The efficacy of antifibrinolytics in the reduction of blood loss during complex adult reconstructive spine surgery

Comparative efficacy and safety of different hemostatic medications during spinal surgery: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Significant blood loss is still one of the most frequent issues in spinal surgery. There were different hemostatic methods to prevent blood loss during spinal surgery. However, the optimal hemostatic therapy for spinal surgery is controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of different hemostatic therapies in spinal surgery.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers conducted electronic literature searches in 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library database) as well as a manual search to identify eligible clinical studies from inception to Nov 2022. Studies that including different hemostatic therapy (tranexamic acid [TXA], epsilon-acetyl aminocaproic acid [EACA], and aprotinin [AP]) for spinal surgery were included. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was performed to determine the ranking order. All analyses were performed by R software and Stata software. P value less than .05 was identified as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Finally, a total of 34 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and finally included in this network meta-analysis. The SUCRA shows that TXA ranked first (SUCRA, 88.4%), AP ranked second (SUCRA, 71.6%), EACA ranked third (SUCRA, 39.9%), and placebo ranked the last (SUCRA, 0.3%) as for total blood loss. The SUCRA shows that TXA ranked first (SUCRA, 97.7%), AP ranked second (SUCRA, 55.8%), EACA ranked third (SUCRA, 46.2%), and placebo ranked the last (SUCRA, 0.2%) for need for transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

TXA appears optimal in the reduction of perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion during spinal surgery. However, considering the limitations in this study, more large-scale, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Hemostats in Spine Surgery: Literature Review and Expert Panel Recommendations

Bleeding in spine surgery is a common occurrence but when bleeding is uncontrolled the consequences can be severe due to the potential for spinal cord compression and damage to the central nervous system. There are many factors that influence bleeding during spine surgery including patient factors and those related to the type of surgery and the surgical approach to bleeding. There are a range of methods that can be employed to both reduce the risk of bleeding and achieve hemostasis, one of which is the adjunct use of hemostatic agents. Hemostatic agents are available in a variety of forms and materials and with considerable variation in cost, but specific evidence to support their use in spine surgery is sparse. A literature review was conducted to identify the pre-, peri-, and postsurgical considerations around bleeding in spine surgery. The review generated a set of recommendations that were discussed and ratified by a wider expert group of spine surgeons. The results are intended to provide a practical guide to the selection of hemostats for specific bleeding situations that may be encountered in spine surgery.

The Efficiency of Simultaneous Systemic and Topical Use of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Fusion Surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIM

 Multilevel posterior spinal fusion surgery in adults is associated with significant intra- and postoperative blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic agent for reducing blood loss and allogenic blood transfusion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of TXA in reducing blood loss and improving hematologic parameters in adult patients undergoing posterior thoracic/lumbar instrumented spinal fusion surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 This is a retrospective observational study comparing the intra- and postoperative hemodynamic findings of two groups treated with and without TXA. The study included 112 adult patients receiving elective posterior thoracic/lumbar instrumented spinal fusion surgery. The patients were evaluated in terms of age, gender, type of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit values, postoperative systemic anticoagulant use, intra- and postoperative use of blood products, and the volume of the drainage fluid as an indicator of postoperative blood loss. The TXA group received preoperative 10 mg/kg intravenous TXA, another dose of 10 mg/kg/h in isotonic solution during the operation, and local administration of TXA before the closure of the surgical site (1g in patients undergoing surgery in ≤3 segments, and 2g in patients undergoing surgery in ≥4 segment group).

RESULTS

 Intra- and postoperative blood loss and need for transfusion were significantly lower in the TXA group. Fifty-three of 112 patients required intra- and postoperative transfusion, and postoperative anticoagulants were given to 25/112 patients. The postoperative Hb level was lower, and the difference of pre- and postoperative Hb values was higher in the non-TXA group (not significant).

CONCLUSION

 Simultaneous systemic and topical application of TXA is a safe and efficient blood conservation strategy for adult patients undergoing major multilevel spinal surgery.

The Efficacy and Safety of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid for Perioperative Blood Management in Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Perioperative blood loss is a major concern in spinal fusion surgery and often requires blood transfusion. A large amount of perioperative blood loss might increase the risks of various perioperative complications. Recent clinical studies have focused on the perioperative administration of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in spinal fusion surgery. The aim of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EACA in spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were systematically searched up to April 2021. Data on perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion, and complications were extracted and analyzed by RevMan software.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled studies comprising 398 patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery were included in this systematic review. Compared with the control group, the EACA group had significantly lower total perioperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, postoperative hemoglobin, postoperative blood transfusion units, total blood transfusion units, and postoperative red blood cell transfusion units. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between the EACA and control groups in intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion units, intraoperative crystalloid administered, hospital stays, operative time, perioperative respiratory complications, and wound bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

EACA in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery is effective in perioperative hemostasis without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. However, more large-scale trials are needed to examine the long-term adverse side effects of EACA in spinal fusion surgery.

Comparison of Blood-Conserving and Allogenic Transfusion-Sparing Effects of Antifibrinolytics in Scoliosis Correction Surgery

Background:

Intraoperative antifibrinolytic drug administration is a safe and effective method of reducing blood loss and allogenic transfusions in patients undergoing spine deformity correction.

Aim:

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two antifibrinolytic drugs tranexamic acid (TXA) and epsilon amino caproic acid (EACA) in reducing peri-operative blood loss and transfusion requirements against a placebo control in patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing correction surgery.

Setting and Design:

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled comparative study.

Methodology:

Patients in TXA group received 50 mg.kg⁻¹ bolus and 10 mg.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion as against 100 mg.kg⁻¹ and 10 mg.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ infusion in EACA group. The placebo group had saline bolus and infusion. Parameters observed included baseline demographic and deformity data, duration of surgery, total peri-operative blood loss, and allogenic packed red cell transfusion requirements.

Statistical Analysis:

Mean and standard deviation were used to represent the quantitative continuous data, and percentage was used to represent categorical data. The Student's t-test and ANOVA were used to compare means between groups. Bonferroni's multiple comparison test was used to find out the association between categorical variables.

Results:

A total of 36 patients were enrolled with 12 patients in each group. Peri-operative blood loss was 50.1% lower in patients receiving TXA and 17.7% lower in patients receiving EACA compared with the placebo group. The volume of total packed red cell transfusion was 66.7% lower in patients receiving TXA and 45.6% lower in patients receiving EACA compared with placebo.

Conclusion:

TXA was more effective in reducing total peri-operative blood loss and allogenic transfusion requirement in idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery compared to EACA.

