Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa surgery for small vestibular schwannomas

Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa approach for hearing and facial nerve preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors arising from vestibular nerve's Schwann cells. Surgical resection via retrosigmoid (RS) or middle fossa (MF) is standard, but the optimal approach remains debated. This meta-analysis evaluated RS and MF approaches for VS management, emphasizing hearing preservation and Cranial nerve seven (CN VII) outcomes stratified by tumor size.

METHODS

Systematic searches across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase identified relevant studies. Hearing and CN VII outcomes were gauged using the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gardner Robertson, and House-Brackmann scores.

RESULTS

Among 7228 patients, 56 % underwent RS and 44 % MF. For intracanalicular tumors, MF recorded 38 % hearing loss, compared to RS's 54 %. In small tumors (<1.5 cm), MF showed 41 % hearing loss, contrasting RS's lower 15 %. Medium-sized tumors (1.5 cm-2.9 cm) revealed 68 % hearing loss in MF and 55 % in RS. Large tumors (>3cm) were only reported in RS with a hearing loss rate of 62 %.

CONCLUSION

Conclusively, while MF may be preferable for intracanalicular tumors, RS demonstrated superior hearing preservation for small to medium-sized tumors. This research underlines the significance of stratified outcomes by tumor size, guiding surgical decisions and enhancing patient outcomes.

Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma and Neurofibromatosis Type II

Cochlear implantation offers significantly better hearing outcomes than auditory brainstem implantation in patients with vestibular schwannoma. Neither the primary treatment modality nor the cause of the tumor (neurofibromatosis type 2 related or sporadic) seems to have a significant effect on hearing outcome with cochlear implantation. Some uncertainty remains regarding long-term hearing outcomes; however, cochlear implantation in vestibular schwannoma serves to offer patients, with a functioning cochlear nerve, the probability of open set speech discrimination with a consequent positive impact on quality of life.

Endoscopic-Assisted Keyhole Middle Cranial Fossa Approach for Small Vestibular Schwannomas

The classical middle cranial fossa approach (MCFA) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) removal often requires a large incision and craniotomy, excessive temporal lobe manipulation, and a longer recovery. We describe a keyhole MCFA (KMCFA) with endoscopic assistance that allows for adequate access with minimal temporal lobe manipulation, resulting in a fast recovery and an invisible scar. Eight sides of four cadaveric heads were dissected through the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA to access the internal auditory canal (IAC). Furthermore, five patients with intracanalicular VS underwent tumor removal with the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA. During the endoscopic-assisted KMCFA with fine instruments, a 3-cm supra-auricular incision and a 2-cm diameter keyhole craniotomy achieved exposure of the entire length of the IAC in all cadaveric dissections without unintended violation of the cochlea, semicircular canal, and facial nerve. The gross tumor was totally removed in five patients with no major postoperative complications. The surgical time was reduced, the hearing outcomes were similar to those of the classical MCFA, and the scar was invisible 1 month after the surgery. The endoscopic-assisted KMCFA permits intracanalicular VS removal in a safe, efficient, and cosmetic way. For small intracanalicular VSs, this approach can replace the classical MCFA when indicated.

Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Objective  Ipsilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in vestibular schwannoma (VS) has been an emerging trend over the last two decades. We conducted the first systematic review of hearing outcomes comparing neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) and sporadic VS undergoing CI. A comparison of the two populations and predictor of outcome was assessed. This is an update to a previously presented study. Data Sources  Systemic data searches were performed in PubMed NCBI and Scopus by an academic librarian. No restrictions based on the year of publication were used. Study Selection  Studies were selected if patients had a diagnosis of NF2 and a CI placed in the affected side with reports of hearing outcome. Two independent reviewers screened each abstract and full-text article. Data Extraction  Studies were extracted at the patient level, and the assessment of quality and bias was evaluated according to the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Main Outcome Measures  Outcome predictors were determined by using the chi-square test and Student's t -test. Results  Overall, most CI recipients functioned in the high-to-intermediate performer category for both sporadic and NF2-related VS. Median AzBio (Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test) was 72% (interquartile range [IQR]: 50) in NF2 patients and 70% (IQR: 7.25) in sporadic patients. Larger tumor size predicted a poorer final audiometric outcome. Conclusions  Categorization of hearing outcome into superior performance and inferior performance based on sentence recognition revealed a generally good hearing outcome regardless of treatment or patient population. Select patients with sporadic and NF2 VS may benefit from CI.

Clinical Studies and Pre-clinical Animal Models on Facial Nerve Preservation, Reconstruction, and Regeneration Following Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Surgery-A Systematic Review and Future Perspectives

Background and purpose: Tumorous lesions developing in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) get into close contact with the 1st (cisternal) and 2nd (meatal) intra-arachnoidal portion of the facial nerve (FN). When surgical damage occurs, commonly known reconstruction strategies are often associated with poor functional recovery. This article aims to provide a systematic overview for translational research by establishing the current evidence on available clinical studies and experimental models reporting on intracranial FN injury.

Methods: A systematic literature search of several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Medline) was performed prior to July 2020. Suitable articles were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included clinical studies were reviewed and categorized according to the pathology and surgical resection strategy, and experimental studies according to the animal. For anatomical study purposes, perfusion-fixed adult New Zealand white rabbits were used for radiological high-resolution imaging and anatomical dissection of the CPA and periotic skull base.

