Early renal graft dysfunction. The role of preformed antibodies to DR-typed lymphoblastoid cell lines

On a Long and Winding Road: Alloantibodies in Organ Transplantation

Today we know that both the humoral and the cellular arm of the immune system are engaged in severe immunological challenges. A close interaction between B and T cells can be observed in most "natural" challenges, including infections, malignancies, and autoimmune diseases. The importance and power of humoral immunity are impressively demonstrated by the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Organ transplant rejection is a normal immune response to a completely "artificial" challenge. It took a long time before the multifaceted action of different immunological forces was recognized and a unified, generally accepted opinion could be formed. Here, we address prominent paradigms and paradigm shifts in the field of transplantation immunology. We identify several instances in which the transplant community missed a timely paradigm shift because essential, available knowledge was ignored. Moreover, we discuss key findings that critically contributed to our understanding of transplant immunology but sometimes developed with delay and in a roundabout way, as was the case with antibody-mediated rejection-a main focus of this article. These include the discovery of the molecular principles of histocompatibility, the recognition of the microcirculation as a key interface of immune damage, the refinement of alloantibody detection, the description of C4d as a footmark of endothelium-bound antibody, and last but not least, the developments in biopsy-based diagnostics beyond conventional morphology, which only now give us a glimpse of the enormous complexity and pathogenetic diversity of rejection.

The Complement System in Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the therapy of choice for patients who suffer from end-stage renal diseases. Despite improvements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive treatments, long-term graft survival remains a challenge. A large body of evidence documented that the complement cascade, a part of the innate immune system, plays a crucial role in the deleterious inflammatory reactions that occur during the transplantation process, such as brain or cardiac death of the donor and ischaemia/reperfusion injury. In addition, the complement system also modulates the responses of T cells and B cells to alloantigens, thus playing a crucial role in cellular as well as humoral responses to the allograft, which lead to damage to the transplanted kidney. Since several drugs that are capable of inhibiting complement activation at various stages of the complement cascade are emerging and being developed, we will discuss how these novel therapies could have potential applications in ameliorating outcomes in kidney transplantations by preventing the deleterious effects of ischaemia/reperfusion injury, modulating the adaptive immune response, and treating antibody-mediated rejection.

Glomerular C4d deposits can mark structural capillary wall remodelling in thrombotic microangiopathy and transplant glomerulopathy: C4d beyond active antibody-mediated injury: a retrospective study

Peritubular capillary C4d (ptc-C4d) usually marks active antibody-mediated rejection, while pseudolinear glomerular capillary C4d (GBM-C4d) is of undetermined diagnostic significance, especially when seen in isolation without concurrent ptc-C4d. We correlated GBM-C4d with structural GBM abnormalities and active antibody-mediated rejection in 319 renal transplant and 35 control native kidney biopsies. In kidney transplants, ptc-C4d was associated with GBM-C4d in 97% by immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and 61% by immunohistochemistry (IHC; P < 0.001). Transplant glomerulopathy correlated with GBM-C4d (P < 0.001) and presented with isolated GBM-C4d lacking ptc-C4d in 69% by IF and 40% by IHC. Strong isolated GBM-C4d was found post year-1 in repeat biopsies with transplant glomerulopathy. GBM-C4d staining intensity correlated with Banff cg scores (rs = 0.45, P < 0.001). Stepwise exclusion and multivariate logistic regression corrected for active antibody-mediated rejection showed significant correlations between GBM duplication and GBM-C4d (P = 0.001). Native control biopsies with thrombotic microangiopathies demonstrated GBM-C4d in 92% (IF, P < 0.001) and 35% (IHC). In conclusion, pseudolinear GBM-C4d staining can reflect two phenomena: (i) structural GBM changes with duplication in native and transplant kidneys or (ii) active antibody-mediated rejection typically accompanied by ptc-C4d. While ptc-C4d is a dynamic 'etiologic' marker for active antibody-mediated rejection, isolated strong GBM-C4d can highlight architectural glomerular remodelling.

Detection of alloantibody-mediated complement activation: A diagnostic advance in monitoring kidney transplant rejection?

OBJECTIVE

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is an important cause of kidney allograft injury. In the last two decades, detection of complement split product C4d along transplant capillaries, a footprint of antibody-mediated classical complement activation, has evolved as a useful diagnostic marker of ABMR. While it was recognized that ABMR may occur also in the absence of C4d, numerous studies have shown that C4d deposition may indicate a more severe rejection phenotype associated with poor graft survival. Such studies suggest a possible diagnostic benefit of ex vivo monitoring the complement-activating capability of circulating alloantibodies.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature between 1993 and 2015, focusing on in vivo (biopsy work-up) and in vitro detection (modified bead array technology) of HLA antibody-triggered classical complement activation in kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

Precise HLA antibody detection methods, in particular Luminex-based single antigen bead (SAB) assays, have provided a valuable basis for the design of techniques for in vitro detection of HLA antibody-triggered complement activation reflected by C1q, C4 or C3 split product deposition to the bead surface. Establishing such assays it was recognized that deposition of complement products to SAB, which critically depends on antibody binding strength, may be a cardinal trigger of the prozone effect, a troublesome in vitro artifact caused by a steric interference with IgG detection reagents. False-low IgG results, especially on SAB with extensive antibody binding, have to be considered when interpreting studies analyzing the diagnostic value of complement in relation to standard IgG detection. Levels of complement-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were shown to correlate with the results of standard crossmatch tests, suggesting potential application for crossmatch prediction. Moreover, while the utility of pre-transplant complement detection, at least in crossmatch-negative transplant recipients, is controversially discussed, a series of studies have shown that the appearance of post-transplant complement-fixing DSA may be associated with C4d deposition in transplant capillaries and a particular risk of graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The independent value of modified single antigen bead assays, as compared to a careful analysis of standard IgG detection, which may be affected considerably by complement dependent artifacts, needs to be clarified. Whether they have the potential to improve the predictive accuracy of our current diagnostic repertoire warrants further study.

