Comparison of two gentamicin dosing schedules in very low birth weight infants

Neonatal sepsis: a systematic review of core outcomes from randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The lack of a consensus definition of neonatal sepsis and a core outcome set (COS) proves a substantial impediment to research that influences policy and practice relevant to key stakeholders, patients and parents.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. In the included studies, the described outcomes were extracted in accordance with the provisions of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) handbook and registered.

RESULTS

Among 884 abstracts identified, 90 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. Only 30 manuscripts explicitly stated the primary and/or secondary outcomes. A total of 88 distinct outcomes were recorded across all 90 studies included. These were then assigned to seven different domains in line with the taxonomy for classification proposed by the COMET initiative. The most frequently reported outcome was survival with 74% (n = 67) of the studies reporting an outcome within this domain.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review constitutes one of the initial phases in the protocol for developing a COS in neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting in neonatal sepsis hinders comparison and synthesis of data. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to generate a COS in neonatal sepsis by consensus recommendation.

IMPACT

This systematic review identified a wide variation of outcomes reported among published RCTs on the management of neonatal sepsis. The paucity of standardised outcome reporting hinders comparison and synthesis of data and future meta-analyses with conclusive recommendations on the management of neonatal sepsis are unlikely. The final phase will involve a Delphi Survey to determine a COS by consensus recommendation with input from all relevant stakeholders.

Antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis

BACKGROUND

Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality globally constituting 13% of overall neonatal mortality. Despite the high burden of neonatal sepsis, high-quality evidence in diagnosis and treatment is scarce. Possibly due to the diagnostic challenges of sepsis and the relative immunosuppression of the newborn, many neonates receive antibiotics for suspected sepsis. Antibiotics have become the most used therapeutics in neonatal intensive care units. The last Cochrane Review was updated in 2004. Given the clinical importance, an updated systematic review assessing the effects of different antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL (2020, Issue 8); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase Ovid; CINAHL; LILACS; Science Citation Index EXPANDED and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science on 12 March 2021. We searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing different antibiotic regimens for early-onset neonatal sepsis. We included participants from birth to 72 hours of life at randomisation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and our secondary outcomes were: serious adverse events, respiratory support, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, necrotising enterocolitis, and ototoxicity. Our primary time point of interest was at maximum follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five RCTs (865 participants). All trials were at high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence according to GRADE was very low. The included trials assessed five different comparisons of antibiotics. We did not conduct any meta-analyses due to lack of relevant data. Of the five included trials one trial compared ampicillin plus gentamicin with benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin; one trial compared piperacillin plus tazobactam with amikacin; one trial compared ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid with piperacillin plus gentamicin; one trial compared piperacillin with ampicillin plus amikacin; and one trial compared ceftazidime with benzylpenicillin plus gentamicin. None of the five comparisons found any evidence of a difference when assessing all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, or necrotising enterocolitis; however, none of the trials were near an information size that could contribute significantly to the evidence of the comparative benefits and risks of any particular antibiotic regimen. None of the trials assessed respiratory support or ototoxicity. The benefits and harms of different antibiotic regimens remain unclear due to the lack of well-powered trials and the high risk of systematic errors.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence is insufficient to support any antibiotic regimen being superior to another. Large RCTs assessing different antibiotic regimens in early-onset neonatal sepsis with low risk of bias are warranted.

Extended-interval Dosing of Gentamicin in Premature Neonates Born at <32 Weeks' Gestation and >7 Days of age

PURPOSE

Extended-interval dosing (EID) regimens of gentamicin have been validated for treating confirmed or suspected early- and late-onset sepsis in preterm infants in the first week of life. Despite the marked changes in volume of distribution and renal clearance in preterm infants after the first few days of life, few studies have validated EID regimens of gentamicin in this population. The objective of the study was to evaluate an EID regimen of gentamicin in infants born at <32 weeks' gestational age and aged >7 days.

METHODS

This observational study of an EID regimen was conducted in 39 infants. Dosing interval was based on the serum drug concentration at 22 hours after the administration of the first dose of 5 mg/kg. Gentamicin peak (5-12 µg/mL) and trough (<2 µg/mL) levels were compared to those in a historical control group of 39 infants who received traditional-interval dosing (TID) of 2.5 mg/kg of gentamicin with dosing intervals of 8, 12, or 24 hours.

FINDINGS

There were no differences in birthweight, gestational age at birth, postmenstrual age, weight at the start of gentamicin administration, postnatal age, small for gestational age status, antenatal corticosteroid use, or postnatal indomethacin exposure between the 2 groups. In the EID group, dosing intervals were 24 hours in 30 infants, 36 hours in 6 infants, and 48 hours in 3 infants. Compared with the TID group (n = 39), the EID group had a significantly higher peak level (median, 9.0 vs 4.7 µg/mL) and a significantly lower trough level (median, 0.7 vs 1.1 µg/mL) (both, P < 0.001). On regression analysis, the postmenstrual age was correlated significantly with trough levels in the EID group. There was no adverse effect on renal function in either group. On follow-up, 1 infant in the EID group and 2 infants in the TID group had evidence of sensorineural hearing loss.

