High-dose recombinant human erythropoietin stimulates reticulocyte production in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is a common problem experienced by critically-ill people. Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has been used as a pharmacologic strategy when the blunted response of endogenous erythropoietin has been reported in critically-ill people. The use of ESAs becomes more important where adverse clinical outcomes of transfusing blood products is a limitation. However, this indication for ESAs is not licensed by regulatory authorities and is called off-label use. Recent studies concern the harm of ESAs in a critical care setting.

OBJECTIVES

To focus on harms in assessing the effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), alone or in combination, compared with placebo, no treatment or a different active treatment regimen when administered off-label to critically-ill people.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO via OvidSP, CINAHL, all evidence-based medicine (EBM) reviews including IPA and SCI-Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index- Science, BIOSIS Previews and TOXLINE up to February 2017. We also searched trials registries, checked reference lists of relevant studies and tracked their citations by using SciVerse Scopus.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies, which compared scheduled systemic administration of ESAs versus other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically-ill people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened and evaluated the eligibility of retrieved records, extracted data and assessed the risks of bias and quality of the included studies. We resolved differences in opinion by consensus or by involving a third review author. We assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table. We used fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity between studies. We fitted three-level hierarchical Bayesian models to calculate overall treatment effect estimates.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 27,865 records identified, 39 clinical trials and 14 observational studies, including a total of 945,240 participants, were eligible for inclusion. Five studies are awaiting classification. Overall, we found 114 adverse events in 33 studies (30 RCTs and three observational studies), and mortality was reported in 41 studies (32 RCTs and nine observational studies). Most studies were at low to moderate risk of bias for harms outcomes. However, overall harm assessment and reporting were of moderate to low quality in the RCTs, and of low quality in the observational studies. We downgraded the GRADE quality of evidence for venous thromboembolism and mortality to very low and low, respectively, because of risk of bias, high inconsistency, imprecision and limitations of study design.It is unclear whether there is an increase in the risk of any adverse events (Bayesian risk ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.21; 3099 participants; 9 studies; low-quality evidence) or venous thromboembolism (Bayesian RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.41; 18,917 participants; 18 studies; very low-quality evidence).There was a decreased risk of mortality with off-label use of ESAs in critically-ill people (Bayesian RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.92; 930,470 participants; 34 studies; low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Low quality of evidence suggests that off-label use of ESAs may reduce mortality in a critical care setting. There was a lack of high-quality evidence about the harm of ESAs in critically-ill people. The information for biosimilar ESAs is less conclusive. Most studies neither evaluated ESAs' harm as a primary outcome nor predefined adverse events. Any further studies of ESA should address the quality of evaluating, recording and reporting of adverse events.

Ceruloplasmin and Hypoferremia: Studies in Burn and Non-Burn Trauma Patients

OBJECTIVE

Normal iron handling appears to be disrupted in critically ill patients leading to hypoferremia that may contribute to systemic inflammation. Ceruloplasmin (Cp), an acute phase reactant protein that can convert ferrous iron to its less reactive ferric form facilitating binding to ferritin, has ferroxidase activity that is important to iron handling. Genetic absence of Cp decreases iron export resulting in iron accumulation in many organs. The objective of this study was to characterize iron metabolism and Cp activity in burn and non-burn trauma patients to determine if changes in Cp activity are a potential contributor to the observed hypoferremia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Under Brooke Army Medical Center Institutional Review Board approved protocols, serum or plasma was collected from burn and non-burn trauma patients on admission to the ICU and at times up to 14 days and measured for indices of iron status, Cp protein and oxidase activity and cytokines.

RESULTS

Burn patients showed evidence of anemia and normal or elevated ferritin levels. Plasma Cp oxidase activity in burn and trauma patients were markedly lower than controls on admission and increased to control levels by day 3, particularly in burn patients. Plasma cytokines were elevated throughout the 14 days study along with evidence of an oxidative stress. No significant differences in soluble transferrin receptor were noted among groups on admission, but levels in burn patients were lower than controls for the first 5 days after injury.

CONCLUSION

This study further established the hypoferremia and inflammation associated with burns and trauma. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show an early decrease in Cp oxidase activity in burn and non-burn trauma patients. The results support the hypothesis that transient loss of Cp activity contributes to hypoferremia and inflammation. Further studies are warranted to determine if decreased Cp activity increases the risk of iron-induced injury following therapeutic interventions such as transfusions with blood that has undergone prolonged storage in trauma resuscitation.

Impact of erythropoietin on intensive care unit patients

Anemia is common in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are mainstays of their treatment and can be life-saving. Allogeneic blood components inherently bear risks of infection and immune reactions. Although these risks are rare in developed countries, recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEpo) and other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been considered alternative anti-anemia treatment options. As summarized herein, however, most of the clinical studies suggest that ESAs are not usually advisable in ICU patients unless approved indications exist (e.g., renal disease). First, ESAs act in a delayed way, inducing an increase in reticulocytes only after a lag of 3-4 days. Second, many critically ill patients present with ESA resistance as inflammatory mediators impair erythropoietic cell proliferation and iron availability. Third, the ESA doses used for treatment of ICU patients are very high. Fourth, ESAs are not legally approved for general use in ICU patients. Solely in distinct cases, such as Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse allogeneic blood transfusions due to religious beliefs, ESAs may be considered an exceptional therapy.

Safety of off-label erythropoiesis stimulating agents in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are used to treat anemia in critically ill patients. This indication is off-label, because it is not licensed by regulatory authorities. Recently ESAs were suspected to harm critically ill patients. Our objective was to assess the safety of ESAs in off-label indications in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Eleven databases were searched up to April 2012. We considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled observational studies in any language that compared off-label ESAs treatment with other effective interventions, placebo or no treatment in critically ill patients. Two authors independently screened and evaluated retrieved records, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and quality of reporting.

