The prevalence of occult carotid artery stenosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Neck dissection for head and neck malignancies with concurrent carotid endarterectomy

Head and neck malignancies share similar risk factors as carotid artery stenosis and these can often present together. Patients who require external beam radiotherapy are at a higher risk of developing significant worsening stenosis. The workup of the oncologic patient often includes computed tomography, which can reveal underlying carotid artery stenosis, offering an opportunity to address both conditions in one operation and prevent the need for a complicated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in irradiated and previously operated tissue. It was postulated that these two operations can be combined safely. The surgical protocol, surgical technique, and outcomes of a case series of four patients with head and neck cancer who underwent neck dissection and CEA for carotid artery stenosis during the same operation is presented. CEA was performed safely, simultaneously with neck dissection. CEA did not affect the surgical outcomes or postoperative course of the patients, and no minor or major complications were observed related to this procedure. Carotid endarterectomy performed by a vascular surgeon can be safely combined with oncologic neck dissection in the same procedure to avoid future complications in head and neck cancer patients.

Do traditional risk stratification models for cerebrovascular events apply in irradiated head and neck cancer patients?

BACKGROUND

Primary radical radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) often results in significant radiation dose to the carotid arteries.

AIM

We assessed whether HNC patients are at increased risk of a cerebrovascular event primarily due to RT or other risk factors for atherosclerosis by (i) risk-stratifying patients according to validated QRISK-2 and QSTROKE scores and (ii) comparing the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries.

DESIGN

HNC patients treated with an RT dose >50 Gy to one side of the neck ≥2 years previously were included.

METHODS

QRISK-2 (2014) and Q-STROKE (2014) scores were calculated. We compared the prevalence of CAS in segments of the common carotid artery on the irradiated and unirradiated sides of the neck.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (median age of 58 years (interquartile range (IQR) 50-62)) were included. The median QRISK-2 score was 10% (IQR 4.4-15%) and the median QSTROKE score was 3.4% (IQR 1.4-5.3%). For both scores, no patient was classified as high risk. Thirty-eight patients (76%) had CAS in one or both arteries. There was a significant difference in the number of irradiated arteries with stenosis (N = 37) compared with unirradiated arteries (N = 16) (P < 0.0001). There were more plaques on the irradiated artery compared with the unirradiated side - 64/87 (73.6%) versus 23/87 (26.4%), respectively (P < 0.001). 

CONCLUSIONS

Traditional vascular risk factors do not play a role in radiation-induced carotid atherosclerosis. Clinicians should be aware that traditional risk prediction models may under-estimate stroke risk in these patients.

Guidelines for Screening of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Multidisciplinary Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging; Cosponsored by the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology

The aim of this new statement is to provide comprehensive and timely evidence-based recommendations on the screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population and selected subsets of patients. Recommendations are included for high-risk persons in the general population; patients undergoing open heart surgery including coronary artery bypass surgery; patients with peripheral vascular diseases, abdominal aortic aneurysms, and renal artery stenosis; patients after radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies; patients following carotid endarterectomy, or carotid artery stent placement; patients with retinal ischemic syndromes; patients with syncope, dizziness, vertigo or tinnitus; and patients with a family history of vascular diseases and hyperhomocysteinemia. The recommendations are based on prevalence of disease, anticipated benefit, and concurrent guidelines from other professional organizations in selected populations.

Occult stenosis of the common carotid artery complicating mandibular reconstruction with a fibular free flap

An unsuspected severely stenosed common carotid artery that compromised a free flap for mandibular reconstruction is described. To our knowledge no one has advocated the assessment of the carotid tree before transfer of free tissue. We suggest that patients with several risk factors for peripheral vascular disease should have colour flow duplex imaging of the carotid system if transfer of free tissue is being considered.

A historical prospective cohort study of carotid artery stenosis after radiotherapy for head and neck malignancies

PURPOSE

To determine carotid artery stenosis incidence after radiotherapy for head-and-neck neoplasms.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This historical prospective cohort study comprised 44 head-and-neck cancer survivors who received unilateral neck radiotherapy between 1974 and 1999. They underwent bilateral carotid duplex ultrasonography to detect carotid artery stenosis.

RESULTS

The incidence of significant carotid stenosis (8 of 44 [18%]) in the irradiated neck was higher than that in the contralateral unirradiated neck (3 of 44 [7%]), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). The rate of significant carotid stenosis events increased as the time after radiotherapy increased. The risk of ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis was higher in patients who had undergone a neck dissection vs. those who had not. Patients with significant ipsilateral stenosis also tended to be older than those without significant stenosis. No other patient or treatment variables correlated with risk of carotid artery stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

For long-term survivors after neck dissection and irradiation, especially those who are symptomatic, ultrasonographic carotid artery screening should be considered.