Results: One hundred forty four out of 166 included publications were clinical studies reporting on FN outcomes after CPA-tumor surgery in 19,136 patients. During CPA-tumor surgery, the specific vulnerability of the intracranial FN to stretching and compression more likely leads to neurapraxia or axonotmesis than neurotmesis. Severe FN palsy was reported in 7 to 15 % after vestibular schwannoma surgery, and 6% following the resection of CPA-meningioma. Twenty-two papers reported on experimental studies, out of which only 6 specifically used intracranial FN injury in a rodent (n = 4) or non-rodent model (n = 2). Rats and rabbits offer a feasible model for manipulation of the FN in the CPA, the latter was further confirmed in our study covering the radiological and anatomical analysis of perfusion fixed periotic bones.

Conclusion: The particular anatomical and physiological features of the intracranial FN warrant a distinguishment of experimental models for intracranial FN injuries. New Zealand White rabbits might be a very cost-effective and valuable option to test new experimental approaches for intracranial FN regeneration. Flexible and bioactive biomaterials, commonly used in skull base surgery, endowed with trophic and topographical functions, should address the specific needs of intracranial FN injuries.

Factors associated with cerebrospinal fluid leak after a retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine angle surgery

Background

The retrosigmoid approach represents a crucial surgical route to address different lesions in the cerebellopontine angle but cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak still remains the most frequent complication after this approach. Here, we analyzed the impact of different factors in CSF leak development after a retrosigmoid approach. Identifying risk factors related to a specific approach may help the surgeon to tailor the perioperative management and to appropriately counsel patients regarding their risk profile.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, surgical, and outcome data of 103 consecutive patients (M/F, 47/56; mean follow-up 35.6 ± 23.9 months) who underwent a retrosigmoid approach for different cerebellopontine angle pathologies and studied the impact of different factors on the occurrence of a CSF leak to univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Seventy-nine patients (76.7%) were operated for tumors growing in the cerebellopontine angle. Twenty-four patients (23.2%) underwent microvascular decompression to treat a drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia. Sixteen patients (15.5%) developed CSF leak in the postoperative course of which six underwent surgical revision. Performing a craniectomy as surgical procedure (P = 0.0450) and performing a reopening procedure (second surgery; P = 0.0079) were significantly associated to a higher risk of developing CSF leak. Moreover, performing a reopening procedure emerged as an independent factor for CSF developing on multivariate analysis (P = 0.0156).

Conclusion

Patients submitted to craniectomy and patients who underwent a second surgery showed an higher CSF leak rate. Ongoing improvement of biomaterial technology may help neurosurgeons to prevent this potentially life-threatening complication.

Intracanalicular Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Therapeutics Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the current evidence on the management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma.

DATA SOURCES

Embase (1947-), Medline (1946-), Cochrane library (1947-), Scopus (2010-), and CINAHL (1961-) were searched from 1969 to October 5, 2019 (50 years).

STUDY SELECTION

A search strategy was performed to identify patients with vestibular schwannoma confined to the internal auditory canal without extension to the cerebellopontine angle. Studies with patients aged less than 18, Neurofibromatosis type 2, revision cases, and non-English language were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

A standardized collection sheet was used for the extracted data and a quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale with the comparability criterion omitted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seventy-one studies were included with 24 on observation, 14 on radiotherapy, and 34 on surgery. The primary outcome was serviceable hearing preservation. Secondary outcomes were preservation of facial nerve function, growth, involution, and dizziness. Sub-analysis on the type of surgery and type of radiotherapy were performed. Excel 2016 with MIX 2.0 Pro add-on package was used to analyze the data and create forest plots. Data were presented in proportion with a 95% confidence interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Serviceable hearing was observed in 31% of patients after observation, 56% after radiotherapy, and 51% after surgical treatment with mean follow-up time of 4.04 years, 4.92 years, and 2.23 years, respectively. Facial nerve function was found to be best preserved in both observation and radiotherapy groups. Vestibular schwannoma growth occurred in 33% of patients under observation. Involution occurred in 2% of patients under observation and in 38% after radiotherapy.

EANO guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of vestibular schwannoma

The level of evidence to provide treatment recommendations for vestibular schwannoma is low compared with other intracranial neoplasms. Therefore, the vestibular schwannoma task force of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology assessed the data available in the literature and composed a set of recommendations for health care professionals. The radiological diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma is made by magnetic resonance imaging. Histological verification of the diagnosis is not always required. Current treatment options include observation, surgical resection, fractionated radiotherapy, and radiosurgery. The choice of treatment depends on clinical presentation, tumor size, and expertise of the treating center. In small tumors, observation has to be weighed against radiosurgery, in large tumors surgical decompression is mandatory, potentially followed by fractionated radiotherapy or radiosurgery. Except for bevacizumab in neurofibromatosis type 2, there is no role for pharmacotherapy.

Prognostic Factors of Long-Term Hearing Preservation in Small and Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannomas After Microsurgery

OBJECTIVE

The authors evaluated the long-term hearing outcomes of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) to explore appropriate surgical treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 138 patients diagnosed with small and medium-sized VS with serviceable hearing from January 2006 to December 2015.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent microsurgery via retrosigmoid (RSA) or middle cranial fossa approach (MFA) and were followed up for over 2 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pre- and postoperative hearing, including pure tone audiometry, speech discrimination score, and auditory brainstem response (ABR), were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean tumor size and volume were 16.6 ± 3.4 mm and 1711.8 ± 918.5 mm, respectively. Preoperative hearing levels were Class A in 42, Class B in 67, and Class C in 29 patients. Patients with a tumor from the superior vestibular nerve (SVN) had better hearing at diagnosis. Postoperative hearing levels were Class A, B, C, and D for 28, 17, 32, and 61 patients. Hearing outcomes were significantly better in patients with normal intraoperative I wave on ABR. Hearing loss within 6 months had a positive effect on postoperative hearing. Better preoperative hearing and tumors from SVN were correlated with better postoperative hearing outcomes. Tumor size, cystic variation, or extension to the fundus of internal auditory canal had no influence on hearing preservation.

