Progesterone does not influence vascular function in postmenopausal women

Beyond reproduction: unraveling the impact of sex hormones on cardiometabolic health

This review thoroughly explores the multifaceted roles of sexual hormones, emphasizing their impact beyond reproductive functions and underscoring their significant influence on cardiometabolic regulation. It analyzes the broader physiological implications of estrogen, testosterone, and progesterone, highlighting their effects on metabolic syndrome, lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, and cardiovascular health. Drawing from diverse molecular, clinical, and therapeutic studies, the paper delves into the intricate interplay between these hormones and cardiometabolic processes. By presenting a comprehensive analysis that goes beyond traditional perspectives, and recognizing sexual hormones as more than reproductive agents, the review sheds light on their broader significance in health and disease management, advocating for holistic and personalized medical approaches.

Menopausal hormone therapy in women with medical conditions

Hormone therapy is the most effective treatment for menopause-related symptoms. Current evidence supports its use in young healthy postmenopausal women under the age of 60 years, and within 10 years of menopause, with benefits typically outweighing risks. However, decision making is more complex in the more common clinical scenario of a symptomatic woman with one or more chronic medical conditions that potentially alter the risk-benefit balance of hormone therapy use. In this review, we present the evidence relating to the use of hormone therapy in women with chronic medical conditions such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, venous thromboembolism, and autoimmune diseases. We discuss the differences between oral and transdermal routes of administration of estrogen and the situations when one route might be preferred over another. We also review evidence regarding the effect of different progestogens, when available.

Menopausal hormone therapy and heart disease prevention: desired or valid?

Cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of death for women in older age groups. For many decades, specialists have tried to prevent their development by the use of estrogen. The review of the literature presents current data on the effect of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on the risk of cardiovascular complications. The results of the main randomized clinical and observational studies in this area, conducted over several decades, are discussed. We described the concept of “window of opportunities”, in accordance with which an improvement in cardiovascular prognosis can be expected only at the onset of MHT in women under the age of 60 years in early postmenopause (menopause duration <10 years). There are experimental and clinical data explaining the different effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular prognosis in women of various age groups and different duration of postmenopause. The recommendations given in the review on the use of MHT are based on modern international guidelines.

Menopause and cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular disease is very common in women. It is still under diagnosed and under treated. Many women are not having their risk factors for cardiovascular disease properly addressed. Many healthcare professionals are uncertain about the role of hormones in cardiovascular disease. This article gives an overview of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease and how to manage those risk factors appropriately, based on the available evidence.

The effects of progesterones on blood lipids in hormone replacement therapy

The safety of progestogens as a class has drawn much attention after the publication of data from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) trial, particularly with respect to cardiovascular disease. Depending on the chemical structure, pharmacokinetics, receptor affinity and potency of action, progestogens have a divergent range of properties that may translate to very different clinical effects. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of varied progestogens in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), especially focusing on blood lipids, which are the most important parameters for assessing cardiovascular disease risk.

Pharmacological modulation of arterial stiffness

Arterial stiffness has emerged as an important marker of cardiovascular risk in various populations and reflects the cumulative effect of cardiovascular risk factors on large arteries, which in turn is modulated by genetic background. Arterial stiffness is determined by the composition of the arterial wall and the arrangement of these components, and can be studied in humans non-invasively. Age and distending pressure are two major factors influencing large artery stiffness. Change in arterial stiffness with drugs is an important endpoint in clinical trials, although evidence for arterial stiffness as a therapeutic target still needs to be confirmed. Drugs that independently affect arterial stiffness include antihypertensive drugs, mostly blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, hormone replacement therapy and some antidiabetic drugs such as glitazones. While the quest continues for 'de-stiffening drugs', so far only advanced glycation endproduct cross-link breakers have shown promise.

Short-term oral progesterone administration antagonizes the effect of transdermal estradiol on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in young healthy women

Very few studies have explored the cardiovascular effects of progesterone in premenopausal women. This study aimed to examine the short-term effects of oral progesterone alone, transdermal estrogen alone, and progesterone and estrogen combined on flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in healthy reproductive-aged women. We suppressed endogenous estrogens and progesterone in 17 premenopausal women for 10-12 days using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist. On day 4 (hormone suppression condition), subjects were tested (n = 17) and were then supplemented with either 200 mg micronized progesterone (n = 8) orally or 0.1 mg estradiol (n = 9) transdermally per day. On day 7 (progesterone-first or estradiol-first condition), subjects were tested and began supplementation with both hormones (n = 17) and were tested again on day 10 (combined hormone condition). FMD of the brachial artery was assessed using B-mode arterial ultrasound, combined with synchronized Doppler analysis. As a result, significant differences in FMD were observed between hormone suppression (7.85 ± 1.06%) and estrogen-first conditions (10.14 ± 1.40%; P < 0.05). The estradiol-induced increase was abolished when oral progesterone was also supplemented (6.27 ± 0.96%). In contrast, we observed a trend toward a decrease in FMD with unopposed progesterone administration, but no statistically significant differences were found between the progesterone-first (6.66 ± 1.23%), hormone suppression (7.80 ± 1.23%), and combined hormone conditions (7.40 ± 1.29%). In conclusion, these data suggest that short-term oral micronized progesterone administration antagonizes the beneficial effect of transdermal estradiol on FMD.