IMPLICATIONS

In infants born at <32 weeks' gestation and >7 days of age, an EID gentamicin regimen, with a dosing interval based on a single concentration measurement at 22 hours after the administration of the first dose, achieved therapeutic peak and trough levels and performed significantly better than did a TID regimen in reaching target peak and trough levels. Larger-scale trials are needed for assessing the clinical efficacy (treatment failure/success) of these regimens.

Evaluation of evidence for pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics-based dose optimization of antimicrobials for treating Gram-negative infections in neonates

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Neonates present a special subgroup of population in whom optimization of antimicrobial dosing can be particularly challenging. Gram-negative infections are common in neonates, and inpatient treatment along with critical care is needed for the management of these infections. Dosing recommendations are often extrapolated from evidence generated in older patient populations. This systematic review was done to identify the knowledge gaps in the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD)-based optimized dosing schedule for parenteral antimicrobials for Gram-negative neonatal infections.

METHODS

Relevant research questions were identified. An extensive electronic and manual search methodology was used. Potentially eligible articles were screened for eligibility. The relevant data were extracted independently in a pre-specified data extraction form. Pooling of data was planned.

RESULTS

Of the 340 records screened, 24 studies were included for data extraction and incorporation in the review [carbapenems - imipenem and meropenem (n=7); aminoglycosides - amikacin and gentamicin (n=9); piperacillin-tazobactam (n=2); quinolones (n=2); third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (n=4) and colistin nil]. For each of the drug categories, the information for all the questions that the review sought to answer was incomplete. There was a wide variability in the covariates assessed, and pooling of results could not be undertaken.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide knowledge gap for determining the doses of antimicrobials used for Gram-negative infections in neonates. A different profile of newborns in the developing countries could affect the disposition of antimicrobials for Gram negative infections, necessitating the generation of PK-PD data of antimicrobials in neonates from developing countries. Further, guidelines for treatment of neonatal conditions may incorporate the evidence-based PK-PD-guided dosing regimens.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Animal studies and trials in older children and adults suggest that a 'one dose per day' regimen of gentamicin is superior to a 'multiple doses per day' regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 3) in the Cochrane Library (searched 8 April 2016), MEDLINE (1966 to 8 April 2016), Embase (1980 to 8 April 2016), and CINAHL (December 1982 to 8 April 2016).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ('once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ('multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis was performed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven RCTs were included (N = 574) and 28 excluded. All except one study enrolled infants of more than 32 weeks' gestation. Limited information suggested that infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimens showed adequate clearance of sepsis (typical RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.19; typical RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.19; 3 trials; N = 37). 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen was associated with fewer failures to attain peak level of at least 5 µg/ml (typical RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.47; typical RD -0.13, 95% CI -0.19 to -0.08; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) = 8; 9 trials; N = 422); and fewer failures to achieve trough levels of 2 µg/ml or less (typical RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.55; typical RD -0.22, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.15; NNTB = 4; 11 trials; N = 503). 'Once a day' gentamicin achieved higher peak levels (MD 2.58, 95% CI 2.26 to 2.89; 10 trials; N = 440) and lower trough levels (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.44; 10 trials; N = 440) than 'multiple doses a day' regimen. There was no significant difference in ototoxicity between two groups (typical RR 1.69, 95% CI 0.18 to 16.25; typical RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.05; 5 trials; N = 214). Nephrotoxicity was not noted with either of the treatment regimens. Overall, the quality of evidence was considered to be moderate on GRADE analysis, given the small sample size and unclear/high risk of bias in some of the domains in a few of the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether a 'once a day' or a 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However, data suggest that pharmacokinetic properties of a 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to a 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There was no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on the assessment of pharmacokinetics, a 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating sepsis in neonates of more than 32 weeks' gestation.

Extended-interval gentamicin administration in neonates: a simplified approach

OBJECTIVE

Gentamicin dosing is highly variable and remains complicated in the neonatal population. Traditional dosing in our unit resulted in an excessive number of elevated trough serum gentamicin levels. We hypothesized that one uniform gentamicin dose for neonates of all gestational ages will reduce the incidence of elevated trough levels from 50 to 10%.

STUDY DESIGN

Our prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled eligible neonates into two groups, according to gestational age (⩽34 6/7 (group I) and >35 0/7 weeks (group II)). Patients in the study arm received a dose of gentamicin 5 mg kg(-1) intravenous (i.v.) every 36 h, whereas patients in the control arm received traditional dosage. Patients were monitored for resolution of infection, serum gentamicin levels and adverse effects. We confirmed our findings in a follow-up study. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 96 neonates, 50 in group I (n=25 per arm) and 46 in group II (n=23 per arm). Elevated trough levels were reduced by 66% in group I (P=0.61) and 100% in group II (P=0.0015). In the study arm of both groups, 48/49 neonates had Cmin serum gentamicin concentration (SGC) <2 mg l(-1) and the majority had a trough SGC <1 mg l(-1) (P<0.0001). The study dose resulted in maximum gentamicin levels in the goal range and a 50% reduction in dosage modifications. There were no treatment failures or adverse effects. Our follow-up study phase confirmed these results.

CONCLUSION

A standardized gentamicin dosage of 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 36 h to neonates of all gestational ages was safe and resulted in SGCs in goal therapeutic ranges. The implications of this simplified gentamicin dosage are to reduce health-care costs by less frequent dosing of gentamicin and reducing medication errors in physician prescribing from complicated dosing schemes.

