Efficacy of tacrolimus as rescue therapy for chronic rejection in orthotopic liver transplantation: a report of the U.S. Multicenter Liver Study Group

Rejection in Liver Transplantation Recipients

Rejection following liver transplantation continues to impact transplant recipients although rates have decreased over time with advances in immunosuppression management. The diagnosis of rejection remains challenging with liver biopsy remaining the reference standard for diagnosis. Proper classification of rejection type and severity is imperative as this guides management and ultimately graft preservation. Future areas of promise include non-invasive testing for detection of rejection to reduce the morbidity associated with invasive testing and further advances in immunosuppression management to reduce toxicities associated with immunosuppression while minimizing rejection related morbidity.

The New Challenge in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of liver allograft transplantation was considered as anecdotal for many decades. However recently, AMR has gained clinical awareness as a potential cause of chronic liver injury, leading to liver allograft fibrosis and eventual graft failure. (1) Methods: Literature on chronic AMR (cAMR) in pediatric post-liver transplant patients was reviewed for epidemiologic data, physiopathology, diagnosis, and treatment approaches. (2) Results: Accurate incidence of cAMR in pediatric liver transplantation remains unknown. Diagnostic criteria of cAMR were suggested by the Banff Working Group in 2016 and are based on standardized histopathological findings, C4d staining pattern, associated with the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Physio-pathological mechanisms are not clear for the technically difficult-to-obtain animal models reproducing cAMR. Treatment protocols are not established, being limited to case reports and case series, based on experience in ABO incompatible transplantation and kidney transplantation. Immunosuppression compliance with adequate dose adjustment may prevent cAMR. Conversion of Cyclosporine to Tacrolimus may improve pathological findings if treated in early phase. The association of steroids, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and mTOR inhibitors have shown some synergistic effects. Second-line treatments such as intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasma exchange may decrease antibody titers based on ABO incompatible transplant protocols. The use of anti-CD20 (Rituximab) and proteasome inhibitors (Bortezomib) is controversial due to the lack of qualified studies. Therefore, multicenter randomized trials are needed to establish the best therapeutic strategy. In refractory cases, re-transplantation is the only treatment for allograft failure. (3) Conclusions: This literature review collects recent clinical, histopathological, and therapeutical advances of cAMR in liver allograft transplantation of pediatric patients. There are many physio-pathological aspects of cAMR to be clarified. Further efforts with multicenter prospective protocols to manage patients with cAMR are needed to improve its outcome.

Current state of clinical trials regarding liver transplant rejection

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant (LT) is the second most common transplant intervention. The rate of acute cellular rejection (ACR) is 15-25% after LT, while being higher in chronic rejection (CR). Clinical trials had a major role in getting more potent and selective immunosuppressive medications. Our study plays an important role by evaluating and tracking clinical trials related to liver transplant rejection, focusing on interventional therapeutic trials.

METHODS

On October 28, we searched Clinicaltrials.gov for interventional clinical trials related to liver transplant rejection. A total of 27 clinical trials included in this study. Characteristics on each trial were collected, and availability of linked publications was searched using Medline/PubMed and Embase/Scopus. Content of publications was reviewed and main findings were summarized.

RESULTS

Majority of trials were completed (15 out of 27). Eleven trials had between 11 and 50 participants, and 10 had above 100. The study duration was between 1 and 4 years for the majority of trials (16 trials), with an average of 3.77 years. Most of the trials were done in Europe/UK/Russia (n = 12). The results were provided in 9 trials but published in 4, showing the possible tolerogenic efficacy of MSC in liver transplantation, increased success of immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal after sirolimus addition, efficacy of Alemtuzumab, normal graft function and stability within 1 year of immunosuppression withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed a low number of trials, lack of variety in location and low publishing rates. The focus of trials was mainly towards side effects and safety of immunosuppressants, and their withdrawal. These trials reached results that must be built on to reach definitive guidelines and treatment strategies. This highlights the need for better management of human and financial resources, in order to reach new and more effective therapeutic strategies, leading to the decrease in rate of LTR.

Acute and Chronic Rejection After Liver Transplantation: What A Clinician Needs to Know

While antibody mediated hyper-acute vasculitic rejection is rare in liver transplant recipients, acute and chronic rejection have clinical significance. The liver allograft behaves differently to other solid organ transplants as acute rejection generally does not impair graft survival and chronic rejection (CR) is uncommon. The incidence of acute and chronic rejection has declined in current era due to improved immunosuppressive regimens. Acute rejection generally improves with steroid boluses and steroid resistant rejection is uncommon. CR may improve with escalation of immunosuppression or may result in irreversible loss of graft function leading to retransplantation or death. The current review discusses diagnosis and management of acute and chronic liver allograft rejection.

Antibody-mediated rejection: what is the clinical relevance?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review outlines the diagnosis, clinical implications, and treatment strategies for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

RECENT FINDINGS

A combination of clinical work-up, histopathology, C4d staining, and donor-specific antibody (DSA) should be used to diagnose AMR. The differential diagnosis for idiopathic fibrosis now includes chronic AMR. Characterization of pathogenic DSA continues to progress. De-novo and persistent DSA, particularly of the IgG3 subtype, are associated with inferior long-term outcomes.The liver allograft may confer long-term immunologic benefits to the kidney allograft after simultaneous liver-kidney transplant.The more widespread use of rituximab has improved outcomes in ABO-incompatible OLT.Although larger long-term studies of treatment options are needed, compliance with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and transfusion minimization are agreed upon preventive strategies.

SUMMARY

AMR has evolved into an established pathology in OLT recipients. Acute AMR may lead to early graft loss whereas chronic AMR results in progressive fibrosis if unrecognized. DSAs, likely in the setting of predisposing environmental factors, appear to play a role in T cell-mediated rejection and long-term graft outcomes.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Liver Transplant

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in liver transplants is a field in its infancy compared with its allograft cohorts of the kidney and lung. Acute AMR is diagnosed based on specific clinical and histopathologic criteria: serum donor specific antibodies, C4d staining, histopathologic findings on liver biopsy, and exclusion of other entities. In contrast, the histologic features of chronic AMR are not as specific and it is a more challenging diagnosis to make. Treatments of acute and chronic AMR include some combination of steroids, immune-modulating agents, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasmapheresis, and proteasome inhibitors.

Prevention and treatment of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and the role of the 'two-hit hypothesis'

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review outlines the diagnosis, prevention strategies, and possible treatment options for acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although rare, severe acute AMR (aAMR) usually occurs in patients with high mean fluorescence intensity despite serial dilutions or high-titer preformed class I donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA). The diagnosis is suspected when allograft dysfunction occurs with DSA, diffuse C4d staining, and a microvascular injury, and may be aided by the aAMR score. However, the incidence of and treatment approach to combined T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) with DSA present and some but not all features of AMR is yet to be determined. Chronic liver allograft AMR is characterized by low-grade chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis with DSA, the chronic AMR (cAMR) score may facilitate diagnosis. The 'two-hit' hypothesis, whereby a coexistent insult upregulates human leukocyte antigen class II target antigens on the microvascular endothelium, may explain why suboptimal donors with lower sensitization levels might suffer from acute AMR and those with chronic complications (e.g., recurrent original disease) might be more susceptible to chronic AMR. Although treatment algorithms are needed, prevention is preferable and at a minimum includes transfusion minimization, and medication adherence.

SUMMARY

Severe acute AMR is rare but diagnosable, and there is need to determine the incidence of and optimal therapy for less severe combined AMR and TCMR. Chronic AMR is likely more common and of significant relevance to long-term allograft survival improvement. The two-hit hypothesis may help to explain the rarity of both findings and shed insight onto future prevention and treatment strategies.

