Effect of a reduced-fat diet with or without pravastatin on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

Pravastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

A detailed summary and meta-analysis of the dose-related effect of pravastatin on lipids is not available.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To assess the pharmacology of pravastatin by characterizing the dose-related effect and variability of the effect of pravastatin on the surrogate marker: low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol). The effect of pravastatin on morbidity and mortality is not the objective of this systematic review. Secondary objectives • To assess the dose-related effect and variability of effect of pravastatin on the following surrogate markers: total cholesterol; high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol); and triglycerides. • To assess the effect of pravastatin on withdrawals due to adverse effects.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to September 2021: CENTRAL (2021, Issue 8), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Bireme LILACS, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of pravastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered lipid data from placebo-controlled trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous data and withdrawal due to adverse effects (WDAEs) data as dichotomous data. We searched for WDAEs information from all trials. We assessed all trials using Cochrane's risk of bias tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-four RCTs evaluated the dose-related efficacy of pravastatin in 9771 participants. The participants were of any age, with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and pravastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over the doses of 5 mg to 160 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol, and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of pravastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Pravastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 21.7% to 31.9%, total cholesterol by 16.1% to 23.3%,and triglycerides by 5.8% to 20.0%. The certainty of evidence for these effects was judged to be moderate to high. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 3.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 4.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol. This represented a dose-response slope that was less than the other studied statins: atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. From other systematic reviews we conducted on statins for its effect to reduce LDL cholesterol, pravastatin is similar to fluvastatin, but has a decreased effect compared to atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin and cerivastatin. The effect of pravastatin compared to placebo on WADES has a risk ratio (RR) of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.03). The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pravastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with pravastatin because of the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 48.4% of the randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Statins Are Associated With Increased Insulin Resistance and Secretion

Objective

Statin treatment reduces the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but is associated with a modest increased risk of type 2 diabetes, especially in those with insulin resistance or prediabetes. Our objective was to determine the physiological mechanism for the increased type 2 diabetes risk.

Approach and Results

We conducted an open-label clinical trial of atorvastatin 40 mg daily in adults without known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes at baseline. The co-primary outcomes were changes at 10 weeks versus baseline in insulin resistance as assessed by steady-state plasma glucose during the insulin suppression test and insulin secretion as assessed by insulin secretion rate area under the curve (ISRAUC) during the graded-glucose infusion test. Secondary outcomes included glucose and insulin, both fasting and during oral glucose tolerance test. Of 75 participants who enrolled, 71 completed the study (median age 61 years, 37% women, 65% non-Hispanic White, median body mass index, 27.8 kg/m2). Atorvastatin reduced LDL (low-density lipoprotein)-cholesterol (median decrease 53%, P<0.001) but did not change body weight. Compared with baseline, atorvastatin increased insulin resistance (steady-state plasma glucose) by a median of 8% (P=0.01) and insulin secretion (ISRAUC) by a median of 9% (P<0.001). There were small increases in oral glucose tolerance test glucoseAUC (median increase, 0.05%; P=0.03) and fasting insulin (median increase, 7%; P=0.01).

Conclusions

In individuals without type 2 diabetes, high-intensity atorvastatin for 10 weeks increases insulin resistance and insulin secretion. Over time, the risk of new-onset diabetes with statin use may increase in individuals who become more insulin resistant but are unable to maintain compensatory increases in insulin secretion.

Effects of Pitavastatin on Insulin Sensitivity and Liver Fat: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Context

3-Hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely prescribed. Statins may have important metabolic effects on insulin sensitivity and liver fat, but limited studies have assessed these effects by using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, stable isotopes, and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for liver fat quantification.

Objective

To study the effects of pitavastatin on hepatic fat and insulin sensitivity.

Design

Six-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Setting

Academic clinical research center in Boston, Massachusetts.

Participants

Overweight, insulin-resistant men aged 40 to 65 years who had not received statin therapy for ≥1 year.

Interventions

Pitavastatin 4 mg or placebo daily.

Outcome

The primary endpoints were changes in insulin sensitivity measured by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp and liver fat measured by 1H MRS.

