Tamoxifen does not improve survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Tamoxifen for adults with hepatocellular carcinoma

RATIONALE

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of liver cancer, accounting for 70% to 85% of individuals with primary liver cancer. Tamoxifen has been evaluated in randomised clinical trials in people with hepatocellular cancer. The reported results have been inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of tamoxifen or tamoxifen plus any other anticancer drugs compared with no intervention, placebo, any type of standard care, or alternative treatment in adults with hepatocellular carcinoma, irrespective of sex, administered dose, type of formulation, and duration of treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, and major trials registries, and handsearched reference lists up to 26 March 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Parallel-group randomised clinical trials including adults (aged 18 years and above) diagnosed with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Had we found cross-over trials, we would have included only the first trial phase. We did not consider data from quasi-randomised trials for analysis.

OUTCOMES

Our critical outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and health-related quality of life. Our important outcomes were disease progression, and adverse events considered non-serious.

RISK OF BIAS

We assessed risk of bias using the RoB 2 tool.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We used standard Cochrane methods and Review Manager. We meta-analysed the outcome data at the longest follow-up. We presented the results of dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR) and continuous data as mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model. We summarised the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We included 10 trials that randomised 1715 participants with advanced, unresectable, or terminal stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Six were single-centre trials conducted in Hong Kong, Italy, and Spain, while three were conducted as multicentre trials in single countries (France, Italy, and Spain), and one trial was conducted in nine countries in the Asia-Pacific region (Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand). The experimental intervention was tamoxifen in all trials. The control interventions were no intervention (three trials), placebo (six trials), and symptomatic treatment (one trial). Co-interventions were best supportive care (three trials) and standard care (one trial). The remaining six trials did not provide this information. The number of participants in the trials ranged from 22 to 496 (median 99), mean age was 63.7 (standard deviation 4.18) years, and mean proportion of men was 74.7% (standard deviation 42%). Follow-up was three months to five years.

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Ten trials evaluated oral tamoxifen at five different dosages (ranging from 20 mg per day to 120 mg per day). All trials investigated one or more of our outcomes. We performed meta-analyses when at least two trials assessed similar types of tamoxifen versus similar control interventions. Eight trials evaluated all-cause mortality at varied follow-up points. Tamoxifen versus the control interventions (i.e. no treatment, placebo, and symptomatic treatment) results in little to no difference in mortality between one and five years (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.06; 8 trials, 1364 participants; low-certainty evidence). In total, 488/682 (71.5%) participants died in the tamoxifen groups versus 487/682 (71.4%) in the control groups. The separate analysis results for one, between two and three, and five years were comparable to the analysis result for all follow-up periods taken together. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tamoxifen versus no treatment on serious adverse events at one-year follow-up (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.06; 1 trial, 36 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 5/20 (25.0%) participants in the tamoxifen group versus 9/16 (56.3%) participants in the control group experienced serious adverse events. One trial measured health-related quality of life at baseline and at nine months' follow-up, using the Spitzer Quality of Life Index. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tamoxifen versus no treatment on health-related quality of life (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.51; 1 trial, 420 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A second trial found no appreciable difference in global health-related quality of life scores. No further data were provided. Tamoxifen versus control interventions (i.e. no treatment, placebo, or symptomatic treatment) results in little to no difference in disease progression between one and five years' follow-up (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.14; 4 trials, 720 participants; low-certainty evidence). A total of 191/358 (53.3%) participants in the tamoxifen group versus 198/362 (54.7%) participants in the control group had progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Tamoxifen versus control interventions (i.e. no treatment or placebo) may have little to no effect on adverse events considered non-serious during treatment, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.06; 4 trials, 462 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 10/265 (3.8%) participants in the tamoxifen group versus 6/197 (3.0%) participants in the control group had adverse events considered non-serious. We identified no trials with participants diagnosed with early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma. We identified no ongoing trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on the low- and very low-certainty evidence, the effects of tamoxifen on all-cause mortality, disease progression, serious adverse events, health-related quality of life, and adverse events considered non-serious in adults with advanced, unresectable, or terminal stage hepatocellular carcinoma when compared with no intervention, placebo, or symptomatic treatment could not be established. Our findings are mostly based on trials at high risk of bias with insufficient power (fewer than 100 participants), and a lack of trial data on clinically important outcomes. Therefore, firm conclusions cannot be drawn. Trials comparing tamoxifen administered with any other anticancer drug versus standard care, usual care, or alternative treatment as control interventions were lacking. Evidence on the benefits and harms of tamoxifen in participants at the early stages of hepatocellular carcinoma was also lacking.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review had no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

Protocol available via DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014869.

Cytotoxic Effects of Pinnatane A Extracted from Walsura pinnata (Meliaceae) on Human Liver Cancer Cells

BACKGROUND

Pinnatane A from the bark of Walsura pinnata was investigated for its anti-cancer properties by analyzing the cytotoxic activities and cell cycle arrest mechanism induced in two different liver cancer cell lines.

METHODS

A 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was used to analyze the pinnatane A selectivity in inducing cell death in cancer and normal cells. Various biological assays were carried out to analyze the anti-cancer properties of pinnatane A, such as a live/dead assay for cell death microscopic visualization, cell cycle analysis using propidium iodide (PI) to identify the cell cycle arrest phase, annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (annexin V-FITC)/PI flow cytometry assay to measure percentage of cell populations at different stages of apoptosis and necrosis, and DNA fragmentation assay to verify the late stage of apoptosis.