Multidisciplinary approaches to complication reduction in complex spine surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Complex spine surgery carries a high complication rate that can produce suboptimal outcomes for patients undergoing these extensive operations. However, multidisciplinary pathways introduced at multiple institutions have demonstrated a promising potential toward reducing the burden of complications in patients being treated for spinal deformities. To date, there has been no effort to systematically collate the multidisciplinary approaches in use at various institutions.

PURPOSE

The present study aims to determine effective multidisciplinary strategies for reducing the complication rate in complex spine surgery by analyzing existing institutional multidisciplinary approaches and delineating common themes across multiple practice settings.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We followed guidelines established under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The studies reported on data from PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science and Cochrane. We included articles that described either approaches to, or results from, the implementation of multidisciplinary paradigms during the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative phases of care for patients undergoing complex spine surgery. We excluded studies that only targeted one complication unless such an approach was in coordination with more extensive multidisciplinary planning at the same institution.

RESULTS

A total of 406 unique articles were identified. Following an initial determination based on title and abstract, 22 articles met criteria for full-text review, and 10 met the inclusion criteria to be included in the review. Key aspects of multidisciplinary approaches to complex spine surgery included extensive preoperative workup and interdisciplinary conferencing, intraoperative communication and monitoring, and postoperative floor management and discharge planning. These strategies produced decreases in surgical duration and complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first to systematically analyze multidisciplinary approaches to reduce complications in complex spine surgery. This review provides a roadmap toward reducing the elevated complication rate for patients undergoing complex spine surgery.

Minimizing Blood Loss in Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Broad narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

To review and summarize the current literature on guidelines, outcomes, techniques and indications surrounding multiple modalities of minimizing blood loss in spine surgery.

METHODS

A thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the guidelines, outcomes, techniques, and indications for multiple modalities of minimizing blood loss in spine surgery.

RESULTS

There is a large body of literature that provides a consensus on guidelines regarding the appropriate timing of discontinuation of anticoagulation, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and herbal supplements prior to surgery. Additionally, there is a more heterogenous discussion the utility of preoperative autologous blood donation facilitated by erythropoietin and iron supplementation for healthy patients slated for procedures with high anticipated blood loss and for whom allogeneic transfusion is likely. Intraoperative maneuvers available to minimize blood loss include positioning and maintaining normothermia. Tranexamic acid (TXA), bipolar sealer electrocautery, and topical hemostatic agents, and hypotensive anesthesia (mean arterial pressure (MAP) <65 mm Hg) should be strongly considered in cases with larger exposures and higher anticipated blood loss. There is strong level 1 evidence for the use of TXA in spine surgery as it reduces the overall blood loss and transfusion requirements.

CONCLUSION

As the volume and complexity of spinal procedures rise, intraoperative blood loss management has become a pivotal topic of research within the field. There are many tools for minimizing blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery. The current literature supports combining techniques to use a cost- effective multimodal approach to minimize blood loss in the perioperative period.

Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution in Spinal Deformity Surgery

Objective  To prospectively compare the clinical and laboratorial aspects of patients undergoing spine deformity surgery, using the acute normovolemic hemodilution technique with tranexamic acid, versus a control group with tranexamic acid alone, and to evaluate the influence of hemodilution in intraoperative bleeding and the need for homologous transfusion.

Materials and Methods  Comparative prospective study with patients aged between 12 and 65 years undergoing spine deformity surgery with the acute normovolemic hemodilution technique associated with tranexamic acid versus a control group to which only tranexamic acid (15 mg/kg) was administered. Laboratorial exams were performed and analyzed in three different moments.

Results  A total of 30 patients were included in the present study: 17 in the hemodilution group, and 13 in the control group. The mean duration of the surgery in the hemodilution group was longer. The number of levels submitted to surgery ranged from 7 to 16 in the hemodilution group, and from 4 to 13 in the control group. Osteotomy, predominantly of the posterior kind, was performed in 20 patients. There was more intraoperative bleeding in the control group. All patients were stable during the procedures. Only 6 participants needed homologous blood transfusion, mostly from the control group ( p  > 0.05).

Conclusion  There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the need for blood transfusion and intraoperative bleeding. The severity of the deformity was the main determinant for homologous blood transfusion.

Does Prophylactic Administration of TXA Reduce Mean Operative Time and Postoperative Blood Loss in Posterior Approach Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery Performed for Degenerative Spinal Disease?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a level III retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate association between prophylactic tranexamic acid (TXA) administration before 1 and 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion operations and perioperative blood loss (including intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drain output), mean operative time, postoperative transfusion, and postoperative venous thromboembolic events.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

TXA is a systemic antifibrinolytic that competitively inhibits lysine binding sites on plasminogen, reversibly blocking its binding to fibrin and impeding fibrinolysis and clot degradation. TXA's role in routine spinal surgery remains poorly described. Most spinal literature on perioperative TXA administration has considered operations performed for major adult and pediatric spinal deformity.

METHODS

Two groups, a study group composed of 75 patients who underwent 1 and 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion operations for degenerative indications who received TXA before the start of the procedure, and a control group composed of 75 patients who underwent similar surgeries for the same indications and did not receive TXA preoperatively, were retrospectively enrolled. Demographic, laboratory, and surgical data were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between groups with respect to surgery type, home anticoagulation, postoperative anticoagulation, preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit, estimated intraoperative blood loss, postoperative day 2 drain output, postoperative day 3 drain output, rate of postoperative transfusion, and rate of postoperative thromboembolic events. Statistically significant reductions were noted in the TXA group with regards to postoperative day 1 drain output (P<0.0041), total postoperative drain output (P=0.027), and mean surgical time (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, perioperative TXA administration was associated with reduced postoperative drain output and surgical time. Further higher-level studies are required to investigate the safety and utility of TXA's routine use in 1 and 2-level posterior lumbar fusion operations performed for degenerative indications.

Efficacy and safety of antifibrinolytic agents in spinal surgery: a network meta-analysis

Background:

Significant blood loss is still one of the most frequent complications in spinal surgery, which often necessitates blood transfusion. Massive perioperative blood loss and blood transfusion can create additional risks. Aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) are antifibrinolytics currently offered as prophylactic agents to reduce surgery-associated blood loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aprotinin, EACA, and low/high doses of TXA in spinal surgery, and assess the use of which agent is the most optimal intervention using the network meta-analysis (NMA) method.

Methods:

Five electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, and Web of Science, from the inception to March 1, 2018. Trials that were randomized and compared results between TXA, EACA, and placebo were identified. The NMA was conducted with software R 3.3.2 and STATA 14.0.

