Although certain approaches may prove helpful for individual patients, augmentation should not be used unless monotherapy has been optimized, and should not be continued long-term unless benefits are clear.

Fluvoxamine as an adjunctive agent in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a common mental disorder that has an early onset and rates high as a cause of medical disability. Antipsychotic agents are the mainstay of treatment but response is often inadequate. Negative symptoms (disturbances in volition, social interaction and affective functions) are particularly difficult to treat and form a major obstacle to rehabilitation. A promising approach to improve response of negative symptoms has been to add a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant to antipsychotic treatment. This review examines evidence pertaining to the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the SSRI fluvoxamine, combined with antipsychotic agents, in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Important methodological issues, such as differentiating primary and secondary negative symptoms, are discussed. The balance of available evidence indicates that fluvoxamine can improve primary negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenia patients treated with typical antipsychotics and suggests that it may also do so in some patients treated with clozapine. This combination is generally safe and well tolerated although, as antipsychotic drug concentrations may be elevated, attention to dose and drug monitoring should be considered appropriately. Combination with clozapine may require particular caution because of potential toxicity if serum clozapine levels rise steeply. The fluvoxamine doses effective in augmentation are lower than those usually used to treat depression. Evidence regarding the use of fluvoxamine augmentation to treat phenomena, such as obsessions and aggression, which may be associated with schizophrenia, is also examined. An important goal of future studies will be to define which patient groups can benefit from combined treatment.

Suicide and schizophrenia

Suicide and suicide attempts occur at a significantly greater rate in schizophrenia than in the general population. Common estimates are that 10% of people with schizophrenia will eventually have a completed suicide, and that attempts are made at two to five times that rate. Demographically associated with suicidality in schizophrenia are being young, being early in the course of the illness, being male, coming from a high socioeconomic family background, having high intelligence, having high expectations, not being married, lacking social supports, having awareness of symptoms, and being recently discharged from the hospital. Also associated are reduced self-esteem, stigma, recent loss or stress, hopelessness, isolation, treatment non-compliance and substance abuse. Clinically, the most common correlates of suicidality in schizophrenia are depressive symptoms and the depressive syndrome, although severe psychotic and panic-like symptoms may contribute as well. This review specifically explores the issue of depression in schizophrenia, in relation to suicide, by organizing the differential diagnosis of this state and highlighting their potentially treatable or correctable causes. This differential diagnosis includes both acute and chronic disappointment reactions, the prodrome of an acute psychotic episode, neuroleptic induced akinesia and akathisia, the possibility of direct neuroleptic-induced depression, negative symptoms of schizophrenia, and the possible co-occurrence of an independent depressive diathesis. The potential beneficial roles of 'atypical' antipsychotic agents, including both clozapine and more novel agents, and adjunctive treatment with other psychopharmacological medications are considered, and the important roles of psychosocial factors and interventions are recognized.

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline: its profile and use in psychiatric disorders

The naphthylamine derivative sertraline is a potent and selective inhibitor of serotonin reuptake into presynaptic terminals. Sertraline has a linear pharmacokinetic profile and a half-life of about 26 h. Its major metabolite, desmethylsertraline does not appear to inhibit serotonin reuptake. Sertraline mildly inhibits the CYP2D6 isoform of the cytochrome P450 system but has little effect on CYP1A2, CYP3A3/4, CYP2C9, or CYP2C19. It is, however, highly protein bound and may alter blood levels of other highly protein bound agents. Sertraline is a widely used serotonin reuptake inhibitor that has been shown to have both antidepressant and antianxiety effects. Many clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy in depression compared with both placebo and other antidepressant drugs. Its efficacy has also been demonstrated in randomized, controlled trials of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. In short-term, open-label studies it has appeared efficacious and tolerable in children and adolescents and in the elderly, and data are positive for its use in pregnant or lactating women. Typical side effects include gastrointestinal and central nervous system effects as well as treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction; withdrawal reactions may be associated with abrupt discontinuation of the agent. The safety profile of sertraline in overdose is very favorable. Sertraline's efficacy for both mood and anxiety disorders, relatively weak effect on the cytochrome P450 system, and tolerability profile and safety in overdose are factors that contribute to make it a first-line agent for treatment in both primary and tertiary care settings.

Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol: an update

Haloperidol is commonly used in the therapy of patients with acute and chronic schizophrenia. The enzymes involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol include cytochrome P450 (CYP), carbonyl reductase and uridine diphosphoglucose glucuronosyltransferase. The greatest proportion of the intrinsic hepatic clearance of haloperidol is by glucuronidation, followed by the reduction of haloperidol to reduced haloperidol and by CYP-mediated oxidation. In studies of CYP-mediated disposition in vitro, CYP3A4 appears to be the major isoform responsible for the metabolism of haloperidol in humans. The intrinsic clearances of the back-oxidation of reduced haloperidol to the parent compound, oxidative N-dealkylation and pyridinium formation are of the same order of magnitude, suggesting that the same enzyme system is responsible for the 3 reactions. Large variation in the catalytic activity was observed in the CYP-mediated reactions, whereas there appeared to be only small variations in the glucuronidation and carbonyl reduction pathways. Haloperidol is a substrate of CYP3A4 and an inhibitor, as well as a stimulator, of CYP2D6. Reduced haloperidol is also a substrate of CYP3A4 and inhibitor of CYP2D6. Pharmacokinetic interactions occur between haloperidol and various drugs given concomitantly, for example, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, nefazodone, venlafaxine, buspirone, alprazolam, rifampicin (rifampin), quinidine and carteolol. Overall, drug interaction studies have suggested that CYP3A4 is involved in the biotransformation of haloperidol in humans. Interactions of haloperidol with most drugs lead to only small changes in plasma haloperidol concentrations, suggesting that the interactions have little clinical significance. On the other hand, the coadministration of carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampicin or quinidine affects the pharmacokinetics of haloperidol to an extent that alterations in clinical consequences would be expected. In vivo pharmacogenetic studies have indicated that the metabolism and disposition of haloperidol may be regulated by genetically determined polymorphic CYP2D6 activity. However, these findings appear to contradict those from studies in vitro with human liver microsomes and from studies of drug interactions in vivo. Interethnic and pharmacogenetic differences in haloperidol metabolism may explain these observations.