RESULTS

The MTT assay identified pinnatane A prominent dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity effects in Hep3B and HepG2 cells, with minimal effect on normal cells. The live/dead assay showed significant cell death, while cell cycle analysis showed arrest at the G₀/G₁ phase in both cell lines. Annexin V-FITC/PI flow cytometry and DNA fragmentation assays identified apoptotic cell death in Hep3B and necrotic cell death in HepG2 cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Pinnatane A has the potential for further development as a chemotherapeutic agent prominently against human liver cells.

Assessment of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of the literature

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high incidence all over the world. Even if the primary end point of treatment of HCC is survival, radiological response could be a surrogate end point of survival, and could have a key role in clinical management. Since 1950 several radiological response criteria have been applied; however, it was not until 2000 that specific criteria for HCC were introduced by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and these were then standardized in 2010 with the development of the modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (mRECIST) for HCC. The purpose of this brief review is to compare data in literature regarding the application and the performance of mRECIST in clinical practice, and to discuss unclear and open issues.

Metronomic chemotherapy: possible clinical application in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a hypervascular highly angiogenic tumor usually associated with liver cirrhosis. Vascular endothelial growth factor plays a critical role in vascular development in HCC. In contrast to the treatment of early-stage HCC, the treatment options for advanced HCC are limited and prognosis is often poor, which contributes to this tumor type being the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Metronomic chemotherapy, which was originally designed to inhibit angiogenesis, involves low-dose chemotherapeutic agents administered in a frequent regular schedule with no prolonged breaks and minimizes severe toxicities. We reviewed the potential effects and impact of metronomic chemotherapy in preclinical studies with HCC models and in patients with advanced HCC, especially when combined with a molecular targeted agent. Metronomic chemotherapy involves multiple mechanisms that include antiangiogenesis and antivasculogenesis, immune stimulation by reducing regulatory T cells and inducing dendritic cell maturation, and possibly some direct tumor cell targeting effects, including the cancer stem cell subpopulation. The total number of preclinical studies with HCC models shows impressive results using metronomic chemotherapy-based protocols, especially in conjunction with molecular targeted agents. Four clinical trials and two case reports evaluating metronomic chemotherapy for HCC indicate it to be a safe and potentially useful treatment for HCC. Several preclinical and clinical HCC studies suggest that metronomic chemotherapy may become an alternative type of chemotherapy for advanced unresectable HCC and postsurgical adjuvant treatment of HCC.

Tamoxifen compared to best supportive care in advanced hepatocelluar carcinoma: A retrospective matched-cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer worldwide as well as in Egypt with hepatitis B and C, alcohol and aflatoxins being the commonest risk factors. Tamoxifen was initially reported to confer a marginal survival benefit in advanced HCC. However, later reports declined any benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To study the impact of tamoxifen on overall survival (OS) compared to best supportive care (BSC) in Egyptian patients with advanced HCC.

METHODS

This retrospective matched-cohort study was conducted at Tanta Cancer Center (TCC), Egypt where 116 advanced HCC cases treated with tamoxifen were compared to TNM stage and Child-Pugh class matched 116 HCC cases who received BSC.

RESULTS

The median OS in the tamoxifen group was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.7-11.9 months) compared to 8.7 months (95%CI, 6.8-10.6) in the BSC group (p=0.758). With univariate analyses, it was shown that absence of fatigue, Child-Pugh class A, single tumors, less advanced tumors (T2), and absence of metastases (M0), had significantly better OS than their counterparts. Multivariate analysis showed that absence of fatigue, Child-Pugh class A and T2 tumors were independent prognostic factors affecting OS. Tamoxifen produced partial response and clinical stabilization in one% and 16% of cases, respectively. The median PFS with tamoxifen was 7.2 months (95%CI, 5.2-9.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Tamoxifen did not show any OS advantage in Egyptian patients with advanced HCC. Use of this drug is discouraged.

Systemic treatment and targeted therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

ADVANCED HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA (HCC) IS A MALIGNANCY OF GLOBAL IMPORTANCE: it is the sixth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite decades of efforts by many investigators, systemic chemotherapy or hormone therapy has failed to demonstrate improved survival in patients with HCC.. Ongoing studies are evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of combining Sorafenib with erlotinib and other targeted agents or chemotherapy.

AIMS

On the basis of placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trials, Sorafenib has shown improved survival benefits in advanced HCC and has set a new standard for future clinical trials. The successful clinical development of Sorafenib in HCC has ushered in the era of molecularly targeted agents in this disease, which is discussed in this educational review.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Many molecularly targeted agents that inhibit angiogenesis, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mammalian target of rapamycin are at different stages of clinical development in advanced HCC. Future research should continue to unravel the mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis and to identify key relevant molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Identification and validation of potential surrogate and predictive biomarkers hold promise to individualize patients' treatment to maximize clinical benefit and minimize the toxicity and cost of targeted agents.

RESULTS

Systemic therapy with various classes of agents, including hormone and cytotoxic agents, has provided no or marginal benefits. Improved understanding of the mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis, coupled with the arrival of many newly developed molecularly targeted agents, has provided the unique opportunity to study some of these novel agents in advanced HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

The demonstration of improved survival benefits by Sorafenib in advanced HCC has ushered in the era of molecular-targeted therapy in this disease, with many agents undergoing active clinical development.

Update on new approaches in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major health problem. It is currently the third cause of cancer-related death, it is highly prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa, and is increasing in Western countries. The natural history of HCC is very heterogeneous and prediction of survival in individual patients is not satisfactory because of the wide spectrum of the disease. During the past decade, major advances have been achieved in prevention, through better surveillance of patients at risk, and in therapy through better surgical and ablative therapies and multimodal treatment approaches. Moreover, the increasing knowledge of molecular hepatocarcinogenesis provides the opportunity for targeted therapies. In this setting, the impact of sorafenib on advanced-stage HCC is a landmark finding in the treatment of liver cancer. The role of sorafenib administration as adjuvant therapy after curative treatment is being evaluated in clinical studies. Future research should lead to a molecular classification of the disease and a more personalized treatment approach.

Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: dawn of a new era?

PURPOSE AND DESIGN

Despite decades of efforts by many investigators, systemic chemotherapy or hormone therapy have failed to demonstrate improved survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). On the basis of placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trials, sorafenib has shown improved survival benefits in advanced HCC and has set a new standard for future clinical trials. The successful clinical development of sorafenib in HCC has ushered in the era of molecularly targeted agents in this disease, which is discussed in this educational review.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Ongoing studies are evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of combining sorafenib with erlotinib and other targeted agents or chemotherapy. Many molecularly targeted agents that inhibit angiogenesis, epidermal growth factor receptor, and mammalian target of rapamycin are at different stages of clinical development in advanced HCC. Combining targeted agents that inhibit different pathways in hepatocarcinogenesis is an area of active investigation. Future research should continue to unravel the mechanism of hepatocarcinogenesis and to identify key relevant molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Identification and validation of potential surrogate and predictive biomarkers holds promise to individualize patients' treatment to maximize clinical benefit and minimize the toxicity and cost of targeted agents. We hope that we will continue to improve the efficacy of systemic therapy in advanced HCC in the coming years.

A meta-analysis of survival rates of untreated patients in randomized clinical trials of hepatocellular carcinoma

Knowing the spontaneous outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is important for designing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of new therapeutic approaches; however, survival of patients in the absence of treatment is highly variable, and prognostic factors influencing outcomes are incompletely defined. The aims of this meta-analysis were to estimate the 1-year and 2-year survival rates of untreated HCC patients enrolled in RCTs of palliative treatments, and to identify prognostic factors. RCTs evaluating therapies for HCC with placebo or no-treatment arms were identified on MEDLINE through April 2009. Data were combined in a random effect model. Primary outcomes were 1-year and 2-year survival. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimates of the survival rates were 17.5% at 1 year (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 11%-27%; range, 0%-75%) and 7.3% at 2 years (95%CI, 3.9%-13%; range, 0%-50%). Heterogeneity among studies was highly significant (P < 0.0001) both for 1-year and 2-year survival, and persisted when RCTs were stratified according to all patient and study features. Through meta-regression, impaired performance status, Child-Pugh B-C class, and presence of portal vein thrombosis were all independently associated with shorter survival. Ascites was strongly linked to a worse outcome in intermediate/advanced Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis confirms the heterogeneity of behavior of untreated HCC and provides a sound basis for stratifying patients with HCC according to expected survival in future trials of new anti-cancer agents.

Systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: are we making progress?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer deaths. Surgical resection, with or without transplantation, can result in long-term survival. However, surgery can only be performed in about 15% of patients with HCC and the 5-year survival rate is only approximately 33%-50% after potentially curative resection. Percutaneous ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation, and transarterial chemoembolization are invasive techniques that have shown efficacy in reducing tumor bulk. Similarly, systemic chemotherapy may induce tumor responses, but a survival benefit has not been clearly demonstrated. In addition, the lack of efficacy of antiandrogens, tamoxifen, and single-agent interferon has now been confirmed.Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic, proapoptotic, and Raf kinase inhibitory activity. In a large, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial there was a significant improvement in both time to disease progression and overall survival with sorafenib compared with placebo. Sorafenib is the first agent to demonstrate a consistent improvement in overall survival for patients with advanced HCC. Further studies are required to determine the role of other molecular-targeted therapies, either alone or in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Further studies are also required to determine the role of sorafenib in combination with locoregional therapies (eg, transarterial chemoembolization), and the role of sorafenib as adjuvant therapy following surgery.

Is human hepatocellular carcinoma a hormone-responsive tumor?

Before the positive results recently obtained with multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib, there was no standard systemic treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sex hormones receptors are expressed in a significant proportion of HCC samples. Following preclinical and epidemiological studies supporting a relationship between sex hormones and HCC tumorigenesis, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) tested the efficacy of the anti-estrogen tamoxifen as systemic treatment. Largest among these trials showed no survival advantage from the administration of tamoxifen, and the recent Cochrane systematic review produced a completely negative result. This questions the relevance of estrogen receptor-mediated pathways in HCC. However, a possible explanation for these disappointing results is the lack of proper patients selection according to sex hormones receptors expression, but unfortunately the interaction between this expression and efficacy of tamoxifen has not been studied adequately. It has been also proposed that negative results might be explained if tamoxifen acts in HCC via an estrogen receptor-independent pathway, that requires higher doses than those usually administered, but an Asian RCT conducted to assess dose-response effect was completely negative. Interesting, preliminary results have been obtained when hormonal treatment (tamoxifen or megestrol) has been selected according to the presence of wild-type or variant estrogen receptors respectively, but no large RCTs are available to support this strategy. Negative results have been obtained also with anti-androgen therapy. In conclusion, there is no robust evidence to consider HCC a hormone-responsive tumor. Hormonal treatments should not be part of the current management of HCC.

Liver expression of steroid hormones and Apolipoprotein D receptors in hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate the tissular expression of Androgen (A), Estrogen (E) and Progesterone (Pg) receptors, and Apolipoprotein D (ApoD), in liver tumors from resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases in order to assess their possible relationship to prognosis.