Results:

Thirty randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were analyzed. Aprotinin (standardized mean difference [SMD]=−0.65, 95% credibility intervals [CrI;−1.25, −0.06]), low-dose TXA (SMD = −0.58, 95% CrI [−0.92, −0.25]), and high-dose TXA (SMD = −0.70, 95% CrI [−1.04, −0.36]) were more effective than the respective placebos in reducing intraoperative blood loss. Low-dose TXA (SMD = −1.90, 95% CrI [−3.32, −0.48]) and high-dose TXA (SMD = −2.31, 95% CrI [−3.75, −0.87]) had less postoperative blood loss. Low-dose TXA (SMD = −1.07, 95% CrI [−1.82, −0.31]) and high-dose TXA (SMD = −1.07, 95% CrI [−1.82, −0.31]) significantly reduced total blood loss. However, only high-dose TXA (SMD = −2.07, 95% CrI [−3.26, −0.87]) was more effective in reducing the amount of transfusion, and was significantly superior to low-dose TXA in this regard (SMD = −1.67, 95% CrI [−3.20, −0.13]). Furthermore, aprotinin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.16, 95% CrI [0.05, 0.54]), EACA (OR = 0.46, 95% CrI [0.22, 0.97]) and high dose of TXA (OR = 0.34, 95% CrI [0.19, 0.58]) had a significant reduction in transfusion rates. Antifibrinolytics did not show a significantly increased risk of postoperative thrombosis. Results of ranking probabilities indicated that high-dose TXA had the greatest efficacy and a relatively high safety level.

Conclusions:

The antifibrinolytic agents are able to reduce perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement during spine surgery. And the high-dose TXA administration might be used as the optimal treatment to reduce blood loss and transfusion.

The Efficacy and Safety of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid for Blood Loss and Transfusions in Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in reducing the blood loss and transfusion volume during open spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for all studies written in English published on or before October 2018 in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library that compared antifibrinolytic agents with placebos for open spinal deformity surgeries. The primary outcomes included the total blood loss, intraoperative, and postoperative blood loss, transfusions volume and complication rate.

RESULTS

Seven studies that included 525 patients who were diagnosed with spinal deformity. Compared with placebo, the patients who received EACA showed a reduction in the postoperative blood loss (mean difference [MD] -249.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] -375.65 to -123.95; P = 0.0001) and total blood loss (MD -670.30; 95% CI -1142.63 to -197.98; P = 0.005). Furthermore, the patients treated with EACA received approximately 1.67 fewer units of blood (MD -1.67; 95% CI -3.10 to -0.24; P = 0.02). However, in this cohort, no statistically significant differences were observed in the intraoperative blood loss (MD -452.19; 95% CI -1082.21 to 177.83; P = 0.16) and complication rate (odds ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.16-3.24; P = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that EACA could be safe and potentially efficacious for reducing blood loss and transfusions volume in patients with spinal deformity surgeries when compared with placebo. In light of the significant heterogeneity, the findings of this meta-analysis should be confirmed in methodologically rigorous and adequately powered clinical trials.

Antifibrinolytic agents for paediatric scoliosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of antifibrinolytic agents for paediatric spine surgery.

BACKGROUND

Bleeding is an important consideration in paediatric scoliosis surgery; blood loss leads directly to higher morbidity and mortality. Antifibrinolytics are an attractive non-invasive method of reducing bleeding as evidenced in arthroplasty, cardiac surgery and adult scoliosis surgery.

METHODS

A thorough database search of Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, and a systematic review was performed.

RESULTS

Five randomised controlled trials were identified in this meta-analysis, consisting of a total of 285 spine surgery patients with subgroups of tranexamic acid (n = 101), epsilon aminocaproic acid (n = 61) and control (n = 123). This meta-analysis found that antifibrinolytics lead to statistically significant reductions in peri-operative blood loss (MD - 379.16, 95% CI [- 579.76, - 178.57], p < 0.001), intra-operative blood loss (MD - 516.42, 95% CI [- 1055.58, 22.74], p < 0.001), reduced fresh frozen plasma requirements (MD - 307.77, 95% CI [- 369.66, - 245.88], p < 0.001) and reduced post-operative blood loss (MD -  185.95, 95% CI [- 336.04, - 35.87], p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis concludes that antifibrinolytics lead to statistically significant reductions in peri-operative blood loss, intra-operative blood loss, reduced fresh frozen plasma requirements and reduced post-operative blood loss with TXA. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Unexpected higher blood loss associated with higher dose ε-aminocaproic acid in pediatric scoliosis surgery

The purpose of this study was to determine if a higher dosing of ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) is associated with less perioperative blood loss than a lower dose. A total of 74 patients having scoliosis surgery were analyzed. Of the 74 patients, 36 patients received EACA (10 mg/kg/h) and 38 patients received EACA (33 mg/kg/h). After controlling for key variables, an infusion of 33 mg/kg/h of EACA was associated with an increase in intraoperative blood loss of 8.1 ml/kg compared with an infusion of 10 mg/kg/h of EACA. A 33 mg/kg/h intraoperative infusion is associated with higher intraoperative blood loss than an infusion at 10 mg/kg/h.

Clinical Efficacy of Intra-Operative Cell Salvage System in Major Spinal Deformity Surgery

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of intra-operative cell salvage system (ICS) to decrease the need for allogeneic transfusions in patients undergoing major spinal deformity surgeries.

Methods

A total of 113 consecutive patients undergoing long level posterior spinal segmental instrumented fusion (≥5 levels) for spinal deformity correction were enrolled. Data including the osteotomy status, the number of fused segments, estimated blood loss, intra-operative transfusion amount by ICS (Cell Saver^®, Haemonetics^©, Baltimore, MA, USA) or allogeneic blood, postoperative transfusion amount, and operative time were collected and analyzed.

Results

The number of patients was 81 in ICS group and 32 in non-ICS group. There were no significant differences in demographic data and comorbidities between the groups. Autotransfusion by ICS system was performed in 53 patients out of 81 in the ICS group (65.4%) and the amount of transfused blood by ICS was 226.7 mL in ICS group. The mean intra-operative allogeneic blood transfusion requirement was significantly lower in the ICS group than non-ICS group (2.0 vs. 2.9 units, p=0.033). The regression coefficient of ICS use was -1.036.

Conclusion

ICS use could decrease the need for intra-operative allogeneic blood transfusion. Specifically, the use of ICS may reduce about one unit amount of allogeneic transfusion in major spinal deformity surgery.

Temporary inhibition of the plasminogen activator inhibits periosteal chondrogenesis and promotes periosteal osteogenesis during appendicular bone fracture healing

INTRODUCTION

Aminocaproic acid is approved as an anti-fibrinolytic for use in joint replacement and spinal fusion surgeries to limit perioperative blood loss. Previous animal studies have demonstrated a pro-osteogenic effect of aminocaproic acid in spine fusion models. Here, we tested if aminocaproic acid enhances appendicular bone healing and we sought to uncover the effect of aminocaproic acid on osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs) during bone regeneration.

