Quantitative radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy predicts outcome of manual lymphatic therapy in breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper extremity

Lymphoscintigraphy for the Evaluation of Primary Lymphedema: A Scoring System Aimed at Harmonizing the Procedure and Interpretation and Increasing Reproducibility

ABSTRACT

The diagnostic workup of primary lymphedema includes lymphoscintigraphy, a diagnostic test that provides objective data derived from the characteristics of the lymphatic flow and the lymphatic nodes. Several empirical scoring systems have been proposed with the aim of harmonizing the procedure. Here we comment the latest one, reflecting on the relevance of these tools to make possible multicenter research, based on intraobserver and interobserver reliability with the aim to, in the long run, improve patient outcomes.

LYMPHOSCORE (Lymphoscintigraphy Scoring Reliability) Reliability of a New Qualitative and Semiquantitative Lymphoscintigraphy Scoring System for Primary Lymphedema

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

Primary lymphedema (PLE) is a rare chronic disorder. Extremity lymphoscintigraphy offers access for dynamic and functional information on peripheral lymphatics and lymph nodes. We aimed to assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability of a new lymphoscintigraphy quantitative and qualitative scoring system in a homogeneous population of adult patients followed for PLE of the lower limb(s).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a monocentric retrospective study. Clinical files of patients who underwent a lymphoscintigraphy were reviewed for inclusion. Lymphoscintigraphies were interpreted twice by 2 observers with a washout period. To assess intraobserver and interobserver reliability for both lower limbs, Cohen κ and Gwet's AC1 reliability coefficients were calculated with 95% confidence interval and P value of the zero-reliability comparison test. To interpret reliability coefficients, we used the orders of magnitude reported by Landis and Koch.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-four patients (288 limbs) with PLE were included. For intraobserver reliability, agreement range was 0.87-1 with an almost perfect agreement in all staging items of the score for both limbs with the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval ≥80%. Interobserver reliability was overall strong or almost perfect, ranging from 0.67 to 0.97.

CONCLUSIONS

This new scoring system demonstrated excellent intraobserver reliability and a very good interobserver reliability. Lymphoscintigraphy, when performed in a referral center and interpreted by trained nuclear medicine physicians, is a reliable means of investigation in patients with PLE of the lower limbs. This reproducibility advocates for further use of lymphoscintigraphy in multicentric cohorts of PLE patients.

Supermicrosurgical lymphovenous anastomosis

Lymphedema impairs patients' function and quality of life. Currently, supermicrosurgical lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is regarded as a significant and effective treatment for lymphedema. This article aims to review recent literature on this procedure, serving as a reference for future research and surgical advancements. Evolving since the last century, LVA has emerged as a pivotal domain within modern microsurgery. It plays a crucial role in treating lymphatic disorders. Recent literature discusses clinical imaging, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and efficacy. Combining advanced tools, precise imaging, and surgical skills, LVA provides a safer and more effective treatment option for lymphedema patients, significantly enhancing their quality of life. This procedure also presents new challenges and opportunities in the realm of microsurgery.

Evaluating the Surgical Outcome of Lymphovenous Anastomosis in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Using Tc-99m Phytate Lymphoscintigraphy: Preliminary Results

Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) remains a significant postcancer treatment challenge with no definitive cure. Recent supermicrosurgical treatments, such as lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), have shown promise but lack established objective indicators for outcome evaluation. We investigated the utility of Technetium-99m (Tc-99m) lymphoscintigraphy, an imaging technique providing objective information on lymphatic fluid flow, for assessing LVA surgical outcomes. Methods and Results: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing LVA for BCRL was conducted. Lymphoscintigraphy images pre- and 1-year postsurgery were compared to determine changes in lymphatic fluid flow of 18 patients based on newly defined parameters "uptake ratio" and "washout rates." Statistically significant reduction in the uptake ratio was observed in the forearm at 30 and 60 minutes postinjection phases. In addition, the forearm showed higher washout rate, indicating an improved lymphatic function in the forearm. Conclusion: Tc-99m lymphoscintigraphy can provide valuable objective data for evaluating LVA surgical outcomes in BCRL patients. However, site-specific differences in outcomes highlight the need for individualized surgical planning. Further large-scale studies are necessary to validate these preliminary findings and develop a standardized approach for LVA assessment.

Lymphatic remapping by long-term lymphoscintigraphy follow-up in secondary lymphedema after breast cancer surgery

The purpose of the study is to investigate long-term changes on lymphoscintigraphy and their association with clinical factors in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) patients. This single-center cohort study included BCRL patients who underwent baseline and follow-up lymphoscintigraphy. The percentage of excessive circumference (PEC) of the affected upper limb compared with the unaffected side was used as an indicator of the clinical severity of BCRL. Each 99mTc-phytate lymphoscintigraphy image was categorized according to the Taiwan lymphoscintigraphy staging system. Clinical parameters and the lymphoscintigraphy stage at baseline and follow-up were compared and analyzed. Eighty-seven patients were included. Baseline and follow-up lymphoscintigraphies were performed at median 7 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2‒14) and 78 (IQR: 49‒116) months after surgery, respectively. Both lymphoscintigraphy stage and PEC showed variable change with overall increases in their severity. Stepwise multivariable analysis revealed follow-up lymphoscintigraphy stage (P = 0.001) to be independent variables for PEC at follow-up, however, baseline lymphoscintigraphy stage was not. The clinical courses of BCRL and patients' lymphoscintigraphy patterns showed diverse changes over long-term follow-up. In addition to initial lymphoscintigraphy for diagnosis, lymphatic remapping by follow-up lymphoscintigraphy can be useful to visualize functional changes in the lymphatic system that may guide the optimal management in BCRL.