METHODS: We performed an immunohistochemical study using tissue microarrays (containing more than 260 cancer specimens, from 31 HCC patients and controls) to determine the presence of specific antibodies against AR, ER, PgR and ApoD, correlating their findings with several clinico-pathological and biological variables. The staining results were categorized using a semi-quantitive score based on their intensity, and the percentage of immunostained cells was measured.

RESULTS: A total of 21 liver tumors (67.7%) were positive for AR; 16 (51.6%) for ER; 26 (83.9%) for PgR and 12 (38.7%) stained for ApoD. We have found a wide variability in the immunostaining score values for each protein, with a median (range) of 11.5 (11.5-229.5) for AR; 11.1 (8.5-65) for ER; 14.2 (4-61) for PgR; and 37.7 (13.8-81.1) for ApoD. A history of heavy ethanol consumption, correlated positively with AR and PgR and negatively with ER status. HCV chronic infection also correlated positively with AR and PgR status. However, the presence of ApoD immunostaining did not correlate with any of these variables. Tumors with a positive immuno-staining for PgR showed a better prognosis.

CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a moderate clinical value of the steroid receptor status in HCC, emphasizing the need to perform further studies in order to evaluate the possible role of new hormonal-based therapies.

Systemic Therapy of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Hopeful Should We Be?

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related death. In the U.S., 18,510 new cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile duct are expected in 2006, with an estimated 16,200 deaths. The incidence rates for HCC in the U.S. continued to rise steadily through 1998 and doubled during the period 1975-1995. Unresectable or metastatic HCC carries a poor prognosis, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic agents provides marginal benefit. A majority of HCC patients (>80%) presents with advanced or unresectable disease. Even for those with resected disease, the recurrence rate can be as high as 50% at 2 years. Because of the poor track record of systemic therapy in HCC, there has been a sense of nihilism for this disease in the oncology community for decades. However, with the arrival of newly developed molecularly targeted agents and the success of some of these agents in other traditionally challenging cancers, like renal cell carcinoma, there has recently been renewed interest in developing systemic therapy for HCC. This review attempts to concisely summarize the historical perspective and the current status of systemic therapy development in HCC.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common tumors globally, with varying prevalence based on endemic risk factors. In high-risk populations, including those with hepatitis B or C or with cirrhosis, serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and screening ultrasound have improved detection of resectable HCC. Treatment options, including surgical resection, for patients with HCC must be selected based on the number and size of hepatic tumors, underlying hepatic function, patient condition, and available resources. An approach, which has been summarized shows the corresponding treatment choices under given clinical circumstances. For cirrhotic patients with less than three tumor nodules of a size less than 3 cm or a solitary HCC less than 5 cm, liver transplantation offers long-term survival similar to that observed in patients transplanted for nonmalignant disease. Ablative treatment using either chemical or thermal techniques provides locally effective tumor destruction. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is commonly used for palliation of unresectable tumors as well as an adjunct to surgical resection, treatment of tumors before transplant, and in conjunction with other ablative therapies in a multimodality approach. Regional approaches to chemotherapy have produced more encouraging results than systemic chemotherapy, although both remain ineffective for long-term tumor control. Several newer treatment modalities are under investigation, including gene therapy, tagged antibodies, isolated perfusion, and novel radiotherapy techniques.

[Non-surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. An overview]

Surgery is often not a treatment option in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with the numerous limitations of liver transplantation or surgical resection due to coexisting cirrhosis in the later case. Non-surgical treatments deal with 3 types of methods: local ablation with curative purpose, transarterial treatments with many technical variants and systemic treatment. Local treatments rely on chemical or thermic agents to achieve ablation of liver lesions, which not exceed initially 3 cm in diameter. The use of radiofrequency ablation allows now larger limits. Intra-arterial treatment usually combines intra-arterial chemotherapy with embolisation of hepatic artery in a procedure called chemoembolisation. Its antitumoral effect mainly due to ischemia is well documented but the influence on survival remains controversial. Finally systemic treatments have yet to be demonstrated useful: new agents and new randomised trials are still needed.

Randomized controlled trial of tamoxifen in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Randomized studies on tamoxifen treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) produced conflicting results. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen administration in improving overall survival of patients with advanced HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 420 patients with HCC who were not suitable for surgery or local treatment were randomly assigned between April 1995 and May 2000: 210 in the control group and 210 in the tamoxifen group (20 mg/d orally). Patients with WHO performance status greater than 2, belonging to Child-Pugh class C, or with serum creatinine greater than 130 mumol/L were not eligible.

RESULTS

Tolerance was good and the main reported adverse effects were thrombophlebitis (three patients), nausea (two patients), and hot flushes (three patients). Outcome did not differ between the two treatment arms: estimated median survival was 4.8 and 4.0 months in the tamoxifen and in the control groups, respectively (P = .25). Univariate analysis showed significant association of survival with age, Okuda stage, WHO performance status, Child-Pugh class, intrahepatic tumor stage, alpha-fetoprotein serum concentration, and presence of extrahepatic spread, portal vein thrombosis, hepatomegaly, or hepatalgia. In a Cox proportional hazards model we found a significant beneficial effect of tamoxifen on survival in patients belonging to Okuda I or II stages.

CONCLUSION

In this large study, tamoxifen did not improve the survival of patients with advanced HCC, but there is a suggestion that patients without major hepatic insufficiency seem to have some survival benefit. New trials involving this specific population are warranted.

Use of tamoxifen in advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Survival is poor for patients with advanced-stage HCC, and small trials of tamoxifen for patients with this disease have shown conflicting results. The authors conducted a systematic review of randomized clinical trials to compare the effect of a tamoxifen-containing arm with a nontamoxifen-containing arm in advanced HCC.

