Donor-specific hyporeactivity after liver transplantation: prominent decreases in donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor frequencies independent of changes in helper T lymphocyte precursor frequencies or suppressor cell activity

Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Donor-Reactive T Cells Reveals Role of Apoptosis in Donor-Specific Hyporesponsiveness of Kidney Transplant Recipients

After kidney transplantation (KT), donor-specific hyporesponsiveness (DSH) of recipient T cells develops over time. Recently, apoptosis was identified as a possible underlying mechanism. In this study, both transcriptomic profiles and complete V(D)J variable regions of TR transcripts from individual alloreactive T cells of kidney transplant recipients were determined with single-cell RNA sequencing. Alloreactive T cells were identified by CD137 expression after stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from KT recipients (N = 7) prior to and 3-5 years after transplantation with cells of their donor or a third party control. The alloreactive T cells were sorted, sequenced and the transcriptome and T cell receptor profiles were analyzed using unsupervised clustering. Alloreactive T cells retain a highly polyclonal T Cell Receptor Alpha/Beta repertoire over time. Post transplantation, donor-reactive CD4+ T cells had a specific downregulation of genes involved in T cell cytokine-mediated pathways and apoptosis. The CD8+ donor-reactive T cell profile did not change significantly over time. Single-cell expression profiling shows that activated and pro-apoptotic donor-reactive CD4+ T cell clones are preferentially lost after transplantation in stable kidney transplant recipients.

Alloantibody Generation and Effector Function Following Sensitization to Human Leukocyte Antigen

Allorecognition is the activation of the adaptive immune system to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) resulting in the generation of alloantibodies. Due to a high polymorphism, foreign HLA is recognized by the immune system following transplant, transfusion, or pregnancy resulting in the formation of the germinal center and the generation of long-lived alloantibody-producing memory B cells. Alloantibodies recognize antigenic epitopes displayed by the HLA molecule on the transplanted allograft and contribute to graft damage through multiple mechanisms, including (1) activation of the complement cascade resulting in the formation of the MAC complex and inflammatory anaphylatoxins, (2) transduction of intracellular signals leading to cytoskeletal rearrangement, growth, and proliferation of graft vasculature, and (3) immune cell infiltration into the allograft via FcγR interactions with the FC portion of the antibody. This review focuses on the generation of HLA alloantibody, routes of sensitization, alloantibody specificity, and mechanisms of antibody-mediated graft damage.

Adoptive transfusion of tolerogenic dendritic cells prolongs the survival of liver allograft: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the effects of tolerogenic dendritic cells (Tol-DCs) induced by different methods on liver transplantation and their possible mechanisms of action.

METHODS

PubMed and EMbase were searched for relevant articles through 31 December 2013. The effects of Tol-DCs on liver allograft survival were semiquantitatively evaluated, and the possible mechanisms by which Tol-DCs prolong graft survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Seven articles were included, and classified according to methods of induction, sources, and methods of infusing Tol-DCs. Tol-DCs induced from immature DCs (imDCs), with cytokines, and by gene modification induced liver transplant tolerance for 33.1 ± 32.5 days (2.7-fold vs. control), 26.17 ± 16.20 days (1.8-fold vs. control), and 11.7 ± 1.6 days (2.3-fold vs. control), respectively. DCs derived from recipient bone marrow, donor bone marrow, and donor spleen induced liver transplant tolerance for 51.0 ± 0.0 days (5.9-fold vs. control), 21.4 ± 26.8 days (2.4-fold vs. control), and 15.0 ± 0.0 days (2.3-fold vs. control), respectively. The primary mechanisms by which Tol-DCs induce liver transplant tolerance were the induction of T-cell hyporeactivity and Th2 differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Tol-DCs induced by three different methods could extend liver allograft survival, with imDCs showing optimal results. The optimal infusion method was intravenous injection of 1-2 × 10(6) Tol-DC, similar to findings in renal transplantation. Tol-DCs prolonged liver transplant tolerance more than renal transplant tolerance.