CONCLUSIONS

Better preoperative hearing, shorter hearing loss period, tumors from SVN, and normal intraoperative I wave are prognostic factors for serviceable hearing. RSA and MFA are effective and safe for tumor removal and hearing preservation.

Long-Term Hearing Preservation Outcomes for Small Vestibular Schwannomas: Retrosigmoid Removal Versus Observation

OBJECTIVE

Management of small vestibular schwannomas (VSs) consists of three options: serial observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery. The authors reported the long-term hearing outcomes after retrosigmoid tumor removal in 110 patients and hearing follow-up outcomes in 160 serial observation patients with small VSs to explore the appropriate management strategy and predictive factors of hearing preservation for small VSs.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

In this study, 110 patients with small VS (purely intracanalicular/cerebellopontine angle tumor ≤15 mm) during a 15-year period, from January 2001 to December 2015, were candidates for hearing preservation surgery through retrosigmoid approach, while 160 patients were candidates for serial observation. The main outcome measure was preservation of hearing under different hearing levels, assessed with the classification of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

RESULTS

Preoperative hearing levels of the 110 study patients were Class A in 49 patients, Class B in 43 patients, and Class C in 18 patients. In all surgery patients (n = 110), 97.3% (107/110) patients maintained the same level during postoperative follow-up (mean follow-up time was 49.1 ± 28.2 mo) and 86 (78.2%) had complete radiologic and audiometric data at least 4 years follow-up for review. In the 4 years follow-up surgery group (n = 86), postoperative hearing levels were Class A, B, C, and D for 22, 11, 18, and 35 patients, and postoperative rates of preservation of serviceable and useful hearing were 59.3% (51/86) and 47.1% (33/70), respectively. In serial observation group, mean follow-up time was 35.2 ± 33.1 months; mean tumor size at presentation was 8.6 ± 4.3 mm; overall mean tumor growth rate was 1.08 ± 2.3 mm/yr; serviceable hearing preservation rate of 98 patients was 54.1% (53/98) at the 5-year end point and 48.7% (37/76) at the 7-year end point.

CONCLUSION

Tumor removal should be the first treatment option for patients with small VSs and preserved hearing, especially for young patients with good hearing; retrosigmoid approach is an effective and safe approach for small VSs removal with excellent functional outcomes; better preoperative hearing predicted a higher rate of postoperative hearing preservation; patients without fundal extension were more likely to achieve hearing preservation than those with fundal extension, but no difference had been detected when retrosigmoid removal assisted with endoscope was performed; patients with small tumors originating from SVN were more likely to achieve hearing preservation compared with those with IVN-originating tumors.

Middle Fossa Approach for Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Decade of Experience

BACKGROUND

The middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach is a challenging surgical technique for the resection of small and intermediate sized, primarily intracanalicular, vestibular schwannomas (VS), with the goal of hearing preservation (HP).

OBJECTIVE

To describe a decade-long, single institutional experience with the MCF approach for resection of VS.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 63 patients who underwent the MCF approach for resection of VS from 2006 to 2016. Audiometric data included pure-tone average (PTA), low-tone pure-tone average (LtPTA), word recognition score, and American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) hearing classification at presentation and follow-up. Patients with postoperative serviceable (AAO-HNS class A-B) and/or useful (AAO-HNS class A-C) hearing were compared to those without HP. Facial nerve function was assessed using the House–Brackmann scale.

RESULTS

The mean age and duration of follow-up were 50 ± 13 yr and 21 ± 21 mo, respectively. The mean tumor size was 10 ± 4 mm. The serviceable and usable HP rates were 54% and 50%, respectively. Some residual hearing was preserved in 71% of patients. Large tumor size (P = .05), volume (P = .03), and extrameatal tumor extension (P = .03) were associated with poor audiometric outcomes. The presence of a fundal fluid cap (P = .01) was a favorable finding. At definitive testing, LtPTA was significantly better preserved than traditional PTA (P = .01). Facial nerve outcomes, tumor control rates, and durability of audiometric outcomes were excellent. 47% of patients pursued aural rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

In our series, the MCF approach for VS provided excellent rates of tumor and facial nerve function, with durable serviceable HP.

Surgical treatment of sporadic vestibular schwannoma in a series of 1006 patients

The management of sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) has evolved in the last decades. The aim of this study was to analyse the evolution in surgical outcomes of VSs operated by a neurotological team between 1990 and 2006 by different approaches. A monocentric retrospective review of medical charts of 1006 patients was performed. In order to assess eventual changes and progress, the 17-years period was divided in three periods, each one comprehending 268 VS (1990-1996), 299 VS (1997-2001), and 439 VS (2002-2006). Mean follow-up was 5.9 ± 2.4 years. Overall, complete VS removal was achieved in 99.4% of cases. Mortality rate was 0.3%, meningitis and CSF leaks were observed in 1.2 % and 9 % of the cases, respectively. CSF leakage decreased from 11.6% to 7.1% between the first and last period (p < 0.01) as well as revision surgery from 3.4 % to 0.9 % (p < 0.05). Facial nerve was anatomically preserved in 97.7% of cases. At one year, a good facial nerve function was observed in 85.1% of patients (grade I and II of House-Brackmann grading scale), which ranged between the first and last period from 78.4% to 87.6% (p <0.05). At one year, hearing preservation was obtained in 61.6% of patients, which increased from the first period to the last one from 50.9% to 69.0% (p < 0.05) (class A+B+C from the AAO-HNS classification). Useful hearing (class A+B) was observed in 33.5% of cases overall, with 21.8% and 42% in the first and last period, respectively (p < 0.01). Surgical outcomes of sporadic vestibular schwannoma have improved concerning facial nerve function outcomes, hearing preservation and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, mainly due to the neuro-otological team's experience. Functional results after complete microsurgical removal of large VS depend on experience gained on small VS removal.