RESULTS

We used frequentist and Bayesian models to combine studies, and performed sensitivity and subgroup analyses. From 12,888 citations, we included 48 studies (34 RCTs; 14 observational), involving 944,856 participants. Harm reporting was of medium to low quality. There was no statistically significant increased risk of adverse events in general, serious adverse events, the most frequently reported adverse events, and death in critically ill patients treated with ESAs. These results were robust against risk of bias and analysis methods. There is evidence that ESAs increase the risk of clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events, and there is some less certain evidence that ESAs might increase the risk for venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill patients, administration of ESAs is associated with a significant increase in clinically relevant thrombotic vascular events but not with other frequently reported adverse events and death.

The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the intensive care unit

Anemia is common in critically ill patients, but treatment with red blood cell transfusions can have unwanted effects. Limiting the occurrence and severity of anemia by using erythropoietic agents (iron and/or recombinant erythropoietin), therefore, remains an attractive option during the intensive care unit stay but also after hospital discharge. Moreover, these agents may have additional beneficial properties. In this article the authors review the rationale for the administration of iron and/or erythropoietin in critically ill patients.

Lipopolysaccharide interference in erythropoiesis in mice

Anaemia is a common problem in septic patients. We tested whether lipopolysaccharide suppressed erythropoiesis and interfered with erythropoietin. Male mice (strain C57BL/6, n = 76) were injected Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (serotype O127:B8; 20 mg.kg(-1) intraperitoneally) or vehicle, followed by either erythropoietin (5000 IU.kg(-1) intraperitoneally) or vehicle, and killed after 24 or 72 h. Femur bone marrow cells were stained for Ter-119, CD71 and C-Kit antigen using specific flow cytometry gates for proerythroblasts, basophilic, polychromatic and orthochromatic erythroblasts, and peripheral blood reticulocytes were counted. Erythropoietin stimulated erythropoiesis, as evidenced by increased reticulocytes after 72 h by 197% and proerythroblasts by 50% (p < 0.05). Lipopolysaccharide alone decreased proerythroblasts by 53% and basophilic erythroblasts by 75% (p < 0.05). Orthochromatic erythroblasts doubled after lipopolysaccharide exposure (p < 0.05) without any increase in reticulocytes. Lipopolysaccharide completely suppressed erythropoietin's stimulatory effects and evoked a maturation block at the late stage of erythropoiesis. Lipopolysaccharide could cause anaemia in sepsis.

Transfusion protocol in trauma

Blood and blood components are considered drugs because they are used in the treatment of diseases. As with any drug, adverse effects may occur, necessitating careful consideration of therapy. Like any other therapeutic decision, the need for transfusion should be considered on the basis of risks and benefits and alternative treatments available to avoid over- and under-transfusion. This review is focused on the blood transfusion protocol in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. Besides, issues related to emergency and massive transfusion have also been elaborated. We conducted a comprehensive MEDLINE search and reviewed the relevant literature, with particular reference to emergency medical care in trauma.

Bench to bedside: A role for erythropoietin in sepsis

Sepsis is the systemic inflammatory response to infection and can result in multiple organ dysfunction syndrome with associated high mortality, morbidity and health costs. Erythropoietin is a well-established treatment for the anaemia of renal failure due to its anti-apoptotic effects on red blood cells and their precursors. The extra-haemopoietic actions of erythropoietin include vasopressor, anti-apoptotic, cytoprotective and immunomodulating actions, all of which could prove beneficial in sepsis. Attenuation of organ dysfunction has been shown in several animal models and its vasopressor effects have been well characterised in laboratory and clinical settings. Clinical trials of erythropoietin in single organ disorders have suggested promising cytoprotective effects, and while no randomised trials have been performed in patients with sepsis, good quality data exist from studies on anaemia in critically ill patients, giving useful information of its pharmacokinetics and potential for harm. An observational cohort study examining the microvascular effects of erythropoietin is underway and the evidence would support further phase II and III clinical trials examining this molecule as an adjunctive treatment in sepsis.

Removal of erythropoietin from anaemia trauma practice guideline does not increase red blood cell transfusions and decreases hospital utilization costs

INTRODUCTION

We previously demonstrated that utilization of erythropoietin (r-EPO) did not significantly reduce blood utilization in trauma patients. We undertook this study to analyze blood utilization 1 year after r-EPO removal from our trauma service anaemia practice management guideline.

METHODS

Electronic records of patients admitted to the trauma service were retrospectively reviewed for units of packed red blood cells (pRBCs) transfused and for units of r-EPO administered 12 months before the initiation of an anaemia practice guideline (PRE), 12 months during the use of an anaemia guideline (GUIDE), and 12 months following removal of r-EPO from the guideline (POST). Hospital acquisition cost was also reviewed for the respective time periods. Nominal data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and interval data were compared using ANOVA followed by Tukey's test where appropriate. Results were considered significant for P<0.05.

RESULTS

Over the 3-year study period, 4881 patients were admitted to the trauma service and included in this study. The hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and units of pRBC transfused were similar among all three groups. Group I (PRE) received a total of 228 doses of r-EPO at a cost of $102,600. Group II (GUIDE) received a total of 410 doses at a cost of $184,500. Group III (POST) received 28 doses of r-EPO at a cost of $12,600.

CONCLUSION

Removal of erythropoietin from our trauma service anaemia practice management guideline did not result in increased blood utilization. However, it yielded a hospital acquisition cost savings of $171,900.

Lipopolysaccharide evokes resistance to erythropoiesis induced by the long-acting erythropoietin analogue darbepoetin alfa in rats

BACKGROUND

Anemia is common in patients with sepsis but its mechanism is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that effects on erythropoiesis evoked by darbepoetin alfa (DA), a long-acting erythropoietin analog, are diminished by lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

METHODS

We performed a prospective, controlled, randomized animal study (male Lewis rats n = 44). The interventions we used were intraperitoneal injection of Escherichia coli LPS (10 mg/kg) or vehicle followed by either DA (25 microg/kg) or vehicle (four experimental groups). Blood and reticulocyte counts and variables of iron metabolism were measured at baseline and 3 and 14 days after interventions.