The Role of Imaging of Lymphatic System to Prevent Cancer Related Lymphedema

Lymphedema is a progressive chronic condition affecting approximately 250 million people worldwide, a number that is currently underestimated. In Western countries, the most common form of lymphedema of the extremities is cancer-related and less radical surgical intervention is the main option to prevent it. Standardized protocols in the areas of diagnosis, staging and treatment are strongly required to address this issue. The aim of this study is to review the main diagnostic methods, comparing new emerging procedures to lymphoscintigraphy, considered as the golden standard to date. The roles of Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography (MRL) or indocyanine green ICG lymphography are particularly reviewed in order to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, potential associations with lymphoscintigraphy, and future directions guided by AI protocols. The use of imaging to treat lymphedema has benefited from new techniques in the area of lymphatic vessels anatomy; these perspectives have become of value in many clinical scenarios to prevent cancer-related lymphedema.

A pilot study of lymphoscintigraphy with tracer injection into the human brain

Many groups have reported lymphatic and glymphatic structures in animal and human brains, but tracer injection into the human brain to demonstrate real-time lymphatic drainage and mapping has not been described. We enrolled patients undergoing standard-of-care resection or stereotactic biopsy for suspected intracranial tumors. Patients received peritumoral injections of 99mTc-tilmanocept followed by planar or tomographic imaging. Fourteen patients with suspected brain tumors were enrolled. One was excluded from analysis because of tracer leakage during injection. There was no drainage of 99mTc-tilmanocept to regional lymph nodes in any of the patients. On average, after correcting for radioactive decay, 70.7% (95% CI: 59.9%, 81.6%) of the tracer in the injection site and 78.1% (95% CI: 71.1%, 85.1%) in the whole-head on the day of surgery remained the morning after, with variable radioactivity in the subarachnoid space. The retained fraction was much greater than expected based on the clearance rate from non-brain injection sites. In this pilot study, the lymphatic tracer 99mTc-tilmanocept was injected into the brain parenchyma, and there was no drainage outside the brain to the cervical lymph nodes. Our work demonstrates an inefficiency of drainage from peritumoral brain parenchyma and highlights a therapeutic opportunity to improve immunosurveillance of the brain.

Pneumatic Compression-Assisted Lymphoscintigraphy for Quantitative Evaluation of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

OBJECTIVES

Acquired lymphedema of upper extremity is a chronic pathologic status that frequently occurs after breast cancer treatment. Reliable and quantitative evaluation of lymphedema is crucial for successful management of patients. Although lymphoscintigraphy is the primary investigation for the confirmation and evaluation of lymphedema, the specific protocol of stress intervention is not well established. This study aims to introduce intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) as a part of stress lymphoscintigraphy and compare the effectiveness of conventional stress lymphoscintigraphy (CSL) and pneumatic compression-assisted lymphoscintigraphy (PCAL).

METHODS

Our study was designed as a retrospective analysis of 85 breast cancer patients with lymphedema who underwent lymphoscintigraphy utilizing either IPC device or conventional stress maneuver and received complex decongestive therapy. The flow extent of the lymphatic fluid (FE) was evaluated using a 0- to 4-point scale based on lymphoscintigraphic images. The visualization of lymph nodes was also assessed. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by changes in side-to-side circumferential and volume differences of upper extremities and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients, 47 underwent CSL, and 38 underwent PCAL. Participants with relatively preserved flow extent of the lymphatic fluid (FE 3) showed a significant difference in percentage reduction of volume (PRV) between CSL and PCAL groups (P = 0.036). In the other groups, CSL and PCAL demonstrated comparable differences in PRV without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that participants in the PCAL group with relatively preserved lymphatic flow extent (FE 3) had better PRV compared with those in the CSL group. The use of IPC devices in lymphoscintigraphy with the novel stress maneuver can help in the quantitative description of lymphedema status and the selection of an appropriate treatment method.

Lymphoscintigraphic Indications in the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Secondary Lymphedema

Secondary lymphedema is caused by damage to the lymphatic system, often following an oncological tumor removal intervention, or even by an accident. The diagnosis of lymphedema is not easy, because the disease can also be confused with other clinical manifestations (for example, venous insufficiency edema), though an experienced Lymphologist is usually able to diagnose it with good accuracy. To confirm the diagnosis, it is often necessary to resort to specialist imaging tests for an anatomo-functional definition of the pathology. Among these, lymphoscintigraphy is confirmed as the “gold standard” procedure for the diagnosis of lymphedema. Lymphoscintigraphy has been included in the Italian Guidelines by the Ministry of Health.

Predictive role of lymphoscintigraphy undergoing lymphovenous anastomosis in patients with lower extremity lymphedema: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether preoperative lymphoscintigraphy could predict the treatment response of unilateral lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) in patients with lower extremity lymphedema.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 17 patients undergoing lymphoscintigraphy subsequent to LVA was included. As qualitative lymphoscintigraphic indicators, ilioinguinal lymph node uptake, main lymphatic vessel, collateral vessel, and four types of dermal backflow patterns (absent; distal only; proximal only; whole lower limb) were evaluated. Lymph node uptake ratio, extremity uptake ratio, and injection site clearance ratio were obtained as quantitative lymphoscintigraphic indicators at 1 and 2-h after injection. To evaluate therapy response, the volume difference ratio of the whole lower limb at 3 months (early response) and 1 year (late response) was measured. Volume difference ratios (continuous variable and binary variable with a cut-off value of zero) were compared according to the lymphoscintigraphic variables.

RESULTS

The group with whole lower limb dermal backflow had a greater volume change than the other groups (p = 0.047). The group with dermal backflow in the whole lower limb OR only in the distal part had a higher rate of volume reduction than the group with dermal backflow only in the proximal part OR absent (p = 0.050). The 2-h extremity uptake ratio was the only indicator that positively correlated with early and late volume difference ratio (p = 0.016, p = 0.001). The rate of volume decrease at 1 year was high in patients with high 2-h extremity uptake ratio (p = 0.027). As the amount of dermal backflow increases, the postoperative therapeutic effect increases (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is useful to predict both early and late therapy response in patients with lower extremity lymphedema undergoing LVA. Both dermal backflow pattern and extremity uptake ratio may be predictive lymphoscintigraphic indicators.

