Are selective endothelin A receptor antagonists better than mixed antagonists?

Endothelin-1-Rho kinase interactions impair lung structure and cause pulmonary hypertension after bleomycin exposure in neonatal rat pups

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the chronic lung disease associated with premature birth, characterized by impaired vascular and alveolar growth. In neonatal rats bleomycin decreases lung growth and causes pulmonary hypertension (PH), which is poorly responsive to nitric oxide. In the developing lung, through Rho kinase (ROCK) activation, ET-1 impairs endothelial cell function; however, whether ET-1-ROCK interactions contribute to impaired vascular and alveolar growth in experimental BPD is unknown. Neonatal rats were treated daily with intraperitoneal bleomycin with and without selective ETA (BQ123/BQ610) and ETB (BQ788) receptor blockers, nonselective ET receptor blocker (ETRB) (bosentan), or fasudil (ROCK inhibitor). At day 14, lungs were harvested for morphometrics, and measurements of Fulton's index (RV/LV+S), medial wall thickness (MWT), and vessel density. Lung ET-1 protein and ROCK activity (phospho-MYPT-1:total MYPT-1 ratio) were also measured by Western blot analysis. Bleomycin increased lung ET-1 protein expression by 65%, RV/LV+S by 60%, mean linear intercept (MLI) by 212%, and MWT by 140% and decreased radial alveolar count (RAC) and vessel density by 40 and 44%, respectively (P < 0.01 for each comparison). After bleomycin treatment, fasudil and bosentan partially restored RAC and vessel density and decreased MLI, RV/LV+S, and MWT to normal values. Bleomycin increased ROCK activity by 120%, which was restored to normal values by bosentan but not selective ETRB. We conclude that ET-1-ROCK interactions contribute to decreased alveolar and vascular growth and PH in experimental BPD. We speculate that nonselective ETRB and ROCK inhibitors may be effective in the treatment of infants with BPD and PH.

Inhibition of endothelin receptors in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: does selectivity matter?

Treatment options for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have considerably improved in the past few years. Endothelin (ET)-receptor antagonism has been established as a first-line option for the majority of PAH patients. Endothelin-receptor antagonists (ETRAs) comprise sulfonamide and non-sulfonamide agents with different affinities for ET-receptor subtypes (ET_A and ET_B), and the focus of development has shifted from drugs with less selectivity to those with high selectivity. There is ongoing debate as to whether selective or non-selective ET-receptor antagonism is more beneficial in the treatment of PAH. This paper reviews the current evidence from experimental and clinical studies obtained from a thorough literature search focusing on the three marketed drugs bosentan, sitaxentan, and ambrisentan. A clinically meaningful difference among the three approved ETRAs with respect to their ET-receptor selectivity could not be demonstrated to date. Therefore, in clinical practice, other features are likely to be of greater relevance when considering treatment, such as the potential for serious drug–drug interactions, convenience of dosing schedule, or rates of limiting side effects. These characteristics bear more relation to the chemical or pharmacological properties of the drugs than to receptor selectivity itself.

Dual ET(A)/ET(B) vs. selective ET(A) endothelin receptor antagonism in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Since the identification of endothelin as a key mediator in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the pharmacologic control of the activated endothelin system with endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRA) has been a major therapeutic achievement for the treatment of patients with PAH. To date, dual ET(A)/ET(B) and selective ET(A) receptor antagonists have clinically been evaluated. To answer the question of whether selective or dual ETRA is preferable in patients with PAH, experimental and clinical data with relevance to the pulmonary circulation are reviewed in this article. Whereas experimental and clinical data provide unambiguous evidence that ET(A) receptors mediate the detrimental effects of ET-1, such as vasoconstriction and cell proliferation, the elucidation of the role of ET(B) receptors has been more complex. It has been shown that there is a subpopulation of ET(B) receptors on smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts mediating vasoconstriction and proliferation. On the contrary, there is clear evidence that endothelial ET(B) receptors continue to mediate vasodilation, vasoprotection and ET-1 clearance despite the pathology associated with pulmonary hypertension. More difficult to assess is the net effect of these mechanisms in patients to be treated with ETRA. When considering the available data from controlled clinical trials, nonselectivity does not appear to carry a relevant clinical benefit for the treatment of patients with PAH when compared with selective ET(A) receptor antagonism.