Antibodies, isotypes and complement in allograft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Classical complement activation is a key step in the process of antibody-mediated rejection. Emphasizing novel diagnostic strategies, this study will discuss recent studies highlighting the particular relevance of alloantibodies with complement-fixing ability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Reinforcing the pivotal role of complement, numerous studies have shown tight associations of capillary C4d deposition, a 'footprint' of alloantibody-triggered complement activation, with the occurrence of allograft injury. Distribution patterns of immunoglobulin isotypes or subclasses, which strongly differ in their ability to activate complement, may not adequately reflect the actual pathogenetic relevance of detected allosensitization. This fact may be explained by the finding that other variables, such as antibody-binding density or a synergism of antibodies against different epitopes of the same antigen, may contribute to complement activation. An attractive approach to distinguish between complement-fixing and presumably less harmful noncomplement-fixing alloreactivities could be the detection of C4d deposition in vitro. Applying such techniques, recent studies have shown that human leukocyte antigen reactivity with C4d-fixing ability, in contrast to noncomplement-fixing sensitization, may strongly predict antibody-mediated rejection and inferior graft survival.

SUMMARY

Considering the pivotal role of complement, technologies that uncover the complement-fixing ability of alloantibodies may be of particular interest for the selective detection of deleterious sensitization.

Red blood cell age and potentiation of transfusion-related pathology in trauma patients

The specific negative clinical manifestations associated with the transfusion of stored red blood cells (RBCs) and the corresponding mechanisms responsible for such phenomena remain poorly defined. Our recent studies document that leukoreduced older RBC units potentiate transfusion-related toxicity in trauma patients. It is our hypothesis that the transfusion of relatively older blood impedes microvascular perfusion. The central mechanisms proposed to mediate this microcirculatory alteration include: 1) the loss of RBC-dependent control of nitric oxide-mediated homeostasis concerning vasodilation and 2) immune cell and complement activation. In this review, we outline the background for our hypothesis and detail our current investigations toward the understanding of this pathophysiology.

Mechanisms involved in antibody- and complement-mediated allograft rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection has become critical clinically because this form of rejection is usually unresponsive to conventional anti-rejection therapy, and therefore, it has been recognized as a major cause of allograft loss. Our group developed experimental animal models of vascularized organ transplantation to study pathogenesis of antibody- and complement-mediated endothelial cell injury leading to graft rejection. In this review, we discuss mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft rejection resulting from activation of complement by C1q- and MBL (mannose-binding lectin)-dependent pathways and interactions with a variety of effector cells, including macrophages and monocytes through Fcgamma receptors and complement receptors.

Clinical relevance of preformed C4d-fixing and non-C4d-fixing HLA single antigen reactivity in renal allograft recipients

Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA), especially those fixing complement, may pose a particular immunologic risk to transplant recipients. To assess the clinical impact of C4d- or non-C4d-fixing (IgG) HLA sensitization, pretransplant sera obtained from 338 kidney allograft recipients prescreened by FlowPRA were retrospectively evaluated by Luminex single antigen (SA) testing using a novel fluorescent-labeled anti-C4d reagent for detection of antibody-triggered C4d deposition in addition to IgG binding. Recipients with [IgG]DSA (n = 39) showed a substantially higher rate of C4d positive rejection (33%) than 16 patients with [IgG] non-DSA (0%) or 283 antibody-negative patients (4%, multivariate analysis excluding retransplantation because of high co-linearity: P < 0.0001), and adversely affected 5-year death-censored graft survival (74% vs. 81% and 90%, respectively, multivariate model: P < 0.05). [C4d] DSA (n = 21) and [C4d] non-DSA (n = 25) increased rates of C4d positive rejections to a similar extent (24% and 28% vs. 4% in recipients without C4d-fixing reactivity; multivariate analysis: P <or= 0.002) with a trend towards adverse 5-year graft survival (76% and 76% vs. 90%; P <or= 0.2). In conclusion, Luminex-based characterization of HLA sensitization may be a useful strategy for risk stratification. Possibly as a result of intensified immunosuppression in presensitized recipients, identification of C4d-fixing DSA was not associated with a further increase of rejection and graft loss rates.

New concepts of complement in allorecognition and graft rejection

In transplantation, activation of complement has largely been equated to antibody-mediated rejection, but complement is also important in recognition of apoptotic and necrotic cells as well as in modifying antigen presentation to T cells and B cells. As a part of the innate immune system, complement is one of the first responses to injury, and it can determine the direction and magnitude of the subsequent responses. Consequently, the effects of complement in allorecognition and graft rejection are increased when organs are procured from cadaver donors because these organs sustain a series of stresses from brain death, prolonged life support, ischemia and finally reperfusion that initiate proinflammatory processes and tissue injury. In addition, these organs are transplanted to patients, who frequently have been sensitized to histocompatibility antigens as the result of transfusions, pregnancies or transplants. Complement activation generates a series of biologically active effector molecules that can modulate graft rejection by directly binding to the graft or by modifying the response of macrophages, T and B cells of the recipient. However, complement is regulated and the process of regulation produces split products that can decrease as well as increase immune responses. Small animal models have been developed to test these variables. The guide for evaluating results from these models remains clinical findings because there are significant differences between the rodent and human complement systems.

Oxidative stress implication in a new ex-vivo cardiac concordant xenotransplantation model

Xenotransplantation (XT) reveals a growing interest for the treatment of cardiomyopathy. The major barrier is an acute vascular rejection due to an acute humoral rejection. This pathogenesis is a difficult issue and in order to elaborate means for its prevention, we analysed the implication of oxidative stress (OS) on hearts from mini-pigs followed by reperfusion with either autologous or human blood in an attempt to simulate xenotransplantation. About 14 hearts were studied after a Langendorff blood reperfusion: allografts with autologous blood (n = 7) or xenografts with human blood (n = 7). Blood samples were drawn from the coronary sinus to assess ischemia and OS. In xenografts, arrhythmias occurred more frequently (p < 0.01, left ventricular systolic pressure decreased more significantly (p < 0.05), thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances concentrations increased at 30 min (0.7 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; p < 0.05) while vitamin A levels decreased (p < 0.05). XT was associated with a significant increase in ischemic injury and OS production. OS might play an eminent role in hyperacute humoral rejection.