METHODS

We employed a well-established murine femur fracture model in adult C57BL/6J mice after receiving two peri-operative injections of aminocaproic acid. Routine histological assays, biomechanical testing and micro-CT analyses were utilized to assess callus volume, and strength, progenitor cell proliferation, differentiation, and remodeling in vivo. Two disparate ectopic transplantation models were used to study the effect of the growth factor milieu within the early fracture hematoma on osteoprogenitor cell fate decisions.

RESULTS

Aminocaproic acid treated femur fractures healed with a significantly smaller cartilaginous callus, and this effect was also observed in the ectopic transplantation assays. We hypothesized that aminocaproic acid treatment resulted in a stabilization of the early fracture hematoma, leading to a change in the growth factor milieu created by the early hematoma. Gene and protein expression analysis confirmed that aminocaproic acid treatment resulted in an increase in Wnt and BMP signaling and a decrease in TGF-β-signaling, resulting in a shift from chondrogenic to osteogenic differentiation in this model of endochondral bone formation.

CONCLUSION

These experiments demonstrate for the first time that inhibition of the plasminogen activator during fracture healing using aminocaproic acid leads to a change in cell fate decision of periosteal osteoprogenitor cells, with a predominance of osteogenic differentiation, resulting in a larger and stronger bony callus. These findings may offer a promising new use of aminocaproic acid, which is already FDA-approved and offers a very safe risk profile.

Using Lean Process Improvement to Enhance Safety and Value in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Case of Spine Surgery

Lean methodology was developed in the manufacturing industry to increase output and decrease costs. These labor organization methods have become the mainstay of major manufacturing companies worldwide. Lean methods involve continuous process improvement through the systematic elimination of waste, prevention of mistakes, and empowerment of workers to make changes. Because of the profit and productivity gains made in the manufacturing arena using lean methods, several healthcare organizations have adopted lean methodologies for patient care. Lean methods have now been implemented in many areas of health care. In orthopaedic surgery, lean methods have been applied to reduce complication rates and create a culture of continuous improvement. A step-by-step guide based on our experience can help surgeons use lean methods in practice. Surgeons and hospital centers well versed in lean methodology will be poised to reduce complications, improve patient outcomes, and optimize cost/benefit ratios for patient care.

Indications and Outcomes of Cell Saver in Adolescent Scoliosis Correction Surgery: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the indications and outcomes for intraoperative cell salvage during adolescent scoliosis correction surgery by systematically reviewing all available evidence.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several blood conservation strategies exist to minimize the consequences of blood loss because of scoliosis correction surgery. The utility of intraoperative cell salvage has been contested in the literature with respect to benefits and cost. High-quality randomized control trials are needed to help surgeons make an informed decision about including Cell Saver into their practice.

METHODS

The databases Medline, Embase, Ovid Healthstar, and PubMed were searched for English language literature investigating Cell Saver use during adolescent scoliosis correction surgery, mean ages 10 to 19 years inclusively. Qualitative and quantitative findings from relevant studies are presented.

RESULTS

There were seven eligible studies that directly compared the use of Cell Saver (349 patients) against a Control (non-Cell Saver) group (244 patients). The majority of the demographic and hematologic data were consistent between both groups. The average volume of blood that was re-infused into patients in the Cell Saver group was 453.8 mL. Patients in the Cell Saver group received significantly fewer allogenic blood transfusions than the Control group, with 32.6% less intraoperatively, 45.9% less postoperatively, and 47.3% less perioperatively. On average, Cell Saver patients received 1.0 fewer unit of allogenic blood compared to the Control group patients.

CONCLUSION

Cell Saver reduces the demand for allogenic transfusion. This review supports the use of Cell Saver if the associated monetary costs are expected to be less than the cost of transfusing one unit of allogenic blood.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

The role of tranexamic acid in prevention of hemorrhage in major spinal surgeries

Background:

Blood loss that necessitates blood transfusion is one of the most frequent complications of major spinal surgeries. This study has been designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic tranexamic acid (TA) in decreasing perioperative blood loss.

Materials and Methods:

From January to August 2011, all the patients who needed major spinal surgeries and aged between 18 and 60-year-old were divided into two groups randomly, the experimental group received 10 mg/kg of TA 20 min after inducing the anesthesia as loading dose followed by 0.5 mg/kg/h until skin closure and the control group received equal amounts of normal saline as placebo. Intraoperative blood loss was recorded by estimating blood with the suction tube plus the number of bloody gasses. The amounts compared between the 2 groups and analyzed.

Results:

Forty patients were enrolled in this study in the first group intraoperative, the 1^st and 2^nd postoperative days, the mean blood loss were 574 ml, 80.5 ml, and 669.5 ml while in the second group were 797 ml, 124 ml, and 921.5 ml.

Conclusion:

TA seems to be safe and can be considered in spinal surgeries with significant excepted blood loss especially in female patients and instrumental procedures. We suggest further studies on TAs efficacy and safety in larger scales.

Effectiveness and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Deformity Surgery

Objective

Spinal deformity surgery has the potential risk of massive blood loss. To reduce surgical bleeding, the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) became popular in spinal surgery, recently. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of intra-operative TXA use to reduce surgical bleeding and transfusion requirements in spinal deformity surgery.

Methods

A total of 132 consecutive patients undergoing multi-level posterior spinal segmental instrumented fusion (≥5 levels) were analyzed retrospectively. Primary outcome measures included intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion amount and rate of transfusion. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative transfusion amount, rate of transfusion, and complications associated with TXA or allogeneic blood transfusions.

Results

The number of patients was 89 in TXA group and 43 in non-TXA group. There were no significant differences in demographic or surgical traits between the groups except hypertension. The EBL was significantly lower in TXA group than non-TXA group (841 vs. 1336 mL, p=0.002). TXA group also showed less intra-operative and postoperative transfusion requirements (544 vs. 812 mL, p=0.012; 193 vs. 359 mL, p=0.034). Based on multiple regression analysis, TXA use could reduce surgical bleeding by 371 mL (37 % of mean EBL). Complication rate was not different between the groups.

Conclusion

TXA use can effectively reduce the amount of intra-operative bleeding and transfusion requirements in spinal deformity surgery. Future randomized controlled study could confirm the routine use of TXA in major spinal surgery.

