Concomitant caudate lobe resection as an option for donor hepatectomy in adult living related liver transplantation

Unusual grafts for living-donor liver transplantation

PURPOSE

Unusual grafts, including extended left liver plus caudate lobe, right anterior section, and right posterior section grafts, are alternatives to left and right lobe grafts for living-donor liver transplantation. This study aimed to investigate unusual grafts from the perspectives of recipients and donors.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2021, 497 patients received living-donor liver transplantation at Severance Hospital. Among them, 10 patients received unusual grafts. Three patients received extended left liver plus caudate lobe grafts, two patients received right anterior section grafts, and five patients received right posterior section grafts. Liver volumetrics and anatomy were analyzed for all recipients and donors. We collected data on laboratory examinations (alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, international normalized ratio), imaging studies, graft survival, and complications. A 1:2 ratio propensity-score matching method was used to reduce selection bias and balance variables between the unusual and conventional graft groups.

RESULTS

The median of Model for End-stage Liver Disease score of unusual graft recipients was 13.5 (interquartile range 11.5-19.3) and that of graft-recipient weight ratio was 0.767 (0.7-0.9). ABO incompatibility was observed in four cases. The alanine aminotransferase level, total bilirubin level, and international normalized ratio decreased in both recipients and donors. Unusual and conventional grafts had similar survival rates (p = 0.492). The right and left subgroups did not differ from each counter-conventional subgroup (p = 0.339 and p = 0.695, respectively). The incidence of major complications was not significantly different between unusual and conventional graft recipients (p = 0.513). Wound seromas were reported by unusual graft donors; the complication ratio was similar to that in conventional graft donors (p = 0.169).

CONCLUSION

Although unusual grafts require a complex indication, they may show feasible surgical outcomes for recipients with an acceptable donor complication.

Regeneration of caudate lobe after living donor liver transplantation : Comparison with a surrogate model of left lobe graft

Background : The aim of this study is to clarify the regeneration of the CL (caudate lobe) without any reconstructions of short hepatic veins (SHVr) after LDLT (living donor liver transplantation) and compare the regeneration of the CL after right hepatectomy (Rt. Hx), as the surrogate model of extended left lobe graft (Ex LLG) with complete SHVr. Methods : Eleven Ex LLGs with CL were included in this study. SHVr was not performed in all cases. The volumetry was performed before, one month and six months after LDLT. Seven patients who underwent Rt. Hx were also included in this study as the surrogate model. Results : In Ex LLGs with CL, the regeneration rate of the large CL (> 30 ml) was worse than that of small CL (< 30 ml). In the surrogate model, the regeneration rate of the CL was not worse than other segments. However, the regeneration rate of the large CL was also worse than that of small CL even in the presence of complete SHVr. Conclusions : The regeneration of the large CL was worse than that of the small CL regardless of the presence or absence of SHVr, indicating that SHVr in Ex LLG with CL might not be necessary. J. Med. Invest. 68 : 330-333, August, 2021.

Laparoscopic portal branch ligation of the right caudate lobe concomitant with portal vein embolization for planned right hemihepatectomy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers

BACKGROUND

The role of ligation of the portal venous branches to the caudate lobe (cPVL) as preparation for planned major hepatectomy is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic cPVL (Lap-cPVL) concomitant with transileocolic portal vein embolization of the right portal venous system (rTIPE), namely, Lap-cPVL/rTIPE, for planned right hemihepatectomy (rHx) in advanced hepatobiliary cancer patients.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients who underwent rHx after rTIPE with/without Lap-cPVL between March 2013 and March 2020 were enrolled in this study. The Lap-cPVL was performed for the portal branches of the right caudate lobe.

RESULTS

Eight of the 31 patients underwent Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. The degree of hypertrophy was significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (19.3%, range 6.5-25.6%) as compared to rTIPE (7.2%, range - 1.1 to 21.2%) (p=0.027). The functional kinetic growth rate was also significantly increased in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE (5.40%, range 2.17-5.97) than that in rTIPE (1.85%, range - 0.22 to 6.45%) (p=0.046). Postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B occurred in 21.7% of patients in rTIPE, while there was no postoperative liver failure ≧ grade B in Lap-cPVL/rTIPE. Mortality rates were zero after rHx in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Lap-cPVL/rTIPE is safe and provides an additional effect on liver hypertrophy in advanced hepatobiliary cancers.

Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Small-for-size grafts (SFSGs) in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) could optimize donor postoperative outcomes and also expand the potential donor pool. Evidence on whether SFSGs would affect medium-term and long-term recipient graft survival is lacking.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in adult to adult LDLT.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by searching eligible studies published before January 24, 2019 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcomes were 3-year and 5-year graft survival. Incidence of small-for-size syndrome and short term mortality were also extracted.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis is reported according to the guidelines of the PRISMA 2009 Statement. Seven retrospective observational studies with a total of 1821 LDLT recipients were included in the meta-analysis. SFSG is associated with significantly poorer medium-term graft survival. The pooled odds ratio for 3-year graft survival was 1.58 [95% confidence interval 1.10-2.29, P = 0.014]. On the other hand, pooled results of the studies showed that SFSG had no significant discriminatory effect on 5-year graft survival with an odds ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.97, P = 0.199). Furthermore, incidence of small-for-size syndrome detected in recipients of SFSG ranged from 0-11.4% in the included studies.

CONCLUSION

SFSG is associated with inferior medium-term but not long-term graft survival. Comparable long-term graft survival based on liver graft size shows that smaller grafts could be accepted for LDLT with appropriate flow modulatory measures. Close follow-up for graft function is warranted within 3 years after liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation: looking back at my 30 years of experience

Since I moved from the National Cancer Center to Shinshu University, I have been performing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which is the only way to save the life of patients with end-stage liver disease. In June 1990, we performed the first LDLT that case was the first successful case in Japan. The patient remains healthy and is enjoying a normal life still 28 years after the transplant. In 1993, we successfully performed adult-to-adult LDLT, which was the first successful case in the world. The patient enjoyed a normal life for 17 years until she died at 70 years of age. For small children, the left liver of adult donors is too large to close the abdomen. However, in adolescents or adults, even when the whole right liver is used, the volume of the graft is too small. The concept of the standard liver volume (SLV) has proven very important for this procedure and is calculated as follows: 706.2 × body surface area + 2.4. We proposed a method for evaluating the congestion of the liver by Doppler ultrasound. In addition, we devised the right lateral sector graft. Over the years, we have contributed to LDLT in many ways and published many papers. We feel that our findings are quite useful not only for LDLT but also for other hepatectomy procedures.