Clinical relevance of anti-HLA antibodies detected by flow-cytometry bead-based assays--single-center experience

The purpose of this study was to define the incidence, dynamics, and profiles of anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA-Abs) produced after kidney transplantation and their impact on graft outcome. A total of 72 first cadaver donor kidney recipients were prospectively monitored for the development of HLA-Abs using bead-based flow-cytometry assays (One Lambda FlowPRA tests). Sixteen recipients (22.2%) developed HLA-Abs after transplantation (class I, n = 7; class I+II, n = 6; class II, n = 3), in most cases (81.25%) within the first 2 weeks posttransplantation. A strong association between alloantibody presence and delayed graft function (Chi-square = 7.659, p < 0.01), acute rejection (Chi-square = 14.504, p < 0.001), chronic rejection (Chi-square = 12.84, p < 0.001), and graft loss (Chi-square = 20.283, p < 0.001) was found. Patients with higher alloantibody titers experienced acute rejections and even early graft loss, compared with those with lower titers for whom chronic rejections were more common. Immunologic complications occurred in recipients with both donor-specific and cross-reacting groups or non-donor-specific antibodies alone. A positive correlation (Pearson correlation, 0.245; p < 0.05) between HLA class I amino acid triplet incompatibility and alloantibody production was observed, mainly resulting from immunogenic triplotypes. Given the results obtained in this study, an alloantibody testing algorithm has been designed and implemented for routine monitoring and to define optimally the alloantibody reactivity in kidney transplant recipients.

C4d and C3d staining in biopsies of ABO- and HLA-incompatible renal allografts: correlation with histologic findings

Biopsies of ABO-incompatible and positive crossmatch (HLA-incompatible) renal allografts were retrospectively examined to compare results of C4d and C3d staining, and the correlation between such staining and histologic findings suggestive of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). A total of 75 biopsies (55 protocol, 17 for graft dysfunction, 3 for other indications) of 24 ABO-incompatible grafts and 244 biopsies (103 protocol, 129 for graft dysfunction, 12 for other indications) of 66 HLA-incompatible grafts were examined; all were stained for C4d and approximately 40% for C3d. In ABO-incompatible grafts, 80% of protocol biopsies and 59% performed for graft dysfunction showed C4d staining in peritubular capillaries (PTC); this staining was not correlated with neutrophil margination in PTC. In HLA-incompatible grafts, PTC C4d was present in 26% of protocol biopsies and 60% of biopsies for graft dysfunction; 92% of biopsies with >1+ (0-4+ scale), diffuse PTC C4d had > or =1+ margination and/or thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), compared with 12% of C4d-negative biopsies. C3d was somewhat more predictive of margination than C4d in ABO-incompatible, but not HLA-incompatible, grafts. In summary, while PTC C4d deposition indicates probable AMR in biopsies of HLA-incompatible grafts, including protocol biopsies, there is no histologic evidence that C4d deposition is correlated with injury in most ABO-incompatible grafts.

Effects of mycophenolate mofetil on donor-specific antibody formation in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a routinely used immunosuppressive agent that selectively blocks T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation. The present study was designed to investigate the effects of this drug on human leukocyte(HLA) antibody production in general and donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation in particular in 154 recipients of renal allografts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Renal allograft recipients were subdivided into three groups. Group 1 patients (n = 60) had received MMF since transplantation in combination with either cyclosporin A or tacrolimus and steroids. Group 2 patients (n = 29) had received an MMF-free immunosuppressive regimen initially followed by addition of MMF some time later. Group 3 patients (n = 65) had received no MMF. Cyclosporin A or tacrolimus in combination with azathioprine and/or steroids were used for immunosuppression. DSA were demonstrated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detection of panel-reactive antibodies of HLA class I and II specificity.

RESULTS

The HLA antibodies were found in 16.7%, 27.6% and 30.8% of transplant recipients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. DSA were found in 8.3%, 17.2% and 20.0%, and non-DSA in 10.0%, 20.7% and 24.6%, of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MMF reduces anti-HLA class I and II antibody production and consequently DSA production in renal allograft recipients. Our data indicate this effect to be more pronounced in patients given MMF immediately after transplantation than in those in whom MMF is introduced some time later. The presence of DSA in the serum of renal allograft recipients is associated with poorer graft function (higher serum creatinine and more rejection episodes).

Acute vascular rejection and accommodation: divergent outcomes of the humoral response to organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

The most difficult barrier to organ transplantation is humoral rejection, a condition initiated by binding of antibodies to blood vessels in the graft. Fortunately, humoral rejection is not the only outcome of antibody binding to the graft. In some cases, accommodation, a condition in which the graft does not undergo humoral injury despite the existence of humoral immunity directed against it, occurs and the graft remains seemingly inured. The mechanism underlying accommodation is uncertain, but changes in the function of antibodies, changes in the target antigen, and changes in the graft imparting resistance to injury have been implicated.

METHODS

Using the swine-to-baboon cardiac xenograft model, we asked which mechanism(s) may distinguish acute vascular rejection from accommodation.

RESULTS

In both acute vascular rejection and accommodation, antibodies were bound and complement activated in blood vessels of the graft. However, in acute vascular rejection, the full complement cascade was activated; while in accommodation, the complement cascade was interrupted, suggesting complement was inhibited in the latter condition. In acute vascular rejection, heparan sulfate and syndecan-4-phosphate, which can aid in complement control, were nearly absent, whereas in accommodation these were present in heightened amounts.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that control of complement may underlie accommodation, at least in part, and raise the possibility that this control and possibly other protective mechanisms could be exerted by heparan sulfate.