Association of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid With Blood Loss and Risk of Transfusion After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) reorients the acetabular cartilage through a complex series of pelvic osteotomies, which risks significant blood loss often necessitating blood transfusion. Therefore, it is important to identify effective strategies to manage blood loss and decrease morbidity after PAO. The purpose of this study was to determine the association of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA), an antifibrinolytic agent, with blood loss from PAO.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients out of 110 consecutive patients that underwent unilateral PAO for acetabular dysplasia met inclusion criteria. Fifty patients received EACA intraoperatively. Demographics, autologous blood predonation, anesthetic type, intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), cell-saver utilization, and transfusions were recorded. Total blood loss was calculated. Two-sample t-test and chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. The associations between EACA administration and calculated EBL, cell-saver utilization, intraoperative EBL, and maximum difference in postoperative hemoglobin were assessed via multiple regression, adjusting for confounders. Post hoc power analysis demonstrated sufficient power to detect a 250-mL difference in calculated EBL between groups. Alpha level was 0.05 for all tests.

RESULTS

No demographic differences existed between groups. Mean blood loss and allogeneic transfusion rates were not statistically significant between groups (P = .093 and .170, respectively). There were no differences in cell-saver utilization, intraoperative EBL, and/or postoperative hemoglobin. There was a higher rate of autologous blood utilization in the group not receiving EACA because of a clinical practice change.

CONCLUSIONS

EACA administration was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in blood loss or allogeneic transfusion in patients undergoing PAO.

A Comparison of Two Different Dosing Protocols for Tranexamic Acid in Posterior Spinal Fusion for Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Multilevel spinal fusions have typically been associated with significant blood loss. Previous studies have shown a reduction in blood loss with antifibrinolytics in both adolescent and adult spinal deformity patients. While this has been mirrored in other subspecialties as well, the dosing of TXA remains highly variable. To date, there remains a paucity of data guiding dosing for TXA in spine surgery and orthopedic surgery as a whole.

METHODS/DESIGN

One hundred and fifty patients from 3 institutions (50 each site) will be consecutively enrolled and randomized to either a high dose of TXA (50mg/kg loading followed by 20mg/kg hourly) or a lose dose (10mg/kg, then 1mg/kg hourly). Both surgeons and patients will be blinded to the treatment group. Primary outcomes will be perioperative blood loss, drain output, and transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes will be length of stay, complications, and overall cost.

DISCUSSION

The primary goal of this study is to provide level-1 comparative data for two TXA dosing regimens in adult spinal deformity surgery. Management of blood loss remains a critical factor in reducing complications during spinal deformity surgery. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between high- and low-dose TXA with respect to any of the primary or secondary outcomes.

Antifibrinolytics reduce blood loss in adult spinal deformity surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison of tranexamic acid (TXA), epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA), and placebo used intraoperatively in patients with adult spinal deformity.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide high-quality evidence regarding the comparative efficacies of TXA, EACA, and placebo in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spine deformity surgery usually involves substantial blood loss. The antifibrinolytics TXA and EACA have been shown to improve hemostasis in large blood loss surgical procedures.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion of at least 5 levels for correction of adult spinal deformity were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups. Primary outcome measures included intraoperative estimated blood loss, total loss, (estimated blood loss + postoperative blood loss), and transfusion rates.

RESULTS

Patients received TXA (n = 19), EACA (n = 19), or placebo (n = 13) in the operating room (mean ages: 60, 47, and 43 yr, respectively); TXA patients were significantly older and had larger estimated blood volumes than both other groups. Total losses were significantly reduced for EACA versus control, and there was a demonstrable but nonsignificant trend toward reduced intraoperative blood loss in both antifibrinolytic arms versus control. EACA had significant reductions in postoperative blood transfusions versus TXA.

CONCLUSION

The findings in this study support the use of antifibrinolytics to reduce blood loss in posterior adult spinal deformity surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Preliminary investigation of high-dose tranexamic acid for controlling intraoperative blood loss in patients undergoing spine correction surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

With a significant increase in the number and complexity of spinal deformity corrective surgeries, blood loss, often requiring massive intraoperative transfusions, becomes a major limiting factor during surgery. This scenario is particularly during posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR), where extensive intraoperative blood loss may pose a major risk to the patient, preventing smooth execution of the procedure. Tranexamic Acid (TXA) has been used in cardiac and orthopedic surgeries, including major spinal surgeries, to reduce blood loss and transfusion requirements for decades.

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of high doses of TXA in posterior spinal deformity corrective surgery, including PVCR procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study from a single institution.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Fifty-nine patients (age range 7 to 46 years old) with spinal deformities undergoing spinal corrective surgeries were included. The patients were divided into two groups: the TXA group (total of 26 patients, including 8 PVCR patients) and the control group (total of 33 patients, including 9 PVCR patients).

OUTCOME MEASURES

The analyzed outcome measures included estimated intraoperative blood loss, real blood loss (RBL; blood loss/blood volume×100%), blood transfusion requirements, coagulation parameters, complete blood count, liver function, and renal function. Lower limb vein thrombus, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic myocardial infarction, seizures, and acute renal failure were also recorded.

METHODS

Before skin incision, the patients in the TXA group received an intravenous loading dose of 100 mg/Kg over a 20-minute period, followed by a maintenance infusion of 10 mg/Kg/h until skin closure was completed. The patients in the control group received saline infusion of a similar volume. Statistics included estimated intraoperative blood loss, RBL, blood transfusion requirements, coagulation parameters, complete blood count, liver function, and renal function. All patients in this study were also carefully monitored for consciousness level, breathing status, chest tightness or pain, and urine output after surgery. These were done to detect the presence or absence of pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, seizures, and acute renal failure. Patients treated with TXA were examined via vascular ultrasound before and after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the demographic or surgical traits between the two groups. The blood loss of the patients in the TXA group was 2,441±1,666 mL, whereas that of the control group patients was 4,789±4,719 mL. The difference was statistically significant (p<.05). The average RBL of the patients in the TXA group was 80.6%±49.6% versus 160.8%±163.1% in the control group (p<.05). The blood transfusion requirements for the patients in the TXA group were significantly less than that in the control group (p<.05). Blood loss, RBL, and blood transfusion requirements were all significantly lower in the TXA group, compared with the control group among both PVCR patients and non-PVCR patients. In the TXA group, there was an average of 57.4% reduced blood loss in patients who received PVCR and 39.8% in patients not receiving PVCR. There were no differences in liver and renal functions between the TXA and control groups. There was no lower limb vein thrombus, symptomatic myocardial infarction, symptomatic pulmonary embolism, seizures, or acute renal failure reported in the TXA group.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, high doses of TXA have been shown to effectively control blood loss and reduce the transfusion requirement. This effect was more apparent in patients receiving PVCR. No adverse drug reaction was recorded in the study. In the future, prospective randomized controlled trials to validate our results will be necessary. Future studies conducted on older patient cohort may also be necessary to confirm the safety of extending the use of TXA to the older patients.