Lymphoscintigraphy as an Outcome Measurement for Conservative Upper Limb Lymphedema Treatments: A Systematic Review

Introduction: The impact of conservative interventions on lymphatic function and the relationship to clinical outcomes is currently unknown. A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate studies that used lymphoscintigraphy to measure outcomes from conservative intervention for secondary arm lymphedema and to explore the relationship between changes in the lymphoscintigraphy and clinical outcomes. Methods and Results: Five databases were systematically searched using the selection criteria: randomized controlled trials (RCTs); quasi-RCTs; pre/post and cohort studies; upper limb secondary lymphedema; use of lymphoscintigraphy as an outcome measure; and conservative intervention. Seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Compression, exercise, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and pharmacological interventions were evaluated using lymphoscintigraphy. There was heterogeneity with all aspects of the lymphoscintigraphy techniques, including radioisotope used, injection location, use of exercise, and imaging sequence between the studies as well as the outcome analysis. Also most studies did not show a relationship between the clinical and lymphoscintigraphy outcomes measured. Conclusions: Lymphoscintigraphy has not been used regularly or recently to evaluate conservative upper limb lymphedema treatment outcomes. Lack of standardization of lymphoscintigraphy protocols and lack of consensus and understanding of the lymphoscintigraphy analyses used to measure the outcomes of diverse conservative lymphedema interventions currently limit the use of lymphoscintigraphy as an outcome measure. Further research adopting recent guidelines to standardize lymphoscintigraphy and use of reliable analysis techniques that measure the physiological impact of the chosen conservative lymphedema intervention is recommended to evaluate the impact of conservative interventions on lymphatic function.

Predictors of severity of lymphosclerosis in extremity lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an accepted method for treating lymphedema, and its efficacy could be greatly affected by the severity of lymphosclerosis. In the present study, we analyzed the intraoperative findings of lymphatic ducts in our patients who had undergone LVA to find predictive factors for the severity of lymphosclerosis.

METHODS

The medical records of the patients who had undergone LVA for managing extremity lymphedema from September 2017 to December 2020 were reviewed. The severity of lymphosclerosis was evaluated intraoperatively under a surgical microscope and stratified using the NECST (normal, ectasia, contraction, sclerosis type) classification. Patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), lymphoscintigraphy stage, and lymphatic duct locations were included for analysis.

RESULTS

Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that location in a lower extremity (regression coefficient, -0.38; P = .03) and more advanced Taiwan lymphoscintigraphy stage (regression coefficient, 0.27; P < .001) were associated with more severe lymphosclerosis. In a subgroup analysis of lower extremity lymphedema, in addition to the Taiwan lymphoscintigraphy stage (regression coefficient, 0.24; P < .001), age (regression coefficient, 0.02; P = .001), and BMI (regression coefficient, 0.04; P = .005) were also associated with the severity of lymphosclerosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of lymphosclerosis in extremity lymphedema correlated positively with the Taiwan lymphoscintigraphy stage and was more severe in lower limb lymphedema. In lower limb lymphedema, a higher BMI and older age also contributed to more severe lymphosclerosis.

Lymphatic Imaging: Current Noninvasive and Invasive Techniques

After nearly disappearing, invasive lymphangiography not only has resurged, but new approaches have been developed to guide lymphatic interventions. At the same time, noninvasive lymphatic imaging is playing a larger role in the evaluation of lymphatic pathologies. Lymphangioscintigraphy, computed tomography lymphangiography, and magnetic resonance lymphangiography are increasingly being used as alternatives to invasive diagnostic lymphangiography. The purpose of this article is to review current invasive and noninvasive lymphatic imaging techniques.

Indocyanine Green Lymphography and Lymphoscintigraphy Severity Stage Showed Strong Correlation in Lower Limb Lymphedema

Background: To examine the correlation between lymphedema severity on lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography in patients with secondary lower extremity lymphedema. Methods and Results: The maximal circumference difference (MCD) between the two legs was recorded. Lymphoscintigraphy and ICG lymphography images were classified into type I to V according to dermal backflow (DB) stage and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) stage based on lymphatic flow preservation and how DB was extended. Correlation between the scales was analyzed. Forty-four patients attended our hospital for evaluation of secondary lower extremity lymphedema. The most common cause of lymphedema was a postoperative complication of a malignant tumor (32 patients; 72.5%). Correlation analysis showed that lymphoscintigraphy and ICG DB (anterior) stage (r = 0.92), lymphoscintigraphy and ICG DB (posterior) stage (r = 0.94), and lymphoscintigraphy and MDACC stage (r = 0.93) exhibited very strong positive correlations. Intrarater agreement between lymphoscintigraphy and ICG DB (posterior) stage was substantial (κ = 0.65), and moderate between lymphoscintigraphy and ICG DB (anterior) stage (κ = 0.59) and lymphoscintigraphy and MDACC stage (κ = 0.52). Lymphedema severity stages and MCDs exhibited moderate positive correlations. Conclusion: Lymphoscintigraphy and ICG lymphography stage were strongly and positively correlated. These studies can work synergistically as complementary studies of lymphedema severity.

Use of magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of therapeutic response in breast cancer-related lymphedema: A systematic review

Breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a common comorbidity in breast cancer survivors. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to evaluate therapeutic response of patients with various medical conditions, it is not routinely used to evaluate lymphedema patients. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies on the use of MRI to evaluate therapy for BCRL. We hypothesized that MRI could provide information otherwise not possible through other examinations. On October 21, 2019, we conducted a systematic review on the PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases, without time frame or language limitations, to identify studies on the use of MRI to evaluate therapy for BCRL. We excluded studies that investigated other applications of MRI, such as lymphedema diagnosis and surgical planning. Of 63 potential articles identified with the search, three case series fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In total, 53 patients with BCRL were included and quantitatively evaluated with MRI before and after manual lymphatic drainage. Authors used MRI or MR lymphagiography to investigate factors such as lymphatic vessel cross-sectional area, tissue water relaxation time (T₂), and chemical exchange saturation transfer. The only study that compared MRI measurement with standard examinations reported that MRI added information to the therapy evaluation. MRI seems to be a promising tool for quantitative measurement of therapeutic response in patients with BCRL. However, the identified studies focused on only manual lymphatic drainage and were limited by the small numbers of patients. More studies are necessary to shed light on the topic.