Proposed Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Liver Allografts

Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) can cause acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in all solid organ allografts. However, long-term outcome in patients with posttransplant DSA needs further study. We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected paired serum, tissue, and data on 45 matched DSA- positive [DSA+; mean florescence intensity (MFI) ≥10,000] and -negative (DSA-) recipients of a primary liver-only allograft from January 2000 to April 2009. Blinded histopathologic evaluation demonstrated that DSA+ versus DSA- patients were more likely to have subtle inflammation and unique patterns of fibrosis, despite normal or near-normal liver function tests. Stepwise multivariable modeling developed a score (putatively named the chronic AMR [cAMR] score) that included interface activity, lobular inflammation, portal tract collagenization, portal venopathy, sinusoidal fibrosis, and hepatitis C virus status. The score was developed (c = 0.811) and cross-validated (c = 0.704) to predict allograft failure. Two cutoffs were employed to optimize sensitivity and specificity (80% each); a value >27.5 predicted 50% 10-year allograft failure. We propose chronic AMR as a potential new entity defined by (1) a high cAMR score, (2) DSA, and (3) elimination of other potential causes of a similar injury pattern. In conclusion, cAMR score calculation identified liver allograft recipients with DSA at highest risk for allograft loss, although independent validation is needed.

Histological and Clinicopathological Evaluation of Liver Allograft Biopsy: An Initial Experience of Fifty Six Biopsies

INTRODUCTION

Liver biopsy is gold standard for diagnosis of allograft dysfunction.

AIM

The aim of study was to evaluate liver allograft biopsies performed for graft dysfunction, study the pattern of injury and intensity, and timeline of occurrence of graft dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study was carried out of 56 liver allograft biopsies and their histological findings with clinical presentation were correlated. Totally 56 needle liver allograft biopsies from January 1210 to July 2014, obtained from 35 patients were studied for histological and clinicopathological evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53.2±5.48 years. The most common original disease was alcoholic cirrhosis. The most common histological lesion was acute cellular rejection (ACR) in 31 (55.36%) biopsies followed by preservation-reperfusion injury (PRI) in 10 (17.86%) biopsies and drug toxicity in 8 (14.29%) biopsies. Chronic rejection was reported in 2 (3.57%) and recurrence of HCV in 3 (5.36%). Ischemic coagulative necrosis and acute cholangitis were seen in 1 (1.79 %) case each.

CONCLUSION

Alcoholic cirrhosis was the most common etiology for end stage liver disease. ACR and PRI were the major complications in liver allograft biopsies at our centre.

One thousand consecutive primary liver transplants under tacrolimus immunosuppression: a 17- to 20-year longitudinal follow-up

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The aim of this study is to examine its long-term efficacy and safety.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One thousand consecutive primary OLTs performed between August 1989 and December 1992 and maintained under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression were followed up until January 2009. Patient and graft survivals with corresponding causes of death and retransplantation, maintenance immunosuppression, and adverse effects were examined. The study population includes 600 males and 400 females comprising 166 children, 630 adults, and 204 seniors. The mean follow-up was 17.83 (range, 16.1-19.50) years. The overall 20-year actuarial patient and graft survivals were 35.8% and 32.6%, respectively. At the last follow-up, 442 patients were alive; 133 (77.1%) children, 265 (34.5%) adults, and 44 (16.1%) seniors (P=0.0001). After the first post-OLT year, cardiopulmonary events, recurrence of primary disease, and malignancy were the main causes of death. Overall, 183 recipients underwent retransplants; mainly for primary nonfunction, hepatic artery thrombosis, and recurrent primary disease, 180 required dialysis, and 45 underwent kidney transplant. A total of 97.7% of the survivors were on tacrolimus and 26.2% were also receiving adjunctive immunosuppressants at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall 20-year actuarial patient and graft survivals were 35.8% and 32.6%, respectively, with significantly better survival among children. Age-related complications, recurrence of primary disease, and malignancy were the major causes of late graft loss. Graft loss related to immunologic reasons was rare. The prevention of recurrent disease and newer immunosuppressive regimen will further improve these results.

Chronic rejection of the liver: the role of immunosuppression

Liver transplantation is now widely recognised as an effective treatment option for patients with advanced liver disease. Many units now achieve greater than 85% survival at 1 year, with the majority of patients having a high quality of life. The maintenance of a high quality of life requires careful clinical management to ensure that the continued maintenance of excellent liver graft function is not achieved at the expense of immunosuppressive drug complications or morbidity. Acute liver rejection will occur in between 30 to 45% of patients, although with modern immunosuppressive protocols, usually combining one of the calcineurin agents, either cyclosporin or tacrolimus, with both azathioprine and corticosteroids (prednisolone) ensures that relatively few grafts are lost from severe acute rejection. While the incidence and severity of acute rejection may be one factor in raising the risk of chronic rejection, it may not be the principal one in many patients. It is important to recognise that the frequency of rejection also varies with the primary underlying liver disease, with patients with hepatitis B or alcoholic liver disease having relatively low rejection rates, compared with patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), which range between 20 to 70%. Chronic rejection will account for some 5% of grafts lost in the first 3 to 5 years. Indeed, there is some evidence that the incidence of chronic rejection is actually declining over the past few years. While the reason for this apparent decline is uncertain, and it could relate to better immunosuppression management, or more likely to the growing recognition that chronic graft dysfunction may be due to recurrent liver disease, such as autoimmune hepatitis, PBC, PSC, or recurrent hepatitis C. The differentiation of recurrent primary liver disease from chronic rejection can prove to be very difficult in clinical practice. Thus, the clinician must carefully monitor liver and graft function, evaluate any biochemical changes, and try to reach a clear diagnosis before considering any modification of immunosuppressive schedules.

Long term management of liver transplant rejection in children

The current management of hepatic allograft rejection after liver transplantation in children requires effective baseline immunosuppression to prevent rejection and rapid diagnosis and treatment to manage acute rejection episodes. The subsequent impact on chronic rejection is dependent on the combination of adequate prevention and the treatment of acute rejection. Tacrolimus is a macrolide lactone that inhibits the signal transduction of interleukin-2 (IL-2) via calcineurin inhibition. Introduced in 1989, tacrolimus was first used in the salvage of refractory acute or chronic rejection under cyclosporin or to rescue patients with significant cyclosporin-related complications. The majority of paediatric transplant centres use a combination of steroids with tacrolimus as a basic immunosuppressant regimen following paediatric liver transplantation. This combination has allowed the acute cellular rejection-free rate to increase to between 30 and 60%, while lowering the rate of refractory rejection to less than 5%. Corticosteroid-resistant rejection is commonly treated with monoclonal (muromonab CD3) or polyclonal preparations. Although most episodes of acute cellular rejection occur during the first 6 weeks after liver transplant, the appearance of late acute liver allograft rejection must raise the question of noncompliance, especially in the adolescent population. Chronic rejection is becoming increasingly rare under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Tacrolimus is effective in reversing refractory acute cellular rejection or early chronic rejection in patients initially treated with cyclosporin-based regimens. Patients with a history of noncompliance as well as children with autoimmune liver disease are at risk of chronic rejection. Retransplantation therapy for chronic rejection has, fortunately, become more rare in the tacrolimus era with only 3% of retransplants being performed for this indication. Newer immunosuppressive agents are further modifying the long term management of liver allograft rejection. These include mycophenolate mofetil, rapamycin and IL-2 antibodies such as daclizumab. The development of these agents is allowing patient-specific immunosuppressive management to minimise rejection as well as the complications related to immunosuppression.