Use of tranexamic acid for controlling bleeding in thoracolumbar scoliosis surgery with posterior instrumentation

OBJECTIVE

Scoliosis surgery involves major blood loss and frequently requires blood transfusion. The cost and risks involved in using allogeneic blood have motivated investigation of methods capable of reducing patients' bleeding during operations. One of these methods is to use antifibrinolytic drugs, and tranexamic acid is among these. The aim of this study was to assess the use of this drug for controlling bleeding in surgery to treat idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study in which the medical files of 40 patients who underwent thoracolumbar arthrodesis by means of a posterior route were analyzed. Of these cases, 21 used tranexamic acid and were placed in the test group. The others were placed in the control group. The mean volumes of bleeding during and after the operation and the need for blood transfusion were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The group that used tranexamic acid had significantly less bleeding during the operation than the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding postoperative bleeding and the need for blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid was effective in reducing bleeding during the operation, as demonstrated in other studies. The correlation between its use and the reduction in the need for blood transfusion is multifactorial and could not be established in this study. We believe that tranexamic acid may be a useful resource and that it deserves greater attention in randomized double-blind prospective series, with proper control over variables that directly influence blood loss.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of intravenous tranexamic acid administration in managing perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery

This systematic review aimed to identify the effectiveness of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) administration in managing perioperative blood loss in patients undergoing spine surgery. The study design was a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quantitative articles were pooled in a statistical meta-analysis using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistical Assessment and Review Instrument. Twelve studies totaling 934 participants carried out between 1960 and 2013 were included in the review. Intraoperative blood loss showed statistically significant (P < .0001) blood loss in the control group compared with that in the treatment group. Perioperative blood loss was approaching significance for blood loss in the control group with an overall P = .067. TXA helps reduce perioperative blood loss for patients undergoing spine surgery. TXA should be administered to patients undergoing spine surgery when significant blood loss is anticipated.

The effects of Amicar and TXA on lumbar spine fusion in an animal model

STUDY DESIGN

Animal model.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether aminocaproic acid (Amicar) and tranexamic acid (TXA) inhibit spine fusion volume.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Amicar and TXA are antifibrinolytics used to reduce perioperative bleeding. Prior in vitro data showed that antifibrinolytics reduce osteoblast bone mineralization. This study tested whether antifibrinolytics Amicar and TXA inhibit spine fusion.

METHODS

Posterolateral L4-L6 fusion was performed in 50 mice, randomized into groups of 10, which received the following treatment before and after surgery: (1) saline; (2) TXA 100 mg/kg; (3) TXA 1000 mg/kg; (4) Amicar 100 mg/kg; and (5) Amicar 1000 mg/kg. High-resolution plane radiography was performed after 5 weeks and micro-CT (computed tomography) was performed at the end of the 12-week study. Radiographs were graded using the Lenke scale. Micro-CT was used to quantify fusion mass bone volume. One-way analysis of variance by ranks with Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to compare the radiographical scores. One-way analysis of variance with least significant difference post hoc testing was used to compare the micro-CT bone volume.

RESULTS

The average±standard deviation bone volume/total volume (%) measured in the saline, TXA 100 mg/kg, TXA 1000 mg/kg, Amicar 100 mg/kg, and Amicar 1000 mg/kg groups were 10.8±2.3%, 9.7±2.2%, 13.4±3.2%, 15.5±5.2%, and 17.9±3.5%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the Amicar 100 mg/kg (P<0.05) and Amicar 1000 mg/kg (P<0.001) groups compared with the saline group. There was greater bone volume in the Amicar groups compared with the TXA group (P<0.001). There was more bone volume in the TXA 1000 mg/kg group compared with TXA 100 mg/kg (P<0.05) but the bone volume in neither of the TXA groups was different to saline (P=0.49). There were no between-group differences observed using plane radiographical scoring.

CONCLUSION

Amicar significantly "enhanced" the fusion bone mass in a dose-dependent manner, whereas TXA did not have a significant effect on fusion compared with saline control.These data are in contrast to prior in vitro data that antifibrinolytics inhibit osteoblast bone mineralization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

Use of aprotinin to reduce blood loss and transfusion in major orthopedic surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUD

Conflicting reports have been published regarding the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin in reducing blood loss and transfusion in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin in reducing blood loss and transfusion in major orthopedic surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies. Only randomized controlled trials were eligible for this study. The weighted mean difference in blood loss, and number of transfusions per patient and the summary risk ratio of transfusion requirements, and deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) were calculated in the aprotinin-treated group and the control group.

RESULTS

Eighteen randomized controlled trials involving 1276 patients were included. The use of aprotinin reduced total blood loss by a mean of 498.88 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]; -735.03 to -262.72), intra-operative blood loss by a mean of 246.11 ml (95% CI; -352.11 to -140.11), post-operative blood loss by a mean of 169.11 ml (95% CI; -234.06 to -105.55), the number of blood transfusions per patient by 0.93 units (95% CI; -1.36 to -0.51). Aprotinin led to a signficant reduction in transfusion requirements (RR 0.59; 95% CI; 0.51 to 0.69) and no increase in the risk of DVT (RR 0.58; 95% CI; 0.38 to 1.08).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis shows that aprotinin could significantly reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, and it did not appear to increase the risk of DVT.

The relative efficacy of antifibrinolytics in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Antifibrinolytics can reduce intraoperative blood loss. The primary aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of intraoperative tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and placebo at reducing perioperative blood loss and the transfusion rate in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal arthrodesis.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and placebo used intraoperatively in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. One hundred and twenty-five patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were randomly assigned to the tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, or control groups. Parameters recorded included estimated blood loss, hematocrit, blood product usage, drain output, and total blood losses. The primary outcomes were intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage. Secondary outcomes were transfusion requirements and hematocrit changes both intraoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-five patients (ninety-seven female and twenty-eight male, with a mean age of fifteen years) were randomized to receive tranexamic acid (thirty-six patients), epsilon-aminocaproic acid (forty-two patients), or saline solution (forty-seven patients). The groups were similar at baseline, with one exception: the saline solution group had a higher estimated blood volume at baseline than the tranexamic acid group. Both tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid reduced the estimated blood loss per degree and estimated blood loss per pedicle screw. Epsilon-aminocaproic acid, but not tranexamic acid, reduced estimated blood loss and estimated blood loss per level. Tranexamic acid also reduced total blood losses compared with epsilon-aminocaproic acid or saline solution. In an analysis controlling for level, degree, and number of anchors, tranexamic acid reduced drain output and total blood losses. Tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid had a smaller decrease in hematocrit postoperatively. In an analysis controlling for the mean arterial pressure during surgical exposure, tranexamic acid reduced estimated blood loss and total blood losses. Overall, antifibrinolytics (tranexamic acid or epsilon-aminocaproic acid) reduced estimated blood loss, total blood losses, and the decline in hematocrit postoperatively compared with saline solution. There was no difference among the groups with respect to the transfusion rate, duration of surgery, levels fused, or pedicle screws placed.