Exposing the Fundus of the Internal Acoustic Meatus without Entering the Labyrinth Using a Retrosigmoid Approach: Is It Possible?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the feasibility of performing a labyrinth-sparing neuronavigation-assisted retrosigmoid approach to the fundus of the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and to describe the anatomy of the structures embedded in the posterior meatal wall.

METHODS

Ten surgical dissections were performed bilaterally on 5 fresh cadavers. Cadavers were subjected to preoperative computed tomography scans and spatial coordinates of inner ear structures were recorded. A retrosigmoid craniectomy was performed. The IAM was drilled towards the fundus until no more than 1 mm of bone covered the labyrinthine structures. Specimens underwent a new computed tomography scan to verify the length of opened IAM and the status of the labyrinth. We then opened the labyrinthine structures and recorded their coordinates using navigation. These were compared with the radiologic coordinates to verify the neuronavigation accuracy.

RESULTS

In 9 sides, the IAM was opened to the fundus without injuring the labyrinth; in 1 side, the vestibule was opened. The mean residual bone on the fundus was 0.97 mm. The average length of the accessible IAM was 88.95%. The best accuracy of the navigation was for the identification of the common crus, with a mean value of 0.73 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

This surgical technique could facilitate the opening of the IAM with preservation of inner ear structures. We opened a mean of 88.95% of the IAM without entering the labyrinthine structures in 90% of cases. These results confirm the feasibility of the retrosigmoid approach for the exposure of the IAM fundus with preservation of labyrinthine structures.

Decision making in dissection range of temporal bone: refinements to enlarged translabyrinthine approach

The aim of the study was to describe the refinements to the classic enlarged translabyrinthine approach (ETLA) by modifying the bony dissection range of temporal bone and to analyze the main outcomes achieved in a series of vestibular schwannoma (VS) cases submitted to microsurgery by ETLA. This was a retrospective study of 382 patients who underwent VS surgical removal via ETLA between January 2001 and December 2012. Among those cases, 332 were via classic ETLA, while 28 cases were via ETLA with blind sac technique and middle ear eradication and 22 via transotic approach. Total tumor removal was achieved in 368 cases, whereas near total removal in 11 patients and subtotal in 3 patients. In cases of large VS (>3 cm) via classic ETLA, good short-term and long-term facial nerve function (HB I-II) was gained in 27.8 % (32/115) and 42.6 % (49/115) cases, respectively, meanwhile in VS operated via blind sac technique, good short-term (p = 0.048) and long-term (p = 0.044) facial nerve function was reached in 44.0 % (22/50) and 60.0 % (30/50) cases, respectively. Postoperative facial nerve function was proved to be better in modified ETLA group. CSF leakage occurred in 16 (4.2 %) patients via classic ETLA. In 115 cases of large VS (>3 cm), postoperative CSF leakage occurred in 10 (8.7 %) patients. Whereas in 50 cases via blind sac technique, none developed CSF leakage (p = 0.03). The incidence of CSF leakage was lower in modified ETLA group. Our refinements to classic ETLA by changing the temporal bone resection range provide a wide surgical field, well prevention of CSF leakage and preservation of facial nerve function in large VS.

Reconstruction after retrosigmoid approaches using autologous fat graft-assisted Medpor Titan cranioplasty: assessment of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks and headaches in 60 cases

BACKGROUND

Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks and headaches remain potential complications after retrosigmoid approaches for lesions in the posterior fossa and cerebellopontine angle. The authors describe a simple repair technique with an autologous fat graft-assisted Medpor Titan cranioplasty and investigate the incidence of postoperative CSF leaks and headaches using this technique.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on all cases (n = 60) of retrosigmoid craniectomy from September 2009 to May 2014 in patients who underwent fat graft-assisted cranioplasty. After obtaining a watertight dural closure and sealing off any visible mastoid air cells with bone wax, an autologous fat graft was placed over the dural suture line and up against the waxed-off air cells. The fat graft filled the retrosigmoid cranial defect and was then bolstered with a Medpor Titan (titanium mesh embedded in porous polyethylene) cranioplasty. A postoperative mastoid pressure dressing was applied for 48 h, and prophylactic lumbar drainage was not used. Factors examined in this study included postoperative CSF leak (incisional, rhinorrhea, otorrhea), pseudomeningocele formation, incidence and severity of postoperative headache, length of hospital stay, and length of follow-up.

RESULTS

No patients developed postoperative CSF leaks (0 %), pseudomeningoceles (0 %), or new-onset postoperative headaches (0 %) with the described repair technique. There were no cases of graft site morbidity such as hematoma or wound infection. Mean duration of postoperative hospital stay was 3.8 days (range 2-10 days). Mean postoperative follow-up was 12.4 months (range 2.0-41.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our multilayer repair technique with a fat graft-assisted Medpor Titan cranioplasty appears effective in preventing postoperative CSF leaks and new-onset postoperative headaches after retrosigmoid approaches. Postoperative lumbar drainage may not be necessary.

Retrosigmoid removal of small acoustic neuroma: curative tumor removal with preservation of function

Object

Management of small acoustic neuromas (ANs) consists of 3 options: observation with imaging follow-up, radiosurgery, and/or tumor removal. The authors report the long-term outcomes and preservation of function after retrosigmoid tumor removal in 44 patients and clarify the management paradigm for small ANs.