Development of Posttransplant Antidonor HLA Antibodies Is Associated with Acute Humoral Rejection and Early Graft Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine whether the production of posttransplant antibodies directed against donor HLA mismatches (donor specific antibody; DSA) is associated with renal allograft rejection and early graft dysfunction.

METHODS

Forty-nine adult renal allograft recipients with increased risk of rejection were enrolled during the period of October 2001 through May 2003 and were prospectively monitored for the development of anti-HLA antibodies.

RESULTS

Of 49 patients, eight (16.3 %) patients were diagnosed with acute humoral rejection (AHR) and 11/49 (22.4%) patients were diagnosed with acute cellular rejection (ACR). A strong association between pretransplant HLA sensitization and AHR was found (P=0.005). Of the eight patients diagnosed with AHR, the majority developed DSA before or concomitant with episodes of rejection (P<0.001). Only 3 of 41 patients (7.3%) without AHR developed DSA. The pathogenic role of alloantibodies was further substantiated by analyzing their association with graft function as measured by serum creatinine levels. The average serum creatinine after the third month posttransplantation in DSA producers was 2.24+/-1.01 mg/dL, while in non-DSA patients the average serum creatinine was 1.41+/-0.37 mg/dL (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals a strong association between the production of DSA, AHR, and early graft dysfunction. Our findings indicate that prospective monitoring for anti-HLA antibodies following transplantation is a useful test for the diagnosis and classification of AHR for identifying patients at risk of early graft dysfunction.

Pathways to acute humoral rejection

Acute humoral rejection, also known as acute vascular rejection, is a devastating condition of organ transplants and a major barrier to clinical application of organ xenotransplantation. Although initiation of acute humoral or vascular rejection is generally linked to the action of antibodies and complement on the graft, other factors such as ischemia, platelets, T cells, natural killer cells, and macrophages have also been implicated. Central to any understanding of the pathogenesis of acute humoral rejection, and to developing means of preventing it, is to know whether these factors injure the graft independently or through one or few pathways. We addressed this question by examining early events in a severe model of vascular rejection in which guinea pig hearts transplanted heterotopically into rats treated with cobra venom factor (CVF) develop disease over 72 hours. The early steps in acute vascular rejection were associated with expression of a set of inflammatory genes, which appeared to be controlled by availability of interleukin (IL)-1. Interruption of IL-1 signaling by IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) averted expression of these genes and early tissue changes, including coagulation and influx of inflammatory cells. These findings suggest IL-1 plays an important role in initiation of acute humoral rejection.

Plasmapheresis in C4d-positive Acute Humoral Rejection Following Kidney Transplantation: A Review of 4 Cases

Acute and chronic rejection after kidney transplantation has long been exclusively attributed to cellular and vascular mechanisms. Modern immunosuppressive therapy, therefore, addresses the cellular immune system. Rising experiences in kidney transplantation in the last few decades have revealed that some types of rejection are refractory to the conventional immunosuppressive treatment. Humoral rejection. which has previously been reported as a crucial factor in hyperacute rejection, is now suspected to play also an important role in acute and chronic rejection. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is characterized by immunohistochemical detection of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries. As shown for other antibody-mediated diseases, such as some autoimmune diseases, plasmapheresis has been suggested to be an efficient therapeutic approach in AHR. We present four patients with C4d-positive AHR in the early phase after kidney transplantation. In three of the four patients, humoral graft rejection was successfully treated by plasmapheresis. Graft function was significantly improved with a stable long-term outcome. One patient lost the graft. Although the number of patients with C4d-positive AHR treated by plasmapheresis is limited, plasma exchange appears to be an efficient and powerful therapeutic approach to control humoral rejection.

Complement C4d in graft capillaries -- the missing link in the recognition of humoral alloreactivity

Staining of C4d in graft capillaries has emerged as a useful method to detect antibody-mediated rejections in situ. Demonstration of capillary C4d has provided substantial clinical results and allows several conclusions: Antidonor antibodies (preformed or produced de novo) activate complement directly in the graft. Capillary C4d is present in about 30% of biopsies with acute and chronic rejections and separates rejections with a humoral component from 'pure' cell-mediated rejections. Recognition of humoral alloreactivity is important, since effective treatment is now available. Since capillary C4d can appear and disappear at any time post transplantation, every transplant biopsy should be tested. Capillary C4d is now incorporated in the 'Banff classification'. The incidence of C4d-positive cases will probably decline because of the 'routine' application of potent immunosuppressants, including mycophenolate mofetil, that can inhibit antibody production. Presensitization, however, will remain a potential threat to allografts.

Apoptosis and cellular activation in the pathogenesis of acute vascular rejection

Acute vascular or humoral rejection, a vexing outcome of organ transplantation, has been attributed by some to activation and by others to apoptosis of endothelial cells in the graft. We asked which of these processes causes acute vascular rejection by tracing the processes during the development of acute vascular rejection in porcine cardiac xenografts performed in baboons. Apoptosis, assayed by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL), expression of activated caspase-3, and proapoptotic genes Bax and Bcl-x(L), was not detected until acute vascular rejection was well advanced, and even then, apoptosis was largely confined to myocytes. Activation of the endothelium, as evidenced by expansion of rough endoplasmic reticulum and increased ribosomal antigen and phospho-p70 S6 kinase, occurred early in the course of acute vascular rejection and progressed through the disease process. These findings suggest that acute vascular rejection is caused by an active metabolic process and not by apoptosis in the endothelium.