Portal Supply and Venous Drainage of the Caudate Lobe in the Healthy Human Liver: Virtual Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Volume Study

OBJECTIVE

The venous vascular anatomy of the caudate lobe is exceptional. The purpose of this study was to assess portal inflow and venous outflow volumes of the caudate lobe.

METHODS

Extrahepatic (provided by the first-order branches) versus intrahepatic (provided by the second- to third-order branches) portal inflow, as well as direct (via Spieghel veins) versus indirect (via hepatic veins) venous drainage patterns were analyzed in virtual 3-D liver maps in 140 potential live liver donors.

RESULTS

The caudate lobe has a greater intrahepatic than extrahepatic portal inflow volume (mean 55 ± 26 vs. 45 ± 26%: p = 0.0763), and a greater extrahepatic than intrahepatic venous drainage (mean 54-61 vs. 39-46%). Intrahepatic drainage based on mean estimated values showed the following distribution: middle > inferior (accessory) > right > left hepatic vein.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacrifice of extrahepatic caudate portal branches can be compensated by the intrahepatic portal supply. The dominant outflow via Spieghel veins and the negligible role of left hepatic vein in caudate venous drainage may suggest reconstruction of caudate outflow via Spieghel veins in instances of extended left hemiliver live donation not inclusive of the middle hepatic vein. The anatomical data and the real implication for living donors must be further verified by clinical studies.

Left hepatectomy after right paramedian sectoriectomy

Repeat hepatectomy is beneficial for selected patients with recurrence of liver malignancies. However, the operative procedure becomes technically demanding when the previous hepatectomy was complex, with hepatic veins and stump of portal pedicles exposed on the liver transection surface. We performed left hepatectomy after right paramedian sectoriectomy (RPMS) for three patients. Here, we describe our surgical technique and the postoperative outcomes achieved. This procedure allowed for safe adhesiolysis between the middle and right hepatic veins by following a fibrous plane. The mean operative time was 8.7 h, including 4.9 h of adhesiolysis. The mean remnant liver volume (right lateral sector and the caudate lobe) was calculated as 704 ml, being 62% of total liver volume. There was no postoperative liver failure or mortality. In conclusion, left hepatectomy after RPMS is a feasible procedure for patients with sufficient remnant liver volume, even though the middle and right hepatic veins run side by side after liver regeneration.

Living donor liver transplantation: eliminating the wait for death in end-stage liver disease?

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALDLT), outside of Asia, remains an important yet underutilized gift of life. For patients with end-stage liver disease, A2ALDLT is a proven transplantation option, with lower waiting list mortality and suffering, and equivalent or better allograft and patient survival than deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The risks to living donors and the benefit to their recipients have been carefully defined with long-term level 1 and 2 evidence-based study. An overview of the development and practice of living donor liver transplant (LDLT), including donor and recipient surgical allograft innovation, is provided. The issues of recipient selection, outcomes and morbidity, including disease-variable study and challenges past and present are presented in comparison with DDLT cohorts, and future insights are described. Central to practice is the careful and concise review of donor evaluation and selection and donor outcome, morbidity, quality of life and present and future strategies for donor advocacy and growth of the technique.

Left Lobe Auxiliary Liver Transplantation for End-stage Hepatitis B Liver Cirrhosis

Auxiliary liver transplantation (ALT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver cirrhosis previously showed poor results, because the native liver was a significant source of HBV recurrence and the graft could be rapidly destroyed by HBV infection in an immunosuppressive condition. Four patients with HBV-related liver cirrhosis were unable to undergo orthotopic liver transplantation because the only available grafts of left lobe were too small. Under entecavir-based anti-HBV treatment, they underwent ALT in which the recipient left liver was removed and the small left lobe graft was implanted in the corresponding space. The mean graft weight/recipient weight was 0.49% (range, 0.38%-0.55%). One year after transplantation, the graft sizes were increased to 273% and the remnant livers were decreased to 44%. Serum HBV DNA was persistently undetectable. Periodic graft biopsy showed no signs of tissue injury and negative immunostaining for hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core antigen. After a mean follow-up period of 21 months, all patients live well with normal graft function. Our study suggests that ALT for HBV-related liver cirrhosis is feasible under entecavir-based anti-HBV treatment. Successful application of small left livers in end-stage liver cirrhosis may significantly increase the pool of left liver grafts for adult patients.

In Situ Split Liver Transplantation for 2 Adult Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

Background Material and Methods Results Conclusions.

Small for Size and Flow (SFSF) syndrome: An alternative description for posthepatectomy liver failure

Small for Size Syndrome (SFSS) syndrome is a recognizable clinical syndrome occurring in the presence of a reduced mass of liver, which is insufficient to maintain normal liver function. A definition has yet to be fully clarified, but it is a common clinical syndrome following partial liver transplantation and extended hepatectomy, which is characterized by postoperative liver dysfunction with prolonged cholestasis and coagulopathy, portal hypertension, and ascites. So far, this syndrome has been discussed with focus on the remnant size of the liver after partial liver transplantation or extended hepatectomy. However, the current viewpoints believe that the excessive flow of portal vein for the volume of the liver parenchyma leads to over-pressure, sinusoidal endothelial damages and haemorrhage. The new hypothesis declares that in both extended hepatectomy and partial liver transplantation, progression of Small for Size Syndrome is not determined only by the "size" of the liver graft or remnant, but by the hemodynamic parameters of the hepatic circulation, especially portal vein flow. Therefore, we suggest the term "Small for Size and Flow (SFSF)" for this syndrome. We believe that it is important for liver surgeons to know the pathogenesis and manifestation of this syndrome to react early enough preventing non-reversible tissue damages.