Serial assessment of immune status by circulating CD8 effector T cell frequencies for posttransplant infectious complications

To clarify the role of CD8⁺ effector T cells for infectious complications, 92 recipients were classified according to the hierarchical clustering of preoperative CD8⁺CD45 isoforms: Group I was naive, Group II was effector memory, and Group III was effector (E) T cell-dominant. The posttransplant infection rates progressively increased from 29% in Group I to 64.3% in Group III recipients. The posttransplant immune status was compared with the pretransplant status, based on the measure (% difference) and its graphical form (scatter plot). In Groups I and II, both approaches showed a strong upward deviation from pretransplant status upon posttransplant infection, indicating an enhanced clearance of pathogens. In Group III, in contrast, both approaches showed a clear downward deviation from preoperative status, indicating deficient cytotoxicity. The % E difference and scatter plot can be used as a useful indicator of a posttransplant infectious complication.

DEMONSTRATION THAT DONOR-SPECIFIC NONRESPONSIVENESS IN HUMAN LIVER ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS IS BOTH RARE AND TRANSIENT

BACKGROUND

The side effects of lifetime immunosuppression are a major cause of morbidity and mortality; however, in the absence of prospective monitoring, immunosuppression withdrawal may lead to graft loss from rejection. To detect and monitor suitable recipients for immunosuppression withdrawal, the authors used an in vitro assay of T-cell function to study 71 long-term liver allograft recipients.

METHODS

Interleukin-2 secretion by blood mononuclear cells was measured in response to recall antigens, alloantigen (donor and third-party), and phytohemagglutinin.

RESULTS

Forty-four recipients were studied at a single time point at least 1 month after transplantation. The majority reacted to all antigens (n=33), whereas four showed globally reduced or absent responses (n=4) and six had markedly reduced or absent responses to donor alloantigen in the presence of preserved responses to third-party alloantigen and recall antigens. Four of these donor-nonresponsive recipients were retested 6 to 12 months later, by which time all had redeveloped responses to donor alloantigen. Serial measurements for up to 2 years in a prospective cohort of 27 liver allograft recipients showed only two patients to be consistently donor-nonresponsive posttransplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients rapidly reacquire vigorous immune responses after liver transplantation, and only a minority are hyporesponsive to donor alloantigen. Donor-specific nonresponsiveness is transient in most patients, and serial monitoring is required to define sustained periods of donor-specific nonresponsiveness. Whether such patients are suitable for immunosuppressive withdrawal is unclear.

Immunologic monitoring

The development of reliable in vitro assays that could allow the quantitation and characterization of anti-donor alloimmune responses has always been a goal in clinical transplantation, both to predict presensitization to the transplanted tissue and to be able to identify rejection without resorting to more invasive tests. With recent development in our understanding of transplantation biology and therapeutics, there is a real expectation that these tests may be used to identify tolerance as much as to predict rejection. The traditional limiting dilution assays still have a contribution to make and are being complemented by an array of tools, such as ELISpot, flow cytometry-based techniques, and microarray analysis. The assays that have been informative, to date, are discussed in this review. This information will lead, at least, to a better understanding of how and when the rejection process occurs. More interestingly, the objective is to apply this information to evaluate tolerance-inducing strategies or to identify patients that have become tolerant to their graft and can be weaned of immunosuppression. Of course sensitive, accurate and specific immunologic monitoring has applications well beyond the field of transplantation.

Detection of alloreactive T cells by flow cytometry: a new test compared with limiting dilution assay

BACKGROUND

Frequencies of alloreactive T cells determined by limiting dilution assays (LDA) may not adequately reflect the donor-reactive immune status in transplant recipients. To reevaluate LDA frequencies, we developed a flow cytometry test for direct determination of alloreactive T-cell frequencies and compared these frequencies with classical LDA estimates of frequencies.

METHODS

For determination of frequencies by flow cytometry, peripheral blood lymphocytes (or lymphocytes taken from primary mixed lymphocyte culture) were stimulated with either Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines or T cell-depleted spleen cells and stained for intracellular interferon (IFN)-gamma production and CD69. In lung transplant recipients, frequencies of IFN+ alloreactive T cells were compared with LDA frequencies, that is, cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursors and helper T lymphocyte precursors.