RESULTS

Animals treated with DA alone showed an eightfold increase in reticulocyte count from baseline on Day 3, whereas no increase was seen in animals administered LPS or LPS/DA. On Day 14, the red blood cell count and hemoglobin concentration had increased by approximately 10% from baseline (P < 0.001) in the DA group but had decreased after LPS on Days 3 and 14 (P < 0.05) and in animals administered LPS/DA. Consumption of iron was seen on Day 3 in the DA group but not after LPS or LPS/DA combined. Values of ferritin and transferrin did not change between groups.

CONCLUSION

LPS abolishes erythropoiesis and iron use evoked by DA and this is accompanied by a decrease in hemoglobin concentration and red blood cell concentration. Accordingly, endotoxin suppresses DAs ability to increase erythropoiesis.

[Is there still a role for recombinant erythropoietin in the management of anaemia of critical illness?]

There is a high prevalence of anaemia among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), and it may have a negative effect on patient's outcome. The most common treatment for anaemia in the ICU patient is allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT), yet it has been found to be a risk factor associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality in critical care patients. As a reduction of erythropoietin secretion and action is observed in most ICU patients, the administration of (rHuEPO) has emerged as a therapeutic option. Unfortunately, the results from different studies show that rHuEPO treatment results in a small reduction of ABT requirements when "restrictive" transfusion criteria are applied, which has only been supported by three of the studies. Yet this did not result in a decreased mortality rate, except for patients with a diagnosis on admission of trauma in two studies, even though one study reported a dose-dependent increase of thrombotic vascular events among patients without thromboprophylaxis. Altogether, clinical data suggest a role for rHuEPO in the treatment of anaemia in trauma patients, especially in those sustaining neurotrauma, whereas for non-trauma patients without an approved indication, rHuEPO administration is an expensive approach, does not seem to improve outcome, and might result in serious adverse effects. Consequently, more basic and clinical studies are required to ascertain which patients are more likely to benefit from these treatments, as well as to identify the optimal doses and administration schedules, and iron administration.

Anemia of critical illness

Anemia of critical illness, a commonly encountered clinical situation, is hematologically similar to that of chronic anemia, except that the onset is generally sudden. The etiology is usually multifactorial, occurring as a consequence of direct inhibitory effects of inflammatory cytokines, erythropoietin deficiency, blunted erythropoietic response, blood loss, nutritional deficiencies, and renal insufficiency. Although anemia is not well tolerated by critically ill patients, aggressive treatment of anemia can be just as detrimental as no treatment. Different types of anemia may coexist in a patient in the intensive care unit, making diagnosis and differentiation among these anemias complex, therefore requiring good diagnostic skills. Although several therapeutic options are available to treat anemia, critically ill patients often receive a transfusion, and yet, most recent studies indicate that blood transfusions in critically ill patients are associated with worse outcomes, including higher morbidity and mortality. These studies have generated interest in the administration of exogenous erythropoietin and iron therapy. Unfortunately, the accurate determination of iron status can be a rather difficult task, an undertaking that is made even more difficult by the presence of comorbid conditions that can affect the commonly used parameters for guiding iron therapy. The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents is rapidly gaining acceptance, although they also present potential problems of their own.

Anemia in the Critically Ill Patient

Anemia in critically ill patients has been described as an acute form of anemia of inflammatory disease and is characterized by a blunted erythropoietic response due in part to proinflammatory mediators. Management of anemia in critically ill patients is a complex issue and is best approached via a multiprofessional team regarding the use of allogenic blood, iron, nutritional therapy, and erythropoietic agents. Indiscriminant, ``routine'' red blood cell transfusions may not only be unnecessary, but may pose unnecessary risk to the intensive care unit patient. Most intensive care unit patients can tolerate lower hemoglobin/hematocrit concentrations than the typically accepted ``10/30 rule.'' Lower transfusion triggers with an overall transfusion strategy is warranted in the intensive care unit patient. The use of recombinant human erythropoietic agents may not be necessary with appropriate transfusion practices.

Erythropoietin improves skeletal muscle microcirculation and tissue bioenergetics in a mouse sepsis model

Introduction

The relationship between oxygen delivery and consumption in sepsis is impaired, suggesting a microcirculatory perfusion defect. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) regulates erythropoiesis and also exerts complex actions promoting the maintenance of homeostasis of the organism under stress. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that rHuEPO could improve skeletal muscle capillary perfusion and tissue oxygenation in sepsis.

Methods

Septic mice in three experiments received rHu-EPO 400 U/kg subcutaneously 18 hours after cecal ligation and perforation (CLP). The first experiment measured the acute effects of rHuEPO on hemodynamics, blood counts, and arterial lactate level. The next two sets of experiments used intravital microscopy to observe capillary perfusion and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) fluorescence post-CLP after treatment with rHuEPO every 10 minutes for 40 minutes and at 6 hours. Perfused capillary density during a three-minute observation period and NADH fluorescence were measured.

Results

rHuEPO did not have any effects on blood pressure, lactate level, or blood cell numbers. CLP mice demonstrated a 22% decrease in perfused capillary density compared to the sham group (28.5 versus 36.6 capillaries per millimeter; p < 0.001). Treatment of CLP mice with rHuEPO resulted in an immediate and significant increase in perfused capillaries in the CLP group at all time points compared to baseline from 28.5 to 33.6 capillaries per millimeter at 40 minutes; p < 0.001. A significant increase in baseline NADH, suggesting tissue hypoxia, was noted in the CLP mice compared to the sham group (48.3 versus 43.9 fluorescence units [FU]; p = 0.03) and improved with rHuEPO from 48.3 to 44.4 FU at 40 minutes (p = 0.02). Six hours after treatment with rHuEPO, CLP mice demonstrated a higher mean perfused capillary density (39.4 versus 31.7 capillaries per millimeter; p < 0.001) and a lower mean NADH fluorescence as compared to CLP+normal saline mice (49.4 versus 52.7 FU; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

rHuEPO produced an immediate increase in capillary perfusion and decrease in NADH fluorescence in skeletal muscle. Thus, it appears that rHuEPO improves tissue bioenergetics, which is sustained for at least six hours in this murine sepsis model.

