Radiosurgery for hemangiomas of the cavernous sinus and orbit: technical case report

Stereotactic radiosurgery for orbital cavernous venous malformation: a single center's experience for 15 years

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery such as Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has been shown to have a good treatment effect for orbital cavernous venous malformation (CVM). However, radiation-induced retinopathy or optic neuropathy is a vision-threatening complication of orbital irradiation. Predicting the post-treatment visual outcome is critical.

METHODS

Clinical and radiological outcomes were investigated in 30 patients who underwent GKRS for orbital CVM between July 2005 and February 2020. Measurement of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) was obtained in 14 patients.

RESULTS

The median clinical and radiological follow-up periods were 46.6 months (range, 15.9-105.8) and 27.5 months (range, 15.4-105.8), respectively. Twenty-eight patients underwent multisession (4 fractions) GKRS. The median cumulative marginal dose was 20 Gy (range, 16-24). Two patients underwent single-session GKRS. Marginal doses were 15 Gy and 10.5 Gy in each patient. The volume of CVM decreased in 29 (97%) patients. Visual acuity was improved in 6 (20%) patients and was stable in 22 (73%) patients. Visual field defect and exophthalmos were improved in all patients. Serial investigation of OCT showed no statistically significant difference in pRNFL thickness after GKRS. Patients with normal average pRNFL thickness showed better visual recovery than patients with thin average pRNFL thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

GKRS is an effective and safe treatment option for orbital CVM. The pRNFL thickness before GKRS can be a prognostic indicator for visual recovery in orbital CVM after GKRS.

Stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangioma: clinical outcome and visual function protection

PURPOSE

Although rare, orbital cavernous hemangioma (OCH) is the most common benign orbital neoplasm in adults and may cause vision disturbance or loss due to optic nerve compression. The conventional treatment is surgical excision, which carries a risk of intraoperative nerve damage, whereas gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) can be a safe and effective alternative. Herein, we report the results of four patients with OCH treated with GKRS, and describe the method of treatment including the optic nerve protection.

METHODS

This retrospective study included four consecutive patients (three women, one man; mean age: 50 ± 14.7 years) with OCH treated with single-session GKRS between 2014 and 2020. Three patients had decreased visual acuity. During GKRS, the prescription dose delivered to the tumor margin was 12 Gy at the 55-58% isodose line. The dose to the optic nerve margin was < 12 Gy. Follow-up included sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ophthalmological examinations at 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 29.5 ± 23 months (range, 12-63 months). After GKRS, three patients with visual dysfunction had substantial vision improvement; the fourth patient continued to have normal vision without deterioration. Radiological outcomes after GKRS indicated an average tumor shrinkage of 70% ± 10.6% at the 6-month follow-up and 83% ± 2.64% at the 1-year follow-up. No adverse radiation effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

GKRS for OCH achieved favorable clinical outcomes, with substantial tumor volume reduction. OCH can be diagnosed based on characteristic MRI findings. GKRS may be considered a treatment option for OCH in selected cases.

Multisession CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Orbital Cavernous Hemangiomas

Orbital cavernous hemangioma is a rare benign tumor that causes protrusion of the eye-ball and lowers visual acuity. Surgical resection is the first choice of treatment, however, it is challenging due to the anatomical structure of the orbit. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an established alternative treatment for any challenging microsurgery in the skull. Five cases of orbital cavernous hemangioma were successfully treated with multisession CyberKnife (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) stereotactic radiotherapy. The tumor volume ranged from 0.2 cc to 11.9 cc, all of which decreased in size after treatment. The radiation prescription dose ranged from 24 Gy to 26.1 Gy with fractions of 5 or 6. Visual acuity was preserved in all cases. Thus, multisession CyberKnife radiotherapy for orbital cavernous hemangioma might be a safe and effective treatment option.