RESULTS

With flow cytometry, alloreactive T cells were detected after overnight allostimulation as IFN-gamma CD69bright cells (range, 0.1-0.58% and 0.1-0.66% of total CD4 and CD8 cells, respectively). Frequencies increased 25-fold or more when lymphocytes were prestimulated in primary mixed lymphocyte culture before testing. After lung transplantation, mean donor-specific IFN+ CD8 T-cell frequencies did not decrease as mean donor-specific LDA cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor frequencies, whereas no difference was seen in pretransplantation samples or third-party-specific frequencies at both time points. Mean frequencies of IFN+ CD4 did not differ from helper T lymphocyte precursors at both time points, but frequencies did not correlate.

CONCLUSIONS

The flow cytometry test allows a direct measurement of alloreactive T-cell frequencies and demonstrates a discrepancy between donor-specific IFN+ CD8 T-cell frequencies and LDA CLTp after transplantation. This may be a result of the existence of "functional diverse" alloreactive T cells or of activation-induced cell death of donor-reactive T cells during long (LDA) culturing, which is avoided in the flow cytometry test.

Down-regulated donor-specific T-cell reactivity during successful tapering of immunosuppression after kidney transplantation

Stable cadaveric renal transplant patients were routinely converted from cyclosporin A (CsA) to either azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1 year after transplantation to reduce the side effects of long-term immunosuppressive therapy. Thereafter, the AZA and MMF dose was gradually tapered to 50% at 2 years after transplantation. We questioned whether a reduction of immunosuppressive treatment results in a rise of donor-specific T-cell reactivity. Before transplantation (no immunosuppression), 1 year (high dose immunosuppression) and 2 years (low dose immunosuppression) after transplantation, the T-cell reactivity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) against donor and third-party spleen cells was tested in mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC) and against tetanus toxoid (TET) to test the general immune response. We also measured the frequency of donor and third-party reactive helper (HTLpf) and cytotoxic (CTLpf) T-lymphocyte precursors in a limiting dilution assay. Donor-specific responses, calculated by relative responses (RR = donor/third-party reactivity), were determined. Comparing responses after transplantation during high dose immunosuppression with responses before transplantation (no immmunosuppression), the donor-specific MLC-RR (P = 0.04), HTLp-RR (P = 0.04) and CTLp-RR (P = 0.09) decreased, while the TET-reactivity did not change. Comparing the responses during low dose with high dose immunosuppression, no donor- specific differences were found in the MLC-RR, HTLp-RR and CTLp-RR, although TET-reactivity increased considerably (P = 0.0005). We observed a reduction in donor-specific T-cell reactivity in stable patients after renal transplantation during in vivo high dose immunosuppression. Tapering of the immunosuppressive load had no rebound effect on the donor-specific reactivity, while it allowed recovery of the response to nominal antigens.

Cellular methods used to evaluate the immune response in transplantation

Cellular assays have been developed to test for various effector, cytotoxic, and regulatory functions of T cells and have been used throughout the history of clinical transplantation to assess the immune profile of solid organ and marrow recipients. One goal of these cellular studies has been to determine if posttransplant changes in the donor antigen-specific cellular response could predict good and poor graft outcome, thereby allowing for individualization of immunosuppression. This review outlines the use of established and newly developed cellular assays to assess the dynamic processes of the posttransplant immune response and to provide insights into the mechanisms involved and potential points for intervention.

Kidney transplantation after liver transplantation from the same donor: four cases of successful steroid withdrawal

BACKGROUND

Administration of corticosteroids to kidney recipients has hampered the complete clinical success of kidney transplantation. Because most organ transplantation in Japan is living-related, we had the experience of performing kidney transplantation (KT) after liver transplantation (LT) from the same donor in four patients and successfully withdrew corticosteroid administration.

METHODS

Three pediatric and one adult patient received kidney allografts from 3 to 10 months after LT from the same donor. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of a corticosteroid and tacrolimus. The steroid was withdrawn after KT in all four patients. After complete withdrawal of the steroid, DNA was extracted from two recipients and examined by polymerase chain reaction to detect microchimerism. A mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity assay (CML) were performed to test for donor-specific hyporesponsiveness.

RESULTS

Steroid withdrawal was successfully accomplished after KT in every patient. No steroid-withdrawal-associated complications were observed. In the three pediatric patients, remarkable catch-up growth was observed after steroid withdrawal. In the two patients tested, donor DNA was not detected by polymerase chain reaction, suggesting the absence of microchimerism. MLR and CML showed that recipient lymphocytes reacted against donor lymphocytes at the same level as against the third-party lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

Steroid withdrawal was successfully achieved in four kidney recipients who had received a liver allograft from the same donor. The MLR and CML findings indicated the absence of donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in vitro. Although the precise mechanism is not yet clear, KT after LT from the same donor should be considered as a method that allows steroids to be withdrawn from the immunosuppressive regimen of KT.