[Prevalence and treatment of anemia in critically ill patients]

Anemia is a common condition among medical and surgical patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and generally has a multifactorial origin. In order to avoid the deleterious effects of anemia, 40% of ICU patients receive allogenic blood transfusion (ABT). This figure increases up to 70% if the ICU stay is longer than 7 days. However, ABT is associated with a dose-dependent increase in morbidity and mortality. In contrast, the administration of exogenous erythropoietin plus iron supplements, especially iv iron, improves anemia and reduces ABT requirements, although it does not reduce mortality. To ascertain whether treatment of anemia in the critically ill with exogenous erythropoietin and iron might improve outcomes and to optimize drug administration schedules and dosage, further studies with sufficient statistical power and adequate follow-up are warranted.

Blood management: a primer for clinicians

Blood transfusions are common in the hospital setting. Despite the large commitment of resources to the delivery of blood components, many clinicians have only a vague understanding of the complexities associated with blood management and transfusion therapy. The purpose of this primer is to broaden the awareness of health care practitioners in terms of the risks versus benefits of blood transfusions, their economics, and alternative treatments. By developing and implementing comprehensive blood management programs, hospitals can promote safe and clinically effective blood utilization practices. The cornerstones of blood management programs are the implementation of evidence-based transfusion guidelines to reduce variability in transfusion practice, and the employment of multidisciplinary teams to study, implement, and monitor local blood management strategies. Pharmacists can play a key role in blood management programs by providing technical expertise as well as oversight and monitoring of pharmaceutical agents used to reduce the need for allogeneic blood.

Erythropoietin-receptor agonists in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Anemia and the need for red blood cell transfusions are common among patients admitted to intensive care units. Erythropoietin has been used to decrease the need for transfusions; however, its ability to improve clinical outcomes is unknown. We evaluated the effect of erythropoietin-receptor agonists on clinically important outcomes, including mortality, length of stay in hospital or intensive care unit, ventilator use, transfusion requirements and major adverse events.

METHODS

To identify relevant studies, we searched electronic databases covering 1950 to 2007 (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Scopus database). We also searched conference proceedings and grey literature sources. We selected all randomized controlled trials involving critically ill patients that compared an erythropoietin-receptor agonist with a placebo or no intervention. No language restrictions were considered. Data were extracted using a standardized extraction template. We used a fixed effects model to calculate all summary measures of treatment effects.

RESULTS

Of 673 identified records, 9 studies that investigated erythropoietin alpha met the eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis. Erythropoietin, compared with placebo or no intervention, had no statistically significant effect on overall mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.05, I2 = 0%). The treatment and control groups did not differ in the length of stay in hospital or intensive care unit, or in the duration of mechanical ventilation, in the 3 studies that reported these outcomes. Erythropoietin, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the odds of a patient receiving at least 1 transfusion (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.84, I2 = 54.7%). The mean number of units of blood transfused per patient was decreased by 0.41 units in the erythropoietin group (95% CI 0.10-0.74, I2 = 79.2%). Most of the included studies were performed before the widespread adoption of a restrictive transfusion strategy. Only 1 study provided detailed reports of adverse events, and none of the studies systematically evaluated all patients for venous thromboembolism.

INTERPRETATION

At this time, we do not recommend the routine use of erythropoietin-receptor agonists in critically ill patients. The reduction in red blood cell transfusions per patient was very small, and there is insufficient evidence to determine whether this intervention results in clinically important benefits with acceptable risks.

Anemia in critical care patients: incidence, etiology, impact, management, and use of treatment guidelines and protocols

PURPOSE

The incidence, etiology, impact, and management of anemia in critical care patients and the development of treatment guidelines and protocols for the management of anemia in this patient population are discussed.

SUMMARY

Most patients in intensive care units develop anemia as a result of blood losses, nutritional deficiencies, hemolysis, myelosuppression, renal insufficiency, inflammation, infection, or another disease process. Anemia can have an adverse impact on critically ill patients with severe ischemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease and patients undergoing surgery. The use of blood conservation measures and restrictive blood transfusion strategies can circumvent problems associated with transfusion. Epoetin alfa increases hemoglobin concentrations and reduces the need for transfusion in critical care patients, including surgical patients with large anticipated blood losses. Epoetin alfa also appears to be effective for managing anemia in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Iron supplementation is needed by most patients receiving erythropoietic therapy. Iron supplementation without erythropoietic therapy is inadequate to correct anemia unrelated to iron deficiency. Concerns have been raised about a possible increased risk for infection when parenteral iron therapy is used in critical care patients. Developing treatment guidelines or protocols for managing anemia in critical care patients can minimize the need for transfusions and improve prescribing of erythropoietic therapy.

CONCLUSION

Epoetin alfa can play an important role in managing anemia in critical care patients, thereby minimizing patient exposure to transfusion-related risks and optimizing the use of the limited blood supply. There is currently no data available for use of darbepoetin in this manner.

Anemia and red blood cell transfusion in the critically ill

Critically ill patients are anemic early in their intensive care unit (ICU) course. As a consequence of this anemia they receive a large number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. There is little evidence that "routine" transfusion of stored allogeneic RBCs is beneficial to critically ill patients and may in fact be associated with worse clinical outcomes. It is clear that most critically ill patients can tolerate hemoglobin levels as low as 7 g/dl and therefore a more conservative approach to RBC transfusion is warranted. Strategies to minimize loss of blood and increase the production of RBCs are also important in the management of all critically ill patients.

Erythropoietic response to two epoetin alfa regimens in critically ill patients: a pilot study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the erythropoietic responses and tolerability of two recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) regimens.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, multicenter study.

SETTING

Three multidisciplinary intensive care units in Québec, Canada.

PATIENTS

Sixty critically ill patients.

INTERVENTION

The first 30 patients received EPO 40,000 U/week (group A); the next 30 received 40,000 U twice/week (group B).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Percent change from baseline in reticulocyte count and hemoglobin concentration were evaluated in both groups on study days 7 and 14. The numbers of adverse events were also compared between the two groups. No statistically significant differences were found in the results between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Although the study had limitations, it suggested that EPO 40,000 U twice/week did not increase or sustain stimulation of the erythropoietic response compared with EPO 40,000 U/week in critically ill patients.