Prognostic Factors of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphic Findings in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Background: To evaluate the usefulness of quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy in predicting the effects of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed patients with unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) who underwent pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy and completed 2 weeks of CDT. A total of 18 patients with unilateral BCRL clinical stage II underwent 30-minute sessions of CDT five times per week for 2 weeks. The quantitative asymmetry index (QAI) of the upper extremity, axillary lymph node (LN) uptake, and axillary plus supraclavicular LN uptake from lymphoscintigraphy were calculated. The volume of lymphedema was calculated by percentage excess volume (PEV) at initial and posttreatment. The CDT response was assessed using percentage reduction in excess volume (PREV). Correlation analyses were conducted using Kendall tau rank correlation. There was positive correlation between upper extremity QAI at 2 hours and initial PEV. Negative correlations were found between axillary LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV, and between axillary plus supraclavicular LN QAI at 1, 2 hours, and initial PEV. The PREV showed a positive correlation with axillary LN QAI at 2 hours after injection (tau-b = 0.354, p = 0.041). Conclusion: Quantitative findings of pretherapy lymphoscintigraphy have potential value for use in predicting the response to CDT in patients with upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Using QAIs from lymphoscintigraphy, we could estimate the excess volume of lymphedema.

Lymphoscintigraphy for the diagnosis of extremity lymphedema: Current controversies regarding protocol, interpretation, and clinical application

Appropriate diagnosis, staging and a further selection of the best treatment are fundamental for the management of patients with extremity lymphedema. Several clinical and imaging tools have been described for these purposes. Lymphoscintigraphy is still considered the gold standard imaging modality for diagnosing lymphedema. However, protocol variability and poor image resolution can make the interpretation challenging. Here, we reviewed technical aspects of lymphoscintigraphy, interpretation of the lymphoscintigraphy findings, staging, and its clinical application.

The New Possibility of Lymphoscintigraphy to Guide a Clinical Treatment for Lymphedema in Patient With Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Lymphedema is a chronic disease that occurs frequently after breast cancer treatment. For the treatment of lymphedema, surgical approach such as vascularized lymph node transfer and super-microscopic lymphovenous anastomosis surgery is well established. Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) and sympathetic ganglion block (SGB) are two non-surgical therapeutic options. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lymphoscintigraphy in guiding the selection of the optimal non-surgical treatment in lymphedema.

METHODS

A total of 81 lymphedema patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy and were treated with CDT or SGB were retrospectively evaluated. The parameters for the lymphoscintigraphic findings included the extent of dermal backflow (small extent/large extent groups), the level of lymphatic flow (trunk flow pattern/upper arm-restricted pattern/forearm-restricted pattern groups), and the visualization of lymph nodes (visualized/non-visualized groups). The change in the circumferential difference between the two sides of the body at the upper arm and forearm was used as the clinical outcome variable. Paired comparison and group comparison analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

Of 81 patients, 41 received CDT and 40 received SGB. There were no significant differences in demographic data between the CDT and SGB groups. Both CDT and SGB had a significant therapeutic effect. Upper arm edema was more significantly reduced after SGB than after CDT in the small extent group (P = 0.004), the forearm-restricted pattern group (P = 0.002), and the non-visualized group (P = 0.018). In the other groups, SGB and CDT showed comparable therapeutic effects without statistical differences.

CONCLUSION

SGB was found to have a better therapeutic effect in the lymphedema patients with specific lymphoscintigraphic findings compared with CDT. Lymphoscintigraphy may be helpful in selecting the appropriate approach to lymphedema treatment. Further well-designed prospective studies are warranted to validate the findings of this study.

Correlation of L-Dex Bioimpedance Spectroscopy with Limb Volume and Lymphatic Function in Lymphedema

Background: Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is an established tool for the measurement of extracellular fluid in lymphedema. This study assesses the validity of BIS measurements using the l-Dex^® for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to treat lymphedema. Measurements are correlated with limb volume, assessment of pitting edema, physiologic measures of lymphatic function, and response to surgical intervention. Three l-Dex BIS metrics are compared. Methods and Results: This retrospective study of prospectively collected data identified consecutive patients with lymphedema. l-Dex BIS measurements, limb volume measurements using perometry, transport index (TI) evaluation using radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy, staging using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent lymphography, and clinical evaluation of degree of pitting edema were compared to examine correlations. l-Dex BIS metrics included the l-Dex ratio, absolute difference between the affected and unaffected extremities, and their unadjusted ratio. The study included 26 patients with 70 sets of evaluations. There were significant correlations between the l-Dex ratio and limb volume ratio (LVR) using perometry, the degree of pitting edema, TI evaluation using lymphoscintigraphy, and staging using ICG lymphography. Of the l-Dex BIS metrics, the l-Dex ratio correlated most closely with all measures (ρ = 0.71-0.94, p < 0.0001). Following complete decongestive therapy, the mean decrease in the l-Dex ratio was 48.3% whereas the corresponding mean reduction in limb volume was 13.8% (ρ = 0.19; p = 0.65); subsequent physiological surgery including lymphovenous bypass and vascularized lymph node transfer resulted in an average reduction in l-Dex ratio of 36.1% and mean limb volume reduction of 25.2% (ρ = 0.38; p = 0.27). Conclusions: L-Dex BIS measurements demonstrate face, construct, and criterion validity, and correlate with clinical assessment, LVR, physiologic measures of lymphatic function, and response to conservative and surgical intervention. The L-Dex ratio correlates most closely with all measures and is the recommended metric when using BIS.