Loss of direct and maintenance of indirect alloresponses in renal allograft recipients: implications for the pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the principal cause of late renal allograft failure. This complex process is multifactorial in origin, and there is good evidence for immune-mediated effects. The immune contribution to this process is directed by CD4(+) T cells, which can be activated by either direct or indirect pathways of allorecognition. For the first time, these pathways have been simultaneously compared in a cohort of 22 longstanding renal allograft recipients (13 with good function and nine with CAN). CD4(+) T cells from all patients reveal donor-specific hyporesponsiveness by the direct pathway according to proliferation or the secretion of the cytokines IL-2, IL-5, and IFN-gamma. Donor-specific cytotoxic T cell responses were also attenuated. In contrast, the frequencies of indirectly alloreactive cells were maintained, patients with CAN having significantly higher frequencies of CD4(+) T cells indirectly activated by allogeneic peptides when compared with controls with good allograft function. An extensive search for alloantibodies has revealed significant titers in only a minority of patients, both with and without CAN. In summary, this study demonstrates widespread donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in directly activated CD4(+) T cells derived from longstanding recipients of renal allografts, whether they have CAN or not. However, patients with CAN have significantly higher frequencies of CD4(+) T cells activated by donor Ags in an indirect manner, a phenomenon resembling split tolerance. These findings provide an insight into the pathogenesis of CAN and also have implications for the development of a clinical tolerance assay.

Human liver allograft acceptance and the "tolerance assay": in vitro anti-donor T cell assays show hyporeactivity to donor cells, but unlike DTH, fail to detect linked suppression

Human allograft acceptance is associated with immune regulation, characterized by donor-antigen-linked suppression of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH). We wished to determine if "classical" in vitro assays of alloreactivity could also detect linked suppression and thus be useful in the clinical diagnosis of active immune regulation. We analyzed peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a group of eight liver transplant recipients, one of whom had stopped all immunosuppression 4.5 years ago yet continues to have good graft function (graft acceptor). The regulator phenotype was defined as the ability to suppress a DTH response to a recall antigen in the presence of donor antigen. Using the trans vivo DTH test, we identified four regulators, and four nonregulators. When we tested two of the regulators for in vitro mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses to B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCL), we found both patients to be specifically hyporesponsive to donor compared with third-party B-LCL stimulators. However, in contrast to the linked suppression of DTH seen when a given B-LCL expressed donor-type HLA-B antigens, there was no evidence of linked suppression in vitro, either in CTL, proliferative, or interferon-gamma cytokine release assays. The primary CTL hyporesponsiveness to donor B-LCL could not be reversed by neutralizing antibodies to transforming growth factor beta or interleukin-10, which could restore a strong DTH response to donor B-LCL. We conclude that DTH analysis can readily detect donor antigen-linked suppression in liver transplant recipients. CTL and MLC tests failed to do so. These findings may be relevant to the development of a tolerance assay suitable for use in clinical trials.

The role of the allograft in the induction of donor-specific T cell hyporesponsiveness

BACKGROUND

With adequate immunosuppression the majority of renal allografts are accepted, despite the exceptional vigour of the T cell alloimmune response. Previous work from this laboratory has demonstrated that this is accompanied by significant reductions in the precursor frequencies of anti-donor T cells. We have also shown that parenchymal cells are tolerogenic in vitro. We propose that the reduction in T cell frequencies may be due to the interaction between circulating T cells and potentially tolerogenic graft parenchymal cells. Primed/memory T cells (CD45RO+) are the only subset capable of reaching the allograft and therefore we would predict that T cell hyporesponsiveness would develop predominantly in the CD45RO+ subset due to their trafficking properties.

METHODS

Frequencies of IL-2 secreting CD45RA+ and CD45RO+ CD4+ T cells in response to donor and third party stimulator cells were estimated in a series of renal transplant recipients, both before and after transplantation.