Erythropoiesis in multiply injured patients

Posttraumatic anemia in multiply injured patients is caused by hemorrhage, reduced red blood cell survival, and impaired erythropoiesis. Trauma-induced hyperinflammation causes impaired bone-marrow function by means of blunted erythropoietin (EPO) response, reduced iron availability, suppression and egress of erythroid progenitor cells. To treat posttraumatic anemia in severely injured patients, symptomatic therapy by blood transfusion is not sufficient. Furthermore, EPO, iron, and the use of red cell substitutes should be considered. The posttraumatic systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) induces posttraumatic anemia. Thus, a worsening of SIRS by a "second-hit" through blood transfusion ought to be avoided.

Clinical strategies in the medical care of Jehovah's Witnesses

Jehovah's Witnesses are primarily known to physicians for their refusal of blood transfusions. Conflict arises at times with the medical staff concerning how best to manage their care. This article will begin with a brief description of the beliefs of Jehovah's Witnesses and will then recommend specific clinical strategies highlighting newer potential therapies according to the principles of bloodless medicine. The scenarios of bleeding and acute and chronic anemia will be discussed in detail for the care of these patients refusing red blood cell transfusions. An update in the use of blood substitutes will be mentioned as well as the surgical advances used today that can minimize blood loss for all patients. The experience of organ transplantation in Jehovah's Witnesses will be detailed. Further resources for physicians with questions in the care of these patients will be listed. Stressed throughout the article will be the need for a team approach and good communication between physicians to successfully care for their patients who are Jehovah's Witnesses.

Diagnosis and management of iron-related anemias in critical illness

OBJECTIVE

To review of the prevalence, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of iron (Fe)-related anemias in critical illness.

DATA SOURCE

A MEDLINE/PubMed search from 1966 to October 2005 was conducted. References from relevant articles were manually cross-referenced with additional original articles, review articles, correspondence, and chapters from selected textbooks.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Both Fe metabolism and erythropoiesis are affected by the inflammatory response that accompanies critical illness. As a result, many critically ill patients develop the anemia of inflammation, which may be compounded by an underlying Fe deficiency. Most commonly available markers of total body Fe detect Fe deficiency unreliably in the setting of inflammation. Among these tests, the serum transferrin receptor assay is relatively accurate in reflecting total body Fe, regardless of inflammation. Treatment options for Fe-related anemias in critical illness include Fe replacement and recombinant human erythropoietin therapy. The decision to implement these therapies is complex and centers on a critical evaluation of ability to affect anemia, morbidity, and mortality in critical illness and on the potential risks of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Fe deficiency anemia and the anemia of inflammation may co-exist in critical illness. Diagnosis of and differentiation between these two anemias involves careful interpretation of multiple markers of total body Fe stores. The utility of treatment with both Fe and recombinant human erythropoietin for these disorders during critical illness requires further investigation.

Alternatives to blood product transfusion in the critically ill: erythropoietin

OBJECTIVE

To present information regarding the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) to treat anemia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients

MAIN RESULTS

Anemia is common in critically ill patients. Approximately 95% of patients have subnormal hemoglobin (Hb) values by day 3 of their ICU stay. ICU-associated anemia often requires replacement of red blood cells (RBCs) via transfusion. Recent surveys of ICU practice document that approximately 50% of ICU patients receive RBC transfusions. ICU-associated anemia is largely the result of the cumulative effects of blood loss and decreased RBC production. Blood loss in critically ill patients may be overt, occult, or due to phlebotomy. Decreased RBC production is the other major factor influencing the development of anemia. Decreased RBC production is due to the combined effects of abnormal iron metabolism, inappropriately low erythropoietin production, diminished response to erythropoietin, and direct suppression of RBC production. Inflammatory mediators play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of decreased RBC production. Clinical trials have shown that, compared with nontreated subjects, rHuEPO-treated ICU patients will have increased serum erythropoietin concentrations, increased reticulocyte counts, and increased hemoglobin and hematocrit values and require fewer RBC transfusions. These clinical trials have not detected significant differences in outcomes in association with rHuEPO, however.

CONCLUSIONS

rHuEPO can be used to increase hemoglobin and hematocrit values and decrease the number of RBC transfusions in ICU patients. Further investigation is necessary to identify the appropriate target population of ICU patients for treatment, to clarify the appropriate dosing schedule, and to ascertain whether such therapy has a positive impact on outcomes.

The Role of Erythropoietin Therapy in the Critically Ill

Critically ill patients receive an extraordinarily large number of blood transfusions. Between 40% and 50% of all patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) receive at least one allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) unit and average close to 5 U of RBCs during their ICU admission. RBC transfusion is not risk-free, and there is little evidence that "routine" transfusion of stored allogeneic RBCs is beneficial to critically ill patients. It is clear that most critically ill patients can tolerate hemoglobin levels as low as 7 g/dL, and therefore, a more conservative approach to RBC transfusion is warranted. Anemia of critical illness is a distinct clinical entity characterized by blunted erythropoietin (EPO) production and abnormalities in iron metabolism identical to what is commonly referred to as anemia of chronic disease. As such, the bone marrow in many of these patients responds to the administration of exogenous EPO, in spite of their underlying critical illness. The efficacy of perioperative recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has been demonstrated in a variety of elective surgical settings. Similarly, in critically ill patients, rHuEPO therapy will also stimulate erythropoiesis. In randomized placebo-controlled trials, therapy with rHuEPO resulted in a significant reduction in allogeneic RBC transfusions. Strategies to increase the production of RBCs are complementary to other approaches to reduce blood loss in the ICU and decrease the transfusion threshold in the management of all critically ill patients.

Blood conservation in the critically ill patient

This review focuses on transfusion practice in the critically ill.