Results

Pitavastatin showed no effect on endogenous glucose production (ΔRa glucose 0.07 ± 0.07 vs 0.04 ± 0.07 mg/kg/min, pitavastatin vs placebo, P = 0.76) or insulin-stimulated glucose uptake during "low dose" (ΔM 0.1 ± 0.1 vs -0.3 ± 0.2 mg/kg/min, P = 0.11) and "high dose" (ΔM -0.5 ± 0.3 vs -0.7 ± 0.4 mg/kg/min, P = 0.70) euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps. There was also no effect of pitavastatin on fasting glucose, HbA1c, and 2-hour glucose after 75-g glucose challenge. There was also no change in liver fat fraction (-1 ± 1 vs -0 ± 1%, P = 0.56).

Conclusion

Compared with placebo, pitavastatin did not affect hepatic or whole-body insulin sensitivity, and it did not reduce liver fat.

Dietary interventions (plant sterols, stanols, omega-3 fatty acids, soy protein and dietary fibers) for familial hypercholesterolaemia

BACKGROUND

A cholesterol-lowering diet and several other dietary interventions have been suggested as a management approach either independently or as an adjuvant to drug therapy in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). However, a consensus has yet to be reached on the most appropriate dietary treatment. Plant sterols are commonly used in FH although patients may know them by other names like phytosterols or stanols.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether a cholesterol-lowering diet is more effective in reducing ischaemic heart disease and lowering cholesterol than no dietary intervention in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Further, to compare the efficacy of supplementing a cholesterol-lowering diet with either omega-3 fatty acids, soya proteins, plant sterols or plant stanols.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register, which is compiled from electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (updated with each new issue of The Cochrane Library), quarterly searches of MEDLINE and the prospective handsearching of one journal - Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. Most recent search of the Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register: 22 August 2013. We also searched PubMed to 05 February 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, both published and unpublished, where a cholesterol-lowering diet in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia has been compared to other forms of dietary treatment or to no dietary intervention were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the trial eligibility and risk of bias and one extracted the data, with independent verification of data extraction by a colleague.

MAIN RESULTS

In the 2014 update of the review, 15 trials have been included, with a total of 453 participants across seven comparison groups. The included trials had either a low or unclear risk of bias for most of the parameters used for risk assessment. Only short-term outcomes could be assessed due to the short duration of follow up in the included trials. None of the primary outcomes, (incidence of ischaemic heart disease, number of deaths and age at death) were evaluated in any of the included trials. No significant differences were noted for the majority of secondary outcomes for any of the planned comparisons. However, a significant difference was found for the following comparisons and outcomes: for the comparison between plant sterols and cholesterol-lowering diet (in favour of plant sterols), total cholesterol levels, mean difference 0.30 mmol/l (95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.48); decreased serum LDL cholesterol, mean difference -0.60 mmol/l (95% CI -0.89 to -0.31). Fasting serum HDL cholesterol levels were elevated, mean difference -0.04 mmol/l (95% CI -0.11 to 0.03) and serum triglyceride concentration was reduced, mean difference -0.03 mmol/l (95% CI -0.15 to -0.09), although these changes were not statistically significant. Similarly, guar gum when given as an add on therapy to bezafibrate reduced total cholesterol and LDL levels as compared to bezafibrate alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of a cholesterol-lowering diet, or any of the other dietary interventions suggested for familial hypercholesterolaemia, for the primary outcomes: evidence and incidence of ischaemic heart disease, number of deaths and age at death,due to the lack of data on these. Large, parallel, randomised controlled trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of a cholesterol-lowering diet and the addition of omega-3 fatty acids, plant sterols or stanols, soya protein, dietary fibers to a cholesterol-lowering diet.