Imaging lymphatics in human normal and lymphedema limbs-Usefulness of various modalities for evaluation of lymph and edema fluid flow pathways and dynamics

The human lymphatic system morphology and function still remain largely unknown to clinicians and biologists. How does the lymphatic vascular system look like in comparison to the blood transport system, how does lymph flow, where does capillary filtrate accumulate in cases with lymphatic obstruction caused by inflammation, trauma, and cancer therapy, remain as basic questions. Visualization of the lymphatic pathways and dynamics of lymph flow, and in cases of obstruction, the localization of the capillary filtrate/edema fluid accumulation becomes indispensable. The contemporary methods only partly meet these requirements. Since the early 1950s of the 20th century only few specific clinical methods of imaging of limb lymphatics are being used in human clinic. Each of the applied modalities provides different images due to different physical chemistry and distribution of tracer, methods used for its detection in tissues, their sensitivity and specificity and clinical type of lymph vessel pathology. Here, the advantages and disadvantages of the most commonly used 3 methods of imaging: the iodinated oil X-ray, isotopic, and fluorescent lympangiographies are presented. The study is based on retrospective and recent collections of lymphangiograms from large cohorts of patients. Imaging of lymph nodes has not been included as it is requiring different interpretation compared with vessels. Composite evaluation of X-ray, isotopic, and fluorescent lymphographic images or, as it is practiced now the isotope and indocyanine green near infrared lymphographies, provide most clinically important information. Special attention was directed at methods enabling early diagnosis of imminent lymphedema especially in cases with cancer therapy-related lymphedema. Groups of typical images obtained with the 3 methods are presented.

An Assessment of the Relationship Between Abdominal Obesity and the Severity of Upper Extremity Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Obesity is one of the well-known initiating and aggravating factors of lymphedema. Body mass index (BMI) is typically used to define obesity, but in Asian populations, health risks are elevated at lower BMI levels, and abdominal fat may be a better obesity metric. Thus, we assessed the potential association between abdominal obesity and lymphedema severity in postoperative breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-three women with breast cancer-related lymphedema participated in this study. Arm circumference was measured at four locations per arm to identify the maximal circumference difference (MCD) between the affected and unaffected sides. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy, and we calculated the quantitative asymmetry index (QAI) of both arms. A computed tomography was also performed to assess abdominal obesity after lymphedema. Abdominal obesity was classified as a visceral fat cross-sectional area larger than 70 cm². Fourteen women (42%) were obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m²), and 18 women (54%) had increased abdominal fat. BMI obesity and abdominal obesity were significantly correlated, but five patients were classified with abdominal obesity, despite a BMI below 25 kg/m². The mean arm circumference difference was 2.8 ± 2.4 cm. Decreased axillary QAI was significantly correlated with obesity, and increased arm edema (MCD ≥2 cm) was significantly correlated with abdominal obesity.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal obesity was significantly correlated with increased MCD and should be considered along with obesity as an aggravating factor for lymphedema severity.

Evaluation of lymphatic compensation by lymphoscintigraphy in the postoperative period of breast cancer surgery with axillary dissection

Objective

To evaluate postoperative lymphatic compensation in the upper limb after mastectomy with axillary dissection.

Subjects and methods

Twenty-three patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy before and 60 days after surgery were enrolled from September 2006 to June 2007, in Campinas, Brazil. Protocol examination consisted in static imaging of each upper limb in semi-flexion and thoracic imaging after 10 min and 1 and 2 hr after subcutaneous injection of 1 mCi (37 MBq) of 99mTc dextran into the dorsum of the hand. A comparative analysis was made of hepatic uptake of the radiopharmaceutical, velocity of axillary lymph node visualization (I, visible at 10 min; II, at 1 hr; III, at 2 hr; IV, not visible) and degree (intensity) of uptake (a, marked; b, moderate; c, mild; d, absent) before and 60 days after surgery.

Results

In the preoperative period, 3 (13%) patients were considered to have an optimal pattern (Ia) and 2 (9%) showed total involvement (IVd). Compared to velocity in the postoperative period, 9 (39%) patients showed no difference, 5 (22%) improved, 9 (39%) became worse, and one was considerably worse. Regarding the degree, 10 (43%) patients showed no difference, 9 (39%) became worse, and 4 (17%) improved. Regarding classification, 2 (9%) patients had an optimal lymphatic pattern (Ia) and 3 (13%) had total involvement (IVd). No patient presented decreased hepatic uptake after surgical treatment.

Conclusions

The study found relevant changes in preoperative and postoperative lymphoscintigraphy, demonstrating the existence of functional differences in the lymphatic system of the upper limb. Alterations in lymphatic drainage pattern may already be perceived 60 days postoperatively, as can signs of lymphovenous anastomoses.

Tc-99m-Human Serum Albumin Transit Time as a Measure of Arm Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

BACKGROUND

Lymphoscintigraphy has often been used for evaluating arm lymphatic dysfunction, but no optimal approach for quantification has so far emerged. We propose a quantifiable measure of lymphatic function that we applied in patients treated for breast cancer.

METHODS

Eleven patients, aged 34-68 years, with unilateral arm lymphedema following breast cancer treatment underwent bilateral lymphoscintigraphy using intradermal injection in both hands of technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin and sequential 5 min imaging for 5 hours. The mean transit time (MTT) in the arms was calculated based on time activity curves generated from injection site and arm regions. Visual lymphedema scoring was performed based on dermal backflow and lymph node presence. Excess arm volume was calculated from circumference measurements.

RESULTS

The MTT (mean ± SD) was significantly longer in the lymphedema arm than in the normal arm: 60.1 ± 27.7 versus 5.4 ± 2.5 minutes (mean difference, 54.7 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 36.5-72.9 minutes; P < 0.0001). Patients with previous erysipelas infection had significantly longer MTT than other patients (mean difference, 43.7 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 18.6-68.7 minutes; P < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between MTT and excess arm volume (r = 0.64; P = 0.04) and number of lymph nodes removed (r = 0.65; P = 0.03) but no correlation between visual score and MTT.