Long-term results of percutaneous bilioenteric anastomotic stricture treatment in liver-transplanted children

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid- and long-term results of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) and biliary drainage in children with isolated bilioenteric anastomotic stenosis (BAS) after pediatric liver transplantation. Sixty-four children underwent PTC from March 1993 to May 2008. Nineteen cholangiograms were normal; 10 showed intrahepatic biliary stenosis and BAS, and 35 showed isolated BAS. Cadaveric grafts were used in 19 and living donor grafts in 16 patients. Four patients received a whole liver, and 31 patients received a left lobe or left lateral segment. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in all patients. Indication for PTC was based on clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic findings. In patients with isolated BAS, dilation and biliary catheter placement, with changes every 2 months, were performed. Patients were separated into 4 groups according to number of treatment sessions required. The drainage catheter was removed if cholangiogram showed no significant residual stenosis and normal biliary emptying time after a minimum of 6 months. The relationship between risk factors (recipient's weight <10 kg, previous exposure to Cytomegalovirus, donor-recipient sex and weight relations, autoimmune disease as indication for transplantion, previous Kasai's surgery, use of reduced liver grafts, chronic or acute rejection occurrence) and treatment was evaluated. Before PTC, fever was observed in 46%, biliary dilation in 23%, increased bilirubin in 57%, and increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) in 100% of patients. In the group with BAS, 24 of 35 (69%) patients had histopathologic findings of cholestasis as did 9 of 19 (47%) patients in the group with normal PTC. Of the 35 patients, 23 (65.7%) needed 1 (group I), 7 needed 2 (group II), 4 needed 3 (group III), and 1 needed 4 treatment sessions (group IV). The best results were observed after 1 treatment session, and the mean duration of catheter placement and replacement was 10 months. The primary patency rate was 61.2%, and the recurrence rate was 34.3% (group I). Seven patients (7 of 35; 20%) had their stricture treated with a second treatment session (group II). The average drainage time in group II was 24 months. During a period >20 months, 4 patients (4 of 35; 11.4%) required 1 additional treatment session (group III), and 1 patient (1 of 35; 2.9%) had a catheter placed at the end of the study period (group IV). Drainage time in group I was significantly shorter than those in groups II, III, and IV (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant relation between therapeutic response and the selected risk factors (p > 0.05). The majority of complications, such as catheter displacement and leakage, were classified as minor; however, 2 patients (5.7%) with hemobilia were noted. Complications increased according to the need for reintervention. In conclusion, balloon dilation and percutaneous drainage placement is safe and effective, and it has long-term patency for children with BAS after liver transplantation. Because of prolonged treatment time, reintervention may be necessary, thereby increasing the complication rate. Balloon dilation and percutaneous drainage placement should be considered as the first treatment option because of its minimally invasive nature.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in liver transplant recipients

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSs) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS: Between November 1996 and December 2005, 10 patients with severe recurrent hepatitis C virus infection (n = 4), ductopenic rejection (n = 5) or portal vein thrombosis (n = 1) were included in this analysis. Eleven TIPSs (one patient underwent two TIPS procedures) were placed for management of therapy-refractory ascites (n = 7), hydrothorax (n = 2) or bleeding from colonic varices (n = 1). The median time interval between LT and TIPS placement was 15 (4-158) mo.

RESULTS: TIPS placement was successful in all patients. The mean portosystemic pressure gradient was reduced from 12.5 to 8.7 mmHg. Complete and partial remission could be achieved in 43% and 29% of patients with ascites. Both patients with hydrothorax did not respond to TIPS. No recurrent bleeding was seen in the patient with colonic varices. Nine of 10 patients died during the study period. Only one of two patients, who underwent retransplantation after the TIPS procedure, survived. The median survival period after TIPS placement was 3.3 (range 0.4-20) mo. The majority of patients died from sepsis with multiorgan failure.

CONCLUSION: Indications for TIPS and technical performance in LT patients correspond to those in non-transplanted patients. At least partial control of therapy-refractory ascites and variceal bleeding could be achieved in most patients. Nevertheless, survival rates were disappointing, most probably because of the advanced stages of liver disease at the time of TIPS placement and the high risk of sepsis as a consequence of immunosuppression.

Diagnosis and management of allograft failure

The article focuses on diagnosis and management of allograft failure in four main categories: (1) ischemic-reperfusion injury (primary nonfunction), (2) technical complications (hepatic artery and portal vein thrombosis), (3) chronic rejection, and (4) recurrent disease. It also discusses the complex problems involved in retransplantation for allograft failure.

Sampling Times for Monitoring Tacrolimus in Stable Adult Liver Transplant Recipients

The aim of this study was to determine the most informative sampling time(s) providing a precise prediction of tacrolimus area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Fifty-four concentration-time profiles of tacrolimus from 31 adult liver transplant recipients were analyzed. Each profile contained 5 tacrolimus whole-blood concentrations (predose and 1, 2, 4, and 6 or 8 hours postdose), measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The concentration at 6 hours was interpolated for each profile, and 54 values of AUC(0-6) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule. The best sampling times were then determined using limited sampling strategies and sensitivity analysis. Linear mixed-effects modeling was performed to estimate regression coefficients of equations incorporating each concentration-time point (C0, C1, C2, C4, interpolated C5, and interpolated C6) as a predictor of AUC(0-6). Predictive performance was evaluated by assessment of the mean error (ME) and root mean square error (RMSE). Limited sampling strategy (LSS) equations with C2, C4, and C5 provided similar results for prediction of AUC(0-6) (R2 = 0.869, 0.844, and 0.832, respectively). These 3 time points were superior to C0 in the prediction of AUC. The ME was similar for all time points; the RMSE was smallest for C2, C4, and C5. The highest sensitivity index was determined to be 4.9 hours postdose at steady state, suggesting that this time point provides the most information about the AUC(0-12). The results from limited sampling strategies and sensitivity analysis supported the use of a single blood sample at 5 hours postdose as a predictor of both AUC(0-6) and AUC(0-12). A jackknife procedure was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model, and this demonstrated that collecting a sample at 5 hours after dosing could be considered as the optimal sampling time for predicting AUC(0-6).

Role of tacrolimus in the evolution of liver transplantation

Once regarded as a last-resort therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, liver transplantation has become a viable therapeutic option because of sweeping improvements in surgical techniques and the development of more powerful immunosuppressive agents. The addition of tacrolimus to the immunosuppression regimen represents a highly potent therapy and a powerful defense against acute rejection. In the decade since tacrolimus was approved for use in the United States, it has become a widely used immunosuppressant in the field of liver transplantation.

Arteriopathy in chronic allograft rejection in liver transplantation

Chronic rejection is an important cause of liver allograft failures. The allograft undergoing chronic rejection shows affected large- and medium-sized muscular arteries with homing of foamy macrophages and enlargement of the intimal area. The objective of this study was to elucidate the pathogenesis of the intimal lesion that causes obliterative arteriopathy by identifying the origin of the foamy macrophages and mesenchymal cells present in the intimal area. Nine allografted livers (6 male and 3 female patients) from sex-mismatched donors undergoing chronic rejection were studied by combined staining of the macrophages or the mesenchymal cells in the intimal area with immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization using a probe for the human Y chromosome. By using the specimens from female donor allografts transplanted to male recipients, it was found that 62 +/- 11% of CD68+ foamy macrophages and 71 +/- 4% of smooth muscle actin-positive mesenchymal cells in the intimal lesions and a few interstitial myofibroblasts were positive for the Y chromosome probe. This indicated that they were derived from the recipients. In conclusion, the thickening intimal lesion seen in obliterative vasculopathy in liver allografts consists of the foamy macrophages and mesenchymal cells of recipient origin. These circulating recipient cells migrated to the areas in advance of remodeling arteries.

Inhibitors of Calcineurin

Before the early 1980s, patient and allograft survival for solid organ transplant recipients was dismal. By 1983, the first calcineurin blocker, cyclosporine (Sandimmun), had been introduced, and outcomes were dramatically improved. However, cyclosporine macroemulsion had suboptimal pharmacokinetics, significant drug interactions, and several adverse effects, including nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Recent advances with cyclosporine include the introduction of modified dosage formulations: Neoral, a microemulsion, and several generic microemulsion products. The potent second-generation calcineurin blocker tacrolimus (Prograf) was introduced in 1994 and has become the drug of choice for several types of transplant recipients. Although tacrolimus has improved pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drugmonitoring parameters, it has adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and diabetes. Thus, current immunosuppressive regimens implementing calcineurin blockers often involve additional immunosuppressive agents to “spare” the use of these agents, minimizing their adverse effects. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical use, therapeutic drug monitoring, drug interactions, adverse effects, and dosing of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in solid organ transplant recipients.

