Prostaglandins reduce the contractile responses to noradrenaline and angiotensin II in canine femoral arteries after but not before chronic inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis

Differential effects of losartan and candesartan on vasoconstrictor responses in the ratThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled The Cellular and Molecular Basis of Cardiovascular Dysfunction, Dhalla 70th Birthday Tribute

Losartan has been reported to have inhibitory effects on thromboxane (TP) receptor-mediated responses. In the present study, the effects of 2 nonpeptide angiotensin II (AT1) receptor antagonists, losartan and candesartan, on responses to angiotensin II, the thromboxane A2 mimic, U46619, and norepinephrine were investigated and compared in the pulmonary and systemic vascular beds of the intact-chest rat. In this study, intravenous injections of angiotensin II, U46619, and norepinephrine produced dose-related increases in pulmonary and systemic arterial pressure. Losartan and candesartan, in the doses studied, decreased or abolished responses to angiotensin II. Losartan, but not candesartan, and only in a higher dose, produced small, but statistically significant, reductions in pressor responses to U46619 and to norepinephrine in the pulmonary and systemic vascular beds. Furthermore, losartan significantly reduced arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation, whereas candesartan had no effect. Pressor responses to angiotensin II were not changed by thromboxane and alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonists, or by cyclooxygenase and NO synthase inhibitors. These results show that losartan and candesartan are potent selective AT1 receptor antagonists in the pulmonary and systemic vascular beds and that losartan can attenuate thromboxane and alpha-adrenergic responses when administered at a high dose, whereas candesartan in the highest dose studied had no effect on responses to U46619 or to norepinephrine. The present data show that the effects of losartan and candesartan on vasoconstrictor responses are different and that pulmonary and systemic pressor responses to angiotensin II are not modulated or mediated by the release of cyclooxygenase products, activation of TP receptors, or the release of NO in the anesthetized rat.

Nitric oxide deficiency promotes vascular side effects of cyclooxygenase inhibitors

The cardiovascular safety of COX-2 selective and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has recently been called into question. The factors that predispose to adverse events by NSAIDs are unknown. Because patients with arthritis have decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, the in vivo effects of NSAIDs on murine vascular tone and platelet activity in the presence or absence of NO were examined. Here, we show that acute hypertensive and prothrombotic activities of the COX-2-selective inhibitor celecoxib are revealed only after in vivo inhibition of NO generation. The nonselective NSAID indomethacin was hypertensive but antithrombotic when NO was absent. In vitro myography of aortic rings confirmed that vasoconstriction required inhibition of both NOS and COX-2 and was abolished by supplementation with exogenous NO. These data indicate that NO suppresses vascular side effects of NSAIDs, suggesting that risk will be greatest in patients with impaired vascular function associated with decreased NO bioavailability.

Functional characteristics of the coronary microcirculation

For over 50 years, it has been recognized that coronary blood flow is precisely matched to cardiac metabolism. The interactions which govern this matching remain unknown. In the current review, 3 specific aspects of coronary flow regulation will be discussed: Specialization of function in different microvascular domains, influence of cardiac region on microvascular function and the interactions of vasoactive agents in control of coronary blood flow. Each level of the coronary microcirculation is affected by different physical and chemical forces within the heart. These forces place special demands on these vessels and are in turn met by specialized vasodilator responses, including metabolic and flow-mediated vasodilation. Perfusion of the heart is also profoundly affected by the region perfused. The endocardium is affected by forces, notably cardiac contraction, in a different manner than the epicardium. Thus, the microcirculation has specialized to meet these demands. Finally, the factors determining microvascular tone appear to be coordinated such that the loss of any individual dilator, such as nitric oxide, can be compensated for by the increased contribution of another, such as adenosine. This interplay may serve to protect the heart from ischemia during the early phases of coronary vascular disease when individual dilators may be impaired.