Effect of a low-dose oral contraceptive on venous endothelial function in healthy young women: preliminary results

BACKGROUND

A possible increase in the incidence of venous thromboembolic events has been reported among users of third generation oral contraceptives. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a low dose oral contraceptive (15 microg ethinyl estradiol/60 microg gestodene) on the venous endothelial function of healthy young women.

METHODS

Prospective case control study using the dorsal hand vein technique. Venous endothelial function was evaluated at baseline and after 4 months in the oral contraceptive users group (11 women) and in a control group (9 women). After preconstriction of the vein with phenylephrine, dose-response curves for acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were constructed.

RESULTS

In the contraceptive users group, a reduction occurred in the maximum venodilation response to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside after 4 months of oral contraceptive use, but this difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). No significant changes were detected in maximum venodilation responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside at the 4-month time point in the control group.

CONCLUSION

This study found no significant impairment of endothelium-dependent or independent venodilation in healthy young women following oral contraceptive use. Further studies are necessary using the same methodology in a larger sample over a longer follow-up period.

Exogenous progesterone attenuates the subjective effects of smoked cocaine in women, but not in men

In a previous study, we showed that the positive subjective effects of cocaine were higher during the follicular phase compared to the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The purpose of the present study was to determine if exogenously administered progesterone during the follicular phase in females would attenuate the response to cocaine compared to the normal follicular phase, thus making the response to cocaine similar to the luteal phase. To address the role of sex differences, males were also administered exogenous progesterone during one inpatient stay. In all, 11 female and 10 male non-treatment-seeking cocaine smokers participated. Females had three inpatient stays: one during a normal follicular phase, one during a normal luteal phase, and one during a follicular phase when exogenous progesterone was administered. Males had two inpatient stays: one when exogenous progesterone was administered and the other when placebo was administered. During each inpatient admission, there were four smoked cocaine administration sessions: participants were administered six doses of cocaine (0, 6, 12, or 25 mg cocaine base) at 14 min intervals. Smoked cocaine increased heart rate, blood pressure and several subjective effects such as 'good drug effect' and 'drug quality' cluster scores. Administration of progesterone during the follicular phase in women attenuated the positive subjective effects of cocaine, whereas only minimal changes were observed in men. These results indicate that progesterone modulates the response to cocaine in women and suggests that fluctuations in endogenous progesterone levels account for some of the sex differences observed in humans.

Effect of raloxifene on aortic elasticity in healthy postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

The effect of raloxifene on aortic elasticity in healthy postmenopausal women is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of raloxifene on aortic elasticity and cardiovascular structure and function in healthy postmenopausal women.

METHODS

A randomized, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed. Fourteen healthy postmenopausal women received treatment with raloxifene 60 mg daily and matching placebo for 8 weeks with an 8-week washout period in between the 2 treatment periods. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess ascending thoracic and abdominal aortic elasticity and cardiovascular structure and function (left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and mass and mitral annular displacement) before and at the end of each treatment period.

RESULTS

Administration of raloxifene had no significant effect on either heart rate or systemic blood pressure. Raloxifene treatment was associated with a small decrease of the ascending aorta wall thickness (pretreatment 2.4 +/- 0.3 vs posttreatment 2.2 +/- 0.2 mm, P = .01). Consequently, there was an increase in the Young's elastic modulus after raloxifene treatment at the ascending thoracic aorta but not the abdominal aorta. There were no significant differences in aortic compliance or any cardiac indexes after raloxifene treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Raloxifene administration in healthy postmenopausal women over an 8-week period may decrease the aortic wall thickness but has no significant effects on aortic compliance or cardiac structure and function.

Differential Effect of Urotensin II on Vascular Tone in Normal Subjects and Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Background— Urotensin II (U-II) is a novel vasoactive peptide that also has direct hypertrophic and profibrotic effects on the myocardium. Upregulation of U-II and its receptor has been observed within the heart of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Furthermore, plasma levels of U-II have been found to be elevated in some but not all studies in such patients. However, the functional consequences of activation of the U-II system in patients with CHF, assessed by direct administration of exogenous U-II, have not been previously determined.

Methods and Results— We compared the effect of iontophoresed U-II on skin microvascular tone in normal subjects and patients with CHF, assessed with the use of laser Doppler velocimetry. U-II mediated a dose-dependent vasodilator response in normal subjects (baseline, 137.9±52; U-II, 10 −12 mol/L, 145±134; U-II, 10 −9 mol/L, 712±179; U-II, 10 −7 mol/L, 943±139 arbitrary flux units [AFUs], P <0.0001). In contrast, a dose-dependent vasoconstrictor response was observed in patients with CHF (baseline, 336.1±129; U-II, 10 −12 mol/L, 317±131; U-II, 10 −9 mol/L, 129±137; U-II, 10 −7 mol/L, 22.4±130 AFUs, P <0.05). Differences in flow between normal subjects and patients with CHF were significant overall ( P <0.001, 2-way ANOVA) and at the U-II 10 −9 mol/L and U-II 10 −7 mol/L dose level by Student’s unpaired t test ( P <0.05, P <0.0001, respectively). In contrast, there was no significant difference between baseline blood flux and any dose of U-II in either group (or between groups) when the opposite polarity was applied.

Conclusions— In addition to direct effects on the myocardium, U-II may contribute to the increased peripheral vascular tone that is characteristic of human CHF. The present observations support the contention that the U-II system may be a potentially important target for pharmacological blockade in the treatment of this condition.