Membrane attack complex contributes to destruction of vascular integrity in acute lung allograft rejection

The lung is known to be particularly susceptible to complement-mediated injury. Both C5a and the membrane attack complex (MAC), which is formed by the terminal components of complement (C5b-C9), can cause acute pulmonary distress in nontransplanted lungs. We used C6-deficient rats to investigate whether MAC causes injury to lung allografts. PVG.R8 lungs were transplanted orthotopically to MHC class I-incompatible PVG.1U recipients. Allografts from C6-sufficient (C6(+)) donors to C6(+) recipients were rejected with an intense vascular infiltration and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage 7 days after transplantation (n = 5). Ab and complement (C3d) deposition was accompanied by extensive vascular endothelial injury and intravascular release of von Willebrand factor. In contrast, lung allografts from C6-deficient (C6(-)) donors to C6(-) recipients survived 13-17 days (n = 5). In the absence of C6, perivascular mononuclear infiltrates of ED1(+) macrophages and CD8(+) T lymphocytes were present 7 days after transplantation, but vascular endothelial cells were quiescent, with minimal von Willebrand factor release and no evidence of alveolar hemorrhage or edema. Lung allografts were performed from C6(-) donors to C6(+) recipients (n = 5) and from C6(+) donors to C6(-) recipients (n = 5) to separate the effects of systemic and local C6 production. Lungs transplanted from C6(+) donors to C6(-) recipients had increased alveolar macrophages and capillary injury. C6 production by lung allografts was demonstrated at the mRNA and protein levels. These results demonstrate that MAC causes vascular injury in lung allografts and that the location of injury is dependent on the source of C6.

C4d staining of perioperative renal transplant biopsies

BACKGROUND

Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) has been shown to be a sensitive marker for antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Some studies also suggest that C4d in PTCs is specific for humoral rejection or, at least, for the presence of donor-specific antibodies. However, in other studies, PTC C4d deposits were noted in more than 40% of renal transplant biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and capillary C4d deposition in heart transplants may result from ischemic injury.

METHODS

To test the specificity of C4d staining as a marker for acute humoral rejection ACR in renal allografts, indirect immunofluorescence using a monoclonal anti-C4d antibody and a fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was performed on cryostat sections of 90 renal transplant biopsies, including 35 pairs of preimplantation and 1-hr postreperfusion biopsies of the same graft, postreperfusion biopsies of 12 additional grafts, and 8 positive controls (biopsies with known C4d-positive AHR). Eighteen grafts were cadaveric, 17 grafts were liviing-related, and 12 grafts were living-unrelated (excluding controls). Included in these grafts were 13 grafts that developed AHR 3 to 34 days posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Only 2 of 82 perioperative biopsies showed C4d staining in PTCs. Both perioperative biopsies were postreperfusion biopsies of grafts diagnosed with AHR 5 and 34 days posttransplantation, respectively, and, in each case, the recipient had been treated with plasmapheresis before transplantation because of a positive crossmatch (cytotoxic and flow cytometric) and continued to have a weakly positive flow crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In one biopsy, C4d staining was focal, and in the other biopsy, it was diffuse; in both biopsies, C4d staining was relatively mild (1+ on a 0-4+ scale). No C4d staining was noted on preimplantation biopsies of each graft. All biopsies that contained glomeruli showed linear capillary loop or blotchy mesangial staining, or both, which was similar in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. All positive controls showed diffuse C4d staining in PTCs.

CONCLUSIONS

C4d staining in PTCs may be seen as early as 1 hr posttransplantation in some recipients with low levels of antidonor antibodies. However, this was not observed as a feature of ischemic or ischemia-reperfusion injury in perioperative renal transplant biopsies, including those of cadaveric grafts with cold ischemia times of as long as 41 hr.

Capillary C4d deposition in kidney allografts: a specific marker of alloantibody-dependent graft injury

Capillary deposition of the complement split product C4d has been discussed as a marker for antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection. The relationship between C4d staining and posttransplant alloantibody detection remains to be thoroughly investigated, however. In this study, C4d staining in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and the incidence of alloantibody formation, as detected with sensitive techniques, were evaluated among a cohort of transplant recipients who had undergone biopsies and had not been selected for a specific histologic diagnosis. One hundred thirteen biopsies, obtained from 58 cadaveric kidney transplant recipients, were tested. Serum samples obtained at the time of biopsy were evaluated by flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) testing and FlowPRA (One Lambda, Inc., Canoga Park, CA) analysis of anti-HLA panel reactivity. Most biopsies with C4d deposits in PTC (C4d(PTC)(+), n = 21 of 24) were associated with positive posttransplant FCXM results (T and/or B cell FCXM) and/or > or =5% FlowPRA (anti-HLA class I and/or II) reactivity. Approximately 50% of the C4d(PTC)(-) biopsies were observed to be associated with donor-specific alloantibodies. Accordingly, high specificity (93%) but low sensitivity (31%) were calculated for capillary C4d staining (with FCXM testing as the standard method). For clinical evaluation, three patient groups were defined, i.e., a group of recipients with positive C4d staining in at least one allograft biopsy (C4d(PTC)(+), n = 16) and two C4d(PTC)(-) groups, which were discriminated on the basis of posttransplant FCXM results as C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) (n = 22) and C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(-) (n = 20) groups. Univariate analyses revealed significant differences between these groups with respect to serum creatinine levels at 12 mo [median, 2.83 mg/dl (interquartile range, 1.93 to 4.2 mg/dl) versus 1.78 mg/dl (1.47 to 2.24 mg/dl) versus 1.59 mg/dl (1.2 to 1.71 mg/dl), P < 0.001]. Of the five immunologic graft losses, four occurred in the C4d(PTC)(+) group and one occurred in the C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) group. In a multivariate analysis, C4d positivity was observed to have an independent predictive value for inferior 12-mo graft function (P = 0.02), whereas the observed moderate difference between C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(+) and C4d(PTC)(-)/FCXM(-) recipients did not achieve significance. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that positive C4d staining, which is an independent predictor of kidney graft dysfunction, represents a reliable specific marker for antibody-dependent graft injury.