CONCLUSIONS

Tranexamic acid and epsilon-aminocaproic acid reduced operative blood loss but not transfusion rate. Tranexamic acid is more effective at reducing postoperative drainage and total blood losses compared with epsilon-aminocaproic acid. Maintenance of the mean arterial pressure at &lt;75 mm Hg during surgical exposure appears to be critical for maximizing antifibrinolytic benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aprotinin and transfusion requirements in pediatric craniofacial surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate transfusion requirements in children receiving aprotinin during craniofacial surgery.

BACKGROUND

Pediatric craniofacial procedures may involve massive blood loss. Aprotinin may decrease perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements.

METHODS

Patients (aged 1 month to 3 years) who had major reconstructive craniofacial surgery received intraoperative aprotinin (13 patients) or placebo (13 patients). Administered colloids and blood products were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients in the aprotinin and placebo groups had similar mean age, body weight, body surface area, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Mean volumes of total colloids (aprotinin group: 70 ± 40 ml; and placebo group: 120 ± 80 ml; P ≤ 0.05) and packed red blood cells (aprotinin group: 380 ± 90 ml; and placebo group: 550 ± 200 ml; P ≤ 0.004) were less in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group. Mean urine output during surgery was greater in the aprotinin group than in the placebo group (320 ± 200 ml vs 150 ± 70 ml, respectively; P ≤ 0.003). Mean blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine values after surgery were similar between the groups. Complications of aprotinin included anaphylaxis (one patient) and rash (one patient); no deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Aprotinin was associated with decreased packed red blood cell transfusion requirements in children undergoing craniofacial surgery, with no renal toxicity or death. Aprotinin is no longer available for clinical use in the USA because of adverse effects in adults; re-evaluation of aprotinin is warranted for children scheduled to undergo surgery involving potentially high blood loss.

Efficacy and safety of using antifibrinolytic agents in spine surgery: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Spine surgery, particularly reconstructive surgery, can be associated with significant blood loss, and blood transfusion. Antifibrinolytic agents are used routinely to reduce bleeding in cardiac, orthopaedic, and hepatic surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of using antifibrinolytic agents in reducing blood loss and blood transfusions in spine surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of all related studies written in English published by October 2012 was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials that reported the drug dosage, total blood loss, blood transfusion and incidence of deep vein thrombosis as the primary outcome were included.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 482 patients were identified. Patients receiving antifibrinolytic agents had reduced blood loss (WMD =-288.8, 95 % CI - 46.49, - 110.19; P = 0.002), reduced blood transfusion (WMD =-242.7, 95 % CI - 422.57, - 62.95; P = 0.008), reduced blood transfusion rate (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58, 0.93; p = 0.010) and no increase (RR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.03, 2.22; P = 0.21) in the risk of deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that antifibrinolytic agents significantly decrease blood loss, blood transfusion, and there is no increase in the risk of deep vein thrombosisfor transfusion requirements in spine surgery.

Anesthetic considerations in acute spinal cord trauma

Patients with actual or potential spinal cord injury (SCI) are frequently seen at adult trauma centers, and a large number of these patients require operative intervention. All polytrauma patients should be assumed to have an SCI until proven otherwise. Pre-hospital providers should take adequate measures to immobilize the spine for all trauma patients at the site of the accident. Stabilization of the spine facilitates the treatment of other major injuries both in and outside the hospital. The presiding goal of perioperative management is to prevent iatrogenic deterioration of existing injury and limit the development of secondary injury whilst providing overall organ support, which may be adversely affected by the injury. This review article explores the anesthetic implications of the patient with acute SCI. A comprehensive literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, conference proceedings and internet sites for relevant literature was performed. Reference lists of relevant published articles were also examined. Searches were carried out in October 2010 and there were no restrictions by study design or country of origin. Publication date of included studies was limited to 1990–2010.

Predictive factors for the use of autologous cell saver transfusion in lumbar spinal surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for cell saver transfusion in lumbar spinal surgery and determine if cell saver transfusions affected intraoperative or postoperative transfusion rates.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cell saver has been used to minimize allogeneic blood transfusion in lumbar spinal surgery. Conflicting reports exist, which call into question the efficacy of cell saver use.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of randomly selected patients who underwent posterolateral fusion with or without transforaminal interbody fusion from July 2010 to June 2011. Transfusion rates and transfusion-related complications were determined. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for use of autologous cell saver transfusion.

RESULTS

There were 178 females and 107 males, with a mean age of 57.2 years. Of the 285 cases, 39 had no cell saver available, 147 had cell saver available but no autologous blood was recovered or transfused and 99 had an autologous cell saver transfusion. Patients who had cell saver transfusion had a higher rate of intraoperative allogeneic blood transfusion (52%) compared with those who did not (22%). There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative transfusions or transfusion-related reactions between patients who did and did not have cell saver transfusion. Patient's age, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, use of anticoagulants preoperatively, primary or revision surgery, iliac crest bone graft harvest, anesthesiologist, or surgeon had no significant effect on cell saver infusion. Body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06), number of posterolateral fusion levels fused (OR = 2.50), and number of transforaminal interbody fusions performed (OR = 2.41) were independent risk factors for the use of autologous cell saver transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Body mass index, multi-level fusion and transforaminal interbody fusion result in increased use of autologous cell saver transfusion in lumbar spinal surgery. Use of autologous cell saver transfusion did not reduce the requirement for intraoperative or postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma (SEH): incidence, risk factors, onset, and management

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) is a rare, yet potentially devastating complication of spinal surgery. There is limited evidence available regarding the risk factors and timing for development of symptomatic SEH after spinal surgery.

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence, risk factors, time of the onset, and effect of early evacuation of symptomatic SEH after spinal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter case control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All patients who underwent open spinal surgery between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2006, at the National Hospital For Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN) and the Wellington Hospital (WH) were reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Frankel grade.

METHODS

Patients who developed SEH and underwent evacuation of the hematoma were identified. Two controls per case were selected. Each control had undergone a procedure with similar complexity, at the same section of the spine, at the same hospital, and under the same surgeon within 6 months of the initial operation.

RESULTS

A total of 4,568 open spinal operations were performed at NHNN and WH. After spinal surgery, 0.22% of patients developed symptomatic SEH. Alcohol greater than 10 units a week (p=.031), previous spinal surgery (p=.007), and multilevel procedures (p=.002) were shown to be risk factors. Initial symptoms of SEH presented after a median time of 2.7 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 1.1-126.1). Patients who had evacuation surgery within 6 hours of the onset of initial symptoms improved a median of 2 (IQR, 1.0-3.0) Frankel grades, and those who had surgery more than 6 hours after the onset of symptoms improved 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-1.5) Frankel grade, p=.379.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic postoperative SEH is rare, occurring in 0.22% of cases. Alcohol consumption greater than 10 units a week, multilevel procedure, and previous spinal surgery were identified as risk factors for developing SEH. Spinal epidural hematoma often presents early in the postoperative period, highlighting the importance of close patient monitoring within the first 4 hours after surgery. This study suggests that earlier surgical intervention may result in greater neurological recovery.