Use of tacrolimus in rescue therapy of acute and chronic rejection in liver transplantation

PURPOSE

To study the indications and results of tacrolimus as rescue therapy for acute cellular or chronic rejection in liver transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen liver transplant recipients who underwent rescue therapy with tacrolimus between March 1995 and August 1999 were retrospectively studied. The treatment indication, patients, and graft situation were recorded as of October 31st, 1999. The response to tacrolimus was defined as patient survival with a functional graft and histological reversal of acute cellular, or for chronic rejection, bilirubin serum levels decreasing to up to twice the upper normal limit.

RESULTS

Fourteen cases (77.8%) presented a good response. The response rate for the different indications was: (1) acute cellular + sepsis - 0/1 case; (2) recurrent acute cellular - 1/1 case; (3) OKT3-resistant acute cellular - 2/2 cases; (4) steroid-resistant acute cellular + active viral infection - 3/3 cases; (5) chronic rejection - 8/11 cases (72.7% response rate). The 4 patients who did not respond died.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus rescue therapy was successful in most cases of acute cellular and chronic rejection in liver transplantation.

The absence of chronic rejection in pediatric primary liver transplant patients who are maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression: a long-term analysis

BACKGROUND

Although the outcome of liver transplantation has improved significantly during the past two decades, graft loss caused by chronic rejection after liver transplantation still occurs in 2% to 20% of recipients. The overall incidence of chronic rejection is also reported to be low in adult recipients, and risk factors have been identified. Chronic rejection is associated with the inability to maintain baseline immunosuppression. Additionally, the diagnoses of primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus, common indications for liver transplantation in adults, are associated with a higher incidence of chronic rejection. Fortunately, these diagnoses are rarely seen in children. Little is known about chronic rejection in long-term pediatric liver transplant survivors. The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection in long-term survivors of primary pediatric liver transplantation under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

METHODS

From October 1989 to December 1992, 166 children (boys=95, girls=71; mean age=5.0+/-2.9 years) received a primary liver transplant. These patients were followed until March 2000 with a mean follow-up of 9+/-0.8 (range, 7.4-10.4) years. All liver biopsy specimens and explanted grafts were evaluated for evidence of chronic rejection using the International Banff Criteria.

RESULTS

The mortality rate during the follow-up period was 15% (n=25). Retransplantation was required in 11% (n=18) of recipients. Actuarial patient and graft survival rates at 10 years were 84.9% and 80.1%, respectively. There were 535 liver biopsy samples available for evaluation, including the 18 explanted allografts. Biopsy specimens of three other functioning allografts showed evidence of chronic rejection. Immunosuppression had been discontinued or drastically reduced in these recipients because of life-threatening infections, noncompliance, or both. On restoring baseline immunosuppression, all three children had normalized liver function and the allografts were maintained; the liver transplant patients who are alive currently have normal liver functions.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that chronic rejection does not occur in pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, provided baseline immunosuppression is maintained.

Effects of tacrolimus on ischemia-reperfusion injury

In addition to efficacious immunosuppression for the benefit of organ transplantation, tacrolimus has diverse actions that result in amelioration of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Knowledge is accumulating rapidly on the mechanisms through which tacrolimus exerts these cytoprotective effects, including alterations in microcirculation, free radical metabolism, calcium-activated pathways, inflammatory cascades, mitochondrial stability, apoptosis, stress-response proteins, and tissue recovery. Within the nucleus, actions mediating the effects of tacrolimus appear to be dominantly influenced by interactions with the transcription factor, nuclear factor-kappaB. Because tacrolimus is a cornerstone agent in immunosuppression regimens throughout the world and knowledge of its cellular mechanisms is evolving, it is important to update the clinical literature with this information. We reviewed the published literature with intent to portray the interactions of tacrolimus in the intricate cellular mechanisms initiated by ischemia and reperfusion.

Pediatric liver transplantation. A single center experience spanning 20 years

BACKGROUND

Survival after liver transplantation has improved significantly over the last decade with pediatric recipients faring better than adults. The 20-year experience of pediatric liver transplantation at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh is reported in terms of patient survival; graft survival in relation to age, gender, and immunosuppressive protocols; causes of death; and indications for retransplantation.

METHOD

From March 1981 to April 1998, 808 children received liver transplants at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh. All patients were followed until March 2001, with a mean follow-up of 12.2+/-3.9 years (median=12.6; range=2.9-20). There were 405 female (50.2%) and 403 male (49.8%) pediatric recipients. Mean age at transplant was 5.3+/-4.9 years (mean=3.3; range 0.04-17.95), with 285 children (25.3%) being less than 2 years of age at transplant. Cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppression was used before November 1989 in 482 children (50.7%), and the subsequent 326 recipients (40.3%) were treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Actuarial survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier statistical method. Differences in survival were calculated by log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

Overall patient survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 77.1%, 72.6%, 69.4%, 65.8%, and 64.4%, respectively. There was no difference in survival for male or female patients at any time point. At up to 10 years posttransplant, the survival for children greater than 2 years of age (79.5%, 75.7%, and 71.6% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) was slightly higher than those at less than 2 years of age (72.6%, 66.9%, and 65.3% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively). However, at 15 and 20 years posttransplant, survival rates were similar (>2 years=67.3% and 65.8%; <2 years=64.1% and 64.1%). A significant difference in survival was seen in CsA-based immunosuppression (71.2%, 68.1%, 65.4%, and 61%) versus tacrolimus-based immunosuppression (85.8%, 84.7%, 83.3%, and 82.9%) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively (P=0.0001). The maximum difference in survival was noted in the first 3 months between CsA and tacrolimus; thus, indicating there may have been other factors (nonimmunological factors) involved in terms of donor and recipient selection and technical issues. The mean annual death rate beyond 2 years posttransplant was 0.47%, with the mean annual death rate for patients who received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression being significantly lower than those who received CsA-based immunosuppression (0.14% vs. 0.8%; P=0.001). The most common etiologies of graft loss were hepatic artery thrombosis (33.4%), acute or chronic rejection (26.6%), and primary nonfunction (16.7%). Of note, retransplantation for graft loss because of acute or chronic rejection occurred only in those patients who received CsA-based immuno-suppression.

CONCLUSION

The overall 20-year actuarial survival for pediatric liver transplantation is 64%. Survival has increased by 20% in the last 12 years with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Although this improvement may be the result of several factors, retransplantation as a result of acute or chronic rejection has been completely eliminated in patients treated with tacrolimus.

Conversion from cyclosporin to tacrolimus in paediatric liver transplant recipients

Substitution of cyclosporin with tacrolimus should be considered for paediatric liver transplant recipients with cyclosporin-associated complications such as hypertension, gum hyperplasia, hirsutism, gynaecomastia and growth retardation, as well as recurrent or refractory acute rejection, chronic duct injury or chronic rejection. Continued experience with well tolerated drug administration and careful monitoring during drug substitution has limited drug toxicity associated with tacrolimus to a level comparable to or less than that associated with cyclosporin. Successful outcome with long term graft salvage has been reported in up to 80% of patients converted to tacrolimus because of acute rejection and 50% of patients converted because of chronic rejection. Nearly all children converted because of cyclosporin-related complications have a successful outcome. Additional benefits of conversion to tacrolimus include improvement in growth and resolution of hypertension, hirsutism and cushingoid facies. Complete corticosteroid withdrawal is possible in up to 78% of children post-conversion. Long term outcome in these patients may be optimised by conversion to tacrolimus at an early stage of acute or chronic transplant rejection in order to minimise the cumulative amount of immunosuppression. Avoidance of cyclosporin-related toxicity and minimisation of corticosteroid therapy may further improve patient compliance to drug therapy.