Cost-effectiveness of recombinant human erythropoietin for reducing red blood cells transfusions in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cost-effectiveness of using recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) to reduce red blood cells (RBC) transfusions in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS

Decision analysis examining costs and effectiveness of using rHuEPO versus not using rHuEPO in a simulated adult medical/surgical/trauma (mixed) ICU. Two independent cost-effectiveness models were created based on the results of two multicenter studies that investigated the use of rHuEPO. Base case assumptions and estimates of effectiveness were obtained from these two studies. Mean cumulative doses of rHuEPO were 190,900 units and 102,400 units for studies 1 and 2, respectively. The models accounted for the deferral rate for allogeneic RBC transfusions, rHuEPO efficacy (the reduction in allogeneic RBC use), and adverse effects of rHuEPO and allogeneic RBC transfusions. Model estimates were obtained from published sources. Costs were expressed in 2002 US dollar (dollars) and effectiveness was measured using discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). A 3% discount rate was used. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted using second-order Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS

Incremental costs of using rHuEPO to reduce RBC transfusions amounted to 1918 dollars and 1439 dollars; incremental effectiveness values were 0.0563 QALYs and 0.0305 QALYs; and the cost-effectiveness ratios were 34,088 dollars and 47,149 dollars per QALY for studies 1 and 2, respectively. The model was most sensitive to the attributable risk of nosocomial bacterial infections per RBC unit. rHuEPO was cost-effective in 52.0% of the Monte Carlo simulations for a willingness to pay of 50,000 dollars/QALY.

CONCLUSION

rHuEPO appears to be cost-effective for reducing RBC transfusions in heterogeneous ICU populations, assuming RBC transfusions increase the risk of nosocomial bacterial infections.

Use of blood products in sepsis: An evidence-based review

OBJECTIVE

In 2003, critical care and infectious disease experts representing 11 international organizations developed management guidelines for the use of blood products in sepsis that would be of practical use for the bedside clinician, under the auspices of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, an international effort to increase awareness and to improve outcome in severe sepsis.

DESIGN

The process included a modified Delphi method, a consensus conference, several subsequent smaller meetings of subgroups and key individuals, teleconferences, and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee.

METHODS

The modified Delphi methodology used for grading recommendations built on a 2001 publication sponsored by the International Sepsis Forum. We undertook a systematic review of the literature graded along five levels to create recommendation grades from A to E, with A being the highest grade. Pediatric considerations to contrast adult and pediatric management are in the article by Parker et al. on p. S591.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of extenuating circumstances and following resolution of tissue hypoperfusion, red blood cell transfusion should be targeted to maintain hemoglobin at 7.0 g/dL or greater. Erythropoietin is not recommended as a specific treatment for sepsis-associated anemia. Fresh-frozen plasma should be given for documented deficiency of coagulation factors and in the presence of active bleeding or before surgical or invasive procedures. Antithrombin administration is not recommended. Specific platelet transfusion thresholds are based on the presence or absence of bleeding, significant risk for bleeding, plans for surgery or invasive procedures, and platelet count </=5,000/mm.

Erythropoietin for Prevention and Treatment of Anemia in the Intensive Care Unit

Objective:

To evaluate and summarize the data on erythropoietin (EPO) use to prevent anemia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Data Sources:

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1966–December 2003) using the key words erythropoietin, intensive care unit, anemia, and critically ill.

Data Synthesis:

Attempts to decrease the complications associated with anemia in ICU patients have recently focused on EPO use. Two comprehensive studies found that EPO significantly reduced the cumulative number of blood transfusions as compared to that of placebo. The assessing outcomes found no difference between the groups with respect to mortality rates, ventilation days, or length of stay.

Conclusions:

Available trials demonstrate reduced blood transfusions in ICU patients when EPO is administered. However, this result has not carried over as a defined clinical benefit. EPO use should be reserved for patients with longer hospital stays who are at risk for frequent blood transfusions as a comprehensive blood conservation strategy in the ICU.

Indications et limites de l'utilisation d'érythropoïétine recombinée en réanimation

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the data from the literature on erythropoietin and the future indications of recombinant human erythropoietin in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

DATA SOURCE

References were obtained from computerized bibliographic research (Pubmed) from 1986 to 2003, except for some physiologic data.

DATA SELECTION

Original articles, reviews, and letters to editor in French and English were selected and analyzed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

An anemia is often observed in patients hospitalized in ICU. This anemia may be due to many reasons. The management of anemia consists on the treatment of the underlying disease associated with the transfusion of red blood cells. Recent studies provided evidence of an association between transfusions and mortality in ICU patients. The anemia of ICU patients is compared to the anemia of chronic diseases, which is characterized by a blunted erythropoietin. A treatment with rHuEPO may be a future therapeutic of the anemia in such patients. A multicentric study shows the efficacy of recombinant erythropoietin therapy on a decrease in the use of red blood cell, and another clinical trial highlights a decrease of the proportion of ICU patients receiving red blood cell. Recombinant erythropoietin could be an alternative to transfusion in certain conditions and certain ICU patients. Further studies are needed to determine the consequences on mortality rate and to clarify the place of this therapy in ICU patients.

Anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill patient: role of erythropoietin

Critically ill patients receive an extraordinarily large number of blood transfusions. Between 40% and 50% of all patients admitted to intensive care units receive at least 1 red blood cell (RBC) unit during their stay, and the average is close to 5 RBC units. RBC transfusion is not risk free. There is little evidence that 'routine' transfusion of stored allogeneic RBCs is beneficial to critically ill patients. The efficacy of perioperative recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has been demonstrated in a variety of elective surgical settings. Similarly, in critically ill patients with multiple organ failure, rHuEPO therapy will also stimulate erythropoiesis. In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, therapy with rHuEPO resulted in a significant reduction in RBC transfusions. Despite receiving fewer RBC transfusions, patients in the rHuEPO group had a significantly greater increase in hematocrit. Strategies to increase the production of RBCs are complementary to other approaches to reduce blood loss in the intensive care unit, and they decrease the transfusion threshold in the management of all critically ill patients.

Pathophysiology of intensive care unit-acquired anemia

The formation of red blood cells (RBCs) in the bone marrow is regulated by erythropoietin in response to a cascade of events. Anemia in the intensive care unit can be caused by a host of factors. Patients in the intensive care unit may have decreased RBC production and a blunted response to erythropoietin. Administration of recombinant human erythropoietin may stimulate erythropoiesis, increase hematocrit levels and hemoglobin concentration, and reduce the need for RBC transfusions.