RESULTS

There were highly significant reductions in the frequencies of donor-specific CD4+CD45RO+ T cells, when adjusted to control for the generalised effects of immunosuppression. There were no significant alterations in the frequencies of donor-specific CD4+CD45RA+ T cells.

CONCLUSIONS

In renal transplant recipients, donor-specific CD4+ T cell hyporesponsiveness occurs predominantly in CD4+ CD45RO+ T cells which is the subset capable of trafficking through the graft.

Weaning of immunosuppression in living donor liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Some reported studies have indicated the possibility of immunosuppression withdrawal in cadaveric liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility and feasibility of weaning living donor liver transplant recipients from immunosuppression.

METHODS

From June of 1990 to October of 1999, 63 patients were considered to be weaned from immunosuppression. They consisted of 26 electively weaned patients and 37 either forcibly or incidentally weaned patients (nonelective weaning) due to various causes but mainly due to infection. Regarding elective weaning, we gradually reduced the frequency of tacrolimus administration for patients who survived more than 2 years after transplantation, maintained a good graft function, and had no rejection episodes in the preceding 12 months. The frequency of administration was reduced from the conventional b.i.d. until the start of weaning to q.d., 4 times a week, 3 times a week, twice a week, once a week, twice a month, once a month, and finally, the patients were completely weaned off with each weaning period lasting from 3 to 6 months. The reduction method of nonelective weaning depended on the clinical course of each individual case. When the patients were clinically diagnosed to develop rejection during weaning, then such patients were treated by a reintroduction of tacrolimus or an additional steroid bolus when indicated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (38.1%) achieved a complete withdrawal of tacrolimus with a median drug-free period of 23.5 months (range, 3-69 months). Twenty-three patients (36.5%) are still being weaned at various stages. Sixteen patients (25.4%) encountered rejection while weaning at median period of 9.5 months (range, 1-63 months) from the start of weaning. All 16 were easily treated with the reintroduction of tacrolimus or additional steroid bolus therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to achieve a complete withdrawal of immunosuppression in some selected patients. Although the mechanism of graft acceptance in these patients has yet to be elucidated, we believe that a majority of long-term patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation may, thus, be potential candidates to be successfully weaned from immunosuppression.

Rapid decreases in donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte precursor frequencies and graft outcome after liver and lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

A decrease in donor-specific T cell precursor frequencies as seen late, one or more years, after transplantation is assumed to reflect transplantation tolerance, a condition important for long term acceptance of the allograft. However, such late decreases also occur in recipients that developed chronic transplant dysfunction questioning its relevance in transplantation tolerance. We investigated whether early, i.e., the first 6 months, decreases in donor-specific T cell precursor frequencies reflect transplantation tolerance and predict graft outcome after liver and lung transplantation.

METHODS

Donor and third party specific cytotoxic (CTLp) and helper T lymphocyte precursor (HTLp) frequencies were analyzed in pretransplant and 1 (or 2) and 6-month blood samples taken from liver and lung recipients and were correlated with graft outcome.

RESULTS

In liver allograft recipients with good graft function (n=7), mean donor-specific CTLp frequencies decreased as early as 1 month after transplantation and remained low thereafter. In contrast, mean CTLp frequencies did not decrease in liver allograft recipients with chronic transplant dysfunction (n=6). In lung allograft recipients, donor-specific CTLp frequencies remained relatively high and frequencies were not different between recipients without (n=6) or with (n=6) chronic transplant dysfunction. Donor-specific HTLp frequencies did not change significantly after liver or lung transplantation and did not differ between recipients without or with chronic transplant dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

An early decrease in donor-specific CTLp correlates with good graft outcome after liver transplantation. Such rapid decreases in alloreactivity do not occur after lung transplantation illustrating the unique capacity of liver allografts to induce transplantation tolerance.