Conversion from cyclosporine to FK506 in adult liver transplant recipients: a combined North American and European experience

BACKGROUND

Although cyclosporine (CsA) made clinical liver transplantation possible, side effects and development of rejection have limited its use. In some patients, conversion to tacrolimus has been necessary to abrogate side effects and to preserve allograft function.

METHODS

The results of conversion from CsA to tacrolimus were studied retrospectively in 94 liver allograft recipients from a North American and a European transplant center (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, France).

RESULTS

Forty-seven of 94 patients (50%) were converted for steroid-resistant acute rejection. Conversion was successful in 91% of these patients, whereas 9% of patients developed chronic rejection. A further nine patients were converted for chronic allograft rejection with positive results in eight of nine grafts. Mean serum bilirubin in these nine patients was 8.7 mg/dl before conversion and 2.1 mg/dl 6 months after conversion (P=0.02). Nine patients were converted due to inability to wean steroid. Of these, six patients remains steroid free 1 year after conversion. Twenty-three patients (24%) were converted for nephrotoxicity with a reduction in serum creatinine from 167+/-36 mmol/L to 119+/-28 mmol/L 1 year after conversion (P=0.006). Eight of 11 patients converted for neurotoxicity improved after conversion. Conversion to tacrolimus had no effect on seizure frequency or memory loss.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that conversion to tacrolimus from CsA is an appropriate paradigm for graft rescue and treatment of a variety of side effects after liver transplant. However, some situations such as memory loss and hypertension may require other strategies.

Does tacrolimus offer virtual freedom from chronic rejection after primary liver transplantation? Risk and prognostic factors in 1,048 liver transplantations with a mean follow-up of 6 years

Tacrolimus has proven to be a potent immunosuppressive agent in liver transplantation (LT). Its introduction has led to significantly less frequent and severe acute rejection. Little is known about the rate of chronic rejection (CR) in primary LT using tacrolimus therapy. The aim of the present study is to examine the long-term incidence of CR, risk factors, prognostic factors, and outcome after CR. The present study evaluated the development of CR in 1,048 consecutive adult primary liver allograft recipients initiated and mostly maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. They were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 77.3 +/- 14.7 months (range, 50.7 to 100.1 months). To assess the impact of primary diagnosis on the rate and outcome of CR, the population was divided into 3 groups. Group I included patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)- or hepatitis B virus (HBV)-induced cirrhosis (n = 312); group II included patients diagnosed with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), or autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 217); and group III included patients with all other diagnoses (n = 519). Overall, 32 of 1,048 patients (3.1%) developed CR. This represented 13 (4.1%), 12 (5.5%), and 7 patients (1.3%) in groups I, II, and III, respectively. The relative risk for developing CR was 3.2 times greater for group I and 4.3 times greater for group II compared with group III. This difference was statistically significant (P =.004). The incidence of acute rejection and total number of acute rejection episodes were significantly greater in patients who developed CR compared with those who did not (P <.0001). Similarly, the mean donor age for CR was significantly older than for patients without CR (43.0 v 36.2 years; P =.02). Thirteen of the 32 patients (40.6%) who developed CR retained their original grafts for a mean period of 54 +/- 25 months after diagnosis. Seven patients (21.9%) underwent re-LT, and 12 patients (38.3%) died. Serum bilirubin levels and the presence of arteriopathy, arterial loss, and duct loss on liver biopsy at the time of diagnosis of CR were significantly greater among the 3 groups of patients. In addition, patient and graft survival for group I were significantly worse compared with groups II and III. We conclude that CR occurred rarely among patients maintained long term on tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. When steroid use is controlled, the incidence of acute rejection, mean donor age, HBV- and/or HCV-induced cirrhosis, or a diagnosis of PBC, PSC, or AIH were found to be predictors of CR. Greater values for serum bilirubin level, duct loss, arteriopathy, arteriolar loss, and presence of HCV or HBV were found to be poor prognostic factors for the 3 groups; greater total serum bilirubin value (P =.05) was the only factor found to be significant between patients who had graft loss versus those who recovered.

Beneficial effects of converting liver transplant recipients from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on blood pressure, serum lipids, and weight

Hypertension and hyperlipidemia are more prevalent after liver transplantation with cyclosporine as the primary immunosuppressive agent compared with tacrolimus. To determine whether blood pressure, serum lipid level, or weight improves when patients switch immunosuppression therapy, we retrospectively studied 26 liver transplant recipients with stable graft function who had been converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus therapy with a median follow-up of 8 months. One of the 26 patients developed pruritus necessitating withdrawal of tacrolimus. The results therefore concern the remaining 25 patients. With the exception of a small decrease in bilirubin level (P <.05), there was no difference in graft or renal function after conversion. Mean systolic blood pressure decreased from 158 +/- 25 to 148 +/- 22 mm Hg over a mean of 8 +/- 3 months after conversion to tacrolimus (P =.015), whereas mean serum cholesterol level decreased from 5.3 +/- 0.9 to 4.9 +/- 0.9 mmol/L (P =.01). Sixty-eight percent of the patients lost weight, from a mean of 79.4 +/- 22.6 to 76.1 +/- 20.1 kg, in the 11 months after switching to tacrolimus therapy (P =.024). Serum triglyceride and blood glucose levels did not change, and no patient developed diabetes mellitus after conversion. These results indicate that switching from cyclosporine to tacrolimus can reduce blood pressure, serum cholesterol level, and weight after liver transplantation.

Replicative senescence of biliary epithelial cells precedes bile duct loss in chronic liver allograft rejection: increased expression of p21(WAF1/Cip1) as a disease marker and the influence of immunosuppressive drugs

Early chronic liver allograft rejection (CR) is characterized by distinctive cytological changes in biliary epithelial cells (BECs) that resemble cellular senescence, in vitro, and precede bile duct loss. If patients suffering from early CR are treated aggressively, the clinical and histopathological manifestations of CR can be completely reversed and bile duct loss can be prevented. We first tested whether the senescence-related p21(WAF1/Cip1) protein is increased in BECs during early CR, and whether treatment reversed the expression. The percentage of p21+ BECs and the number of p21+ BECs per portal tract is significantly increased in early CR (26 +/- 17% and 3.6 +/- 3.1) compared to BECs in normal liver allograft biopsies or those with nonspecific changes (1 +/- 1% and 0.1 +/- 0.3; P: < 0.0001 and P: < 0.02), chronic hepatitis C (2 +/- 3% and 0.7 +/- 1; P: < 0.0001 and P: < 0.04) or obstructive cholangiopathy (7 +/- 7% and 0.7 +/- 0.6; P: < 0.006 and P: = 0.04). Successful treatment of early CR is associated with a decrease in the percentage of p21+ BECs and the number of p21+ BECs per portal tract. In vitro, nuclear p21(WAF1/Cip1) expression is increased in large and multinucleated BECs, and is induced by transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta. TGF-beta1 also increases expression of TGF-beta receptor II, causes phosphorylation of SMAD-2 and nuclear translocation of p21(WAF1/Cip1), which inhibits BEC growth. Because conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus is an effective treatment for early CR, we next tested whether these two immunosuppressive drugs directly influenced BEC growth in vitro. The results show that cyclosporine, but not tacrolimus, stimulates BEC TGF-beta1 production, which in turn, causes BEC mito-inhibition and up-regulation of nuclear p21(WAF1/Cip1). In conclusion, expression of the senescence-related p21(WAF1/Cip1) protein is increased in BECs during early CR and decreases with successful recovery. Replicative senescence accounts for the characteristic BEC cytological alterations used for the diagnosis of early CR and lack of a proliferative response to injury. The ability of cyclosporine to inhibit the growth of damaged BECs likely accounts for the relative duct sparing properties of tacrolimus.