Living donor liver transplantation using dual grafts: Experience and lessons learned from cases worldwide

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), insufficient graft volume could result in small-for-size syndrome in recipients, whereas major liver donation predisposes the donor to a high risk of posthepatectomy liver failure. Dual graft LDLT is therefore introduced to obtain combined graft sufficiency. To date, 367 patients have been reported worldwide. We reviewed all the relevant literature, with a special focus on 43 case reports containing enough data to extract and analyze. A simple decision-making algorithm was developed. Dual graft LDLT is indicated when (1) a single donation is unacceptable due to graft-to-recipient size mismatch; (2) the future liver remnant is insufficient in the single donor after major resection; or (3) there is a significant underlying disorder or anatomical variation within the donor liver. The outcome of dual graft LDLT is reported to be comparable with that of single donor LDLT. Unilateral graft atrophy was found in 7 of the 43 patients, predominantly in the right-sided, heterotopic and initially smaller grafts. Technically, the heterotopic implantation and complex vascular reconstruction are the most demanding. Elaborate surgical planning and modification are needed. Ethical concerns about involving a second living donor need to be addressed. In conclusion, dual graft LDLT should be prudently performed in select cases by surgeons of proven expertise when single donation is unacceptable and a second living donor is available. The decision-making criteria need to be standardized. More surgical modification and clinical research are needed.

Liver Transplantation: East versus West

Liver transplantation (LT) has evolved rapidly since the first successful liver transplant performed in1967. Despite a humble beginning, this procedure gained widespread acceptance in the western world as a suitable option for patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) by the beginning of the 1980s. At present, approximately 25,000 liver transplants are being performed worldwide every year with approximately 90% one year survival. The techniques of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) developed in East Asia in the 1990s to overcome the shortage of suitable grafts for children and scarcity of deceased donors. While deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) constitutes more than 90% of LT in the western world, in India and other Asian countries, most transplants are LDLT. Despite the initial disparity, outcomes following LDLT in eastern countries have been quite satisfactory when compared to the western programs. The etiologies of liver failure requiring LT vary in different parts of the world. The commonest etiology for acute liver failure (ALF) leading to LT is drugs in the west and acute viral hepatitis in Asia. The most common indication for LT due to ESLD in west is alcoholic cirrhosis and hepatitis C virus (HCV), while hepatitis B virus (HBV) predominates in the east. There is a variation in prognostic models for assessing candidature and prioritizing organ allocation across the world. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is followed in United States and some European centers. Other European countries rely on the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score. Some parts of Asia still follow chronological order of listing. The debate regarding the best model for organ allocation is far from over.

Review of the surgical approach to prevent small-for-size syndrome in recipients after left lobe adult LDLT

Left lobe liver grafts increase the donor safety in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). However, the left lobe graft provides about 30-50 % of the required liver volume to adult recipients, which is insufficient to sustain their metabolic demands, which can lead to small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Transient portal hypertension and microcirculatory hemodynamic derangement, apart from outflow obstruction, during the first week after reperfusion are the critical events associated with small-for-size graft transplantation. The incidence of SFSS in left lobe ALDLT can be decreased by increasing the left lobe graft volume by effective utilization of the caudate lobe with preserved vascular supply, by modulating the portal pressure with splenectomy or a porto-systemic shunt or by hepatic venous outflow reconstruction to prevent the development of venous congestion. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of SFSS and the various surgical strategies that can be performed to prevent SFSS in an effort to enhance the donor safety during living-donor liver transplantation.

Temporary auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation using a small graft for familial amyloid polyneuropathy

Donor shortage is a major issue in liver transplantation. We have successfully performed temporary auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) using a small volume graft procured from a living donor for recipients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). The aim of this study was to evaluate this procedure by comparing it with standard living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We compared 13 recipients undergoing this procedure with 23 recipients undergoing a standard LDLT for the treatment of FAP. The estimated donor graft volume and the graft volume/recipient's standard liver volume ratio were significantly smaller in the temporary APOLT group than in the standard LDLT group. Postoperative complications were comparable, although the hospital stay was longer in the temporary APOLT group. All the patients safely underwent a remnant native liver resection about 2 months after their first operation in the temporary APOLT group. No symptoms related to FAP developed before the remnant liver resection, and no significant differences in graft and patient survival were observed between the two groups. We successfully performed temporary APOLT using a small volume liver graft without postoperative liver failure for FAP. Temporary APOLT for FAP might be a useful alternative procedure for expanding the donor pool for LDLT.

Severe outflow block syndrome caused by compression by the swollen caudate lobe after living donor liver transplantation: report of a case

A 50-year-old man with primary biliary cirrhosis underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a graft of a left hemiliver with a left caudate lobe and duct-to-duct hepaticocholedochostomy. Postoperative bile leakage necessitated percutaneous drainage 22 days after LDLT. The patient presented to our hospital 205 days after the LDLT with abdominal distension and fever. Computed tomography showed ascites and a diffusely mottled pattern in the graft. The caudate lobe was swollen, and its bile ducts were dilated. The inferior vena cava was forced to the right by the swollen caudate lobe, and the root of the hepatic vein was stretched. The hepatic vein was not contrasted. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography showed a biliary anastomotic stricture. Based on these findings, we diagnosed a severe outflow block of the hepatic vein and biliary anastomotic stricture. We performed balloon dilation of the biliary anastomosis and implanted a metallic stent in the hepatic vein. Thereafter, his clinical symptoms improved dramatically.

Morphometric analysis of caudate veins for advanced liver surgery

BACKGROUND

  Accurate knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the caudate lobe is indispensable in the performance of liver surgery. Although previous cast studies have provided much useful overall information about the locations of the caudate veins, little is known about how to establish the exact locations of the caudate and short hepatic veins prior to surgery.

OBJECTIVES

  This study was conducted as a practical morphometric analysis of the caudate veins using preoperative enhanced computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS).