METHODS

Eligible trials were identified from the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group register and other databases. Studies were selected for inclusion and their methodologic quality assessed by three independent reviewers. Hazard ratios (HR) were derived for overall survival where possible. Metaanalysis was performed using a fixed-effect model.

RESULTS

The authors identified 10 randomized trials with a total of 1709 patients. Use of tamoxifen had no effect on median survival (HR, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.16; P = 0.4) or tumor response rate. The findings were stable in sensitivity analyses and were not affected by publication bias or inclusion of low-quality studies or studies reported in abstract form only. Few adverse events or withdrawals were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no support for the therapeutic use of tamoxifen in advanced HCC, nor for its use as a control arm in future clinical trials.

Relation of hemochromatosis with hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology, screening, treatment, and prevention

HH is a common inherited disorder of iron metabolism affecting about 1 out of 250 individuals of Northern European decent. Many of these patients do not have evident phenotypic expression and do not develop significant iron loading. Some patients, however, develop progressive iron overload and cirrhosis. These individuals are at risk of developing HCC. Cirrhotics with hemochromatosis should undergo regular screening for HCC. If HCC is identified early, treatment with either resection or liver transplantation is optimal. Palliative measures, including ablative therapy and chemoembolization, can be used. With increasing clinical recognition,hemochromatosis should be diagnosed earlier and progression to cirrhosis and HCC should be minimized.

Novel systemic therapy options for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma, a common malignancy globally, has been increasing in incidence in the United States, mostly due to the rising incidence of Hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. The prognosis of patients with this cancer has been poor and even tumor resection has rarely been curative. However, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with long-term survival benefit and cures, provided rigorous patient-selection criteria were adhered to. Liver cirrhosis is the most common precursor for HCC, and attempts have been made to prevent the progression from liver cirrhosis to HCC. Post resection adjuvant therapies have included interferon, polyprenoic acid, and adoptive immunotherapy. Finding effective systemic treatments for non-resectable HCC has been challenging and quite frustrating. The presence of liver cirrhosis and the associated volume expansion, electrolyte imbalances, decreased liver synthetic and metabolic reserve, and portal hypertension has made the design of systemic therapy for HCC a major challenge. Additionally staging of HCC using the Tumor Node Metastases (TNM) system, but ignoring the underlying liver disease made it extremely difficult to compare results of different trials. However by and large it would seem, that the more aggressive chemotherapy agents and combinations were associated with median survival times of 3-5 months. Considering the vascular nature of HCC it may be reasonable to combine tolerable chemotherapy with newly released agents with angiogenesis inhibiting properties. Thus, systemic therapy of HCC is a work in progress that calls for additional trials of tolerable newer agents and combinations.

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Whilst local treatments are useful in selected patients, they are not suitable for many with advanced disease. Here, we review phase II and III trials for systemic therapy of advanced disease, finding no strong evidence that any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy regimen trialled to date benefits survival in this setting. Many trials were inadequately powered, single centre, and enrolled highly selected patients. From this review, we cannot recommend any therapeutic approach in these patients outside of a clinical trial setting. Including an untreated control arm in clinical trials in HCC is still justified. Every effort should be made to enroll these patients into adequately powered trials, and promising phase II results must be tested in a multicentre phase III setting, preferably against a placebo control arm. Prevention of hepatitis B and C remains vital to decrease deaths from HCC.

Therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: review of the randomized clinical trials—II: systemic and local non-embolization-based therapies in unresectable and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is not only common, but often presents at a stage when potentially curative therapies are not feasible. Although hepatic artery chemoembolization likely confers survival benefit in unresectable HCC, the associated toxicities are substantial and warrant investigation of more efficacious and safe therapies. Many patients who present with unresectable HCC are not chemoembolization candidates, either because of extensive disease or severely impaired hepatic function. We reviewed 44 randomized trials investigating non-embolization-based therapies in unresectable HCC. Hepatic artery infusion of [I]lipiodol appears safe; initial studies suggest a survival benefit and efficacy comparable to more toxic embolization-based therapies. Some cytotoxic chemotherapy may confer a modest survival benefit in advanced HCC (including oral fluoropyrimidines, and hepatic arterial or i.v. cisplatin and doxorubicin). Tamoxifen does not confer survival benefit, either in advanced or limited HCC. Other therapies warranting further study include interferon (in optimally cytoreduced HCC), megestrol in patients with variant estrogen receptors, octreotide and pravastatin. More adequately powered, rigorously conducted studies will hopefully identify useful chemo-, radio-, immuno-, embolization-based and biologically targeted therapies during the next decade.

[Best supportive care of hepatocellular carcinoma]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in some areas of the world. The major etiologic risk factors include toxins (alcohol, aflatoxin B(1)), hepatitis B and C virus infection as well as various inherited metabolic disorders. The prognosis of HCC patients is generally very poor with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. The diagnosis is based on biochemical and imaging tests as well as histology. Therapeutic strategies include surgery (resection or liver transplantation) and non-surgical interventions, such as percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency thermal ablation as well as transarterial embolization or chemoembolization. Radio- or chemotherapy are mostly ineffective. Therefore, the development and evaluation of novel HCC treatment strategies as well as the implementation of existing and the development of new measures to prevent HCC are of utmost importance. The better understanding of the clinical and molecular pathogenesis of HCC should lead to improved diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive strategies with the aim to reduce the incidence of HCC, one of the most devastating malignancies worldwide.