New immunosuppressive drugs: an update

An increasing number of immunosuppressive drugs became available for clinical use over the past few decades. These include substances with recently recognized immunosuppressive properties, which needed careful evaluation in various trials before they could be approved for use in different diseases. The effectiveness of other agents was already established, but knowledge about their modes of action or the mechanisms that lead to side effects was acquired much later. This understanding also contributed to the development of new drugs that display synergistic effects or lack certain adverse effects. The greater choice afforded by such research endeavours allows us to select the best therapeutic strategy for an individual patient; however, this requires a comprehensive knowledge of the available options. The present review provides an update of current knowledge of the most important substances (including calcineurin and target of rapamycin inhibitors, regulators of gene expression, and inhibitors of purine and pyrimidine synthesis) and surveys some of the novel agents that are expected to play an important role in the future.

Liver transplantation. The pediatric challenge

Successful liver transplantation in a child is often a hard-won victory, requiring all the combined expertise of a dedicated pediatric transplant team. This article outlines the considerable challenges still facing pediatric liver transplant physicians and surgeons. In looking to the future, where should priorities lie to enhance the success already achieved? First, solutions to the donor shortage must be sought aggressively by increasing the use of from split-liver transplants, judicious application of living-donor programs, and increasing the donation rate, perhaps by innovative means. The major immunologic barriers, to successful xenotransplantation make it unlikely that this option will be tenable in the near future. Second, current immunosuppression is nonspecific, toxic, and unable to be individually adjusted to the patient's immune response. The goal of achieving donor-specific tolerance will require new consideration of induction protocols. Developing a clinically applicable method to measure the recipient's immunoreactivity is of paramount importance, for future studies of new immunosuppressive strategies and to address the immediate concern of long-term over-immunosuppression. The inclusion of pediatric patients in new protocols will require the ongoing insistence of pediatric transplant investigators. Third, the current immunosuppressive drugs have a long-term morbidity and mortality of their own. These long-term effects are particularly important in children who may well have decades of exposure to these therapies. There is now some understanding of their long-term renal toxicity and the risk of malignancy. New drugs may obviate renal toxicity, whereas the risk of malignancy is inherent in any nonspecific immunosuppressive regimen. Although progress is being made in preventing and recognizing PTLD, this entity remains an important ongoing concern. The global effect of long-term immunosuppression on the child's growth, development, and intellectual potential is unknown. Of particular concern is the potential for neurotoxicity from the calcineurin inhibitors. Fourth, recurrent disease and new diseases, perhaps potentiated by immunosuppressive drugs, must be considered. Already the recurrence of autoimmune disease and cryptogenic cirrhosis have been documented in pediatric patients. Now, a new lesion, a nonspecific hepatitis, sometimes with positive autoimmune markers, that may progress to cirrhosis has been recognized. It is not known whether this entity is an unusual form of rejection, an unrecognized viral infection, or a response to immunosuppressive drugs themselves. Finally, pediatric transplant recipients, like any other children, must be protected and nourished physically and mentally if they are to fulfill their potential. After liver transplantation the child's growth, intellectual functioning, and psychologic adaptation may all require special attention from parents, teachers, and physicians alike. There is limited understanding of how the enormous physical intervention of a liver transplantation affects a child's cognitive and psychologic function as the child progresses through life. The persons caring for these children have the difficult responsibility of providing services to evaluate these essential measures of children's health over the long term and to intervene if necessary. Part of the transplant physician's our duty to protect and advocate for children is to fight for equal access to health care. In most of the developing world, economic pressures make it impossible to consider liver transplantation a health care priority. In the United States and in other countries with the medical infrastructure to support liver transplantation, however, health care professionals must strive to be sure that the policies governing candidacy for transplantation and allocation of organs are applied justly and uniformly to all children whose lives are threatened by liver disease. In the current regulatory climate that increasingly takes medical decisions out of the hands of physicians, pediatricians must be even more prepared to protect the unique and often complicated needs of children both before and after transplantation. Only in this way can the challenges of the present and the future be met.

Comparative long-term evaluation of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

In this report, we compare the long-term outcome of pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) patients maintained with tacrolimus-based and with cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppressive therapy. We examine long-term patient and graft survival, the incidence of rejection, and immunosuppression-related complications.

METHOD

There were 233 consecutive primary LTx in children (ages <18 years) performed between October 1989 and December 1994 with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy (Group I). These were compared with 120 consecutive primary LTx performed with CsA-based immunosuppressive therapy between January 1988 and October 1989(Group II). Children in both groups were followed until July 1999. Mean follow-up was 91.41+/-17.7 months (range 55.6-117.8) for Group I, and 128+/-6.1 months (range 116.7-138.6) for Group II.

RESULTS

At 9 years of follow-up, actuarial patient and graft survival were significantly improved (patient survival 85.41% in Group I vs. 63.8% in Group II, P=0.0001; graft survival Group I 78.9% vs. 60.8% Group II, P=0.0003) and the rate of re -transplantation was significantly lower among patients in Group I (12% in Group I vs. 22.5% in Group II P=0.01). Children in Group I also experienced a significantly reduced incidence of acute rejection (0.97 per patient Group I vs. 1.5 per patient Group II P=0.002) and significantly less steroid resistant acute rejection episodes (3.1% in Group I vs. 8.6% in Group II P=0.0001). The mean steroid dose was significantly lower in Group I compared with Group II at all time points (P=0.0001) after LTx. Freedom from steroid was also significantly higher in Group I compared with Group II at all time points after LTx (ranging from 78% to 84% in Group I and 9% to 32% in Group II during a 1- to 7-year posttransplant period P=0.0001). The rate of hypertension was significantly lower in Group I than Group II (P=0.0001), and the severity of hypertension (need for more than one anti-hypertensive medication) was also significantly lower in Group I than Group II (P=0.0001). Although the rate of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) was not significantly different (13.7% Group I vs.8.3% Group II, P=0.13), the survival after PTLD was significantly better for Group I at 81.2% than for Group II at 50% after 5 years (P=0.034). Conclusion. The results suggest that tacrolimus-based therapy provides significant long-term benefit to pediatric LTx patients, evidenced by significantly improved patient and graft survival, reduced rate of rejection, and hypertension with lower steroid doses.

Current status of pediatric liver transplantation

Increased survival for young liver transplant recipients has greatly improved. Increasing success has led to broader indications, thereby increasing the number of potential recipients. Pediatric liver centers are developing new strategies to cope with the ever-increasing demands for suitable size appropriate grafts. UNOS is in the process of updating guidelines to regulate the sharing of organs which become available from new surgical techniques. In the future, alternative therapies, such as artificial liver assist devices and techniques of cellular transplantation and genetic modification of hepatocytes, may decrease the number of children who die while waiting for a suitable organ or even obviate the need for the liver transplantation.

Modern immunosuppression

The current treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) includes prophylaxis at the time of transplant, decreasing or stopping immunosuppresion and initiation of antiviral therapy in patients with polymerase chain reaction or clinical evidence of PTLD, and judicial reintroduction of immunosuppression in patients who have cleared their PTLD and have begun to have rejection. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, notable side effects, and toxicities of the immunosuppressive agents are described in this article. At the conclusion of each section the author's current practice with these agents and treatment strategies are described.

Long-term results after conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric liver transplantation for acute and chronic rejection

Tacrolimus is beneficial in liver transplantation for reversing steroid-resistant acute rejection, and for controlling the process of chronic rejection in allograft recipients receiving Cyclosporine- (CyA) based regimens. Very little is known about the long-term efficacy of tacrolimus in pediatric transplantation after conversion from CyA. Our study examines the long-term outcome after conversion to tacrolimus for acute or chronic rejection in pediatric liver transplant (LTx) recipients.