Temporal Volume Change of Cavernous Sinus Cavernous Hemangiomas after Gamma Knife Surgery

Cavernous hemangiomas occur very rarely in the cavernous sinus. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) on cavernous sinus cavernous hemangioma (CSCH) and to analyze the temporal volume change. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 26 CSCH patients who were treated with GKS between 2001 and 2017. Before GKS, 11 patients (42.3%) had cranial neuropathies and 5 patients (19.2%) complained of headache, whereas 10 patients (38.5%) were initially asymptomatic. The mean pre-GKS mass volume was 9.3 mL (range, 0.5-31.6 mL), and the margin dose ranged from 13 to 15 Gy according to the mass volume and the proximity to the optic pathway. All cranial neuropathy patients and half of headache patients showed clinical improvement. All 26 patients achieved mass control; remarkable responses (less than 1/3 of the initial mass volume) were shown in 19 patients (73.1%) and moderate responses (more than 1/3 and less than 2/3) in 7 patients (26.9%). The mean final mass volume after GKS was 1.8 mL (range, 0-12.6 mL). The mean mass volume at 6 months after GKS was 45% (range, 5-80%) compared to the mass volume before GKS and 21% (range, 0-70%) at 12 months. The higher radiation dose tended to induce more rapid and greater volume reduction. No treatment-related complication was observed during the follow-up period. GKS could be an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for CSCH. GKS induced very rapid volume reduction compared to other benign brain tumors.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for hypervascular intracranial tumors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of SRS treatment of central neurocytomas (CNCs), cavernous sinus hemangiomas (CSHs), and glomus tumors (GTs); and to compare upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and adjuvant SRS in the treatment of these hypervascular tumors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of consecutive CNCs, CSHs, and GTs treated with SRS between 1993 and 2017. Tumor response was categorized based on volumetric analysis on magnetic resonance imaging: (1) tumor regression [> 10% decrease in tumor volume (TV)]; (2) stable tumor (≤ 10% change in TV); or (3) tumor progression (> 10% increase in TV).

RESULTS

Sixty hypervascular tumors (CNC: 28; CSH: 16; GT: 16) underwent SRS between 1993 and 2017. Margin doses were 13 Gy, 12 Gy, and 14 Gy for CNCs, CSHs, and GTs, respectively. Tumor regression was observed in 54 tumors (90%) with initial SRS after a median follow-up of 82 months. Relative reductions in TVs for CNCs were 38%, 52%, and 73% at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Relative reductions in TVs for CSHs were 51%, 68%, and 88% at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Relative reductions in TVs for GTs were 22%, 31%, and 47% at 12, 24, and 48 months, respectively. Upfront SRS was performed in 26 patients (43%). No difference in relative TV reductions were found between upfront and adjuvant SRS. Adverse radiation effects were observed in five patients. No mortality was encountered.

CONCLUSION

SRS for hypervascular tumors is associated with high rates of tumor regression with low risk of complications. No significant difference in rates of relative TV reduction were found between upfront and adjuvant SRS. Hence, upfront SRS may be considered in select patients.

Safety and efficacy of single-fraction gamma knife radiosurgery for benign confined cavernous sinus tumors: our experience and literature review

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has emerged as a suitable primary treatment option for confined cavernous sinus tumors (CSTs) and residual/recurrent benign tumors extending from the surrounding neighborhood. The aim of this review was to further investigate the safety and efficacy of single-fraction GKRS for primary confined CSTs (hemangioma, meningioma, and schwannoma). This was a retrospective analysis of 16 patients of CSTs, primarily treated with GKRS between 2009 and 2017. The patients underwent follow-up clinical and radiological evaluation at a regular interval. Data on clinical and imaging parameters were analyzed. The published literature on GKRS for CSTs was reviewed. There were total 16 patients (eight meningiomas, seven hemangiomas, and one schwannoma). Patients presented with a headache (56.3%), ptosis (50%), and/or restricted extraocular movements (50%). There was 46.6% tumor volume (TV) reduction after single-fraction GKRS. Hemangiomas showed best TV reduction (64% reduction at > 3-year follow-up) followed by schwannoma (41.5%) and meningioma (25.4%). 56.3% of patients developed transient hypoesthesia in trigeminal nerve distribution. 44.4% of patients became completely pain-free. Among cranial nerves, the superior division of the oculomotor nerve showed best outcome (ptosis 62.5%) followed by an improved range of EOM. There was no adverse event in the form of new-onset deficit, vascular complication, or malignant transformation except for one out of the field failures. Among available treatment options, GKRS is the most suitable option by virtue of its minimally invasive nature, optimal long-term tumor control, improvement in cranial neuropathies, cost-effectiveness, favorable risk-benefit ratio, and minimal long-term complications.