Methods

A total of 44 consecutively enrolled patients with small ANs and preserved hearing underwent retrosigmoid tumor removal in an attempt to preserve hearing and facial function by use of intraoperative auditory monitoring of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and cochlear nerve compound action potentials (CNAPs). All patients were younger than 70 years of age, had a small AN (purely intracanalicular/cerebellopontine angle tumor ≤ 15 mm), and had serviceable hearing preoperatively. According to the guidelines of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, preoperative hearing levels of the 44 patients were as follows: Class A, 19 patients; Class B, 17; and Class C, 8. The surgical technique for curative tumor removal with preservation of hearing and facial function included sharp dissection and debulking of the tumor, reconstruction of the internal auditory canal, and wide removal of internal auditory canal dura.

Results

For all patients, tumors were totally removed without incidence of facial palsy, death, or other complications. Total tumor removal was confirmed by the first postoperative Gd-enhanced MRI performed 12 months after surgery. Postoperative hearing levels were Class A, 5 patients; Class B, 21; Class C, 11; and Class D, 7. Postoperatively, serviceable (Class A, B, or C) and useful (Class A or B) levels of hearing were preserved for 84% and 72% of patients, respectively. Better preoperative hearing resulted in higher rates of postoperative hearing preservation (p = 0.01); preservation rates were 95% among patients with preoperative Class A hearing, 88% among Class B, and 50% among Class C. Reliable monitoring was more frequently provided by CNAPs than by ABRs (66% vs 32%, p < 0.01), and consistently reliable auditory monitoring was significantly associated with better rates of preservation of useful hearing. Long-term follow-up by MRI with Gd administration (81 ± 43 months [range 5–181 months]; median 7 years) showed no tumor recurrence, and although the preserved hearing declined minimally over the long-term postoperative follow-up period (from 39 ± 15 dB to 45 ± 11 dB in 5.1 ± 3.1 years), 80% of useful hearing and 100% of serviceable hearing remained at the same level.

Conclusions

As a result of a surgical technique that involved sharp dissection and internal auditory canal reconstruction with intraoperative auditory monitoring, retrosigmoid removal of small ANs can lead to successful curative tumor removal without long-term recurrence and with excellent functional outcome. Thus, the authors suggest that tumor removal should be the first-line management strategy for younger patients with small ANs and preserved hearing.

Real time parallel intraoperative integration of endoscopic, microscopic, and navigation images: a proof of concept based on laboratory dissections

Endoscope, microscope, and neuronavigation systems are integrated in neurosurgical procedures mainly by using a serial combination algorithm, where, the user must switch his/her field of view from one platform display to another. The integration of theses devices could be optimized by incorporating different displays into one viewing platform thus achieving a parallel combination. In this study, we investigated the feasibility and the applicability of parallel integration of microscopic, endoscopic, and neuronavigation images by real time displaying the endoscope and neuronavigation image datasets in the main operative microscope oculars. The proposed set-up was effective in displaying the three images dataset in an operationally actionable mode. Ergonomically, the ability of using the different image dataset without the need of taking the eyes off the microscope oculars did not disrupt the flow or the tempo of the operative procedure. However, new endoscopes specific to this application are recommended.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques in the surgical management of acoustic neuromas

Unfavorable outcomes such as facial paralysis and deafness were once unfortunate probable complications following resection of acoustic neuromas. However, the implementation of intraoperative neuromonitoring during acoustic neuroma surgery has demonstrated placing more emphasis on quality of life and preserving neurological function. A modern review demonstrates a great degree of recent success in this regard. In facial nerve monitoring, the use of modern electromyography along with improvements in microneurosurgery has significantly improved preservation. Recent studies have evaluated the use of video monitoring as an adjunctive tool to further improve outcomes for patients undergoing surgery. Vestibulocochlear nerve monitoring has also been extensively studied, with the most popular techniques including brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring, electrocochleography, and direct compound nerve action potential monitoring. Among them, direct recording remains the most promising and preferred monitoring method for functional acoustic preservation. However, when compared with postoperative facial nerve function, the hearing preservation is only maintained at a lower rate. Here, the authors analyze the major intraoperative neuromonitoring techniques available for acoustic neuroma resection.

Current strategies in management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current practitioner is more often managing intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas than in the past, as improved imaging and heightened awareness leads to earlier diagnosis of these tumors. The role of observation, microsurgery, and radiation treatment in the management of intracanalicular tumors continues to evolve. The goal of this article is to evaluate and summarize recent literature pertaining to the management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Watchful waiting is an important management option for patients with minimal symptoms. The literature on the natural history of small vestibular schwannomas continues to expand, with particular emphasis on the expected hearing outcomes. Microsurgical techniques also focus on hearing preservation. Presence of fundal fluid and good or normal hearing preoperatively are positive predictors of hearing preservation after surgery. Long-term follow-up after radiation therapy for vestibular schwannomas continues to demonstrate excellent tumor control rates, although hearing preservation rates are modest.

SUMMARY

Multiple factors, including status of hearing, presence of vestibular symptoms, patient age, medical comorbidities, institutional outcomes, and patient preferences, help determine the management strategy for patients with an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma.

Surgery for vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review of complications by approach

Object

Various studies report outcomes of vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery, but few studies have compared outcomes across the various approaches. The authors conducted a systematic review of the available data on VS surgery, comparing the different approaches and their associated complications.