CONCLUSION

Measurements of MTT were able to discriminate lymphedema from healthy arm and MTT correlated with relevant markers for lymphedema severity. We encourage further research using the MTT approach for monitoring lymphedema and evaluation of treatment response.

Evaluation of the Upper Limb Lymphatic System: A Prospective Lymphoscintigraphic Study in Melanoma Patients and Healthy Controls

BACKGROUND

Current research on the upper limb lymphatic system mainly studies breast cancer patients with unilateral lymphedema. Without preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, the contralateral limb is used as a control, assuming that it is functionally intact. Few lymphoscintigraphic studies investigate patients before any axillary surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, through lymphoscintigraphy, the preoperative condition of the upper limb lymphatic system in melanoma patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

Two groups were studied: the study group (16 patients with trunk/upper limb melanoma candidates for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy) and the control group (10 healthy volunteers). All subjects underwent upper limb lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphoscintigraphic images were classified into three patterns based on the tracer appearance time in the axillary nodes. Type I, 20 minutes; type II, 60 minutes; and type III, 120 minutes. Statistical analysis was used to assess the relationship between lymphoscintigraphic patterns and clinical variables and to compare patterns of distribution.

RESULTS

Lymphoscintigraphic patterns were asymmetric in 37.5 percent (study group) and 50 percent (control group). Type III was the most common pattern. There was no significant association between lymphoscintigraphic patterns and considered clinical variables. There was no significant difference in the lymphoscintigraphic pattern distribution of the two groups (p = 0.870).

CONCLUSION

The authors' findings show wide differences and an often "slow" tracer appearance time in patients with intact lymphatic system, questioning the use of contralateral limb as control and transportation time greater than 30 minutes as criteria for identification of lymphatic alterations.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, IV.

Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer

Objective

To evaluate the validity of quantitative lymphoscintigraphy as a useful lymphedema assessment tool for patients with breast cancer surgery including axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

We recruited 72 patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery that included ALND. Circumferences in their upper limbs were measured in five areas: 15 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle (LE), the elbow, 10 cm distal to the LE, the wrist, and the metacarpophalangeal joint. Then, maximal circumference difference (MCD) was calculated by subtracting the unaffected side from the affected side. Quantitative asymmetry indices (QAI) were defined as the radiopharmaceutical uptake ratios of the affected side to the unaffected side. Patients were divided into 3 groups by qualitative lymphoscintigraphic patterns: normal, decreased function, and obstruction.

Results

The MCD was highest in the qualitative obstruction (2.76±2.48) pattern with significant differences from the normal (0.69±0.78) and decreased function (1.65±1.17) patterns. The QAIs of the axillary LNs showed significant differences among the normal (0.82±0.29), decreased function (0.42±0.41), and obstruction (0.18±0.16) patterns. As the QAI of the axillary LN increased, the MCD decreased. The QAIs of the upper limbs were significantly higher in the obstruction (3.12±3.07) pattern compared with the normal (1.15±0.10) and decreased function (0.79±0.30) patterns.

Conclusion

Quantitative lymphoscintigraphic analysis is well correlated with both commonly used qualitative lymphoscintigraphic analysis and circumference differences in the upper limbs of patients with breast cancer surgery with ALND. Quantitative lymphoscintigraphy may be a good alternative assessment tool for diagnosing lymphedema after breast cancer surgery with ALND.

Clinical Significance of Lymphoscintigraphy Findings in the Evaluation of Lower Extremity Lymphedema

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of lymphoscintigraphy imaging in the evaluation of lower extremity lymphedema.

METHODS

Technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid was injected subcutaneously in the first web spaces of both feet of 123 patients (M/F: 43/80, mean age 57.5±13.1 years, range 16-78 years) who had clinical evidence of lower extremity swelling with suspicion of lymphedema, and were referred for routine lymphoscintigraphy. Lymphoscintigraphy scan was started as dynamic viewing followed by static whole body imaging at 10 minute, 1 hour and 4 hours after injection.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients had lymphedema. Patients who had lymphedema were divided into two groups according to their scintigraphy findings: Group I included 58 patients without uptake in the popliteal nodes, and group II included 29 patients with positive popliteal nodes. The rate of popliteal node visualization was higher in patients with dermal backflow as compared to those without dermal backflow (p<0.001). The duration of lymphedema was also longer in patients with dermal backflow and popliteal nodes (p<0.004).

CONCLUSION

Lymphoscintigraphy is a reliable, easily applied and well-tolerated objective method to diagnose lower extremity lymphedema. Uptake by popliteal lymph nodes and the presence of dermal backflow on lymphoscintigraphy, which is performed for evaluation of the lower limb lymphedema, were important signs indicating longer disease duration and higher severity of lymphatic dysfunction.

Symptoms: Lymphedema

Lymphedema is one of the main late effects from breast cancer treatment affecting 3-60% of breast cancer survivors. Primarily occurring in the hand, arm, and/or affected breast, symptoms of lymphedema include swelling, pain, redness, restriction of arm/hand movement, tightness and feelings of fullness. These symptoms not only may limit physical functioning but also negatively affect quality of life, body image, social functioning, and financial status of breast cancer survivors with lymphedema. Unfortunately, there are no standardized methods for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Despite its prevalence and lack of clinical guidelines, lymphedema is one of the most poorly understood, relatively underestimated, and least researched complications of cancer treatment. This chapter reviews the current problem of breast cancer-related lymphedema by investigating prevention and risk reduction strategies, diagnosis, and treatment. In addition, this chapter identifies future research opportunities focusing on prevention and risk reduction strategies, quality of life and physical function, surveillance, patient education, cost, diagnosis, and treatment. Challenges and recommendations for future research in these areas, particularly among underserved populations, are discussed.