Effects of preoperative β-blocker on blood loss and blood transfusion during spinal surgeries with sodium nitroprusside-controlled hypotension

BACKGROUND

The present study sought to determine whether premedication with oral β-blocker before hypotensive anesthesia with sodium nitroprusside could improve the quality of surgical field, decrease the blood loss, and decrease the need for homologous blood transfusion and duration of surgery.

METHODS

Eighty patients scheduled for spinal fixation surgery were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were classified into two groups: Group I received oral atenolol 50 mg twice one day before surgery; and Group II received placebo tablets identical in appearance to atenolol tablets for the same period and interval. All patients in both the groups received intraoperative sodium nitroprusside (SNP) as a hypotensive agent. Hemodynamic variables, amount of sodium nitroprusside used, quality of surgical field, and the amount of homologous blood transfusion and blood loss were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Heart rate and amount of SNP used were significantly less (P<0.0001) in the atenolol group, but no significant difference was found in intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) between the two groups. The time of surgeries was significantly shorter in Group I than in Group II (185±15.21 vs 225±12.61 min), P<0.0001. The quality of surgical field was better in Group I than in Group II in all times of measurements, P<0.0001. The amount of blood loss and the amount of packed red blood cells transfused were significantly less in Group I than in Group II, P<0.0001. No clinically significant complications were observed in either group.

CONCLUSION

Premedication with oral atenolol 50 mg twice/day for one day before hypotensive anesthesia with SNP during spinal surgeries seems to be clinically safe and effective to reduce heart rate, amount of SNP used, amount of blood loss, and amount of blood transfused with better quality of surgical field.

Does the intraoperative tranexamic acid decrease operative blood loss during posterior spinal fusion for treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in decreasing operative blood loss and the need for transfusion during posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Blood loss associated with spinal surgery is a common potential cause of morbidity and often requires a blood transfusion, which subjects patients to the known risks of blood transfusion including transmission of diseases. Since the 1990s, intraoperative administration of antifibrinolytics has gained popularity. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of TXA in controlling blood loss during posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents at 1 institution.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative analysis of 106 consecutive adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion procedures at 1 institution was performed. Patients were analyzed according to treatment group: controls (63) and TXA (43). There were no significant differences in demographic (age, sex, and comorbidities) or surgical traits (surgical time, number of fused vertebrae, preoperative hematocrit and hemoglobin) between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

TXA group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (613 ± 195 mL) than the control group (1079 ± 421 mL; P < 0.001) as well as postoperative blood loss (155 ± 86 mL and 263 ± 105 mL, respectively; P < 0.001). TXA group received significantly less blood during the surgical procedure than the control group (258 ± 246 mL and 377 ± 200 mL, respectively; P < 0.001). There were no major intraoperative complications for any of the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

TXA treatment group lost significantly less blood and received significantly fewer blood transfusions than the control group without significant differences in intra- and postoperative complications. A multicenter randomized prospective analysis would provide additional information of the efficacy and safety of TXA.

Adult spine deformity

Adult spinal deformity may occur as the result of a number of conditions and patients may present with a heterogeneous group of symptoms. Multiple etiologies may cause spinal deformity; however, symptoms are associated with progressive and asymmetric degeneration of the spinal elements potentially leading to neural element compression. Symptoms and clinical presentation vary and may be related to progressive deformity, axial back pain, and/or neurologic symptoms. Spinal deformity is becoming more common as adults 55-64 years of age are the fastest growing proportion of the U.S. population. As the percentage of elderly in the United States accelerates, more patients are expected to present with painful spinal conditions, potentially requiring spinal surgery. The decision between operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity is based on the severity and type of the patient's symptoms as well as the magnitude and risk of potential interventions.

Efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis with instability: a retrospective case control study

BACKGROUND

Degenerative spinal stenosis and instability requiring multilevel spine surgery has been associated with large blood losses. Factors that affect perioperative blood loss include time of surgery, surgical procedure, patient height, combined anterior/posterior approaches, number of levels fused, blood salvage techniques, and the use of anti-fibrinolytic medications. This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in spine surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective case control study includes 97 patients who had to undergo surgery because of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and instability. All operations included spinal decompression, interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation (4-5 segments). Forty-six patients received 1 g tranexamic acid intravenous, preoperative and six hours and twelve hours postoperative; 51 patients without tranexamic acid administration were evaluated as a control group. Based on the records, the intra- and postoperative blood losses were measured by evaluating the drainage and cell saver systems 6, 12 and 24 hours post operation. Additionally, hemoglobin concentration and platelet concentration were reviewed. Furthermore, the number of red cell transfusions given and complications associated with tranexamic acid were assessed.

RESULTS

The postoperative hemoglobin concentration demonstrated a statistically significant difference with a p value of 0.0130 showing superiority for tranexamic acid use (tranexamic acid group: 11.08 g/dl, SD: 1.68; control group: 10.29 g/dl, SD: 1.39). The intraoperative cell saver volume and drainage volume after 24 h demonstrated a significant difference as well, which indicates a less blood loss in the tranexamic acid group than the control group. The postoperative drainage volume at12 hours showed no significant differences; nor did the platelet concentration Allogenic blood transfusion (two red cell units) was needed for eight patients in the tranexamic acid group and nine in the control group because of postoperative anemia. Complications associated with the administration of tranexamic acid, e.g. renal failure, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests a less blood loss when administering tranexamic acid in posterior lumbar spine surgery as demonstrated by the higher postoperative hemoglobin concentration and the less blood loss. But given the relatively small volume of blood loss in the patients of this study it is underpowered to show a difference in transfusion rates.

Reducing perioperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major spine surgery

At present, individual techniques, including intraoperative acute normovolemic hemodilution, use of tranexamic acid, use of intrathecal morphine, proper positioning, and modification of operative techniques, seem most promising for reducing perioperative blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion in patients undergoing major spine surgery. Other techniques including preoperative autologous predonation; mandatory discontinuation of use of antiplatelet agents; intraoperative and postoperative red-blood-cell salvage; use of aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, recombinant factor VIIa, or desmopressin; induced hypotension; avoidance of hypothermia; and minimally invasive operative techniques require additional studies to either establish their effectiveness or address safety considerations.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. This version of the review includes a sensitivity analysis excluding trials authored by Prof. Joachim Boldt.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.