Methods

MEDLINE searches were conducted to collect studies that reported information on patients undergoing VS surgery. The authors set inclusion criteria for such studies, including the availability of follow-up data for at least 3 months, inclusion of preoperative and postoperative audiometric data, intraoperative monitoring, and reporting of results using established and standardized metrics. Data were collected on hearing loss, facial nerve dysfunction, persistent postoperative headache, CSF leak, operative mortality, residual tumor, tumor recurrence, cranial nerve (CN) dysfunction involving nerves other than CN VII or VIII, and other neurological complications. The authors reviewed data from 35 studies pertaining to 5064 patients who had undergone VS surgery.

Results

The analyses for hearing loss and facial nerve dysfunction were stratified into the following tumor categories: intracanalicular (IC), size (extrameatal diameter) < 1.5 cm, size 1.5–3.0 cm, and size > 3.0 cm. The middle cranial fossa approach was found to be superior to the retrosigmoid approach for hearing preservation in patients with tumors < 1.5 cm (hearing loss in 43.6% vs 64.3%, p < 0.001). All other size categories showed no significant difference between middle cranial fossa and retrosigmoid approaches with respect to hearing loss. The retrosigmoid approach was associated with significantly less facial nerve dysfunction in patients with IC tumors than the middle cranial fossa method was; however, neither differed significantly from the translabyrinthine corridor (4%, 16.7%, 0%, respectively, p < 0.001). The middle cranial fossa approach differed significantly from the translabyrinthine approach for patients with tumors < 1.5 cm, whereas neither differed from the retrosigmoid approach (3.3%, 11.5%, and 7.2%, respectively, p = 0.001). The retrosigmoid approach involved less facial nerve dysfunction than the middle cranial fossa or translabyrinthine approaches for tumors 1.5–3.0 cm (6.1%, 17.3%, and 15.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). The retrosigmoid approach was also superior to the translabyrinthine approach for tumors > 3.0 cm (30.2% vs 42.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). Postoperative headache was significantly more likely after the retrosigmoid approach than after the translabyrinthine approach, but neither differed significantly from the middle cranial fossa approach (17.3%, 0%, and 8%, respectively; p < 0.001). The incidence of CSF leak was significantly greater after the retrosigmoid approach than after either the middle cranial fossa or translabyrinthine approaches (10.3%, 5.3%, 7.1%; p = 0.001). The incidences of residual tumor, mortality, major non-CN complications, residual tumor, tumor recurrence, and dysfunction of other cranial nerves were not significantly different across the approaches.

Conclusions

The middle cranial fossa approach seems safest for hearing preservation in patients with smaller tumors. Based on the data, the retrosigmoid approach seems to be the most versatile corridor for facial nerve preservation for most tumor sizes, but it is associated with a higher risk of postoperative pain and CSF fistula. The translabyrinthine approach is associated with complete hearing loss but may be useful for patients with large tumors and poor preoperative hearing.

Analysis of hearing preservation and facial nerve function for patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery: the middle cranial fossa approach versus the retrosigmoid approach--personal experience and literature review

OBJECTIVE

To compare hearing preservation and facial nerve function outcomes in patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery performed using either the middle cranial fossa approach (MCFA) or the retrosigmoid approach (RSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of the medical records of patients diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma who underwent surgical tumor removal in a single reference center via the MCFA or the RSA between January 1988 and December 2008 was conducted.

RESULTS

During this period, 90 patients underwent surgery via the MCFA while 86 patients received surgical treatment via the RSA. Of the patients subjected to the MCFA, 80.7% were characterized by a House-Brackmann (HB) grade I or II outcome, whereas 96.5% of patients undergoing the RSA were characterized by a HB grade I or II outcome (p = 0.001). This difference appeared only for extrameatal tumors when we compared size-matched tumors (58.3% MCFA vs. 98% RSA; p = 0.0006). There was no statistically significant difference in the hearing outcomes upon consideration of hearing preservation as characterized by the modified Sanna classification system involving classes A and B (18.9% MCFA vs. 10.6% RSA; p = 0.122).

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant difference in hearing preservation was identified when comparing tumors operated upon via the MCFA versus the RSA. However, our results indicate that a higher risk of facial nerve function impairment exists if the surgery is performed via the MCFA under circumstances where the tumor extends to the cerebellopontine angle.

The keyhole retrosigmoid approach to the cerebello-pontine angle: indications, technical modifications, and results

OBJECTIVES

Establish the versatility and usefulness of the keyhole retrosigmoid approach to the cerebello-pontine angle (CPA) in various pathologies.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral university hospital.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-one patients with various pathologies of the CPA underwent the relevant investigations and were operated upon by the retrosigmoid microendoscopic approach. The technical modifications and progression of our technique are described.

RESULTS

This group consisted of 121 patients (103 men and 28 women). The pathologies included were 60 acoustic neuromas, 28 vestibular neurectomies, nine meningiomas, and four arachnoid cysts. For nonmass lesions, no additional facial nerve injury or deterioration of hearing occurred. Total excision of mass lesions was achieved in 94.5% of cases. Facial nerve integrity was preserved in 92.3% of cases with mass lesions and permanent facial paralysis occurred in 8.3%. There were no mortalities, and the most frequent complication was a delayed cerebrospinal fluid leak from the site of the wound (15%), which was managed conservatively in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The keyhole retrosigmoid approach is a versatile one. It can be used to deal with different pathologies through a unified access, and with the increasing exclusive use of endoscopes, a truly minimally invasive surgery can be achieved.

What is the best tumor size to achieve optimal functional results in vestibular schwannoma surgery?