METHODS

  From July 2003 to October 2005, 116 donor hepatectomies were performed for adult living donor liver transplantation. The numbers and locations of visible caudate veins were examined pre- and intraoperatively using CT and IOUS.

RESULTS

  In the 116 patients, a total of 152 caudate veins were detected, which were classified as being of either typical (n= 135) or non-typical (n= 17) type. One caudate vein was detectable in 83 patients (72%), two in 30 patients (26%) and three in three patients (3%). A total of 67% of caudate veins detected by IOUS and 70% detected by CT were located on the ventral 60 ° of the inferior vena cava (IVC). The remaining veins were scattered on both lateral sides.

CONCLUSIONS

  Preoperative CT and IOUS were useful in providing morphometric information of sizable caudate veins. Precise information on these veins is essential for the safe dissection of the caudate lobe from the IVC in advanced liver surgery.

Impact of short hepatic vein reconstruction in living donor adult liver transplantation using a left liver plus caudate lobe graft

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of short hepatic vein reconstruction in the transplanted left liver plus caudate lobe graft.

METHODS

Six left liver plus caudate lobe grafts used for living donor adult liver transplantation were included in this study. The liver grafts were divided into two groups: those with (V1 group; n = 4) or without (control group; n = 2) short hepatic vein reconstruction. The changes in the transplanted left lobe (segments II-IV) and caudate lobe were compared between the two groups at 1 month after transplantation.

RESULTS

The addition of the caudate lobe increased the graft volume by 15 mL, which corresponded to a 4.3% gain of graft volume at the time of transplantation. Although the graft volume/standard liver volume ratio of the whole grafts after transplantation showed no difference between the two groups, the regeneration rate of the caudate lobe in the V1 group was significantly greater than that in the control group (p= 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Although no definite advantage from the V1 reconstruction was demonstrated, hepatic vein reconstruction with a significantly-sized short hepatic vein might provide an additional margin of safety for marginally-sized liver grafts during the early phase of graft regeneration.

Clinical application of measurement of liver volume by multi-slice spiral CT

The volume of the liver can not only directly reflect the size of the liver, liver capacity and the quantity of liver cells, but also, to a certain extent, indirectly reflect blood perfusion and metabolic capability of the liver. Therefore, liver volume is an important parameter to evaluate hepatic reserve function. The accurate measurement of liver volume has great significance for the formulation of treatment program, prevention of liver failure, and prediction of prognosis. This article is to review the clinical application of measurement of liver volume by multi-slice spiral CT.

Split-liver transplantation in 2 adults: significance of caudate lobe outflow reconstruction in left lobe recipient: case report

Split-liver transplantation is a well-known procedure for increasing the donor pool. The procedure is commonly used in 1 adult and 1 child, but is less commonly performed in 2 adults because of technical difficulty and poor outcome in left-lobe recipients. Preservation of caudate lobe function is important in recipients with borderline graft-recipient weight ratio to achieve better results. Herein, we report a case in which caudate lobe outflow was reconstructed in a left lobe with a caudate lobe graft in split-liver transplantation in 2 adults.

Prognosis of adult patients transplanted with liver grafts < 35% of their standard liver volume

We have previously reported that a graft volume (GV) > 30% of the recipient's standard liver volume (SLV) can meet the recipient's metabolic demands. Here we report our experience with adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using left side grafts < 35% of the recipient's SLV. Of 143 adult living donor liver transplants, 13 auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplants, 8 right side grafts, and 2 retransplantation cases were excluded. The resulting 120 cases were divided into 2 groups: group S consisted of 33 patients who received liver grafts < 35% of their SLV, and group L consisted of 87 patients who received liver grafts > or = 35% of their SLV. Patient characteristics, postoperative liver function, duration of hospital stay, and recipient survival rates were compared between the 2 groups. There were no significant differences between groups in recipient or donor background characteristics. The mean GV/SLV ratio of group S was 31.8%, whereas that of group L was 42.5%. There were no significant differences in the postoperative serum total bilirubin levels, prothrombin time international normalized ratio, daily ascites volume, or duration of postoperative hospital stay between the groups. The 1- and 5-year survival rates in group S were 80.7% and 64.2%, respectively, whereas those of group L were 90.8% and 84.9%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. In conclusion, graft size was not considered to be the only cause of so-called small-for-size graft syndrome, and left side grafting appears to be the procedure of choice for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation because of the lower risk to donors in comparison with right lobe grafting.

Liver Transplantation in Asia: Past, Present and Future

With the technical advances and improvements in perioperative management and immunosuppressants, liver transplantation is the standard treatment for patients with end-stage liver diseases. In Asia, a shortage of deceased donor liver grafts is the universal problem to be faced with in all transplant centres. Many surgical innovations are then driven to counteract this problem. This review focuses on 3 issues that denote the development of liver transplantation in Asian countries. These include living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), split liver transplantation (SLT) and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Minimal graft weight, types of liver graft to donate and the inclusion of the middle hepatic vein with the graft are the main issues to be established in LDLT. The rapid growth and wide dissemination of LDLT has certainly alleviated the supply-and-demand problem of liver grafts in Asia. SLT is another attractive approach. Technical expertise, donor selection and graft allocation are the main determinants for its success. Liver transplantation plays a key role in the management of HCC in Asia. LDLT would be the main strategy in this aspect. The issue of extending the selection criteria for HCC patients for LDLT is still controversial. On the whole, future developments to increase the donor pool for the expanding recipient need in Asia would involve transplantation from non-heart beating donor and ABO incompatible transplantation.

Donor risk in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: impact of left lobe graft

BACKGROUND

To ensure donor safety in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, we established a selection criterion for donors in which left lobe (LL) was the first choice of graft.

METHODS

Two hundred six consecutive donors were retrospectively studied. Donors were divided into two groups according to graft type: LL graft (n=137) and right lobe (RL) graft (n=69).