Development and Evaluation of a Gentamicin Pharmacokinetic Model That Facilitates Opportunistic Gentamicin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neonates and Infants

Trough gentamicin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is time-consuming, disruptive to neonatal clinical care, and a patient safety issue. Bayesian models could allow TDM to be performed opportunistically at the time of routine blood tests. This study aimed to develop and prospectively evaluate a new gentamicin model and a novel Bayesian computer tool (neoGent) for TDM use in neonatal intensive care. We also evaluated model performance for predicting peak concentrations and the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 h to time t h (AUC0- t). A pharmacokinetic meta-analysis was performed on pooled data from three studies (1,325 concentrations from 205 patients). A 3-compartment model was used with the following covariates: allometric weight scaling, postmenstrual and postnatal age, and serum creatinine concentration. Final parameter estimates (standard errors) were as follows: clearance, 6.2 (0.3) liters/h/70 kg of body weight; central volume (V), 26.5 (0.6) liters/70 kg; intercompartmental disposition (Q), 2.2 (0.3) liters/h/70 kg; peripheral volume V2, 21.2 (1.5) liters/70 kg; intercompartmental disposition (Q2), 0.3 (0.05) liters/h/70 kg; peripheral volume V3, 148 (52.0) liters/70 kg. The model's ability to predict trough concentrations from an opportunistic sample was evaluated in a prospective observational cohort study that included data from 163 patients and 483 concentrations collected in five hospitals. Unbiased trough predictions were obtained; the median (95% confidence interval [CI]) prediction error was 0.0004 (-1.07, 0.84) mg/liter. Results also showed that peaks and AUC0- t values could be predicted (from one randomly selected sample) with little bias but relative imprecision, with median (95% CI) prediction errors being 0.16 (-4.76, 5.01) mg/liter and 10.8 (-24.9, 62.2) mg · h/liter, respectively. neoGent was implemented in R/NONMEM and in the freely available TDMx software.

Risk of gentamicin toxicity in neonates treated for possible severe bacterial infection in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk of gentamicin toxicity and potential number of neonates exposed annually to this risk, through treatment with WHO-recommended first-line antibiotics (gentamicin with penicillin) for the 6.9 million neonates with possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI).

METHODS

Systematic literature review and assessment of the evidence using Cochrane and GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was undertaken for pooled estimates where appropriate.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (946 neonates) were included (nine randomised controlled trials and two prospective cohort studies). Six trials reported consistently measured ototoxicity outcomes in neonates treated with gentamicin, and the pooled estimate for hearing loss was 3% (95% CI 0-7%). Nephrotoxicity could not be assessed due to variation in case definitions used. Estimates of the number of neonates potentially affected by gentamicin toxicity were not undertaken due to insufficient data.

CONCLUSION

Given wider scale-up of outpatient-based and lower-level treatment of PSBI, improved data are essential to better assess the risks from neonatal gentamicin treatment without assessment of blood levels, to maximise benefit and reduce harm.

Aminoglycoside toxicity in neonates: something to worry about?

Toxicity has limited the use of aminoglycosides and adult studies report high rates of both ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Conversely paediatric studies have shown lower rates and extended interval dosing may have reduced toxicity further. We review the animal and human evidence for aminoglycoside toxicity in neonates including mechanisms, measurement and rates of toxicity; and differences between aminoglycosides and dosing regimens. We discuss genetic susceptibility and the impact of other synergistic effects.

Every 36-h gentamicin dosing in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy receiving hypothermia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of a change in the empiric gentamicin dose from 5 mg kg(-1) every 24 h (Q24 h period) to 5 mg kg every 36 h (Q36 h period) on target drug concentration achievement in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving therapeutic hypothermia.

STUDY DESIGN

Gentamicin drug concentrations in neonates with HIE receiving therapeutic hypothermia were examined during two time periods in a retrospective chart review. During the initial treatment period (November 2007 to March 2010; n=29), neonates received Q24 h period. During the second treatment period (January 2011 to May 2012; n=23), the dose was changed to Q36 h period. Cooling criteria and protocol remained the same between treatment periods. Gentamicin drug concentrations including achievement of target trough concentrations (<2 mg l(-1)) were compared between treatment periods. Individual Bayesian estimates of gentamicin clearance were also compared.

RESULT

Neonates with an elevated trough concentration >2 mg l(-1) decreased from 38 to 4% with implementation of a Q36-h dosing interval (P<0.007). The mean gentamicin trough concentration was 2.0 ± 0.8 mg l(-1) during the Q24 h period and 0.9 ± 0.4 mg l(-1) during the Q36 h period (P<0.001). Peak concentrations were minimally impacted (Q24 h 11.4 ± 2.3 mg l(-1) vs Q36 h 10.0 ± 1.9 mg l(-1); P=0.05). The change in gentamicin trough concentration could not be accounted for by differences in gentamicin clearance between treatment periods (P=0.9).

CONCLUSION

A 5 mg kg(-1) every 36-h gentamicin dosing strategy in neonates with HIE receiving therapeutic hypothermia improved achievement of target trough concentration <2 mg l(-1), while still providing high peak concentration exposure.

Gentamicin pharmacokinetics and dosing in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy receiving hypothermia

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) receiving hypothermia and to identify an empiric gentamicin dosing strategy in this population that optimizes achievement of target peak and trough concentrations.

DESIGN

Population pharmacokinetic study using retrospective medical record data.