B-Cell crossmatching and kidney allograft outcome in 9031 United States transplant recipients

The predictive power of a positive B-cell crossmatch remains controversial due to the presence of cofactors, such as sensitization and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch levels. UNOS OPTN/Scientific Registry data were analyzed on 9031 cadaveric kidney graft recipients who were B-cell crossmatched during 1994 and 1995 for graft outcome. This 2-year time period was chosen so that most US transplant recipients in this study would have had a similar regimen of immunosuppression consisting of prednisone, Sandimmune, and azathioprine The two patient groups that were analyzed were B-pos (n = 336) and B-neg (n = 8,695). All T-cell crossmatches were negative. Data analyzed included donor-recipient demographics, sensitization levels, B-cell crossmatch techniques, histocompatibility mismatching, graft rejection incidence, early graft loss, cause of graft failure, and statistical analyses (univariate and multivariate) in primary and repeat graft recipients. Significant factors in both crossmatch groups included pretransplant transfusions, peak and most recent class I PRA levels, a previous kidney graft, histocompatibility mismatching at HLA-A plus -B, urine in first 24 h, and rejection incidence between discharge and 6 months post-transplantation. Class II antibody specificities and panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels were not available from the UNOS database. Fifty-seven percent of 15,896 (1994-1995) transplant recipients (n 9031) were B-cell crossmatched, and 336 of 9031 recipients (3.7%) were transplanted with a B-pos crossmatch. Sixteen percent of B-pos recipients experienced early graft loss (< 6 months) compared with 11% of B-neg recipients (p < 0.001). Both primary and repeat grafts with B-pos crossmatches experienced an increase in rejection incidence (p = 0.023) and early graft loss (p < 0.001). In the sensitized (PRA > 10%) recipient subset (n = 2,789), both primary (n = 93) and regraft (n = 52) recipients with B-pos crossmatches had a higher incidence of early graft loss at 3 months, p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively. HLA-DR mismatch levels in both patient groups were not different (p = 0.109). There was a 68% increase in the odds of 3-month graft loss in B-pos versus B-neg recipients (multivariate logistic regression analysis p = 0.054, 95% confidence interval 0.99-2.85). In conclusion, a B-pos crossmatch in primary and regraft recipients, including a sensitized subset, is predictive of inferior kidney graft outcome.

Acute humoral renal allograft rejection

In kidney transplantation, it is well established that donor-specific antibodies can cause substantial graft injury. Hyperacute rejection, now virtually eliminated by routine pretransplant cytotoxic crossmatch testing, represents the prototype of humoral rejection. However, there is now increasing evidence that alloantibody-mediated immune reactions may also cause acute rejection. Acute humoral rejection, which is frequently associated with severe graft dysfunction and immunologic graft loss, represents a particular diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Reliable detection of antibody-mediated graft injury is required to govern the application of antihumoral therapeutic strategies. This review focuses on new approaches in the diagnosis and treatment of acute humoral rejection. Special attention is given to a novel diagnostic marker, the complement split product C4d.

C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: effective treatment by immunoadsorption

There is increasing evidence for an important pathogenetic role of alloantibodies in acute renal allograft rejection. Acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been reported to be associated with a poor transplant survival. Although treatment modalities for cellular rejection are fairly well established, the optimal treatment for AHR remains undefined. Ten of 352 kidney allograft recipients transplanted at the authors' institution between November 1998 and September 2000 were diagnosed as having AHR, supported by severe graft dysfunction, C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC), and accumulation of granulocytes in PTC. AHR was diagnosed 18.9 +/- 17.5 d posttransplantation. All patients were subjected to immunoadsorption (IA) with protein A (median number of treatment sessions, 9; range, 3 to 17). Seven recipients with additional signs of cellular rejection (according to the Banff classification) received also antithymocyte globulin. In nine of ten patients, AHR was associated with an increase in panel reactive antibody reactivity. A pathogenetic role of alloantibodies was further supported by a positive posttransplant cytotoxic crossmatch in all tested recipients (n = 4). In nine of ten recipients, renal function recovered after initiation of anti-humoral therapy. One patient lost his graft shortly after initiation of specific therapy. Another recipient with partial reversal of AHR returned to dialysis 8 mo after transplantation. Mean serum creatinine in functioning grafts was 2.2 +/- 1.2 mg/dl after the last IA session (n = 9) and 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dl after a follow-up of 14.2 +/- 7.1 mo (n = 8). In conclusion, this study suggests that AHR, characterized by severe graft dysfunction, C4d staining, and peritubular granulocytes, can be effectively treated by timely IA. In the majority of patients, IA treatment can restore excellent graft function over a prolonged time period.

Endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior kidney allograft outcome independently of cellular rejection

BACKGROUND

Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d has been suggested to be a valuable marker for humoral rejection. In this retrospective study we evaluated the clinical impact of C4d deposition in renal allografts with special emphasis on associations between C4d staining patterns and histological features of acute rejection.

METHODS

One hundred and two allograft biopsies obtained from 61 kidney transplants (1-532 days after transplantation; median 14 days) were examined by immunohistochemistry on routine paraffin sections using a novel anti-C4d polyclonal antibody (C4dpAb).

RESULTS

Fourty-two of 102 biopsies showed endothelial C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC). Histopathological analysis revealed a significantly lower frequency of positive C4d staining in biopsies with rather than in those without acute cellular rejection defined by the Banff grading schema (P<0.01). For clinical evaluation, patients were classified according to C4d staining in allografts (C4d(PTC) positive in at least one biopsy, n=31 vs C4d(PTC) negative in all biopsies, n=30). C4d(PTC) positive patients had significantly higher serum creatinine levels than C4d negative patients. Even in the absence of morphological evidence for rejection, differences in serum creatinine levels between C4d(PTC) positive and negative recipients were significant (6 months: 2.01+/-0.75 vs 1.41+/-0.27 mg/dl; 12 months: 1.95+/-0.60 vs 1.36+/- 0.34 mg/dl; 18 months: 1.98+/-0.50 vs 1.47+/-0.31 mg/dl; P<0.05). All patients with rejection resistant to conventional therapy (n=4) were in the C4d(PTC) positive subgroup. All recipients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) >50% (n=8) were C4d(PTC) positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior graft outcome. We provide evidence that this immunohistochemical finding and its clinical impact are not associated with morphological signs of cellular rejection.