OBJECTIVES

To analyze our own functional results to delineate a critical vestibular schwannoma size for middle cranial fossa (MCF) surgery with the best possible outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Tumors were divided into intracanalicular, tumors 1 to 5, 6 to 10, and 11 to 15 mm in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA). Patients were evaluated at 2 months, 1 year, and 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

At 1 year, House-Brackmann score of I or II was obtained in 100% of intracanalicular and in 96%, 86%, and 85% with tumors up to 5, 10, and 15 mm in the CPA, respectively. Class I hearing was postoperatively preserved in 61%, 41%, 29%, and 20%, and measurable word recognition in 67%, 51%, 35%, and 21% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The outcome is predominantly a function of tumor size, and these changes influence MCF surgery at an earlier stage than in the translabyrinthine or retrosigmoid approach. For the facial nerve, there is a cutoff at 5-mm extracanalicular extension. Also, chances for successful hearing preservation decrease rapidly with size, and in tumors beyond 1.5 cm are below 20%. Consequently, although an expectant policy with small tumors may be reasonable in some instances, it is not so for MCF candidates.

Facial nerve function and hearing preservation acoustic tumor surgery: does the approach matter?

OBJECTIVE

The retrosigmoid and middle fossa approaches to acoustic tumor excision allow for hearing preservation but differ in the angle of approach to the facial nerve. The authors comparatively examined facial nerve results of each approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with chart review.

SETTING

Multiple physician subspecialty practice.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The authors reviewed facial nerve outcomes of patients undergoing acoustic tumor excision at a single subspecialty practice that had used a hearing preservation approach for the past 15 years. The retrosigmoid and middle fossa approaches were compared. Hearing results and recurrence rates were also examined.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight patients had adequate data for inclusion in this study. Of the patients undergoing a middle fossa approach, 80 percent had a House-Brackmann (HB) grade I-II outcome, whereas 90 percent of patients undergoing the retrosigmoid approach had an HB grade I-II. When classifying HB I and II outcomes together, we did not find a statistically different result between the surgical groups. Upon more critical analysis, however, facial function recovered faster and there were more long-term HB grade I function results in the retrosigmoid group. There were more recurrent/residual tumors in the retrosigmoid group and better hearing preservation in the middle fossa group.

CONCLUSION

There are small but important functional outcome differences between the retrosigmoid and middle fossa approach for acoustic tumors. The clinician needs a working understanding of these differences so that the correct approach can be used to produce the best results for each patient.

Diagnosis and therapy of vestibular schwannoma

MRI studies are of paramount importance for diagnosis and follow-up measurements during conservative and postinterventional management of vestibular schwannomas (VS). MRI findings that convey important information for hearing-preservation VS surgery are: length of tumor-cochlear nerve contact, involvement of the internal auditory canal, incomplete filling of internal auditory canal, tumor size less than 15 mm and the intralabyrinthine signal intensity on 3DFT-CISS gradient-echo images. Functional neuro-otologic studies of facial nerve function, hearing and vestibular/balance function provide a valuable means of assessment of the actual impairment of the functional status of the VS patient. Intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve function and hearing has been refined, resulting in improved final postoperative facial nerve and hearing outcomes in VS patients treated with microsurgery. Long-term results reported by teams practicing stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy have been very encouraging. On the other hand, conservative management appears to be a viable option for a select group of VS patients. The refinement of surgical technique has rendered surgery safer and less invasive, resulting in better functional outcomes. Steroid use is currently used postinterventionally to improve final hearing outcome, although with questionable effectiveness. Physical rehabilitation programs are applied to accelerate vestibular functional recovery postoperatively and there is weak evidence that early physical rehabilitation may improve the final facial nerve outcome. Quality-of-life measures have emerged as important determinants of final therapeutic decision-making. More studies with high levels of evidence are needed to support clinical decisions.

Hearing preservation and facial nerve function after microsurgery for intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas: comparison of middle fossa and retrosigmoid approaches

PURPOSE

Therapeutic options for vestibular schwannomas (VS) include microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery and conservative management. Early treatment of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas (IVS) may be advisable because their spontaneous course will show hearing loss in most cases. Advanced microsurgical techniques and continuous intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerves may allow hearing preservation (HP) without facial nerve damage. However, there are still controversies about the definition of hearing preservation, and the best surgical approach that should be used.

METHODS

In this study, we reviewed the main data from the recent literature on IVS surgery and compared hearing, facial function and complication rates after the retrosigmoid (RS) and middle fossa (MF) approaches, respectively.

RESULTS

The results showed that the average HP rate after IVS surgery ranged from 58% (RS) to 62% (MF). HP varied widely depending on the audiometric criteria that were used for definition of serviceable hearing. There was a trend to show that the MF approach offered a better quality of postoperative hearing (not statistically significant), whereas the RS approach offered a better facial nerve preservation and fewer complications (not statistically significant).

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that the timing of treatment in the course of the disease and selection between radiosurgical versus microsurgical procedure are key issues in the management of IVS. Preservation of hearing and good facial nerve function in surgery for VS is a reasonable goal for many patients with intracanalicular tumors and serviceable hearing. Once open surgery has been decided, selection of the approach mainly depends on individual anatomical considerations and experience of the surgeon.

HEARING PRESERVATION AFTER INTRACANALICULAR VESTIBULAR SCHWANNOMA RADIOSURGERY

OBJECTIVE

Tumor control, facial function preservation, and hearing preservation are important criteria for successful management of intracanalicular vestibular schwannomas, whether observation, microsurgery, or radiosurgery is chosen. We collected data prospectively to assess hearing preservation after intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 2003, 96 patients (65 men and 31 women) underwent gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracanalicular tumors. The median patient age was 54 years (range, 22–80 years). Hearing was graded using the Gardner-Robertson (GR) and the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery classifications. Dose planning was performed on intraoperative stereotactic images using multiple 4-mm isocenters. The median tumor volume was 0.112 mm3 (range, 0.05–0.447 mm3), and the median margin dose was 13 Gy (range, 10–18 Gy).