SETTING

Tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

A total of 29 full-term neonates diagnosed with HIE treated with hypothermia who received gentamicin and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Patient demographics and gentamicin concentration data were retrospectively collected over a 2-year period. A population-based pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM). Using the developed model, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of achieving target peak (> 6 mg/L) and trough (< 2 mg/L) gentamicin concentrations for various potential dosing regimens. A one-compartment model best described the available gentamicin concentration data. Birthweight and serum creatinine significantly influenced gentamicin clearance. For the typical study neonate (birthweight 3.3 kg, serum creatinine 0.9 mg/dl), clearance was 0.034 L/hour/kg and volume was 0.52 L/kg. At a 24-hour dosing interval, Monte Carlo simulations predicted target gentamicin peak and trough concentrations could not be reliably achieved at any dose. At a 36-hour dosing interval, a dose of 4-5 mg/kg is predicted to achieve target gentamicin peak and trough concentrations in more than 90% of neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin clearance is decreased in neonates with HIE treated with hypothermia compared with previous reports in nonasphyxiated normothermic full-term neonates. A prolonged 36-hour dosing interval will be needed to achieve target gentamicin trough concentrations in this population. Further prospective evaluation of this dosing recommendation is needed.

Extended interval dosing of gentamicin in premature neonates ≤ 28-week gestation

AIM

To evaluate an extended interval dosing (EID) regimen of gentamicin in neonates ≤28-week gestation.

METHODS

In 2008, an EID regimen for gentamicin was introduced for all neonates admitted to the NICU in Calgary. The dosing interval was based on a 22 h level after the first dose of 5mg/kg. We conducted an observational study in 33 infants ≤28-week gestation on the EID regimen from the first day of life and compared gentamicin peak and trough levels with a historical control of 34 infants who received gentamicin in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 24 h (TID, traditional interval dosing).

RESULTS

In the EID group, based on the 22 h level, dosing interval was 36 h in 20 neonates and 48 h in 13 neonates. All neonates, except one, achieved therapeutic peak and trough levels. Compared to the TID group, the EID group had higher peak levels (median 9.8 μg/mL vs. 4.6 μg/mL, p < 0.001) with no difference in trough levels. With target peak levels of 5-12 μg/mL and trough levels of <2 μg/mL, a higher proportion of neonates in the TID group would need dose adjustment.

CONCLUSION

In neonates ≤ 28-week gestation, an EID regimen from day one of life, using a single level 22 h after the first dose for dosing interval, achieves therapeutic peak and trough levels and more optimum peak levels as compared to a TID regimen.

Optimum Use of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics in the NICU

Therapeutic drug monitoring is increasingly giving way to dosing drugs based on population-based pharmacokinetic parameters, even when pharmacokinetic values vary quite a bit in individual patients. Further, drug concentrations are often considered appropriate if they are within a defined therapeutic range, even if the patient response is suboptimal. This lecture discusses the limitations of therapeutic ranges in neonates, and proposes greater emphasis on pharmacodynamic curves to individualize drug therapy. Examples are provided using methylxanthines, indomethacin, antiepileptic drugs and aminoglycosides. The potential to use pharmacokinetic findings to describe physiologic changes and occasionally assist with diagnosis is also discussed.

Validation of a dosage individualization table for extended-interval gentamicin in neonates

BACKGROUND

Extended-interval aminoglycoside dosing is increasingly used in neonates; however, guidance on how to monitor concentrations and adjust dosages accordingly is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively validate the use of a 22-hour gentamicin concentration dosing table for the individualization of extended-interval dosing in the neonatal population by examining the peak and trough concentrations achieved through its use.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out on gentamicin concentrations achieved using a 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentration dosing table for determining dosing intervals in neonates. Neonates (N = 104) in the first week of life, gestational age 23 weeks to full term, in level II and III neonatal intensive care units were included. Neonates were given gentamicin 5 mg/kg intravenously; a table using 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentrations was then used to individualize dosing intervals. Pre- and post-serum gentamicin concentrations on the dosing interval indicated were measured with the second or third doses and used to calculate the peak and trough concentrations achieved.

RESULTS

Use of the 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentration dosing table resulted in dosing intervals that provided appropriate peak (mean 10.55 mg/L) and trough (mean 0.75 mg/L) concentrations (with second or third doses) in all neonates. All patients had trough concentrations less than 2 mg/L, and 73% had a trough concentration less than 1 mg/L. No peak concentrations were less than 5 mg/L, 82% of patients had a peak concentration from 5 to 12 mg/L, and the remaining 18% had concentrations from 12.1 to 16 mg/L. Peak and trough concentrations were similar across all gestational ages.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a 22-hour post-first-dose gentamicin concentration dosing table to individualize extended-interval gentamicin dosages in neonates resulted in appropriate peak and trough concentrations in all neonates studied. Use of this table will result in appropriate extended-interval aminoglycoside dosages in neonates early in treatment, using a single serum concentration.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Animal studies and trials in older children and adults suggest that a one dose per day regimen of gentamicin is superior to a multiple doses per day regimen.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, April 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2011), EMBASE 1980 to April 2011, and CINAHL (December 1982 to April 2011). Abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research were searched from 1980 to 2010 inclusive.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ( 'once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ( 'multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants < 28 days of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection and analysis was performed according to the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven studies were included (N = 574) and nineteen excluded. All infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimen showed adequate clearance of sepsis [typical RD 0.00 (95% CI - 0.19 to 0.19); 3 trials; N = 36]. For the other primary outcome measures relating to gentamicin pharmacokinetics 'once a day' dosing of gentamicin was superior. 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen was associated with less failures to attain peak level of at least 5 µg/ml [typical RR 0.22 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.47); 9 trials; N = 422] and less failures to achieve trough levels of < 2 µg/ml [typical RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.55); 11 trials N = 503] compared to 'multiple doses a day' regimen.Ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity were not noted with either of the treatment regimens.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether 'once a day' or 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However, data suggests that pharmacokinetic properties of 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There is no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on this assessment of pharmacokinetics, 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating neonatal sepsis in neonates greater than 32 weeks gestation.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Penicillins, Cephalosporins and Aminoglycosides in the Neonate: A Review