Acute humoral rejection in renal allograft recipients: I. Incidence, serology and clinical characteristics

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection (AR) associated with de novo production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) is a clinicopathological entity that carries a poor prognosis (acute humoral rejection, AHR). The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of AHR in renal allograft recipients, and to further analyze the antibodies involved.

METHODS

During a 4-year period, 232 renal transplants (Tx) were performed at our institution. Assays for DSA included T and B cell cytotoxic and/or flow cytometric cross-matches and cytotoxic antibody screens (PRA). C4d complement staining was performed on frozen biopsy tissue.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients (35%) suffered at least one episode of AR within the first 3 months: 51 had steroid-insensitive AR whereas the remaining 30 had steroid-sensitive AR. No DSA were found in patients with steroid-sensitive AR. In contrast, circulating DSA were found in 19/51 patients (37%) with steroid-insensitive AR, and widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries were present in 18 of these 19 (95%). In at least three cases, antibodies were against donor HLA class II antigens. DSA were not found in the remaining 32 patients but C4d staining was positive in 2 of 32. The DSA/C4d positive (n=18) and DSA/C4d negative (n=30) groups differed in pre-Tx PRA levels, percentage of re-Tx patients, refractoriness to antilymphocyte therapy, and outcome. Plasmapheresis and tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil rescue reversed rejection in 9 of 10 recipients with refractory AHR.

CONCLUSION

More than one-third of the patients with steroid-insensitive AR had evidence of AHR, often resistant to antilymphocyte therapy. Most cases (95%) with DSA at the time of rejection had widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries, suggesting a pathogenic role of the circulating alloantibody. Combined DSA testing and C4d staining provides a useful approach for the early diagnosis of AHR, a condition that often necessitates a more intensive therapeutic rescue regimen.

Impact of humoral alloreactivity early after transplantation on the long-term survival of renal allografts

BACKGROUND

The contribution of humoral alloreactivity to the rejection of renal allografts is not well defined because humoral antigraft reactions are not easily detectable in transplant biopsies, and serial measurements of circulating allo-antibodies in the post-transplantation period are not routinely performed. We have developed diagnostic techniques that improve the assessment of humoral alloreactivity in vivo and in vitro.

METHODS

Humoral alloreactivity in transplant biopsies derived from 218 single kidney grafts was detected by assessing the deposition of complement fragment C4d in interstitial capillaries. Circulating alloantibodies were determined in corresponding serum samples by flow cytometry using lymphoblastoid cell lines of donor DR-type as target cells and by a conventional microcytotoxicity test. The impact of capillary C4d and other selected variables on renal graft survival was calculated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Capillary C4d, present in 46% of biopsies from first grafts and 72% of regrafts, is related to circulating alloantibodies. Grafts with capillary C4d have a markedly shorter survival than grafts without capillary C4d (50% graft survival, 4 vs. 8 years, P = 0.0001). Among several risk factors, capillary C4d is the strongest predictor of subsequent graft loss in a multivariate analysis (relative risk, 2.1, 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.1). Humoral alloreactivity detectable within six months after transplantation has a much stronger impact on graft survival than alloreactivity detected beyond this period.

CONCLUSIONS

Humoral alloreactivity, manifested by the capillary deposition of complement C4d in about 50% of biopsied renal grafts, exerts a strong impact on graft survival when it operates within six months after transplantation.

Role of humoral immune reactions as target for antirejection therapy in recipients of a spousal-donor kidney graft

Excellent graft outcome has been reported for spousal-donor kidney transplantation. In husband-to-wife transplantation, however, a tendency toward inferior graft survival has been described for recipients who were previously pregnant. In our series of spousal-kidney transplantations (nine transplantations; three female recipients), actual graft survival is 100% (median observation time, 339 days). Five patients experienced early allograft rejection. In four transplant recipients, rejection was easily reversible by conventional antirejection therapy. In a multiparous recipient, however, mild interstitial allograft rejection associated with early graft dysfunction was resistant to anticellular treatment (antilymphocyte antibody, tacrolimus rescue therapy). The particular finding of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in peritubular capillaries and the finding of diffuse capillary deposits of the complement split product, C4d, in a posttransplantation biopsy specimen suggested a role of antibody-mediated graft injury. Retrospective flow cytometry cross-matching showed the presence of preformed immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to HLA class I antigens that were not detectable by pretransplantation lymphocytotoxic cross-match testing or screening for panel reactive antibodies. After transplantation, however, complement-fixing antibodies, also presumably triggered by reexposure to spousal-donor HLA antigens, could be detected in the patient's serum. These findings suggested antibody-mediated allograft rejection and led to the initiation of immunoadsorption therapy (14 sessions) with staphylococcal protein A. Selective removal of recipient IgG resulted in complete reversal of graft dysfunction. Our findings suggest that in husband-to-wife transplantation, donor-specific antibodies, presumably triggered by previous pregnancies, might occasionally induce sustained allograft dysfunction. Thus, in this particular setting, a detailed immunologic and histopathologic work-up regarding antibody-mediated allograft dysfunction is warranted because immunoadsorption may be a highly effective treatment modality.