Dietary treatment for familial hypercholesterolaemia

BACKGROUND

A cholesterol-lowering diet and several other dietary interventions have been suggested as a management approach either independently or as an adjuvant to drug therapy in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolemia. However, a consensus has yet to be reached on the most appropriate dietary treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether a cholesterol-lowering diet is more effective in reducing ischaemic heart disease and lowering cholesterol than no dietary intervention in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Further, to compare the efficacy of supplementing a cholesterol-lowering diet with either omega-3 fatty acids, soya proteins, plant sterols or plant stanols.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register.Most recent search of the Group's Inborn Errors of Metabolism Trials Register: 09 October 2009.We also searched PubMed till 01 June 2008.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials, both published and unpublished, where a cholesterol-lowering diet in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia has been compared to other forms of dietary treatment or to no dietary intervention were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the trial eligibility and methodological quality and one extracted the data, with independent verification of data extraction by a colleague.

MAIN RESULTS

In the present update, four new trials have been added making eleven trials with a total of 331 participants eligible for inclusion. Only short-term outcomes could be assessed due to the short duration of follow up in the included studies. None of the primary outcomes, (incidence of ischaemic heart disease, number of deaths and age at death) were evaluated in any of the included studies. No significant difference was noted for the majority of secondary outcomes for any of the planned comparisons. However, a significant difference was found only for the following comparison and outcome: total cholesterol levels for the comparison between plant sterols and cholesterol-lowering diet, mean difference 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.19 to 1.21).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

No conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of a cholesterol-lowering diet, or any of the other dietary interventions suggested for familial hypercholesterolaemia, due to the lack of adequate data. Large, parallel, randomised controlled trials are needed to investigate the effectiveness of a cholesterol-lowering diet and the addition of omega-3 fatty acids, plant sterols or stanols, soya protein to a cholesterol-lowering diet.

Rediscovering bile acid sequestrants

AIM

In the recently published The Justification for the Use of statins in Primary prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) mega-trial, rosuvastatin significantly reduced cardiovascular events at the expense of a small but significant increase in the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. The increased risk of new-onset diabetes was in keeping with a recent meta-analysis which suggested that statins, with the possible exception of pravastatin, marginally increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Although the net effect of rosuvastatin was obviously very positive, we hypothesized that the addition of a bile aid sequestrant to a statin would not only further decrease lipid levels and potentially further decrease cardiovascular events but also protect against the development of diabetes. This is particularly relevant because the bile acid sequestrant, colesevelam, has recently been approved for therapy of diabetes.

RESULTS

Colesevelam like other bile acid sequestrants lowers low-density lipoprotein levels by 16% and C-reactive protein by 22% beyond the reductions that occur with statin therapy alone. Bile acid sequestrants confer lipid-lowering, glucose-lowering, and anti-inflammatory benefits, and have been shown to reduce risk of cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, colesevelam should be the most effective and logical agent to add to a statin in the diabetic and insulin-resistant patient, because in addition to lowering cardiac risk it may prevent the development of diabetes, as well as improving glycaemic control in the established diabetic patient.

Effects of high-dose simvastatin therapy on glucose metabolism and ectopic lipid deposition in nonobese type 2 diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

Statins may exert pleiotropic effects on insulin action that are still controversial. We assessed effects of high-dose simvastatin therapy on peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity, as well as on ectopic lipid deposition in patients with hypercholesterolemia and type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center study. Twenty patients with type 2 diabetes received 80 mg simvastatin (BMI 29 +/- 4 kg/m2, age 55 +/- 6 years) or placebo (BMI 27 +/- 4 kg/m2, age 58 +/- 8 years) daily for 8 weeks and were compared with 10 healthy humans (control subjects; BMI 27 +/- 4 kg/m2, age 55 +/- 7 years). Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp tests combined with D-[6,6-d2]glucose infusion were used to assess insulin sensitivity (M) and endogenous glucose production (EGP). 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to quantify intramyocellular and hepatocellular lipids.

RESULTS

High-dose simvastatin treatment lowered plasma total and LDL cholesterol levels by approximately 33 and approximately 48% (P < 0.005) but did not affect M, intracellular lipid deposition in soleus and tibialis anterior muscles and liver, or basal and insulin-suppressed EGP. In simvastatin-treated patients, changes in LDL cholesterol related negatively to changes in M (r = -0.796, P < 0.01). Changes in fasting free fatty acids (FFAs) related negatively to changes in M (r = -0.840, P < 0.01) and positively to plasma retinol-binding protein-4 (r = 0.782, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose simvastatin treatment has no direct effects on whole-body or tissue-specific insulin action and ectopic lipid deposition. A reduction in plasma FFAs probably mediates alterations in insulin sensitivity in vivo.