Bacterial infections are common in the neonates and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Sixty percent of preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units received at least one antibiotic during the first week of life. Penicillins, aminoglycosides and cephalosporins comprised 53, 43 and 16%, respectively. Kinetic parameters such as the half-life (t1/2), clearance (Cl), and volume of distribution (Vd) change with development, so the kinetics of penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides need to be studied in order to optimise therapy with these drugs. The aim of this study is to review the pharmacokinetics of penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides in the neonate in a single article in order to provide a critical analysis of the literature and thus provide a useful tool in the hands of physicians. The bibliographic search was performed electronically using PubMed, as the search engine, until February 2nd, 2010. Medline search terms were as follows: pharmacokinetics AND (penicillins OR cephalosporins OR aminoglycosides) AND infant, newborn, limiting to humans. Penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides are fairly water soluble and are mainly eliminated by the kidneys. The maturation of the kidneys governs the pharmacokinetics of penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides in the neonate. The renal excretory function is reduced in preterms compared to term infants and Cl of these drugs is reduced in premature infants. Gestational and postnatal ages are important factors in the maturation of the neonate and, as these ages proceed, Cl of penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides increases. Cl and t1/2 are influenced by development and this must be taken into consideration when planning a dosage regimen with these drugs. More pharmacokinetic studies are required to ensure that the dose recommended for the treatment of sepsis in the neonate is evidence based.

Pharmacokinetic outcomes of a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol in critically ill neonates

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetic outcomes of a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol for critically ill neonates.

DESIGN

Retrospective medical record review with pharmacokinetic analysis.

SETTING

Two neonatal intensive care units in a pediatric tertiary care system.

PATIENTS

Sequential sample of 644 critically ill neonates less than 7 days old without evidence of renal dysfunction who received gentamicin, dosed by using a simplified, weight-based, extended-interval dosing protocol, on the first day of life for suspected sepsis between February 2003 and January 2008, and who had subsequent gentamicin plasma concentrations measured during their first week of life.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were collected on birth weight, gestational age at birth, serum creatinine concentration during the first 10 days of life, medical conditions, and concomitant drugs. Gentamicin dosing and its pharmacokinetic parameters were noted for each patient. A mean dose of 3.96 mg/kg/dose of gentamicin was administered intravenously every 48 hours in neonates weighing less than 1250 g at birth and every 24 hours in those weighing 1250 g or more. If the neonate received concurrent indomethacin, however, gentamicin was given every 48 hours. Protocol success was defined as a peak gentamicin plasma concentration of 7-10 mg/L and a trough concentration less than 2 mg/L. Mean gentamicin peak and trough concentrations were 9.38 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.24-9.52 mg/L) and 1.00 mg/L (95% CI 0.96-1.04 mg/L), respectively. With use of the protocol, 361 neonates (56.1%) achieved gentamicin peak plasma concentrations in the range defined as successful and 610 neonates (94.7%) achieved successful trough concentrations. The mean gentamicin apparent volume of distribution and half-life were 0.48 L/kg (95% CI 0.47-0.49 L/kg) and 8.31 hours (95% CI 8.09-8.52 hrs), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This simplified, weight-based, extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocol for critically ill neonates was effective in achieving therapeutic peak plasma concentrations of gentamicin in most of the patients and, as a high proportion of patients had acceptable trough concentrations, may minimize the potential for toxicity.

[Comparison of two gentamicin dosing schedules in the newborn]

INTRODUCTION

Gentamicin is widely used in full-term neonates as empirical therapy for early-onset suspected or proven sepsis. Several dosing schedules for gentamicin have been recommended for this neonatal population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare gentamicin serum levels, efficacy and toxicity of two dosing schedules in term and preterm newborns.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 200 newborns who were started on gentamicin therapy. Group A (N=100) was prescribed a multiple-daily dosing regimen and Group B (N=100) on a once-daily dosing regimen. Newborns in Group A received gentamicin at 2.5-3.5 mg/kg/dose q12-18 h depending on postnatal age and serum creatinine levels, and newborns in Group B received 4-5 mg/kg/dose q24-48 h depending on postconceptional and postnatal age. All peak and trough serum drug levels, demographic data, and markers of potential nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity were compared.