RESULTS

Although mean intraoperative blood loss of LL was significantly increased compared with RL, mean peak postoperative total bilirubin levels and duration of hospital stay after surgery were significantly less for LL than RL (P<0.05). No donor died or suffered a life-threatening complication during the study period. The overall complication rate was 34.0%, including biliary complications in 5.3%. The number of biliary complications was four (2.9%) in LL and seven (10.1%) in RL (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only graft type (LL vs. RL) is significantly related to the occurrence of biliary complications (odds ratio 0.11; P=0.0012). The cumulative overall graft survival rates in the recipients with LL were not significantly different from that in the recipients with RL.

CONCLUSIONS

LL grafting should be considered favorably when selecting donors for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

Current concept of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation

The extended application of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has revealed the problem of graft size mismatching called "small-for-size (SFS) graft syndrome." The initial trials to resolve this problem involved increasing the procured graft size, from left to right, and even extension to include a right lobe graft. Clinical cases of living right lobe donations have been reported since then, drawing attention to the risks of increasing the liver volume procured from a living donor. However, not only other modes of increasing graft volume such as auxiliary or dual liver transplantation, but also control of the increased portal pressure caused by an SFS graft, such as a portosystemic shunt or splenectomy, have been trialed with some positive results. To establish an effective strategy for transplanting SFS grafts and preventing SFS graft syndrome, it is essential to have precise knowledge and tactics to evaluate graft quality and graft volume, when performing these LDLTs with portal pressure control. We reviewed the updated literature on the pathogenesis of and strategies for using SFS grafts.

Strategies for improving the outcomes of small-for-size grafts in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been refined and accepted as a valuable treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease in order to overcome the shortage of organs and mortality on the waiting list. However, graft size problems, especially small-for-size (SFS) grafts, remain the greatest limiting factor for the expansion of LDLT, especially in adult-to-adult transplantation. Various attempts have been made to overcome the problems regarding SFS grafts, such as increasing the graft liver volume and/or controlling excessive portal inflow to a small graft, with considerable positive outcomes. Recent innovations in basic studies have also contributed to the treatment of SFS syndrome. Herein, we review the literature and assess our current knowledge of the pathogenesis and treatment strategies for the use of SFS grafts in adult-to-adult LDLT.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer death, particularly in Asia where the major etiology, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, is endemic. The tumor frequently develops in a background of cirrhosis, and liver transplantation offers a chance to cure both the tumor and the underlying cirrhosis. The Milan criteria based on tumor size and number as an estimate of tumor burden are conventionally the gold standard in determining eligibility for transplantation, and the outcome is excellent. The shortage of organs from deceased donors has curtailed the adoption of extended criteria and led to the problems of long waiting times and dropouts. Several measures have been taken to tackle these issues, including prioritization of patients with HCC, use of pretransplant adjuvant treatment to prevent tumor progression, and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). With a high incidence of HCC and a low organ donation rate, Asia has developed a distinctive pattern of indication and strategy in the application of liver transplantation. Over the last decade, the number of liver transplants in Asia has increased rapidly, by 10-fold, largely as a result of the development of LDLT. The proportion of patients who undergo liver transplantation for HCC is increasing and HCC comprises one third of the indication for liver transplantation in Asia. LDLT is the dominant strategy, accounting for 96% of the liver transplants for HCC. Many transplant programs accept patients beyond the Milan criteria, and the reported 3-year survival rate is about 60%. With the promotion of organ donation, better quantification of the benefit of LDLT for extended indications, and identification of predictors for survival, the practice of liver transplantation for HCC in Asia will continue to evolve.

The caudate processus hepatic vein: a boundary hepatic vein between the caudate lobe and the right liver

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to find the boundary vein indicating the intersegmental plane between the caudate lobe and the adjacent liver segments.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Major hepatic veins of the human liver commonly run through the intersegmental plane and are widely used for the landmarks to define the boundary of both sides of liver segments. As the caudate lobe is a small independent unit of the liver separate from the right and left livers, the existence of the boundary hepatic vein to the adjacent liver segments has been expected.

METHODS

Fifty-four adult cadaveric livers were minutely dissected to elucidate the correlation between the portal vein branches and the hepatic veins on both the caudate lobe and the adjacent liver segments.

RESULTS

Among the hepatic veins of the caudate lobe, the caudate processus hepatic vein entering the inferior vena cava at hepatic hilum runs in the segmental plane between the caudate processus and the right liver. Three types of the caudate processus hepatic vein directly entering the inferior vena cava and 1 type of the exceptional hepatic vein that was the tributary of the right hepatic vein were observed. They drained the blood of the caudate processus and a part of the right liver, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The caudate processus hepatic vein is one of the candidates of the hepatic vein indicating the boundary between the caudate lobe and the adjacent liver segments. New procedures will be developed on the liver surgeries by acquiring the anatomic features of this vein.

Impact of donor age and recipient status on left-lobe graft for living donor adult liver transplantation

Donor safety is the priority when performing a living donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT). We herein present our findings using left-lobe graft in LDALT. Data on 119 recipients who underwent the LDALT, and on 119 donors who underwent extended left lobectomy were reviewed. The recipients were divided into groups above (n = 19) and below (n = 100) 50 years of donor age, into groups above (n = 63) and below (n = 56) 40% of graft size (graft volume/standard liver volume, GV/SLV), and above (n = 25) and below (n = 94) 20 of pre-operative model for end-stage liver disease (MELD). Total bilirubin (TB), volume of ascites, prothrombin time international normalized ratio on postoperative day 14 or survival rates were compared. TB (mg/dl) or volume of ascites (ml) of the group in donor age < 50 years was better than that of the group in donor age > or = 50 years (7.4 vs. 14.7 or 788 vs. 1379, P < 0.001 or P < 0.005, respectively). The graft and patient survival rates of the lower MELD group tended to be better than that of the higher MELD group. LDALT can be safely performed using a left-lobe graft. However, when using the graft from the donor > or = 50 years, especially for the recipients with the MELD > or = 20, the indications should be carefully discussed.