METHOD

Seventy-three children (age < 18 years) receiving their primary LTx under CyA between August 1989 and April 1996 were converted to tacrolimus for ongoing acute rejection (n=22, group I) or chronic rejection (n=51, group II). Mean age at the time of conversion was 10.2+/-5.5 years with a mean interval from LTx to conversion of 3.5+/-2.9 (range 0.5-10.1 years). There were 33 boys and 40 girls. All patients were followed until June 1999. Mean follow-up was 97.3+/-17.4 months (range 62.4-118.9 months).

RESULTS

Overall 5-year actual patient survival was 78.1% and 8-year actuarial survival was 74.6%. Patients converted to tacrolimus therapy to resolve acute rejection (group I) experience significantly better patient and graft survival at 5 and 8 years than those converted to resolve chronic rejection (group II). Eight-year patient survival and graft survival was 95.5 and 90.9% for group I compared to 74.6 and 53.5% for group II, respectively (long rank P=0.035 and 0.01, respectively). Nearly 75% of children were weaned off steroids after conversion. There was a marked improvement in hypertension, gum hyperplasia, hirsutism, and cushingoid appearance. One child in group I (4.5%) and four children in group II (7.8%) developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after conversion. There was an improvement in growth in children who were less than the age of 12 years at the time of conversion and who were weaned off steroids; more significantly girls responded more favorably than boys.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of transplantation is maintained long-term after conversion to tacrolimus for acute or chronic rejection. The response rate was significantly better in group I as compared with group 11. Marked improvement in growth, hypertension, and reversal of the brutalizing effects of CyA was noted after conversion to tacrolimus. The results suggest that early conversion of pediatric liver transplant patients is warranted for the treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and for improvements in quality of life.

Chronic liver allograft rejection in a population treated primarily with tacrolimus as baseline immunosuppression: long-term follow-up and evaluation of features for histopathological staging

BACKGROUND

Predisposing factors, long-term occurrence, and histopathological changes associated with recovery or progression to allograft failure from chronic rejection (CR) were studied in adult patients treated primarily with tacrolimus.

METHODS

CR cases were identified using stringent criteria applied to a retrospective review of computerized clinicopathological data and slides.

RESULTS

After 1973 days median follow-up, 35 (3.3%) of 1049 primary liver allograft recipients first developed CR between 16 and 2532 (median 242) days. The most significant risk factors for CR were the number (P<0.001) and histological severity (P<0.005) of acute rejection episodes and donor age >40 years (P<0.03). Other demographic and matching parameters were not associated with CR in this cohort. Ten patients died with, but not of, CR. Eight required retransplantation because of CR at a median of 268 days. Ten resolved either histologically or by normalization of liver injury tests over a median of 548 days. CR persisted for 340 to 2116 days in the remaining seven patients. More extensive bile duct loss (P<0.01), smallarterial loss (P<0.03), foam cell clusters (P<0.01) and higher total bilirubin (P<0.02) and aspartate aminotransferase (P<0.03) were associated with allograft failure from CR.

CONCLUSIONS

Early chronic liver allograft rejection is potentially reversible and a combination of histological, clinical, and laboratory data can be used to stage CR. Unique immunological and regenerative properties of liver allografts, which lead to a low incidence and reversibility of early CR, can provide insights into transplantation biology.

Treatment of tacrolimus-related adverse effects by conversion to cyclosporine in liver transplant recipients

When tacrolimus side effects persist despite dose reduction, conversion to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (CyA) is necessary. We characterized tacrolimus side effects that warranted discontinuation of the drug, and outcomes after conversion. Of 388 liver recipients who received tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression, 70 required conversion to CyA. We recorded indication for conversion, whether conversion was early or late after transplantation, tacrolimus dose and trough blood level at conversion, and incidence of rejection after conversion. Conversion was early in 29 patients (41.4%) and late in 41 (58.6%). Indications for early conversion were neurotoxicity (20), (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus (IDDM) (5), nephrotoxicity (3), gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (6), and cardiomyopathy (1), and for late conversion were neurotoxicity (15), IDDM (12), nephrotoxicity (3), GI toxicity (5), hepatotoxicity (6), post-transplant lmphoproliferate disease (PTLD) (2), cardiomyopathy (1), hemolytic anemia (1), and pruritus (1). All early-conversion patients showed improvement/resolution of symptoms. Among late-conversion patients, 37 (90.2%) had improvement/resolution; in 4 (9.8%), adverse effects persisted. The overall rejection rate was 30%. Sixty-two patients (88.6%) are alive with functioning grafts 686 +/- 362 days (range, 154-1433 days) after conversion. When tacrolimus side effects are unresponsive to dose reduction, conversion to CyA can be accomplished safely, with no increased risk of rejection and excellent long-term outcome.

Immunologic Aspects of Transplant Management: Pharmacotherapy and Rejection

The intensivist caring for the critically ill transplant patient must be knowledgeable in the management of immunosuppression or have expert help. Critical illness often has a major impact on the absorption and metabolism of immunosuppressive drugs, increasing or decreasing net immunosuppression. Too little immunosuppression brings the risk of graft loss, while too much increases the morbidity and mortality of serious infection. Optimum management often requires the skillful manipulation of dosage and/or routes of drug delivery. In many cases of life-threatening infection, immunosuppression must be discontinued altogether and restarted prior to significant graft injury. The cost of miscalculation is very high. Loss of a renal, pancreas, or small bowel transplant is tragic, while loss of a heart, lung, or liver is usually fatal. Unfortunately the management of immunosuppression is becoming more complex. As the field of transplantation matures, new immunosuppressants are being introduced. Also, more experience and growing numbers of clinical trials are making the required knowledge base ever larger. Each type of transplant has its own set of evolving immunosuppression strategies. This review presents the basic mechanisms of the most widely used drugs and the dangers of immunosuppression. The drugs are then discussed in the context of liver, small bowel, kidney, pancreas, heart, and lung transplantation. Finally, a brief section on the practical pharmacokinetics of the drugs is presented.

Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation

Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant agent that acts by a variety of different mechanisms which include inhibition of calcineurin. It is used as a therapeutic alternative to cyclosporin, and therefore represents a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is now well established for primary immunosuppression in liver and kidney transplantation, and experience with its use in other types of solid organ transplantation, including heart, lung, pancreas and intestinal, as well as its use for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), is rapidly accumulating. Large randomised nonblind multicentre studies conducted in the US and Europe in both liver and kidney transplantation showed similar patient and graft survival rates between treatment groups (although rates were numerically higher with tacrolimus- versus cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in adults with liver transplants), and a consistent statistically significant advantage for tacrolimus with respect to acute rejection rate. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial, and a trend towards a lower rate of chronic rejection was noted with tacrolimus in a large multicentre renal transplantation study. In general, a similar trend in overall efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of additional clinical trials comparing tacrolimus- with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in various types of transplantation. One notable exception is in BMT, where a large randomised trial showed significantly better 2-year patient survival with cyclosporin over tacrolimus, which was primarily attributed to patients with advanced haematological malignancies at the time of (matched sibling donor) BMT. These survival results in BMT require further elucidation. Tacrolimus has also demonstrated efficacy in various types of transplantation as rescue therapy in patients who experience persistent acute rejection (or significant adverse effect's) with cyclosporin-based therapy, whereas cyclosporin has not demonstrated a similar capacity to reverse refractory acute rejection. A corticosteroid-sparing effect has been demonstrated in several studies with tacrolimus, which may be a particularly useful consideration in children receiving transplants. The differences in the tolerability profiles of tacrolimus and cyclosporin may well be an influential factor in selecting the optimal treatment for patients undergoing organ transplantation. Although both drugs have a similar degree of nephrotoxicity, cyclosporin has a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia, while tacrolimus has a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, some types of neurotoxicity (e.g. tremor, paraesthesia), diarrhoea and alopecia.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus is an important therapeutic option for the optimal individualisation of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.