RESULTS

Peak serum gentamicin levels were significantly higher (8.2+/-0.22 microg/ml vs. 5.9+/-0.13 microg/ml; p <or= 0.001) and trough levels were significantly lower (0.9+/-0.06 microg/ml vs. 1.7+/-0.08 microg/ml; p <or= 0.001) in Group B than in Group A. There was no significant difference between the groups either in the clinical failure rate or in the nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily dosing regimen of gentamicin in preterm and term newborns is safe and effective, with a reduced risk of serum drug concentrations falling outside the therapeutic range.

Observational trial of a 48-hour gentamicin dosing regimen derived from Monte Carlo simulations in infants born at less than 28 weeks' gestation

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a 48-hour gentamicin dosing regimen for infants born at <28 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

Using previously published pharmacokinetic data, we performed Monte Carlo simulations for several candidate gentamicin dosing regimens. On the basis of these simulations, we changed dosing for infants born at <28 weeks to 4.5 mg/kg every 48 hours. We then conducted an observational study of 30 infants on this new regimen and compared serum gentamicin levels with 60 historical control subjects who received 2.5 mg/kg every 24 hours.

RESULTS

Infants in the 48-hour group achieved higher gentamicin peaks (mean 9.43 microg/mL vs 6.0 microg/mL, P < .001) and lower gentamicin troughs (mean 1.08 microg/mL vs 1.54 microg/mL, P < .001) compared with the 24-hour group. Seven percent of the 48-hour group infants had a gentamicin peak <6 microg/mL versus 43% in the 24-hour group. With a goal for peaks of 6 to 12 microg/mL and for troughs of <1.5 microg/mL, infants in the 48-hour group required fewer adjustments of their dosing regimens compared with the 24-hour group (26.7% vs 78.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin given every 48 hours to infants born at <28 weeks achieves optimal blood concentrations more frequently than does once-daily dosing. Monte Carlo simulations on the basis of pharmacokinetic modeling are useful to optimize drug dosing in premature infants.

Two nomograms for determining extended-dosing intervals for gentamicin in neonates

PURPOSE

The development of two nomograms to predict dosing intervals for gentamicin in neonates based on one gentamicin concentration is described.

METHODS

Pooled data from three retrospective studies on neonates age seven days or younger were used to create nomograms that would predict dosing intervals for gentamicin. The population volume of distribution (0.45 L/kg) and a determined half-life were used to create nomogram cutoff concentrations that could select a dosing interval for neonates to achieve steady-state trough concentrations of < or =0.5 or < or =1 mg/L. A dose of 4 mg/kg was used to simulate concentration-versus-time profiles for included neonates based on their individual pharmacokinetic data. Predicted concentrations from hours 6 to 22, at one-hour intervals, for each neonate were compared against the nomograms and evaluated for the number of correct interval predictions. The nomograms were considered to have failed at any time point where they indicated an interval that would not have achieved the desired trough concentration of < or =0.5 or < or =1 mg/L or if the interval chosen was longer than necessary.

RESULTS

The 0.5- and 1-mg/L nomograms predicted correct dosing intervals for 81-92% of neonates for postinfusion hours between 15 to 21 and 86-93% for postinfusion hours of 13 and 21, respectively. Accuracy of the nomograms to predict correct dosing intervals improved as the postinfusion time before the next concentration measurement increased.

CONCLUSION

Using the two nomograms may help predict the correct extended-dosing intervals of gentamicin administration for neonates. Prospective evaluation and validation of the nomograms may be necessary for their wider use as a clinical tool.

Determination of extended-interval gentamicin dosing for neonatal patients in developing countries

BACKGROUND

Infectious diseases account for an estimated 36% of neonatal deaths globally. The purpose of this study was to determine safe, effective, simplified dosing regimens of gentamicin for treatment of neonatal sepsis in developing countries.

METHODS

Neonates with suspected sepsis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at Christian Medical College and Hospital (CMC), Vellore, India (n = 49), and Dhaka Shishu Hospital (DSH), Bangladesh (n = 59), were administered gentamicin intravenously according to the following regimens: (1) 10 mg every 48 hours for neonates <2000 g; (2) 10 mg every 24 hours for neonates 2000-2249 g; and (3) 13.5 mg every 24 hours for neonates > or =2500 g. Serum gentamicin concentration (SGC) at steady state and pharmacokinetic indices were determined. Renal function was followed while under treatment and hearing was examined 6 weeks to 3 months after discharge.

RESULTS

All neonates, except 1 weighing 2000-2249 g at DSH, had a peak SGC >4 microg/mL. Overall, 5 (10%) and 17 (29%) infants had a peak SGC level > or =12 microg/mL from CMC and DSH, respectively, and 10 (20%) and 4 (7%) cases from CMC and DSH, respectively, had a trough SGC level > or =2 microg/mL. However, no infant <2000 g had a trough SGC level > or =2 microg/mL. We found no evidence of gentamicin nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Safe, therapeutic gentamicin dosing regimens were identified for treatment of neonatal sepsis in developing country settings. Administration of these doses could be simplified through use of Uniject, a prefilled, single injection device designed to make injections safe and easy to deliver in developing country settings.

Pharmacokinetics of a netilmicin loading dose on the first postnatal day in preterm neonates with very w gestational age

OBJECTIVE

Pharmacokinetic parameters are important for dose adjustment of aminoglycosides, but they are highly variable in neonates. In this study the pharmacokinetics of a netilmicin loading dose was investigated on the first postnatal day in preterm neonates with very low gestational age (GA).