No effect of simvastatin treatment on insulin sensitivity in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE

Statins, in addition to cholesterol lowering, have nonlipid effects on formation and progression of atheromatous plaque. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia may have detrimental influences on the arterial wall. Statins (may also) inhibit insulin signal transferring in vascular smooth cell cultures. However, their effect on insulin sensitivity remains controversial. Therefore, we decided to investigate the effect of simvastatin on insulin sensitivity in hypercholesterolemic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were divided into simvastatin group (n = 9; 4 females, 5 males; BMI 30.6 +/- 4 kg/m2; mean ages 57 +/- 6 years) and placebo group (n = 9; 4 females, 5 males; BMI 28 +/- 2.9 kg/m2; mean ages 49 +/- 10 years). Simvastatin (20 mg/day) or placebo were given for 2 months. Total and HDL cholesterol were measured and LDL cholesterol was calculated by Friedewald formula. Insulin sensitivity was determined by using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique [40 microU/m2/min insulin infusion rate; glucose disposal rate (M)= mg/kg/min] before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Plasma levels of total, LDL and HDL cholesterol decreased significantly in simvastatin group after treatment (p = 0.000, p = 0.000, and p = 0.048, respectively). Plasma levels of total cholesterol decreased significantly (p = 0.032), whereas LDL and HDL levels remained unchanged in placebo group. M value (mg/kg/min) decreased insignificantly in simvastatin group (4.32 +/- 1.57 vs. 3.71 +/- 1.91) and increased in placebo group (3.55 +/- 1.91 vs. 3.95 +/- 0.95).

CONCLUSION

Short-term simvastatin treatment did not affect insulin sensitivity determined by "gold standard" euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp method in hypercholesterolemic patients in this research. Further studies with simvastatin using higher doses and longer duration should be performed.

Dietary treatment for familial hypercholesterolaemia

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is an inherited disorder characterised by a raised blood cholesterol, the presence of xanthomatosis and premature ischaemic heart disease. The aim of treatment is the reduction of blood LDL cholesterol concentrations in order to reduce the risk of ischaemic heart disease. Current treatment is based on a cholesterol lowering diet alone or in combination with drug therapy. Many of the drugs found to be effective in treating adults with this disease are not licensed for use in children, therefore diet is the main treatment of children with familial hypercholesterolaemia. In addition to the cholesterol-lowering diet, several other dietary interventions have been suggested and consensus has yet to be reached on the most appropriate dietary treatment for children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence that in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia, a cholesterol lowering diet is more effective at lowering cholesterol and reducing incidence of ischaemic heart disease than no intervention or than other dietary interventions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Trials Register, a specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. Additional studies were identified from handsearching the Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease (from inception, 1978 to 2000) and from the reference lists of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both published and unpublished, where a cholesterol lowering diet in children and adults with familial hypercholesterolaemia has been compared to other forms of dietary treatment or to no dietary intervention. Trials which include patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia alongside patients with non-familial hypercholesterolaemia were only included if the group of familial patients was well defined and the results for these patients were available.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed the trial eligibility and methodological quality and one reviewer extracted the data, with independent verification of data extraction by a colleague.

MAIN RESULTS

Only short term outcomes could be assessed in this review due to the length of the five eligible studies. Compliance to treatment, quality of life, mortality and evidence of ischaemic or atheromatous disease were not assessed in the studies identified. No differences were found between the cholesterol-lowering diet and all other diets for all of the short term outcomes assessed.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

No conclusions can be made about the effectiveness of the cholesterol-lowering diet, or any of the other dietary interventions suggested for familial hypercholesterolaemia, due to the lack of adequate data. A large, parallel, randomised controlled trial is needed to investigate the effectiveness of the cholesterol-lowering diet and other dietary interventions for FH. It is also possible that data from trials including subjects with both familial and non-familial hypercholesterolaemia could alter the results of future updates of this review and until further evidence is available current dietary treatment of FH should continue to be observed and monitored with care.