Review of Surgical Anatomy of the Tumors Involving Cavernous Sinus

The lesions involving cavernous sinus (CS) and lateral sellar region includes tumors, vascular lesions, infection, inflammation, and trauma. Tumors associated with CS cause significant distortion of the microanatomy posing an additional surgical challenge to the neurosurgeons. The surgical approach and microsurgical anatomy with respect to the origin and growth of the tumor within the CS region have not been comprehensively described in recent years. We conducted a review of literature concerning CS and associated tumors, complied through MEDLINE/OVID and using cross-references of articles on PubMed with the keywords cavernous sinus, CS tumors, pituitary adenoma, meningioma, schwannoma, chordoma, CS hemangiomas, extradural, interdural, intradural, skull base, gamma knife radiosurgery, endoscopic endonasal approach. Based on the tumor origin and growth pattern, the tumors associated with CS can be classified into three categories: Type-I: tumor originating from CS, Type-II: originating from lateral wall of CS, and Type-III: extraneous origin and occupying CS. The review focuses on approach to a tumor within each type of tumor in the CS region. The emphasis is that the tumor growth pattern and significant distortion of the CS anatomy caused by the tumor growth should be considered while planning the optimal surgical approach for tumors in this region to ensure complete tumor resection with minimal neurovascular morbidity.

Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cavernous sinus hemangiomas

The present retrospective study aimed to analyze the outcome of patients with cavernous sinus hemangioma (CSH) treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKS). Between August 2011 and April 2014, 7 patients with CSHs underwent GKS. GKS was performed as the sole treatment option in 5 patients, whilst partial resection had been performed previously in 1 patient and biopsy had been performed in 1 patient. The mean volume of the tumors at the time of GKS was 12.5±10.2 cm³ (range, 5.3-33.2 cm³), and the median prescription of peripheral dose was 14.0 Gy (range, 10.0-15.0 Gy). The mean follow-up period was 20 months (range, 6-40 months). At the last follow-up, the lesion volume had decreased in all patients, and all cranial neuropathies observed prior to GKS had improved. There were no radiation-induced neuropathies or complications during the follow-up period. GKS appears to be an effective and safe treatment modality for the management of CSHs.

Gamma knife surgery for a hemangioma of the cavernous sinus in a child

Cavernous sinus (CS) hemangiomas are rare vascular abnormalities that constitute 0.4%-2% of all lesions within the CS. Cavernous sinus hemangiomas are high-flow vascular tumors that tend to hemorrhage profusely during resection, leading to incomplete resection and high morbidity and mortality. While Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) has proven to be an effective treatment of CS hemangiomas in the adult population, few reports of GKS for treatment of CS hemangiomas exist in the pediatric literature. Here, the authors present the first case of a 15-year-old girl with a biopsy-proven CS hemangioma who achieved complete resolution of her symptoms and a complete imaging-defined response following GKS. If suspicion for a CS hemangioma is high in a pediatric patient, GKS may be considered as an effective treatment modality, thus avoiding the morbidities of open resection.

Are cavernous sinus hemangiomas and cavernous malformations different entities?

Cavernous hemangiomas that occur within the cavernous sinus (CS) are different from cerebral cavernous malformations (CMs) clinically, on imaging studies, and in their response to treatment. Moreover, CMs are true vascular malformations, whereas hemangiomas are benign vascular tumors. Because of these differences, the authors suggest that these two entities be analyzed and grouped separately. Unfortunately, despite these differences, much confusion exists in the literature as to the nature, behavior, and classification of these two distinct lesions. This confusion is exacerbated by subtle histological differences and the inconsistent use of nomenclature. The authors use the term "cavernous malformation" to refer to intraaxial lesions only; they prefer to use the term "cavernous sinus hemangioma" to refer to extraaxial, intradural hemangiomas of the CS.

A reappraisal of surgery for orbital tumors. Part I: extraorbital approaches

Orbital lesions are variable in nature and location. Their management can be challenging, and surgical intervention is often needed. Although a significant percentage of these tumors are treated by the ophthalmologist alone, collaboration with a neurosurgeon is often required, especially for tumors that are located deep within the orbit, are large, or have an intracranial extension. Technical advances and modifications in surgical technique have decreased surgery-related morbidity and increased its success. The authors describe their rationale in the choice of a surgical approach, the surgical techniques for extraorbital approaches, and the new surgical adjuvants.