Novel Benzo[1,4]diazepin-2-one Derivatives as Endothelin Receptor Antagonists

Since its discovery in 1988 by Yanagisawa et al., endothelin (ET), a potent vasoconstrictor, has been widely implicated in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal diseases. Many research groups have embarked on the discovery and development of ET receptor antagonists for the treatment of such diseases. While several compounds, e.g., ambrisentan 2, are in late clinical trials for various indications, one compound (bosentan, Tracleer) is being marketed to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension. Inspired by the structure of ambrisentan 2, we designed a novel class of ET receptor antagonists based on a 1,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-2-one scaffold. Here, we report on the preparation as well as the in vitro and in vivo structure-activity relationships of these derivatives. Potent dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonists with affinities in the low nanomolar range have been identified. In addition, several compounds efficiently reduced arterial blood pressure after oral administration to Dahl salt sensitive rats. In this animal model, the efficacy of the benzo[e][1,4]diazepin-2-one derivative rac-39au was superior to that of racemic ambrisentan, rac-2.

Endothelin ETA receptor antagonist did not affect development of tolerance to glyceryl trinitrate in rat

Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), extensively used for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, is associated with rapid development of tolerance. The exact mechanism responsible for tolerance development to GTN is still not known. Recently, it has been demonstrated that GTN tolerance is associated with increased expression of endothelin (ET). This study was carried out to determine the effect of ET(A) receptor antagonist, BMS182874, on the development of tolerance to GTN in urethane-anaesthetized rats. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously recorded in vehicle- and BMS182874 (3 mg kg(-1), i.v.)-treated rats. GTN was infused at the rate of 10 microg min(-1), intravenously for 4 h. Tolerance to GTN was determined using challenge doses of GTN (10, 30 and 90 microg, i.v.). GTN produced a fall in DBP, SBP and an increase in HR. In vehicle-treated rats, the fall in SBP before induction of GTN tolerance was 28 +/- 2, 43 +/- 4 and 52 +/- 4 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. However, following GTN infusion (10 microg min(-1), i.v. for 4 h) a rapid development of tolerance was observed and the fall in SBP was 1 +/- 1, 9 +/- 4 and 15 +/- 4 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. Similarly, in BMS182874-treated rats the fall in SBP in non-tolerant rats was 28 +/- 4, 42 +/- 4 and 48 +/- 5 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. In BMS182874-treated rats following GTN infusion (10 microg min(-1), i.v. for 4 h) a rapid development of tolerance was observed and the fall in SBP was 4 +/- 3, 10 +/- 2 and 13 +/- 4 mmHg with 10, 30 and 90 microg GTN, respectively. The decrease in DBP and SBP in vehicle- and BMS182874-treated GTN-tolerant rats was statistically similar. These results suggest that ET(A) receptor antagonist BMS182874 did not affect development of tolerance to GTN in rats.

Possible Therapeutic Role of Endothelin Antagonists in Cardiovascular Disease

Endothelin-1 is an endothelium-derived compound that exerts a variety of hemodynamic and structural alterations in the cardiovascular and pulmonary circuits. The endothelin system is activated in an assortment of disorders and disease states, such as systemic hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, atherosclerosis, acute coronary syndromes, and congestive heart failure. The actions of endothelin are mediated by two types of receptors: ETA and ETB, which are widely distributed in the cardiovascular system. The complexity of biophysical effects mediated by these two types of receptors dictates the therapeutic implications, that is, selective (ETA) versus dual (ETA/ ETB) receptor antagonism. Preliminary experimental and clinical studies reveal a role played by endothelin as a pathogenetic substance and, conversely, a possible role for endothelin antagonism in clinical medicine.

ETA and ETB receptor function in pancreatitis-associated microcirculatory failure, inflammation, and parenchymal injury

The role of endothelin (ET)A and ETB receptor function in experimental pancreatitis is still not fully understood. Using a rat model of sodium taurocholate-induced pancreatitis and intravital microscopy, we therefore studied whether selective inhibition of ETA receptor function or combined ETA and ETB receptor blockade affects the development of pancreatitis-associated microcirculatory failure, inflammation, and parenchymal injury. Pretreatment with 10 mg/kg body wt of a combined ETA/B receptor antagonist, which is thought to mediate a simultaneous inhibition of both receptors, did not attenuate the pancreatitis-induced microcirculatory failure, inflammatory response, and parenchymal tissue injury. In contrast, pretreatment with a low concentration of the combined ETA/B receptor antagonist (4 mg/kg body wt), which predominantly inhibits the ETA receptor, revealed an improvement of some microcirculatory disorders and a significant attenuation of leukocyte recruitment and tissue injury. Furthermore, pretreatment with a selective ETA receptor antagonist (1 microg/kg body wt) almost abolished pancreatitis-associated capillary constriction, restored functional capillary density, and, consequently, improved overall nutritive perfusion. Importantly, the maintenance of an appropriate microcirculation by selective ETA receptor inhibition was accompanied by a significant attenuation of the inflammation-associated leukocytic response and by a marked reduction of parenchymal injury. Thus our study indicates that pancreatitis-associated development of microcirculatory failure, inflammation, and parenchymal injury is caused by ETs coupling onto the ETA receptor, which therefore may represent a promising target for novel strategies in the treatment of pancreatitis.