Lymphatic mapping and lymphedema surgery in the breast cancer patient

Upper limb lymphedema can be an unfortunate sequela following the oncologic treatment of breast cancer. The surgical treatment of lymphedema has had a recent renewed clinical interest paralleling innovative descriptions of surgical techniques and imaging modalities. In addition, an improved understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of lymphedema has allowed improved translation to the clinical condition. Various surgical options exist to decrease the symptom-burden of upper limb lymphedema, including vascularized lymph node (VLN) transfer, lymphovenous bypass (LVB), liposuction, lymphatic grafting, and excisional procedures. Modern imaging techniques help to improve the consistency and accuracy of these surgical treatment options. A multi-modal treatment plan utilizing non-operative and surgical therapies has the potential to improve various factors related to overall patient quality of life. This review details all of the current operative treatment strategies and modern imaging modalities used in the treatment of lymphedema.

Bridging the divide between pathogenesis and detection in lymphedema

While our understanding of the lymphatic system has improved substantially in the past few decades, the translation of this knowledge into improved healthcare solutions for patients suffering from secondary lymphedema has been severely limited. The challenge facing clinicians is two-fold. First, there is no reliable, affordable, diagnostic capable of detecting the disease before symptoms of the lymphedema develop and the efficacy of treatment options becomes limited. Second, our understanding of the disease pathogenesis, its risk factors, and the underlying physiologic mechanisms is still in its infancy. These two challenges go hand in hand as limited diagnostic options have hindered our ability to understand lymphedema progression, and the lack of known underlying mechanisms involved in the disease prohibits the development of new diagnostic targets. This review serves to discuss the recent developments in clinical and lab research settings of both lymphedema diagnostic technologies and our understanding of the mechanisms driving disease risk and progression. We will show how these two lines of research are synergistically working with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes for those suffering from this horrible disease, identifying key areas of further research that are warranted to move the field forward and provide clinical relief for this neglected patient population.

Reproducibility of lymphoscintigraphic evaluation of the upper limb

BACKGROUND

Although reproducibility studies are missing, a lymphoscintigraphic evaluation of the upper limb is often used in routine practice to diagnose lymphedema and in clinical research, for example, to investigate the effect of a physical treatment. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the reproducibility of the lymphoscintigraphic evaluation of the upper limb.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In breast cancer patients, 20 lymphoscintigraphic evaluations of the upper limb were performed on two test occasions with an interval of 1 week. (99m)Tc nanocol was injected subcutaneously in the hand. A standardized protocol was applied. In the early phase, two static images of the injection places were taken and in between dynamic images of both axilla during 40 min (15 min rest, 15 min squeezing a ball, and 15 min rest). After a break of 70 min, a static image of the injection places and of the axilla was made. At the end, a partial whole body image was acquired. A strong reproducibility was found for the following quantitative variables (ICC 0.75 to 0.85): change of uptake in axilla during the break; change of extraction from hands during the break; and extraction and uptake in the late phase. The other quantitative variables (i.e., extraction form the hands in the early phase, time of arrival, accumulation rate, and uptake in axilla in the early phase) had weak to moderatie reproducibility (ICC 0.07 to 0.70). All qualitative variables (i.e., number of lymph nodes in the axilla, upper arm and elbow/lower arm, gradation of lymph collectors in upper or lower arm and of dermal backflow, and presence of lymph collaterals) had strong to very strong reproducibility (ICC 0.76 to 1.00).

CONCLUSION

A lymphoscintigraphy of the upper limb is a reproducible imaging tool to assess lymph transport quantitatively and qualitatively.

Prognostic value of lymphoscintigraphy in patients with gynecological cancer-related lymphedema

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We investigated the prognostic value of qualitative lymphoscintigraphy in gynecological cancer-related lymphedema, which is a common complication after treatment.

METHODS

All 152 patients underwent (99m) Tc tin-colloid lymphoscintigraphy before complex decongestive therapy (CDT). We analyzed the uptake patterns of the inguinal lymph nodes, main lymphatic vessel and collateral lymphatic vessels, as well as dermal back flow. We compared these lymphoscintigraphic findings and other clinical variables between good and poor therapeutic responders using Pearson's Chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test and multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients (58.6%) had a poor therapeutic response to CDT. In univariate analysis, there were significant differences between good and poor responders in clinical stage (P < 0.001), therapy compliance (P < 0.001), main lymphatic vessel uptake pattern (P < 0.01), collateral lymphatic vessel uptake pattern (P < 0.01) and severity of dermal back flow (P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, only severity of dermal back flow (P < 0.005), clinical stage (P < 0.05) and therapy compliance (P < 0.001) were found to be independent predictors of therapeutic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoscintigraphy may be useful to predict the outcome of patients with gynecological cancer-related lymphedema undergoing CDT along with clinical stage and compliance.

Reliability of a radiological grading system for dermal backflow in lymphoscintigraphy imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Lymphoscintigraphy may be used for diagnosing secondary lymphedema. Dermal backflow, the presence of radiotracer in dermal lymphatics, is a key clinical feature. Although often reported as present or absent, a scale that assesses the severity of dermal backflow has been previously developed. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of these two methods of assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen experienced nuclear medicine physicians assessed the quantity of dermal backflow of 57 lymphoscintigraphy scans using a 4-point descriptive scale that was dichotomized for secondary analysis. Each scan included images from four time points for women previously diagnosed with secondary lymphedema (n = 47) and controls (n = 5); five scans were presented twice to examine intraobserver reliability. This was further investigated as 13 physicians viewed the scans again on an Apple iPad2. The physicians rated their confidence in their scoring. Readers were blinded to clinical history.