Tamoxifen for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (primary liver cancer) is the third commonest cause of cancer mortality world-wide. Survival is poor for patients with advanced disease. Trials of tamoxifen for hepatocellular carcinoma have conflicting results.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review of the literature to assess the effect of tamoxifen on overall survival, quality-of-life, tumour response, and treatment toxicity in people with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials from The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (January 2004), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2003), and MEDLINE database (1966 to November 2003). We searched bibliographies of review articles and identified trials, and hand-searched abstracts from relevant other meetings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised clinical trials of treatment with tamoxifen compared to a control treatment without tamoxifen in people with hepatocellular carcinoma, including trials of tamoxifen versus placebo, tamoxifen versus best supportive care, and tamoxifen plus other treatment versus the same other treatment alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, rated them for methodologic quality components (generation of allocation sequence; allocation concealment; blinding; and follow-up), and extracted data on the specified outcomes. Hazard ratios were derived for overall survival where possible. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten randomised trials randomising 1709 patients were included. Tamoxifen versus placebo/no intervention had no significant effect on overall survival (hazard ratio 1.05; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.16; P = 0.4). This comparison showed no statistical heterogeneity (P = 0.2 and I(2 ) = 25.9%). Subgroup analysis showed that tamoxifen tended to increase mortality in trials with three adequate/three methodological components (hazard ratio 1.15; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.34; P = 0.06), showed no significant effect in trials with two adequate/three methodological components (hazard ratio 1.00; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.18; P = 0.98), and tended to reduce mortality in trials with one or less adequate/three methodological components (hazard ratio 0.82; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.12; P = 0.2), although this may have been confounded by the use of higher doses of tamoxifen in the better quality trials. Tamoxifen was associated with adverse effects. One trial measured patient quality of life, but the results were not reported in detail.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

These data do not support the use of tamoxifen for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Further research on the effects of tamoxifen in hepatocellular carcinoma does not seem warranted.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cause of cancer, and its incidence is increasing worldwide because of the dissemination of hepatitis B and C virus infection. Patients with cirrhosis are at the highest risk and should be monitored every 6 months. Surveillance can lead to diagnosis at early stages, when the tumour might be curable by resection, liver transplantation, or percutaneous treatment. In the West and Japan, these treatments can be applied to 30% of patients, and result in 5-year survival rates higher than 50%. Resection is indicated among patients who have one tumour and well-preserved liver function. Liver transplantation benefits patients who have decompensated cirrhosis and one tumour smaller than 5 cm or three nodules smaller than 3 cm, but donor shortage greatly limits its applicability. This difficulty might be overcome by living donation. Most HCC patients are diagnosed at advanced stages and receive palliative treatments, which have been assessed in the setting of 63 randomised controlled trials during the past 25 years. Meta-analysis shows that only chemoembolisation improves survival in well-selected patients with unresectable HCC.

An independent evaluation of modern prognostic scores in a central European cohort of 120 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer worldwide. As prognosis of HCC patients depends not only on tumour extension but also on liver function, TNM staging of HCC is of limited value. The Okuda score incorporating the variables of liver function and tumour extension is used widely. However, among patients with an intermediate Okuda score, survival varies considerably. Several newer scores promise to perform better than the Okuda score in stratifying HCC patients. We therefore tested the ability of several newer scores to predict survival in comparison to the Okuda score in a European cohort of HCC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 120 patients with sufficient follow-up data were identified retrospectively among the 130 patients with HCC first seen between 1997 and 2000 in our department. Child-Pugh score, Okuda score, Vienna survival model for HCC (VISUM-HCC) score, Chevret score, Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) classification and cancer of the liver Italian programme (CLIP) score were calculated. Survival analysis was performed for all eligible patients stratified according to each scoring system. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed using six months survival as the outcome measure. Univariate and stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Survival times of HCC patients grouped according to all scores were significantly different. All scores performed similarly to the Okuda score in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Prognostic factors for survival were albumin concentration and the presence of portal obstruction.

CONCLUSION

In our central European cohort, there was no advantage of using the newer scores instead of the Okuda score.

Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival

There is no standard treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Survival benefits derived from medical interventions are controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the evidence of the impact of medical treatments on survival. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published as full papers assessing survival for primary treatments of HCC were included. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, CANCERLIT, and a manual search from 1978 to May 2002 were used. The primary end point was survival, and the secondary end point was response to treatment. Estimates of effect were calculated according to the random effects model. Sensitivity analysis included methodological quality. We identified 61 randomized trials, but only 14 met the criteria to perform a meta-analysis assessing arterial embolization (7 trials, 545 patients) or tamoxifen (7 trials, 898 patients). Arterial embolization improved 2-year survival compared with control (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.89; P =.017). Sensitivity analysis showed a significant benefit of chemoembolization with cisplatin or doxorubicin (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.88) but none with embolization alone (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29-1.20). Overall, treatment induced objective responses in 35% of patients (range, 16%-61%). Tamoxifen showed no antitumoral effect and no survival benefits (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.36-1.13; P =.13), and only low-quality scale trials suggested 1-year improvement in survival. In conclusion, chemoembolization improves survival of patients with unresectable HCC and may become the standard treatment. Treatment with tamoxifen does not modify the survival of patients with advanced disease.

Systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma is indicated in locally advanced or metastatic disease. Monochemotherapies have yielded unsatisfactory results with response rates of around 20% but survival is often not improved. Polychemotherapies may induce complete responses but have substantial toxicity and are limited to selected patients with preserved liver function. Hormonal treatment with tamoxifen is ineffective while megestrol has shown an improvement in quality of life. Octreotide can be given even in cases of impaired liver function, has also a favorable side effect profile and can lead to disease stabilization. Adjuvant therapy with interferon is indicated after successful liver resection or transplantation in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, the role of interferon in other indications or in combination with chemotherapy remains to be determined.