Living-donor liver transplantation: an overview

It has been 16 years since the first successful living-donor liver transplant was performed from a parent to a child. The overall recipient and graft survival, together with a low morbidity and mortality in donors, have resulted in the widespread acceptance of the procedure by both the transplant community and the public at large. Adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation has been evolving over the past decade. Despite living-donor transplant patients being better-risk candidates than those who receive a graft from a deceased donor, and well-established and experienced units achieving satisfactory results, overall recipient and graft survival recorder by registries can only be described as suboptimal. This, combined with the high morbidity and not-insignificant mortality amongst donors makes expansion of adult-to-adult liver transplantation hard to justify on a risk-benefit analysis.

Outcomes of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: a single institution's experience with 335 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

To determine outcomes for both donors and recipients of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AALDLT) and independent factors impacting those outcomes.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Deceased donors for organ transplantation remain extremely rare, making living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) practically the sole therapeutic modality for patients with end-stage liver disease in Japan.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of initial LDLT for 335 consecutive adult (>or=18 years) patients performed between November 1994 and December 2003.

RESULTS

: Of the 335 recipients, 275 received right-liver grafts and the remaining 60 recipients received non-right-liver grafts. Three of the 335 liver grafts were domino-splitting livers. Sixty of the 332 donors other than the domino-donors showed major postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis indicated that accumulation of case experience significantly and advantageously affected the surgical outcomes of these living liver donors, and right-liver donation and prolonged donor operation time were shown to be independent risk factors of major complications in the donors. Post-transplant patient and graft survival estimates were 73.1% and 72.5% at 1 year, 67.7% and 66.3% at 4 years, and 64.7% and 61.9% at 7 years, respectively. Obvious pretransplant encephalopathy, a higher (>or=31) modified Model for End-stage Liver Disease score (including points for persistent ascites and low serum sodium) and higher donor age (>or=50 years) were indicated as independent factors predictive of graft failure (graft loss or death) in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft type and degree of experience exerted a significant impact on the surgical outcomes of AALDLT donors but did not significantly affect the survival outcomes of AALDLT recipients. Better pretransplant conditions and younger age (<50 years) among the living donors appeared to be advantageous in terms of gaining better survival outcomes of patients undergoing AALDLT.

Adult-to-adult live-donor liver transplantation: the current status

Adult-to-adult live-donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) has emerged successfully to partially relieve the refractory shortage of deceased donor grafts caused by the increasing demands of patients with endstage liver diseases. Following the first successful live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for a child with biliary atresia in 1989, further extension of the technique, using left-lobe liver grafts for LDLT for large adolescents and adults, has resulted in satisfactory graft and patient survival outcomes. However, small-for-size syndrome may occur in some patients with large body size, and in those with acute-on-chronic liver failure or severe portal hypertension. To overcome the problem of graft-to-body-size mismatch, ALDLT, using a right-lobe liver graft was developed. Although routine inclusion of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right-lobe liver graft is still controversial, the importance of providing good venous drainage for the right anterior sector to ensure better early graft function has gained wide recognition. Preservation of the MHV in the donor is intuitively considered important in reducing the donor risk. However, there are scarce data supporting the contention that postoperative complication is related to the absence of the MHV in the left-liver remnant. Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction has potential advantages over hepaticojejunostomy, and has become the preferred technique in ALDLT. However, biliary complications, especially biliary strictures on long-term follow-up, occur in about 30% of the recipients. The potential beneficial effect of internal or external biliary drainage in reducing the biliary complication rate after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in ALDLT also remains controversial. Dual-liver grafts and right-posterior sector grafts have been used in ALDLT, and are reported to result in satisfactory survival outcomes at selected transplant centers. There is no strong evidence supporting the postulate that patients with hepatitis C infection have an inferior survival outcome after ALDLT when compared with recipients of a deceased-donor liver transplant. ALDLT has contributed to satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It allows early surgery for the patients and eliminates the uncertainty of prolonged waiting for a deceased-donor liver graft, and the risks of dropout related to disease progression. The exact selection criteria of patients with HCC for ALDLT have yet to be defined.

Outcome of donors with a remnant liver volume of less than 35% after right hepatectomy

To overcome the barrier of size match, right lobe graft has been widely used in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We assessed donor outcome, with a focus on remnant liver volume (RLV) after right hepatectomy based on the experiences of 2 LDLT centers, as a means of guiding the establishment of safe RLV limits for donor right hepatectomy. Between January 2002 and December 2003, a consecutive 146 liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy with at least 12 months of follow-up were enrolled in this study. Donors were grouped into 2 groups according to RLV: group 1 (n = 74), <35% (range, 26.9-34.9) and group 2 (n = 72), > or = 35% (35.0-46.8). No donors died or suffered a life-threatening complication. Mean peak serum postoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (IU/L) levels were 219.5 +/- 79.9 and 231.5 +/- 83.3 in group 1 and 210.3 +/- 81.6 and 225.8 +/- 93.0 in group 2 (P = 0.497 and 0.699), respectively. Mean peak serum total bilirubin (TB) (mg/dL) level in group 1 (3.4 +/- 1.6) was higher than in group 2 (2.8 +/- 1.4; P = 0.023). Overall 23 (15.8%) major morbidities, 10 in group 1 (13.5%) and 13 in group 2 (18.1%), occurred according to Clavien's system (P = 0.939). These included bleeding (n = 3 in group 1 and n = 6 in group 2; P = 0.282), ileus (n = 3 and 1; P = 0.324), biliary leakage (n = 4 and 4; P = 0.968), and pneumonia (n = 0 and 2; P = 0.149). Minor morbidities were also comparable in the 2 groups. In conclusion, the outcome of donors with an RLV of <35% was not different from that of donors with an RLV of > or = 35%, with the exception of transient cholestasis. Therefore, a remnant RLV of <35% does not appear to be a contraindication for right liver procurement in living donors.