Living related liver transplantation: histopathologic analysis of graft dysfunction in 304 patients

Between June 1990 and August 1997, 304 mainly pediatric patients underwent a total of 311 orthotopic living related liver transplantations (LRLTs) under tacrolimus immunosuppression at Kyoto University Hospital. Congenital biliary atresia was the most common underlying disease. The donor was a parent, and the left lateral segments were used as grafts in most cases. The average number of loci of HLA-A, -B, and -DR mismatches between the donor and the recipient were 2.1. Forty-three transplants were ABO-incompatible. Liver histology at the time of abnormal liver function after transplantation was analyzed. Preservation injury was rare and mild. Acute cellular rejection (ACR) occurred in 36% of transplants during the first 6 months. Average rejection activity index (the Banff schema) was 4.2 and severe rejection was rarely seen. The number of mismatching HLA loci and immunosuppression regimens affected the incidence of ACR. Chronic rejection (CR) occurred in 2% of transplants. Concerning humoral rejection, no hyperacute rejection was seen. However, hepatic artery thrombosis (delayed hyperacute rejection) was seen in an ABO-incompatible transplant. Acute hepatitis, including those related to cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus, occurred in 17% of transplants. Chronic hepatitis, including hepatitis B and C, developed in 3%. Acute or chronic cholangitis occurred in 16%, and a significantly higher incidence of cholangitis was found in ABO-incompatible transplants. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease developed in 2%. In LRLT, milder preservation injury and less frequent ACR and CR were suggested, probably because of the short cold-ischemia time and the advantages of HLA histocompatibility, respectively.

Immunosuppressant-induced nephropathy: pathophysiology, incidence and management

Immunosuppressant-induced nephrotoxicity, in particular chronic progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis/arteriopathy induced by the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin and tacrolimus, has become the 'Achilles heel' of immunosuppressive agents. The use of calcineurin inhibitors as primary immunosuppressants in hepatic and cardiac transplantation has led to end-stage renal disease and dialysis. Calcineurin inhibitor-induced acute renal failure may occur as early as a few weeks or months after initiation of cyclosporin therapy. The clinical manifestations of acute renal dysfunction are caused by vasoconstriction of renal arterioles, and include reduction in glomerular filtration rate, hypertension, hyperkalaemia, tubular acidosis, increased reabsorption of sodium and oliguria. The acute adverse effects of calcineurin inhibitors on renal haemodynamics are thought to be directly related to the cyclosporin or tacrolimus dosage and blood concentration. However, new clinical data indicate that calcineurin inhibitor-induced chronic nephropathy can occur independently of acute renal dysfunction, cyclosporin dosage or blood concentration. Several strategies have been evaluated to attenuate cyclosporin-induced nephropathy, but their efficacy remains unknown. Cytokine release syndrome associated with the use of muronomab-CD3 (OKT-3) can also contribute to the pathogenesis of transient acute tubular necrosis and renal dysfunction following renal transplantation. Continued research and clinical experience should provide information regarding the aetiology of cyclosporin-induced chronic progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis/arteriopathy and its potential treatment.

Analysis of the reversibility of chronic liver allograft rejection implications for a staging schema

In contrast to all other vascularized organ allografts, chronic rejection (CR) of the liver is potentially reversible. We therefore studied demographic, perioperative, biochemical, and histologic features associated with reversibility or progression to graft failure. Using very stringent clinical and histological criteria, we identified a subgroup of 23 of 916 patients receiving primary liver allografts with CR from the Liver Transplantation Database. Of these, 13 experienced graft failure as a result of CR, and 10 patients recovered to normal histology or liver injury test results. Male-to-female sex mismatch (p = 0.07), younger recipient age (p = 0.09), younger donor age (p = 0.06), white-to-white race match (p = 0.09), primary diagnosis of biliary atresia (p = 0.02), and cold ischemia time of more than 12 hours (p = 0.02) were associated with graft failure. Patients who eventually recovered from CR were more likely to have acute rejection within the first 2 weeks (70% vs 23%; p = 0.04), had a higher number of acute rejection episodes (p = 0.08), and were more likely to have been treated with OKT3 (90% vs 46%, p = 0.07). Although overlap existed in the histopathologic findings between the patients whose grafts failed and those who recovered, those patients who developed bile duct loss in more than 50% of the portal tracts (p < 0.01), severe (bridging) perivenular fibrosis (p = 0.05), and the presence of foam cell clusters (p = 0.06) were more likely to require retransplantation. In contrast to other solid organ allografts, CR of the liver is not an irreversible process. These findings can be used to understand the evolution of CR and to design a biologically correct and clinically relevant staging system.

Differences in Type 1 and Type 2 intracytoplasmic cytokines, detected by flow cytometry, according to immunosuppression (cyclosporine A vs. tacrolimus) in stable renal allograft recipients

Recent multicenter, randomized clinical trials have shown that in renal transplant patients tacrolimus (FK506) was more efficient than cyclosporine A (CsA) at preventing acute rejection. In order to try and evaluate whether this difference was related to a different in vivo T-cell suppression we assessed, in a prospective study, the frequencies of interleukin (IL)-2-, IL-4-, IL-5-, IL-6-, IL-10-, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)- and double-positive IL-2/IFN-gamma-producing whole T cells, CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell subsets by means of cytokine flow cytometry. This was performed after in vitro stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and ionomycin, in the presence of monensin, in 14 healthy volunteers (controls) and in 14 renal transplant patients. The immunosuppression of the latter was based either on CsA (n = 7) or on FK506 (n = 7). Cytokine-expressing T-cell frequencies were assessed immediately pretransplantation (DO), and subsequently 3 months (M3) and 6 months (M6) afterwards in fasting patients prior to the morning intake of the immunosuppressive drug. We found that at DO the frequencies of IL-2-(22 +/- 2% vs. 22.2 +/- 2%), IFN-gamma-(26 +/- 3% vs. 29 + 3.4%) and IL-4-(0.8 +/- 0.2% vs. 1.4 +/- 0.2%)-expressing T lymphocytes were not significantly different between the controls and the patients, respectively. Conversely, the frequency of IL-2/IFN-gamma double positive cells was higher in the latter (9.3 +/- 1.6%) than in the controls (5.6 +/- 0.8); p = 0.06. Finally, on D0 the frequencies of IL-5-, IL-6-, and IL-10-producing T lymphocytes were lower than 1%, in both groups, as well as after grafting, i.e. on M3 and M6. As compared to baseline (DO): (a) chronic immunosuppression significantly decreased the frequencies of IL-2-, IL-4- and IL-2/IFN-gamma-expressing T cells, whereas those of IFN-gamma, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10 were not significantly affected; (b) the frequencies of cytokine-expressing T cells were not statistically different between M3 and M6; (c) the decrease in the frequencies of IL-2- and IL-2/IFN-gamma-expressing T cells affected CD4 + and CD8 + cells equally; (d) there was a marginal decrease in the frequency of IFN-gamma-expressing cells only in the CD4 + subset but not in the CD8 population; and (e) for CsA, but not for FK506, the frequency of the IL-2-expressing T cells was negatively correlated with the whole blood trough levels. When we compared the frequencies of cytokine-expressing cells in FK506- and CsA-treated patients, we found that the frequency of IL-2-expressing T cells was significantly lower with FK506 (10.9+/-1.61%) than with CsA (16.3 +/- 1.8%; p = 0.03), whereas the frequencies of the other cytokine-expressing cells were not statistically different between the two groups. In conclusion, our study clearly demonstrated that studied ex vivo, FK506 and CsA decrease the frequencies of cells expressing IL-2, IL-4 and IL-2/IFN-gamma in vivo but do not affect those expressing IFN-gamma. Meanwhile, the frequency of IL-2-producing T cells was more affected with FK506 than with CsA and was negatively correlated with the CsA trough level. Finally, our results regarding IL-2 might explain to some extent the higher efficiency of FK506 in vivo than CsA.