RESULTS

The mean and median audiologic follow-up periods were 42 months and 28 months (range, 12–144 months), respectively. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 31 of 40 (77.5%) patients with initial American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Class A hearing. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 40 of 79 (64.5%) patients with GR Grade I or II pre-SRS hearing. Ninety-two patients had GR Grade I, II, or III hearing before SRS, and GR Grade I, II, or III hearing was maintained in 78 patients (85%). Hearing grades improved in 7 patients. Facial and trigeminal nerve function was preserved in all patients. The tumor control rate (freedom from additional intervention) was 99.0% (95 of 96) at a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 12–144 months). One patient underwent tumor resection 18 months after radiosurgery.

CONCLUSION

SRS is a minimally invasive first-line management option for patients with intracanalicular tumors and provides high rates of hearing preservation with minimal morbidity.

An Anatomic and Radiologic Evaluation of Access to the Lateral Internal Auditory Canal Via the Retrosigmoid Approach and Description of an Internal Labyrinthectomy

OBJECTIVE

The retrosigmoid approach to the posterior petrous bone may be used as a hearing preservation operation for extirpation of posterior fossa and internal auditory canal (IAC) lesions. However, it is usually not possible to remove tumor from the most lateral portions of the IAC even after removing the retrolabyrinthine bone down to the posterior semicircular canal. Our goal was to examine the advantages and disadvantages of the retrosigmoid approach with respect to approaching the lateral IAC, to find what is gained by drilling down the retrolabyrinthine bone, and to describe an internal labyrinthectomy whereby the labyrinth is removed via a retrosigmoid approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a 3.5-cm craniotomy, a retrosigmoid approach was performed on one side in each of five whole fresh cadaveric heads. The IAC was identified, and the length of the IAC and the depth of the acoustic porus from the center of the craniotomy were measured. The bone posterior to the labyrinth was removed, and the length of the portion of the IAC still inaccessible was measured. These measurements were compared with measurements using computed tomography (CT) scans of each cadaveric head. Additionally, we present the findings of 11 patients who had an internal labyrinthectomy performed by the senior author.

RESULTS

The average length of the IAC based on CT scanning was 11.2 mm (SD, 0.84 mm; range, 10-12 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.44-12.96). The potential gain predicted by the CT scans was 8.4 mm (SD, 0.9 mm; range, 7-9 mm). In the anatomic study, the average length of the IAC was 11.0 mm (SD, 2.3 mm; range, 8.0-13.0 mm; 95% CI, 9.26-12.78). The average length of the IAC that was inaccessible after removing the retrolabyrinthine bone was 6.7 mm (SD, 1.5 mm; range, 5.0-7.8 mm), or 61%. The average gain in access to the lateral IAC was 4.3 mm (SD, 1.0 mm; range, 2.7-5.2 mm). After performing an internal labyrinthectomy, the fundus was accessible, as was the labyrinthine segment of Cranial Nerve VII and the geniculate ganglion.

CONCLUSION

The retrosigmoid approach provides access to the posterior petrous bone, and removal of the bone posterior to the labyrinth provides some additional access to the lateral IAC. However, an internal labyrinthectomy is necessary to provide access to the fundus of the IAC via the retrosigmoid approach.

Endolymphatic Duct Status During Middle Fossa Dissection of the Internal Auditory Canal: A Human Temporal Bone Radiographic Study

OBJECTIVE

Successful hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma resection is sometimes complicated by delayed hearing deterioration. The middle fossa approach appears to offer superior long-term hearing results when compared to the retrosigmoid surgical approach. The goal of this study is to investigate the hypothesis that internal auditory canal (IAC) drilling during middle fossa acoustic neuroma removal is associated with a lower incidence of endolymphatic duct (ELD) injury, a potential cause of delayed hearing loss (HL) known to accompany retrosigmoid hearing preservation dissection techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

A human temporal bone anatomic and radiographic study complemented with a literature review.

METHODS

Twenty human temporal bones were analyzed with high-resolution multislice computed tomography (HRMCT) and subjected to standard extended middle fossa IAC dissection with labyrinthine preservation and follow-up HRMCT for analyses of the ELD.

RESULTS

Zero of 20 (0%) temporal bones were found to have violation of the ELD with preservation of the labyrinthine structures and the endolymphatic sac. Reviews of human and animal studies indicate that injury to the ELD may create endolymphatic hydrops, a known cause of hearing deterioration.

CONCLUSION

The ELD is not vulnerable to injury during IAC dissection using the middle fossa approach. A previous radiographic study has shown that the ELD is violated in 24% of temporal bones during retrosigmoid dissection of the IAC. These findings support and may help explain other outcome studies that show that long-term hearing results are superior with the use of the middle fossa approach when compared to results following retrosigmoid dissection.

Counseling Patients on Surgical Options for Treating Acoustic Neuroma

The selection of surgical approach for the removal of AN is a complex one, depending on factors related to specific tumor anatomy, patient characteristics, and the familiarity and skill level of the skull base team.Overall, the literature supports that surgical outcomes are acceptable in regard to tumor removal, patient safety, and complication rates. The inconsistent reporting methods in the current literature make it difficult to assess logically the rates for hearing preservation, facial nerve outcome, and complications as controlled for tumor size and other preoperative patient characteristics. The best conclusions would be from prospective surgical trials controlling for patient factors, size of the tumor, and experience of the skull base team. In the absence of such studies, formal meta-analyses may help clarify specific differences among approaches.