N/A

N/A

Tailoring the type of donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation

Donor hepatectomies for adult living donor liver transplantations were performed in 200 consecutive donors to harvest a left liver (LL) graft (n = 5), a LL plus caudate lobe (LL + CL) graft (n = 63), a right liver (RL) graft (n = 86), a RL and middle hepatic vein (RL + MHV) graft (n = 28) or a right lateral sector (RLS) graft (n = 18). The graft type was selected so that at least 40% of the recipient's standard liver volume was harvested. No donor deaths occurred, and no significant differences in the morbidity rates among either donors or recipients were observed when the outcomes were stratified according to the graft type. Donors who donated RL exhibited higher values of serum total bilirubin and prothrombin time than those who donated non-RL (LL, LL + CL, RLS) grafts. The time taken for hilar dissection and parenchymal transection increased in the following order: RLS graft, LL graft and RL graft harvesting. In conclusion, non-RL grafting was more time consuming, but the hepatic functional loss in the donors was smaller. Our graft selection criteria were useful for reducing the use of RL grafts with acceptable morbidity in both donors and recipients.

Living-donor liver transplantation: present status and future perspective

About 15 years have passed since the first liver transplant from a living donor (living donor liver transplantation: LDLT), and the status of the procedure has since been established as a standard cure for end-stage liver disease in Japan where liver transplantation (LTx) from deceased donors has not yet been accepted. However, the following problems are surfacing with the increase in the number of LDLTs between adults: graft size mismatching, an ABO blood-type incompatible transplantation, the expansion of LDLT indication to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the relapse of hepatitis C after LDLT, marginal donors, and the freedom from immunosuppressive treatment. In this article we outline the present conditions of these problems and the future view of the LDLT.

Simplified standardized technique for living donor liver transplantation using left liver graft plus caudate lobe

Concomitant resection of the caudate lobe (CL) would increase the liver mass in the left liver graft. We tried to define a simplified standardized technique for adult living donor liver transplantation using the extended left lobe (ELL) plus CL (ELLC) through a prospective study of 27 consecutive ELLC graft cases in 2003. Donor CL was dissected toward the 10 o'clock direction and transected at the midpoint between the trunks of the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the middle hepatic vein (MHV). This orthodox transection was performed in 18 cases, but the transection plane was moved left in 9 cases. Compared with conventional left liver implantation, there was no additional reconstruction except for single revascularization of the largest short hepatic vein of the CL (V1) in 21 cases. On 1-week computed tomography (CT) images, the perfusion states of the CL portion were good in 15 cases, fair in 7 cases, and poor in 5 cases. Regeneration of the CL portion during the 1st week was +43%, +18%, and -10% in the good, fair, and poor perfusion groups, respectively. There were positive correlations among the perfusion state of the CL, the location of the CL transection plane, and the width of the CL portion that was attached to the left liver graft. CL implantation resulted in a mean gain of graft mass by 5.9% in the left liver at the time of operation and by 3.9% after 1 week. There were no donor complications, and 25 recipients (93%) survive to date. In conclusion, this simplified standardized technique was feasible for most of the living donor livers and required only 1 additional reconstruction of the V1.

Spiegel?s Lobe Bile Ducts Often Drain into the Right Hepatic Duct or Its Branches: Study Using Drip-Infusion Cholangiography-Computed Tomography in 179 Consecutive Patients

Using drip-infusion cholangiography-computed tomography (DIC-CT), we successfully identified the bile ducts draining the caudate lobe in 138 of 179 consecutive patients with extrahepatic cholelithiasis (179 ducts from Spiegel's lobe and 154 from the paracaval portion; 1-5 ducts per patient). The dorsal subsegmental duct of S8 (B8c) was often identified and could be discriminated from the paracaval caudate ducts, thus acting as a landmark for the right margin of the caudate lobe. Notably, in more than one-third of the 138 patients, at least one of the Spiegel's lobe ducts drained into the right hepatic duct or its branches (30.2% of the 179 ducts overall; all ducts joined branches of the right lobe in 25 patients). Similarly, 34.4% of the 154 paracaval caudate lobe ducts drained into the left hepatic duct or its branches. These "anatomical left/right dissociations" between the drainage territory and route were much more frequent than previously reported. Our results confirm the effectiveness of DIC-CT as a classical, noninvasive method for presurgical evaluation of the biliary system, but they also suggest that anatomical partial resection of the dorsal liver in patients with hilar cholangioma is often impossible because of contralateral biliary drainage.

Reconstruction of isolated caudate portal vein in left liver graft

The addition of the caudate lobe to a left liver graft is known to increase graft volume by 9% and has been shown to be useful for overcoming borderline graft-recipient size mismatch in adult living donor liver transplantation. To assure full graft viability and regeneration, all of the feeding vessels for the caudate lobe should be preserved or reconstructed. However, more knowledge is needed about portal vein reconstruction for the caudate lobe. From January 1996 to August 2003, 238 living donor liver transplantations were performed at our institution. Of these, 67 donors underwent left hepatectomy with the caudate lobe and the middle hepatic vein. An isolated caudate portal vein originating from the left sidewall of the portal branches for the Spiegelian lobe (P1) was encountered in 9 donors (13.4%). The isolated P1 was reconstructed in 3 of the 9 cases using the pantaloon technique or interposition of an autovein graft. There were no complications related to P1 reconstruction and patency was confirmed by computerized tomography (CT) 1 month after transplantation. In the remaining 6 cases, the isolated P1 was very small (less than .5 mm) and did not require reconstruction. Isolated P1s are relatively rare, but when they are both present and large, it is advisable to undertake reconstruction that assures full graft function of the caudate lobe.

Sharing the middle hepatic vein between donor and recipient: left liver graft procurement preserving a large segment VIII branch in donor

There are few reported techniques to minimize the congestion in the donor after left liver graft procuring. If a large tributary of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) draining segment VIII (V8) converges into the root of the MHV in a donor of left liver, this branch should be preserved on the donor side. The volume of congested area when the V8 was ligated was predicted preoperatively by computed tomography (CT) and examined intraoperatively by the clamp test. Postoperative regeneration of the donor liver was evaluated by CT volumetry. This technique was used in 3 cases. The regeneration rate after 3 months of the right paramedian sector was 27, 38, and 8%, and that of the right lateral sector was 31, 63, and 39% in each donor, respectively. No severe complications occurred in the donors. In conclusion, V8 preservation in donors who underwent left liver resection led to satisfactory regeneration both of the right paramedian and lateral sectors and can minimize congestion in remnant liver.