Analysis of alloreactivity and intragraft cytokine profiles in living donor liver transplant recipients with graft acceptance

Although some previous studies have indicated the possibility of immunosuppression withdrawal in clinical liver transplantation, the mechanism of graft acceptance is not clear. The aim of this study is to elucidate the alloreactivity against the donor and intragraft cytokine profiles in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with graft acceptance. In October 1999, we had 23 patients who survived without immunosuppression after LDLT with a median drug-free period of 25 months (range: 3-69 months). They consisted of six patients who were electively weaned by an elective weaning protocol and 17 either forcibly or accidentally weaned patients due to various causes but mainly due to infection. We evaluated the alloreactivity against the donor in these patients by a mixed lymphocyte reaction and intragraft cytokine profiles by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The development of donor-specific hyporeactivity was observed in the patients with graft acceptance. The cytokine pattern in the supernatant of the culture medium revealed a down regulation of T helper (Th) 1 cytokine INF gamma against the donor while no significant difference was seen in Th2 cytokine IL-10. Regarding the intragraft cytokine profiles, we could find no amplification of Thl cytokines (IL-2, INF y) and IL-4 while some of the patients revealed a gene expression of IL-10 with no significant difference from that of the normal, untransplanted liver specimen. In addition, no difference was observed in any other cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-8, IL-15, TNFalpha) compared with those of the normal controls. We propose that the down regulation of Th1 cytokine is one possible mechanism of graft acceptance in LDLT recipients.

Decreased donor-specific cytotoxic T cell precursor frequencies one year after clinical lung transplantation do not reflect transplantation tolerance: a comparison of lung transplant recipients with or without bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

BACKGROUND

Decreased in vitro T cell alloreactivity, demonstrated by decreased frequencies of peripheral blood donor-specific T cell precursors, may reflect a tolerant state after transplantation and lower the risk for development of chronic graft dysfunction. It is unknown whether a decrease in donor-specific T cell frequencies also occurs after clinical lung transplantation and if such a decrease lowers the risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a hallmark of chronic graft dysfunction. Therefore, we compared changes in posttransplant donor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTLp) and helper T lymphocyte precursor (HTLp) frequencies in lung allograft recipients with good graft function and in recipients with BOS.

METHODS

Donor and third party specific CTLp and HTLp frequencies were determined by limiting dilution assay in pre- and posttransplant (1 year) peripheral blood samples of lung allograft recipients with good graft function (n = 13) and BOS (n = 10).

RESULTS

In recipients with good graft function, mean donor-specific CTLp frequencies decreased after transplantation (183 vs. 16 precursors before and after transplantation, respectively). Additionally, HTLp frequencies decreased but this was not specific for donor alloantigens because third party-specific HTLp frequencies decreased also. Surprisingly, recipients with BOS also showed a decrease in mean donor-specific CTLp frequencies after transplantation (332 vs. 49 precursors before and after transplantation, respectively). Again, HTLp frequencies decreased nonspecifically.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that donor-specific CTLp frequencies decrease after lung transplantation, but that this does not result in transplantation tolerance protecting the lung against the development of chronic graft dysfunction.

Analysis of post-transplant immune status in recipients of liver/bone marrow allografts

The aims of this study were to assess the effect of donor bone marrow infusion on the reactivity of recipient peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) to mitogen and to donor and third-party cells after primary liver allotransplantation and to identify any correlation between altered immunoreactivity and HLA mismatches, occurrence of rejection, and immunosuppression. The immunoreactivity of recipient PBL toward frozen donor splenocytes was evaluated in mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) (n = 29) and cell-mediated lympholysis (CML) (n = 27) assays in time intervals ranging from 0.7 to 27 months after transplant. Overall, the mean anti-donor MLC stimulation index (SI) fell from 25.6 +/- 5.2 preoperatively to 4.8 +/- 1.7 after transplantation (p < 0.002), with 14 out of 29 (48.3%) patients developing donor-specific MLC hyporeactivity. HLA class II mismatches were significantly associated with recipient post-transplant immune profile (p < 0.05): MLC donor specific hyporesponsiveness was observed in 70%, versus 37% of patients who shared a class II antigen, versus those that did not. Of the control group, 61.1% developed donor-specific nonreactivity versus 27.2% in the donor bone marrow cells (DBMC) group (p = 0.02). Donor-specific CML hyporeactivity was observed after transplantation, independent of DBMC infusion, with mean percentage values of pre- and post-transplant donor-specific lysis of 22.4% +/- 4.1% versus 3.1% +/- 1.6%, p = 0.0004, respectively. Our results suggest that DBMC infusion favors development of nonspecific MLC hyporesponsiveness to donor and third-party alloantigen, with maintenance of reactivity to mitogen and no additional effect on T-cell cytotoxicity.