METHODS

In an open prospective study, 20 neonates with GA between 22.9 and 32.0 weeks and suspected postnatal bacterial infection received an intravenous loading dose of 5 mg/kg netilmicin over 1 h during the first postnatal day. Netilmicin serum concentrations were determined by an enzyme multiplied immunoassay.

RESULTS

The systemic clearance of netilmicin normalized to body weight (BW) was not significantly different in three GA subgroups (0.59+/- 0.02 ml/min/kg for GA <24 weeks, 0.72+/-0.14 ml/min/kg for GA 24-27 weeks, and 0.62+/-0.19 ml/min/kg for GA 27-32 weeks, P=0.123). Similar results were also obtained for serum elimination half-time and for the distribution volume normalized to BW. Multiple regression analysis showed that systemic clearance and volume of distribution (both not normalized to BW) significantly correlated with BW (P<0.0001) but not with GA. In the entire group, 20% of peak concentrations were below the target of 6 mg/l, and 63% of trough concentrations were above the target of 2 mg/l.

CONCLUSION

In neonates with very low GA, the pharmacokinetic parameters of netilmicin determined after an intravenous loading dose were not dependent on GA when normalized to BW. A number of neonates did not reach targeted peak and trough netilmicin serum concentrations, suggesting that a higher loading dose and a prolonged dosing interval might enhance the effectiveness and safety of netilmicin in preterm neonates immediately after birth.

One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates

BACKGROUND

Gentamicin is widely used in the treatment of suspected or proven neonatal sepsis. Animal studies and systematic reviews from trials in older children and adults suggest that a one dose per day regimen is superior to a multiple doses per day regimen. Pharmacokinetic studies and retrospective audits in neonatal population also favour once a day administration of gentamicin. However, there is no consensus regarding the dose interval regimen in the neonatal population.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of one dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin in suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible studies were identified by searching MEDLINE (March 2005), EMBASE 1980 - 2004, Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005) and CINAHL (December 1982 - March 2005). Abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research were hand searched from 1980 to 2004 inclusive. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised or quasi randomised controlled trials comparing one dose per day ( 'once a day') compared to multiple doses per day ( 'multiple doses a day') of gentamicin to newborn infants < 28 days of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed according to allocation concealment, blinding of intervention, blinding of outcome assessment and completeness of follow up. Data were sought regarding effects on clinical efficacy, pharmacokinetic efficacy, ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity of the two regimens. When appropriate, meta-analysis was conducted to provide a pooled estimate of effect. For categorical data, the typical relative risk (RR), typical risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Continuous data were analysed using weighted mean difference (WMD).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty four studies were initially identified. Thirteen were excluded and eleven studies (N = 574) included. All studies compared the effectiveness and safety of 'once a day' versus 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin in newborn infants. Only one study enrolled infants less than 32 weeks gestation. All except one trial used intravenous infusion. One trial used gentamicin as a bolus dose over one minute. Two trials used intramuscular gentamicin in some of their study infants. For the primary outcome of 'clearance of sepsis', all infants in both 'once a day' as well as 'multiple doses a day' regimen showed adequate clearance of sepsis [Typical RD 0.00 (95% CI - 0.19, 0.19); 3 trials; N = 36]. For the other primary outcome measures relating to gentamicin pharmacokinetics, 'once a day dosing' of gentamicin was superior. 'Once a day' gentamicin regimen is associated with less failures to attain peak level of at least 5 microg/ml [Typical RR 0.22 (95% CI 0.11, 0.47); Typical RD -0.13 (95% CI -0.19, -0.08); 9 trials; N = 422]; less failures to achieve trough levels of < 2 microg/ml [Typical RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.27, 0.55); Typical RD -0.22 (95% CI -0.29, -0.15); 11 trials N = 503]; higher peak levels [WMD 2.58 (95% CI 2.26, 2.89); 10 trials; N = 440] and lower trough levels [WMD -0.57 (95% CI -0.69, -0.44); 10 trials; N = 440] compared to 'multiple doses a day' regimen. Ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity were not noted with either of the treatment regimens. Significant heterogeneity was noted for some of the outcomes measured. Hence the results need to be interpreted with caution. Possible reasons for heterogeneity are different gestational ages of study infants and the timing of collection of blood samples in relation to a particular dose and the day of therapy on which the samples were collected.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from the currently available RCTs to conclude whether 'once a day' or 'multiple doses a day' regimen of gentamicin is superior in treating proven neonatal sepsis. However data suggests that pharmacokinetic properties of 'once a day' gentamicin regimen are superior to 'multiple doses a day' regimen in that it achieves higher peak levels while avoiding toxic trough levels. There is no change in nephrotoxicity or auditory toxicity. Based on this assessment of pharmacokinetics, 'once a day regimen' may be superior in treating neonatal sepsis in neonates more than 32 weeks gestation.

Gentamicin usage in newborns--a simple and practical regime

OBJECTIVE

To audit the gentamicin usage guidelines due to concerns that it resulted in too many sub-therapeutic peak levels, devise a new guideline and re-audit after change in practise.

METHOD

A prospective audit of 50 sets of gentamicin levels on the Old Gentamicin Regime was conducted. Desired levels were a trough <2 microg/ml and peak between 5-10 microg/ml. These were taken just before and one hour after the third dose respectively. Peak levels were found to be in the sub-therapeutic range in the majority on this regime. Therefore the New Gentamicin Regime was put into practise. A re-audit was conducted of the new gentamicin regime and 60 trough levels were taken. Peak levels were taken in only 20 newborns with the intention of not doing peak levels routinely if these were satisfactory and the data were analysed.