Advances in adult living donor liver transplantation: a review based on reports from the 10th anniversary of the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation meeting in Tokyo

In 1993, the Shinshu Group performed the first successful adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). During the first 10 years of LDLT, many technical innovations have been reported. The major limitation of LDLT for adult recipients is the size of the graft. To overcome the problem, several graft types were designed, including left liver graft with caudate lobe, right liver, modified right liver, and right lateral sector and dual grafts. The necessity and criteria of reconstruction of middle hepatic vein is still on debate in right liver graft without trunk of middle hepatic vein. Biliary reconstruction remains a significant source of morbidity in LDLT. Donor safety must always be the primary consideration in LDLT and the selection criteria and management of the living donor must continue to be refined. On February 21, 2004, the 10(th) anniversary of the adult-to-adult LDLT meeting was held in Tokyo to review the accumulated experience and the presented information is summarized.

The surgical approach to HCC: our progress and results in Japan

Due to the prevalence of hepatitis virus infection, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is very high in Japan. Many techniques have been devised by Japanese surgeons to reduce the mortality rate after hepatectomy for HCC: preoperative precise evaluation of hepatic functional reserve, portal venous embolization as preoperative preparation, anatomical and nonanatomical limited resections using intraoperative ultrasonography, and intermittent inflow occlusion during liver transection. Several challenging surgical procedures are also being tried for advanced HCC: HCC with portal and hepatic venous tumor thrombus, multiple and/or recurrent HCC, and HCC in the caudate lobe. As a result, the latest national survey of HCC revealed that operative mortality was 0.9% and the 5-year survival rate after surgery was 52%. Living-donor liver transplantation for adult patients with HCC is another surgical treatment developed in Japan. After the success of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant using a left liver graft in 1993, a right liver graft, a left liver graft with caudate lobe, and a right lateral sector graft were developed. Indications for reconstructing the middle hepatic vein tributaries in right liver grafts were also proposed. Consequently, in our series of 36 patients with HCC who underwent living-donor liver transplantation, operative mortality was 3%, and the 2-year survival rate was 84%.

Living donor liver transplantation: issues regarding left liver grafts

BACKGROUND

The necessity of widening the indications for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been emphasised. Clarification of the advantages and limitations of using a left liver graft for LDLT in adults is essential for donor safety.

METHODS

Between June 1990 and November 2002, 185 patients underwent LDLT at Shinshu University Hospital, Japan. In 97 of these, the graft comprised the left liver with or without the left portion of the caudate lobe. The peri-hepatectomy profiles of the donors, significance of left liver grafts, postoperative courses of the donors and recipients, and survival of the recipients were investigated.

RESULTS

All the donors recovered well and returned to a normal lifestyle. None required banked-blood transfusion or repeat surgery, and postoperative liver function tests had satisfactory results. The cold ischaemic time for the graft was 127+/-54 minutes. The graft volumes (GVs) ranged from 230 to 625 ml, and GV/standard liver volume (SV) ratios varied from 22% to 65%, at the time of transplantation. Although 85% of the liver grafts had GV/SV ratios <50%, no patient developed immediate postoperative liver failure. Patient survival rates were 89%, 84% and 84% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Although LDLT using a left liver graft imposes potential postoperative complications (a small liver is more vulnerable to injury, and recipients of small grafts are at higher risk of complications during recovery), such grafts have yielded acceptable results in adult LDLT, with minimal burden to the donors.

Living donor liver transplantation: Eastern experiences

The techniques of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) developed rapidly in the 1990s to compensate for a severe deficiency in the availability of liver grafts from cadaveric donors for the treatment of patients with end-stage liver disease. This tendency was particularly prominent in East Asia, as brain-death donors have remained largely unavailable for a variety of reasons. Thanks to refinements in surgical technique and postoperative management for LDLT, the cumulative total of LDLTs in East Asian countries has exceeded 2000 and, importantly, donor mortality has yet to be encountered. Moreover, indications for LDLT have been successfully expanded from paediatric to adult cases, following the introduction of right lobe graft. The significance of LDLT under conditions of limited opportunities for cadaveric liver transplantation, as experienced in these countries, differs significantly from that seen with the numerous opportunities for cadaveric donors in Europe and the USA. This review describes not only the experiences of East Asia, but also the specific differences from Western countries, such as indications, graft size issues and ABO blood type combinations, to shed light on the future of liver transplantation.

Technical progress in living donor liver transplantation for adults

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation from a living donor (LDLT) was introduced during the 1990 s to overcome the shortage of donor organs, particularly among children and in those countries in which cadaveric grafts were seldom available. In Japan alone, some 1700 LDLTs were performed in the first 12 years with a 5-year survival rate of 70% in adults and an even higher rate (82%) in children. The major limitation to successful LDLT is inadequate graft size, which usually necessitates the use of the whole right liver unless (I) the caudate lobe is included in a left liver graft, (2) only the right lateral sector is employed (segments VI and VII) or (3) left livers from two donors are implanted into one recipient.

DISCUSSION

From a technical standpoint, the main problem with the various types of LDLT has been the venous reconstruction in the recipient. For the left-sided graft, the hepatic vein of the caudate lobe should be re-anastomosed to prevent congestion of this segment. For the right-sided graft, there has been uncertainty about the need to reconstruct the middle hepatic vein (MHV). Implantation is clearly simpler without this additional step, but there is a risk of dysfunction and sepsis in the right paramedian sector. Venous congestion in this sector can be observed during operation, both visually after clamping the MHV and by ultrasonographic assessment of the direction of blood flow in the portal vein. These techniques can be used to determine which patients require bench reconstruction of MHV tributaries or indeed of the inferior right hepatic vein. These manoeuvres should improve graft function and survival.

N/A

N/A