Randomized clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary cancer

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains among the most common malignancies in the world. Many of the advances in the treatment of this disease have come from combinations of early detection in endemic areas, improved radiologic evaluation in defining extent of disease, an increased use of nonsurgical treatment and improvements in surgical technique.

Hepatocellular carcinoma--cause, treatment and metastasis

In the recent decades, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been found to be increasing in males in some countries. In China, HCC ranked second of cancer mortality since 1990s. Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) and dietary aflatoxin intake remain the major causative factors of HCC. Surgery plays a major role in the treatment of HCC, particularly for small HCC. Down-staging unresectable huge HCC to smaller HCC and followed by resection will probably be a new approach for further study. Liver transplantation is indicated for small HCC, however, some issues remain to be solved. Different modes of regional cancer therapy for HCC have been tried. Systemic chemotherapy has been disappointing in the past but the future can be promising. Biotherapy, such as cytokines, differentiation inducers, anti-angiogenic agents, gene therapy and tumor vaccine will probably play a role, particularly in the prevention of tumor recurrence. HCC invasiveness is currently the major target of study. Tremendous works have been done at the molecular level, which will provide clues for biomarker of HCC progression as well as targets for intervention.

Liver cancer

The prognosis of patients with HCC remains dismal. Even in the subgroups of patients who have the most favorable characteristics and are eligible for surgical resection, the 5-year survival rate is less than 25%. For patients with more advanced disease, the median survival time is less than 1 year. The good news in HCC research is that the disease can be prevented. In Taiwan, the rate of HCC in children aged 6 to 9 years decreased from 5.2 per million population before the neonatal vaccination program began in 1984 to 1.3 per million population in the first vaccinated cohort. Treatment of viral hepatitis with IFN may decrease the rates of long-term development of HCC. Other agents that may prevent second primary tumors following resection of HCC, such as polyprenoic acid and acylic retinoid, are also being investigated.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of a cohort of 101 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To conduct a cohort study of 101 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presenting to a tertiary care medical referral center in Germany between 1997 and 1999.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were retrospectively analyzed by chart review. In 95 cases (72 males and 23 females) sufficient data were available for analysis. Twenty five (29%) of 85 patients were HBsAg or anti HBc positive, 21/85 (25%) were anti HCV positive, and 6/ 85 (7%) were positive for both HBV and HCV-markers. Age was significantly lower in HBV positive patients than in the other two groups. Thirty one (34%) of 90 patients had histories of alcohol abuse. In 79/94 (84%) patients, cirrhosis was diagnosed. Of these cirrhotic patients, 29/79 (37%) belonged to Child Pugh’s group (CHILD) A, 32/79 (40%) to CHILD B, and 18/79 (23%) to CHILD C. AFP was elevated in 61/91 (67%) patients. A single tumor nodule was found in 38/94 (40%), more than one nodule in 31/94 (34%), and 25/94 (26%) had a diffusely infiltrating tumor, i.e. the tumor margins could not be seen on imaging procedures. Portal vein thrombosis was present in 19/94 (20%). Imaging data consistent with lymph node metastases were found in 10/92 (11%), while distant metastases were found in 8/93 (9%). According to Okuda 28/94 (30%) were grouped to stage I, 53/94 (56%) were grouped to stage II, and 13/94 (14%) were grouped to stage III. Survival data were available for 83 patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for median survival was 84 months. Factors influencing survival were the Okuda score, the presence of portal vein thrombosis, and the presence of ascites. The presence of non complicated liver cirrhosis by itself, distant metastases, or infection with hepatitis viruses did not influence survival. AFP positivity by itself did not influence survival, though patients with an AFP value greater than 100 μg/L did experience shortened survival. Treatment besides tamoxifen or supportive care was associated with prolonged survival. The influence of therapy on survival was most pronounced in Okuda stage II patients. There was longer survival in those Okuda stage II patients who were treated with percutaneous ethanol injection.

CONCLUSION: Even in a low incidence area such as Germany, the majority of HCC is caused by viral hepatitis and therefore potentially preventable. Reflecting the high proportion of advanced stage tumors in our patients, the median survival was poor. Patients who received active therapy had a longer survival.

Nonsurgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Given the poor prognosis of HCC and the therapeutic challenge posed by underlying liver cirrhosis, efforts and resources must be directed towards preventive strategies. Return on the investment in such research is likely to be greater than can be expected from treatment of advanced disease.

Early diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing world-wide. Although there are no randomized controlled trials showing benefits from surveillance programmes, these strategies have been widely practised by hepatologists, and most early tumours are diagnosed in the setting of such a policy. In this chapter we summarize the surveillance schedule and recall the policy applied in our Unit. Diagnosis at an early stage is crucial to allow the application of curative treatments that are the only hope for increasing the life expectancy of the patient. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are considered the first-line options for early tumours, although there is no agreement on which is the best approach. Resection is limited by the high recurrence rate, whereas the increasing waiting times have decreased the intention-to-treat outcomes of transplantation. Percutaneous treatments are reserved for patients with single non-surgical tumours. Clinical trials assessing treatments for patients with advanced tumours have not shown any survival benefits.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is feasible, particularly in patients known to be at risk from chronic hepatitis and chronic liver disease. The optimal surveillance strategy is unknown. HCC usually presents as an incurable disease even when detected on surveillance. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice, but the coexistence of chronic liver disease and the insidious nature of HCC make it unresectable in most patients. Orthotopic liver transplantation for selected patients or ablative techniques may offer an opportunity to render patients disease-free even if the tumor is unresectable. There are numerous therapies offered to patients with unresectable HCC, including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and regional intra-arterial treatments. While potentially palliative, none of these approaches has been demonstrated to prolong survival in these patients. If possible, the treatment of patients with HCC should be done on clinical trials.