RESULTS

Although trough levels were satisfactory in 98% (49/50), peak levels were sub-therapeutic in 92% (46/50) on the old gentamicin regime. Following change in practise to the new gentamicin regime trough levels were satisfactory in 96.6% (58/60). We collected 20 peak levels and these were satisfactory in 80% (16/20).

CONCLUSIONS

The new gentamicin usage guideline achieves peak levels in the therapeutic range in the majority without any added risk of toxic trough levels. Peak levels need not be done routinely in all newborns on the new regime.

Prediction of gentamicin peak and trough concentrations from six extended-interval dosing protocols for neonates

PURPOSE

The ability of six extended-interval gentamicin dosing protocols to achieve desired peak and trough concentrations in neonates was evaluated using simulated calculations based on pooled patient data.

METHODS

The demographic and pharmacokinetic data of 293 neonates age one week or less from three previously published studies were pooled and applied in each of six published protocols. The data collected, including weight, dosage, dosing interval, and measured serum or plasma gentamicin concentrations, were used to determine gentamicin clearance, elimination-rate constant, and distribution volume. Peak and trough gentamicin concentrations were calculated and compared with several therapeutic ranges that aim to achieve high peak concentrations for maximum efficacy and low trough concentrations for minimum toxicity.

RESULTS

All protocols resulted in more than 95% of peak concentrations exceeding 5 mg/L. Peaks exceeded 10 mg/L in 26-42% of the simulations. Most of the protocols resulted in high trough concentrations (0.5-1.5 mg/L). Trough concentrations were below 1 mg/L in 51-83% of the simulations.

CONCLUSION

Simulated calculations based on pooled patient data found that six gentamicin dosing protocols for neonates would likely yield acceptable peak concentrations and a trough concentration of < or = 1 mg/L for at least 50% of patients. It may be sufficient to monitor only the trough concentrations when applying these protocols.

Phenotypic and genotypic aminoglycoside resistance in blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci from a single neonatal intensive care unit, 1989–2000

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance and genes encoding aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AME) in blood culture isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) from neonates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 180 isolates from 148 patients collected in a single neonatal unit over a 12 year period were examined for susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, amikacin and arbekacin by Etest and/or disc diffusion. AME genes were detected by PCR.

RESULTS

The overall non-susceptibility rates to gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, amikacin and arbekacin were 66%, 68%, 52%, 38% and 1%, respectively. Gentamicin non-susceptibility rates were 4% and 91% in methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates, respectively. aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia, aph(3')-IIIa and/or ant(4')-Ia were encountered in 125 (69%), 1 (0.5%) and 30 (16.6%) isolates, respectively. Forty-six (26%) isolates negative for AME genes were susceptible to all aminoglycosides. In contrast, 115 (92%), 91 (73%) and 66 (53%) of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia positive isolates were non-susceptible to gentamicin, netilmicin and amikacin, respectively. Only one isolate showed arbekacin resistance. However, aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia positive isolates and isolates with gentamicin MIC > or =128 mg/L displayed a significant reduction in arbekacin inhibition zones.

CONCLUSIONS

A high prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance was detected and associated with methicillin resistance. Discrepancies between phenotypic and genetic detection of aminoglycoside resistance were discerned. Gentamicin was the preferred substrate for phenotypic detection of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia. Arbekacin showed favourable antibacterial activity even in aac(6')-Ie-aph(2'')-Ia-positive isolates. We suggest including arbekacin in future clinical trials of empirical treatment of late onset neonatal sepsis.

Validation of a simplified netilmicin dosage regimen in infants

The aim of this study was to validate a simplified high-dosage, extended-interval netilmicin dosage regimen for infants. A total of 129 infants receiving 163 treatment courses of netilmicin (6 mg kg every 24 or 36 h depending on gestational age (GA), postnatal age and postmenstrual age) was analysed. Serum netilmicin concentrations were monitored before (Cmin), 30 min (C0.5h) after and 7.5 h (C7.5h) after the third dose. In 110 patients during first week of life mean C0.5h was 10.5 mg/l. Mean C0.5h was significantly lower (9.0 mg/l) in 38 infants older than 1 week of age. 14 of 15 patients with Cmin levels > or = 2 mg/l receiving netilmicin every 36 h were < 28 weeks of gestation. In the first week of life significant correlations between GA and elimination half-life (p < 0.001) and between plasma creatinine and elevated Cmin (p < 0.002) were found, but no correlation between C0.5h and GA. In this high-dosage regimen a dosing interval of 48 h for GA < 29 weeks, 36 h for GA 29-36 weeks and 24 h for full term babies seems appropriate, during first week of life, to avoid the majority of elevated trough levels and still obtain maximal therapeutic efficacy.

Pharmacodynamics and dosing of aminoglycosides

Aminoglycosides are concentration-dependent killing agents whose pharmacodynamic predictors of efficacy are the area-under-the-curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio and the peak to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio. Prospective studies have shown that these agents can be given once-daily or less frequently in most clinical settings, with equal efficacy and possible reduced toxicity. Dosages for different clinical settings have been studied and methods are available to monitor once-daily dosing.