The application of flow cytometry to histocompatibility testing

Flow cytometry is a powerful technique that enables the sensitive and quantitative detection of both cellular antigens and bound biological moieties. This article reviews how flow cytometry is increasingly being used as histocompatibility laboratories for the analysis of antibody specificity and HLA antigen expression. A basic description of flow cytometry principles and standardisation is given, together with an outline of clinical application in the areas of pre-transplant cross-matching, antibody screening, post-transplant antibody monitoring and HLA-B27 detection. It is concluded that flow cytometry is a useful multi-parametric analytical tool, yielding clinical benefit especially in the identification of patients at risk of early transplant rejection.

Complement activation in acute humoral renal allograft rejection: diagnostic significance of C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries

The distinction between acute humoral rejection (AHR) and acute cellular rejection (ACR) in renal allografts is therapeutically important, but pathologically difficult. Since AHR is probably mediated by antibodies to the donor endothelium that activate the classical complement pathway, it was hypothesized that peritubular capillary C4d deposition might distinguish this group. Renal biopsies (n = 16) from 10 patients with AHR who had acute graft dysfunction, neutrophils in peritubular capillaries, and a concurrent positive cross-match were stained for C4d by immunofluorescence. Control biopsies for comparison showed ACR (n = 14), cyclosporin A toxicity (n = 6), or no abnormality (n = 4). Peribiopsy sera were tested for anti-donor HLA antibody. C4d deposited prominently and diffusely in the peritubular capillaries in all AHR biopsies (16 of 16). IgM and/or C3 were also present in 19 and 44%, respectively. With two-color immunofluorescence, C4d was localized in basement membranes (type IV collagen+) and in the endothelium (Ulex europaeus agglutinin-I+). In ACR, no more than trace C4d was found in peritubular capillaries (P < 0.0001 versus AHR), and no patient had anti-donor HLA antibodies (0 of 8); 27% had neutrophils in peritubular capillaries. One of six biopsies with cyclosporin A toxicity had similar C4d deposits, and circulating anti-donor class I antibody was detected. Grafts with AHR were lost (40%) more often than those with ACR (0%; P < 0.02). C4d in peritubular capillary walls distinguishes AHR from ACR, is more specific and sensitive than traditional criteria, and is a potentially valuable adjunct in the diagnosis of graft dysfunction.

HLA class I and class II antibodies: monitoring before and after kidney transplantation and their clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

In search of an alternative screening technique, we compared complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) with PRA-STAT, a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

METHODS

A total of 188 pre- and posttransplant sera from 50 renal allograft recipients were tested with both methods.

RESULTS

A significant correlation was found between both methods. Discrepant results could be explained by the fact that PRA-STAT detects both HLA class I and II antibodies (while CDC with peripheral blood lymphocytes as target cell detects mainly HLA class I reactivity), by the presence of IgM antibodies (which are not detected by the IgG-specific ELISA test), and by CDC "false-positive" results due to antibody rejection treatment. The clinical relevance of antibodies detected by PRA-STAT is suggested by the following. (a) In eight patients, donor-specific HLA antibodies detected by PRA-STAT (but not seen by CDC) resulted in severe rejection episodes, which led to graft loss in four cases. In all but one patient, antibodies were directed against class II or mixtures of class I and H antigens. Six patients with complications were shown to have developed de novo antibodies against DQ incompatibilities. (b) Half of the patients with a positive ELISA test at the moment of crossmatch experienced complications. Such patients are at a threefold higher risk of suffering from rejection episodes and/or graft loss than patients who are not sensitized (P<0.05, Fisher exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Because PRA-STAT is very reproducible, detects both HLA class I and II antibodies, and is not influenced by rejection therapy, we consider it an additional tool for pre- and posttransplant monitoring of kidney allograft recipients.

Flow cross-matching identifies patients at risk for postoperative elaboration of cytotoxic antibodies

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic IgG against class I antigens can contribute to renal dysfunction or failure after transplantation. However, the clinical relevance of IgG measured by flow cytometric cross-matching is controversial. This study correlated pre- and postoperative flow reactivity with clinical outcome among renal transplant patients with negative preoperative cytotoxic cross-matches.

METHODS

Nonsensitized primary renal allograft patients (n = 157) with negative preoperative cytotoxic cross-matches (complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assays) were stratified on the basis of IgG reactivity measured by flow cytometric cross-matching (FCXM) as FCXM negative (Neg) or positive against class I (T-pos FCXM) or class II (B-pos FCXM) antigens. The groups were compared in terms of frequency of early rejection and 1-year graft survival.

RESULTS

Patient distribution was 67% Neg, 14% T-pos FCXM, 14% B-pos FCXM, and 5% IgM FCXM. The incidence of early rejection was 25+/-3% for Neg and 51+/-3% for T- and B-pos FCXM (P < 0.05). One-year graft survival for Neg versus T-pos and B-pos FCXM was 97+/-3% versus 44+/-10% (P < 0.05) and 77+/-5% (P = 0.06), respectively. Rejections requiring plasmapheresis were found only among patients with T-pos FCXM. Among 29 patients, FCXM and complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity assays were performed 10+/-2 and 28+/-4 days after transplantation. Pre- and posttransplant antibody levels were relatively unchanged among Neg and B-pos FCXM patient groups. In contrast, patients with T-pos FCXM produced cytotoxic IgG against class I after transplantation, which may have contributed to the severe graft dysfunction experienced by this group.

CONCLUSIONS

FCXM is a useful tool to stratify primary renal transplant candidates in terms of potential risk for severe rejection. Furthermore, demonstration of preoperative flow reactivity against class I may identify a subgroup of patients at risk for early elaboration of cytotoxic alloantibody.

The alloimmunized patient: monitoring and therapeutics

The sensitization of renal transplant patients in the form of antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies often constitutes significant risk to allograft function. Testing for these antibodies is done before, at the time of, and after renal transplantation. Correct interpretation of the results necessitates an understanding of the principles of the tests and of the clinical factors in the patients, especially those receiving another transplant. Treatment remains difficult, although preliminary trials with intravenous gamma globulin have shown promising results in some patients.