Use of tamoxifen in hepatocellular carcinoma: a review and paradigm shift

Hepatocellular carcinoma is often diagnosed at a late, inoperable stage for which there are no uniformly efficacious treatment available presently. The oral anti-oestrogen drug, tamoxifen, has been used in such patients, based on the belief that the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma is promoted by endogenous oestrogen via a receptor-mediated process. In this review, we examine the trials reported in the literature using tamoxifen in hepatocellular carcinoma. Randomized controlled trials with tamoxifen have so far revealed mixed results. We propose that this may be due to the fact that the mechanism of action of tamoxifen in hepatocellular carcinoma is via an oestrogen-receptor independent pathway that requires much higher doses of tamoxifen for activation than those used in the trials so far. Thus there must be a paradigm shift to dissociate the action of tamoxifen from oestrogen receptors in hepatocellular carcinoma. This means that future trials with tamoxifen in hepatocellular carcinoma should use higher doses of tamoxifen, at least four to eight-fold that of the dose that is efficacious in an oestrogen-receptor dependent mechanism.

Treatment of mastalgia with tamoxifen in male patients with liver cirrhosis: a randomized crossover study

OBJECTIVE

Mastalgia is occasionally found in patients with liver cirrhosis, especially in those receiving spironolactone for treatment of ascites. The pathogenesis is still unclear. Estrogen excess in cirrhotic patients and estrogenic effects of the spironolactone are possible leading causes. Treatment directed against the preponderance of estrogenic stimulation in these patients has never been investigated. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tamoxifen, an estrogen antagonist, on mastalgia in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

A total of 16 male cirrhotic patients with mastalgia were randomly assigned to two groups. One group was treated with tamoxifen (20 mg p.o., b.i.d.) for 1 month, followed by placebo for the next month. The other group was treated in the reverse order. All patients received spironolactone for ascites and/or peripheral edema, and the drug was continued during the study period. The size of the breasts and the degree of breast pain and tenderness were recorded in all subjects before and after the treatment periods. Serum levels of estradiol and testosterone were measured using the radioimmunoassay method.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients, 14 experienced a decrease or disappearance of the breast pain and/or tenderness during the tamoxifen treatment period, whereas only two of the 16 patients felt an improvement during the placebo period (p < 0.05). There were significant improvements in the breast pain and tenderness scores and decreases in the breast sizes during the tamoxifen treatment period (before vs after: 1.4+/-0.3 vs 0.4+/-0.2, p = 0.002; 1.9+/-0.2 vs 0.5+/-0.2, p < 0.001; and 6.8+/-0.6 vs 5.5+/-0.6 cm, p = 0.02, respectively), whereas no obvious change was seen during the placebo period. Serum levels of estradiol and testosterone did not change significantly after the tamoxifen or placebo treatments (p > 0.05). No major side effects were noted during the therapeutic periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Tamoxifen is effective and safe in the management of mastalgia in male cirrhotic patients taking spironolactone.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in central Sydney: a 10 year review of patients seen in a medical oncology department

AIM: To report a single Australian oncology unit’s experience with the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in the context of a literature review of the current management issues.

METHODS: Retrospective case record review of 76 patients with diagnosis of HCC referred to the unit between 1984 and 1995.

RESULTS: Sixty-three patients had adequate records for analysis. Thirty-six (56%) were migrants with half from Southeast Asia. Twenty-four p atients had a documented viral aetiology. Nine (14%) of 51 patients with pathological confirmation of HCC had normal alpha-fetoprotein levels. Median survival of the 20 patients managed palliatively was 5 weeks compared to 16 weeks for the cohort overall. Surgery in 16 patients rendered all initially disease free with a median survival of 88 weeks. Chemoembolisation induced tumor responses in 5 of the 11 patients so treated. Systemic chemotherapy and tamoxifen treatment caused tumor response in two of 12 and one of 25 respectively.

CONCLUSION: Prolonged survival of patients with HCC depends on early detection of small tumors suitable for surgical resection. Other active t reatments are palliative in intent and have limited success. In addition to tumor response and survival duration, the toxicities of therapies and the overall quality of life of patients need to be considered as important outcomes. Viral hepatitis prevention and screening of individuals at risk are strategies that are important for HCC management in communities where the disease is endemic.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis C infection is associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and progress has been made in a number of areas. Transgenic mice lines expressing the hepatitis C core protein develop hepatic steatosis, adenomas, and hepatocellular carcinomas, with no significant hepatitis or fibrosis. This implies that hepatitis C can lead directly to malignant transformation. A new lesion, irregular regeneration, has been described in chronic hepatitis C infection and is associated with a 15-fold increase in the relative risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma. A minority of patients with hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma have intense lymphocytic infiltration of the cancer, a feature associated with a better prognosis. Several studies have confirmed the association between large cell dysplasia and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, large cell dysplasia may not be a premalignant lesion and instead may be a marker for premalignant alterations elsewhere in the liver. Oral contraceptives previously have been linked to an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. A large multicenter European case-control study has shown minimal increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with use of steroidal contraception. Tamoxifen had shown promise in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. However, a randomized placebo-controlled study of 477 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma found no benefit from tamoxifen. In a preliminary study, however, octreotide has shown improved survival and quality of life in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Finally, interferon treatment continues to be linked to a reduced risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C. These studies generally are not randomized, and a randomized prospective study is required to address this issue.