RESULTS

Although both the 2- and 4-point scale had moderate interobserver reliability, the reliability of the 2-point scale was slightly higher (4-point: Fleiss κ = .418, standard error [SE] = .008); 2-point: Fleiss κ = .574, SE = .013). Low interobserver reliability was found when only control subjects were considered (Fleiss κ = 0.055, SE = 0.034). Intraobserver reliability of the five repeated images varied from poor to perfect (Cohen κ = .063 to 1.00), whereas moderate to substantial intraobserver reliability (Cohen's κ = .342 to .752) was found when comparing devices. The readers were highly confident of their scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, moderate intraobserver and interobserver reliability was found for quantifying dermal backflow with both the 2- and 4-point scale.

Comparison of lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green lymphography for the diagnosis of extremity lymphoedema

BACKGROUND

Lymphoscintigraphy is the gold-standard examination for extremity lymphoedema. Indocyanine green lymphography may be useful for diagnosis as well. We compared the utility of these two examination methods for patients with suspected extremity lymphoedema and for those in whom surgical treatment of lymphoedema was under consideration.

METHODS

A total of 169 extremities with lymphoedema secondary to lymph node dissection and 65 extremities with idiopathic oedema (suspected primary lymphoedema) were evaluated; the utility of indocyanine green lymphography for diagnosis was compared with lymphoscintigraphy. Regression analysis between lymphoscintigraphy type and indocyanine green lymphography stage was conducted in the secondary lymphoedema group.

RESULTS

In secondary oedema, the sensitivity of indocyanine green lymphography, compared with lymphoscintigraphy, was 0.972, the specificity was 0.548 and the accuracy was 0.816. When patients with lymphoscintigraphy type I and indocyanine green lymphography stage I were regarded as negative, the sensitivity of the indocyanine green lymphography was 0.978, the specificity was 0.925 and the accuracy was 0.953. There was a significant positive correlation between the lymphoscintigraphy type and the indocyanine green lymphography stage. In idiopathic oedema, the sensitivity of indocyanine green lymphography was 0.974, the specificity was 0.778 and the accuracy was 0.892.

CONCLUSION

In secondary lymphoedema, earlier and less severe dysfunction could be detected by indocyanine green lymphography. Indocyanine green lymphography is recommended to determine patients' suitability for lymphaticovenular anastomosis, because the diagnostic ability of the test and its evaluation capability for disease severity is similar to lymphoscintigraphy but with less invasiveness and a lower cost. To detect primary lymphoedema, indocyanine green lymphography should be used first as a screening examination; when the results are positive, lymphoscintigraphy is useful to obtain further information.

Lymphoscintigraphy for differential diagnosis of peripheral edema: diagnostic yield of different scintigraphic patterns

Edema of the limbs is a common reason for medical consultation, for which the lymphoscintigraphy is considered to be a reliable method for its differential diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of radionuclide studies in the differential diagnosis of edema, and the diagnostic yield of different scintigraphic patterns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 61 patients, mean age 43 years, referred to our Department in the last three years for suspected lymphoedema, were considered. One patient was discarded due to lack of diagnosis, 56 had lower limb edema and 4 upper limb edema. After intradermal injection of two doses of (99m)Tc-nanocolloid, scintigraphic scans were made at 30 and 120minutes. The final diagnosis was based on imaging tests, clinical course, and response to treatment. We calculated the parameters of the diagnostic yield of four different scintigraphic patterns (presence of dermal backflow, asymmetry-alteration in inguinal/axillary nodes, presence of collateral pathways, and visualization of intermediate lymph nodes), considering them individually and jointly.

RESULTS

The best diagnostic yield was achieved by considering dermal backflow and asymmetry in inguinal/axillary nodes (accuracy 88.9%, specificity 96.4%, PPV 95.5%). Evaluation of intermediate lymph nodes and presence of collateral pathways contributed little to the diagnostic yield, showing poor sensitivity and high false positive rates.

CONCLUSION

The lymphoscintigraphy had high diagnostic yield, allowing early treatment of lymphœdema. The dermal backflow and asymmetry in inguinal/axillary nodes had the greatest diagnostic accuracy. Evaluation of intermediate lymph nodes and visualization of collateral pathways contributed little to improving the diagnosis.

Would complex decongestive therapy reveal long term effect and lymphoscintigraphy predict the outcome of lower-limb lymphedema related to gynecologic cancer treatment?

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to investigate the long-term effect of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) on lymphedema volume reduction, especially considering the proximal and distal parts of the leg, and to evaluate the utility of pre-therapy lymphoscintigraphy in predicting the response to CDT in patients with lower-limb lymphedema after surgery for gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

Medical records of 158 patients with secondary lymphedema of unilateral leg after surgery for gynecological cancer were reviewed retrospectively. They were treated with two weeks of CDT along with self-administered home therapy and were followed up for 24 months. Whole, proximal and distal leg volume was serially measured by using an optoelectric volumeter prior to and immediately after therapy, and follow-up visits at months 3, 6, 12 and 24. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed prior to therapy.

RESULTS

The percent volume reduction was 22.1% in the whole leg, 30.9% in the distal leg and 18.4% in the proximal leg immediately after CDT. The volume reduction was maintained for 24 months, but the distal leg was significantly well maintained better than the proximal leg. Extremity radioisotope uptake ratio (EUR) among lymphoscintigraphic findings could predict the improvement of lymphedema volume in the distal, proximal and whole leg.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that the long-term edema reducing effects of CDT are better maintained in the distal leg than in the proximal part, and initial lymphoscintigraphic quantitative finding may usefully predict the short and long-term response to CDT.

Recent advances in medical treatment for lymphedema

As medical treatment for lymphedema, combined physical therapy with guidance regarding daily living is recommended. Recently, training has been conducted on a nationwide scale, and this therapy has gradually and commonly been employed. This therapy consists of daily living guidance to prevent edema deterioration, skin care, manual lymph drainage, compression therapy, and exercise therapy. The number of hospitals in which all procedures can be adequately performed is limited. There is no treatment to completely cure lymphedema. Patients' self-care based on the contents of treatment is essential for relieving symptoms. (English Translation of J Jpn Col Angiol 2008; 48: 167-172.).