Iron supplementation in the intensive care unit: when, how much, and by what route?

Derangements of iron metabolism may be present in critically ill patients who develop anemia during a stay in the intensive care unit. Iron supplementation may be appropriate, especially if an underlying nutritional disorder is present. It may be even more critical to replace iron when erythropoietin therapy is used because of the consumption of iron stores that occurs during heme synthesis. Iron therapy is not without risks, and controversy persists regarding the potential for iron overload and infections. Clinical trials that define the optimal dose, route, and timing of iron administration in critically ill patients are lacking. However, studies of iron supplementation in chronic kidney disease, pregnancy, and anemia of prematurity may provide some guidance about approaches to treatment. Clinical evidence and limitations that can assist clinicians in managing iron therapy in the intensive care unit are presented.

Use of exogenous erythropoietin in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVE

Review the literature regarding the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) to prevent red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in critically ill patients.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search of MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1966 through June 2003 was conducted using the terms erythropoietin, anemia, hemoglobin, critical care, intensive care, surgery, trauma, burn, and transfusion. References of selected articles were reviewed. A manual search of critical care, surgery, trauma, burn, hematology, and pharmacy journals was conducted to identify relevant abstracts.

RESULTS

Six randomized studies have evaluated exogenous administration of erythropoietin to prevent RBC transfusions in critically ill patients. Studies vary with respect to rHuEPO dosage regimens, dose of concurrently administered iron, patient characteristics, and transfusion thresholds. Administration of rHuEPO rapidly produces erythropoiesis to reduce the need for RBC transfusions. The largest study conducted to date used weekly rHuEPO administration and found a modest decrease in transfusion requirements although the time to first transfusion was delayed. Reduced intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) was shown in only one study of surgical/trauma patients. Reduced LOS after ICU discharge was found in another study of severely ill patients (APACHE II score >22). Other clinical outcomes were not altered by rHuEPO use. No adverse events were associated with rHuEPO use although studies were not designed to evaluate safety.

CONCLUSIONS

rHuEPO reduces the need for transfusions. A cost-effectiveness analysis of rHuEPO for this indication is needed. Defining an optimal dosage regimen, identifying patients most likely to respond to rHuEPO, and determining risk factors for ICU associated anaemia would provide information for appropriate rHuEPO utilization.

Is there a place for epoetin alfa in managing anemia during critical illness?

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a common problem in critically ill patients. As a result, blood transfusions are often used in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. However, mounting evidence shows that blood transfusions may contribute to negative outcomes, such as transfusion-related infections, organ dysfunction, and immunosuppression. Supplementation with epoetin alfa is currently used in some medical centers to manage anemia in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the risks with blood transfusions and the clinical evidence supporting the use of epoetin alfa in managing edema during critical illness.

METHODS

A search was conducted in MEDLINE and Current Contents (1966-2003) using the terms epoetin alfa, recombinant human erythropoietin, and anemia. Articles addressing anemia and the use of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients were selected and assessed. From this selection, the cited references addressing the etiology of anemia in the ICU and the risks associated with blood transfusions were manually extracted and reviewed.

RESULTS

Several reports have shown that critically ill patients display evidence of anemia due to a blunted erythropoietin response. One large, randomized, placebo-controlled study assessed the effect of SC epoetin alfa on blood transfusions in the ICU. In this study, 40, 000 IU administered weekly for up to 4 weeks resulted in an overall transfusion reduction (9.9% absolute risk reduction; P<0.001 ). Other, smaller studies using different dosing regimens in critically ill patients have also demonstrated that epoetin alfa can decrease the need for transfusion.

CONCLUSION

The use of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients can decrease the number of blood transfusions required during hospitalization, and potentially result in transfusion avoidance. Because of the scarce amount of evidence and the diversity of dosing regimens used used, no strict recommendations can be drawn from this review.

Anemia in the critically ill

The anemia of critical illness is a distinct clinical entity with characteristics similar to that of chronic disease anemia. Several solutions to the processes of anemia, such as blunted erythropoietin production and erythropoietin response and abnormalities in iron metabolism have been developed. The transfusion of RBCs provides immediate correction of low hemoglobin levels, which may be of value in patients with life-threatening anemia. Avoidance of RBC and blood component transfusion, however, is becoming increasingly important as data of adverse clinical outcomes in critically ill patients become clearer. Although the optimal hemoglobin in critically ill patients is not determined, this organ system has a generous reserve. Short-term compensated anemia is tolerated well, while exogenous erythropoietin allows patients to achieve higher hemoglobin concentrations without exposure to transfused blood/blood components. A recent randomized trial enrolled over 1300 critically ill patients to receive either 40,000 units of exogenous erythropoietin or placebo. These authors found that patients randomized to erythropoietin received significantly less allogeneic RBC transfusions and had significantly greater increases in hemoglobin. Although no differences were found between groups in gross clinical outcomes (ie, death, renal failure, myocardial infarction), this study did not have the power to identify small differences in outcomes. This and other studies of exogenous erythropoietin therapy in critically ill patients clearly demonstrate that the bone marrow in many of these patients will respond to the administration of erythropoietin despite their illness, suggesting a blunted production of erythropoietin rather than a blunted response to erythropoietin. Exogenous erythropoietin therefore represents a therapeutic option for treating anemia in critical illness. Acute events in medicine and surgery often lead to many patients becoming anemic. Solutions to this process of anemia should be focused on preventing such events. Anemia after surgery represents an area for prevention. Blood conservation strategies can be performed with adequate results. Monk et al randomized 79 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy to preoperative autologous donation (PAD), preoperative exogenous erythropoietin therapy plus ANH immediately following induction of general anesthesia, and ANH alone. This study concluded that all three techniques resulted in similar hemostasis outcomes (eg, bleeding and transfusion rates), but ANH alone was the least expensive, and ANH plus exogenous erythropoietin and ANH alone resulted in a higher ICU hematocrit compared with PAD. Regardless of these prophylactic strategies, patients still become anemic after surgery or during critical illness. This acute event anemia usually is treated with RBC transfusion; however, autologous blood recovery (cell salvage systems) has been shown to be effective in patients with acute bleeding-related anemia, and this may reduce patients' exposure to allogeneic blood in these patients. There are no universally accepted treatment guidelines for managing anemia, and practice differs between clinicians, hospitals, regions, and countries. Transfusion medicine is evolving and incorporating many new pharmacological agents into the armamentarium of anemia and bleeding therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests that anemia in critically ill patients is common and correlated with poor outcomes. The management of anemia can improve outcomes; however, the optimal management of anemia is not performed universally. New approaches, continued research, and an understanding of anemia may result in more consistent and improved outcomes for critically ill patients.

Use of Epoetin Alfa in Critically III Patients

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the controversies regarding the use of epoetin alfa (EPO) for reducing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in critically ill patients with anemia.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966–July 2003) was conducted using the search terms anemia; critical illness; erythropoietin; epoetin alfa; and erythropoietin, recombinant. References of selected articles were reviewed for studies that may have been missed by the computerized search.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies pertaining to the use of EPO for anemia of critical illness with an emphasis on data obtained from controlled trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Anemia is a common complication in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Two prospective, randomized studies have demonstrated decreased transfusion requirements associated with EPO administration in medical/surgical patients who were in the ICU for at least 3 days and had hematocrit concentrations <38%. No differences were found in length of stay or mortality. A multicenter trial found that a restrictive strategy of RBC transfusion (hemoglobin goal 7–9 g/dL) was associated with in-hospital mortality lower than that with a more liberal approach, which calls into question the 38% hematocrit goal in the EPO trials. Furthermore, preliminary results from an economic analysis of EPO use in the ICU setting have demonstrated that EPO is not cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the controversies surrounding EPO administration in critically ill patients, institutions are encouraged to develop EPO guidelines to help ensure the most appropriate use of this expensive product. Additional studies regarding patients most likely to benefit from EPO therapy, the most effective dosing regimen, and use of adjunctive therapies are needed.

Managing Anemia in the Critically Ill Patient

Anemia of critical illness is a multifactorial condition caused by phlebotomy, ongoing blood loss, and inadequate production of red blood cells. It occurs early in the course of critical illness. Although red blood cell transfusion is the treatment of choice for immediate management of anemia in the intensive care unit, controversy surrounds the most appropriate hemoglobin concentration or hematocrit "trigger." Therapeutic options, including blood-conservation tools, minimization of phlebotomy, erythropoietic agents, and investigational oxygen-carrying agents, may be alternatives to red blood cell transfusions in critically ill patients with anemia. Patient selection for erythropoietic agents will depend on further work dealing with outcomes and the total cost of care in managing the anemia of critical illness.

Transfusion practice in the critically ill

BACKGROUND

Anemia in the critically ill patient population is common. This anemia of critical illness is a distinct clinical entity characterized by blunted erythropoietin production and abnormalities in iron metabolism identical to what is commonly referred to as the anemia of chronic disease.

FINDINGS

As a result of this anemia, critically ill patients receive an extraordinarily large number of blood transfusions. Between 40% and 50% of all patients admitted to intensive care units receive at least one red blood cell unit, and the average is close to five red blood cell units during their intensive care unit stay. There is little evidence that "routine" transfusion of stored allogeneic red blood cells is beneficial for critically ill patients. Most critically ill patients can tolerate hemoglobin levels as low as 7 mg/dL, so a more conservative approach to red blood cell transfusion is warranted.

CONCLUSION

Practice strategies should be directed toward a reduction of blood loss (phlebotomy) and a decrease in the transfusion threshold in critically ill patients.

Red blood cell physiology in critical illness

OBJECTIVE

Reduction in red blood cell mass, as well as structural and functional alterations of erythrocytes, occurs in critical illness. This review discusses these changes in red blood cell physiology, emphasizing the pathogenesis of anemia in intensive care unit patients.

DATA SOURCE

Studies published in biomedical journals.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSION

Anemia in intensive care unit patients resembles the anemia of chronic disease, being characterized by diminished erythropoietin production relative to decreased hematocrit, altered iron metabolism, and impaired proliferation and differentiation of erythroid progenitors in the bone marrow. Inflammatory mediators play a major role in the development of insufficient erythropoiesis and altered iron metabolism. Furthermore, a proinflammatory milieu promotes structural and functional alterations of erythrocytes, impairing their deformability and possibly impairing microvascular perfusion. Collectively, these changes in red blood cell physiology can impair oxygen transport to tissues and, thereby, might contribute to the development of multiple organ failure in critical illness.

The hematologic system as a marker of organ dysfunction in sepsis

Sepsis with acute organ dysfunction (severe sepsis) results from a systemic proinflammatory and procoagulant response to infection. Organ dysfunction in the patient with sepsis is associated with increased mortality. Although most organs have discrete anatomical boundaries and carry out unified functions, the hematologic system is poorly circumscribed and serves several unrelated functions. This review addresses the hematologic changes associated with sepsis and provides a framework for prompt diagnosis and rational drug therapy. Data sources used include published research and review articles in the English language related to hematologic alterations in animal models of sepsis and in critically ill patients. Hematologic changes are present in virtually every patient with severe sepsis. Leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and activation of the coagulation cascade are the most common abnormalities. Despite theoretical advantages of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to enhance leukocyte function and/or circulating numbers, large clinical trials with these growth factors are lacking. Recent studies support a reduction in the red blood cell transfusion threshold and the use of erythropoietin treatment to reduce transfusion requirements. Treatment of thrombocytopenia depends on the cause and clinical context but may include platelet transfusions and discontinuation of heparin or other inciting drugs. The use of activated protein C may provide a survival benefit in subsets of patients with severe sepsis. The hematologic system should not be overlooked when assessing a patient with severe sepsis. A thorough clinical evaluation and panel of laboratory tests that relate to this organ system should be as much a part of the work-up as taking the patient's blood pressure, monitoring renal function, or measuring liver enzymes.